托福(阅读)历年真题试卷汇编4(题后含答案及解析)
- 格式:doc
- 大小:93.50 KB
- 文档页数:18
托福(阅读)历年真题试卷汇编4 (题后含答案及解析)
题型有: 3. Reading Comprehension
Sections Three:Reading Comprehension
Early Theories of Continental DriftP1: The idea that the geography of Earth was
different in the past than it is today is not new. As far back as 1620, Francis Bacon
spotted that the west coast of Africa and the east coast of South America looked as if
they would fit together, like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Between then and 1912, other
people identified further similarities between other continental coastlines. But because
much of the early support for mobilism was based on far-flung intercontinental
similarities, geologists tended to be skeptical of the fieldwork of others.P2: During the
late nineteenth century, Austrian geologist Eduard Suess proposed the name
“Gondwanaland” in his book The Face of the Earth (1885) and gave far greater
emphasis to the evolutionary nature of the earth and he noted the similarities among
the Late Paleozoic plant fossils of India, Australia, South Africa, and South America.
Based upon glossopteris fern fossils in such regions, he explained that the three land
masses were once connected in a supercontinent which he names Gondwanaland, and
that the ocean flooded the spaces currently between those lands. Thus, in his view, the
similarities of fossils on these continents could be accounted for by postulating the
concept of a land bridge that existed once but subsided later.P3: Later, a number of
refinements to Suess’s theory were made. The American geologist Frank Taylor
published a pamphlet in 1910 presenting his concept of “horizontal displacement”. He
explained the formation of mountain ranges as a result of the lateral movements of
continents. With the earth’s capture of the moon, the gravitational forces between
them generated a pull towards lower latitudes where they thickened and formed
folded mountain belts especially in middle latitudes. Although we now know that
Taylor’s explanation of continental drift is erroneous, one of his most significant
contributions was his suggestion that the Mid-Atlantic Ridge— an underwater
mountain range discovered by the 1872-1876 British HMS Challenger expeditions—might mark the site at which an ancient continent broke apart, forming the present-day
Atlantic Ocean.P4: However, it is Alfred Wegener, a German meteorologist, who is
generally credited with developing the hypothesis of continental drift. In his
monumental book, The Origin of Continents and Oceans (1915), Wegener theorized
that a single supercontinent he called “Pangaea” existed sometime between 350
million to 225 million years ago. Wegner portrayed his grand concept of continental
movement in a series of maps showing the breakup of Pangaea and the movement of
various continents to their present-day locations. What evidence did Wegener use to
support his hypothesis of continental drift? First, Wegener noted that there is
geographical similarity along both the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean. The opposing
coasts of the Atlantic can be fitted together in the same way as two cut off pieces of
wood can be refitted. Furthermore, mountain ranges and glacial deposits seem to
match up in such a way that suggests continents could have once been a single
landmass. Finally, many of the same fossils and vegetative remains are found today
on widely separated continents, indicating that the continents must have been in
proximity at one time. During his days, Wegener was regarded as an advocate rather
than as an impartial scientific observer, appearing to ignore vast evidence unfavorable
to his ideas and distort other evidence to bring it into harmony with the theory.P5:
After Wegener’s death, a South African geologist Alexander Du Toit continued to
assemble fossil evidence for Pangaea. He noted that fossils of the now extinct reptile
“Mesosaurus” occur in rocks of the same age in both Brazil and South Africa.
Because the physiology of freshwater and marine animals is completely different, it is
hard to imagine how a freshwater reptile could have swum across the Atlantic Ocean
and then found a freshwater environment nearly identical to its former habitat.
Moreover, if Mesosaurus could have swum across the ocean, its fossil remains should
be widely dispersed. It is more logical to assume that Mesosaurus lived in lakes in
what were once adjacent areas of South America and Africa when it was united into a
single continent. Notwithstanding all of the empirical evidence in favor of continental
drift theory presented here, most geologists at the time refused to entertain the
idea.P6 :The debate over continental drift has the same role and stature in the history
of the earth sciences as the debate over Darwinian evolution in the history of life
sciences and the debates over relativity and quantum theory in the history of physics.