GMAT写作题库范文(十七)

GMAT⾼分范⽂100篇（⾮此即彼逻辑错误）【圣才出品】◆⾮此即彼逻辑错误Argument72增加长期通勤乘客使⽤公家车频率的⽅法The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper.“Commuter use of the new subway train is exceeding the transit company’s projections.However,commuter use of the shuttle buses that transport people to the subway stations is below the projected volume.If the transit company expects commuters to ride the shuttle buses to the subway rather than drive there,it must either reduce the shuttle bus fares or increase the price of parking at the subway stations.”Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument.For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion.You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument,what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what,if anything,would help you better evaluate its conclusion.【参考范⽂】The author concludes that the local transit company must either reduce fares for the shuttle buses that transport people to their subway stations or increase parking fees at the stations.The reasons offered to support this conclusion are thatcommuter use of the subway train is exceeding the transit company’s expectations, while commuter use of the shuffle buses is below projected volume.This argument is unconvincing because the author oversimplifies the problem and its solutions in a number of ways.To begin with,by concluding that the transit company must either reduce shuttle fares or increase parking fees,the author assumes that these are the only available solutions to the problem of limited shuttle use.However,it is possible that other factors—such as inconvenient shuttle routing and/or scheduling,safety concerns,or an increase in carpools—contribute to the problem.If so,adjusting fares or parking fees would might not solve the problem.In addition,the author assumes that reducing shuttle fees and increasing parking fees are mutually exclusive alternatives.However,the author provides no reason for imposing an either/or choice.Adjusting both shuttle fares and parking fees might produce better results.Moreover,if the author is wrong in the assumption that parking fees and shuttle fees are the only possible causes of the problem,then the most effective solution might include a complex of policy changes—for example,in shuttle fares,parking fees,rerouting,and rescheduling.In conclusion,this argument is weak because the author oversimplifies both the problem and its possible solutions.To strengthen the argument the author must examine all factors that might account for the shuttle’s unpopularity. Additionally,the author should consider all possible solutions to determine which combination would bring about the greatest increase in shuttle use.【范⽂点评】题⼲中的社论提出下调公交车车票价格或增加地铁站停车场停车费，从⽽解决通勤旅客乘坐地铁情况超出运输公司预计，⽽乘坐公交车通勤旅客数量低于预计的问题。

GMAT优秀作文范文精选Businesses and other organizations have overemphasized the importance of working as a team. Clearly, in any human group, it is the strong individual, the person with the most mitment and energy, who gets things done.企业和其他组织过分强调了团队工作的重要性。

很明显，在任何人类团体里，都是最强的个人，那个具有最多义务和能量的人，把事情完成的。

The relationship between teamwork and individual strength, energy, and mitment is plex; whether they operate in a plementary or antagonistic manner depends on: the goals toward which the traits are directed, the degree of emphasis on teamwork, and the job of the individual within an organization.A persons ability to work effectively in a team is not in consistent per se with personal strength, energy, and mitment. If exercised in a self-serving mannerfor example, through pilfering or back stabbingthese traits can operate against the organization. Conversely, if directed toward the firms goals, these traits can motivate other team members, thereby advancing mon goals. World War II generals Patton and Rommel understood this point and knew how to bring out the best individual qualities in their troops, while at the same time instilling a strong sense of team and mon purpose.Nevertheless, over-emphasizing teamwork can be counterproductive for an organization. A suessful team requires both natural leaders and natural followers; otherwise, a team will aomplish little. Undue emphasis on teamwork may quell initiative among natural leaders,thereby thwarting team goals. Also, teamwork can be overemphasized with a missioned sales force of highlypetitive and autonomic individuals. Overemphasis on teamwork here might stifle healthy petition, thereby defeating a firms objectives. In other organizational areas, however, teamwork is critical. For example, a product-development team must progress in lock-step fashion toward mon goals, such as meeting a rollout deadline.。

GMAT考试写作参考GMAT考试写作参考例文精选Some people believe that the best approach to effective time management is to make detailed daily and long-term plans and then to adhere to them. However, this highly structured approach to work is counterproductive. Time management needs to be flexible so that employees can respond to unexpected problems as they arise.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.The speaker claims that a detailed time-management plan fails to afford adequate flexibility to deal with the unexpected at the workplace. He seems to offer an either/or choice between planning ones time rigidly, by detailing important daily as well as long-term plans, and not planning at all; and he prefers the second choice. The speakers claim is overly simplistic, since it is possible for a detailed time-management plan to also provide flexibility.Working at any job without a detailed road map for the immediate and longer-term can trivialize the efforts of both employees and organizational units so that all their efforts bee aimless. The only sensible way proceed is toconsider first ones most important long-term objectives; then an organizational unit and its employees can orderdaily and weekly tasks aording to how much each adds to the achievement of those objectives. With a broader perspective, workers can eliminate from the list those daily activities that may seem urgent or may be most enjoyable but dontreally contribute to long-term job goals or toorganizational objectives.。

GMAT作文及解析2017年GMAT作文范文及解析阅读别人写的好的作文并不是为了抄袭，而是给自己写作文提供多一点思路。

下面是店铺整理的2017年GMAT作文范文及解析，希望对大家有用，更多消息请关注应届毕业生网。

GMAT作文范文及解析：修建多层停车场The following is from an editorial that appeared in a River City newspaper.“The Clio Development Group wants to build a multilevel parking garage on Dock Street in River City, but the plan should not be approved. Most of the buildings on the block would then have to be demolished. Because these buildings were erected decades ago, they have historic significance and must therefore be preserved as economic assets in the effort to revitalize a restored riverfront area. Recall how Lakesburg has benefited from business increases in its historic downtown center. Moreover, there is plenty of vacant land for a parking lot elsewhere in River City.”给River城的报纸的编辑的一封信：Clio发展商不应该被允许在Dock街修建多层停车场，因为这个街区的大多数建筑将被摧毁。

7 MammonP1+P2=CP1——P2——...——C两个途径——x——提高服务质量—x—树立竞争优势P1 不一定推出P2即使P1能推P2，P2不一定推出CP2即使能推出C 仍需考虑其他问题1 两个途径不一定提高服务质量（BANK?）SAFETY QUALITYA 减少——teller（Our Task无法提高服务质量——竞争优势就没有了）I 这样做提高了服务的效率因此能提高服务质量【——最终增加竞争力】E 虽然提高了效率但是可能降低了【安全性——比如点钱点错了】——B #延长营业时间——效率——可能出现错误2 提高了服务质量——其他竞争机构提供相同相似的方案——竞争优势：人无我有人有我优【结论如果是比较量，前提必须是比较量】3 （竞争力/竞争优势）的要素？？LocationM 提高服务质量——增加满意度——竞争优势I 作者认为服务质量是决定竞争力的唯一要素P 忽略其他可能性E If 决定M 和其他机构优势的要素是location 或其他，即使提高服务质量也不能从根本上超过其他机构The customer-service division of Mammon Savings and Loan recommends that the best way for the bank to attract new customers and differentiate itself from its competitors is to improve its service to customers—specifically, by reducing waiting time in teller lines, opening for business 30 minutes earlier, and closing an hour later. These improvements, it is argued, will give the bank the edge over its competitors and make it appear more customer-friendly. For the most part this recommendation is well-reasoned; a few concerns must be addressed, however.The first concern is that either of the two methods to improve costumer service may turn out to be having the opposite effect.In introducing the shortened timing for customers waiting in front of the teller line, the author implied that this improvement is representative of better service. But the truth is this new plan could even worsen the situation. Normally, a longer time enables clerks tocount the cash for another once or twice, the accuracy of exchanges would be strengthened. If under this new policy, the accuracy were damaged due to the squeezed waiting time, the service could not be improved, THEREFORE THE CUSTOMER SIRVICE WOULD ALSO BE QUESTIONED, THUS THE EDGE M possessing over competitors would be lost.。

新GMAT作文黄金80题范文(按2010年新题库更正题号；按《北美GMAT范文精讲》删除题目及范文,保留此书上没有的题目及范文) By winnie 一．Analysis of Issue QuestionsIssue 21.To conserve the energy is a world-wide project. No individual country is able to do it independently.2.It is unfair to let individual nations to make sacrifices while the others do not.3.The best and the most efficient way is the whole wolrd conserve the energy simultaneously andcollectively.1，首先，虽然不愿意，但仍然要承认，自私几乎是天性。

self consideration优先。

在没有广泛的行动时，每一个国家都不愿意在自己作出牺牲的同时，其他国家没有行动。

这样不公平，也不可能达到。

这时，领导的作用很重要。

安排各国家工作，协调各国家活动。

有一个行动的指导作用。

function as the leader of the group.2，而且，保护资源是全球的问题，指望单个国家作出牺牲是不够的。

因为在全球化经济发展下，资源几乎是全球运转的。

比如，美国会向中国进口木材等原料。

所以需要合作。

大的跨国公司在其中扮演重要的角色。

比如，开发非洲的，有很多是欧洲的公司，跨国公司的举动会影响到很多国家的经济政策。

nuclear weapons proliferationby the same token(同样道理)the problem of energy conservation transcends the national borders in that either all nations must cooperate, or all will suffer.(sample上的句子)3，当然，这样是不够的，必须由各个国家充分地发挥主动的作用take positive action。

GMAT考试的优秀作文关于GMAT考试的优秀作文精选为了方便广大考生更好的复习，综合整理了备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选，以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。

This ad recommends non-prescription Acid-Ease over non-prescription Pepticaid for relief of excess stomach acid. The only reason offered is that doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for the full-strength prescription form of Acid-Ease than for full-strength Pepticaid. While this reason is relevant, and provides some grounds for preferring Acid-Ease over Pepticaid, it is insufficient as it stands because it depends on three unwarranted assumptions.The first assumption is that the prescription form of Acid-Ease is more popular among doctors. But this might not be the case, even though doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for Acid-Ease. Acid-Ease may have been available for several more years than Pepticaid; and in the years when both products were available, Pepticaid might have actually been prescribed more often than Acid-Ease.The second assumption is that doctors prefer the prescription form of Acid-Ease for the reason that it is in fact more effective at relieving excess stomach acid. However, doctors may have preferred Acid-Ease for reasons other than its effectiveness. Perhaps Acid-Ease is produced by a larger, more familiar drug company or by one that distributes more free samples. For that matter, the medical community may have simply been mistaken in thinking that Acid-Ease was more effective. In short, the number of prescriptions by itself is not conclusive as to whether one product is actually better thananother.。

一、GMAT作文经典范文有什么"It is difficult for people to achieve professional success without sacrificing important aspects of a fulfilling personal life。

" Discuss the extent to which you agree ordisagree with the opinion slated above。

Support your views with reasons and/orexamples from your own experience, observations, or reading。

（理想和现实） Are professional success and a fulfilling personal life mutually exclusive? Probably not, although it is more difficult today to achieve both。

Undeniably, today's professionals must worklong hours to keep their heads above water, let alone to get ahead in life financially。

In conclusion, given the growing demands of career on today's professionals, a fulfilling personal life remains possible-by working smarter, by setting priorities, and by making suitable career choices。

GMAT的优秀作文参考关于GMAT的优秀作文参考Employees should keep their private lives and personal activities as separate as possible from the workplace.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.Should employees leave their personal lives entirely behind them when they enter the workplace, as the speaker suggests here? While I agree that employees should not allow their personal lives to interfere with their jobs, the speaker fails to consider that integrating personallife with work can foster a workplace ambiance that helps everyone do a better job, thereby promoting suess for the organization.Engaging coworkers in oasional conversation about personal interests and activities can help buildcollegiality among coworkers that adds to their sense of mon purpose on the job. Managers would be well advised to participate in and perhaps even plan the sharing of personal informationas a leadership tool as well as a morale booster. An employee feels valued when the boss takes time to ask about the employees family or recent vacation. The employee, in turn, is likely to be more loyalto and cooperative with the boss. Company-sponsored social eventspiics, parties, excursions, and so forthalso help to produce greater cohesiveness in an organization, by providing opportunities for employees to bond with one another in ways that translate into better working relationships.。

GMAT考试作⽂GMAT考试作⽂精品模板 想要迅速提升GMAT作⽂的写作⽔平，⾸先就需要考⽣们参考⼤量的GMAT作⽂模板，并以此为基础不断的去总结，从⽽才能更好的掌握GMAT作⽂的写作规律。

下⾯就来为⼤家推荐⼀些GMAT作⽂的精品模板，希望能够为考⽣备考GMAT作⽂考试带来帮助。

模板⼀ In the given memorandum, the director of human resources department concluded that the employee satisfactory was surely improved after HR department’s effort on enhancing communication between management team and the staff. To support his idea, he alleged that such communication was ranked top in a previous survey so that this issue must be the cared most by employees. At first glance, this conclusion seems to some extent convincing. However, with close examination, we can find at least 3 logic flaws. I would like to discuss in the following paragraphs to disclose how groundless the allegation is. First, the director’s conclusion is based on a doubtful survey. As the director introduced, the methodology of this survey is to have employees rank the issues according to the importance. To find out whether the survey results are reliable, we need to ask several questions: How many employees are included in this survey? Are they representative to the total staff? Does the questionnaire included all the issues cared by the employees? Is there any possibility that the staff are unwilling to disclose their true thoughts since the survey might require them to sign their names on the questionnaire? Without answers to the questions above, the director can not responsibly conclude that the survey result is reliable enough for the management to draw a decision. Second, given the survey result is representative and reliable, the communication issue constantly ranked top only suggests that it’s considered important, rather than that management need to improve. Very possibly, the management communication is already well carried out in company X, while some other issues ranked second or third, which are still important, are poorly noticed, and are the real cause of dissatisfaction Last but not least, even if the communication issue is the key to enhance employee moral, and more effort focused on this issue is the right way to solve the problem, however, this does not guarantee that the issue is solved. The director should carefully examine the effect of such actions - maybe through another survey - so as to make sure that every effort they made has achieved the expected result. In summation, the argument is not as persuasive as it stands. Since the survey has not been proven reliable and the importance of communication does not necessarily suggest that there is any weakness on the issue, we have every reason to cast our doubt on the director’s conclusion that enhancing communication is the key to improve morale. Furthermore, it is imprudent for the director to suggest that the campaign that his department held is effective. To convince us, the director needs to demonstrate that employee’s satisfaction does rise after the campaign. With such solid evidence, the arguer could further explore on the questionnaire and take some other solutions into account rather than directly jump intosuggestion/conclution that… . 模板⼆ Totally disagree: Some people keep talking about the problem of ..., claiming that ....If there is one-which I leave to doubt-then it probably came from the misunderstanding or misconduct, rather than the idea itself. *** is one of the most important elements in our modern society. No matter how much we are reluctant to ... or how hard it is to make it happen, we have to adjust ourselves and embrace ..., for a ... First, in order to reveal the flaws underlying in the assertion above, we need to clarify the definition of ...Let us get down to fundamentals and admit that ...example 1. Therefore, no matter how reluctant we are to admit, ...was, is, and always will be an inevitable trend in our society. Rather than make hopeless effort to ..., people should face the reality and start to ... Second, ...is hard, but it’s never a mission impossible. Besides the emerging new technologies which can help us to make ...easier, ... can also contribute to...example 2. However, just as the author pointed out, ...sometimes has its side effects, especially when...To avoid ..., we should always stay cautious and keep in mind that...After all... To sum up, it’s my firmly hold view that... It is the ...that drive us forward, equip us with ...Though it sometimes..., we can avoid ... by ... ********************************************** Agree on both sides: ...and ..., which do you prefer? The arguer in the given material favor ..., which I do admit its advantages. However, just as a coin has its two sides, ...fails to work on ..., whereas it is applaused when...On the contrary, ...sometimes works perfectly. In my opinion, the issue of ...should be discussed case by case. On the one hand, we do need ..., since ....Reason...For instance,...When under such circumstances, I am the enthusiastic support of ... On the other hand, ...has its ground. When..., it is important to ...Let us take the case of ... as an example...Considering the ...and ..., people with common sense would obviously agree that... Maybe you will tease at me like President Harry S Truman saying "Give me a one-hand economist!". However, that’s the reality when we face such dilemmas. In some circumstances, we must integrate the both side, such as we put hands together to when we play golf: in the face of extremely complex situations, we do need a combination of ...and ... That is to say, we need to ..., and also ...The rapid development of our society is requiring far more sophisticated problem-solving skills. We have little chance to win with a simplified code of conduct. 模板三 Agree Dear reader, I’m Chinese, and what nationality are you? - Never mind, we are all human beings living in this world village. It is our responsibility to work together and make our home better. The arguer in the given material suggested that as global citizen, we should first be responsible to our earth, and then take the job to do benefit to our own countries. However, I see no conflicts between the to. If there is any, I believe we can easily solve it, since all people in this world will reach the same long-term target without difficulty. On the one hand, when we are working on your motherland, we are contributing to the whole human race. For example, a scientist working in his laboratory will share his findings no matter whether he is aiming to "make a better world" or just to contribute to his own country. In such a fast-developing era, science and technology has no boarders. All the invention, with or without penalty, will finally become the fortune of all the people on this planet. In such circumstances, when we protect the environment of our own village, we are doing favor to the whole nature. When we are making every effort to save energy, no matter by taking the underground instead of driving, or by supporting our government to invest on solar energy development, with your ballot and our tax dollars, we are playing our role of a responsibly citizen - both of the nation, and of the world. On the other hand, when we are saving our planet, we are saving our own country. Nowadays, many people with mutual belief work beyond the border on global affair. For instance, the Green Peace, a global NGO active in many countries, recruit members from all over the world, and serve all over the world. They generally believe that the environment is an organic whole. The pollution caused by low-level manufacturing in China would also poison the shrimps that American people devour. However, we have to admit that sometimes citizens, as well as nations, could appear selfish and shortsighted while exhausting their environment resources for short-round benefit. In this case, we do need to call for international cooperation to restrict such behaviors and protect our common homeland. To summarize, I would like to suggest that it is not necessary to distinguish the citizens for one country or for the globe. As long as we keep our mutual homeland, the earth, in mind, we can generally avoid the dilemma, and do what we consider right. 模板四 第⼀段 : 选择1 In the argument, the author concludes that … To support his conclusion, the author cites the study indicating that …/the author points out/reasons that … In addition, the author mentions (the evidence) that … Based on this evidence, the author further recommends that …(subjunctive动词原形)/recommends …(doing). At first glance, the analysis appears thorough and compelling. However, a close/careful examination reveals various logical flaws which render the author’s line of reasoning questionable. 选择2 … (陈述同选择1) After a careful examination, I find that the argument, apparently compelling, is not well supported by the evidence. 最后⼀段：选择1 By way of conclusion, it seems that the author’s conclusion that … is seriously undermined by the (numerous) flaws in his reasoning identified above. To substantiate/strengthen the argument, the author would have to provideclear/concrete/solid/credible evidence that … In addition, the author should take into consideration that … Unless these key issues are properly addressed, the argument isn’t sound and convincing. 选择2 To sum up, it is imprudent for the author to draw the conclusion that … solely on the basis of the evidence presented, which is insufficient to lend strong support to what the author claims.// It is clear that the author fails to provide more credible evidence to support his conclusion that … To make this analysis more thorough, the author must firstly investigate … (sth.) and then provide evidence that (1) … , and (2) … To better assess/evaluate the argument, I would also need to know whether … 各种推理错误： A. 错误地认定某趋势会⼀直延续下去 In the argument, the authors stated that … Although the trend/tendency cited in the study has remained stable for the past 10 years, there is no guarantee that it/the same trend will continue over the next 20 years. The study’s results can hardly be used to predict the future. It is entirely possible/very likely that … If that is the case, … Thus the credibility of the author’s assertion is called into question. Even if the trend given in the argument will be true over the next 20 years, /Even if we grant the preceding assumption that … , /Even supposing that the same trend will continue over the next 20 years, …… B. 错误地认为某⼀事物的.程度⼤到⾜以引起某些变化 The author attributes … to the fact that … However, this line of reasoning is problematic, since no evidence is provided concerning the extent/degree to which … Perhaps … Or it is possible that … Either of these scenarios, if true, will render this connection worthless/doubtful. C. 错误地认为X就是由Y引起的，忽视了其他可能原因 In the argument, the author ascribes X to the fact that/claims that … However, it is not necessarily the case. This alone does not constitute a logical argument in favor of …// Many other factors may equally contribute to the results/could bring out the same results/may account for/affect ... // While … is one way to achieve the results, it is by no means the only way. For instance, … The argument is unsound/unwarranted until such possibilities are taken into account/considered and ruled out. // Without solid evidence linking X to Y, it is presumptuous to suggest that Y is totally responsible for these results. D. 错误地认为Y发⽣在X前，X就是Y引起的;错误地将同时发⽣的X与Y认为成由因果联系 To begin with, the author unfairly assumes that … is the cause of sth. cited. The sequence of these events, by themselves, is not sufficient to demonstrate that the former causes the latter because a chronological relationship is only one of the indicators of a causal relationship between two events./ However, the mere fact that … precedes … is insufficient to conclude that it causes these events. Perhaps … Moreover, … may not necessarily indicate that … It is also highly possible that … No additional evidence linking … and … is offered in the argument, making for the possibility that these events are not causally related but merely coincident. E. 错误的⼀概适⽤/横向对⽐ Even if … it does not follow that … According to the author, X is analogous to Y in all respects. A thorough analysis reveals, however, that the differences between X and Y outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy less than valid. For example, … affect X’s results but are virtually absent in Y. These differences may w e a k e n a c o n c l u s i o n b a s e d o n t h e a n a l o g y b e t w e e n X a n d Y / w e a k e n t h e c o n c l u s i o n t h a t X w i l l s u f f e r f r o m t h e s a m e f a t e a s Y i s . / p >。