Looking at Gender Role in Language Change from a New Perspective

  • 格式:doc
  • 大小:32.50 KB
  • 文档页数:3

Looking at Gender Role in Language Change from a NewPerspectiveAbstract:Variationist sociolinguists using quantitative methods and qualitative methodsto study language change (typically,sound change) in progress developed an early account of the relationship of gender to change,which laid emphasis on the “status-consciousness” and “linguistic insecurity” of women. On the other hand,the account under social constructionist approach suggests that women are more dependent than men on symbolic resources for asserting identity and group membership; that is,they often use language as a symbol to claim their status in the social construct network.The research results from studies under both variationist and constructionist approaches show that gender is an important social variable or factor in the study of language change. In terms of the evaluation of the two major approaches applied,either of them has some drawbacks and needs to be refined. Furthermore it will be better to integrate the approaches so that different aspects concerning the study of gender role in language change can be grasped and interpreted by different approaches which can complement each other.Key words:gender; language change; Variationist Approach; Social Constructionist Approach1 Understanding the Terms1.1 Understanding GenderIn defining gender,Lewontin (1982,cited in Coulmas,2001) stresses the relevance of the socializati on process: the development of gender identity “depends on what label was attached to him or her as a ch ild… Thus biological differences became a signal for,rather than a cause of,differentiation in social roles.” That explains gender as socially determined sets of behaviors (i.e. ‘masculine’or ‘feminine’) assigned to people based on their biological sex (i.e. male or female). People who are born biologically female,for example,may be expected to like the dolls but not baseball; people who are born biologically male may be expected to like baseball but not the dolls. From this definition we can distinguish gender from sex. To put it sim ply,Gender is not something we are born with,and n ot something we have,but something we do (West and Zimmerman,1987,cited in Eckert,2003) - something we perform (Butler,1990,cited in Eckert,2003). The definition given by Lewontin connects the impact of societal norms and evaluations and the role ofsocialization. Thus genders can be talked of in the plural form,because what it means to be a woman or to be a man changes among generations and is different for different racial,ethnic,and religious groups,as well as for members of different social classes. A further aspect which should be included is the negotiation of gender in the actual interaction. This leads us to the understanding of gender “as a rou tine,methodical,and recurring accomplishment… ‘doing gender’[emphasis by the authors] is undertaken by men and women,doing gender involves a complex of socially guided perceptual,interactional,and micropolitical activities that cast particular pursuits as expressions of masculine and feminine natures (West and Zimmerman,1991,cited in Coulmas,2001).A typical example is the research carried out by Penelope Eckert,as mentioned above in the illustration of performing gender. She investigated the speech of Detroit high school students who could be categorized around the contrast between “jocks” and “burnouts”. The contrast was also marked linguistically,with particular phonological variables being appropriated differentially to mark either jock or burnout identity. In both the jock and the burnout groups,young women were more advanced than young men in their use of the innovative variants marking group membership. This kind of status sought by the young women can not be explained as prestige associated since it is the change from below; rather,they want to symbolize their status as good jocks or good burnouts by carrying their use of variants that function as group identity markers. She found that girls pronounced three vowels differently from boys,but did not themselves constitut e a uniform group. Instead,the girls were using language in order to polarize themselves as either jocks or burnouts. In other words,the girls were using language to perform both a gender and a jock or burnout identity.2.2.1 Gender differentiated patterns interpreted under social constructionist approachIn illustrating gender as an influence on language shift,Susan Gal’s classic study of the Austrian town of Oberwart and Don Kulick’s study of Gapun,a small and remote village in Papua New Guinea,prove that language change is the product of choices made by social actors using linguistic variation as a symbolic resource (Cameron,2003). Gal’s study is in Oberwart,where Hungarian is associated with a peasant identity while German with a worker identity. The symbolic association caused languages to be evaluated differently by women and men because of the gender unattractiveness of peasant life to women. The result is the to wn’s language change from bilingualism to monolingualism,causing the predictable language shift to German in this society. Don Kulick’s study is in Gapun where gender may be part of what a language actually symbolizes. The contrast between Taiap and Tok Pisin symbolizes a series of contrasts. Taiap is associated with ancestral past;Top pisin with modernization,development and Christianization. The contrast also symbolizes a local contrast between hed (willfulness,thus wo man) and save (knowledge,thusman). Both underwrites and reinforces their symbolic gendering. This symbolic association leads to the shift towards Tok Pisin.Don Kulick’s study of Gapun also shows gender’s influences on Pidgin and Creole Development. In the development of Pidgins,it is,at first,predominantly associated with men,when it is used among women it’s associated with prostitutes. But when women do begin to use pidgin languages,this has potentially far-reaching consequences for subsequent linguistic change.In analyzing gender ideologies as an influence on language change,both Cameron and Montgomery observe that the symbolically feminine speech style is now gaining prestige. Following this trend,can we predict the direction of language change as feminine patterns?Or alternatively,the gendered language ideology will change in the future?This needs our further study in the future.。