当前位置：文档之家 › Evaluation

Evaluation

  • 格式：docx
  • 大小：18.50 KB
  • 文档页数：2

Evaluation definition:

The process of critically observing, measuring and monitoring the implementation of an event to assess

its outcomes accurately. It requires accurate assessment of benefits and costs associated with the event.

It need strong financial support from government and dependent upon the funding mechanism

(Tags: MMO, implementation, outcomes, BC Assessment)

Process:

Government--------Use a proportion to subsidize the production of an event or the development of a facility

Event-----------------Attracts out-of-town visitors who spend money in the local community

Money outside-----Create income and jobs in the community for residents (Return)

Evaluation Stage (Three key phases):

1. Pre-event evaluation (Feasibility)

Examples: Business plan/ Preparation of bids/ Establishment of vision, mission/ Concept development

Aspects:

Political: Need support, Current political climate, meet local government objectives

Logistical: Infrastructure/ equipment necessary/ outsource

Socio-cultural: Support of the community/ Benefit for community/ opportunities for partnership exist

Economic: Market characteristics and level of demand/ Location factors that influence viability/ financial

aspects including projected revenue and operating costs

Case Study: MEAS (Major Event Assessment Statement)

Background category: History/ Government involvement in bidding process

Event details: Type/ timing/ Expected Revenue/ Contract details/ Proposed management structure

Economic Impact Industry Employment impact: Creation of jobs/ Infrastructure/ Export and local opportunities Tourism impact: Number/ Duration/ Induced tourism

International profile

Calendar fit: Options for links with other events

Government priorities: meeting of government objectives

Risk management and budget: Revenue and rate of return on investment/ Risks/ Details of underwriting

funding options

2. Monitoring and control process (During implementation/ In term)

Monitoring operational performance, test of 2-way communications, staff attendance, security, health and

safety and crowd attitude

3. Post-event evaluation (Outcomes)

Financial report/ Emergency services/ Customer surveys

Data used:

Primary: event sits/ venues, competitors, quantitative surveys and qualitative that focus groups

- Quantitative Data (In the form of numbers)

Surveys/ Event numbers such as visitor spend/ Content analysis such as social media monitoring

- Qualitative Data (In the form of words, pictures or actions)

Interviews/ Tweets social media/ Pictures/ Observation

Secondary: Public documents (newspapers, books, government statistics), Historical data, Anuual

reports, Academic studies

Survey:

Measurement bias: choose tools that give truthful or accurate measures

Validity: accurately captures meaning of abstract concepts

Reliability: Measure concept consistently

Data collection: Telephone interviews/ mail/ post-event or on-site interviews

Consider the purpose/ want to know/ type of data need to collect/ sampling participant (Demographics

such as age, education and gender/ Psychographics such as interest and attitude/ Spend/ Consumer

Behavior/ Event experience)

Avoid biased/ leading/ yes or no question

合集下载

EVALUATION

EVALUATION

EVALUATION

GWD-1-Q18:

It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except in professional

medical journals or by mail directly to physicians. A proposed law would allow

general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that, in

general, laypersons lack the specialized knowledge to evaluate such

advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications.

But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for

a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern.

两股力量：医师，受蛊惑的病人

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the

argument?

Whether nonprescription medications can interact with and block the action of

any prescription medications that could be advertised to the general public

Effective evaluation

Effective evaluation

EFFECTIVEEVALUATIONTips and Techniques forGiving Helpful EvaluationsWHERE LEADERS ARE MADEEVALUATIOEFFECTIVENTOASTMASTERS INTERNATIONALP.O. Box 9052 • Mission Viejo, CA 92690 USAPhone: 949-858-8255 • Fax: /members© 2011 Toastmasters International. All rights reserved. Toastmasters International, the Toastmasters International logo, and all other Toastmasters International trademarks and copyrights are the sole property of Toastmasters International and may be used only with permission. Item 202 2011 Rev. 6/WHERE LEADERS ARE MADE

2 EFFECTIVE EVALUATIONCONTENTSIntroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3When You Are the Evaluator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3The Evaluator’s Role . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3How to Prepare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Your Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4How You Say It . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Your Delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5As You Conclude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Follow Up with the Speaker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Follow Up with the Audience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6When You Are the Speaker or Leader . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Put Some Variety into Evaluations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Would You Like to Learn More? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Recommended Evaluation Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

evaluation 翻译

evaluation 翻译

evaluation 翻译

基本解释

 evaluation：评估，评价

 /ɪˌvæljuˈeɪʃən/

 n. 评估，评价

变化形式

 复数形式：evaluations

具体用法

 n.:

o 评估，评价

o 同义词：assessment, appraisal, estimation, judgment, analysis

o 反义词：ignorance, neglect, disregard, indifference, oversight

o 例句：

 The evaluation of the new employee's performance took

longer than expected because the manager wanted to ensure

a thorough review. (新员工表现的评估比预期的要长，因为经理想确保彻底的审查。)  After the evaluation of the project, the team decided to

implement several changes to improve efficiency and reduce

costs. (在项目评估之后，团队决定实施一些改变以提高效率并降低成本。)

 The teacher's evaluation of the student's essay highlighted

both strengths and areas for improvement, providing

valuable feedback. (老师对学生作文的评估突出了优点和需要改进的地方，提供了有价值的反馈。)

 The evaluation process for the grant applications was

rigorous, ensuring that only the most deserving projects

EVALUATION 2

EVALUATION 2

简历中的自我评价用语

1. Mature，dynamic and honest．

思想成熟、精明能干、为人诚实。

2. Excellent ability of systematical management．

有极强的系统管理能力。

3. Ability to work independent1y，mature and resourcefu1．

能够独立工作、思想成熟、应变能力强。

4. A person with ability plus flexibility should app1y. 需要有能力及适应力强的人。

5. A stable personality and high sense of responsibility are desirable. 个性稳重、具高度责任感。

6. Work well with a multi-cultural and diverse work force. 能够在不同文化和工作人员的背景下出色地工作。

7. Bright，aggressive applicants.

反应快、有进取心的应聘者。

8. Ambitious attitude essential．

有雄心壮志。

9. Initiative，independent and good communication skill．

积极主动、独立工作能力强，并有良好的交际技能。

10. Willing to work under pressure with leardership quality．

愿意在压力下工作，并具领导素质。

11. Willing to assume responsibilities. 应聘者须勇于挑重担。

12. Mature，self-motivated and strong interpersonal skills. 思想成熟、上进心强，并具极丰富的人际关系技巧。