现代人力资源管理-英文文献翻译

aGAOUnited States General Accounting OfficeReport to Congressional Requesters February 2003 HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT FAA’s Reform Effort Requires a More Strategic ApproachGAO-03-156In 1996, FAA initiated human capital reform initiatives in three broad areas,some of which required exemption from title 5, and some of which havebeen fully implemented. FAA has not yet completed implementation ofsome key initiatives. For example, FAA’s new compensation systemremains unimplemented for about one-quarter o f the agency’s workforce—those staff whose unions have not reached agreements with FAA. FAA’sneed to implement initiatives among a workforce with a wide range of skillsand to negotiate changes with multiple unions were among factors thataffected the pace and extent of reform implementation.Selected Initiatives within the Three Areas of FAA’s Reform, Including Whether anExemption from Title 5 Was Required and Implementation StatusFAA had little data with which to assess the effects of its reform effort.While FAA human capital officials cited positive effects of FAA’s reformeffort, the views of managers and employees GAO interviewed weregenerally less positive.FAA’s lack of empirical data on the effects of its human capital initiatives is one indication that it has not fully incorporated elements that are important to effective human capital management into its overall reform effort. These elements include data collection and analysis, performance goals and measures, and linkage of reform goals to program goals. FAA human resource management officials said that the agency should have spent more time to develop baseline data and performance measures before implementing the broad range of reforms but that establishing these elements was a complex and difficult task. FAA has also not gone far enough in establishing linkage between reform goals and overall program goals of the organization. GAO found that the lack of these elements has been pointed out repeatedly in evaluations of FAA’s human capital refor m effort, but FAA has not developed specific steps and time frames by which these elements will be established and used for evaluation. Incorporation of these elements could also help FAA build accountability into its human capital management approach.HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT FAA’s Reform Effort Requires a More Strategic Approach/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03-156.To view the full report, including the scopeand methodology, click on the link above.For more information, contact GeraldDillingham, Ph.D., at (202) 512-2834 ordillinghamg@.Highlights of GAO-03-156, a report to theChairman, Subcommittee on Aviation,House Committee on Transportation andInfrastructure; Chairman, HouseCommittee on Government Reform; andanother requesterIn 1996, the Federal AviationAdministration (FAA) undertook ahuman capital reform effort underone of the most flexible humancapital management environmentsin the federal government,including broad exemptions fromtitle 5 laws governing federalcivilian personnel management.GAO was asked (1) to examine thechanges FAA initiated in its reformeffort, including whether theyrequired an exemption from title 5and their implementation status;(2) determine the effects of thereform effort according to availabledata and the views of FAA officials,managers, and employees; and (3)assess the extent to which FAA’sreform effort incorporatedelements that are important toeffective human capitalmanagement.This report makesrecommendations to enable FAA todevelop a more strategic approachto its reform effort. By buildingelements that are important toeffective human capitalmanagement into its approach,FAA will be better able to evaluatethe effects of its initiatives, use theevaluations as a basis for anystrategic improvements, and holdagency leadership accountable.FAA will also be better able toshare its results with other federalagencies and Congress.The Department of Transportationand FAA officials generally agreedwith our recommendations.Page i GAO-03-156 Human Capital Management ContentsLetter 1Results in Brief 3Background 6FAA Initiated Personnel Changes in Three Broad Areas, Some of Which Required Exemptions from Title 5 9Key Elements of Personnel Reform Have Not Yet Been Fully Implemented 17FAA Had Little Data on Reform’s Effects, and Views of FAA Officials Often Differed from Views of Managers and Employees WeInterviewed 24FAA Has Not Fully Incorporated Elements Needed for EffectiveHuman Capital Management 35Conclusions 44Recommendations 45Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 46AppendixesAppendix I: Scope and Methodology 49Appendix II: Structured Interview Form and Selected Results 51 Appendix III: Elements for Effective Human Capital Management 61 Appendix IV: Core Compensation Pay Bands and Grade Conversion for 2002 64Appendix V: FAA Human Resource Management Office’s Balanced Scorecard Performance Measures 66Appendix VI: GAO Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments 68GAO Contacts 68Staff Acknowledgments 68Tables Table 1: Overview of Human Resource Management Office’sBalanced Scorecard Performance Measures 39Table 2: Chronology of Internal and External Evaluations of FAA’s Personnel Reform 41Figures Figure 1: Implementation Status of Selected Initiatives within theThre e Areas of FAA’s Personnel Reform That Did or DidNot Require an Exemption from Title 5 4ContentsPage ii GAO-03-156 Human Capital ManagementFigure 2: Selected FAA Human Capital Reform Initiatives and TheirNeed for an Exemption from Title 5 10Figure 3: Career Level Pay Bands for Job Categories under Core Compensation 12Figure 4: Implementation Status of Selected FAA PersonnelReform Initiatives 18Figure 5: Compensation Systems Applicable to FAA’s Workforce 20Figure 6: Compensation of Air Traffic Controllers in Field Facilitiesand Regional and Headquarters Offices, 2002 26Figure 7: Number of FAA Employees Represented by Unions,1991-2001 28Figure 8: Inspector General’s Comments on the Effects ofPersonnel Reform on Hiring Times 29Figure 9: Funding Alternatives Used for Managers’ PCSPromotional Moves between Field Facilities, Fiscal Years1999-2001 31Figure 10: Number of Formal EEO Complaints by Year 34Figure 11: FAA Employees’ Views on the Model WorkEnvironment 35Figure 12: Volpe Center’s Views on Importance of Linkage 40Figure 13: Study’s Views on FAA’s Implementation of PersonnelReform 43Figure 14: Inspector General’s Views on FAA’s Implementation of Personnel Reform 43Figure 15: Consultant’s Views on FAA’s Implementation of Personnel Reform 44Figure 16: Eight Critical Success Factors Corresponding with theFour High-Risk Human Capital Challenges That Can HelpAgencies Manage Human Capital Strategically 62Figure 17: Six Key Practices for Effective Use of Human Capital Flexibilities 63ContentsPage iii GAO-03-156 Human Capital ManagementAbbreviationsCFR Code of Federal RegulationsEEO Equal Employment OpportunityFAA Federal Aviation AdministrationFAACMA FAA Conference Managers AssociationFLRA Federal Labor Relations AuthorityGFT Guaranteed Fair TreatmentGS General ScheduleNAPA National Academy of Public AdministrationNATCA National Air Traffic Controllers AssociationOMB Office of Management and BudgetOPM Office of Personnel ManagementPCS Permanent Change of StationThis is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. It may contain copyrighted graphics, images or other materials. Permission from the copyright holder may be necessary should you wish to reproduce copyrighted materials separately from GAO’s product.Page 1 GAO-03-156 Human Capital ManagementUnited States General Accounting OfficeWashington, D.C. 20548AFebruary 3, 2003The Honorable John L. MicaChairman, Subcommittee on AviationCommittee on Transportation andInfrastructureHouse of RepresentativesThe Honorable Thomas M. Davis IIIChairman, Committee on GovernmentReformHouse of RepresentativesThe Honorable David Weldon, M.D.House of RepresentativesThe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is managing its personnel under one of the most flexible human capital management environments in the federal government. This is a result of 1995 legislation that granted the agency broad exemptions from laws governing federal civilian personnel management found in title 5 of the United States Code. Congress provided these flexibilities in response to FAA’s position that the inflexibility of federal personnel systems was one of the most important constraints to the agency’s ability to be responsive to the airline industry’s needs and to increase productivity in air traffic control operations. In 1996, FAA announced a sweeping reform of its personnel management system. As we have reported,1 major change initiatives generally require a minimum of 5to 7 years to provide meaningful and lasting results, and so FAA’s implementation of personnel reform should now be approaching a point where such results might be discernable. As some other federal agencies, such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have requested similar human capital flexibilities, and others, such as the Transportation Security Administration, are now operating under similar exemptions from title 5 requi rements, FAA’s experiences in implementing its flexibilities could provide valuable information to Congress in considering whether to grant the use of such flexibilities at other agencies and in overseeing their use.1U.S. General Accounting Office, Managing for Results: Using Strategic Human Capital Management to Drive Transformational Change, GAO-02-940T (Washington, D.C.: July 15,2002).Page 2 GAO-03-156 Human Capital ManagementYou asked us to review the status of FAA’s personnel reform. As agreed, weanswered the following questions:• What changes did FAA initiate after being granted broad flexibilities in1995 and to what extent did these changes require exemptions fromtitle 5?• What is the status of the implementation of FAA’s human capital reforminitiatives, and what factors have affected the pace and extent ofimplementation?• What are the effects of FAA’s human capital reform initiatives accordingto data collected by FAA and the views of FAA human resource andlabor management officials, managers and employees, and unions?• To what extent has FAA’s reform effort incorporated elements that areimportant to effective human capital management in the federalgovernment?To answer these questions, we reviewed personnel managementrequirements in title 5 and the changes FAA made to its personnelmanagement system as a part of the agency’s reform effort. We collectedand analyzed internal and external evaluations of different aspects of FAA’spersonnel reform and the available data on the results of reform. Wediscussed reform with agency managers and human resource managementofficials and union representatives and conducted 176 structuredinterviews of randomly selected managers and employees in 27 fieldfacilities nationwide, 6 of FAA’s 9 regional offices, and FAA headquarters.Because of limitations inherent in the relatively small sample size, we didnot generalize the views and opinions of those randomly interviewed to allFAA employees. To augment the views and opinions collected from thestructured interviews, we obtained and analyzed the data available on theresults of the various initiatives provided by FAA’s Office of the Assistant Administrator for Human Resource Management and the lines of business2and obtained the views of FAA senior managers in the five lines of businessand representatives of employee associations. Finally, we considered FAA’sreform effort in light of elements of strategic human capital management2FAA is composed of five separate organizations or lines of business: Air Traffic Services,Research and Acquisitions, Regulation and Certification, Airports, and Commercial Space Transportation.Page 3 GAO-03-156 Human Capital Managementthat we developed in 2002 and assessments of human capital managementefforts and agencie s’ use of personnel flexibilities that wehave performed at other agencies.3 Appendix I contains a more detaileddescription of the scope and methodology of our work. A copy of ourstructured interview questions with selected employee responses isprovided in appendix II. We conducted our work from November 2001 toOctober 2002 in accordance with generally accepted government auditingstandards.Results in Brief In its human capital reform effort, FAA initiated changes in threebroadareas—compensation and performance management, workforcemanagement, and labor and employee relations—some of which required exemptions from title 5. In the area of compensation and performance management, FAA introduced two initiatives—a new, more flexible paysystem in which compensation levels are set within broad ranges, calledpay bands, and a new performance management system intended toimprove employees’ performance through more frequent feedback with nosummary rating. Both new systems required an exemption from title 5. Inthe area of workforce management, FAA undertook initiatives in workforceplanning (the process by which an organization plans and manages the size, capabilities, diversity, and deployment of its workforce), hiring, training,and relocation of employees. While the planning and training initiativesgenerally did not require exemptions from title 5, other workforcemanagement initiatives did require exemptions. In particular, exemptionfrom title 5 requirements allowed FAA to establish its own competitivehiring process and bypass centralized government hiring systemrequirements. Finally, initiatives in the area of labor and employee relationsincluded the establishment of new groups to represent unions andemployees and a new policy initiative to promote diversity and an openwork environment. Neither initiative required exemption from title 5,which continues to govern FAA’s labor relations.While FAA has fully implemented some or all initiatives in each of the threebroad areas of the reform effort it began in 1996, some key initiatives have3U.S. General Accounting Office, A Model of Strategic Human Capital Management, GAO-02-373SP (Washington, D.C., March 15, 2002); U.S. General Accounting Office, Human Capital: Effective Use of Flexibilities Can Assist Agencies in Managing Their Workforces, GAO-03-02 (Washington, D.C.: Dec. 6, 2002).Page 4 GAO-03-156 Human Capital Managementnot yet been fully implemented, and the pace and extent of implementationhave been affected by several factors. In the area of compensation andperformance management, FAA’s new compensation system has not yetbeen implemented for about one-quarter of the agency’s workforce whoseunions have not reached a new pay agreement with FAA. FAA’s newperformance management system had been implemented for about 20percent of the total workforce (15 percent nonunion employees and 5percent union employees) at the time of our review. In the area ofworkforce management, FAA implemented most initiatives in 1996 byallowing managers in the lines of business immediate use of newagencywide flexibilities for hiring and training employees. While FAAestablished similar agencywide policies for developing workforce plans forstaff, this initiative has not been fully implemented. In the area of labor and employee relations, FAA implemented initiatives establishing newpartnership forums for union and nonunion employees and a new modelwork environment program. While we did not determine all of the factorsthat may have affected the pace and extent of i mplementation, FAA’s needto implement initiatives among a workforce with a wide range of skills andworkplace environments and to negotiate changes with 48 bargaining unitswithin FAA’s nine unions were among factors that affected the pace andextent of reform implementation. Figure 1 shows selected initiatives ineach of the three areas of reform, along with whether they requiredexemptions from title 5 and their implementation status.Figure 1: Implementation Status of Selected Initiatives within the Thr ee Areas of FAA’s Personnel Reform That Did or Did NotRequire an Exemption from Title 5Page 5 GAO-03-156 Human Capital ManagementFAA had little data with which to assess the effects of its reform effort.While FAA human capital officials cited positive effects of FAA’s humancapital reform effort, the views of managers and employees and unionrepresentatives were generally less positive. In the area of compensationand performance management, FAA had not systematically collected oranalyzed data to suppo rt human resource management officials’ view thatcompensation changes had increased the agency’s ability to attract andretain employees. At the same time, many FAA managers and employeeswe interviewed were critical of the new compensation system. Nearly twothirds(110 out of 176) of those we interviewed disagreed or stronglydisagreed that the new pay system is fair to all employees. We were able tofind evidence of specific concerns regarding unfairness in disparities in payfor air traffic controllers. In addition, according to representatives ofFAA’s Office of Labor Relations and employee unions, a general sense ofunfairness over pay among some FAA employees outside of air trafficservices has led to increased unionization among FAA employees. Thenumber of employees in unions, as a percentage of the workforce,increased from 63 percent in 1995 to almost 80 percent in 2001. In the areaof workforce management, human resource management officials providedlimited data collected only for air marshals to support their view thatexternal hiring times had decreased from an average of 6 months to as littleas 6 weeks. In contrast, only 12 of the 46 managers we interviewed said thatthe speed of hiring has improved. Finally, FAA labor management officialscited a limited amount of data that indicated that the number of grievancesfiled at the national level by employees represented by unions hadincreased as evidence that new employee-union forums had not improvedlabor management relations. The managers and employees we interviewedhad mixed views on the impact of labor and employee relations reforminitiatives.FAA’s lack of empirical data on the effects of its human capital initiatives isone indication that it has not fully incorporated elements that we andothers have identified as important to effective human capital managementinto its reform effort. These elements include data collection and analysis, performance goals and measures, and linkage of reform goals to programgoals. Systems to gather and analyze relevant data provide a basis againstwhich performance goals and measures can be applied. FAA humanresource management officials said that the agency should have spentmore time to develop baseline data and performance measures beforeimplementing the broad range of reforms but that establishing theseelements was a complex and difficult task. They said FAA was undersignificant pressure to rapidly implement reforms and that one impact ofPage 6 GAO-03-156 Human Capital ManagementFAA’s incremental ap proach to implementing the reforms was that baselinemeasures tended to change as more people were brought under thereformed systems. FAA has also not gone far enough in establishing linkagebetween reform goals and overall program goals of the organization,another element we have identified as important to effective human capital management. We found that the lack of these elements has been pointedout repeatedly in evaluations of FAA’s human capital reform effort, but FAAhas not developed specific steps and time frames by which these elementswill be established and used for evaluation. Incorporation of theseelements could also help FAA build accountability into its human capitalmanagement approach.This report makes recommendations designed to enable FAA to develop amore strategic approach to its reform effort. By building these elementsinto its approach, FAA will be better able to evaluate the effects of itsreform initiatives, use the evaluations as a basis for any strategicimprovements to its human capital management approach, and holdagency leadership accountable for the results of its human capitalmanagement efforts. Doing so would also enable the agency to share itsresults with other federal agencies and Congress. In commenting on thedraft of this report, the Department of Transportation and FAA generallyagreed with the report’s recommendations. They emphasized thecomplexity of the reform effort and said they have been making significantprogress in developing needed elements for measuring the effectiveness ofthe new programs.Background The FAA’s mission is to provide a safe and efficient national aerospacesystem. FAA’s key aviation functions include regulating compliance withcivil aviation safety standards and air commerce, operating the national airtraffic management system, and assisting in the development of airports.The achievement of FAA’s mission is dependent in large part on the skillsand expertise of its workforce. FAA consists of nearly 50,000 people,organized into 5 lines of business and several staff offices. Its workforceprovides aviation services including air traffic control, maintenance of airtraffic control equipment, and certification of aircraft, airline operationsand pilots. FAA’s human resource management offi ce is responsible for managing agencywide implementation of personnel reform and providing policy and guidance to regional human resource management divisions that manage the implementation of personnel reform within their areas of responsibility.Page 7 GAO-03-156 Human Capital ManagementIn September 1993, the National Performance Review concluded that federal budget, procurement, and personnel rules prevented FAA from reacting quickly to the needs of the air traffic control system for new and more efficient equipment and flexibilities for attracting and hiring staff. In May 1994, building on these concerns, Congress directed the Secretary of Transportation to undertake a study of management, regulatory, and legislative reforms that would enable FAA to provide better air traffic control services without changing FAA’s basic organizational structure. The resulting FAA report to Congress, issued in August 1995,4 concluded that the most effective internal reform would be to exempt FAA from most federal personnel rules and procedures.5In reporting on FAA’s request for these exemptions in October 1995, we concluded that, if the Congress decided to provide FAA with new personnel authority, the agency could be used to test changes before they were applied governmentwide.6 At that time, we emphasized the importance of establishing goals prior to the application of the new authority, noting that an evaluation of FAA’s efforts after some experience had been obtained would be important for determining the success of the effort and its governmentwide applicability.On November 15, 1995, Congress, in making appropriations for the Department of Transportation, directed the FAA Administrator to develop and implement a new personnel management system.7 The law exempted FAA from most provisions of title 5 of the United States Code and other federal personnel laws.8 The law required that FAA’s new personnel management system address the unique demands of the agency’s4Federal Aviation Administration, Background Paper: Personnel Management Reform for the Federal Aviation Administration (Washington, D.C.: August 1995).5Unless explicitly exempted by law, all federal agencies must follow federal personnel rules and regulations under title 5 U.S.C., including rules governing how agencies (1) pay andreward employees; (2) hire, train, and transfer personnel; and (3) conduct labor and employee affairs.6U.S. General Accounting Office, Exempting FAA From Procurement and Personnel Rules, GAO/RCED-96-27R (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 27, 1995).7P. L. 104-50, Fiscal Year 1996 Department of Transportation Appropriations Act.8Congress did not exempt FAA from provisions of title 5 pertaining to veterans’ preference; antidiscrimination; federal retirement, unemployment and insurance coverage; andlimitations on the right to strike.Page 8 GAO-03-156 Human Capital Managementworkforce, and, at a minimum, provide greater flexibility in the compensation, hiring, training and location of personnel. Subsequent legislation9 reinstated title 5 requirements related to labor-management relations, and the Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996 placed additional requirements on FAA by requiring that any changes made to FAA’s personnel management system be negotiated with the agency’s unions. Accordingly, compensation levels became subject to negotiations with employee unions. On April 1, 1996, FAA introduced its new personnel management system.In January 2001, we designated strategic human capital management as a governmentwide high-risk area.10 As our January 2001 High-Risk Series and Performance and Accountability Series reports make clear, serious human capital shortfalls are eroding the ability of many agencies, and threatening the ability of others, to economically, efficiently, and effectively perform their missions.11 In 2002, our studies of human capital management in the federal government identified a variety of elements—critical success factors and practices for effective implementation of flexibilities—that are important for consideration of federal human capital management efforts. For example, systems to gather and analyze data, performance goals and measures, linkage between human capital management goals and program goals of the organization, and accountability are among the elements that we have identified as essential for effective strategic human capital management. Appendix III provides an overview of our March 2002 model for strategic human capital management12 and key practices for federal agencies’ effective use of human capital flexibi lities we identified in December 2002.13Many of these elements relate directly to weaknesses we have identified in our recent reviews of FAA. For example, in July 2001, we reported that a9P. L. 104-122, Further Continuing Appropriations, Fiscal Year 1996, March 29, 1996.10U.S. General Accounting Office, High-Risk Series: An Update, GAO-01-263 (Washington, D.C.: January 2001).11U.S. General Accounting Office, Performance and Accountability Series—Major Management Challenges and Program Risks: A Governmentwide Perspective, GAO-01-241(Washington, D.C.: January 2001).12GAO-02-373SP.13GAO-03-02.Page 9 GAO-03-156 Human Capital Managementlack of performance measurement, evaluation, and rewards hindered the effectiveness of rulemaking reforms.14 In October 2001, we reported that the overall effectiveness of FAA’s training for air traffic controllers was uncertain and that FAA had not measured productivity gains from changes in controllers’ duties.15 We reported in June 2002 on FAA’s difficulties in acquiring and developing staff to meet agency needs through air traffic control workforce planning.16 Most recently, we reported in October 2002。

关于人力资源管理的外文文献1. Human Resource Management Practices and Workforce Diversity: A ReviewThis article explores the relationship between human resource management (HRM) practices and workforce diversity. The authors review literature on HRM practices such as recruitment, selection, training and development, performance measurement, work design, and employee relations, to examine how these practices influence the success of workforce diversity. The article highlights the need for organizations to adopt effective HRM practices that support diversity and inclusion, in order to maximize the benefits of a diverse workforce.2. The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management on Organizational PerformanceThis study analyzes the relationship between strategic human resource management (SHRM) practices and organizational performance. The authors examine the impact of SHRM practices such as recruitment and selection, training and development, performance management, and compensation and benefits, on key organizational outcomes such as employee retention, productivity, and profitability. The study concludesthat effective SHRM practices are positively associated with organizational performance, and that organizations need to prioritize HRM strategies that support their overall business objectives.3. Managing Human Resources in the Globalizing Economy: Challenges and OpportunitiesThis article explores the challenges and opportunities presented by the globalizing economy for human resource management. The authors examine how globalization has impacted HRM practices in areas such as recruitment and selection, training and development, compensation and benefits, and employee relations. The article also highlights the importance of cultural sensitivity in managing a diverse global workforce, and the need for HR professionals to adapt to changing business environments to effectively manage human resources.4. The Role of Human Resource Management in Corporate Social ResponsibilityThis study examines the role of HRM in promoting corporate social responsibility (CSR). The authors analyze the connection between CSR and HRM practices such as recruitment, selection, training anddevelopment, and employee relations, to determine how these practices can support and enhance CSR initiatives. The article emphasizes the need for HR professionals to align their practices with CSR goals in order to promote sustainable business practices and social responsibility.5. Employee Engagement and Retention: A Review of the LiteratureThis article reviews literature on the relationship between employee engagement and retention. The authors examine the factors that contribute to employee engagement, such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and leadership, and how these factors can impact employee retention. The article also highlights the importance of effective HRM practices in enhancing employee engagement and retention, and provides recommendations for organizations seeking to improve their retention rates through engagement-focused HRM strategies.。

文献信息：文献标题：Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of human resource management（影响人力资源管理未来的挑战和机遇）国外作者：Dianna L. Stone，Diana L. Deadrick文献出处：《Human Resource Management Review》, 2015, 25(2):139-145 字数统计：英文3725单词，21193字符；中文6933汉字外文文献：Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of humanresource managementAbstract Today, the field of Human Resource Management (HR) is experiencing numerous pressures for change. Shifts in the economy, globalization, domestic diversity, and technology have created new demands for organizations, and propelled the field in some completely new directions. However, we believe that these challenges also create numerous opportunities for HR and organizations as a whole. Thus, the primary purposes of this article are to examine some of the challenges and opportunities that should influence the future of HR. We also consider implications for future research and practice in the field.Keywords: Future of human resource management, Globalization, Knowledge economy Diversity, Technology1.Change from a manufacturing to a service or knowledge economyOne of the major challenges influencing the future of HR processes is the change from a manufacturing to a service or knowledgebased economy. This new economy is characterized by a decline in manufacturing and a growth in service or knowledge as the core of the economic base. A service economy can be defined as a system based on buying and selling of services or providing something for others (OxfordDictionary, 2014a). A knowledge economy is referred to as the use of information or knowledge to generate tangible and intangible value (Business Dictionary, 2014a). Some economists argue that service activities are now dominating the economies of industrialized nations, and knowledge-intensive services or businesses are considered a subset of the overall service economy (Anderson & Corley, 2003).The rise of the knowledge economy has placed new demands on organizations and prompted changes in organizational goals and HR practices. Many of the traditional HR processes were designed during the industrial era, and thus focused largely on manufacturing organizations that were concerned with converting raw materials, components, and parts into finished goods that meet customers' expectations. However, many of the assumptions underlying those traditional HR processes may not be effective with the new service or knowledge organizations. For example, traditional HR practices assume that jobs should be narrowly defined, supervisors should control workers, and efficiency and short term results should be emphasized (Trice & Beyer, 1993). In contrast, knowledge organizations stress that employees' knowledge and skills have a major impact on organizational success, and employee retention is important because individuals' skills are not substitutable.Knowledge organizations also tend to design jobs broadly so as to encourage innovation, autonomy, continuous improvement, and participation in decision making. Given that individuals with unique skills and abilities are essential in knowledge organizations, the new job requirements have created a shortage and increased competition for talented workers in many fields (e.g., software engineering, nursing). Additionally, the change in the economy has resulted in the displacement and unemployment of people who do not have the skills needed for knowledge-oriented jobs (e.g., Bell, Berry, Marquardt, & Green, 2013; Karren & Sherman, 2012). These changes imply that nations need to alter their educational systems to meet job demands in new organizations (Gowan, 2012). The goals of knowledge organizations should continue to bring about changes in HR processes in the future (e.g., Schuler, Jackson, Jackofsky, & Slocum, 1996). For instance, it can be expected that HR practices will employ broad based recruiting to ensure that they uncover skilledapplicants, design jobs to emphasize autonomy and participation in decision-making, use team oriented structures to enhance collaboration and innovation, stress training and employee skill development, and provide incentives that foster employee identification, innovation, and retention. HR will need to shift its emphasis to employee retention, and meeting the varied needs of knowledge workers. Some of these new practices have already been implemented in organizations, but many organizations still use HR practices that do not support knowledge-oriented organizational goals. Future HR processes will need to be modified if knowledge organizations are to be successful. Research will also be needed to examine the effectiveness of these new practices.Although we considered the new knowledge economy as a challenge for HR in organizations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for change. Given that the skills and abilities of knowledge workers are key to the success of new organizations, the transformation to a knowledge economy provides opportunities for the HR function to become a priority in organizations. As a result, we believe that HR will become more of a critical function in organizations, and the field should be viewed as more essential to the overall success of the organizations.2.Rise in globalizationA second factor calling for changes in HR processes is the rise in globalization. Globalization in this context refers to organizations that operate on a global or international scale (Oxford Dictionary, 2014b). Organizations operating in a global environment face a number of new challenges including differences in language and culture of employees, and variations in social, political and legal systems. Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large companies operating in several countries that are confronted with new questions, including how to create consistent HR practices in different locations, how to develop a coherent corporate culture, and how to prepare managers to work in a diverse cultural environment (Sparrow, 2007).Research on HR in the international context has focused on three approaches to understanding the issues that arise in global environments: international, comparative,and cross-cultural HR (Parry, Stavrou-Costea, & Morley, 2011). International approaches focus on HR strategies, systems, and practices in different socio-cultural contexts and different geographic territories (Parry et al., 2011). It also outlines the anatomy of MNCs, and considers the unique set of HR issues that occur in these contexts (Budhwar & Sparrow, 2002). Although researchers differ on the factors that affect HR practices in global environments, most agree that the following variables influence these systems: (a) contextual variables (such as the host country's legal system, cultural distance between host country and employees' country), (b) firm-specific variables (such as the stage of internationalization, type of industry, link between strategy and structure), and (c) situational variables (such as staff availability, need for control, locus of decision making) (e.g., Budhwar & Sparrow, 2002; Schuler, Dowling, & De Cieri, 1993; Welch,1994).Comparative HR explores the context, systems, and national patterns of HR in different countries, and discusses the idiosyncrasies of various institutions and economic environments (e.g., Aycan et al., 2000; Isenhour, Stone, & Lien, 2012a; Parry et al., 2011). Most of the research on comparative HR indicated that HR practices differ across nations, and are aligned with national cultures (Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). Two examples of that research include a study by Schuler and Rogovsky (1998) that assessed the relations between Hofstede's national culture dimensions and the design of HR practices. These authors found that a national emphasis on individualism was positively correlated with a company's use of pay-for-performance pay systems. In addition, Gooderham, Nordhaug, and Ringdal (1999) explored cross-national differences in HR practices across European nations. Their results revealed that individualistic nations (e.g., UK, France, and Spain) were more likely to use calculative HR strategies (e.g., pay for performance) than collective nations (e.g., Scandinavian countries). Conversely, collective nations (Scandinavian countries) were more likely to use collaborative practices (e.g., employee participation) than individualistic countries (e.g., Germany, France and Spain).Finally, cross-cultural HR examines the degree to which individuals' cultural values influence the acceptance and effectiveness of HR practices (Aycan et al., 2000;Gelfand, Erez, & Aycan, 2007; Isenhour, Stone, & Lien, 2012b; Stone, Stone-Romero, & Lukaszewski, 2007). Most of the theories in HR and Organizational Behavior (OB) were developed in Western nations and assume that the cultural values of individuals in organizations are homogeneous (Gelfand et al., 2007). However, it is clear that employees' cultural values differ in U.S. and global contexts, and organizations need to align their HR processes with these cultural values (e.g., Gelfand et al., 2007; Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). For example, cross-cultural research indicated that individuals' cultural values shape their reward preferences, and their reactions to negative feedback (e.g., Gelfand et al., 2007; Joshi & Martocchio, 2008; Stone, Johnson, Stone-Romero, & Hartman, 2006; Stone-Romero & Stone, 2002). In particular, individuals who valued individualism preferred reward allocation systems based on equity or proportionality, but those who valued collectivism preferred equality-based allocation systems (Sama & Papamarcos, 2000). As a result, pay-for-performance systems may motivate employees who are individualistic, but group-based or profit-sharing systems may be more effective with those who value collectivism (e.g., Joshi & Martocchio, 2008; Miller, Hom, & Gomez-Mejia, 2001). Furthermore, research by Stone-Romero and Stone (2002) revealed that individuals who endorse collectivism were more likely to accept negative feedback than those who stress individualism.Given that most organizations are operating in a global environment, we expect that the field will pay even more attention to these issues in the future. One reason is that the employment rates of U.S.-based MNCs have grown consistently over the past decades, and they now employ over 34.5 million workers in multiple countries (Bureau of Economic, 2013). It is anticipated that the numbers of MNCs will continue to expand over time, and HR practices will need to be congruent with these new multicultural and complex contexts. As a result, we expect that future research in HR will focus on the effectiveness and acceptance of HR practices in global environments.Even though we have considered globalization as a challenge for organizations, we believe that it also provides many new opportunities. For instance, globalizationshould expand markets for products and services, and may enhance creativity and innovation because organizations will become more culturally diverse. Research showed consistently that diversity increases innovation and creativity, and this should also apply to the field of HR (van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004). In particular, HR in global contexts will have to use creative solutions for attracting, motivating, and retaining diverse employees. For example, they may have to use unique rewards systems (e.g., cafeteria or flexible reward systems) to ensure that they meet the needs of workers from different cultural backgrounds (e.g., Stone, Deadrick, Lukaszewski, & Johnson, 2015). Of course, research will be needed to examine the effectiveness of these new approaches.3.Growing domestic diversityApart from changes in the economy and globalization, organizations are also faced with major shifts in the composition of the U. S. population. In particular, it is expected that our population will be older and more ethnically diverse by 2060 (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2014). For instance, by 2060 one in five Americans will be 65 years of age or older, and the number of working age people in the population (ages 18 to 64) will decrease from 62.7% to 56.9%. Along with the age-related changes, the work values of younger generations are expected to be different than previous groups (e.g., Baby Boomers). As a result, organizations will need to develop HR practices that are aligned with the primary goals and the values of multiple generations of employees (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge, Campbell, Hoffman, & Lance, 2010).3.1.Increased age and generational diversityAlong with the aging workforce come many new challenges for HR. For instance, given the shortage of skilled workers there is a growing concern about the retention of skilled baby boomers. One reason for this is that baby boomers often have unique skills and abilities that are critical to organizational success, and companies are justifiably worried about retaining them in their roles until qualified replacements can be found or trained. In order to retain these individuals, organizations will need toincrease flexible work arrangements, allow part-time work, provide a supportive environment, and employ recognition systems to motivate them to stay with the organization (Armstrong-Stassen, Schlosser, & Zinni, 2012; Cheung & Wu, 2013; Shacklock & Brunetto, 2011).Another challenge facing organizations is that they will be staffed by members of multiple generations, and members of generations differ in terms of work values, attitudes, and behaviors (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge et al., 2010). As a result, organizations will have to modify their HR practices in order to attract and retain skilled members of all of these groups. For example, recent research indicated that baby boomers (born 1946 to 1964) placed a strong emphasis on hard work and achievement, valued intrinsic rewards, and stressed loyalty to the organization (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge et al., 2010). In contrast, members of generation X (born 1965–1981) were more likely to value extrinsic rewards, leisure time, steady employment, work family balance, and promotion opportunities than baby boomers (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge et al., 2010). Research also indicated that the values of generation Y were somewhat similar to those of generation X (born 1982–1999; i.e., they valued leisure time, work–family balance, extrinsic rewards, status), but they were more likely to emphasize freedom than either generation X or baby boomers. In addition, members of generation Y stressed extrinsic rewards less than generation X, but both generations X and Y reported greater intentions to leave organizations than baby boomers (Twenge et al., 2010).Given these differences in values, organizations are faced with the complex challenge of aligning reward and compensation systems with the values of multiple generations. For example, they may need to expand beyond merely static pay and benefits and incorporate more flexible reward systems. In particular, they might identify the reward preferences of individuals, and develop cafeteria reward systems that provide employees with a total sum for their overall compensation, thus allowing them to select different rewards and benefits (e.g., one person might select vacation time in lieu of pay, whereas others might select pay instead of time off from work; Stone‐Romero, Stone, & Salas, 2003).3.2.Expanded ethnic diversityThere will also be dramatic change in the racial and ethnic make-up of our society. Today, ethnic minorities make up about 37% of the population, but estimates indicate they will comprise 57% of the nation by 2060 (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2014). It has also been projected that the U.S. will become a majority–minority nation by 2043, and the numbers of Hispanic–Americans (Hispanic) will more than double in the coming years (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2014). By 2060, one in three people in the U.S. will be Hispanic.Even though there has been relatively little HR research on the cultural values of ethnic minorities in the U. S., some studies found that, on average, they have different values than Anglo-Americans (Bell, Marquardt, & Berry, 2014; Guerrero & Posthuma, 2014; Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). For example, Hispanics, African–Americans, Asian–Americans, and Native Americans are, on average, more likely to endorse collective values than Anglo-Americans (Guerrero & Posthuma, 2014; Stone et al., 2006; Triandis, 1994). In contrast, Anglo-Americans are, on average, more likely to stress individualism than their counterparts, but it should be cautioned that there are within group differences in cultural values for all of these sub-groups (Betancourt & Lopez, 1993).Given the transformation in the composition of the U.S. population, current HR practices may be less effective with employees from diverse backgrounds than those from the dominant group. The primary reason for this is that traditional HR processes were designed for a homogeneous set of employees with individualistic cultural values, and the new workforce is likely to have value systems based on collectivism and familism (e.g., Gelfand et al., 2007; Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). Thus, organizations will have to have their HR practices modified so that they are aligned with the values of new generations, and the cultural values of diverse employees. As noted above, members of different ethnic subgroups often have distinctive reward preferences, and unique work values, and should react differently than Anglo-Americans to traditional HR processes.Thus, in order to attract and retain subgroup members, organizations may have toalter their current reward and benefit systems to meet the needs of these employees. For example, many ethnic subgroup members are more familistic and collective than AngloAmericans (Phinney, 1996), so they may prefer that organizations offer opportunities for teamwork, work–family balance, time off from work, and group based reward systems. As a result, organizations that develop cafeteria compensation and benefits systems that provide flexibility in terms of reward and benefit allocations may be more attractive to the new workforce than traditional reward systems. For instance, those employees who value familism can choose an extra week of vacation time to spend with their families in lieu of pay or other benefits. Organizations will be able to use these flexible compensation plans to attract talented applicants from all ethnic groups.In view of the coming changes in generational and domestic diversity, organizations are likely to modify their future HR practices to meet the needs of employees with diverse values. To date, most of the research on domestic diversity has focused on unfair discrimination and relational demography (e.g., Stone‐Romero et al., 2003; van Knippenberg et al., 2004). We believe that future HR research will need to be expanded and dig deeper into the value differences, reward preferences, and unique work roles of the new diverse workforce.In our discussion above, we viewed changes in generational and ethnic diversity as a challenge for organizations. However, they can also be considered opportunities for organizations to utilize the many talents and skills that these individuals bring to the workforce, and should provide a wide array of individuals with the chance to display their skills and talents. Furthermore, the altered composition of the workforce should help organizations reach broader markets for their products and services, and increase the innovation and creativity in organizations (van Knippenberg et al., 2004). They should also prompt organizations to develop new HR practices that will meet the needs of all members of the workforce (e.g., cafeteria reward systems) (Stone et al., 2006).4.Emerging use of technologyOver the past 30 years, one of the major drivers of change in HR has been the increased use of information technology (hereinafter referred to as technology) to collect, store, and utilize data for decision-making (e.g., Gueutal & Stone, 2005; Strohmeier, 2007; Strohmeier & Kabst, 2009). Technology, especially, the World Wide Web, has transformed key HR processes in organizations (e.g., e-recruiting, e-selection, e-training), and modified the nature of jobs and the relationships between individuals and organizations (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1984). For example, it has enabled organizations to use the Internet to advertise jobs, and made it possible for applicants to apply for jobs online (e.g., Dineen & Allen, 2013). In addition, organizations are using various forms of technology to deliver training to employees (e.g., the Internet, intranet systems, video conferencing, online simulations; Salas, DeRouin, & Littrell, 2005). Research on the use of technology to facilitate HR processes indicated that it typically enhances efficiency, and decreases costs associated with HR transactions (e.g., Dulebohn & Johnson, 2013; Dulebohn & Marler, 2005; Strohmeier, 2007). However, some researchers argued that there is no clear evidence that it helps HR meets its primary goals of attracting, motivating, and retaining talented employees (see Stone et al., 2015, for a detailed discussion of influence of technology and the future of HR).Despite the increased efficiency and cost savings associated with the use of technology in the field of HR, researchers maintained that there are a number of limitations associated with using current technologies to manage HR processes (e.g., Stone et al., 2015;Stone‐Romero et al., 2003). For instance, information technologies are often static and use one-way communication systems that do not allow applicants or employees to ask questions or gain advice from HR professionals (e.g., benefits). As a result, the technologies can be impersonal, inflexible, and create an artificial distance between supervisors and employees. Likewise, the use of technology for training may be less engaging than traditional methods, and may not give trainees the opportunity to practice or gain feedback. Furthermore, technology may actually transfer the work of HR departments to line managers or employees, which may reduce overall productivity in organizations (Stone‐Romero et al., 2003).In spite of possible limitations associated with using technology to manage HR processes, it will continue to transform the field in the future. Furthermore, it can be argued that new technologies will emerge that should decrease some of the major drawbacks associated with current systems. For instance, a number of researchers argued that the use of new interactive technologies (e.g., Web 2.0, social media, virtual simulations or job fairs, chat rooms, cloud computing, mobile devices) should decrease some of the weaknesses associated with current systems (see Dineen & Allen, 2013; Stone et al., 2015; Sullivan, 2014). For example, the use of social media, chat rooms, and high definition cloud computing should enable applicants and employees to engage in an interactive dialogue with recruiters or managers. Similarly, the use of virtual reality should provide applicants with opportunities to attend virtual job fairs, give supervisors the ability to mentor subordinates, and offer trainees the chance to participate in virtual training simulations. All of these virtual environments should increase the degree to which technology-based HR processes are personal, flexible, interactive, engaging, and decrease the interpersonal distance between employees and supervisors. Although these arguments seem plausible, research will be needed to examine the effectiveness and acceptance of these new HR processes.Despite the fact that we viewed technology as a challenge in the sections above, it should be noted that it also provides new opportunities for the field of HR. For instance, research showed that technology often decreases the administrative burden in HR, increases efficiency, and allows the field to contribute to the strategic direction of organizations (Stone & Dulebohn, 2013). To date, there is no evidence that it helps organizations achieve its primary goals, but we believe that new interactive technologies will facilitate the attraction and retention of critical employees (Stone et al., 2015). One reason for this is that it will allow supervisors and HR professionals to engage in more frequent interaction and communication with employees. As a result, they will be able to identify and meet the needs of critical employees, and ensure that they remain with the organizations. It may also enable organizations to make better HR decisions based on objective information or decision support systems (Dulebohn & Johnson, 2013). Furthermore, it may facilitate interactions with stakeholders insideand outside the organization. For example, supervisors may be able to communicate with external customers in order to improve employees' performance, and HR professionals should be capable of staying abreast of innovative practices used by other organizations (see Ulrich & Dulebohn, 2015, for a detailed discussion of these issues).中文译文：影响人力资源管理未来的挑战和机遇摘要如今，人力资源（HR）管理领域正面临着巨大的变革压力。

Human resource management more and more drives value. Under the system that economy development mature, human resource management have to match with fight for the best resources performance, if out of character of the manpower form couples out of character of post, the resources performance be not only whole have no, or may have already exhaust. The modern economy stress balance and match, promote management effect and quality vegetable, will human resource match with make balance, the inside contents establish human resource structure frame, use most in keeping with of the person do most in keeping with of work. Establishment human resource terrace is a communication and collection information way, everyone's opinion comprehensive, give up short take long, with processing salary, welfare etc. affair. Human resource most the importance be a training and development, human resource development have to investment at training aspect, with exertive each stratum of human resource potential.人力资源管理愈来愈被重视。

文献信息：文献标题：Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of human resource management（影响人力资源管理未来的挑战和机遇）国外作者：Dianna L. Stone，Diana L. Deadrick文献出处：《Human Resource Management Review》, 2015, 25(2):139-145 字数统计：英文3725单词，21193字符；中文6933汉字外文文献：Challenges and opportunities affecting the future of humanresource managementAbstract Today, the field of Human Resource Management (HR) is experiencing numerous pressures for change. Shifts in the economy, globalization, domestic diversity, and technology have created new demands for organizations, and propelled the field in some completely new directions. However, we believe that these challenges also create numerous opportunities for HR and organizations as a whole. Thus, the primary purposes of this article are to examine some of the challenges and opportunities that should influence the future of HR. We also consider implications for future research and practice in the field.Keywords: Future of human resource management, Globalization, Knowledge economy Diversity, Technology1.Change from a manufacturing to a service or knowledge economyOne of the major challenges influencing the future of HR processes is the change from a manufacturing to a service or knowledgebased economy. This new economy is characterized by a decline in manufacturing and a growth in service or knowledge as the core of the economic base. A service economy can be defined as a system based on buying and selling of services or providing something for others (OxfordDictionary, 2014a). A knowledge economy is referred to as the use of information or knowledge to generate tangible and intangible value (Business Dictionary, 2014a). Some economists argue that service activities are now dominating the economies of industrialized nations, and knowledge-intensive services or businesses are considered a subset of the overall service economy (Anderson & Corley, 2003).The rise of the knowledge economy has placed new demands on organizations and prompted changes in organizational goals and HR practices. Many of the traditional HR processes were designed during the industrial era, and thus focused largely on manufacturing organizations that were concerned with converting raw materials, components, and parts into finished goods that meet customers' expectations. However, many of the assumptions underlying those traditional HR processes may not be effective with the new service or knowledge organizations. For example, traditional HR practices assume that jobs should be narrowly defined, supervisors should control workers, and efficiency and short term results should be emphasized (Trice & Beyer, 1993). In contrast, knowledge organizations stress that employees' knowledge and skills have a major impact on organizational success, and employee retention is important because individuals' skills are not substitutable.Knowledge organizations also tend to design jobs broadly so as to encourage innovation, autonomy, continuous improvement, and participation in decision making. Given that individuals with unique skills and abilities are essential in knowledge organizations, the new job requirements have created a shortage and increased competition for talented workers in many fields (e.g., software engineering, nursing). Additionally, the change in the economy has resulted in the displacement and unemployment of people who do not have the skills needed for knowledge-oriented jobs (e.g., Bell, Berry, Marquardt, & Green, 2013; Karren & Sherman, 2012). These changes imply that nations need to alter their educational systems to meet job demands in new organizations (Gowan, 2012). The goals of knowledge organizations should continue to bring about changes in HR processes in the future (e.g., Schuler, Jackson, Jackofsky, & Slocum, 1996). For instance, it can be expected that HR practices will employ broad based recruiting to ensure that they uncover skilledapplicants, design jobs to emphasize autonomy and participation in decision-making, use team oriented structures to enhance collaboration and innovation, stress training and employee skill development, and provide incentives that foster employee identification, innovation, and retention. HR will need to shift its emphasis to employee retention, and meeting the varied needs of knowledge workers. Some of these new practices have already been implemented in organizations, but many organizations still use HR practices that do not support knowledge-oriented organizational goals. Future HR processes will need to be modified if knowledge organizations are to be successful. Research will also be needed to examine the effectiveness of these new practices.Although we considered the new knowledge economy as a challenge for HR in organizations, it can also be viewed as an opportunity for change. Given that the skills and abilities of knowledge workers are key to the success of new organizations, the transformation to a knowledge economy provides opportunities for the HR function to become a priority in organizations. As a result, we believe that HR will become more of a critical function in organizations, and the field should be viewed as more essential to the overall success of the organizations.2.Rise in globalizationA second factor calling for changes in HR processes is the rise in globalization. Globalization in this context refers to organizations that operate on a global or international scale (Oxford Dictionary, 2014b). Organizations operating in a global environment face a number of new challenges including differences in language and culture of employees, and variations in social, political and legal systems. Multinational corporations (MNCs) are large companies operating in several countries that are confronted with new questions, including how to create consistent HR practices in different locations, how to develop a coherent corporate culture, and how to prepare managers to work in a diverse cultural environment (Sparrow, 2007).Research on HR in the international context has focused on three approaches to understanding the issues that arise in global environments: international, comparative,and cross-cultural HR (Parry, Stavrou-Costea, & Morley, 2011). International approaches focus on HR strategies, systems, and practices in different socio-cultural contexts and different geographic territories (Parry et al., 2011). It also outlines the anatomy of MNCs, and considers the unique set of HR issues that occur in these contexts (Budhwar & Sparrow, 2002). Although researchers differ on the factors that affect HR practices in global environments, most agree that the following variables influence these systems: (a) contextual variables (such as the host country's legal system, cultural distance between host country and employees' country), (b) firm-specific variables (such as the stage of internationalization, type of industry, link between strategy and structure), and (c) situational variables (such as staff availability, need for control, locus of decision making) (e.g., Budhwar & Sparrow, 2002; Schuler, Dowling, & De Cieri, 1993; Welch,1994).Comparative HR explores the context, systems, and national patterns of HR in different countries, and discusses the idiosyncrasies of various institutions and economic environments (e.g., Aycan et al., 2000; Isenhour, Stone, & Lien, 2012a; Parry et al., 2011). Most of the research on comparative HR indicated that HR practices differ across nations, and are aligned with national cultures (Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). Two examples of that research include a study by Schuler and Rogovsky (1998) that assessed the relations between Hofstede's national culture dimensions and the design of HR practices. These authors found that a national emphasis on individualism was positively correlated with a company's use of pay-for-performance pay systems. In addition, Gooderham, Nordhaug, and Ringdal (1999) explored cross-national differences in HR practices across European nations. Their results revealed that individualistic nations (e.g., UK, France, and Spain) were more likely to use calculative HR strategies (e.g., pay for performance) than collective nations (e.g., Scandinavian countries). Conversely, collective nations (Scandinavian countries) were more likely to use collaborative practices (e.g., employee participation) than individualistic countries (e.g., Germany, France and Spain).Finally, cross-cultural HR examines the degree to which individuals' cultural values influence the acceptance and effectiveness of HR practices (Aycan et al., 2000;Gelfand, Erez, & Aycan, 2007; Isenhour, Stone, & Lien, 2012b; Stone, Stone-Romero, & Lukaszewski, 2007). Most of the theories in HR and Organizational Behavior (OB) were developed in Western nations and assume that the cultural values of individuals in organizations are homogeneous (Gelfand et al., 2007). However, it is clear that employees' cultural values differ in U.S. and global contexts, and organizations need to align their HR processes with these cultural values (e.g., Gelfand et al., 2007; Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). For example, cross-cultural research indicated that individuals' cultural values shape their reward preferences, and their reactions to negative feedback (e.g., Gelfand et al., 2007; Joshi & Martocchio, 2008; Stone, Johnson, Stone-Romero, & Hartman, 2006; Stone-Romero & Stone, 2002). In particular, individuals who valued individualism preferred reward allocation systems based on equity or proportionality, but those who valued collectivism preferred equality-based allocation systems (Sama & Papamarcos, 2000). As a result, pay-for-performance systems may motivate employees who are individualistic, but group-based or profit-sharing systems may be more effective with those who value collectivism (e.g., Joshi & Martocchio, 2008; Miller, Hom, & Gomez-Mejia, 2001). Furthermore, research by Stone-Romero and Stone (2002) revealed that individuals who endorse collectivism were more likely to accept negative feedback than those who stress individualism.Given that most organizations are operating in a global environment, we expect that the field will pay even more attention to these issues in the future. One reason is that the employment rates of U.S.-based MNCs have grown consistently over the past decades, and they now employ over 34.5 million workers in multiple countries (Bureau of Economic, 2013). It is anticipated that the numbers of MNCs will continue to expand over time, and HR practices will need to be congruent with these new multicultural and complex contexts. As a result, we expect that future research in HR will focus on the effectiveness and acceptance of HR practices in global environments.Even though we have considered globalization as a challenge for organizations, we believe that it also provides many new opportunities. For instance, globalizationshould expand markets for products and services, and may enhance creativity and innovation because organizations will become more culturally diverse. Research showed consistently that diversity increases innovation and creativity, and this should also apply to the field of HR (van Knippenberg, De Dreu, & Homan, 2004). In particular, HR in global contexts will have to use creative solutions for attracting, motivating, and retaining diverse employees. For example, they may have to use unique rewards systems (e.g., cafeteria or flexible reward systems) to ensure that they meet the needs of workers from different cultural backgrounds (e.g., Stone, Deadrick, Lukaszewski, & Johnson, 2015). Of course, research will be needed to examine the effectiveness of these new approaches.3.Growing domestic diversityApart from changes in the economy and globalization, organizations are also faced with major shifts in the composition of the U. S. population. In particular, it is expected that our population will be older and more ethnically diverse by 2060 (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2014). For instance, by 2060 one in five Americans will be 65 years of age or older, and the number of working age people in the population (ages 18 to 64) will decrease from 62.7% to 56.9%. Along with the age-related changes, the work values of younger generations are expected to be different than previous groups (e.g., Baby Boomers). As a result, organizations will need to develop HR practices that are aligned with the primary goals and the values of multiple generations of employees (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge, Campbell, Hoffman, & Lance, 2010).3.1.Increased age and generational diversityAlong with the aging workforce come many new challenges for HR. For instance, given the shortage of skilled workers there is a growing concern about the retention of skilled baby boomers. One reason for this is that baby boomers often have unique skills and abilities that are critical to organizational success, and companies are justifiably worried about retaining them in their roles until qualified replacements can be found or trained. In order to retain these individuals, organizations will need toincrease flexible work arrangements, allow part-time work, provide a supportive environment, and employ recognition systems to motivate them to stay with the organization (Armstrong-Stassen, Schlosser, & Zinni, 2012; Cheung & Wu, 2013; Shacklock & Brunetto, 2011).Another challenge facing organizations is that they will be staffed by members of multiple generations, and members of generations differ in terms of work values, attitudes, and behaviors (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge et al., 2010). As a result, organizations will have to modify their HR practices in order to attract and retain skilled members of all of these groups. For example, recent research indicated that baby boomers (born 1946 to 1964) placed a strong emphasis on hard work and achievement, valued intrinsic rewards, and stressed loyalty to the organization (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge et al., 2010). In contrast, members of generation X (born 1965–1981) were more likely to value extrinsic rewards, leisure time, steady employment, work family balance, and promotion opportunities than baby boomers (Cennamo & Gardner, 2008; Twenge et al., 2010). Research also indicated that the values of generation Y were somewhat similar to those of generation X (born 1982–1999; i.e., they valued leisure time, work–family balance, extrinsic rewards, status), but they were more likely to emphasize freedom than either generation X or baby boomers. In addition, members of generation Y stressed extrinsic rewards less than generation X, but both generations X and Y reported greater intentions to leave organizations than baby boomers (Twenge et al., 2010).Given these differences in values, organizations are faced with the complex challenge of aligning reward and compensation systems with the values of multiple generations. For example, they may need to expand beyond merely static pay and benefits and incorporate more flexible reward systems. In particular, they might identify the reward preferences of individuals, and develop cafeteria reward systems that provide employees with a total sum for their overall compensation, thus allowing them to select different rewards and benefits (e.g., one person might select vacation time in lieu of pay, whereas others might select pay instead of time off from work; Stone‐Romero, Stone, & Salas, 2003).3.2.Expanded ethnic diversityThere will also be dramatic change in the racial and ethnic make-up of our society. Today, ethnic minorities make up about 37% of the population, but estimates indicate they will comprise 57% of the nation by 2060 (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2014). It has also been projected that the U.S. will become a majority–minority nation by 2043, and the numbers of Hispanic–Americans (Hispanic) will more than double in the coming years (U.S. Bureau of Census, 2014). By 2060, one in three people in the U.S. will be Hispanic.Even though there has been relatively little HR research on the cultural values of ethnic minorities in the U. S., some studies found that, on average, they have different values than Anglo-Americans (Bell, Marquardt, & Berry, 2014; Guerrero & Posthuma, 2014; Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). For example, Hispanics, African–Americans, Asian–Americans, and Native Americans are, on average, more likely to endorse collective values than Anglo-Americans (Guerrero & Posthuma, 2014; Stone et al., 2006; Triandis, 1994). In contrast, Anglo-Americans are, on average, more likely to stress individualism than their counterparts, but it should be cautioned that there are within group differences in cultural values for all of these sub-groups (Betancourt & Lopez, 1993).Given the transformation in the composition of the U.S. population, current HR practices may be less effective with employees from diverse backgrounds than those from the dominant group. The primary reason for this is that traditional HR processes were designed for a homogeneous set of employees with individualistic cultural values, and the new workforce is likely to have value systems based on collectivism and familism (e.g., Gelfand et al., 2007; Stone & Stone-Romero, 2008). Thus, organizations will have to have their HR practices modified so that they are aligned with the values of new generations, and the cultural values of diverse employees. As noted above, members of different ethnic subgroups often have distinctive reward preferences, and unique work values, and should react differently than Anglo-Americans to traditional HR processes.Thus, in order to attract and retain subgroup members, organizations may have toalter their current reward and benefit systems to meet the needs of these employees. For example, many ethnic subgroup members are more familistic and collective than AngloAmericans (Phinney, 1996), so they may prefer that organizations offer opportunities for teamwork, work–family balance, time off from work, and group based reward systems. As a result, organizations that develop cafeteria compensation and benefits systems that provide flexibility in terms of reward and benefit allocations may be more attractive to the new workforce than traditional reward systems. For instance, those employees who value familism can choose an extra week of vacation time to spend with their families in lieu of pay or other benefits. Organizations will be able to use these flexible compensation plans to attract talented applicants from all ethnic groups.In view of the coming changes in generational and domestic diversity, organizations are likely to modify their future HR practices to meet the needs of employees with diverse values. To date, most of the research on domestic diversity has focused on unfair discrimination and relational demography (e.g., Stone‐Romero et al., 2003; van Knippenberg et al., 2004). We believe that future HR research will need to be expanded and dig deeper into the value differences, reward preferences, and unique work roles of the new diverse workforce.In our discussion above, we viewed changes in generational and ethnic diversity as a challenge for organizations. However, they can also be considered opportunities for organizations to utilize the many talents and skills that these individuals bring to the workforce, and should provide a wide array of individuals with the chance to display their skills and talents. Furthermore, the altered composition of the workforce should help organizations reach broader markets for their products and services, and increase the innovation and creativity in organizations (van Knippenberg et al., 2004). They should also prompt organizations to develop new HR practices that will meet the needs of all members of the workforce (e.g., cafeteria reward systems) (Stone et al., 2006).4.Emerging use of technologyOver the past 30 years, one of the major drivers of change in HR has been the increased use of information technology (hereinafter referred to as technology) to collect, store, and utilize data for decision-making (e.g., Gueutal & Stone, 2005; Strohmeier, 2007; Strohmeier & Kabst, 2009). Technology, especially, the World Wide Web, has transformed key HR processes in organizations (e.g., e-recruiting, e-selection, e-training), and modified the nature of jobs and the relationships between individuals and organizations (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1984). For example, it has enabled organizations to use the Internet to advertise jobs, and made it possible for applicants to apply for jobs online (e.g., Dineen & Allen, 2013). In addition, organizations are using various forms of technology to deliver training to employees (e.g., the Internet, intranet systems, video conferencing, online simulations; Salas, DeRouin, & Littrell, 2005). Research on the use of technology to facilitate HR processes indicated that it typically enhances efficiency, and decreases costs associated with HR transactions (e.g., Dulebohn & Johnson, 2013; Dulebohn & Marler, 2005; Strohmeier, 2007). However, some researchers argued that there is no clear evidence that it helps HR meets its primary goals of attracting, motivating, and retaining talented employees (see Stone et al., 2015, for a detailed discussion of influence of technology and the future of HR).Despite the increased efficiency and cost savings associated with the use of technology in the field of HR, researchers maintained that there are a number of limitations associated with using current technologies to manage HR processes (e.g., Stone et al., 2015;Stone‐Romero et al., 2003). For instance, information technologies are often static and use one-way communication systems that do not allow applicants or employees to ask questions or gain advice from HR professionals (e.g., benefits). As a result, the technologies can be impersonal, inflexible, and create an artificial distance between supervisors and employees. Likewise, the use of technology for training may be less engaging than traditional methods, and may not give trainees the opportunity to practice or gain feedback. Furthermore, technology may actually transfer the work of HR departments to line managers or employees, which may reduce overall productivity in organizations (Stone‐Romero et al., 2003).In spite of possible limitations associated with using technology to manage HR processes, it will continue to transform the field in the future. Furthermore, it can be argued that new technologies will emerge that should decrease some of the major drawbacks associated with current systems. For instance, a number of researchers argued that the use of new interactive technologies (e.g., Web 2.0, social media, virtual simulations or job fairs, chat rooms, cloud computing, mobile devices) should decrease some of the weaknesses associated with current systems (see Dineen & Allen, 2013; Stone et al., 2015; Sullivan, 2014). For example, the use of social media, chat rooms, and high definition cloud computing should enable applicants and employees to engage in an interactive dialogue with recruiters or managers. Similarly, the use of virtual reality should provide applicants with opportunities to attend virtual job fairs, give supervisors the ability to mentor subordinates, and offer trainees the chance to participate in virtual training simulations. All of these virtual environments should increase the degree to which technology-based HR processes are personal, flexible, interactive, engaging, and decrease the interpersonal distance between employees and supervisors. Although these arguments seem plausible, research will be needed to examine the effectiveness and acceptance of these new HR processes.Despite the fact that we viewed technology as a challenge in the sections above, it should be noted that it also provides new opportunities for the field of HR. For instance, research showed that technology often decreases the administrative burden in HR, increases efficiency, and allows the field to contribute to the strategic direction of organizations (Stone & Dulebohn, 2013). To date, there is no evidence that it helps organizations achieve its primary goals, but we believe that new interactive technologies will facilitate the attraction and retention of critical employees (Stone et al., 2015). One reason for this is that it will allow supervisors and HR professionals to engage in more frequent interaction and communication with employees. As a result, they will be able to identify and meet the needs of critical employees, and ensure that they remain with the organizations. It may also enable organizations to make better HR decisions based on objective information or decision support systems (Dulebohn & Johnson, 2013). Furthermore, it may facilitate interactions with stakeholders insideand outside the organization. For example, supervisors may be able to communicate with external customers in order to improve employees' performance, and HR professionals should be capable of staying abreast of innovative practices used by other organizations (see Ulrich & Dulebohn, 2015, for a detailed discussion of these issues).中文译文：影响人力资源管理未来的挑战和机遇摘要如今，人力资源（HR）管理领域正面临着巨大的变革压力。

人力资源管理薪酬管理中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)Payment managementSince the end of the 20th century, the emerging new economy of the modern enterprise human resources management, including the management pays a higher demand. Economic globalization increasing adaptability, innovation and competitiveness, the right talent management imposed a terrible pressure. The value of expertise was recognized and integrated into the organization and day-to-day management to cope with pressure; unique intellectual capital as a factor of production, replacing wooden side-by-side human capital in the industry, the financial capital in 1997. All these have business or pay Management will bring fundamental changes, which are mainly embodied in the following aspects abuse.Integration in the global economy, trends in the knowledge-based economy, human resources has become the organization to acquire and maintain competitive advantage in key elements. So talent competition will be on a global scale by launching more intense, within the area of human resources are the most direct consequences of the contest is to pay Slumps. All competitors had to pay is higher than the average market price of the salaries, resulting in human resources rolling rising prices. Echoing this, the profit distribution pattern will have a tremendous transformation, knowledge - has value, personnel labor is the voice of increasingly strong gains will be more widely shared and not overly concentrated. Organization of human resources must take a more serious attitude and generous to pay greater human capital investment.Traditional working theory of value will gradually to the market value on transition. Rely on the work of analysis and calculation of the value of traditional working practices will be at a higher level, pay to reflect moreknowledge of the demands of a market economy, the management will pay the creation of a dynamic analysis system to adapt to changing market demand.Salaries and benefits design, design flexibility and multi-track system will become more popular, which contains the rules will be more complicated. "disinter grate" phenomenon will become more common. The salary management, human design colors will be more concentrated, delivered psychological principles rather than principles of economics will play a more important role. Based mainly in the mental age of the knowledge economy, the pay is not purely economics calculation. And even more importantly is the psychology. The meaning will pay more attention to the value rather than the economic value.To stock options as the main form of capital allocation in the future people pay the proportion will continue to expand. And become dominant pattern. Recently, some even offered to natural capital, including environmental, ecological and other non-monetary incentives as a means to the means.Online evaluation and online payments will be part of the enterprises has been highly appreciated. With the advent of the Internet, broadband, wireless communications and technological development, people's work patterns, staff and the concept of enterprise mode of operation will change very much. Working Families, flexible work system and virtual enterprises will become a fashion, by a part of the corporate bandwagon. Online assessment and on-line payment will be widely used many enterprises.The meaning of compensation and compensation managementSalaries and pay the content management Compensation is that the staff turn towards the organizations to provide labor or services and access to various forms of reward or return, is organization paid to their employees of all labor remuneration. Compensation management is the process of enterprise managers refers to the remuneration paid standards of staff, the level of theelements to determine thestructure, distribution and adjustment. The respect of traditional compensation management is material reward, with little consideration on the behavioral characteristics of manager; Moreover modern compensation management shifted the focus to the development of human resources and use, it takes the process of material reward of management and encouraging staff closely fall together ,turn into a unified organic whole.The influence factors of Compensation management Modern compensation management researchers found that the impact of the compensation management have a lot of factors, which can be primarily summed up in the four following factors.(1)External environment factorsImpacting compensation management to the external environment factors including:①Economic environment. Macroeconomic situation and development trend will affect the human resources policy formulation and adjustment.②Social environment. The change of social values will lead to the organization's staff mentality changed: With the staff's level of education and skills enhancement, the compensation system of enterprises must make out the appropriate adjustments for employees of these social changes.③Political environment. Human resources management is always a certain social and political conditions for the environment, must reflect the spirit of country(enterprises) according to law.④Technological environment. Technology environment including the whole process from raw materials and products to the market. In the process from raw materials to the products, any technological breakthroughs and improvements, and the staff of enterprises will all have a tremendous impact, therefore, enterprises must continuously reform the compensation system, to mobilize the enthusiasm of key personnel, the introduction of technology and retain the key personnel, encourage technological innovation, in order to gain the competitive advantages of technology, talent and innovation for enterprises.(2)Organization internal factorsInfluence the organizations of compensation management specific internal factors include : the compensation management of financial capability, human resources and remuneration policies, the scale of enterprises, the culture of enterprises, the structure of enterprises (or flat-level type), and faced life cycle of the specific stages.(3)Work factorsThe influence of work factors of compensation management specific including: work environment, labor intensity, and complexity of the initiative, and challenges and so on. (4)Individual factorsThe impact of individual actors of compensation management including: the laborers’ personal ability, personality, character traits and values, seniority, performance, experience, education, the development potential.In summary, the pay is an integrated with the four elements harmony of management, environment, organizations, and individuals, and continuously the process of effective use, in this process, employees gained the satisfaction and a sense of achievement on labor reward and job, and organizations will complete its goals.The structure, quality and function of compensation, and the motivation theory of compensation .The structure, quality and function of compensationThe structure of compensation Compensation is a complex economic and social phenomenon from different angles can perform various classifications. According to the mechanism of compensation, it can divide into internal and external compensation. (1) Internal compensation Internal compensation means the staff by virtue of their own hard work to get honor, success and liability. Internal compensation include : participation in the decision-making rights, individuals to play the potential job opportunities, independence and freedom to arrange their working hours, more terms, more interested in the work, personal development opportunities, diversification of activities.(2) External compensationExternal compensation means enterprises according tothe staff for the size of contribution they made and that paid the various forms of income to the staff. Its specific manifestations are varied, including wages, bonuses, benefits, allowances and other specific forms: ① Wages .employees as long as works in enterprises, we will be able to get a regular fixed amount of labor remuneration. The narrow wages paid to workers refer to the monetary reward. From the meaning of generalized wages, including laborers monetary and all the remuneration of non-monetary forms. It is now commonly referred to wages, generally refers to generalized wages. As the wages of staff basi c compensation, the basic amount fixed, it provides a more stable source of income to the employees, and meet the minimum needs of life to staff. ②Incentives. Incentives refers to the organization to provide staff with the efforts beyond the normal labor or labor and compensation paid to employees, including its dividend, profit sharing and usually refer to the bonus content. ③Welfare. Welfare also has broad and narrow, the broad welfare includes wages. The narrow welfare refers paid to the staff in addition to wages or salaries and other forms of remuneration, and more to pay in Physical or the form of services, such as social insurance (life insurance, unemployment , endowment insurance, etc.) the free and discounted of work meal, preferential housing, t he provision of free or low-priced canteens bathhouse, clubs, and so on.④Subsidy. Subsidies refers to the wage or salary of enterprises difficult to complete, accurately reflect the situation or the special working conditions of staff and job characteristics and the specific conditions of the additional pay and the cost of living paid staff compensation. These circumstances are: the working environment is detrimental to staff health; The work cause possibility of larger harm to staff; employees involved in the community in some seemingly decent work and so on. People usually associated with the allowance as compensation, and the compensation linked to life as subsidies. According to the compensation defined as the fundamental basis of the compensation classification, the pay can be divided into time, piece-work payand outstanding achievement compensation. In addition, according to the compensation whether the monetary form can be obtained directly, divided into monetary and non-monetary remuneration.The quality and function of compensation.(1)The quality of compensationPay is the same as commodity money contact to a ing the two angles as following to define the quality of compensation. From the point of view of productivity, it is production or other economic activities of human labor input the monetary funds manifestations, is the final cost of the product components. In the conditions of market economy, enterprises mainly through paid to the accounting or measuring production and other economic activities of human labor consumption. Due to the pressure of competition, enterprises must consider cutting labor costs.From the point of view of the relations of production, compensation for the income distribution reflects the outcome of the staff was the allocation of shares. Under the current social system of our country, compensation is the main sources to the means of subsistence consumption of workers. It have a major impact on the level of consumption and the consumption structure , and consumption actually is the process of reproduction labor, reproduction of labor also has an important influence in the next phase of production. Therefore, the compensation’s level has great significance for sustained and stable increase production or promote other economic activities.Such a dual character of compensation, it decided that the compensation management is actually reduce expenditure and income distribution on production costs and that continued to improve pay levels of this contradiction and make an adjustment.(2)The function of compensation The function of compensation may from the enterprises, workers and social aspects to inspect: ①From the point of view of the enterprises, compensation has the following functions: First, the increment functions. Compensation is not only the costs of purchase labor byenterprises, as well as the investment of live working , it will give employers greater than expected cost benefits. The existence of such benefit, provided the impetus mechanism of labor employment and investment labor for the enterprises. Second, the promoting functions. Compensation is a evaluation of workers and operators’ performance, reflect the quality and quantity conditions of work. Therefore, the compensation can promote staff constantly improve their work efficiency and enthusiasm. Third, the coordination functions. While the movement of compensation, put the organization's goals and intentions of managers to employees, correspond the relationship between staff and enterprises, and promote the consi stent of staff’ action and enterprises correspond. On the other hand, the reasonable of compensation’ differentials and structure can effectively mediate the conflict between the employees, and harmony the human relationships. ②From the point of view of the employee, compensation has the following functions: First, the reproduction of labor ensure functions. Staff through the labor and services exchange for compensation, so that they could meet the need of food, clothing, shelter, with the basic needs of life, thereby achieving a reproduction of labor force. Second is to achieve functional value. Compensation is an evaluation for enterprises to pay for their employees, also is the recognition of staff capability and level, is the returns of the implement of individuals value, and the signal of successful promotion, it reflects the employees’ relative position and function in enterprises, it can make the staff have a sense of achievement and satisfaction, and thus inspire greater enthusiasm for the work. Third，reasonable compensation will be strong the trust of enterprise by staff ,buildup the expected increase risk of psychological sense of security and a sense of security for the staff. ③From the point of view of the social, compensation has the relocate function of labor force resources for the social. Most people will be willing to the higher compensation regions, departments and the post. As a manager can use the difference compensation to guide human resourcesreasonable flow, promote the effective distribution for human resources, implement the human resources development and maximize efficiency. In addition, compensation also can apply the occupational value and types of work by people, compensation level to a certain extent reflect the types of work or social values, thereby adjust the people's occupational aspirations and the flows of obtain employment.The Motivation theory of compensation Compensation has always been an attention task, it is not merely related to each person's personal interests, is involved in every organization, the whole community, and even the entire country's socio-economic development. Therefore, compensation is that foreign scholars have always been an important research subject. The Motivation theory of compensation is the basis of the compensation management theory. Motivation is the most important and most basic functions in compensation. How to use the compensation to motivate the staff’ efficiency and enthusiasm, is the core content of compensation study, design and compensation management. Reasonable, fair and competitive compensation is the most important factors to encourage the employees to work hard. Reasonable, and effective compensation management mechanism between prompting is a benign interaction. Effective compensation mechanism must motivate the staff use higher quantity and quality to completed tasks, and higher quantity and quality of work must bring higher compensation. Motivation is a psychology concept, in its essence, it is said that some motivation by the reasons, some occurred motive acts is produced. For example, the same person, why do their sometimes work actively, and sometimes flagging spirit and no mood to work, or even negative go slow? Now, put the motivation concept into management practice, endow a new meaning. That is motivation is a spiritual power or state, the staff has stepped up, inspire and promote the role and instruction or guidance staff conduct at the organization's goals. Therefore, not only to study some kind of motivationhow is, more crucial to examine how to promote the management of a particular object have the motivation how to guide them with their full force to achieve a particular goal. Today's society, more and more motivation by many managers in the implementation guidance and leadership is seen as an important method thus effectively integrate human, using technology to achieve reunification of all employees ,it will also make the personal ease of mind, the achievement of organizational objectives.In the understanding the basis of human, and many scholars research the needs and conduct of human, But it has the same purpose of the study, namely : how to inspire motivation, how to analyze needs, how to determine action, adopted to meet the needs of the people to achieve their basic objective, so as to achieve an effective motivation. At present, domestic and foreign scholars have recognized the main motivation theory: Hierarchy of Needs Theory, Two-factor theory, Equity Theory, Expectancy theory of motivation. This text simply introduce Hierarchy of Needs Theory and Expectancy theory of motivation.Hierarchy of Needs TheoryMaslow put forward the hierarchy of needs theory, it thinks that the needs of human is arisen with the arrangement form, from the junior programs need to begin to move upwards to senior needs. Maslow thinks that it generally has five levels of needs in social life by people: physiological needs, security needs and society needs, respect needs and self-actualization needs.Maslow also considers that when a need to be met, and a higher level of need will occupy the dominant position, the individual needs of the layer to rise. From the point of motivation, no a need will be fully met, However, as long as the meeting is part of the individual will to pursue other aspects of their needs. According to Maslow's view, if we want to inspire someone, it is imperative to understand which hierarchy of needs by the person, then focused on meeting the needs of this level or above this level needs. Maslow's theory gained all-pervading recognition, especially gained the recogniztion from practice by many managers. This is mainly due to the theorysimple and clear, easy to understand the inherent logic. Its maximize usefulness lies in the fact that it points out the need for every person. As managers, in order to effectively, it is necessary to understand their subordinates what is need to meet.Expectancy theory of motivationExpectancy theory of motivation is proposed by Fulumu(V. H. Vroom) who is the United States psychologists. The basic viewpoints of Expectancy theory of motivation is: People expect their actions will help to achieve a certain target circumstances, will be incentive to do certain things together to achieve our goals. Performance is the three function of perceived: expectations, relevance and potency. From the point of view of psychological, Expectancy theory of motivation has three specific psychology relation:First, Effort-performance linkage refers to the perception of individuals through efforts to achieve the desired performance tarts possibility. Second, Performance-reward linkage is a person through a certain level of the efforts to achieve the desired level of pay determined.Finally, Reward attractiveness shows the achievement of the expected results or remuneration received by the individual concerned how much importance. As enterprise managers, Expectancy theory of motivation provides such a management way: every employees in the three psychological linked to the drive, the choice and tropism usually through the four steps :First, the work brings what results to the staff.Second, the results has how much more attractive to the staff.Third, achieve this result, what need to do by the staff.Fourth, From the point of view of staff, achieve such a result needs how much probability of success.Nanjing DE valve factory the problems and causes of compensation management and the analysis of problemCompensation system lack of strategic thinkingIn the reform process of state-owned enterprise, the internal reform of the compensation system is always the summit concerned by all the levels of managers. The reform ofenterprises compensation system throughout the entire process of state-owned enterprises reform. While managers at all levels pay great attention to design and pay system reform in China but the majority of businesses pay system still faced with many problems and shortcomings at present, and many enterprises’ employees is not high satisfaction of the compensation system, the compensation system of enterprises has failed to play the role of incentive, didn’t become the norm to workers. Like other state-owned enterprises. When the Nanjing DE valve factory carry through the compensation management, also not fully understand that the compensation system of enterprises must support and services to the enterprise's strategic goals. Greater extent on the existence of compensation to compensation, distribute the Equity and reasonable into the reform and development process as a goal and not what kind of compensation system will be favorable to corporate strategy and the implement of human resource strategy, Nanjing DE valve factory do not from their own strategies and the overall human resources strategy starting to reform and improve the compensation system, and do not foothold in the enterprise business strategy and human resources strategy, according to labor market, Finally formed enterprises compensation management system. Enterprises lack of management experience in professional human resources management sector in the medium and long term development strategy of Research and decomposition to the enterprise, according to the external market and the development of enterprises and work out development strategies that suit the salary management system, lack of study on compensation management. Although enterprises also pay a certain of reform for compensation system in recent years, but these reforms are not from the height of corporate strategy and the enterprise fails to reflect the strategic objectives and positioning.The illogicality structure of compensation, with the disjoint of market level Due to the inference of traditional structure and the traditional concept,the existing compensation structure of enterprise is relatively average, no reasonable began gap, the price of enterprises compensation and labor market detached from the price of labor market, key positions in the compensation level below the external market compensation level and without external competition; And non-key positions in the compensation higher than the market level. The compensation of ordinary workers is higher than the market price. From the exterior, non-key positions ordinary workers of enterprise whose compensation their salary level higher than the average level in society, one side it increases the cost of human and waste the limited financial of enterprises, as ordinary employees in the labor market, especially in the large population of urban areas is a serious oversupply. There is absolutely no need to pay their high compensation, even paid high wages to stimulate all their enthusiasm, but is not worth from the input and output view of the relative efficiency , form the internal, non-critical positions in higher compensation levels, contrast, key positions on the low compensation levels, it will increase the sense of unfairness in key positions, in the important positions of workersThe staff of some key posts and important positions of the enterprise, their compensation were lower than the prices of market compensation. As we all know, the compensation level of enterprises in the talent market, and even the whole society should certainly attractive, In order to attract and retain talent, it can be overcome competitors. For first-rate talent should be given first-class return. If the key employees and the core staff income lower than the standards of social level, external competitiveness will be relatively weak, it will make the enterprises fail to hold the human, and led to serious unreasonable human resource structure in the enterprise. From the circumstances of investigation by us, on the one hand, many employees discontent the existing compensation system in the reflected rewards; On the other hand, there are many staff can not correctly deal with the compensation gap. Staff on the compensation gap issue of love and hate, this bring a bigresistance to the reform of compensation, even though the good idea is hardly to implement.As enterprise managers, are not to break the original pattern, the result is to make the large contribution of staff and Core staff lost their jobs initiative and creativity, even cause the missing of talent in the enterprises.The re-engineering of compensation management system Nanjing DE valve factory .The ideas of design of compensation system in Nanjing DE valve factory Through the design of compensation in Nanjing DE valve factory, which broke the original pattern of the compensation system, re-designing the compensation structure, recycling a compensation, under a new establishment of the guidance of modern theory of incentives, enterprise operations and staff compensation levels closely fall together, combine the income of employees and work performance closely, It will be able to maximize the mobilization of staff enthusiasm, initiative and creativity, strengthen the staff of responsibility and urgency, improve work efficiency, increase performance, make greatest contribution to meet the development goals of enterprise, to adapt the changes in the internal and external environment, protect the long-term stable and healthy development of the new compensation system. During the process of design of compensation system, and strive to achieve the following objectives: Providing a basic ideas and framework for the compensation of distribution to the enterprises, reasonable structure, strong maneuverability; give priority to efficiency and give consideration to fairness; adhere to equal compensation for equal work, embodied rewards; at the same time, appropriate increasing the total compensation, reasonable widening income gaps.The compensation of production quality piecework system of frontline staff(1)Basic ideas There are 195 front-line workers in the factory, such as latheman, miller, planer, grinder, locksmith and so on, their compensation carry out The compensation of piecework system. Compensation qualitypiecework system is designing for the operation staff, operation staff workload can be directly calculated. Therefore it can use the work measure to account their wages. The compensation of piecework system is that in accordance with the quantity production of qualified products or the volume of completed work by staff, according to a prescribed price calculation piece of a kind of compensation.(2) The structure of compensationIts calculation : The compensation of piecework of frontline production staff per month= The compensation of posts standard ×The completion rate of target output × The completion rate of target cost ×quality coefficient + skills wages + allowance. On one hand, take the compensation of posts standard to maintain the basic completion; On the other hand, the employees revenue linked to the personal performance appraisal. Of which: The completion rate of target output target completion rate = actual output of the month / target yield of the month × 100% The completion rate of target cost = actual cost of the month / target cost of the month × 100% Actual cost = the cost of raw materials +the dynamic power of electric power + wages and the cost surcharge + depreciation + other costs. Quality coefficient: its benchmark value is 1, every workshop section for quality records per day, According to the quality coefficient of assess standard to add or button at the end of month, and gain the quality coefficient of the month. Quality coefficien t = 1.00 – the withheld coefficient of the month + the increase coefficient of the month①Established the compensation standards of posts According to the post of technical difficulty, and intensity of work, working conditions and responsibilities for the size to determine the level posts, different levels to determine the different of the compensation standards of posts. ②Determine the compensation of skills The compensation of skills through technical levels to identify and technical level by the technical assessment results to determine. Under the results of technical evaluation, it will be divided into five technical grade. ③Determination the allowances of postsThe monitor and the teacher is。

The Development of Human Resource Management In China IntroductionWith the advent of the 21st century, Human Resource Management, as a relatively new management subject, is playing a more and more important role in today’s business activities. This report mainly discusses 3 questions about today’s human resource management. The first section discusses the changing function of human resource management in terms of 3 aspects which are staff-company relations, HR model development and HR strategies. The second section describes the exploring stage of HRM in China. System building, recruitment and motivation are the three aspects to support the opinion. The third section discusses the new challenges that HR managers in China may face. In this part, challenges from the changing business age, HR managers’ abilities to deal with uncertainty and ambiguity and solitary to collective activity are discussed.Question 1Human resource management, as the quickly developing subject, without doubt, has changed a lot in its function in many fields. This section will mainly discuss the HRM’s change and expansion in the aspect of staff-company relations, HR model development and HR strategies as the following.In the aspect of the staff-company relations, the changing functions will be discussed from 3 aspects which are power factors, employees and motivational method. First, in terms of the power factors, 10 years ago the relationship between employees and the company was regarded as ‘Labor and Enterprise’ while nowadays more companies show understanding and respect for the human spirit. For example, Google China places a piano in the hall of the company and even set a kitchen and the washing machine for their employees (Jim Westcott, 2005). Second, in terms of the employees, employees are considered as thinking and rational beings around 10 years ago. The reason why they chose this company was the satisfactory salary. But today, staffs are considered as fully evolved, completely satisfied, mature human beings. Third, in the motivational methods aspect, the change is really huge. A decade ago, companies often drove employees through basic needs such as a big bonus. While therole seems to highlight people’s social and intellectual needs.In the aspect of HR model development, some human resource management functions have expanded during the past decade. One of the new products of human resource management is the HR outsourcing which support the core HR activities and business processes associated with HR administration. Outsourcing HR functions or processes is a viable decision for businesses, particularly those whose internal HR department has reached the limit of its effectiveness; businesses that want to access new programs or services (but don't want to incur the required investment), or those that want to focus on core competencies. The advantage of HR outsourcing is obvious: Obtaining access to (internally) unavailable expertise, skills, technologies; increased flexibility; reducing costs/reduce investment. This way has achieved great success in some countries, for example, Canada. Spending on HR outsourcing in Canada, is forecast to increase by more than 13%, on average, every year between 2005 and 2009 (Jim Westcott, 2005).The majority of HR strategies have been developed over the last decade. Twenty per cent of respondents indicate that an HR strategy has been in place at their institution for less than three years, 60% report that the HR strategy was developed in the past three to seven years and 20% indicate that the strategy is ten or more years old. These data reinforce the notion that HR management has taken on a much more strategic role within the past decade. The HR strategy in recruitment and retention can be discussed in long-term goals as well as shorter-term operational procedures. In terms of recruitment and retention some institutions are primarily concerned with short-term objectives. For example, one Canadian respondent stated that their HR strategy involves ‘an annual recruitment and retention plan that g overns academic staff hiring and retention for the following academic year’ (Ronold G Ehrenbdeg, 2005). Other responses highlight long-term objectives and broader issues relating to staff development and performance as well as policy and strategic planning for future institutional growth. For example, one Australian institution states that their HR strategy is concerned with ‘workforce planning, age profiling, attraction and retention issues, and reengineering the recruitment process’. The general focus of this strategyis on strategic planning for successive generations.Question 2With China's entering the WTO, modern enterprise management concept has been gradually accepted by Chinese enterprises and, human resources management has been developed and promoted in the majority of enterprises. However, as a management skill that gets access to China less than 30 years and faced with the cultural conflict, HRM in China still stays in the exploring stage.In the aspect of system building, human resources management system in China is imperfect still. According to the recent report of HR in China, less than forty percent of the enterprises have established the business development strategy combining with human resources management system. Furthermore, only 12.9% of them can really implement this strategy. What is more, employees’ career development planning, staff representation system, and the staff Rationalized suggestion are the 3 strategies that are not completed enough. Only 9% of the researched enterprise s establish and implement the employees’ career development planning (Zhao Yin, 2007).In terms of the recruitment, the forms of recruitment in Chinese enterprises are not diversified enough. Although the modern enterprises can recruit through more and more channels such as networks, an executive search firm, job fairs, campus recruitment, advertising media and so many ways that can provide companies with human resources information, the majority of the companies still choose form as job fairs. However, ac cording to the ‘2007 Human Resource Report’, the percentage of the surveyed companies which have been tried to recruit through network was 35%, which was 12% higher than that of the year 2006. Secondly, the technologies during the recruitment that the companies use are still in a growing stage. Only half of the enterprises plan to use professional test tool to find suitable staff. Ways like knowledge test, psychological test and presentation are introduced in China recently and are welcomed.The motivation in China is at a developing stage. Most Chinese companies have motivation strategies. Quite a few of them prefer to choose short-term and directmotivating strategies like paying. At present, China has 70% of the enterprises in accordance with different types of personnel to set different pay scales (Zhao Yin, 2007). Paying is a common kind of economic motivation. Paying incentives for executives directly show in their steady growth of income - wages, which is very intuitive. However, with the raise of exe cutives’ social status and overall ability, material and money are no longer the key point of motivation. Research from China Database, one of the most authority databases, show that 19.6% of the surveyed enterprises use virtual equity of the company as the long-term motivation methods and 18.9% of them use the form of giving share options as the long-term motivation, while 78.2% of the enterprises have not implemented the long-term motivation. As one of the ways to motivate staff, long-term also includes creating a platform for employees which may attract employees since they can exert their abilities fully. Question 3As the functions of human resource have changed since the 21st century, challenges are coming to the human resource managers in China. For China is still in the exploring stage mentioned in question 2, the challenges should be more than those in developed human resource management countries. In the information era, the economic era and the knowledge, the challenges for Chinese HRM managers are mainly from these three fields.The first challenges for HRM is the changing role of organizations from the Industrial Age to the Information Age. Work performed in factories by machines is being replaced by work in offices or at computer terminals. And instead of working with things, people increasingly work with ideas and concepts. Information and knowledge have replaced manufacturing as the source of most new jobs. Thus, taking charge of thousands of workers in a factory is not the typical functions of modern human resource managers. Although the numbers of employees may decrease, but the extent of difficulty will not decrease since employees are more knowledgeable and informative.Like the popular saying nowadays ’The only thing that doesn’t change is change’, with the development of the technologies, tools that human being use speed up thepace of people’s life. Thus the second challenge which may face the human resource manager is the abilities to deal with uncertainty and ambiguity. Static, permanent organizations designed for a stable and predictable world are giving way to flexible, adaptive organizations more suited for a new world of change and transformation. Emphasis on permanence, tradition and the past is giving way to creativity and innovation in the search for new solutions, new processes, and new products and services. Maintaining the status is less important than a vision of the future and the organization's destiny. We are used to dealing with certainty and predictability. We need to become accustomed to dealing with uncertainty and ambiguity.The next challenges will be the ability of HR managers to adapt from muscular to mental work (Alexandria, 1997). Repetitive physical labor that doesn't add value is increasingly being replaced by mental creativity. Routine and monotony are giving way to innovation and a break with tradition. In the past, people were considered to be merely workers, an old concept that associated people with things. Now people are considered purveyors of activities and knowledge whose most important contributions are their intelligence and individual talents. We are used to dealing with physical, repetitive manual labor; we need to become accustomed to dealing with mental, creative, and innovative work.What is more, another problem that may challenge HR managers in China is to organize employee to finish projects from solitary to collective activity (FangCai, 2005). With the rising difficulty of complex and technology, it is almost impossible for only one person to finish a project. Thus teamwork is supplanting individual activity. The old emphasis on individual efficiency (on which the total efficiency of the organization depended) is being replaced by group synergy. It's a matter of multiplying efforts, rather than simply adding them. We are used to individualized, isolated work; we need to change to high-performance teamwork. Thus the function of human resource managers is to offer the company the suitable person and coordinate the relationship among the team, especially in China, a country that highlights relationship and harmony very much.ConclusionThis article first analyses the changed functions of human resource management nowadays. In terms of the staff-company relations, a trend of closer and humane relationship between staff and companies emerges. The model of HR outsourcing is showing its strong competitiveness and may become one of the main way that HR management to use. Secondly, this article states that China today still stays in the exploring stage of human resource management. The uncompleted HRM system building, the single form of recruitment, the growing interview technologies and the lack of long- term motivation in Chinese enterprises, all these facts shows that China has a long way to go in the development of HRM. Thirdly, Challenges for HRM managers in China are tough and numerous. Changes from the Industrial Age to the Information Age, stability to change, muscular to mental work lead the challenges for Chinese HRM managers. To sum up, it is a long way to go for the development of human resource management in China.人力资源管理在中国的发展导言随着二十一世纪的到来，人力资源管理作为一个相对较新的管理问题，扮演了一个越来越重要的作用在当今的商业中。

人力资源管理系统中英文对照外文翻译文献Human resource management systems (HRMS) have e essential tools for businesses of all sizes。

including small offices with just 20 XXX using HRMS。

firms can improve their efficiency and ce the time and money XXX。

HRMS XXX。

XXX difficult economic times。

XXX of their business。

including human resources.HRIS are packages are designed to address HR needs。

including planning。

employee n access。

XXX the company's current and future HR needs。

businesses can determine which HRMS features will be most useful for their specific needs。

For example。

HRMS can help with recruitment。

training。

performance management。

XXX.Once the planning stage is complete。

businesses XXX This includes automating tasks such as employee data management。

benefits n。

XXX employees。

providing them with access toimportant n such as company policies。

人力资源管理论文参考文献（英文）引言人力资源管理在当代组织中起着至关重要的作用。

为了更好地理解和研究人力资源管理领域的相关问题，学者们进行了大量的研究和研究论文。

本篇文章收集了一些经典的人力资源管理领域的英文参考文献，供读者参考和阅读。

文献列表1.Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2004). The science of training: Adecade of progress. Annual review of psychology, 55(1), 55-85.2.Cascio, W. F. (2018). Managing human resources: Productivity, qualityof work life, profits. McGraw-Hill Education.3.Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives forstrategic human resource management. Journal of management, 18(2), 295-320.4.Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and performance:still searching for some answers. Human resource management journal, 27(1), 3-22.5.Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture:Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy ofmanagement review, 24(1), 31-48.6.Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human re sourcemanagement practice. Kogan Page Publishers.7.Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resourcemanagement. Palgrave.8.Snell, S. A., & Bohlander, G. W. (2012). Managing human resources.Nelson Education.9.Ulrich, D., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2015). Are we there yet? What’s next forHR?. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 188-204.10.Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource managementpractices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance.Academy of management journal, 38(3), 635-672.结论这篇文章列举了一些经典的人力资源管理领域的英文参考文献，这些文献涵盖了人力资源管理的各个方面，包括培训、策略、绩效、员工流动等。

人力资源管理参考文献2020英文引言人力资源管理作为现代企业管理中的重要一环，对于企业的发展至关重要。

随着社会的不断发展和变化，人力资源管理领域也在不断创新和进步。

本文旨在介绍2020年的人力资源管理参考文献，为人力资源从业者和研究人员提供更新领域知识的参考。

研究领域分类人力资源规划1.Bechet, T. P. (2020). Strategic staffing: A comprehensive system foreffective workforce planning. SHRM Foundation.–这本书讲述了战略性人力资源规划的重要性以及如何建立一个有效的人力资源规划系统。

2.Cappelli, P., & Tavis, A. (2020). The performance managementrevolution: Business results through insight and action. Harvard Business Press.–本书介绍了如何通过绩效管控来实现业务目标，并提供实操建议。

人才招聘与选择1.Salopek, J. J. (2020). Hiring winners: Profile, interview, evaluate: Aguide to successful hiring. Greenleaf Book Group.–本书提供了招聘成功的关键策略、面试技巧和候选人评估方法。

2.Sartain, L., & Finney, B. (2020). Branding for talent: Eight essentials tomake your employer brand work for you. Wiley.–该书解释了如何通过塑造雇主品牌吸引和留住人才，并提供了实用的建议和策略。

培训与发展1.Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development. McGraw-HillEducation.–这本书介绍了员工培训和发展的重要性，以及如何设计和实施有效的培训计划。