北欧家具设计
- 格式:pptx
- 大小:4.57 MB
- 文档页数:1
浅谈北欧风格家居设计的发展之路北欧风格家居设计源自北欧国家,一直以来以其简约、舒适、自然的特点备受世界各地消费者的青睐。
随着全球化的发展和人们对舒适家居生活的追求,北欧风格家居设计在世界范围内越来越受到关注和喜爱。
本文将从北欧风格家居设计的起源、发展历程和特点等方面,来浅谈北欧风格家居设计的发展之路。
一、北欧风格家居设计的起源北欧风格家居设计起源于北欧国家,包括丹麦、瑞典、挪威、芬兰和冰岛等国家。
这些国家地处寒带,气候寒冷,长期处于低温多雨的气候环境中,因此北欧地区的居民在设计家居时更加注重舒适性和实用性。
受地理环境的影响,北欧地区的家居设计充满了朴素、自然和简约的特点。
比如丹麦的家具设计追求简洁、实用,瑞典的家居设计善于利用光线和空间,挪威的家居设计注重与自然的融合,芬兰的设计追求木质材料的运用等等。
这些共同的特点构成了北欧风格家居设计的基本特征。
北欧风格家居设计在20世纪上半叶开始逐渐走向世界。
以丹麦为例,20世纪初,丹麦的家具制造业就迅速崛起,其设计师们一直试图打破传统的家具设计,推崇简约、实用和美观的风格。
随着工艺技术的不断改进和时代的变迁,北欧风格家居设计逐渐深入人心,并在国际上崭露头角。
20世纪50年代,北欧风格家居设计开始迅速走向世界舞台。
瑞典家居品牌宜家(IKEA)成立,以其简约、实用的家居设计风格受到全球消费者的追捧。
宜家的成功也为北欧风格家居设计的国际化奠定了基础。
到了21世纪,随着全球经济一体化的不断深入,北欧风格家居设计在世界范围内得到了更加广泛的推广和发展。
不仅在家居产品上,北欧风格的设计理念也渗透到了建筑、室内装饰、家居用品等方方面面,成为世界范围内备受瞩目的设计风格之一。
1. 简约:北欧风格的家居设计追求简单、纯粹的美感,摒弃了过多的修饰和装饰。
家具和装饰品通常以直线、曲线和简单的图案为主,营造出简约而不失优雅的氛围。
2. 实用:北欧人民注重实用性,他们的家居设计体现了极高的功能性和实用性。
丹麦设计大师潘顿(Verner Panton)Verner Panton(1926~1998)潘顿是丹麦著名工业设计师,1947-1951在丹麦皇家艺术学院学习,曾在雅各布森(Arne Jacobsen)的事务所工作过,后定居瑞士巴塞尔。
他打破北欧传统工艺的束缚,运用鲜艳的色彩和崭新的素材,开发出充满想象力的家俱和灯饰。
从50年代末起,他就开始了对玻璃纤维增强塑料和化纤等新材料的试验研究。
60年代,他与美国米勒公司合作进行整体成型玻璃纤维增强塑料椅的研制工作,于1968年定型。
这种椅可一次模压成型,具有强烈的雕塑感,色彩也十分艳丽,至今仍享有盛誉,被世界许多博物馆收藏。
潘顿还长于利用新材料来设计灯具,如1970年设计的潘特拉灯具,1975年用有机玻璃设计的VP球形吊灯。
同时,他还是一位色彩大师,他发展的所谓平行色彩理论,即通过几何图案,将色谱中相互靠近的颜色融为一体,为他创造性地利用新材料中丰富的色彩打下了基础。
Verner Panton于1967年设计的Panton Chair,简洁利落的线条,一体成型、造型完美,让人眼睛为之一亮,至今仍深受人们的青睐,常可看到它的身影被运用在不同的空间。
芬兰设计大师:艾洛·阿尼奥(Eero Aarnio)Eero AarnioEero Aarnio 1932 年生于芬兰,于1954 年至1957 年求学赫尔辛基的Institute of Industrial Arts,并在1962 年成立个人工作室,从事室内设计与工业设计。
他的许多作品享誉全球的国际知名度,并获得许多工业设计奖项。
例如,他在1963 年设计了著名的Ball Chair,这是张以玻璃纤维制成的球形椅子;很快地这张椅子被大量地制造生产。
而玻璃纤维,成为Aarnio 设计时最喜欢使用的素材。
其它代表作品还包括有糖果椅(Pastil Chair)、蕃茄椅(Tomoto Chair)和极富未来感的泡泡椅(Bubble Chair),是波普风格爱好者不可不知的设计大师之一。
58随着经济全球化的发展,各国之间的往来日益频繁,这不仅体现在经济发展上,还体现在世界各地的民族文化、历史文化等方面的交流上。
和谐统一已成为世界发展的主旋律,“只有民族的才有可能成为世界的”这个理念逐渐渗透到各行各业。
对于家具设计来说,只有具有本民族的文化特色,才能在日益发展变化的国际舞台上站稳脚跟,换句话说,家具设计应体现“和而不同”的思想。
我国传统家具在世界家具体系中享有盛誉,尤其是明式家具,是中华民族传统文化中的一朵奇葩。
但是,我国现代家具设计的发展还远落后于一些发达国家,对现代中式家具设计理论的研究还存在很多不足。
这不仅需要家具设计者挖掘本民族的文化精髓,还要借鉴其他国家的优秀设计经验,以弥补我们在家具设计中的空缺和不足。
一、现代中式家具设计现状分析中国现代家具设计思想存在于中国社会文化、经济文化、审美文化等各种文化体系中。
传统文化对现在和将来文化发展的影响永远不会停止,因此,传统家具对现代家具设计的影响是持久的。
在看待传统与现代的设计思想上,究竟是对传统充分肯定还是有选择地继承和发扬,已经成为业内人士广泛讨论的焦点。
意大利设计师Ettore Sottsass认为:“保护传统并非是单纯地重复传统”。
对设计文化的思考不应该是简单地进行一场文艺复兴运动,而应该是重新认识本民族的思想文化,重新认识人与自然之间的关系。
所以,对传统家具,我们应该认真研究,在取其精华去其糟粕的基础上进行创新设计[1]。
现代中式家具与北欧现代家具设计的对比分析文/刘宏利 朱毅“现代中式家具”这个名词在家具业里众所周知,但是,目前对现代中式家具设计的探索式理论研究和设计实践还未达到一个令人满意的程度,“拷贝”、“抄袭”现象仍普遍存在。
大多数专家学者一致认为,大力发展有中国特色的原创家具设计是我国家具业近期的主要任务之一。
真正有生命力的家具设计必然建立在民族传统文化的基础之上,“只有民族的才有可能成为世界的”[2]。
现代中式家具,应该以我国优秀传统家具设计为蓝本,巧妙地将中华民族的传统文化与时代发展的潮流相结合,并与现代人们的居住环境、生活习惯、工作方式等因素相协调。
22个你要知道的北欧设计品牌(上)1、ALVAR AALTO早于三十年代出道的芬兰建筑家具设计大师,其ERGONOMIC及ORGANIIC风格的设计已成招牌经典,更为北欧设计奠定了不可忽视的地位。
2、ABSOLUT似是风马牛不相及,这个来自瑞典的伏特加酒厂却是标志北欧创意的重要例子,其多年一直沿用的酒瓶设计与艺术或设计师挂勾的广告策略收效极广,著名的普普艺术家安地毕荷替其设计的酒类广告便是最佳例子。
3、ARABIA1877年于芬兰创立,成RORSTRAND瓷器制造商的分支,发展下来却成为芬兰最大的家居陶瓷品牌。
风格崇尚简朴无华的设计,现已为HACKMAN王国的品牌之一。
4、BANG & OLUFSEN1925年由PETER BANG和SVEND OLUFSEN创办的丹麦电器品牌,经过七十五年已成简单而昂贵的电器象征。
B&O的世界性市场成就实在为北欧设计奠下强壮的基础。
5、DAVID DESIGN1988年由DAVID CARLSON创办的的瑞典家居品牌,象征北欧新一代设计师如何看待新兴家居家具的设计的需要,风格平实容易消化,似是IKEA豪华一点的版本。
6、ERICSSON来自瑞典的电话先锋,1876年由LARS MAGNUS ERICSSON创办,一直为电话奠下新里程。
1956年推出的花丽型电话ERICOFON已成经典。
1991年更推出首个数码电话系统。
7、HACKMAN芬兰家居用品之国,1790年由JOHANF.HACKMAN创办,发展至今已成为拥有ARABIA及ⅡTTALA的家居大哥,本身以生产厨房用具为主。
8、FRITZ HANSEN1872年于丹麦哥本哈根由FRITZ HANSEN成立的家具制造商,百年后已成为网罗最多北欧建筑大师的家具设计的品牌,由ARNE JACOBSON到POUL KJAERHOLM到VERNER PANTON 再到PIET HEIN等。
9、HASSELBLAD瑞典哈苏已成摄影发烧友的经典,由VICTOR HASSELBLAD于1948年创办,成绩有目共睹,是首个特地聘请设计师设计机身的相机品牌。
北欧轻奢床头柜工艺及材料说明
北欧风格家具是北欧风格家居的主要元素,它的特点是简洁,造型别致,做工精细,喜好纯色。
北欧风格家具借鉴了包豪斯设计风格,并融入斯堪迪纳维亚地区的特色,形成了以自然简约为主的独特风格。
北欧轻奢床头柜工艺:关键词就是,简约、人性。
是指二十世纪初,现代工业在北欧确立后,本土传统的手工艺与工业化结合起来,并受到欧洲大陆现代主义设计运动的影响,掀起了一场设计思潮的革命,将艺术与实用结合起来形成了一种更舒适更富有人情味的设计风格。
它改变了纯北欧风格过于理性和刻板的形象,融入了现代文化理念,加入了新材质的运用,更加符合国际化社会的需求。
材料说明:一、吸塑板:吸塑板一般基本材都是为密度板,它具有耐划耐热房屋防掉色等等作用,而且维护也很简单,是一种比较成熟的床头柜材料。
二、实木板:实木制作的床头柜风格比较偏为古典性,价位也比较高,他的门框为实木,一般都是在实木表面做造型,然后再喷漆,从而保持原生色的特殊视觉效果。
北欧风格装修特点及设计说明1.简约的设计:北欧风格注重简洁和实用性,拒绝过多的装饰和复杂的图案。
家具和摆设都具有简单的线条和几何形状。
整个空间呈现出干净、整洁和有序的感觉。
2.自然的材料:北欧风格的装修使用自然的材料,如木材、石材和纺织品。
木地板是常见的地板选择,为房间增添了温暖和舒适感。
家具通常采用原木或白色漆面的木材制作,以保持自然和朴实的风格。
3.淡雅的色彩:北欧风格的色彩通常以白色为主导,搭配灰色、蓝色和木色等中性色调。
这些淡雅的色彩使得空间看起来更加明亮、通透和宽敞。
同时,也能为居住者带来轻松和宽心的感觉。
4.舒适的照明:北欧地区在冬季有长时间的黑暗,因此照明在北欧风格装修中扮演着重要的角色。
充足而柔和的自然光线是理想的选择,可以通过大窗户和透明的材料来引入光线。
此外,还可以使用吊灯、台灯等照明设备来营造温暖和舒适的氛围。
5.自然的纺织品:北欧风格使用纺织品来增加空间的舒适度和温暖度。
常见的纺织品包括毯子、靠垫、窗帘和地毯。
这些纺织品通常具有简单而连续的图案,可以通过它们来给空间增添视觉层次感。
6.温馨的细节:北欧风格注重小细节的设计,如装饰画、挂件和植物。
装饰画可以用来增加空间的艺术感和个性化,挂件可以用来点缀空间,植物则可以用来带来生机和清新的氛围。
7.实用的储物:北欧风格的装修非常注重功能性,因此储物空间是必不可少的。
常见的储物解决方案包括壁橱、抽屉和收纳盒。
它们可以帮助保持空间的整洁,并有效利用空间。
总之,北欧风格装修以简约、舒适和功能性为重点,强调清爽的色彩、自然的材料和简洁的线条。
它的设计可以给人带来宜居、温馨和放松的感觉。
无论是注重生活质量的家庭还是喜欢简约风格的人群,北欧风格都是一个不错的选择。
浅谈北欧现代设计的特征及其影响北欧现代设计,主要是指欧洲北部四国挪威、丹麦、瑞典、芬兰等国的室内与家具设计风格。
纯粹、洗练、朴实的北欧现代设计,其基本精神在于:讲求功能性,设计以人为本。
北欧现代设计风格,起步于20世纪初期,形成于二次世界大战期间,一直发展到今天,是世界上最具影响力的设计风格流派之一。
人道主义的设计思想、功能主义的设计方法、传统工艺与现代技术的结合、宁静自然的北欧现代生活方式,这些都是北欧设计的源泉。
现代设计所谓北欧设计学派,主要是指欧洲北部四国挪威、丹麦、瑞典、芬兰的室内与家具设计风格。
纯粹、洗练、朴实的北欧现代设计,其基本精神就是:讲求功能性,设计以人为本。
北欧学派有三个主角在不同的发展时期分别充当先锋,瑞典在三四十年代最为著名,丹麦五六十年代发展迅速,而芬兰自本世纪崭露头角,实际上在每个时代都有独特的贡献,只是在20世纪60年代以后处在前卫的领导地位。
北欧各国另一个共同的特点是锁定自己的设计风格和设计路线,任外界干扰均不动摇,不被控制流派思想所支配,不随风摇摆,不随波逐流,充满了自信,坚持各自的设计路线和风格。
北欧学派大师林立,其间堪称鼻祖者只有埃利尔·沙里宁一人,埃利尔·沙里宁在城市规划、建筑设计、室内设计、家具设计、工业设计几乎所有设计领域的综合成就,而且因为他同时培养了一批顶尖级大师,这种培养不仅发生于他的祖国芬兰和北欧,更结硕果于大洋彼岸的美国。
埃利尔·沙里宁移居美国后创办的匡溪设计学院成为美国现代设计大师的摇篮,培养出小沙里宁、伊莫斯(Charles Eames)、伯托埃(Harrv Bertoia)等一批划时代人物,由此,埃利尔·沙里宁亦被称作美国现代设计之父。
自20世纪以来,北欧出现了一批杰出建筑设计师, 丹麦的著名建筑师A·雅科布森,代表作品有哥本哈根的斯堪的纳维亚皇家旅馆,瑞典建筑师R·厄斯金,代表作品有英国纽卡斯尔的贝克住宅区,丹麦建筑师J·乌特松,代表作品有澳大利亚的悉尼歌剧院,如瑞典的E·G·阿斯普伦德、芬兰的A·阿尔托,昂蒂·诺米斯耐米等。
本科生毕业设计(论文)外文翻译毕业设计(论文)题目:家具设计外文题目:SCANDINAVIAN FURNITURE DESIGN译文题目:北欧家具设计学生姓名: WJL 专业:工业设计指导教师姓名:评阅日期:Reference:Judith Gura Thames & Hudson Ltd .Scandinavian Furniture: A Sourcebook of Classic Designs for the 21st Century .2007-11Mike Roemer. INTERIOR AND FURNITURE DESIGN. Thames Hudson Press.2005SCANDINA VIAN FURNITURE DESIGNScandinavian design is 30 years in the 20th century Having achieved great success, and acquired an international reputation for design. The style is concerned, the Scandinavian design is the function of doctrine, but not as stringent as the 20th century, 30 years and doctrines.as stringent as the 20th century, 30 years and doctrines. Geometric form of soften, and edges are fairing into S-shaped curve or wavy lines, often described as "organic form", so that the form of more humane and angry. Before the war with Bauhaus functionalism as the center 40 years in the 20th century, under the difficult conditions of material deprivation is widely accepted, but by the mid-20th century, 40, functionalism has been gradually includes a number of practical and style changes. These changes left the Bauhaus pure geometric forms and "works" the language of aesthetics, most notably the Scandinavian design. As early as 1930, the Stockholm Fair, Germany, Scandinavian design will be a strict functionalism and local arts and crafts in the humanist tradition of integrating their together. In the 1939 New York International Exposition, but also established the "Swedish Modern style," as the concept of an international status. After the 20th century, 40 years after a difficult period, Scandinavian design in the 20th century, 50 years produced a new leap forward. Its simple and organic shape and natural color and texture very popular in the international arena. Milan Triennial in 1954, the international design exhibition, Scandinavian design show a new look, the participation of Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway have achieved great success. The design of these countries after the war, the organization implemented a policy of cooperation, their first major achievement was called "Scandinavian Design" exhibition. Arts Foundation in the United States under the sponsorship of this exhibition from 1954-1957 in North America in 22 years, the city's main museums around the world, thus making "Scandinavian design" the image of the widely popular in the international community. Function of theScandinavian modern design movement, the countries in the design organization at the national or local level, held a large number of exhibitions, the 20th century, these activities have become a key feature of the 50's. Scandinavian design of the Year, held alternately in various countries, affecting a wide range, which, together with the publications and periodicals for the design of the exchanges made a significant contribution. Design organizations not only exhibitions, they are also an important advocate in this area designed to encourage manufacturers to invest in a creative product development, to persuade the authorities to design policies to support its excellent design. They also inspire public awareness of good design and everyday use more beautiful thing, and this 50 to 60 for the 20th century, the early design development played an important role. In addition to designing the organization efforts, dominated the 20th century, 50 years of social and economic life of the development of the power of design has a more profound impact, with the process of industrialization and urbanization, the whole population structure has changed. Continuously improve the standard of living affected the majority of the people and their way of life, resulting in widespread optimism and confidence for the development and progress. New ideas begin to gain traction, such as that the ordinary people have the right to enjoy the comfort of home, the family is not only healthy, but also meets the functional and aesthetic requirements. In the 20th century, 50's, the ultimate welfare state built up in Scandinavia. The 20th century, 40 years in order to reflect the ethnic characteristics arising from a sense of nostalgia, often showing the pristine countryside, contributed to this softening trend. Early functionalism advocated by the primary color for the 20th century, 40 years to reconcile the color gradually replaced by a more coarse texture and natural materials by their favorite designers. After 1945, another retro trend - the Danish tradition of excellent craftsmanship in Sweden and Norway have also been strengthened. The 20th century, 50 years, a group of pre-war designers, such as the prestigious Henningsen, Klandt, mam Marsden, Aalto, etc. are still walking in the forefront of the design. For example, Henningsen, designed after the war, a number of new PH lamps, in particular, he designed a PH-5, and PH Artichoke pendant lamp has achieved great success and has sold briskly. The other hand, young designers have also come to the fore, thuspromoted the Scandinavian design of further development. Scandinavian design of the human touch is also reflected in the design of industrial equipment, in this respect Swedish industrial designer made a lot of work. From 1965 onwards, from Sweden, consisting of six designers "design team" involved in Solna, the company's offset printing production line development and design work, they operate on the production line process carried out a detailed ergonomic analysis and redesign the signs, symbols, instructions and manipulating the handle, so that working conditions have been greatly improved.Danish furniture design has a tradition dating back almost 450 years .In 1554, a n umber of cabinetmakers founded Koebenhavns Snedkerlaug (The Copenhagen Guild of Cabinetmakers) with the dual purpose of creating high-quality furniture and of prot ecting the trade from poor craftsmen by establishing formal training for cabin-makers. Two hundred years later,in 1777,Det Kongelige Meoble Magazine (The Royal Furnitu re Magazine) was established with the aim of manufacturing uniform,high-quality fur niture in terms of production and design for the Danish Royal Household and its vario us departments and ministries ,etc.The furniture was designed almost along the lines o f catalogue goods by the most renowned designers of the period,and their drawings w ere forwarded to master cabinetmakers all over the country,who then manufactured th em.After a brief period of only 40 years,the practice came to an end in 1815.The imp ortant thing is that the above-mentioned events were extremely visionary as regards q uality and design,and that they went on to form a solid foundation for later developme nt.Furthermore,Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademi (The Royal Danish Academy of Art) in Copenhagen, established a school of furniture design in 1770,whose purpose w as the education of furniture apprentices to draw and inspect masterpieces what amou nted to the world’s first systematic education of furniture designer.Throughout the 19t h century,indeed until the beginning of the 1920’s, there is an absence of an independe nt Danish style.The architects of the time are inspired by French, and particularly,Engl ish furniture and only design furniture for the wealthy upper classes and civil authoriti es. Peasants,farmers and the fledgling working class still do not represent an interestin g commercial body,but this picture changes with the country’s move from an agricultural society to an industrialized one towards the end of the last century.The cities almos t exploded in size and social awareness flew with the emergence of the new social clas ses-laborers and office workers-both of whom demanded monetary payment for their services.Put in simple terms,you might say that this was how the foundation of moder n consumer society came into being. Once current overheads had been met such as food,clothing,rent and heating ,etc.People still had the means to buy furniture,which in its own small way, created the basis for a formalized furniture industry.The furniture industry did not really take off until people began moving away from the cramped apartments in the city centers to larger apartments and detached houses on the outskirts of town.This happened in two stages,the first of which was in the 1920’s,when the social housing projects began and detached houses started to appear.The second stage was in the 1950’s,when both types of housing be fan to shoot up everywhere.This development,combined with a high level of knowledge and awareness,creatd a new and more rational housing culture where people began to demand high-quality functional furniture.As it turned out, people outside Denmark soon began to make the same kinds of demands.The 1920’s saw the desire for a purely Danish style of furniture.In 1924,a lecture ship in furniture design was established at Kunstakademiets Arkitektskole (The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts School of Architecture) in Copenhagen.The lectureship went to the Danish architect,Kaare Klint(1888-1954), who influenced the developmen t of Danish furniture design to a great degree.Kaare Klint was a systematist and a mod ernist who used his students to pioneer a series of surveys and analyses of furniture an d spatial needs. First and foremost,Kaare Klint represented the approach that furniture should be functional and user-friendly,an approach which in many ways deviated fro m the rest of Europe,where functionalism often took the form of formalistic exercises, directing its focus towards a well-to-do elite rather than the ordinary man in the street.The result was that a strong,independent,humanistic functionalism evolved in De nmark through the 1930’s and 40’s,culminating in an international breakthrough at the beginning of the 1950’s.A contributory factor to this breakthrough was the Guild or C abinetmakers’ annual autumn exhibition held for the first time in 1928.Here, young fu rniture designers could find collaborative partners among the established cabinetmaker workshops with an eye to developing new types of furniture.It was at these exhibitio ns that Danish architects like Hans J.Wegner,Ole Wanscher, Finn Juhl,Boerge Mogens en,Arne Jacobsen and many others made their breakthrough,and it was at these same e xhibitions in the period following the Second World War that,in particular the Americ an market,caught sight of Danish furniture design-Danish modern.The development of Danish furniture design continued forcefully up through the 1950’s and 60’s, resulting in a sharp increase in furniture exports.The starting point of Danish furniture production was joiner craftsmen furniture, but as technology develop ed ,production became increasingly industrialized and this affected the way in which a rchitects designed furniture. One of the best examples of the furniture of this period is architect, Professor Arne Jacobsen’s famous “Myren”(“The Ant”),designed in 1951 as a canteen chair for Novo Nordisk”s new medicinal factory.The chair was developed i n cooperation with the furniture manufacturer Fritz Hansen A/S. From the beginning, It was designed as an industrial product for mass production. Some years later, in 195 7,Arne Jacobsen designed a more streamlined version of “The Ant” for Fritz Hansen A/S, the so-called 7-series and these chairs became a huge success with 5 million chai rs sold to date. His collaboration with Fritz Hansen A/S continued until his death in 19 71. In addition to “The Ant” and the 7-series, Arne Jacobsen and Fritz Hansec succeed ed in creating a long series of Danish furniture classics, such as the easy chairs “Aegg et”(“The Egg”) and Svanen (“The Swan”), which Jacobsen designed for the SAS Roy al Hotel in Copenhagen in 1959. These two chairs were remarkable inasmuch as Jaco bsen pioneered the use of expanded polystyrene in furniture-chairs ahead of the times.There were others too, designers who designed industrially manufactured furnitu re. In 1942, FDB(The Danish Co-op Society) hired the 28 year old furniture designer, Borge Mogensen, as chief designer for FDB’s newly established furniture design studi o. Borge Mogensen was a former student of Kaare Klint, and Mogensen further devel oped Klint’s ideas regarding quality functional furniture for the ordinary consumer. F DB’s furniture was manufactured in wood, especially in the domestic wood sorts of oa k and beech. These chairs were designed for industrial manufacture and despite the fa ct this was “furniture for the common man”, it was still of a very high calibre, both in terms of functionality and design. Later on, Boerge Mogensen created a name for himself by designing exclusive furniture in an altogether different price bracket for afflue nt clientele. Despite this, he never diverged from his principles of functionality and us er-friendliness.The two designers who really put Denmark on the world map were Hans J.Wegn er (born 1914) and Finn Juhl (1912-1989). These two men came from radically differe nt backgrounds. Hans J.Wegner was the country craftsman who had received his traini ng as furniture designer at Kunsthaandvaerkerskolen (The Danish School of Arts &Cr afts). Jinn Juhl was the cosmopolitan academic from Copenhagen, who had been educ ated as an architect at the Kunstakademiet (The Royal Danish Academy of Jine Arts). Both men had an amazing feel for design and a deep-seated desire to create beautiful, functional furniture. As a result, they created a long series of furniture classics over a period lasting 40 years; classics which even today stand out as exceptional. Their prod uction of quality furniture is so extensive-Hans J.Wegner alone is responsible for mor e than 500 models-that it is impossible to highlight the work of one or the other. Partic ular examples of Hans J.Wegner’s unique design work are Kinastolen (“The Chinese Chair”) from 1945, The Chair from 1949, and Cirkelstolen (“The Circle Chair”) from 1986. Among Finn Juhl’s furniture are such highlights as his armchair made for the G uild of Cabinetmakers’ autumn exhibition in 1944 and Hoevdingstolen (The Chieftain Chair) from 1949. It was chairs like these that won Denmark its reputation as the worl d’s leading design nation.Around 1970, Denmark began to experience stiff competition from Italy at the nu merous furniture fairs around the world, and in particular, at the furniture fairs around the world, and in particular, at the furniture fairs in Cologne and Chicago. The Italian designers and furniture manufacturers moved in new directions and experimented wit h all kinds of materials and expression, which caused Danish furniture to appear behin d the times. It was really only the Danish designer, Verner Panton, who lived in Switz erland, who understood how to use the new man-made materials and create new desig ns.This was a critical period in Danish furniture design and for the Danish furniture in dustry which found it difficult to maintain its position as marker leader. This situation was not only caused by the challenge posed by the Italian designers. It was also the re sult of too much success.The good international reputation of Danish furniture design had built by a handf ul of furniture manufacturers who were interested in good design and the use of talent ed designers. In the wake of their success however, were a large number of less seriou s furniture manufacturers. Who swamped the market with unoriginal furniture, usually of poor quality, which was hastily marketed under the label of Danish Design.Fortunately, there were new, talented designers on the way up: people like the Da nish designers, Bernt, Rud Thygesen&Johnny Soerensen, Johannes Foersom&Peter H iort-Lorenzen, Gunver&Niels Joergen Haugesen, Joergen Gammelgaard, as well as N anna Ditzel and Poul Kjaerholm. These designers helped to lift the heavy legacy left t o them by the “Golden Age” of Danish design in the 1950’s and 60’s, and fortunately, there were still furniture manufacturers willing to bank on quality design.The greatest problem for Danish furniture design of the period was that the manu facture of furniture was becoming more and more industrialised. The meant that desig ners had to come up with far more rational designs than before. The fact that training at the architect and design colleges was to a high degree based on artistry and craftsm anship caused a good deal of friction between designers and manufacturers. Many des igners felt that the manufacturers only had an eye for profit margins and mass product ion. For their part, the manufacturers felt that the designers only thought about designi ng expensive furniture and of making a name for themselves. This was not a good fou ndation for developing Danish furniture design and both parties were lacking a viable model with which to move on. It was a small, elegant chair and accompanying table s eries in laminated beechwood which marked the start of the second “Golden Age” of Danish furniture design. The new furniture was presented at the annual Scandinavian Furniture Fair at The Bella Centre in 1974 and was designed by the young architects Rud Thygesen & Johnny soerensen for the furniture manufacturer Magnus Olesen A/S . The chair and the table series were specifically designed as industrial products in a f unctional design and were of a very high quality. To top it all, they were relatively che ap as well. The fact that this could be done was partly because the designers had redis covered the industrial and design qualities of the laminating technique, and partly bec ause they had gambled on the contract market rather on the market for household furn iture. The laminating technique was well known: the Finnish designer, Alvar Alto andthe Swedish designer, Bruno Mathsson had already created a long line of beautiful la minated furniture in the 1930’s and 40’s–and in Denmark, people like Arne Jacobsen had developed series of laminated furniture. What made Rud Thygesen & Johnny Soe rensen’s approach so unique was the fact that they regarded their furniture as industria l products instead of one-of-a-kind, craftsman-made goods. Their furniture was highly adapted to rational mass production, almost kike industrial design. More inportant stil l was the fact that an extremely viable model for collaboration between designers and manufacturers had been found. This model created a school of thought and convinced the furniture industry that good design could actually pay!As we approach a new century, there is every reason to have high expectations fo r the continued development of Danish furniture design. Never before has so much qu ality furniture been manufactured, and young, new designers are making their mark. P eople like the designer Troels Grum-Schwensen, Kasper Salto, Henrik Tengler, Hans Sandgren Jacobsen, Tom Srepp, Pelikan Design, Komplot Design and various other gr oups of designers. The most interesting feature of the development of furniture desig n from 1980 to the present day is that it essentially followed its own path, more or less uninfluenced by changing styles: the postmodernism, high-tech, neoclassic of the 198 0’s, the rediscovery of art deco at the beginning of the 1990’s together with neo-functi onalism and the renewed interest for the design of the 1960’s-all of these are styles wh ich have been ostentatiously introduced (and reintroduced) at the great furniture fairs i n Cologne and Milan since 1980, and nearly all have disappeared again. Danish furnit ure designers and furniture manufacturers however, have not felt tempted to follow th ese trends. This is not out of fear but rather out of a deep-rooted unwillingness to be di ctated to by whimsical trends which do not add anything new to furniture design. Inste ad, they have continued to develop and refine Scandinavian modernism which is chara cterised by its great care for detail and the manufacturing process, respect for the hum an anatomy, thorough analyses of requirements and use, aesthetics and considerations about form and function and rational production. This is a work approach which has at tracted wide international attention in the course of the last five to six years, and one which many international designers have tried to copy, as was the case with the Danis h furniture designs of “the Golden Age” 30-40 years ago.It is this same work approachwhich will probably guarantee the leading position of Danish furniture design for ma ny years to come: innovation via tradition.Given the fact that the western concept of art from the end of the 18th century m oved towards the ever-increasing independence of artistic expression, part of the task of modern art became to reassemble what had been dismantled. The boundary betwee n fine and mass culture narrowed.Visual art, architecture and applied art were to be se en as aspects of a common dream; the ideal of powerful, modern expression. The begi nning of the 20th century saw the introduction of the term “Gesamtkunstwerk”. A hou se was no longer a frame around random content. Buildings, furniture design, decorati ve art and interior design generally were to support the integral whole, which became greater than the sum of its individual parts.From the 1920’s and 30’s, the dominant German Bauhaus School greatly influenced design in Europe and America. Architect and School Director, Walter Gropius, expressed his intentions in the following way:”Our ultimate goal was the compound yet indivisible work of art, the unique building where the old boundary between the monumental and decorative elements vanished forever”.In Denmark, architects led by Arne Jacobsen, among others, were extremely stim ulated by this way of thinking. Here lay the keystone to the tradition of interrelationsh ip between architecture and interior design, which to this day remains an important ha llmark of Danish architects and designers. Since 1971,the architectural firm of Dissing +Weitling A/S has continued to run and develop Arne Jacobsen’s architect business, w ith employees in Denmark and around the world. The depth in Dissing+Weitling’s wo rk is exceptional but this also says something characteristic about the Danish approach . Here we find both a sense of wholeness as well as an attention to detail, and especiall y, the challenge of getting both elements to form a synthesis. Nothing is too small, let alone irrelevant to warrant care and attention.In addition to architectural buildings, Dissing+Weitling also carry out work in th e fields of furniture, lighting design, and medico-technical equipment. In all events, it is an attempt to merge the various parameters such as form, function, construction, ma terials and color to form a balanced expression whose hallmark is a strong visual ident ity, which is the leitmotif of the design process: A clarity and purity which has timeless and universal qualities. In this regard, Dissing+Weitling have done a supreme job of carrying on the legacy of Arne Jacobsen.Whereas at the close of this century, we have witnessed the noisier, mishmash of diversity of international design reflecting the spiri t of the times, here in Denmark-and the Nordic countries-the modernistic method and approach has prevailed. Design has been carried forward with moderation and variatio ns based on a tighter minimalism, focusing on the elements and dynamics of the indivi dual form, as well as a pronounced sensitivity for materials. There are many examples of how this subtle dialogue between space, furniture and interior design have found p owerful expression; designs which break up and imprint a different rhythm on the spa ce and the way in which fine contrasts such as the lineatity of the room are juxtaposed by the curvature of the reception area-a common, repeated theme in many interiors.It is important to remember that interior designers are not housebuilders like arch itects. Interior designers are given finished rooms whose interiors they have to design. For this reason, all interior design deals with “treatment of the room” and the Scandin avian tradition for this is strongly linked to Scandinavian modernism, i.e. humanism a nd democracy paired with functionalism, which again is linked to the architectural tra dition.The restoration of old buildings also exerts an influence on the work of Danish architects and interior designers. An extensive series of buildings has been restored wi th respect for existing architecture and the qualities of past design. Many buildings ha ve been thoroughly renovated with an eye to meeting new functions and modern requi rements.The balance between maintaining the original distinctive architectural feature s and ensuring a modern design poses a continuing challenge. This is exactly where a comprehensive staging with the designing of special furniture and fixtures can becom e a means of ensuring a uniformity of style and expression.参考文献:朱迪思·古拉泰晤士和哈德逊公司.斯堪的纳维亚家具:21世纪的原始资料的经典设计.2007-11迈克•罗莫. 室内与家具设计. Thame Hudson出版社.2005北欧家具设计斯堪的纳维亚设计是在20世纪30年代即已取得较大成就,并获得了国际声誉的设计风格。