名牌安乐死范文

考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死范文（八）Writi ng （图画提纲式议论文）Directio ns: Study the followi ng picture carefully and write an essay of 160 -200 words in which you should1）describe the picture.2）state differe nt views on mercy killi ng, and3）give your opinion on it.晚期癌症病人请求安乐死。

我们怎么办？范文Mercy killi ng is one of the most con troversial issues in the world of medici ne. As the picture give n above depicts, a late-stage cancer patie nt is term in ally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinkin g. It implies that people differ in theirattitudes towards the mercy killi ng. Some people think that physicia n-assistedsuicide can relieve dying patie nts of un bearable pain and sufferi ng. They maintainthat as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he hasdone nothing illegal even if the patie nt uses the drug to haste n death. Others arestron gly opposed to physicia n-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has noright to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I'm concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if theyprolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am infavor of mercy killing. (207 words)译文：安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。

安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）第一篇：安乐死_英语作文The euthanasia The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged.The euthanasia has been becoming the hot topic around the world, and questioned discussion about its legalization occurs at home and abroad.In my opinion, the euthanasia is mercy.It can help hopeless ill patients to dead qucikly，relieve them from the pain , For these people，the quality of life is the foundation value of life.For these patients who can never be cured, death is unavoidable to them, so the euthanasia is the best way to let them away from great pain.And these patients have to suffer from the pain, at the same time, their family members have to stand the expensive medical expenses and the great hurt mentally，“We mustn't delay any longer … swallowing is difficult … and breathing, that's also difficult.Those muscles are weakening too … we mustn't delay any longer.”the words from a Dutchman asked his doctor to help him die.At that time ,he was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly get worse.Therefore,it's merciful for the doctors to help these patience come to an end of their life with the euthanasia.In addition, to reduce the pain of the patients is one of the doctors' duty, so euthanasia.is moral.To be frank, everyone has the right and freedom to manage their own final destiny, such as refuse any cure.And thus right also includes the freedom of choosing to die as well as the ways of death, even when it's necessary to ask somebody else to end their life.In a word.I want to call on the legitimization of the euthanasia.let the patients get rid of thestruggle between life and death as soon as possible.第二篇：英语作文：安乐死（1）有利于病人的自身利益。

支持安乐死英语作文Title: The Case for Euthanasia: A Moral Imperative。

Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, has long been a topic of ethical debate worldwide. Proponents argue that it is a compassionate choice for individuals suffering from incurable illnesses or unbearable pain, granting them the dignity of a peaceful death. I firmly support euthanasia as a fundamental human right and a morally justifiable act for several reasons.Firstly, euthanasia respects individual autonomy and self-determination. Every person has the right to make decisions about their own life, including the right to end it if they are facing terminal illness or intolerable suffering. Denying individuals the option of euthanasia deprives them of their autonomy and forces them to endure unnecessary pain and indignity against their will.Secondly, euthanasia is a manifestation of compassionand empathy towards those who are suffering. It offers a humane way to alleviate the physical and emotional distress of patients who have exhausted all treatment options and face a grim prognosis. Allowing them to end their lives with dignity and without prolonged agony is an act of kindness and mercy.Moreover, euthanasia can prevent unnecessary financial and emotional burdens on both patients and their families. Terminal illnesses often require extensive medical care and resources, placing a significant strain on healthcare systems and exhausting the savings of individuals and families. By opting for euthanasia, patients can avoid prolonged hospital stays and expensive treatments, freeing up resources for others in need and sparing their loved ones from witnessing their prolonged suffering.Critics of euthanasia often raise concerns about the potential for abuse and the slippery slope towards involuntary euthanasia. However, strict safeguards and regulations can be implemented to ensure that euthanasia is only carried out with the explicit consent of mentallycompetent patients who are facing unbearable suffering with no hope of improvement. Medical professionals can be involved in the decision-making process to verify the patient's condition and ensure that all other options, such as palliative care, have been explored.Furthermore, legalizing euthanasia can lead to greater transparency and accountability in end-of-life care. Currently, patients may resort to clandestine methods or unregulated practices to end their suffering, putting themselves at risk of botched attempts or inadequate pain management. Legalizing euthanasia allows for proper oversight and regulation, ensuring that patients receive the necessary support and guidance in making their end-of-life decisions.In conclusion, euthanasia is a compassionate andethical choice that respects the autonomy, dignity, and suffering of individuals facing terminal illness or unbearable pain. By legalizing euthanasia and implementing appropriate safeguards, society can uphold the principles of compassion, autonomy, and dignity in end-of-life care.It is time to recognize euthanasia as a fundamental human right and provide individuals with the option of a peaceful and dignified death when faced with unbearable suffering.。

安乐死的英文作文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成，希望大家下载以后，能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改，请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料，如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等，如想了解不同资料格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, is a highly controversial topic that has sparked heated debates around the world. Many people believe that individuals should have the right to end their own lives in the face of unbearable suffering, while others argue thatit goes against the sanctity of life.For those who support euthanasia, they argue that it is a compassionate way to end the suffering of those who are terminally ill or experiencing unbearable pain. They believe that individuals should have the right to make decisions about their own lives, including the choice to end it on their own terms.On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a person's life, regardless of the circumstances. They believe that every life is valuable and should be protected, and that legalizing euthanasia could lead to abuse and thedevaluation of human life.In some countries, euthanasia is legal under certain circumstances, while in others it is strictly prohibited. The ethical and moral implications of euthanasia continue to be a source of debate and disagreement, with no clear consensus in sight.Ultimately, the decision to legalize euthanasia is a complex and deeply personal issue that touches on questions of autonomy, compassion, and the value of human life. It is a topic that will continue to provoke strong emotions and impassioned arguments as society grapples with thedifficult questions it raises.。

第1篇一、案件背景张某，男，50岁，患有晚期肺癌，病情恶化，生活无法自理。

张某的妻子李某，女，45岁，一直陪伴在张某身边，悉心照料。

然而，张某在忍受病痛的折磨的同时，对生命失去了信心，多次提出要求安乐死。

李某在经过深思熟虑后，决定满足张某的愿望，帮助他结束痛苦的生命。

二、案件经过1. 张某与李某商议张某与李某在病床上进行了多次商议，讨论了安乐死的可行性。

张某表示，他已无法忍受病痛的折磨，希望能够结束生命。

李某在了解了张某的痛苦和绝望后，表示愿意帮助张某实现他的愿望。

2. 寻求医生支持为了确保安乐死的合法性和安全性，张某与李某找到了张某的主治医生。

医生在了解情况后，表示对张某的病情感到惋惜，但根据法律规定，医生不能参与安乐死。

3. 寻求法律援助在医生的建议下，张某与李某寻求了法律援助。

律师在了解了案件情况后，表示根据我国相关法律规定，安乐死在我国尚未合法化，因此无法提供法律支持。

4. 做出决定面对法律的限制，张某与李某深知无法通过合法途径实现安乐死。

在经过一番挣扎后，两人决定铤而走险，以生命为代价，满足张某的愿望。

三、案件处理1. 警方介入在张某与李某决定实施安乐死后，张某突然死亡。

李某被警方控制，案件迅速引起了社会的广泛关注。

2. 法院审理法院在审理过程中，对张某与李某的行为进行了调查和审理。

经过审理，法院认为张某与李某的行为构成故意杀人罪。

3. 判决结果法院根据《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百三十二条的规定，判处李某有期徒刑五年，缓刑三年。

对于张某，由于他已经去世，法院对其不再追究刑事责任。

四、案件反思1. 法律的局限性此案反映了我国法律在安乐死问题上的局限性。

尽管人们对安乐死有着广泛的讨论和关注，但我国法律尚未将其合法化，导致张某与李某在面临生命困境时无法通过合法途径解决问题。

2. 医疗伦理的挑战此案对医疗伦理提出了严峻的挑战。

在医生无法参与安乐死的情况下，患者和家属如何面对生命的困境，如何在尊重生命的同时，减轻患者的痛苦，成为了一个亟待解决的问题。

安乐死英语作文Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.Now many old people are suffering from the pain from incurable illness or torture from the weakening body, so much so that many of them are no longer willing to endure this way of living and want to terminate their life and leave this world peacefully and painlessly. Some suggest helping these old people by resorting to euthanasia.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion？Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.There exist totally four ways to go —sudden death, terminal illness, organ failure and frailty. Compared with suffering from pain and weakness, it is reasonable that some elders arrange their deaths by virtue of euthanasia. Reasonability though it has, euthanasia is still a debatable point when it comes to ethical and moral problems and spirit of law.To begin with, anyone supporting euthanasia shares a common humanity we know, sympathy. One of my relatives suffered sharp pain in the terminal stage of cancer and doctors injected her morphine to deaden it.Pitifully, she still passed away in torment. And this reminds me how important euthanasia is to cancer patients and others who is tortured by diseases and weakness. In brief, euthanasia does make sense to alleviate patients’ suffering and enable them to die peacefully.On the other hand, however, euthanasia is deliberate murder in essence. It involves a series of ethical and moral problemswhich arouse heated discussion for a long time. For example, some people argue that euthanasia actually encourages those psychologically vulnerable to die rather than old and weak ones. Other people hold that euthanasia means the insignificance of life existence. For human future, there are also opinions showing concern that euthanasia will hinder the development of medical research and empowering doctors to perform euthanasia will pose a negative impact on the whole health system. That is to say, patients may hesitate whether to follow their doctors’ advice when ‘doctor’ is equal to ‘executioner’.What’s more, the legitimation of euthanasia may appeal to intellectual crime. Patients not fully conscious, with counterfeit documents, criminals are easy to kill them in a legitimate process.In conclusion, a large number of ethical and moral problems are supposed to be settled before euthanasia is placed on the legislative agenda. Moreover, the legitimation of euthanasia deserves serious considerationas well, for loopholes in euthanasia law do not deal with reparable things, but fresh lives.。

Euthanasia should be illegalSubmitted by: XxxxxxEnglish WritingDecember 15, 2009OutlineThesis: Euthanasia should be illegal.(1)Introduction: the definition and general introduction of euthanasia is broughtabout.(2)The legality of euthanasia differs in different countries and more importanceshould be attached to ethics and moral principles.(3)From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for fourreasons.A.Some patients choose euthanasia just because of poverty.B.Some doctors may give up the efforts to save the sufferers if euthanasia ispermitted.C.The euthanasia may be used to murder the patients.D.No one should be denied the right to live.(4)A survey is introduced about people‟s attitude toward euthanasia.(5)Conclusion: euthanasia should be made illegal.Euthanasia should be illegalThe term …euthanasia‟ derives from the ancient Greek word euthanatos, meaning …easy death,‟ which combines eu …good‟ and thanatos …death‟. In Webster‟s dictionary euthan asia is defined as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy”（Pestalozzi 263）. Generally speaking, euthanasia is not a new problem, and until now, it is still a controversial issue. The euthanasia itself is a complex problem which covers so many fields, such as law, ethics, medical principle and so on.As to the legality of euthanasia, although euthanasia law was legalized in some west countries, such as Netherlands, which is the first country to make euthanasia legal, there is no definite legal provision to allow euthanasia in our country. To many of us, to perform euthanasia on the sufferer is no less than murdering. Of course, we have to admit that euthanasia can lessen the pain of the sufferer to a certain extent so that the patient can die without enduring so much pain. But, we should also realize that there are surely ethics and moral principles which we should attach more importance to.From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for four reasons. First, some sufferers, especially those in poverty, choose euthanasia just because they do not want the family to get involved into financial problems. As their family members, should we give up and see the one who are intimate to us die in desperate? The answer is of course not. What we should do is just to back them andencourage them. Second, if euthanasia is permitted, then some doctors may just give up the efforts to save the sufferer and abandon the patients to euthanasia, which may insult the essence and mission of the doctor. Third, in order to get the estates of the patients, the relatives of the sufferer and the doctor may take advantage of euthanasia to murder the patients. Fourth, life is given to us only once, thus, no one should be denied the right to die. Here, I would like to mention the euthanasia issue happened in Florida America. That is the story about Terri Schindler-Schiavo, who was in a condition of diminished consciousness since 1990. Although at last, she was disconnected from life support at the request of her husband, this event still drew much public attention and even the US government was involved (Wikipedia). Schindler-Schiavo has died, but the argumentation of her death and the argumentation about moral principles have not stopped.As to the attitudes towards euthanasia in general and attitudes towards legalization of euthanasia, doctor Radulovic and Mojsilovic had once made a survey among oncologists, home care physicians (family doctors), third-year medical students and lawyers. The result showed that more than half of the individuals (57%) were against euthanasia, and 61% are against the legalization of euthanasia (Radulovic and Mojsilovic 400-412). So, making efforts to reduce the pains of sufferer, trying our best to save the patient, showing more care to the patient, and improving the service of the hospital are really something more important than euthanasia.As to the legality of euthanasia, different people may have different opinions. But we should always believe that medical problems today may be solved tomorrow. Sothe sufferer should not be given up. As long as we have confidence, then everything is possible. Besides, euthanasia is to some extent against the ethics and is not widely accepted. So, euthanasia should be made illegal.Works cited:Pestalozzi, “Euthanasia: do we know it and do we need it?”, Support Care Cancer, no.10 (April 2002):263-264.Radulovic, Mojsilovic, “Attitudes of oncologists, family doctors, medical students and lawyers to euthanasia”, Support Care Cancer, no.6 (1998):410-415Terri Schiavo case, Wikipedia, /wiki/Terri_Schiavo: Accessed December 18, 2009。

安乐死的回顾与评述——兼论老年人权益范文第一篇：安乐死的回顾与评述——兼论老年人权益范文安乐死的回顾与评述——兼论老年人权益作者：侯佳伟来源：西北人口发布时间：2006-1-28 8:03:49 发布人：rtmart进入20世纪，人类对于生死的认识进入了一个新的层次，除了关注优生外，还关注优死。

20世纪50年代以来，围绕这一焦点，许多国家的医学界、法学界、伦理界一直在争论。

任何人都将面临生命的终结，但是对自己生命的终结是否具有自主权一直是一个探讨的焦点。

尤其是老年人这个群体，能否自主地选择如何死去对于他们是一个非常现实的问题。

一、概述1.安乐死的概念安乐死一词源出希腊文Euthanasia，是由美好和死亡两个词所组成。

其原意是指舒适或无痛苦地死亡、安然去世。

英文解释为：无痛苦处死患不治之症而又非常痛苦者和非常衰老者。

安乐死有广义和狭义之分。

广义安乐死包括一切因为身心原因致死、让其死亡以及自杀；狭义安乐死则把其局限于不治之症而又极端痛苦的人，即对死亡已经开始的病人，不对他们采取人工干预的办法来延长痛苦的死亡过程，或为了制止剧烈疼痛的折磨而采取积极的措施人为地加速其死亡过程。

安乐死作为一种特殊的死亡形式，现代意义上的安乐死至今尚无一个统一完整的定义。

《B1ack法律词典》认为安乐死是：“从怜悯出发，把患者不治之症和极端痛苦的人处死的行为或做法。

”美国医学会认为安乐死的通常定义是：“出于仁慈的原因以相对迅速的并且无痛的方式造成不治之症和病痛患者死亡的行为。

”《中国大百科全书?法学卷》对安乐死的定义是：“对于现代医学无可挽救的逼近死亡的病人，医生在患者本人真诚委托前提下，为减少病人难以忍受的剧烈痛苦，可以采取措施提前结束病人的生命。

”香港城市大学的陈浩文等认为，安乐死所指的“不是让患者尽量少痛苦和安详地死去，而是有意识地采取一些步骤与措施使患者死亡。

目的是令患者在无可克服的痛苦中得到解脱。

”中国社会科学院的邱仁宗和翟晓梅在通过分析了安乐死的对象、行动理由、死亡对象的意愿、行动与死亡的关系及实施方法后提出了以下定义：“安乐死是一种在临终患者的明确的请求下，为解除患者无可忍受的痛苦而由医生实施的对临终患者的死亡过程进行主动的医疗干预行为。

安乐死的英文作文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成，希望大家下载以后，能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。

文档下载后可定制随意修改，请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料，如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等，如想了解不同资料格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is a highly controversial topic that has sparked heated debates across the world. Many people believe that individuals should have the right to choose when and how they die, especially if they are suffering from a terminal illness or unbearable pain.However, there are also strong arguments against euthanasia. Some argue that it goes against the sanctity of life and opens the door to potential abuse, coercion, and the devaluation of human life. Others believe thatpalliative care and pain management can provide adequate relief for those who are suffering, without the need for euthanasia.For those who support euthanasia, they argue that it is a compassionate and humane way to end the suffering of those who are terminally ill. They believe that individuals should have the autonomy to make decisions about their ownlives, including the right to die with dignity.On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia argue that legalizing it could have dangerous consequences, such as putting vulnerable individuals at risk of being pressured into ending their lives prematurely. They also worry about the potential for slippery slope, where the practice of euthanasia could be extended to other vulnerable populations.In conclusion, the debate over euthanasia is complex and deeply divisive. Both sides present compelling arguments, and the issue raises important questions about autonomy, compassion, and the value of human life. Ultimately, it is a deeply personal and moral issue that will continue to provoke passionate discussions and debates in the years to come.。

安乐死的看法英语作文Euthanasia, derived from the Greek words 'eu' meaning good, and 'thanatos' meaning death, is a complex and controversial topic that has sparked intense debate across the globe. This essay aims to explore the various viewpoints surrounding euthanasia, considering its ethical, legal, and social implications.The Right to Die with DignityProponents of euthanasia argue that individuals should have the autonomy to decide the circumstances of their own death, especially when faced with terminal illness or unbearable suffering. They believe that a dignified death, free from prolonged pain and devoid of loss of personal dignity, is a fundamental human right. The concept of 'death with dignity' is central to this perspective, emphasizing the importance of personal choice and control over one's life.The Slippery Slope ArgumentOn the opposing side, critics of euthanasia often raise the 'slippery slope' concern. They fear that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a societal acceptance of endinglives under less stringent conditions, potentially leading to the exploitation of the elderly, disabled, or those with mental health issues. This perspective emphasizes thesanctity of life and the potential for abuse if euthanasiabecomes a societal norm.Medical Ethics and the Role of DoctorsThe role of medical professionals in euthanasia is also a point of contention. Doctors take an oath to do no harm (primum non nocere), and some argue that assisting in a patient's death violates this fundamental principle. However, others believe that the role of doctors should evolve with societal values and patient needs, allowing them to assist in ending a patient's suffering when all other options have been exhausted.Legal and Regulatory ChallengesLegally, euthanasia presents a myriad of challenges. Countries that have legalized euthanasia, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, have strict protocols to prevent abuse. However, there are concerns about the enforceability of these regulations and the potential for them to be misapplied. The legal debate often revolves around balancing the rights of individuals with the need to protect vulnerable populations.Religious and Cultural ConsiderationsReligious and cultural beliefs significantly influence attitudes towards euthanasia. Many religious doctrines teach the sanctity of life and prohibit actions that intentionally end a life. In contrast, some cultures may place a higher value on the quality of life and the relief of suffering,which can lead to more accepting views of euthanasia. ConclusionThe debate on euthanasia is multifaceted, involving deeplyheld personal beliefs, ethical considerations, and legal complexities. As society evolves, so too will the discourse surrounding this sensitive issue. It is crucial for lawmakers, medical professionals, and the public to engage in open and respectful dialogue to navigate the challenges thateuthanasia presents.In conclusion, while euthanasia elicits strong emotions and divergent views, it is a conversation that is vital to our understanding of human rights, medical ethics, and the value we place on life itself. As we continue to develop as a society, the perspectives on euthanasia will undoubtedly continue to shift and adapt, reflecting the ever-changing landscape of human values and needs.。