雅思作文分范文task

雅思Academic Task范文5篇（中英双语）第一篇：题目背景（Background）：假设任务一是关于描述柱状图，图表显示了不同国家的人口增长情况。

英文范文（English Version）：The given bar chart illustrates the population growth in various countries over a period of 50 years from 1970 to 2020. The countries included in the chart are China, India, the United States, Brazil, and Nigeria.From the chart, it is evident that China had the largest population in 1970, with approximately 800 million people. Over the next five decades, China's population steadily increased, reaching a peak of around 1.4 billion by 2020.India, on the other hand, had the second-largest population in 1970, with approximately 600 million people. Unlike China, India's population growth was more rapid, surpassing China's population in the early 2000s. By 2020, India had the highest population among the countries shown in the chart, with nearly 1.5 billion people.The United States, Brazil, and Nigeria had significantly smaller populations in 1970, ranging from 100 million to 150 million people. Over the years, all three countries experienced population growth, with the United States and Brazil showing relatively steady increases, whileNigeria's population surged rapidly. By 2020, the United States had a population of approximately 330 million, Brazil had around 220 million, and Nigeria had nearly 250 million.In conclusion, the bar chart highlights the population growth trends in China, India, the United States, Brazil, and Nigeria over a 50-year period. China and India, in particular, witnessed substantial increases in their populations, with India eventually surpassing China as the most populous country by 2020.中文范文（Chinese Version）：给定的柱状图展示了从1970年到2020年50年间各个国家的人口增长情况。

IELTS Task 1范文1.A glance at the graph provided reveals some striking similarities between the Chinese and US birth rates during the period from 1920 to 2000. It is evident that both nations saw considerable fluctuations in fertility, with lows during the 1940s and highs during the 1950s.1920 to15 percent in 1935, China’sThis was followed by a period of exponential growth, with fertility in the countrypercent in 1950.in this figure.The US birth rate, meanwhile, and 13 percentin 1950, followed by a steady fall.It is interesting to note that whileuntil 1950, the gap between the two after this time as fertility in China slid away.2.Given are two figures concerning criminality in Britain. The first provides data on the rates of conviction among men and women of various ages, while the second indicates the gender balance of the UK prison population.the rate of conviction among Britsof both during adolescence the age of about 20. men are far more likely to offend than women.From a negligible 2 percent among 10-year-old boys, the male conviction rateto approximately 20-year-olds. The percentage of0 percent among girls of 10 to some 5 percent for 20-year-olds. The however, see dramatic decreases in criminality among both sexes. A mere 2 percent of crimes are committed by 60-year-old men and 0 percent by women of the same age.As for the proportion of male and female prison inmates, men outnumber women 24 to 1. Some 96 percent of all prisioners are men, while the remainder are female.A glance at the two pie charts provided reveals the relative popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.Of these activities in both years, at 32 percent in 1985 and a slightly lower 30 percent in 1995. Yet, by far the most significant change to take place during this period was the increased popularity of computer games. Not a single respondent to the survey rated playing computer games as their preferred leisure activity in 1985. However, by 1995 this figure stood at 27 percent –the second highest overall. Also more popular in 1995 was talking with friends, at 26 percent compared to 21 percent a decade earlier.In stark contrast, however, all other activities decreased in popularity. Eating out –which was the second most widely enjoyed pastime in 1985,percent of respondents – slipped to a mere 8 percent in 1995. Likewisealso considerable decreases in the popularity ratings of talking withactivities and (as previously mentioned) watching television.4.Given are two figures providing a comparison of internet use in five European countries (namely Switzerland, Germany, France, Spain and the UK) in 1995, 2000 and 2004, as well as the popularity of internet shopping in these countries.It is evident from the information provided that Britain had by far the highest number of internet users in all three years. From 16 million in 1995, the number of British users climbed steadily to 22 million in 2000, before soaring to a staggering 41 million in 2004. Second in terms of internet use was Germany. This country saw a threefold increase during the period in question, from 5 million people in 1995 to 14 million in 2000 and 15 million in 2004. A similar increase took place in France. The two nations with the fewest internet users, meanwhile, were Switzerland and Spain. It is also interesting to note that internet shopping was far more common in the UK than in any other country listed.In fact, the prevalence of internet shopping in Britain was double that of Germany and triple that of Switzerland. France and Spain, meanwhile, had moderate levels of online shopping.A glance at the table provided reveals a number of clear differences between the major metro systems of the world in terms of age, scale and annual carrying capacity.One particularly interesting fact highlighted by the figure is that the more recently established metro systems are considerably shorter than the older ones. Completed in 1863, the London underground is the oldestthe longest, extending for 1100 kilometres.stark contrast, howeverand 2001 respectively– are far shorter. The formerthe latter just 14 kilometre s.With regard to yearly carrying capacity, the metro systems mentioned in the table vary greatly. The Tokyo metro is equipped to carry the largest number of passengers, at 1434 million. With 850 million, meanwhile, the Paris metro has the second largest carrying capacity. The systems with the smallest capacities are those of Kyoto and Washington DC, transporting just 11 million and 70 million people per year respectively.6.Given are two column graphs comparing the rates of secondary and tertiary education among males and females in various different parts of the world.compared with only 20 Asia, meanwhile, have moderate levels of secondary education – between 40 and 50 percent for both sexes.With regard to higher education, the figures are much lower throughout the world. In Europe, some 50 percent of adult females and 45 percent of adult males gain a higher education.Sub-Saharan Africa The figures for Latin America and East Asia are marginally higher thanAlso noteworthy is the fact that receive a secondary education in all regions except East Asia, but less likely to receive a tertiary education in all regions except Europe.。

2022年4月16日雅思写作范文Task 2题目（大概）：在现代社会，很多人通过网络获取新闻，这是否会对人们的生活产生消极影响？范文：In this digital age, a whole bunch of people are getting their news fix from the Internet. Well, it's like a double edged sword when it comes to whether it has a negative impact on our lives.On the one hand, there are some not so great things about relying on the Internet for news. First off, the Internet is flooded with all kinds of news sources, and not all of them are reliable. It's like a wild west out there. You might come across some click bait news that's just made up to get views. For example, there are those so called "exclusive" stories about celebrities that turn out to be total fabrications. This can mislead the public big time and make people believe things that are just not true.Another problem is that with the constant stream of news online, it can be overwhelming. We're bombarded with so much information all day long.It's like a never ending tsunami of news. People can get stressed outtrying to keep up with it all. And sometimes, this overexposure to negative news, like disasters and crimes from all over the world, can make people feel anxious and gloomy. It's as if the world is always on the verge of falling apart according to the news we see.However, on the flip side, getting news from the Internet also has its perks. For starters, it's super convenient. You can access the latest news right from your phone or computer, whether you're on the bus, having a coffee break, or just lazing around at home. It's like having a newsstand in your pocket.Also, the Internet gives us a wider range of news. We can learn about not only local news but also international events, from political upheavals in far flung countries to the latest scientific breakthroughs. It broadens our horizons and makes us more aware of the world around us. In a way, it connects us to the global community.In conclusion, while getting news from the Internet can have some negative impacts like misinformation and information overload, it also has positive aspects such as convenience and a broader perspective. So, it's not all doom and gloom. We just need to be a bit more discerning when we're surfing the news online. We should check the credibility of the sources and not let the news consume us completely.。

001Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.001People have differing views with regard to the question of how to make our roads safer. In my view, both punishments and a range of other measures can be used together to promote better driving habits.On the one hand, strict punishments can certainly help to encourage people to drive more safely. Penalties for dangerous drivers can act as a deterrent, meaning that people avoid repeating the same offence. There are various types of driving penalty, such as small fines, licence suspension, driver awareness courses, and even prison sentences. The aim of these punishments is to show dangerous drivers that their actions have negative consequences. As a result, we would hope that drivers become more disciplined and alert, and that they follow the rules more carefully.On the other hand, I believe that safe driving can be promoted in several different ways that do not punish drivers. Firstly, it is vitally important to educate people properly before they start to drive, and this could be done in schools or even as part of an extended or more difficult driving test. Secondly, more attention could be paid to safe road design. For example, signs can be used to warn people, speed bumps and road bends can be added to calm traffic, and speed cameras can help to deter people from driving too quickly. Finally, governments or local councils could reduce road accidents by investing in better public transport, which would mean that fewer people would need to travel by car.In conclusion, while punishments can help to prevent bad driving, I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduced.002Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?002Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.003Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?003Humans are responsible for a variety of environmental problems, but we can also take steps to reduce the damage that we are causing to the planet. This essay will discuss environmental problems and the measures that governments and individuals can take to address these problems.Two of the biggest threats to the environment are air pollution and waste. Gas emissions from factories and exhaust fumes from vehicles lead to global warming, which may have a devastating effect on the planet in the future. As the human population increases, we are also producing ever greater quantities of waste, which contaminates the earth and pollutes rivers and oceans.Governments could certainly make more effort to reduce air pollution. They could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories or to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. They could also impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline companies. In this way, people would be encouraged to use public transport and to take fewer flights abroad, therefore reducing emissions.Individuals should also take responsibility for the impact they have on the environment. They can take public transport rather than driving, choose products with less packaging, and recycle as much as possible. Most supermarkets now provide reusable bags for shoppers as well as ‘banks’ for recycling glass, plastic and paper in their car parks. By reusing and recycling, we can help to reduce waste.In conclusion, both national governments and individuals must play their part in looking after the environment.004Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both these views and give your opinion.004It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that these languages should be protected and preserved.There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, if a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to make sure that more people learn it, and the state will have to pay for facilities, teachers and marketing. This money might be better spent on other public services. Secondly, it would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries to have just one language. Governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.005Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion.005When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduateshave access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.006Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion.006People have different views about the role and function of museums. In my opinion, museums can and should be both entertaining and educational.On the one hand, it can be argued that the main role of a museum is to entertain. Museums are tourist attractions, and their aim is to exhibit a collection of interesting objects that many people will want to see. The average visitor may become bored if he or she has to read or listen to too much educational content, so museums often put more of an emphasis on enjoyment rather than learning. This type of museum is designed to be visually spectacular, and may have interactive activities or even games as part of its exhibitions.On the other hand, some people argue that museums should focus on education. The aim of any exhibition should be to teach visitors something that they did not previously know. Usually this means that the history behind the museum’s exhibits needs to be explained, and this can be done in various ways. Some museums employ professional guides to talk to their visitors, while other museums offer headsets so that visitors can listen to detailed commentary about the exhibition. In this way, museums can play an important role in teaching people about history, culture, science and many other aspects of life.In conclusion, it seems to me that a good museum should be able to offer an interesting, enjoyable and educational experience so that people can have fun and learn something at the same time.007Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?007In my opinion, men and women should have the same educational opportunities. However, I do not agree with the idea of accepting equal proportions of each gender in every university subject.Having the same number of men and women on all degree courses is simply unrealistic. Studentnumbers on any course depend on the applications that the institution receives. If a university decided to fill courses with equal numbers of males and females, it would need enough applicants of each gender. In reality, many courses are more popular with one gender than the other, and it would not be practical to aim for equal proportions. For example, nursing courses tend to attract more female applicants, and it would be difficult to fill these courses if fifty per cent of the places needed to go to males.Apart from the practical concerns expressed above, I also believe that it would be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. Universities should continue to select the best candidates for each course according to their qualifications. In this way, both men and women have the same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful if they work hard to achieve good grades at school. If a female student is the best candidate for a place on a course, it is surely wrong to reject her in favour of a male student with lower grades or fewer qualifications.In conclusion, the selection of university students should be based on merit, and it would be both impractical and unfair to change to a selection procedure based on gender.008Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable.To what extent do you agree or disagree?008Some hobbies are relatively easy, while others present more of a challenge. Personally, I believe that both types of hobby can be fun, and I therefore disagree with the statement that hobbies need to be difficult in order to be enjoyable.On the one hand, many people enjoy easy hobbies. One example of an activity that is easy for most people is swimming. This hobby requires very little equipment, it is simple to learn, and it is inexpensive. I remember learning to swim at my local swimming pool when I was a child, and it never felt like a demanding or challenging experience. Another hobby that I find easy and fun is photography. In my opinion, anyone can take interesting pictures without knowing too much about the technicalities of operating a camera. Despite being straightforward, taking photos is a satisfying activity.On the other hand, difficult hobbies can sometimes be more exciting. If an activity is more challenging, we might feel a greater sense of satisfaction when we manage to do it successfully. For example, film editing is a hobby that requires a high level of knowledge and expertise. In my case, it took me around two years before I became competent at this activity, but now I enjoy it much more than I did when I started. I believe that many hobbies give us more pleasure when we reach a higher level of performance because the results are better and the feeling of achievement is greater.In conclusion, simple hobbies can be fun and relaxing, but difficult hobbies can be equally pleasurable for different reasons.009Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?009It is true that new technologies have had an influence on communication between people. Technology has affected relationships in various ways, and in my opinion there are both positive and negative effects.Technology has had an impact on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, telephones and the Internet allow business people in different countries to interact without ever meeting each other. Secondly, services like Skype create new possibilities for relationships between students and teachers. For example, a student can now take video lessons with a teacher in a different city or country. Finally, many people use social networks, like Facebook, to make new friends and find people who share common interests, and they interact through their computers rather than face to face.On the one hand, these developments can be extremely positive. Cooperation between people in different countries was much more difficult when communication was limited to written letters or telegrams. Nowadays, interactions by email, phone or video are almost as good as face-to-face meetings, and many of us benefit from these interactions, either in work or social contexts. On the other hand, the availability of new communication technologies can also have the result of isolating people and discouraging real interaction. For example, many young people choose to make friends online rather than mixing with their peers in the real world, and these ‘virtual’ relationships are a poor substitute for real friendships.In conclusion, technology has certainly revolutionised communication between people, but not all of the outcomes of this revolution have been positive.010We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?010Some people believe that we should not help people in other countries as long as there are problems in our own society. I disagree with this view because I believe that we should try to help as many people as possible.On the one hand, I accept that it is important to help our neighbors and fellow citizens. In most communities there are people who are impoverished or disadvantaged in some way. It is possible to find homeless people, for example, in even the wealthiest of cities, and for those who are concerned about this problem, there are usually opportunities to volunteer time or give money tosupport these people. In the UK, people can help in a variety of ways, from donating clothing to serving free food in a soup kitchen. As the problems are on our doorstep, and there are obvious ways to help, I can understand why some people feel that we should prioritise local charity.At the same time, I believe that we have an obligation to help those who live beyond our national borders. In some countries the problems that people face are much more serious than those in our own communities, and it is often even easier to help. For example, when children are dying from curable diseases in African countries, governments and individuals in richer countries can save lives simply by paying for vaccines that already exist. A small donation to an international charity might have a much greater impact than helping in our local area.In conclusion, it is true that we cannot help everyone, but in my opinion national boundaries should not stop us from helping those who are in need.011In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations.011It is true that people in industrialised nations can expect to live longer than ever before. Although there will undoubtedly be some negative consequences of this trend, societies can take steps to mitigate these potential problems.As people live longer and the populations of developed countries grow older, several related problems can be anticipated. The main issue is that there will obviously be more people of retirement age who will be eligible to receive a pension. The proportion of younger, working adults will be smaller, and governments will therefore receive less money in taxes in relation to the size of the population. In other words, an ageing population will mean a greater tax burden for working adults. Further pressures will include a rise in the demand for healthcare, and the fact young adults will increasingly have to look after their elderly relatives.There are several actions that governments could take to solve the problems described above. Firstly, a simple solution would be to increase the retirement age for working adults, perhaps from 65 to 70. Nowadays, people of this age tend to be healthy enough to continue a productive working life. A second measure would be for governments to encourage immigration in order to increase the number of working adults who pay taxes. Finally, money from national budgets will need to be taken from other areas and spent on vital healthcare, accommodation and transport facilities for the rising numbers of older citizens.In conclusion, various measures can be taken to tackle the problems that are certain to arise as the populations of countries grow older.012Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits?012Many people, and children in particular, enjoy playing computer games. While I accept that these games can sometimes have a positive effect on the user, I believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact.On the one hand, video games can be both entertaining and educational. Users, or gamers, are transported into virtual worlds which are often more exciting and engaging than real-life pastimes. From an educational perspective, these games encourage imagination and creativity, as well as concentration, logical thinking and problem solving, all of which are useful skills outside the gaming context. Furthermore, it has been shown that computer simulation games can improve users’ motor skills and help to prepare them for real-world tasks, such as flying a plane.However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Gaming can be highly addictive because users are constantly given scores, new targets and frequent rewards to keep them playing. Many children now spend hours each day trying to progress through the levels of a game or to get a higher score than their friends. This type of addiction can have effects ranging from lack of sleep to problems at school, when homework is sacrificed for a few more hours on the computer or console. The rise in obesity in recent years has also been linked in part to the sedentary lifestyle and lack of exercise that often accompany gaming addiction.In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more significant than the possible benefits.013Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.Do you agree or disagree?013Many young people work on a volunteer basis, and this can only be beneficial for both the individual and society as a whole. However, I do not agree that we should therefore force all teenagers to do unpaid work.Most young people are already under enough pressure with their studies, without being given the added responsibility of working in their spare time. School is just as demanding as a full-time job, and teachers expect their students to do homework and exam revision on top of attending lessons every day. When young people do have some free time, we should encourage them to enjoy it with their friends or to spend it doing sports and other leisure activities. They have many years of workahead of them when they finish their studies.At the same time, I do not believe that society has anything to gain from obliging young people to do unpaid work. In fact, I would argue that it goes against the values of a free and fair society to force a group of people to do something against their will. Doing this can only lead to resentment amongst young people, who would feel that they were being used, and parents, who would not want to be told how to raise their children. Currently, nobody is forced to volunteer, and this is surely the best system.In conclusion, teenagers may choose to work for free and help others, but in my opinion we should not make this compulsory.014Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.014People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.015Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits tohumanity.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.015It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.016When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?016Many people choose their jobs based on the size of the salary offered. Personally, I disagree with the idea that money is the key consideration when deciding on a career, because I believe that other factors are equally important.On the one hand, I agree that money is necessary in order for people to meet their basic needs. For example, we all need money to pay for housing, food, bills, health care, and education. Most people consider it a priority to at least earn a salary that allows them to cover these needs and have a reasonable quality of life. If people chose their jobs based on enjoyment or other non-financial factors, they might find it difficult to support themselves. Artists and musicians, for instance, are known for choosing a career path that they love, but that does not always provide them with enough money to live comfortably and raise a family.Nevertheless, I believe that other considerations are just as important as what we earn in our jobs.。

一．Some people contend（认为）that advertising has positive impact on society while others think it also has negative influence. Discuss.开头段⑴Advertising has become prevalent in the contemporary society and vast billboards, TV commercials and leaflets（传单）are all exerting profound impact on modern life. ⑵In the meantime, whether advertising is a blessing or a curse has sparked spirited (激烈的)debate. ⑶Some people argu e （认为）that advertising has only beneficial influence on our lives while many others contend that it has detrimental （有害的）effect as well. （改写原题观点，如果原题中只有一个观点，最好把相反的观点写出来。

）⑷Personally, I am in favor of the former (latter) view. （表示自己的观点）表示利与弊的英文：advantages and disadvantages strengths and weaknesses the upside and the downside / pros and cons / boons and banes主体段1Admittedly, advertising may also carry considerable potential drawbacks. ⑴To begin with, a vast number o f online advertisements may harm the Internet users’ lives. ⑵To illustrate, email spamming （群发）may fill up one’s email box with junk emails and worse yet, （递进）many of these junk emails could destroy PCs with viruses or Trojan horses. ⑶Moreover, a high percentage of advertisements in the media are misleading ones. ⑷Today, it seems that many drug companies give false information about their products, which has rendered （让……变成什么状态）a host of customers afraid to buy medicine.主体段2Despite this, advertising has brought numerous benefits. ⑴In the first place, advertisements inform us about the latest products on the market. ⑵In general, with the help of ads, customers can make shopping more economical and less time-consuming.⑶In the second place, elaborate （包含了很多劳动，变成了精心制作）advertisements can be a genuine art form. ⑷Indeed, instead of wasting our time, creative ads can afford us diverse amusements, thereby （后面是动名词）immensely brightening up our lives. ⑸Last but not least, some advertising in the media can motivate people to contribute to charities. ⑹As a matter of fact, I would be hard-pressed to imagine how charities can get enough funds without the help of non-profit ads. （我很难想象相反的事情发生）结尾段⑴In the final analysis, I concede that the proliferation （扩散）of the advertising industry does not come without any adverse effects. (概括让步段的观点)⑵However, the benefits created by advertising far outweigh the disadvantages. （说清楚自己更倾向的观点）⑶Overall, I am convinced that we should further promote the development of advertising and meanwhile get this industry better-regulated.二．Today PC games are very popular among teenagers. But some parents consider that these games are not instructive and that teenagers should be kept away from them. What do you think?As one of the products of modern technology, PC games have definitely become an indispensable part of most teenagers’ lives. Statistics show that teenagers are spending more time and money on entertainment items such as PC games than they did ten years ago. However, in my opinion, although PC games have certain positive effects such as giving teenagers relaxation and activating their imaginations, they have certain negative effects.First, PC games occupy the time when teenagers should be sitting in the classroom or studying in the library. The colorful pictures and vivid characters of PC games are far more exciting than the dull black letters in textbooks. Therefore, addiction to PC games is often accompanied by poor academic work.Furthermore, far from being instructive, some PC games contain violence and pornography, which are extremely harmful for the healthy growth of teenagers. It is said that most juvenile delinquents commit crimes just because their PC game heroes do so in a virtual-reality world.In addition, speaking from the physical aspect, PC games have contributed a lot to failing eyesight among teenagers in recent years.To sum up, despite their entertainment and relaxation values, PC games interfere with the education of teenagers. It would be better if teenagers could use such games in a more rational and controlled way, perhaps under the supervision of their parents.雅思考官九分范文Writing Task 2You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced?It is true that in almost every country today each family produces a large amount of waste every week. Most of the rubbish comes from the packaging of the things we buy, such as processed food. However, even if we buy food without packaging, we still produce rubbish from the plastic bags that are used everywhere.The first reason why we have so much packaging is that we consume so much more every day than families did in the past. Also, convenience is very important in modern life; therefore, we buy packaged food that can be transported over long distances and store it until we need it, at first in the supermarket, then at home.Further, the amount of waste produced is also a result of our habit of using something once and throw it away. We forget that even the cheapest plastic bag has used valuable resources and energy. Above all, we also forget that it is a source of pollution and difficult to dealwith.Therefore, I think that governments need to raise this awareness in the general public. Children should be educated about environmental issues at school while adults need to take action. Governments can encourage such action by collecting taxes on packaging, such as plastic bags and fining families and shops that do not try to recycle their Waste.。

2023最新雅思写作Task 2范文题目：Some people believe that technology has made our lives more complicated, while others feel that it has had the opposite effect. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.雅思写作Task 2范文Technology has become an increasingly ubiquitous presence in our daily lives, and its impact on our wellbeing is a topic of much debate. While some individuals believe that technology has made our lives unnecessarily complex, many others argue that it has had a positive impact on our lives. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before drawing a conclusion.On the one hand, detractors of technology argue that it has made our lives more complicated. Firstly, they point out that social media and other forms of digital communication can be a source of stress, as people feel pressure to be constantly connected and responsive to messages. Secondly, they argue that the sheer amount of information available online is overwhelming, making it difficult to filter useful information from the noise. This can lead to anxiety and a feeling of being constantly bombarded with choices.However, supporters of technology argue that it has madeour lives easier and more convenient in a number of ways. For instance, technology has enabled us to work remotely, freeing us from the constraints of a fixed location and a rigid work schedule. Additionally, online shopping and the ability to access information from anywhere have become increasingly popular and convenient. Moreover, technology has enabled us to stay connected with friends, family and colleagues easily, even when separated by geography or time zones.In my opinion, while technology has certainly made our lives more complex in some ways, it has actually had a net positive impact on our wellbeing. The ability to communicate and access information from anywhere has given us greater choice and flexibility in our lives, and it has enabled us to work more efficiently and effectively. While it is true that some people may feel overwhelmed by the amount of information and communication options available through technology, this is ultimately a problem of moderation and self-control.In conclusion, while some people argue that technology has made our lives unnecessarily complicated, I believe that its benefits outweigh its disadvantages. Technology has had a positive impact on our lives by improving our ability to communicate, work, learn and stay connected, and it will continue to do so as long as we use it responsibly.。

2021年3月4日雅思写作范文Task 1（小作文：柱状图为例）The bar chart shows the number of visitors to four different museums in a city during the year 2019.Looking at the chart, it's clear that there are significant differences among the four museums in terms of the number of visitors.The Museum of Art seems to be the most popular one. In January, it welcomed around 800 visitors. And this number fluctuated throughout the year but remained relatively high. It had a peak of about 1200 visitors in July, probably because it might have some special art exhibitions during the summer months. Even in the least visited month, which was December with around 600 visitors, it still outnumbered the other museums in that particular month.The Science Museum also had a decent number of visitors. Starting from around 400 in January, it gradually increased until it reached about 900 in October. However, compared to the Museum of Art, its overall numbers were lower.The History Museum was not as popular as the first two. It had a relatively stable number of visitors, hovering around 300 400 throughout the year. There were no significant spikes or drops, which might suggest that it lacked some special events or attractions to draw more crowds.The least popular was the Local Folklore Museum. It had the lowest number of visitors all year round. In January, it only had about 100 visitors, and it never really got much higher. In fact, it struggled to reach 300 visitors even in its best performing month.Overall, the Museum of Art was the star in terms of attracting visitors in 2019, while the Local Folklore Museum really needs to find ways to boost its popularity, like maybe creating more interactive exhibits or doing more advertising.Task 2（大作文：以“Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”为例）Well, when it comes to improving road safety, the idea of increasing the minimum legal driving age is quite a controversial one.On one hand, I can see why some people think it could be a good idea. Younger people are generally less experienced in life, and that inexperience can translate to being less cautious on the road. For example, a 16 year old might be more likely to take risks while driving, like speeding or not paying full attention to traffic rules, just because they haven't fully grasped the seriousness of driving. If we increase the minimum age, say to 18 or even 20, those new drivers would have had more time to mature and understand the importance of safety. Also, they might have had more general life experience that could make them better decision makers behind the wheel.On the other hand, increasing the minimum legal age is not a panaceafor all road safety problems. There are plenty of older drivers who also cause accidents. Some might have bad driving habits that they've developed over the years, or they could be driving while distracted by things like mobile phones. So, just focusing on the age of new drivers doesn't really address the root causes of all road accidents.Moreover, there are other ways to improve road safety that are just as important, if not more so. For instance, better driver education programscould be implemented. These could include more in depth training on handling different road conditions, understanding vehicle mechanics, and dealing with emergency situations. Also, stricter enforcement of traffic laws for all drivers, regardless of age, would be a great step forward. If people knew that they would be severely punished for breaking the rules, they might be more careful.In conclusion, while increasing the minimum legal driving age might have some benefits in terms of improving road safety, it's not the best way on its own. A combination of better driver education, stricter law enforcement, and other safety measures is what we really need to make our roads safer for everyone.。

2022年4月16日雅思写作范文Task 1（如果是图表题，由于没有具体图表信息，我假设一个常见的柱状图来写示例）The bar chart illustrates the number of visitors to three different museums in a certain city during the four seasons of a year.Well, let's first take a look at Museum A. In spring, it had arelatively moderate number of visitors, say around 300. Then, as theweather got warmer and sunnier in summer, the number of visitors shot up to about 500. It seems that people like to combine their museum visiting with their summer outings. However, when autumn came, the number dropped back down to around 350. And in winter, it was the least popular time for Museum A, with only about 200 visitors. Maybe it was because the cold weather made people less willing to go out.Now, turn to Museum B. It had a different pattern. In spring, it hadthe highest number of visitors among the four seasons for this museum, reaching nearly 450. But then in summer, the number decreased to around 350. Autumn saw a small increase to about 400, and in winter, it dropped to around 300. It's a bit strange, isn't it? Maybe Museum B had some special exhibitions in spring that attracted a lot of people.Finally, Museum C. Throughout the year, the number of visitors was relatively stable. In spring, there were about 350 visitors. In summer, it was around 380. In autumn, it was 360, and in winter, it was 330. It seems that Museum C has a steady group of fans who visit it no matter what the season is.Overall, we can see that different museums have different popularity trends across the seasons. Museum A is more affected by the weather andseasons, while Museum B has some unique fluctuations, and Museum C is the most stable.Task 2（假设是一个关于社会现象的话题，比如：Some people think that the government should spend more money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness. To what extent do you agree or disagree?）In this day and age, there's a lot of talk about whether the government should fork out more cash to promote a healthy lifestyle and keep diseases at bay. Well, I'm all for it, and here's why.First off, prevention is better than cure, right? If the government pumps more money into promoting healthy living, like telling people to eat more fruits and veggies, exercise regularly, and not smoke, it can save a whole lot of money in the long run. Just think about how much it costs to treat people with serious diseases like cancer or heart problems. If we can stop these diseases from happening in the first place by getting people to live healthier, it's like hitting two birds with one stone. We not only make people healthier, but we also save the government's purse from getting drained by those expensive medical treatments.Secondly, a healthy population is a happy and productive population. When people are fit as a fiddle, they can work better, study better, and generally contribute more to society. For example, if more people are in good shape, there will be fewer sick days at work, and companies will be more efficient. And students will be more alert in class and get better grades. It's like a positive cycle that just keeps on giving.Some might argue that the government has other important things to spend money on, like building roads or schools. But hey, promoting a healthy lifestyle doesn't have to cost an arm and a leg. It can be as simple as putting up posters in public places, having free health check upsin local communities, or running some cheap fitness classes in parks. These small things can make a big difference.So, all in all, I think the government should really open up its wallet a bit more when it comes to promoting a healthy lifestyle. It's an investment that will pay off in spades in the future.。

雅思（IELTS）是国际英语语言测试系统（International English Language Testing System）的英文缩写，是被全球认可的用于衡量非母语国家人员英语水平的考试。

雅思考试分为四个部分，分别是听力、阅读、写作和口语。

其中，写作部分包括两个任务，分别是任务1和任务2。

今天我们来看一下雅思写作任务2的范文。

雅思写作任务2要求考生在规定的时间内写一篇至少250字的短文，内容要求考生对一个观点或问题进行讨论。

写作范文的质量对考生的分数有很大影响，因此选择一个优秀的范文进行学习和参考是非常重要的。

范文题目：Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems, people should be encouraged to use bicycles instead of cars and motorcycles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?1. 引言部分交通和运输问题是当今社会面临的一个严重挑战。

有人认为，为了解决这一问题，人们应该被鼓励使用自行车而不是汽车和摩托车。

本文将探讨这一观点，分析自行车在解决交通问题中的作用和影响。

2. 自行车的优势自行车具有环保的特点。

使用自行车不会产生尾气和噪音污染，有利于改善环境质量。

骑自行车可以锻炼身体，有益健康。

另外，自行车还能够在拥挤的城市道路上快速穿行，解决交通拥堵问题。

3. 自行车的局限性然而，自行车并非适用于所有的交通出行场景。

在长距离通勤或运输大量货物时，自行车显然不太实用。

而且，自行车在恶劣天气条件下无法正常使用，如暴雨、大雪等。

在某些特定情况下，自行车并不能完全取代汽车和摩托车。

4. 观点总结在解决交通和运输问题时，鼓励人们使用自行车是一种行之有效的途径。

自行车具有环保、健康和疏通交通的优点，可以缓解城市面临的交通压力。

雅思写作8.5分范文：剑桥雅思12 G类Test 7 Task 2Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities in their free time. Other say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.绿色：高分连接词黄色：重复词需替换Unquestionably, every coin has two sides and so it is humans too. Society is divided over the topic of how kids should spend their leisure time. Some argue that children, when time permits, should engage in team-building activities, whereas others are of the opinion that they should be left independently to decide how they want to spend their free periods of time. In my essay, both viewpoints will be discussed in detail along with my own opinion and a sensible conclusion.Initiating with the points that support the first school of thought, firstly, kids who engage in group activities learn how to function as a part of a team. It will help them in their careers in the future. For example, playing team sports will teach them how to adjust, sacrifice and provide collective effort, which are important life skills that areuseful in work life. Another benefit that parents argue is social inclusion. They say that they learn how society functions, behaviour in various social situations, etc. To cite an instance, toddlers and adolescents who do not engage with their peers, grow up to be socially awkward and are considered recluses. This point is supported by many psychologists too. As a result, mothers and fathers encourage their wards to play with others.On the contrary, people who support other points of view say that children should learn, on their own, how to spend time. They believe that such treatment inculcates independent thinking and non-reliance on others. This promotes problem-solving capabilities by learning from mistakes. To cite an example, it is a fact that children from North America region are more independent than their counterparts in South-East Asia. They are able to travel alone, feed themselves, and learn about new subjects, because they are not reliant on their parents.To conclude, my opinion is that both thought processes have their pros and cons. Therefore, it will be best to provide exposure to both for holistic development. However, it will depend on the mindset of the people and which point of view is favoured by them.。