新GRE 北美范文精析 Issue 36 范文精析

GRE北美Issue范文:知识进步某个程度上体现了政治权威下面为大家介绍了新GRE北美写作范文，主要关于知识进步某个程度上体现了政治权威的相关内容，同学们可适当进行参考，以便更充分地准备GRE考试！更多GRE考试资料，请咨询小马过河GRE频道电话400-0123-267！"Great advances in knowledge necessarily involve the rejection of authority."The speaker claims that great advances in knowledge necessarily involve rejection of authority. To the extent that political authority impedes such advances, I agree with this claim. Otherwise, in my view most advances in knowledge actually embrace certain forms of authority, rather than rejecting authority out of hand.One striking example of how political authority can impede the advancement of knowledge involves what we know about the age and evolution of planet Earth. In earlier centuries the official Church of England called for a literal interpretation of the Bible, according to which the Earth's age is determined to be about 6,000 years. IfWestern thinkers had continued to yield to the ostensible authority of the Church, the fields of structural and historical geology would never have advanced beyond the blind acceptance of this contention as fact.A more modern example of how yielding to political authority can impede the advancement of knowledge involves the Soviet Refusenik movement of the 1920s. During this time period the Soviet government attempted not only to control the direction and the goals of its scientists' research but also to distort the outcome of that research. During the 1920s the Soviet government quashed certain areas of scientific inquiry, destroyed entire research facilities and libraries, and caused the sudden disappearance of many scientists who were engaged in research that the state viewed as a potential threat to its power and authority. Not surprisingly, during this time period no significant advances in scientific knowledge occurred under the auspices of the Soviet government.However, given a political climate that facilitates free thought and honest intellectual inquiry, great advances in knowledge can be made by actually embracing certain forms of "authority." A good example involves modern computer technology. Only by building on, or embracing, certain well-established laws of physics were engineers able to develop silicon-based semi-conductor technology. Although new biotechnology research suggests that organic, biochemical processors will replace artificial semi-conductors as the computers of the future, it would be inappropriate to characterize this leap in knowledge as a rejection of authority.In sum, to the extent that political authority imposes artificial constraints on knowledge, I agree that advances in knowledge might require rejection of authority. Otherwise, in my observation advances in knowledge more typically embrace and build on authoritative scientific principles and laws, and do not require the rejection of any type of authority.小马过河编辑为大家整理了新GRE考试中写作部分的一些素材，主要是一篇北美GRE作文范文，供各位新GRE考生进行参考。

GRE阅读36篇译文Exercise 11.1与博弈理论相关的是某些寄生黄蜂的性别比率，他们拥有大量的雌蜂。

在这些蜂类中，受精卵孵化为雌蜂，未受精卵孵化为雄蜂。

雌蜂储存精子，她产的每个卵子是否受精都由雌蜂决定。

根据F的基因理论，生物倾向于这样的性别比例，即能够拥有最多数量的后代，因此能最大程度复制并传递基因，为此，产生等量的雌性和雄性后代对他们是有利的。

H认识到这些卵都在宿主，即另外的昆虫的幼虫中孵化；而且，新产生的成蜂马上交配二手很快消失，对这些现象的认知，提供了更让人信服的分析。

由于通常一个宿主幼虫只有一个雌蜂产卵，因此只孵化一只雄蜂便可获益匪浅，因为这只雄蜂可以使同时孵化出的所有的雌蜂都受精。

和F一样，H也在寻找生物进化的稳定策略，但是他更深入了一步，认识到他正在寻找这样的策略。

1.2T学者很显然是错误所谓。

J时代的美国并不是一个流动易变、平均主义的社会，个人富有和贫困只是一时的情况。

至少根据P的理论，他对美国1825-1850年极富人群的研究破除了传统观念。

为了证明这个极富阶级确实存在，P提供了大量的事例和一些让人耳目一新、清楚明了的数据。

虽然这些富人也活跃于商业和一些行业，但是大多数富人的财富不是白手起家的，而是家族世袭的。

金融风暴使得资本少的人倾家荡产，而这些富人却得以保存并且好发无损。

事实上，在一些城市这些最富裕的人的比例还继续增长，到1850年拥有一半的社会财富。

虽然这些观察是真实情况，但是P根据这些得出结论，认为美国在18世纪晚期形成的无可争议的不平等在J执政时期依然持续，美国在工业革命之前就已经是一个阶级分化严重，财阀统治的社会，未免言过其实。

1.3所谓厌氧糖酵解，是指能量在无氧状态下通过肌肉糖原分解为能量物——物乳酸和ATP的过程。

厌氧能量产生的多少与糖原的多少相关——在所有脊椎动物中大约是他们肌肉敬重的0.5%。

这样，脊椎动物厌氧能量的储存和动物的体积成正比。

比如如果捕食者攻击一个重达100吨的恐龙，这些恐龙尽管行动迟缓，但是他们通过厌氧糖酵解产生的即时能量相当于3000个人通过有氧代谢产生的能量。

2024年GRE范文精讲：北美GRE范文精讲GRE作为北美地区研究生入学考试之一，是全球多所顶尖大学的研究生入学申请必备考试之一。

在2024年的GRE考试中，各位考生需要掌握的范围不仅包括基础的数学运算和英语语法知识，还需要对一些热门话题有深刻的了解和思考。

本篇文章将帮助各位考生精讲2024年北美GRE范文，希望能够帮助你顺利通过GRE考试。

Issue Essay2024年GRE考试的Issue Essay题目如下："Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Students should take courses such as philosophy, history and literature, regardless of their majors. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?"这个Issue Essay写作题目，主要是考察考生对高等教育的理解和对多元化知识的重视。

以下是一份优秀范文：Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. While students often enter college with a particular major in mind, they may not have a well-rounded education or the necessary skills to succeed in their future careers if they only take classes in their field. Thus, I strongly agree with the statement that a student’s education and training should encompass a range of disciplines, including such subjects as philosophy, history, and literature.First and foremost, a broad array of course work provides students with a more comprehensive worldview. In college courses, students who hold differing viewpoints are often interacting for the first time. The liberal arts classes provide a platform for them todiscuss differences in a respectful manner and gain a perspective on cultures and viewpoints from instructors and classmates who they may never have otherwise met. This will help a student broaden their perspective and will help create well-rounded individuals.Secondly, courses outside a student’s major often have a strong academic connection to that major. For example, philosophy isclosely tied to the field of computer science. In the area ofartificial intelligence, there are significant debates about the ethics of using such technology. Studying philosophy can help computer students understand the responsible ways of practice for technology. Enrolling in various classes may help build specific skills and provide a wider range of knowledge that will be useful in their future careers.Finally, courses outside the student's field of study may challenge them in ways that they had not previously experienced. When a course is introduced, students have to learn new skills and adapt to newmethods. This may increase their science skills by introducing problem-solving methods that are different from those they have been taught to use before. In this way, they are trained and equipped for tackling difficult challenges in real life situations later on.In conclusion, despite the potential of a narrower focus for a specialised major, mandatory coursework outside of the chosen field of study serves to increase the breadth of knowledge, allow for a more integrated prespective on important academic concepts and to also provide an opportunity for students to challenge themselveswith new experiences. Therefore, each student should mandatory take a variety of diverse courses outside of their declared major. Argument Essay2024年GRE考试的Argument Essay题目如下："According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students. Under that system, teachers reported an average of thirty cases of cheating per year. In the first year that the honor code was in place at Groveton, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey, a majority of Groveton students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without. Thus, all colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's in order to decrease cheating among students."这个Argument Essay写作题目，主要是考察考生对“荣誉制度”对于减少学生作弊的看法和理解。

新GREIssue官方范文整理今天给大家整理新GREIssue 官方范文，快来一起学习吧。

下面我就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

新GREIssue 官方范文整理1Issue test 1As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.Essay Response — Score 6The statement linking technology negatively with free thinking plays on recent human experience over the past century. Surely there has been no time in history where the lived lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on a typical day reveals how technology has revolutionized the world. Most people commute to work in an automobile that runs on an internal combustion engine. During the workday, chancesare high that the employee will interact with a computer that processes information on silicon bridges that are .09 microns wide. Upon leaving home, family members will be reached through wireless networks that utilize satellites orbiting the earth. Each of these common occurrences could have been inconceivable at the turn of the 19th century.The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic changes to a reduction in the ability for humans to think for themselves. The assumption is that an increased reliance on technology negates the need for people to think creatively to solve previous quandaries. Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, computer, or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker would need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and communication. Technology short circuits this thinking by making the problems obsolete.However, this reliance on technology does not necessarily preclude the creativity that marks the human species. The prior examples reveal that technology allows for convenience. The car, computer and phone all release additional time for people to live more efficiently. This efficiency does not preclude the need for humans to think for themselves. In fact, technologyfrees humanity to not only tackle new problems, but may itself create new issues that did not exist without technology. For example, the proliferation of automobiles has introduced a need for fuel conservation on a global scale. With increasing energy demands from emerging markets, global warming becomes a concern inconceivable to the horse-and-buggy generation. Likewise dependence on oil has created nation-states that are not dependent on taxation, allowing ruling parties to oppress minority groups such as women. Solutions to these complex problems require the unfettered imaginations of maverick scientists and politicians.In contrast to the statement, we can even see how technology frees the human imagination. Consider how the digital revolution and the advent of the internet has allowed for an unprecedented exchange of ideas. WebMD, a popular internet portal for medical information, permits patients to self research symptoms for a more informed doctor visit. This exercise opens pathways of thinking that were previously closed off to the medical layman. With increased interdisciplinary interactions, inspiration can arrive from the most surprising corners. Jeffrey Sachs, one of the architects of the UN Millenium Development Goals, based his ideas on emergency caretriage techniques. The unlikely marriage of economics and medicine has healed tense, hyperinflation environments from South America to Eastern Europe.This last example provides the most hope in how technology actually provides hope to the future of humanity. By increasing our reliance on technology, impossible goals can now be achieved. Consider how the late 20th century witnessed the complete elimination of smallpox. This disease had ravaged the human race since prehistorical days, and yet with the technology of vaccines, free thinking humans dared to imagine a world free of smallpox. Using technology, battle plans were drawn out, and smallpox was systematically targeted and eradicated.Technology will always mark the human experience, from the discovery of fire to the implementation of nanotechnology. Given the history of the human race, there will be no limit to the number of problems, both new and old, for us to tackle. There is no need to retreat to a Luddite attitude to new things, but rather embrace a hopeful posture to the possibilities that technology provides for new avenues of human imagination.Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 6The author of this essay stakes out a clear and insightfulposition on the issue and follows the specific instructions by presenting reasons to support that position. The essay cogently argues that technology does not decrease our ability to think for ourselves, but merely provides additional time for people to live more efficiently. In fact, the problems that have developed alongside the growth of technology (pollution, political unrest in oil-producing nations) actually call for more creative thinking, not less.In further examples, the essay shows how technology allows for the linking of ideas that may never have been connected in the past (like medicine and economic models), pushing people to think in new ways. Examples are persuasive and fully developed; reasoning is logically sound and well supported.Ideas in the essay are connected logically, with effective transitions used both between paragraphs (However or In contrast to the statement) and within paragraphs. Sentence structure is varied and complex and the essay clearly demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics), with only minor errors appearing. Thus, this essay meets all the requirements for receiving a top score.新GREIssue 官方范文整理2Essay Response — Score 5Surely many of us have expressed the following sentiment, or some variation on it, during our daily commutes to work: People are getting so stupid these days! Surrounded as we are by striding and strident automatons with cell phones glued to their ears, PDAs gripped in their palms, and omniscient, omnipresent CNN gleaming in their eyeballs, its tempting to believe that technology has isolated and infantilized us, essentally transforming us into dependent, conformist morons best equipped to sideswip one another in our SUVs.Furthermore, hanging around with the younger, pre-commute generation, whom tech-savviness seems to have rendered lethal, is even less reassuring. With Teen People style trends shooting through the air from tiger-striped PDA to zebra-striped PDA, and with the latest starlet gossip zipping from juicy Blackberry to teeny, turbo-charged cell phone, technology seems to support young peoples worst tendencies to follow the crowd. Indeed, they have seemingly evolved into intergalactic conformity police. After all, todays tech-aided teens are, courtesy of authentic, hands-on video games, literally trained to kill; courtesy of chat and instant text messaging, they have their own language; they even have tiny cameras to efficientlyphotodocument your fashion blunders! Is this adolescence, or paparazzi terrorist training camp?With all this evidence, its easy to believe that tech trends and the incorporation of technological wizardry into our everyday lives have served mostly to enforce conformity, promote dependence, heighten comsumerism and materialism, and generally create a culture that values self-absorption and personal entitlement over cooperation and collaboration. However, I argue that we are merely in the inchoate stages of learning to live with technology while still loving one another. After all, even given the examples provided earlier in this essay, it seems clear that technology hasnt impaired our thinking and problem-solving capacities. Certainly it has incapacitated our behavior and manners; certainly our values have taken a severe blow. However, we are inarguably more efficient in our badness these days. Were effective worker bees of ineffectiveness!If T\technology has so increased our senses of self-efficacy that we can become veritable agents of the awful, virtual CEOs of selfishness, certainly it can be beneficial. Harnessed correctly, technology can improve our ability to think and act for ourselves. The first challenge is to figureout how to provide technology users with some direly-needed direction.Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5The language of this essay clearly illustrates both its strengths and weaknesses. The flowery and sometimes uncannily keen descriptions are often used to powerful effect, but at other times this descriptive language results in errors in syntax. See, for example, the problems of parallelism in the second-to-last sentence of paragraph 2 (After all, todays tech-aided teens ...).There is consistent evidence of facility with syntax and complex vocabulary (Surrounded as we are by striding and strident automatons with cell phones glued to their ears, PDAs gripped in their palms, and omniscient, omnipresent CNN gleaming in their eyeballs, its tempting to believe...). However, such lucid prose is often countered by an over-reliance on abstractions and tangential reasoning. For example, what does the fact that video games literally train [teens] to kill have to do with the use or deterioration of thinking abilities?Because this essay takes a complex approach to the issue (arguing, in effect, that technology neither enhances norreduces our ability to think for ourselves, but can do one or the other, depending on the user) and because the author makes use of appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety, a score of 5 is appropriate.新GREIssue 官方范文整理3Essay Response — Score 4In all actuality, I think it is more probable that our bodies will surely deteriorate long before our minds do in any significant amount. Who cant say that technology has made us lazier, but thats the key word, lazy, not stupid. The ever increasing amount of technology that we incorporate into our daily lives makes people think and learn every day, possibly more than ever before. Our abilities to think, learn, philosophize, etc. may even reach limits never dreamed of before by average people. Using technology to solve problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race.If you think about it, using technology to solve more complicating problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning, opening up whole new worlds for many people. Many of these people are glad for the chance to expand their horizons by learning more, going to new places, and trying new things. If it wasnt for the invention of new technologicaldevices, I wouldnt be sitting at this computer trying to philosophize about technology. It would be extremely hard for children in much poorer countries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet. Think what an impact the printing press, a technologically superior mackine at the time, had on the ability of the human race to learn and think.Right now we are seeing a golden age of technology, using it all the time during our every day lives. When we get up theres instant coffee and the microwave and all these great things that help us get ready for our day. But we arent allowing our minds to deteriorate by using them, we are only making things easier for ourselves and saving time for other important things in our days. Going off to school or work in our cars instead of a horse and buggy. Think of the brain power and genius that was used to come up with that single invention that has changed the way we move across this globe.Using technology to solve our continually more complicated problems as a human race is definately a good thing. Our ability to think for ourselves isnt deteriorating, its continuing to grow, moving on to higher though functions and more ingenious ideas. The ability to use what technology we have is an exampleReader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 4This essay meets all the criteria of a level-4 essay. The writer develops a clear position (Using technology to solve our problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race). The position is then developed with relevant reasons (using technology to solve more complicat[ed] problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning and we are seeing a golden age of technology).Point 1, using technology, is supported with the simple but relevant notion that technology allows us access to information and abilities to which we would not normally have access. Similarly, point 2, the golden age, is supported by the basic description of our technologically saturated social condition. Though the overall development and organization of the essay does suffer from an occasional misdirection (see paragraph 3s abrupt progression from coffee pots to the benefits of technology to cars), the essay as a whole flows smoothly and logically from one idea to the next.It is useful to compare this essay to the level-3 essay presented next. Though both essays entail some surface-level discussion and often fail to probe deeply into the issue, this writer does take the analysis a step further. In paragraph 2,the distinction between this essay and the next one (the level-3 response) can most clearly be seen. To support the notion that advances in technology actually help increase thinking ability, the writer draws a clever parallel between the promise of modern, sophisticated technology (computer) and the actual impact of equally promising and pervasive technologies of the past (printing press).Like the analysis, the language in this essay clearly meets the requirements for a score of 4. The writer displays sufficient control of language and the conventions of standard written English. The preponderance of mistakes are of a cosmetic nature (trying to solve more complicating problems.) There is a sentence fragment (Going off ...) along with a comma splice (Our ability ... isnt deteriorating, its continuing to grow ...) in paragraph 3. However, these errors are minor and do not interfere with the clarity of the ideas being presented.新GREIssue 官方范文整理4Essay Response — Score 3There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understandingand achievement. For example, the problem of dibilitating illnesses and diseases such as alzheimers disease is slowing being solved by the technological advancements in stem cell research. The future ability of growing new brain cells and the possibility to reverse the onset of alzheimers is now becoming a reality. This shows our initiative as humans to better our health demonstrates greater ability of humans to think.One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds is the use of internet and cell phones. In the past humans had to seek out information in many different enviroments and aspects of life. Now humans can sit in a chair and type anything into a computer and get an answer. Our reliance on this type of technology can be detrimental if not regulated and regularily substituted for other information sources such as human interactions and hands on learning. I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. Supplementing our knowledge with internet access is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race.Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 3This essay never moves beyond a superficial discussion of the issue. The writer attempts to develop two points: that advancements in technology have progressed our knowledge in many fields and that supplementing rather than relying on technology is surely a way for technology to solve problems while continually advancing the human race. Each point, then, is developed with relevant but insufficient evidence. In discussing the potential of technology to advance knowledge in many fields (a broad subject, rife with possible examples), the writer uses only one limited and very brief example from a specific field (medicine and stem-cell research).Development of the second point is hindered by a lack of specificity and organization. The writer creates what might be best described as an outline. The writer cites a need for regulation/supplementation and warns of the detriment of over-reliance upon technology. However, the explanation of both the problem and solution is vague and limited (Our reliance ... can be detrimental. If humans understand that we should not have such a reliance ... we will advance further). There is neither explanation of consequences nor clarification of what is meant by supplementing. This second paragraph is aseries of generalizations that are loosely connected and lack a much-needed grounding.In the essay, there are some minor language errors and a few more serious flaws (e.g., The future ability of growing new brain cells or One aspect where the ability of humans may initially be seen as an example of deteriorating minds). Despite the accumulation of such flaws, the writers meaning is generally clear. Thus, this essay earns a score of 3.新GREIssue 官方范文整理5Essay Response — Score 2In recent centuries, humans have developed the technology very rapidly, and you may accept some merit of it, and you may see a distortion in society occured by it. To be lazy for human in some meaning is one of the fashion issues in thesedays. There are many symptoms and resons of it. However, I can not agree with the statement that the technology make humans to be reluctant to thinkng thoroughly.Of course, you can see the phenomena of human laziness along with developed technology in some place. However, they would happen in specific condition, not general. What makes human to be laze of thinking is not merely technology, but the the tendency of human that they treat them as a magic stick and ablack box. Not understanding the aims and theory of them couses the disapproval problems.The most important thing to use the thechnology, regardless the new or old, is to comprehend the fundamental idea of them, and to adapt suit tech to tasks in need. Even if you recognize a method as a all-mighty and it is extremely over-spec to your needs, you can not see the result you want. In this procedure, humans have to consider as long as possible to acquire adequate functions. Therefore, humans can not escape from using their brain.In addition, the technology as it is do not vain automatically, the is created by humans. Thus, the more developed tech and the more you want a convenient life, the more you think and emmit your creativity to breakthrough some banal method sarcastically.Consequently, if you are not passive to the new tech, but offensive to it, you would not lose your ability to think deeply. Furthermore, you may improve the ability by adopting it.Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 2The language of this essay is what most clearly links it to the score of 2. Amidst sporadic moments of clarity, this essay is marred by serious errors in grammar, usage andmechanics that often interfere with meaning. It is unclear what the writer means when he/she states, To be lazy for human in some meaning is one of the fashion issues in thesedays, or to adapt suit tech to tasks in need.Despite such severe flaws, the writer has made an obvious attempt to respond to the prompt (I can not agree with the statement that the technology make humans to be reluctant to thinking thoroughly) as well as an unclear attempt to support such an assertion (Not understanding the aims and theory of them [technology] couses the disapproval problems and The most important thing to use the thechnology ... is to comprehend the fundamental idea of them). On the whole, the essay displays a seriously flawed but not fundamentally deficient attempt to develop and support its claims.(Note: In this specific case, the analysis is tied directly to the language. As the language falters, so too does the analysis.)Essay Response — Score 1Humans have invented machines but they have forgot it and have started everything technically so clearly their thinking process is deterioating.Reader Commentary for Essay Response — Score 1The essay is clearly on topic, as evidenced by the writers usage of the more significant terms from the prompt: technically (technologically), humans, thinking (think) and deteriorating (deteriorate). Such usage is the only clear evidence of understanding. Meaning aside, the brevity of the essay (one sentence) clearly indicates the writers inability to develop a response that follows the specific instructions given (Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement above and explain your reasoning for the position you take).The language, too, is clearly level 1, as the sentence fails to achieve coherence. The coherent phrases in this one-sentence response are those tied to the prompt: Humans have invented machines and their thinking process is deteriorating. Otherwise, the point being made is unclear新GREIssue 官方范文整理。

英语考试作文GRE写作Issue部分精品素材分享之自然生存状态想要在GRE作文部分的考试中写出优秀的文章，论据素材是重要的一环。

好的论据不仅能帮助你支撑观点，加强说服力，还能体现出考生在阅读量上的积累和深厚扎实的语言功底基础。

特别是ISSUE作文，更是需要大量好素材作为储备，才能保证考生无论遭遇那种题目，都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的写作。

为大家整理了GRE ISSUE作文各类题目的精品优质素材，一起来看吧。

卢梭观点：自然生存状态Rousseau maintained that human beings were essentially good and equal in the State of Nature, but were corrupted by the introduction of property, agriculture, science, and commerce. People entered into a social contract among themselves, establishing governments and educational systems to correct the inequalities brought about by the rise of civilization.All of the differences in Rousseau‟s theories, when compared to Locke, begin with different interpretations of the State of Nature. Locke believed that most people got along pretty well for the most part by rational intuition, but there were always a few bad apples in the group that forced others to give up their natural rights in a law system in order to be able to punish the exceptions in the society. Rousseau criticizes Locke by saying that he wasn‟t really looking at the real State of Nature and that all of the negative qualities of human beings that he had mentioned to be present in the State of Nature were, in fact, a quality brought on by the state of his time.Rousseau‟s version of the State of Nature differs greatly from Locke‟s, in which he made no mention of the constant fear which would control man‟s life in the state of Nature. Rather, he described the State of Nature as pleasant and peaceful. He described the people in this primitive state as living free, healthy, honest and happy lives, and felt that man was timid, and would always avoid conflict, rather than seek it out. So why a form of social organization? Rousseau asked. He recognized simply, that it would be impossible for man to shake the society and return to a State of Nature.无政府主义观点：自然生存状态Now for the least popular view of all, the anarchist view. It is the most optimistic view of all because it simply states that the State of Nature would be the best state to live in, and that a state would not be necessary. Anarchists view that there are no rotten apples. So far as there are rotten apples in the society, they are the a creation of the government. Anarchists propose that governments are a cause of anti-social behavior, even though they are created in order to remedy it. In the anarchist‟s system, the anti-social person will be abandoned, in a sense left out of the cooperative society. In the anarchist‟s view, people become perfected because they become cooperative and non-aggressive. But if there were bad apples in a state of anarchism, wouldn‟t they become a threat to the society if their anti-social behaviors lead to violence? And it leads to even more questions of insecurity like: without coercion or authority, would people obey the law or does the threat of punishment work to promote more crimes? Would you want to live in a society where there were no punishments for crimes? Maybe public opinion would be enough to keep the society in line. There is always a lot to think about and the arguments go around in circles forever, just because no systemworks out to be perfect because, there are arguments for every gap or flaw in every rule or theory.But anyhow, in the State of Nature, people generally become cooperative, and smart enough to try and keep the peace and order. Sure, people are concerned with their own interests, but they are rational enough to think of ways for reaching their interests without causing conflict with others. After all, keeping peace with people would be a self interest.苏格拉底观点：民主是有缺陷的体系Socrates held highly critical view of the democracy. Socrates believed that democracy was a flawed system, because it left the state in the hands of the unenlightened and it valued all opinions as equal.Socrates believed it was his duty to stand for the law and justice despite the wishes of The Assembly, and this could cost him his life. Socrates stated to obey the laws of the State, only if they are just. It could be said that Socrates ‟s views on democracy and justice is what ultimately led to his death. Socrates believed poor leaders were chosen, simply on their basis of their rhetoric ability, not on their ethics or character.He opposed the efforts of the Sophists to teach their students virtue, knowledge and rhetoric as practical subjects needed by citizens to participate in the institutions of Athenian democracy. Hisbelief on knowledge and virtue was that these required absolute definitions were to be attained through exhaustive philosophical dialogue and debate. He seemed to offend many Athenians with his negative dialectic method, revealing people‟s ignorance and inability to give definitions of truth and virtue. He believed the citizen‟s lack of knowledge made it impossible for the citizens to vote properly for their leaders or for the leaders themselves to even run.。

GRE考试写作范文Issue汇总今天搜集了一些GRE issue 的优秀范文，快来一起学习吧，下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

."Most people recognize the benefits of individuality, but the fact is that personal economic suess requires conformity."Personal economic suess might be due either to one's investment strategy or to one's work or career. With respect to the former, non-conformists with enough risk tolerance and patience invariably achieve more suess than conformists. With respect to the latter, while non-conformists are more likely to sueed in newer industries where markets and technology are in constant flux, conformists are more likely to sueed in traditional service industries ensconced in systems and regulations.Regarding the sort of economic suess that results from investing one's wealth, the principles of investing dictate that those who seek risky investments in areas that are out of favor with the majority of investors ultimately reaphigher returns than those who follow the crowd. It is conformists who invest, along with most other investors, in areas that are currently the most profitable, and popular. However, popular investments tend to be overpriced, and in the long run their values will e down to reasonable levels. As a result, given enough time conformists tend to reap lower rewards from their investments than nonconformists do.Turning to the sort of economic suess that one achieves by way of one's work, neither conformists nor non-conformists necessarily achieve greater suess than the other group.In consumer-driven industries, where innovation, product differentiation and creativity are crucial to lasting suess, non-conformists who take unique approaches tend to recognize emerging trends and to rise above their peers. For example, Ted Turner's departure from the traditional format of the other television works, and the responsiveness of Amazon's Jeff Bezos to burgeoning Inter merce, propelled these two non-conformists into leadership positions in their industries. Particularly in technologyindustries, where there are no conventional practices or ways of thinking to begin with, people who cling to last year's paradigm, or to the status quo in general, are soon left behind by coworkers and peting firms.However, in traditional service industries--such as finance, aounting, insurance, legal services, and health care--personal economic suess es not to non-conformists but rather to those who can work most effectively within the constraints of established practices, policies and regulations. Of course, a clever idea for structuring a deal, or a creative legal maneuver, might play a role in winning smaller battles along the way. But such tactics are those of conformists who are playing by the same ground rules as their peers; winners are just better at the game.In conclusion, non-conformists with sufficient risk tolerance and patience are invariably the most suessful investors in the long run. When it es to careers, however, while non-conformists tend to be more suessful in technology- and consumer-driven industries, traditionalistsare the winners in system-driven industries pervaded by policy, regulation, and bureaucracy."What society has thought to be its greatest social, political, and individual achievements have often resulted in the greatest discontent."I strongly agree that great achievements often lead to great discontent. In fact, I would assert more specifically that great individual achievements can cause discontent for the individual achiever or for the society impacted by the achievement, or both. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that whether a great achievement causes great discontent can depend on one's personal perspective, as well as the perspective of time.With respect to individual achievements, great achievers are by nature ambitious people and therefore tend to be dissatisfied and discontent with their aomplishments-no matter how great. Great athletes are pelled to try tobetter their record-breaking performances; great artists and musicians typically claim that their greatest work willbe their next one--a sign of personal discontent. And many child protégés, especially those who achieve some measure of fame early in life, later suffer psychological discontent for having "peaked" so early. Perhaps the paradigmatic modern example of a great achiever's discontent was Einstein, whose theoretical breakthroughs in physics only raised new theoretical conundrums which Einstein himself recognized and spent the last twenty years of his life struggling unsuessfully to solve.Individual achievements can often result in discontent on a societal level. The great achievement of the individual scientists responsible for the suess of the Manhattan Project resulted in worldwide anxiety over the threat of nuclear annihilation--a form of discontent with which the world's denizens will forever be forced to cope. Even individual achievements that at first glance would appear to have benefited society turn out to be causes of great discontent. Consider the invention of the automobile, along with the innovations in manufacturing processes and materials that made mass production possible. As a result we have bee a society enslaved to our cars, relying on themas crutches not only for transportation but also for affording us a false sense of socioeconomic status. Moreover, the development of assembly-line manufacturing has served to alienate workers from their work, which many psychologists agree causes a great deal of personal discontent.Turning from individual achievements to societal, including political, achievements, the extent to which great achievements have caused great discontent often depends on one's perspective. Consider, for example, America's spirit of Manifest Destiny during the 19th Century, or British Imperialism over the span of several centuries. From the perspective of an Imperialist, conquering other lands and peoples might be viewed as an unqualified suess. However, from the viewpoint of the indigenous peoples who suffer at the hands of Imperialists, these so-called "achievements" are the source of widespread oppression and misery, and in turn discontent, to which any observant Native American or South African native could attest.The extent to which great socio-political achievements have caused great discontent also depends on the perspective of time. For example, F.D.R.'s New Deal was and still is considered by many to be one of the greatest social achievements of the 20th Century. However, we are just now beginning to realize that the social-security system that was an integral part of F.D.R.'s social program will soon result in great discontent among those workers currently paying into the system but unlikely to see any benefits after they retire.To sum up, I agree that great achievements, both individual and socio-political, often result in great discontent. Moreover, great individual achievements can result in discontent for both the individual achiever and the society impacted by the achievement. Nevertheless, in measuring the extent of discontent, we must aount for varying personal and political perspectives as well as different time perspectives."The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority."The speaker asserts that when many people questionauthority society is better off. While I contend that certain forms of disobedience can be harmful to any society, I agree with the speaker otherwise. In fact, I would go further by contending that society's well-being depends on challenges to authority, and that when it es to political and legal authority, these challenges must e from many people.Admittedly, when many people question authority some societal harm might result, even if a social cause is worthy. Mass resistance to authority can escalate toviolent protest and rioting, during which innocent people are hurt and their property damaged and destroyed. The fallout from the 1992 Los Angeles riots aptly illustrates this point. The "authority" which the rioters sought to challenge was that of the legal justice system which acquitted police officers in the beating of Rodney King. The means of challenging that authority amounted toflagrant disregard for criminal law on a mass scale--by way of looting, arson, and even deadly assault. This violentchallenge to authority resulted in a financially crippled munity and, more broadly, a turning back of the clock with respect to racial tensions across America.While violence is rarely justifiable as a means of questioning authority, peaceful challenges to political and legal authority, by many people, are not only justifiable but actually necessary when it es to enhancing and even preserving society's well-being. In particular, progress in human rights depends on popular dissension. It is not enough for a charismatic visionary like Gandhi or King to call for change in the name of justice and humanity; they must have the support of many people in order to effect change. Similarly, in a democracy citizens must respect timeless legal doctrines and principles, yet at the same time question the fairness and relevance of current laws. Otherwise, our laws would not evolve to reflect changing societal values. It is not enough for a handful of legislators to challenge the legal status quo; ultimatelyit is up to the electorate at large to call for change when change is needed for the well-being of society.Questioning authority is also essential for advances in the sciences. Passive aeptance of prevailing principles quells innovation, invention, and discovery, all of which clearly benefit any society. In fact, the very notion of scientific progress is predicated on rigorous scientific inquiry--in other words, questioning of authority. History is replete with scientific discoveries that posed challenges to political, religious, and scientific authority. For example, the theories of a sun-centered solar system, of humankind's evolution from other life forms, and of the relativity of time and space, clearly flew in the face of "authoritative" scientific as well as religious doctrine of their time. Moreover, when it es to science a suessful challenge to authority need not e from a large number of people. The key contributions of a few individuals---like Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Darwin, Einstein, and Hawking---often suffice.Similarly, in the arts, people must challenge established styles and forms rather than imitate them; otherwise, no gemtinely new art would ever emerge, and society would be worse off. And again, it is not necessary that a largenumber of people pose such challenges; a few keyindividuals can have a profound impact. For instance, modern ballet owes much of what is new and exciting to George Ballanchine, who by way of his improvisational techniques posed a suessful challenge to established traditions. And modern architecture arguably owes its existence to the founders of Germany's Bauhaus School of Architecture, which challenged certain "authoritative" notions about the proper objective, and resulting design, of public buildings.To sum up, in general I agree that when many people question authority the well-being of society is enhanced. Indeed, advances in government and law depend on challenges to the status quo by many people. Nevertheless, to ensure a benefit rather than harm, the means of such challenges must be peaceful ones."It is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value."This statement asserts that art, not the art critic, provides something of lasting value to society. I strongly agree with the statement. Although the critic can help us understand and appreciate art, more often than not,critique is either counterproductive to achieving the objective of art or altogether irrelevant to that objective.To support the statement the speaker might point out the three ostensible functions of the art critic. First,critics can help us understand and interpret art; a critic who is familiar with a particular artist and his or her works might have certain insights about those works that the layperson would not. Secondly, a critic's evaluation of an art work serves as a filter, which helps us determine which art is worth our time and attention. For example, a new novel by a best-selling author might nevertheless be an uninspired effort, and if the critic can call our attention to this fact we gain time to seek out more worthwhile literature to read. Thirdly, a critic can provide feedback for artists; and constructive criticism, if taken to heart, can result in better work.However, reflecting on these three functions makes clearthat the art critic actually offers very little to society.The first function is better aomplished by docents and teachers, who are more able to enhance a layperson's appreciation and understanding of art by providing an objective, educated interpretation of it. Besides, true appreciation of art ours at the moment we encounter art; it is the emotional, even visceral impact that art has on our senses, spirits, and souls that is the real value of art. A critic can actually provide a disservice by distracting us from that experience.The critic's second function that of evaluator who filters out bad art from the worthwhile is one that we must be very wary of. History supports this caution. In the role of judge, critics have failed us repeatedly. Consider, for example, Voltaire's rejection of Shakespeare as barbaric because he did not conform to neo-classical principles of unity. Or, consider the plete dismissal of Beethoven'smusic by the esteemed critics of his time. The art critic'sjudgment is limited by the narrow confines of old and established parameters for evaluation. Moreover, critical judgment is often misguided by the ego; thus its value is questionable in any event.I turn finally to the critic's third function: to provide useful feedback to artists. The value of this function is especially suspect. Any artist, or anyone who has studied art, would agree that true art is the product of theartist's authentic passion, a manifestation of the artist's unique creative impulse, and a creation of the artist's spirit. If art were shaped by the concern for integrating feedback from all criticism, it would bee a viable craft, but at the same time would cease to be art.In sum, none of the ostensible functions of the critic are of much value at all, let alone of lasting value, to society. On the other hand, the artist, through works of art, provides an invaluable and unique mirror of theculture of the time during which the work was produced a mirror for the artist's contemporaries and for future generations to gaze into for insight and appreciation ofhistory. The art critic in a subordinate role, more often than not, does a disservice to society by obscuring this mirror.模板,内容仅供参考。

GREAWA范文Issue整合GRE的写作部分对于不少考生来说都挺头痛的，今日我搜集了一些GRE AWA范文,下面我就和大家共享，来观赏一下吧。

GRE AWA范文——IssueGovernment must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive,because it is primarily in cities that a nations cultural traditions are preserved and generated.The speakers claim is actually threeflod:(1)ensuing the survival of large cities and ,in turn,that of cultural traditions ,is a proper function of government;(2) government support is needed for our large dries and cultural traditions to survive and thrive;and (3) cultural traditions are preserved and generated primarily in our large cities.I strongly disagree with all three claims.First of all, subsidizing cultural traditions is not a proper role of government.Admittedly, certain objectives ,such as public health and safety,are so essential to the survival of large dries and of nations that government has a duty to ensure that they are met.However,these objectives should not extend tenuously to preserving cultural traditions.Moreover,government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as cultural patron.Inadequate resources call for restrictions,priorities,and choices.It is unconscionable to relegatenomative decisions as to which cities or cultural traditions are more deserving,valuable,or needy to a few legislators, whose notions about culture might be misguided or unrepresentive of those of the general populace.Also,legislators are all too likely to make choices in favor of the cultural agendas of their home towns and states,or of lobbyists with the most money and influence.Secondly,subsidizing cultural traditions is not a necessary role of government.A lack of private funding might justify an exception.However,cultural-by which i chiefly mean the fine arts-has always depended primarily on the patronage of private individuals and businesses, and not on the government . The Medics ,a powerful banking family of Renaissance iltaly,supported artists Michelangelo and Raphael,During the 20th Century the primarily source of cultural support were private foundations established by industrial magnates Carnegie, Mellon,Rockefeller and Getty.And tomorrow cultural support will come from our new technology and media moguls-including the likes of Ted Turner and Bill Gates, In short,philanthropy is alive and well today,and so government need not intervene to ensure that our cultural traditions are preserved and promoted.Finally,and perhaps most importantly ,the speaker unfairly suggests that large cities serve as the primarily breeding ground and sanctuaries for a nations cultual traditions.Today a nations distinct culturaltradition-its folk art,crafts,traditional songs,customs and ceremonies-burgon instead in small towns and rural regions.Admittedly, our cities do serve as our centers for high art; big cities are where we deposit,display,and boast the worlds preeminent art ,architecture,and music,But big-city culture has little to do any-more with one nations distinct cultural traditions.After all,modern cities are essentially mutilcultural stew pots; accordingly, by assisting large cities a government is actually helping to create a gobal culture as well to subsidize the traditions of other nations cultures.In the final analysis,government cannot phiosophically justify assisting large cities for the purpose of either promoting or preserving the nations cultural traditions; nor is government assistance necessary toward these ends.Moreover ,assisting large cities would have little bearing on our distinct cultural traditions ,which abide elsewhere.GRE AWA 范文——IssueAll nations should help support the development of a global university to engage students in the process of solving the worlds most persistent social problems.I agree that it would serve the interest of all nations to establish a global university for the purpose of solving the worlds most persistent social problems.Nevertheless ,such a university poses certain risks which all participating nations must be careful to minimize -or risk defeatingthe universitys purpose.One compelling argument in favor of a golbal university has to do with fact that its faculty and students would bring diverse cultural and educational perspectives to the problems they seek to solve.It seems to me that nations can only benefit from a global university where sutdents learn ways in which other nations address certain soda problems-successfully or not. It might be tempting to think that an overly diversified academic community would impede communication among students and faculty. However,in my view any such concerns are unwarranted,especially considering the growing awareness of other peoples and cultures which the mass media,and especially the internet, have created .Moreover,many basic principle used to solve enduring social problems know no national boundaries;thus a useful insight or discovery can come from a researcher or student from any nation.Another compelling argument for a global university involves the increasingly global nature of certain problems.Consider,for instance, the depletion of atmospheric ozone,which has wanned the Earth to the point that it threatens the very survival of the human species.Also ,we are now learning that dear-cutting the worlds rainforests can set into motion a chain of animal extinction that threatens the delicate balance upon which all animas-including humans -depend .Also consider that a financial crisis-or a political crisis or natural disaster in one country canspell trouble for foreign companies,many of which are now multination in that they rely on the labor forces,equpment,and raw material of other nations.Environmental,economic,and political problems such as these all carry grave social consequences-increased crime,unemployment,insurrection,hunger,and so forth.Solving these problems requires global cooperation-which a global university can faciliate.Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons why a global university would help solve many of our most pressing social problems,the establishment of such a university poses certain problems of its own which must be addressed in order that the university can achieve its objectives.First, participant nations would need to overcome a myriad of administrative and political impediments .All nations would need to agree on which problems demand the universitys attention and resources,which areas of academic research are worthwhile,as well as agreeing on policies and procedures for making ,enforcing ,and amending these decisions. Query whether a functional global university is politically feasible,given that sovereign nations naturally wish to advance their own agendas.A second problems inherent in establishing a global university involes the risk that certain intellectual and research avenues would become officially sanctioned while others of equal or greater potentialvalue would be discouraged ,or perhaps even proscribed .A telling example of the inherent danger of setting and enforcing official research priorities involves the Soviet governments attempts during the 1920s to not only control the direction and the goals of its scientists research but also to distort the outcome of that research -ostensibly for the greatest good of the greatest number of people.Not surprisely,during this time period no significant scientific advances accurred under the auspices of the Soviet government.The Soviet lesson provides an important caveat to administrators of a global university; Significant progress in solving pressing social problems requires an open mind to all sound ideas,approaches,and theories-krespecitve of the ideologies of their propoents.A final problems with a global university is that the worlds preeminent intellectual talent might be drawn to the sorts of problems to which the university is charged with solving,while parochial social problem go unsolved.While this is not reason enough not to establish a global university,it nevertheless is a concern that university administrators and participant nations must be aware of in allocating resources and intellectual talent.To sum up,given the increasingly global nature or the worlds social problems,and the escalating costs of addressing these problems, a global university makes good sense.And , since all nations would have acommon interest in seeing this endeavor succeed,my intuition is that participating nations would be able to overcome whatever procedual and political obstacles that might stand in the way of success .As long as each nation is careful not to neglect its own unique social problems,and as long as the universitys administartors are careful to remain open-mind about the legitimacy and potential value of various avenues of intellectual inquury and research ,a global university might go along way toward solving many of the worlds pressing social problems.GRE AWA 范文——IssueMany of the worlds lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them.The government of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct.The speaker asserts that government of countries where lesser-known languages are spoken should intervene to prevent these languages from becoming extinct.I agree in so far as a countrys indigenous and distinct languages should not be abandoned and forgot ten altogether.At some point ,however ,i think cultural identity should yield to the more practical considerations of day-to-day life in a global society.On the one hand,the indigenous language of any geographical region is part-and-parcel of the cultural heritage of the regions natives.Inmy observation we humans have a basic psychological need for individual identity,which we define by way of our memebership in distinct cultural groups.A culture defines itself in various ways-by its unique traditions ,rituals ,mores attitudes and beliefs ,but especially language.Therefore, when a peoples language becomes extinct the result is a diminished sense of pride ,dignity ,and self-worth.One need look no further than continental Europe to observe how people cling tenaciously to their distinct languages,despire the fact that there is no practical need for them anymore. And on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, the French Canadians stubbornly insist on French as their official language,for the sole purpose of preserbing their distinct cultural heritage.Even where no distinct language exists,peolple will invent one to gain a sense of cultural identity ,as the emergence of the distinct Ebonic cant among todays Afircan American aptly illustrates .In short.people resist language assimilation because of a basic human need to be part of a distinct cultural group.Another important reason to prevent the extinction of a language is to preserve the distinct ideas that only that particular language can convey.Certain Naive American an Oriental language,for instance,contain words symbolizing spiritual and other abstract concepts that only these cultures embrace.Thus,in some cases to lose a language would be to abandon cherished beliefs and ideas that can be conveyed only throughtlanguage.On the other hand,in todays high-tech world of satellite communications.global mobility,and especially the Internet,language,language barriers serve primarily to impede cross-cultural communication,which in turn impedes international commerce and nguage barriers naturally breed misunderstanding,a certain distrust and ,as a result,discord and even war among nations.Moreover,in my view the extinction of all but a few major language is inexorable-as supported by the fact that the Internet has adopted English as its official language.Thus by intervening to preserve a dying language a government might be deploying its resources to fight a losing battle,rather than to combat more pressing social problems-such as hunger ,homelessness,disease and ignorance-that plague nearly every society today.In sum, preserving indigenous language is ,admittedly ,a worthy goal;maintaining its own distinct language affords a people a sense of pride,dignity and self-worth.Moreover,by preserving languages we honor a peoples heritage,enhance our understanding of history,and preserve certain ideas that only some languages properly convey.Nevertheless,the economic and political drawbacks of languages barriers outweigh the benefits of preserving a dying language.In the final analysis,government should devote its time and resources elsewhere,and leave it to thepeople themselves to take whatever steps are needed to preserve their own dinstinct languagesGRE AWA 范文——IssueAlthough many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, they in fact,prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Do modern luxuries serve to undermine our true strenghth and indepedence as individuals? The speaker believes so ,and i tend to agree.Consider the automobile,for example .Most people consider the automobile a necessarity rather than a luxury;yet it is for this very reason that the automobile so aptly supports the speakers point.To the extent that we depend on cars as crutches,they prevent us from becoming truly independent and strong in character as individuals.Consider first the effect of the automobile on our independence as individuals.In some respects the automobiles serves to enhances such independence .For example,cars make it possible for people in isolated and depressed areas without public transportation to become more independent by pursing gainful employment outside their communities.And teenagers discover that owning a car,or even borrowing one on occasion,affords them a needed sense of independence from their parents.However,cars have diminished our independence in a number ofmore significant respects.Weve grown dependent on our cars for commuting to work .We rely on them like crutches for short trips to the corner store, and for carting our children to and from school.Moreover,the car has become a means not only to our assorted physical destinations but also to the attainment of our socioeconomic golas,insofar as the automobile has becoming a symbol of status.In fact ,in my observation many,if not most, working professionals willingly undermine their financial security for the sake of being seen driving this years new SUV might afford a person a feeling and appearance of strength ,or machismo.But this feeling has nothing to do with a persons true character.In contrast,there is a certain strength of character that comes with eschewing modern conviences such as cars,and with the knowledge that one is contributing to a cleaner and quieter environment,a safer neighborhood,and arguably a more genteel society.Also ,alternative modes of transportation such as bicycling and walking are forms of exercise which require and promote the virtue of self-discipline.Finally ,in my observation people who have forsaken the automobile spend more time at home,where they are more inclined to prepare and even grow their own food ,and to spend more time with their families.The former enhances ones independence; the latter enhances the integrity of ones values and the strength of ones family.In sum up ,the automobile helps illustrate that when a luxury becomes a necessity it can sap our independence and strength as individuals.Perhaps our society is better off , on balance,with such luxuries; after all, the automobile industry has created countless jobs,raised our standard of living ,and made the world more interesting .However ,by becoming slaves to the automobile we trade off a certain independence and inner strength.GRE AWA范文Issue。

gre作文issue【篇一：gre考试issue写作范文详解】gre考试issue写作范文详解(1~19)(1):issue the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.观点陈述型作文/[题目]被置于媒体审视下的任何人，其名誉终将受毁损。

sample essaythe intensity of todays media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject hasturned even minor media events into so-called media frenzies. reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pryever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. with this type of media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected toit will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. everyone makes mistakes. the advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. technology has also made it easier to dig furtherthan ever before into a persons past, increasing the possibility that the subjects reputation may be harmed.[范文正文]当今媒体报道的力度，由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未有的数量和种类，从而被极大地增强。

新GREIssue官方范文整理汇总为了让大家更好的备考新GREIssue ，给大家整理了新GREIssue官方范文，快来一起学习吧。

下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

新GREIssue 官方范文整理1Issue test 2“The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership ingovernment, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree ordisagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure toaddress the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challengeyour position.Essay Response – Score 6Whenever people argue that history is a worthless subject or that there isnothing to be gained by just “memorizing a bunch of stupid names and dates,” Isimply hold my tongue and smile to myself. What I’m thinking is that, asclicheas it sounds, you do learn a great deal from history (and woe to those who failto learn those lessons). It is remarkable to think of the number of circumstances and situations in which even the most rudimentary knowledge ofhistory will turn out to be invaluable. Take, for example, the issue at hand here. Is it better for society to instill in future leaders a sense of competition or cooperation? Those who have not examined leaders throughout timeand across a number of fields might not have the ability to provide a thoroughand convincing answer to this question, in spite of the fact that it is crucialto the future functioning of our society. Looking closely at the question of leadership and how it has worked in the past, I would have to agree that thebest way to prepare young people for leadership roles is to instill in them asense of cooperation.Let us look first at those leaders who have defined themselves based ontheir competitiveness. Although at first glance it may appear that a leader musthave a competitive edge in order to gain and then maintain a leadership position, I will make two points on this subject. First, the desire to competeis an inherent part of human nature; that is, it is not something that needs tobe “instilled” in young people. Is there anyone who does not compete in some wayor another every single day? You try to do better than others in your schoolwork or at the office, or you just try to do better than yourself in some way,to push yourself. When societies instill competitiveness in their leaders, it only leads to trouble. The most blatant example in this case is Adolf Hitler,who took competition to the very extreme, trying to prove that his race and hiscountry were superior to all. We do not, however, need to look that far to fi ndless extreme examples (i.e., Hitler is not the extreme example that disprovesthe rule). The recent economic meltdown was caused in no large part by theleaders of American banks and financial institutions who were obsessed withcompeting for the almighty dollar. Tiger Woods, the ultimate competitor inrecent golfing history and in many ways a leader who brought the sport of golfto an entirely new level, destroyed his personal life (and perhaps his career--still yet to be determined) by his overreaching sense that he could accomplish anything, whether winning majors or sleeping with as many women aspossible. His history of competitiveness is well documented; his father pushedhim froma very early age to be the ultimate competitor. It served him well insome respects, but it also proved to be detrimental and ultimately quite destructive.Leaders who value cooperation, on the other ahnd, have historically beenless prone to these overreaching, destructive tendencies. A good case in pointwould be Abraham Lincoln. Now, I am sure at this point you are thinking thatLincoln, who served as President during the Civil War and who refused to compromise with the South or allow secession, could not possibly be my model ofcooperation! Think, however, of the way Lincoln structured his Cabinet. He didnot want a group of “yes men” who would agree with every word he said, butinstead he picked people who were more likely to disagree with his ideas. And herespected their input, which allowed him to keep the government together in theNorth during a very tumultuous period (to say the least). My point in choosingthe Lincoln example is that competitiveness and conflict may play better to themasses and be more likely to be recorded in the history books, but it was hiscooperative nature that allowed him to govern effectively. Imagine if 109the CEOof a large company were never able to compromise and insisted thatevery singlething be done in exactly her way. Very quickly she would lose the very peoplethat a company needs in order to survive, people with new ideas, people ready tomake great advances. Without the ability to work constructively with those whohave conflicting ideas, a leader will never be able to strike deals, reach consensus, or keep an enterprise on track. Even if you are the biggest fish inthe pond, it is difficult to force your will on others forever; eventually a bigger fish comes along (or the smaller finish team up against you!).In the end, it seems most critical for society to instill in young people asense of cooperation. In part this is true because we seem to come by our competitive side more naturally, but cooperation is more often something westruggle to learn (just think of kids on the playground). And although competitive victory is more showy, more often than not the real details of leadership come down to the ability to work with other people, to compromise andcooperate. Getting to be President of the United States or the managingdirectorof a corporation might require you to win some battles, but once you are thereyou will need diplomacy and people-skills. Those can be difficult to learn, butif you do not have them, you are likely to be a short-lived leader.Reader Commentary for Essay Response – Score 6This outstanding response earns a score of 6 for presenting an insightfulposition on the issue and supporting its analysis with compelling reasons andpersuasive examples. The response takes the insight-ful position that competition, though necessary to some aspects of leadership, is less importantfor young people to learn because it is inherent in the human condition and canlead to dangerous excesses, where-as cooperation is more difficult to learn butmore essential. The response follows the task directions by using counterarguments in the development of its position. For example, the discussionof Lincoln explore s conflicting sides of his Presidency (the “competition”ofthe Civil War and the “cooperation” within his Cabinet). In fact, the responseskillfully explores the nuances of both cooperation and competition, buildingits position of agreement with the prompt by looking closely at many sides ofboth concepts. Additionally, the response demonstrates superior facility withlanguage. There are a few minor errors, mainly typos, but in general the response demonstrates excel-lent sentence variety and diction. This sentence istypical of the quality of the writing throughout the response: “My point in choosing the Lincoln example is that competitiveness and conflict may playbetter to the masses and be more likely to be recorded in the history books, butit was his cooperative nature that allowed him to govern effectively.” In thiscomplex sentence, the writer makes skillful use of parallel structure and subordination. Because of its fluent writing and insightful development, then,this response earns a score of 6.新GREIssue 官方范文整理2Essay Response – Score 5Cooperation, the act of working as a group to achieve a collective goal, isan important value for young children to learn. Another vital life lesson children can learn is how to be competitive, which is a mindset in which a person feels the need to accomplish more than another person. Both are necessaryto become well rounded individuals, but concerning preparing for a future ingovernment, industry or various other fields, a sense of cooperation is muchmore important. While not all children are overly competitive in nature, everyperson has some level of competitive drive inside them. This is a natural thingand is perfectly normal. Unfortunately, if this competitive nature is emphasized, the child will have problems relating socially to other children,and subsequently, will have issues interacting with adults later in life. A fierce competitive drive will blind an individual, causing them to not seesituations where group effort will be more greatly rewarded than an individualeffort. Take for instance the many teams of people working for NASA. If thepeople that make up these teams were all out to prove that they were superior toothers, our entire space program would be jeapordized. One needs to look beyondthe scope of what is best on an individual level and learn to look at what willmost benefit a broad group of people. This is where instilling a sense of cooperation in young children is vital. Cooperation is taught at an early ageand must be emphasized throughout life to fully embrace the concept.In the world of sports a competitive drive is vital; unfortunately, life isnot a sports game that simply leads to a winning or losing score. Life is farmore complex than this simple idea and there is no winner or loser designationto accompany it. We all have to work together to come to a conclusion that willassist 110not just ourselves, but others and future generations. In every scenario there will be individuals that have brilliant ideas, but those ideas require other people to build upon, perfect and impliment. Take for instanceBill Gates; Bill Gates is responsible for the Microsoft coorporation which heinvented in his garage. His competitive drive assisted in building his idea, butit was the collaborative effort of many people that helped propel his inventioninto the world known product it is today. Without the cooperation of others, hisgenius invention might never have made it out of his garage. It may be true thatan individual can change the world, but only so far as to say that an individualcan construct an idea that will inevitably change the world. Once an idea isformulated, it then takes a team of people working collectively towards a commongoal to make sure that the brillant, life-altering idea makes it to furtuition. Without the cooperation of many, an idea could simply remain as apicture on adrawing board. It is because of this possibility that instilling a cooperative demeanor in children is much more important than developing a competivieattitude. Competition is a natural thing that will develop with or without encouragement but the same cannot be said for a sense of cooperation.Reader Commentary for Essay Response – Score 5Arguing that cooperation is less natural and more important for leadership,this response develops a thoughtful position on the issue and conveys meaningclearly and well. For these reasons it earns a score of 5. Note that it does notdevelop its reasons and examples as thoroughly as the sample 6 does, but itstill presents thoughtful analysis using well chosen examples. For example, thediscussion of Bill Gates is thoughtful, exploring the ways that both competition(the “competitive drive” that led him to found a company) and cooperation (the“collaborative effort of many people” is what made the company work)wereessential to his success as a leader. Throughout the response, then, counterarguments are used to create a nuanced position on the issue. The writerlooks at conflicting aspects of competition, which is vital but insufficient forlife because life is “more complex” than a sporting event, and cooperation,which is critical but more difficult to learn. In addition, the writer conveysmeaning clearly, demonstrating sentence variety and a facility with languagethat is more than adequate. There are a few minor errors, mainly typos andmisspelled words, but language control in this response is more than adequate(e.g., “One needs to look beyond the scope of what is best on an individuallevel and learn to look at what will most benefit a broad group of people.”).Because of its facility with language and its thoughtful position on the issue,this response earns a score of 5.新GREIssue 官方范文整理3Essay Response – Score 4When the generation of today matures, it is important for them to succeedand become the successful leaders in government, industry and other fields.There are many traits that leaders must possess, and cooperation is one of thesevery important characters. Nonetheless it is important for leaders to have asense of competition, so as to prevent themselves from be-ing complacent withtheir position.Cooperation is needed in order to be a functional person in society, whilestill adhering to social standards. Most leaders in society, did not start out as such. A person cannot isolate themselves from others with demeanor andattitude and expect to become an executive. While there may be leaders that havedeveloped this ill attitude towards others, they did not get there by beingthatway. A person who is able to effectively cooperate with others, will subsequently develop a nexus of supporters. Through collaboration, people areable to develop their studies further and better themselves. However, it is still important for there to be a sense of competition. Competition is the rootof motivation for most. It drives us to become stronger, smarter, and to wantmore. Nonetheless, the spirit of competition must also be reigned in, and not beallowed to run wild. Competitiveness can lead to abuse of power and distastefulactions, which is quite the opposite of someone who displays cooperativeness.Some may argue that competition is not needed. That those that are meant tobe leaders will not become complacent, because they have their own internaldrive to lead. If there was no competition, there would be no world records.Michael Phelps may not be a leader of government or industry, but he iscertainly educated on the technique of swimming, and leader in his field. Wouldhe be as good as he is today if there was not competition? Would the leaders ofMicrosoft have been motivated to create Bing if there was no Google? 111Cooperation helped many leaders get where they are today, and will continueto do so in the future. But leaders, as well as those that aspire to be one, allneed to have a sense of competition as well.Reader Commentary for Essay Response – Score 4This adequate response presents a clear position on the issue in accordancewith the assigned task, arguing that both competition and cooperation are important for leaders. The response uses counterarguments both in the construction of its overall position (comparing the value of both competitionand cooperation) and in its discussion of the positive and negative aspects ofcompetition. However, the development of ideas in this response is not as thorough or as persuasive as one would expect to see in a response that earns ascore of 5 or 6. For instance, the example of Microsoft inventing Bing to compete with Google is certainly relevant, but it is not developed with anythoughtfulness. It is simply stated. Other examples are somewhat more fullydeveloped, but there is also some tangential material (e.g., even the writer seems to understand that Michael Phelps does not quite fit into a discussion ofleadership). In addition to its adequate development, this response displaysadequate control of language. This response does not have the sentence varietyor the skillful diction seen in a response that earns a higher score. There aresome minor errors present, but nothing that interferes with clarity. Becausethis response presents a clear position on the issue, expressing meaning withadequate clarity, it earns a score of 4.新GREIssue 官方范文整理4Essay Response – Score 3Leadership is a tough task to master.To be a leader means you mustbebetter than a bunch of folks and work with them to accomplise a greater goal.Leadership in any feild needs cooperarive effort and a leader must be ableto inspire and make the human resourse at hand to work better.In doing so thereis a far cry of an immense responsibility.I therefore stand by taking help frominmates to do the same.Like the say ‘when going gets tough the tough gets going’.So there is nopoint of getting bogged down rather plan more ways to get the work done and oneof the sureshot approach is by working together.I believe to the core of myheart that there can be nothing equal to cooperation and unity in a work field.As simple as it sounds if one can do a work in hermit atmosphere at certain efficiency, a number of brains working toghether can be more effi cient.An atmosphere where everyone works holding hands and when someone fallsthere are people to make him stand again makes a much better picture in my mindeverytime.Compitition is not a evil it can inspire some one to work better and looking to do better can be considered good.But am afraid what fear here is thatwhen you compete with someone you set you limits to that person.So once you dobetter than him/her you tend to be relaxed and that is where when the real evilcreeps in.With cooperation you have a goal and associated effort to work for thesame.Rather than individual petty and competition to be better placed than anfriend it would be far more appreciable to keep working for the common goal.Thatway even the goal gets more defined at some level.So lets all drop all this boundaries of indivisualism and keep working for a common goal,and if you wantto compete then compete with yourself and get better than what you were yesterday.Reader Commentary for Essay Response – Score 3This response displays some competence in presenting a positionaccordingto the task directions, but it earns a score of 3 because frequent minor errorsdo interfere with clarity. The writer agrees with the prompt that cooperation ismore important, and it explores some counterarguments in its assertion thatcompe tition “can inspire some one to work better and looking to do better can beconsidered good.” How-ever, almost every sentence in this response has at leastone minor error. Some of the errors are typos or minor mechanical problems likemissing spaces after punctuation. But other errors have more impact on meaning.Missing words, incorrect sentence boundaries, and improper verb forms contributeto a lack of clarity throughout the response. This sentence is typical of the limited language control seen t hroughout this response: “So there is no point ofgetting bogged down rather plan more ways to get the work done and one of thesureshot approach is by working together.” Because of its limited clarity, then,this response earns a score of 3.新GREIssue 官方范文整理5Essay Response – Score 2Both a sense of cooperation and competition is needed to be a good leader.If one is focused on competition and ignores or refuse to work with others thenthere would be problems for that leader. A 112leader needs to be able to getalong, cooperate and know how to interact with others and allies. Treaties andallies require cooperation. Trade agreements and aid as well. A leader cannotachieve much alone. Competition is also needed to encourage people to be thebest. If no one does there best to obtain a goal how would a leader be chosen.What kind of leader would that make? The best way for a society to prepare itsyoung is to instill a sense of both competition and cooperation.Reader Commentary for Essay Response – Score 2This response earns a score of 2 for its seriously limited development.There is a clear position on the issue, as the writer argues that the “best wayfor a society to prepare its young is to instill a sense of both competition andcooperation.” However, the writer provides few, if any, relevant reasons orexamples to support and develop this position. The discussion of cooperation issupported only by very generic assertions like the notion that “treaties andallies require cooperation.” And there is even less development in the discussion of competition. In order to receive a higher score, the response would need to provide more support for its position. Language control in thisresponse is adequate, but the response earns a score of 2 because of its seriously limited development.Essay Response – Score 1Best way for a socity to prepare it’s young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense ofcoopertion, not competition. This statement is very true, whether we meanleadership in government, industry, or any other fields. For leadership in government, industry, or other fields some people argue that the best way forsociety to prepare it’s young people is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation. Other people argue that the best way is through competition. It canbe diffi cult for many people to decide between these two choices. There aremany arguments that support both sides. I fully agree that the best way is toinstilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Reader Commentary for Essay Response – Score 1This response earns a score of 1 because it demonstrates little evidence ofthe ability to develop a position on the issue. Instead of developing a position, the response simply repeats the language of the prompt, adding somegeneric language that could be applied to any Issue prompt. For example, consider these sentences: “It can be difficult for many people to decide betweenthese two choices. There are many arguments that support both sides.” This is atotally generic analytical framework that has not been filled in with any specifi c exploration related to this prompt. The writer is clearly making anattempt to respond to the prompt, and the final sentence does seem to indicate aposition on the issue. So the response does not merit a score of 0. However, thevast majority of the response is simply repetition of language from the promptand/or generic material. Thus, it earns a score of 1.新GREIssue官方范文整理汇总。