凯文英语中心,复旦投毒案二审维持原判
- 格式：doc
- 大小：47.50 KB
- 文档页数：2
【复旦投毒案二审维持原判林森浩愿捐遗体求社会宽恕】近日，上海市高级人民法院对林森浩涉嫌故意杀人案进行了公开宣判，裁定驳回林森浩的上诉，维持一审法院作出的死刑判决。
复旦投毒案二审宣判后，林森浩再次写下家书，希望父母接受死刑事实，及早走出阴影，他请求父母将他的存款全用来买书，给家里的兄弟姐妹和后代们看，告诫他们“开卷有益”。
还把自己珍藏的《红楼梦》送给了发小。
“此生虽然短暂，之前都投入到学业中，缺乏心灵的滋养，导致酿成大错，最后这几年在司法的漩涡中，身不由己，我希望这最后一件事，能做对。
”复旦大学研究生林森浩在得知二审判决维持死刑原判后发表的声明，值得一读。
一个只有好成绩，而缺乏健全人格、爱的能力的孩子，对他人、对自己都是危险的。
The Shanghai High People's Court Thursday upheld the death sentence for a graduate student who poisoned a schoolmate at a prestigious university in Shanghai, even as the defendant's lawyer and family member questioned the evidence.
In April 2013, Fudan University graduate student Huang Yang died after drinking from the water fountain in the dormitory. The police concluded that Huang was poisoned, and succumbed to liver and kidney failure. Lin Senhao, Huang's roommate, was formally arrested one month later.
Lin was sentenced to death for intentional homicide in February 2014 by the Shanghai No.2 Intermediate People's Court. Lin appealed the decision, and the Shanghai High People's Court heard the appeal on December 8, 2014.
What Lin had done was cruel and had created a very negative social impact, according to the court, adding that the court could not give a lesser punishment, even though Lin confessed.
In a black jacket, Lin remained calm after the judge announced the verdict on Thursday. He wrote a few statements later, saying although he's not satisfied with the final judgment, he still believes that the judicial system is fair.
Lin stressed that he did not intend to kill Huang and offered to donate his body to a hospital if he is executed.
Lin's father insisted that the court had sentenced his son to death without solid evidence. "The police had based their case entirely on my son's confession. They didn't have any other evidence," said the father while sobbing, adding that he would continue to fight on."I'm puzzled why they announced the verdict so quickly to take away my son's life," he added.
It took nearly three months for the Shanghai No.2 Intermediate People's Court to decide after the first hearing was held in November 2013. But the Thursday judgment was made a month after the second hearing.
"This is in no way a valid verdict. The court didn't accept the testimony made by Hu Zhiqiang [a medical legal expert who told the court at the second hearing that Huang died of acute viral hepatitis B according to his analysis], and it didn't offer a proper explanation why," said Si Weijiang, Lin's lawyer.
Si said the verdict failed to answer any of the questions raised during the second hearing, including why the poison identification test was not made with blood samples and liver tissues from the victim's body.
"Earlier tests that confirmed the existence of the poisonous chemical were carried out with specimen that had been passed from several of Huang's classmates. The evidence we provided also shows that a small amount of the chemical widely exists in human blood, tap water and smoke. It could have long been there in Huang's body," Si said.。
