2015神经内科常用药
- 格式:ppt
- 大小:309.00 KB
- 文档页数:37


蚓激酶联合氟伐他汀治疗糖尿病合并脑梗死的疗效及对患者神经功能的影响邓君启; 王侠; 刘会芳; 金玉弟; 金凤; 张毅【期刊名称】《《检验医学与临床》》【年(卷),期】2019(016)019【总页数】5页(P2771-2774,2778)【关键词】神经功能; 脑梗死; 氟伐他汀; 蚓激酶【作者】邓君启; 王侠; 刘会芳; 金玉弟; 金凤; 张毅【作者单位】上海市金山区中西医结合医院神经内科上海201501; 上海市中医医院神经内科上海201500【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R743.33; R587.1糖尿病是一种常见的慢性疾病,随着人们饮食结构的改变,近年来其发病率不断升高。
研究表明,糖尿病合并脑梗死患者相比于非糖尿病脑梗死患者,神经缺损更严重,预后更差[1]。
目前,临床上糖尿病合并脑梗死的治疗尚无统一的标准,关于蚓激酶联合氟伐他汀治疗糖尿病合并脑梗死的研究也较少。
本研究通过对2016年8月至2018年8月上海市金山区中西医结合医院收治的122例糖尿病合并脑梗死患者的临床资料进行分析,探讨了糖尿病合并脑梗死患者采取蚓激酶联合氟伐他汀治疗的疗效,现报道如下。
1 资料与方法1.1 一般资料选取2016年8月至2018年8月本院收治的122例糖尿病合并脑梗死患者为研究对象,按照实际治疗方法分为对照组(n=62,采取常规治疗+氟伐他汀治疗)与观察组(n=60,采取常规治疗+蚓激酶联合氟伐他汀治疗)。
纳入标准:(1)符合《国家基层糖尿病防治管理指南(2018)》[2]及《中国急性缺血性脑卒中指南2018》[3]中脑梗死的诊断标准,脑梗死经影像学检查确诊,如颅脑CT、MRI 等,脑梗死起病至就诊时间<48 h,且为首次发生脑梗死。
排除标准:(1)肿瘤、脑出血、血液疾病;(2)严重心、肺、肝及肾功能不全;(3)入院前进行过溶栓治疗;(4)语言交流障碍、意识障碍。
观察组中,男32例,女28例;年龄55~75岁,平均(60.85±7.41)岁;病程2~42 h,平均(10.8±1.5)h;发病至入院时间为5~46 h,平均(17.5±1.9)h;病变部位包括基底节区梗死18例,多发性梗死14例,腔隙性脑梗死28例。
酒石酸唑吡坦与阿普唑仑治疗失眠症的成本-效果比较许琦【摘要】目的比较酒石酸唑吡坦与阿普唑仑治疗失眠症的成本-效果,为合理使用镇静催眠药提供参考.方法选择医院2015年12月至2017年5月确诊的失眠症患者97例,随机分为酒石酸唑吡坦(思诺思)组和阿普唑仑组.思诺思组采用酒石酸唑吡坦片(10 mg/d)治疗,阿普唑仑组采用阿普唑仑片(0.4 mg/d)治疗,均于入睡前连续服用,治疗7 d.采用睡眠障碍评定量表(SDRS)评分进行疗效评价.结果思诺思组和阿普唑仑组的有效率分别为74.00%和70.21%,差异无显著性(P>0.05);两组常见不良反应发生率比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05);思诺思组与阿普唑仑组的平均成本-效果比(C/E)为31.45和0.89,且没增加单位效果的思诺思组追加成本为614.0元,两组的成本效果比都小于追加成本,思诺思的疗效更好,治疗失眠具有经济性.结论思诺思与阿普唑仑均能有效治疗失眠症,但阿普唑仑组的成本较低,思诺思组的治疗效果较好,思诺思组成本-效果比更高,更具有经济性.%Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness of zolpidem tartrate and alprazolam in the treatment of insomnia, in order to provide a reference for rational use of sedatives and hypnotics. Methods Totally 97 patients with insomnia admitted to our hospital from December 2015 to May 2017 were selected and randomly divided into the zolpidem tartrate ( Stilnox ) group and the alprazolam group. The Stilnox group was treated with Zolpidem Tartrate Tablets ( 10 mg/d ) , while the alprazolam group was treated with Alprazolam Tablets ( 0. 4 mg/d ) , all the patients were continuously given 7 d of treatment before falling asleep. The curative effect was evaluated by SDRS score. Results The effective rates of the Stilnox group and the alprazolam groupwere 74. 00%, 70. 21%, respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P > 0. 05 ) , and there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups ( P > 0. 05 ) . The average C/ E of the Stilnox group and the alprazolam group were 31. 45, 0. 89, respectively, and the additional cost of Stilnox group without adding unit effectiveness was 614. 0 Yuan, the cost-effectiveness ratios of the two groups were less than the additional cost. However, the curative effect of Stilnox was better, so it is economical in the treatment of insomnia. Conclusion Stilnox and alprazolam were effective in the treatment of insomnia, the alprazolam group has lower cost, but the treatment effect of the Stilnox group is better, the C/ E is higher, and the economical efficiency is better.【期刊名称】《中国药业》【年(卷),期】2018(027)005【总页数】3页(P90-92)【关键词】阿普唑仑;唑吡坦;失眠症;成本-效果分析;敏感度分析;合理用药【作者】许琦【作者单位】山东省淄博市淄博化建医院神经内科,山东淄博 255438【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R971+.3;R969.3失眠症是一种常见的睡眠障碍性疾病,临床表现为入睡和维持睡眠都比较困难,睡眠质量较差[1]。