下载文档原格式
比尔盖茨ted演讲稿以下是聘才小编为大家搜索整理的，欢迎大家阅读。
比尔盖茨ted演讲稿中英文演讲稿：Stanford University。
(斯坦福大学)BILL GATES: Congratulations, class of XX!比尔·盖茨：XX届毕业生，祝贺你们顺利毕业(Cheers)。
(欢呼)Melinda and I are excited to be here. It would be a thrill for anyone to be invited to speak at a Stanford commencement, but it's especially gratifying for us. Stanford is rapidly becoming the favorite university for members of our family, and it's long been a favorite university for Microsoft and our foundation。
我和梅琳达怀着激动的心情与你们欢聚在此共贺毕业。
能受邀到斯坦福大学学位授予典礼上做演讲是一件让人激动的事，对我们而言，这尤为荣幸。
斯坦福大学正日渐成为我们家庭成员最喜爱的大学。
而长久以来，斯坦福也是微软以及比尔与梅琳达基金会最喜爱的一所大学。
”Our formula has been to get the smartest, most creative people working on the most important problems. It turns out that a disproportionate number of those people are at Stanford. (Cheers)。
我们一直致力于让最聪颖有创造力的人攻克最为重要的问题。
比尔盖茨演讲稿尊敬的各位领导、嘉宾和朋友们：大家好！首先，我要感谢主办方邀请我来到这里演讲。
作为微软的创始人和慈善基金会的创始人，我感到非常荣幸能够与大家一起分享我的观点和经验。
我想谈谈关于技术创新和社会责任的话题。
在过去的几十年里，科技行业取得了巨大的进步并给我们的生活带来了巨大的变化。
然而，我们也面临着很多挑战和问题。
作为科技行业的一员，我们有责任解决这些问题并为未来做出贡献。
首先，我想谈谈全球贫困问题。
目前，全球大约有10亿人生活在贫困线以下，他们缺乏食物、水和基本的生活条件。
作为科技行业的领军者，我们应该利用我们的技术和资源来帮助解决这个问题。
我们可以通过创新的方式提供给他们更便宜、更有效的解决方法，比如提供廉价的农业技术，提供清洁水源和改善卫生条件等等。
其次，我想谈谈教育问题。
教育是人类社会发展的基石，但是目前全球还有很多人没有接受到良好的教育。
我们应该努力改变这一状况。
我们可以利用科技创新来提供教育资源，比如开发在线教育平台和提供免费的教育课程等等。
通过这些方式，我们可以帮助更多贫困地区的孩子接受到良好的教育，提高他们的生活水平和未来的发展。
最后，我想谈谈环境问题。
目前，全球变暖和气候变化已经成为世界面临的最大挑战之一。
科技行业在这个问题上可以发挥重要作用。
我们可以推动可持续发展和环保产业，开发绿色能源和减少碳排放等方面的技术创新。
通过这些努力，我们可以保护地球的生态环境，为我们的子孙后代留下一个更美好的世界。
在解决这些问题的过程中，我们也要注意技术的合理应用和社会风险的防范。
科技创新是一把双刃剑，虽然可以带来巨大好处，但也会带来一些潜在的风险。
我们应该坚持科技的道德和伦理原则，不断提高技术的安全性和可靠性，防止技术带来的负面影响。
总之，作为科技行业的从业者，我们有责任解决全球的问题，为社会做出贡献。
通过技术创新和社会责任的结合，我们可以创造一个更加公平、公正和可持续发展的世界。
让我们携起手来，共同努力，为这个伟大的目标而奋斗！谢谢大家！。
比尔盖茨演讲稿英文回答：Thank you so much for having me. I'm Bill Gates, andI'm here today to talk to you about the future of technology and how it can help us solve some of the world's biggest challenges.I've been working in the tech industry for over 40 years, and I've seen firsthand how technology has the power to transform lives. When I started out, personal computers were still a novelty. Today, they're an essential part of our lives. We use them to stay connected with friends and family, to learn new things, to be entertained, and to get work done.Technology is also changing the way we work. In the past, most people worked in offices. Today, more and more people are working remotely. This is thanks in part to the rise of cloud computing, which allows us to access ourfiles and applications from anywhere.Technology is also having a major impact on the way we learn. In the past, most people learned in traditional classrooms. Today, there are many more opportunities to learn online. This is thanks in part to the rise of massive open online courses (MOOCs), which allow anyone to take courses from top universities for free.Of course, technology is not without its challenges. One of the biggest challenges is the digital divide. This is the gap between those who have access to technology and those who don't. The digital divide is a serious problem because it can prevent people from accessing education, healthcare, and other essential services.Another challenge is the issue of privacy. As we become more and more connected, we're also sharing more and more of our personal information. This information can be used to track our movements, target us with advertising, and even manipulate our behavior.Despite these challenges, I believe that technology has the potential to make the world a better place. If we use technology wisely, we can solve some of the world's biggest challenges, such as poverty, disease, and climate change.I'm optimistic about the future of technology. Ibelieve that it has the power to make the world a more just, equitable, and sustainable place.中文回答：非常感谢各位邀请我来演讲。
比尔盖茨演讲稿比尔盖茨演讲稿【一】I've always been an optimist and I supposed thatis rooted in my belief that the power of creativity andintelligence can make the world a better place.我天生乐观，坚信人类凭创造力和聪明才智能够让世界日益美妙，这个设想一直根植于我的内心深处。
For as long as I can remember, I've loved learning newthings and solving problems. So when I sat down at a computerfor the first time in seventh grade, I was hooked. It's was aclunky and teletype machine that barely do anything comparedto the computer we have today. But it changed my life.自从记事起，我就热衷于接触新事物、挑战难题。
可想而知，我上七年级时第一次坐在计算机前是何等着迷，如入无我之境。
那是一台锵锵作响的旧牌机器，和我们今天拥有的计算机相比，它相当逊色几乎一无所用，但正是它改变了我的生活。
When my friend Paul Allen and I stared Microsoft 30 yearsago, we had a vision of "a computer on every desk and inevery home," which probably sounded a little too optimisticat a time when most computers were the size of refrigerators.But we believe that personal computer would change the world.And they have.30 年前，我和朋友保罗·艾伦创办微软时，我们幻想实现" 在每个家庭、在每张办公桌上都有一台计算机 " ，这在绝大部分的计算机体积如同冰箱的尺寸的年代，听起来有点异想天开。
比尔盖茨演讲稿英文回答：My fellow global citizens, esteemed colleagues, and distinguished guests,。
It is with great honor and gratitude that I standbefore you today to share my thoughts on the transformative power of technology and its potential to shape a better future for all. Throughout my career, I have had the privilege of witnessing firsthand the profound impact that technological advancements can have on our lives. From the advent of the personal computer to the rise of the internet, technology has revolutionized the way we communicate, learn, work, and connect with one another.As we look ahead to the next chapter of human history,it is clear that technology will continue to play a pivotal role in shaping our world. We are on the cusp of a new eraof technological innovation, marked by the convergence ofartificial intelligence, machine learning, and the Internet of Things. These technologies have the power to unlock unprecedented opportunities and solve some of the world's most pressing challenges.For example, artificial intelligence can be used to develop personalized learning experiences that cater to each student's unique needs. Machine learning can help us identify patterns and make predictions that can improve healthcare outcomes. And the Internet of Things can create interconnected systems that enable us to manage our energy consumption, reduce traffic congestion, and improve public safety.However, it is important to recognize that the transformative power of technology also comes with responsibilities. As we embrace new technologies, we must carefully consider their potential impact on our society and the environment. We need to ensure that technology is used for good and that it does not exacerbate existing inequalities or create new ones.One of the most urgent challenges we face is thedigital divide. Around the world, there are still billions of people who lack access to the internet and the transformative technologies that come with it. This divide not only limits their opportunities but also hinders our collective progress. We must work together to bridge this digital divide and ensure that everyone has the opportunity to benefit from the transformative power of technology.Another challenge we must address is the issue of privacy and data security. As technology becomes more pervasive in our lives, we are generating vast amounts of personal data. It is essential that we protect this data from misuse and ensure that it is used in a responsible and ethical manner.To ensure that technology is used for good, we need to foster a culture of collaboration and multi-stakeholder engagement. Governments, businesses, civil society organizations, and individuals all have a role to play in shaping the future of technology. We need to work together to create a framework that promotes innovation whilesafeguarding our values and protecting the public interest.In conclusion, the transformative power of technology holds immense promise for our future. But to harness this power and create a better world for all, we must use technology wisely and responsibly. We must bridge thedigital divide, protect privacy and data security, andfoster a culture of collaboration. By working together, we can harness the transformative power of technology tocreate a future that is more just, equitable, and sustainable for all.中文回答：尊敬的全球同胞们、亲爱的同事们和尊贵的来宾们，。
比尔盖茨哈佛演讲稿比尔盖茨夫妇TED演讲稿几月后,我们结婚了,我们想通过这次旅行看看野生动物和热带草原.真是太美了.比尔和我从来没有放过这么长的假.但是真正让我们深受触动的是那儿的人,那儿的贫穷.我们开始扪心自问,一切只能是这样吗？BillGates:Well,wedecidedthatwe"dpicktwocauses,whateverthebiggestinequ itywasglobally,andtherewelookedatchildrendying,childrennothavingenoug hnutritiontoeverdevelop,andcountriesthatwerereallystuck,becausewithth atlevelofdeath,andparentswouldhavesomanykidsthatthey"dgethugepopulati ongrowth,andthatthekidsweresosickthattheyreallycouldn"tbeeducatedandl iftthemselvesup.Sothatwasourglobalthing,andthenintheU.S.,bothofushave hadamazingeducations,andwesawthatasthewaythattheU.S.couldliveuptoitsp romiseofequalopportunityisbyhavingaphenomenaleducationsystem,andthemo rewelearned,themorewerealizedwe"renotreallyfulfillingthatpromise.比尔·盖茨：我们决定选择两个方面：任何世界上最不公平的事,这指的是垂死的儿童,营养跟不上的儿童,因为高死亡率发展停滞不前的国家,国家人口剧长,孩子病得太重,他们没法受教育养活自己.这是世界的情况,而在美国,我们夫妻俩都受过良好的教育,我们看到美国实现机会平等这一承诺的途径就是其良好的教育体系.我们了解的越多,就越深刻地意识到我们并没有完全兑现我们的承诺.Sothisisastorylargelyofvaccines.Smallpoxwaskillingacouplemillionki dsayear.Thatwaseradicated,sothatgotdowntozero.Measleswaskillingacoupl emillionayear.That"sdowntoafewhundredthousand.Anyway,thisisachartwher eyouwanttogetthatnumbertocontinue,andit"sgoingtobepossible,usingthesc ienceofnewvaccines,gettingthev.accinesouttokids.Wecanactuallyacceleratetheprogress.所以这个故事主要说的是疫苗.以前,每年有几百万的儿童死于天花.现在我们摆脱它了,死亡数变成了零.每年有百万人死于麻疹,现在这个数字是几十万.总之,在这张图表中,如果你让数字继续下去,就有可能利用新疫苗技术为儿童提供疫苗.我们可以加快这个进程.Becausewebuiltthisthingtogetherfromthebeginning,it'sthisgreatpartn ership.IhadthatwithPaulAllenintheearlydaysofMicrosoft.IhaditwithSteve BallmerasMicrosoftgotbigger,andnowMelinda,andinevenstronger,equalways ,isthepartner,sowetalkalotaboutwhichthingsshouldwegivemoreto,whichgro upsareworkingwellShe'sgotalotofinsight.She'llsitdownwiththeemployeesa lot.We'lltakethedifferenttripsshedescribed.Sothere'salotofcollaborati on.Ican'tthinkofanythingwhereoneofushadasuperstrongopinionaboutonethi ngoranother因为我们从零开始建立了它,这是一种绝妙的伙伴关系.微软早期,我曾和保罗·艾伦有那种伙伴关系.微软的成长期我有史蒂夫·巴摩,现在微软更强了,梅琳达以一种更稳固,更平等的方式成为了我的伙伴.我们谈论了很多,哪些事情更应该重视,哪一个团队运作的很好？她有很多深刻见解.她能和员工打成一片.我们各自出行,就像她说的,我们也有很多合作.我想不出有哪件事一方的主张特别强烈.Well,Iwouldsayahugelessonforusoutoftheearlyworkiswethoughtthatthesesm allschoolsweretheanswer,andsmallschoolsdefinitelyhelp.Theybringdownth edropoutrate.Theyhavelessviolenceandcrimeinthoseschools.Butthethingth atwelearnedfromthatwork,andwhatturnedouttobethefundamentalkey,isagrea tteacherinfrontoftheclassroom.Ifyoudon'thaveaneffectiveteacherinthefr ontoftheclassroom,Idon'tcarehowbigorsmallthebuildingis,you'renotgoing tochangethetrajectoryofwhetherthatstudentwillbereadyforcollege.我想说的是一个深刻的教训,工作早期,我们以为小规模的学校就是解决办法,当然小规模学校有一定作用,可以减少辍学率.学校内的暴力事件和犯罪比较低.但是我们从工作中学到的,也是最重要的一件事就是课堂上必须有个好老师.如果没有有效率的老师,无论教室大或小,你都不可能改变学生是否已经准备好上大学的轨迹.。
比尔盖茨演讲稿英文回答：My fellow global citizens,。
Today, I stand before you to share my thoughts on the challenges and opportunities facing our world.As you know, we live in an interconnected and interdependent global community. The actions of one nation can have far-reaching consequences for others. We are all part of a shared human family, and we must work together to build a better future for all.One of the most pressing challenges we face is thethreat of climate change. The scientific evidence is clear: human activities are warming the planet at an alarming rate. If we do not take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the consequences will be devastating.We are already seeing the effects of climate change all around us. Extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and more severe. Sea levels are rising, threatening coastal communities. And many species of plants and animals are being forced to adapt to a changing climate or face extinction.The good news is that we still have time to act. We have the knowledge and the technology to transition to a clean energy economy. We can invest in renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind power. We can make our homes and businesses more energy-efficient. And we can develop new technologies to capture and store carbon dioxide.Another major challenge we face is the rise of inequality. In many countries, the gap between the rich and the poor is growing wider. This is not only a moral issue, but it is also a threat to our economic stability.When people do not have access to quality education, healthcare, and other basic services, they are less likelyto be able to contribute to their communities and economies. This can lead to social unrest and political instability.We need to work together to create a more just and equitable world. We need to invest in education and healthcare. We need to create jobs that pay a living wage. And we need to make sure that everyone has access to affordable housing and other basic necessities.In addition to these challenges, we also have many opportunities to make the world a better place. We have the opportunity to end poverty and hunger. We have the opportunity to provide everyone with access to quality education and healthcare. And we have the opportunity to create a more sustainable and just world for all.These are ambitious goals, but they are achievable. If we work together, we can build a better future forourselves and for generations to come.中文回答：全球公民们，。
比尔盖茨谈成功演讲稿（精选4篇）以下是网友分享的关于比尔盖茨谈成功演讲稿的资料4篇，希望对您有所帮助，就爱阅读感谢您的支持。
篇一：比尔盖茨成功曾经有人问比尔。
盖次成功的秘决，比尔。
盖次说：因为有更多的成功人士在为我工作。
陈安之的超级成功学也提到：先为成功的人工作，再与成功的人合作，最后让成功的人为你工作。
目前与成功的人合作，是我最喜欢和最欣赏的。
我也力图借助一个宽松的环境和积极的团队，与更多的人公平合作，以便在未来替自己经营一个抵抗风险的事业。
我认为一个想卓越的人总是希望与他合作的人有以下几个特点：一是不满足。
二十一世纪最大的危机是没有危机感，最大的陷阱是满足。
人要学会用望远镜看世界，而不是用近视眼看世界。
顺境时要想着为自己找个退路，逆境时要懂得为自己找出路。
二是学习力强。
学历代表过去，学习力却掌握将来。
因此我希望与我合作者懂得从任何的细节、所有的人身上学习和感悟，并且要懂得举一反三。
主要的是要懂得，学习其实是学与习两个字，学一次，做一百次，才能真正掌握。
学、做、教是一个完整的过程，只有达到教的程度，才算真正吃透。
而且在更多的时候，学习是一种态度。
只有谦卑的人，才真正能学到东西。
大海之所以成为大海，是因为它比所有的河流都低。
三是行动力强。
只有行动才会有结果。
行动不一样，结果才不一样。
知道了不去做，等于不知道；做了没有结果，等于没有做。
不犯错误，一定会错，因为不犯错误的人一定没有尝试。
错了不要紧，一定要善于总结，然后再做，一直到正确的结果出来为止。
四是要懂得付出。
要想杰出，一定得先付出。
斤斤计较的人，一生只得两斤。
没有点奉献精神，是不可能创业的。
要先用行动让别人知道，你有超过所得的价值，别人才会开更高的价。
五是有强烈的沟通意识。
沟通无极限，这更是一种态度，而非一种技巧。
一个好的团队当然要有共同的愿景，非一日可以得来。
需要无时不在的沟通，从目标到细节，甚至到家庭等等，都在沟通的内容之列。
六是诚恳大方。
比尔盖茨ted演讲稿比尔盖茨ted演讲稿的人服务。
当初和保罗创立微软之时，我们的目标是把计算机和软件的力量普及到普通大众，这便是我们当时的说法。
在早期的一本书上的封面有一个上扬的拳头，他们称之为《计算机解放》。
At tha t time, only b ig busi nessescould b uy pute rs.We w anted t o offer the sa me powe r to re gular p eople a nd demo cratize puting。
在那个时候，只有大企业才能购置计算机。
我们想让这种计算机设备普及到社会大众并让计算机民主化。
By the 1990s, we saw ho wprofo undly p ersonal puters couldempower people, but t hat suc cess cr eated a new di lemma.I f richkids go t puter s and p oor kid s didnt, then techno logy wo uld mak e inequ ality w orse.Th at rancounter to our core b elief。
在上个世纪90年代，我们目睹了个人电脑对人们的巨大效用，但是这种成功同时造成了新的困局。
如果富人的孩子拥有计算机而穷人的孩子却不能时，这种科技会加剧不平等。
而这与我们的核心理念相抵触。
Technol ogy sho uld ben efit ev eryone。
科技应当惠及万众。
So we worked to clo se thedigital divide. I mad e it apriorit y at Mi crosoft, and M elindaand I m ade itan earl y prior ity atour Fou ndation. Donat ingper sonal p uters t o publi c libra ries to make s ure tha t every one had access。
比尔盖茨t ed演讲稿的人服务。
当初和保罗创立微软之时，我们的目标是把计算机和软件的力量普及到普通大众，这便是我们当时的说法。
在早期的一本书上的封面有一个上扬的拳头，他们称之为《计算机解放》。
Att ha tti me,on lyb igb us in es se sco ul dbu ypu te rs.W ewa nt edt oof fe rth esa mep ow ert ore gu la rpe op lea ndd em oc ra ti zep ut in g。
在那个时候，只有大企业才能购置计算机。
我们想让这种计算机设备普及到社会大众并让计算机民主化。
Byt he1990s,wes awh owp ro fo un dl ype rs on alp ut er sco ul dem po we rpe op le,bu tth ats uc ce ssc re at edan ewd il em ma.I fri chk id sgo tpu te rsa ndp oo rki dsd id nt,t he nte ch no lo gyw ou ldm ak ein eq ua li tyw or se.T ha tra nco un te rtoo urc or ebe li ef。
Bill Gates 2010年TED演讲稿I'm going to talk today about energy and climate. And that might seem a bit surprising because my full-time work at the foundation is mostly about vaccines and seeds,about the things that we need to invent and deliverto help the poorest two billion live better lives.But energy and climate are extremely important to these people,in fact, more important than to anyone else on the planet.The climate getting worse, means that many years their crops won't grow.There will be too much rain, not enough rain. Things will change in waysthat their fragile environment simply can't support.And that leads to starvation. It leads to uncertainty. It leads to unrest.So, the climate changes will be terrible forthem.Also, the price of energy is very important to them.In fact, if you could pick just one thing to lower the price of,to reduce poverty, by far, you would pick energy. Now, the price of energy has come down over time.Really, advanced civilization is based on advances in energy.The coal revolution fueled the industrial revolution,and, even in the 1900's we've seen a very rapid decline in the price of electricity,and that's why we have refrigerators, air-conditioning,we can make modern materials and do so many things.And so, we're in a wonderful situation with electricity in the rich world.But, as we make it cheaper -- and let's go for making it twice as cheap --we need to meet a new constraint,and that constraint has to do with CO2.CO2 is warming the planet,and the equation on CO2is actually a very straightforward one.If you sum up the CO2 that gets emitted,that leads to a temperature increase,and that temperature increase leads to some very negative effects.The effects on the weather and, perhaps worse, the indirect effects,in that the natural ecosystems can't adjust to these rapid changes,and so you get ecosystem collapses.Now, the exact amount of how you mapfrom a certain increase of CO2to what temperature will beand where the positive feedbacks are,there's some uncertainty there, but not very much.And there's certainly uncertainty about how bad those effects will be,but they will be extremely bad.I asked the top scientists on this several times, do we really have to get down to near zero? Can't we just cut it in half or a quarter?And the answer is that, until we get near to zero,the temperature will continue to rise.And so that's a big challenge.It's very different than saying we're a 12 ft high truck trying to get under a 10 ft bridge, and we can just sort of squeeze under.This is something that has to get to zero. Now, we put out a lot of carbon dioxide every year,over 26 billion tons.For each American, it's about 20 tons.For people in poor countries, it's less than one ton.It's an average of about five tons for everyone on the planet.And, somehow, we have to make changesthat will bring that down to zero.It's been constantly going up.It's only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all,so we have to go from rapidly risingto falling, and falling all the way to zero. This equation has four factors.A little bit of multiplication.So, you've got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero,and that's going to be based on the number of people,the services each person's using on average, the energy on average for each service,and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So, let's look at each one of theseand see how we can get this down to zero. Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.Now that's back from high school algebra,but let's take a look.First we've got population.Now, the world today has 6.8 billion people.That's headed up to about nine billion.Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services,we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent,but there we see an increase of about 1.3.The second factor is the services we use.This encompasses everything,the food we eat, clothing, TV, heating.These are very good things,and getting rid of poverty means providing these servicesto almost everyone on the planet.And it's a great thing for this number to go up.In the rich world, perhaps the top one billion, we probably could cut back and use less,but every year, this number, on average, is going to go up,and so, over all, that will more than double the services delivered per person.Here we have a very basic service.Do you have lighting in your house to be able to read your homework,and, in fact, these kids don't, so they're going outand reading their school work under the street lamps.Now, efficiency, E, the energy for each service, here, finally we have some good news.We have something that's not going up.Through various inventions and new ways of doing lighting,through different types of cars, different ways of building buildings.there are a lot of services where you can bring the energy for that service down quite substantially,some individual services even, bring it down by 90 percent.There are other services like how we make fertilizer,or how we do air transport,where the rooms for improvement are far, farless.And so, overall here, if we're optimistic,we may get a reduction of a factor of three to even, perhaps, a factor of six.But for these first three factors now,we've gone from 26 billion to, at best, maybe 13 billion tons,and that just won't cut it.So let's look at this fourth factor --this is going to be a key one --and this is the amount of CO2 put out per each unit of energy.And so the question is, can you actually get that to zero?If you burn coal, no.If you burn natural gas, no.Almost every way we make electricity today, except for the emerging renewables and nuclear, puts out CO2.And so, what we're going to have to do at a global scale,is create a new system.And so, we need energy miracles.Now, when I use the term miracle, I don't mean something that's impossible.The microprocessor is a miracle. The personal computer is a miracle.The internet and its services are a miracle. So, the people here have participated in the creation of many miracles.Usually, we don't have a deadline,where you have to get the miracle by a certain date.Usually, you just kind of stand by, and some come along, some don't.This is a case where we actually have to drive full speedand get a miracle in a pretty tight time line. Now, I thought, how could I really capture this? Is there some kind of natural illustration, some demonstration that would grab people's imagination here?I thought back to a year ago when I brought mosquitos,and somehow people enjoyed that.(Laughter)It really got them involved in the idea of,you know, there are people who live with mosquitos.So, with energy, all I could come up with is this.I decided that releasing fireflieswould be my contribution to the environment here this year.So here we have some natural fireflies.I'm told they don't bite, in fact, they might not even leave that jar.(Laughter)Now, there's all sorts gimmicky solutions like that one,but they don't really add up to much.We need solutions, either one or several,that have unbelievable scaleand unbelievable reliability,and, although there's many directions people are seeking,I really only see five that can achieve the big numbers.I've left out tide, geothermal, fusion, biofuels.Those may make some contribution,and if they can do better than I expect, so much the better,but my key point hereis that we're going to have to work on each of these five,and we can't give up any of them because they look daunting,because they all have significant challenges. Let's look first at the burning fossil fuels, either burning coal or burning natural gas. What you need to do there, seems like it might be simple, but it's not,and that's to take all the CO2, after you've burned it, going out the flue,pressurize it, create a liquid, put it somewhere,and hope it stays there.Now we have some pilot things that do this at the 60 to 80 percent level,but getting up to that full percentage, that will be very tricky,and agreeing on where these CO2quantities should be put will be hard,but the toughest one here is this long term issue.Who's going to be sure?Who's going to guarantee something that is literally billions of times largerthan any type of waste you think of in terms of nuclear or other things?This is a lot of volume.So that's a tough one.Next, would be nuclear.It also has three big problems.Cost, particularly in highly regulated countries, is high.The issue of the safety, really feeling good about nothing could go wrong,that, even though you have these humanoperators,that the fuel doesn't get used for weapons. And then what do you do with the waste?And, although it's not very large, there are a lot of concerns about that.People need to feel good about it.So three very tough problems that might be solvable,and so, should be worked on.The last three of the five, I've grouped together.These are what people often refer to as the renewable sources.And they actually -- although it's great they don't require fuel --they have some disadvantages.One is that the density of energy gathered in these technologiesis dramatically less than a power plant.This is energy farming, so you're talking about many square miles,thousands of time more area than you think ofas a normal energy plant.Also, these are intermittent sources.The sun doesn't shine all day, it doesn't shine every day,and, likewise, the wind doesn't blow all the time.And so, if you depend on these sources,you have to have some way of getting the energy during those time periods that it's not available.So, we've got big cost challenges here.We have transmission challenges.For example, say this energy source is outside your country,you not only need the technology,but you have to deal with the risk of the energy coming from elsewhere.And, finally, this storage problem.And, to dimensionalize this, I went through and looked atall the types of batteries that get made,for cars, for computers, for phones, forflashlights, for everything,and compared that to the amount of electrical energy the world uses,and what I found is that all the batteries we make nowcould store less than 10 minutes of all the energy.And so, in fact, we need a big breakthrough here,something that's going to be a factor of a hundred betterthan the approaches we have now.It's not impossible, but it's not a very easy thing.Now, this shows up when you try to get the intermittent sourceto be above, say, 20 to 30 percent of what you're using.If you're counting on it for 100 percent,you need an incredible miracle battery.Now, how we're going to go forward on this: what's the right approach?Is it a Manhattan project? What's the thing that can get us there?Well, we need lots of companies working on this, hundreds.In each of these five paths, we need at least a hundred people.And a lot of them, you'll look at and say they're crazy. That's good.And, I think, here in the TED group,we have many people who are already pursuing this.Bill Gross has several companies, including one called e-Solarthat has some great solar thermal technologies. Vinod Khosla's investing in dozens of companies that are doing great things and have interesting possibilities,and I'm trying to help back that.Nathan Myhrvold and I actually are backing a companythat, perhaps surprisingly, is actually taking the nuclear approach.There are some innovations in nuclear: modular, liquid.And innovation really stopped in this industry quite some ago,so the idea that there's some good ideas laying around is not all that surprising.The idea of Terrapower is that, instead of burning a part of uranium,the one percent, which is the U235,we decided, let's burn the 99 percent, the U238. It is kind of a crazy idea.In fact, people had talked about it for a long time,but they could never simulate properly whether it would work or not,and so it's through the advent of modern supercomputersthat now you can simulate and see that, yes, with the right material's approach, this looks like it would work.And, because you're burning that 99 percent, you have greatly improved cost profile.You actually burn up the waste, and you can actually use as fuelall the leftover waste from today's reactors. So, instead of worrying about them, you just take that. It's a great thing.It breathes this uranium as it goes along. So it's kind of like a candle.You can see it's a log there, often referred to as a traveling wave reactor.In terms of fuel, this really solves the problem. I've got a picture here of a place in Kentucky. This is the left over, the 99 percent,where they've taken out the part they burn now, so it's called depleted uranium.That would power the U.S. for hundreds of years. And, simply by filtering sea water in an inexpensive process,you'd have enough fuel for the entire lifetime of the rest of the planet.So, you know, it's got lots of challenges ahead, but it is an example of the many hundreds and hundreds of ideasthat we need to move forward.So let's think, how should we measure ourselves? What should our report card look like?Well, let's go out to where we really need to get,and then look at the intermediate.For 2050, you've heard many people talk about this 80 percent reduction.That really is very important, that we get there. And that 20 percent will be used up by things going on in poor countries,still some agriculture.Hopefully, we will have cleaned up forestry, cement.So, to get to that 80 percent,the developed countries, including countries like China,will have had to switch their electricity generation altogether.So, the other grade is, are we deploying this zero-emission technology,have we deployed it in all the developedcountriesand we're in the process of getting it elsewhere. That's super important.That's a key element of making that report card. So, backing up from there, what should the 2020 report card look like?Well, again, it should have the two elements. We should go through these efficiency measures to start getting reductions.The less we emit, the less that sum will be of CO2,and, therefore, the less the temperature.But in some ways, the grade we get there,doing things that don't get us all the way to the big reductions,is only equally, or maybe even slightly less, important than the other,which is the piece of innovation on these breakthroughs.These breakthroughs, we need to move those at full speed,and we can measure that in terms of companies,pilot projects, regulatory things that have been changed.There's a lot of great books that have been written about this.The Al Gore book, "Our Choice"and the David McKay book, "Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air."They really go through it and create a framework that this can be discussed broadly,because we need broad backing for this.There's a lot that has to come together.So this is a wish.It's a very concrete wish that we invent this technology.If you gave me only one wish for the next 50 years,I could pick who's president,I could pick a vaccine, which is something I love,or I could pick that this thingthat's half the cost with no CO2 gets invented, this is the wish I would pick.This is the one with the greatest impact.If we don't get this wish,the division between the people who think short term and long term will be terrible,between the U.S. and China, between poor countries and rich,and most of all the lives of those two billion will be far worse.So, what do we have to do?What am I appealing to you to step forward and drive?We need to go for more research funding.When countries get together in places like Copenhagen,they shouldn't just discuss the CO2.They should discuss this innovation agenda,and you'd be stunned at the ridiculously low levels of spendingon these innovative approaches.We do need the market incentives, CO2 tax, cap and trade,something that gets that price signal out there.We need to get the message out.We need to have this dialogue be a more rational, more understandable dialogue,including the steps that the government takes. This is an important wish, but it is one I think we can achieve.Thank you.(Applause)Thank you.Chris Anderson: Thank you. Thank you.(Applause)Thank you. Just so I understand more about Terrapower, right --I mean, first of all, can you give a sense of what scale of investment this is?Bil Gates: To actually do the software, buy the supercomputer,hire all the great scientists, which we've done, that's only tens of millions,and even once we test our materials out in a Russian reactorto make sure our materials work properly,then you'll only be up in the hundreds of millions.The tough thing is building the pilot reactor, finding the several billion, finding the regulator, the locationthat will actually build the first one of these. Once you get the first one built, if it works as advertised,then it's just clear as day, because the economics, the energy density,are so different than nuclear as we know it. CA: And so, to understand it right, this involves building deep into the groundalmost like a vertical kind of column of nuclear fuel,of this sort of spent uranium,and then the process starts at the top and kind of works down?BG: That's right. Today, you're always refueling the reactor,so you have lots of people and lots of controls that can go wrong,that thing where you're opening it up and moving things in and out.That's not good.So, if you have very cheap fuel that you can put 60 years in --just think of it as a log --put it down and not have those same complexities. And it just sits there and burns for the sixty years, and then it's done.CA: It's a nuclear power plant that is its own waste disposal solution.BG: Yeah. Well, what happens with the waste, you can let it sit there -- there's a lot less waste under this approach --then you can actually take that,and put it into another one and burn that.And we start off actually by taking the waste that exists today,that's sitting in these cooling pools or dry casking by reactor.That's our fuel to begin with.So, the thing that's been a problem from thosereactorsis actually what gets fed into ours,and you're reducing the volume of the waste quite dramaticallyas you're going through this process.CA: But in your talking to different people around the worldabout the possibilities here,where is there most interest in actually doing something with this?BG: Well, we haven't picked a particular place, and there's all these interesting disclosure rules about anything that's called nuclear,so we've got a lot of interest,that people from the company have been in Russia, India, China.I've been back seeing the secretary of energy here,talking about how this fits into the energy agenda.So I'm optimistic. You know the French and Japanese have done some work.This is a variant on something that has been done.It's an important advance, but it's like a fast reactor,and a lot of countries have built them,so anybody who's done a fast reactor, is a candidate to be where the first one gets built. CA: So, in your mind, timescale and likelihood of actually taking something like this live? BG: Well, we need, for one of these high-scale, electro-generation thingsthat's very cheap,we have 20 years to invent and then 20 years to deploy.That's sort of the deadline that the environmental modelshave shown us that we have to meet.And, you know, Terrapower, if things go well, which is wishing for a lot,could easily meet that.And there are, fortunately now, dozens of companies,we need it to be hundreds,who, likewise, if their science goes well,if the funding for their pilot plants goes well, that they can compete for this.And it's best if multiple succeed,because then you could use a mix of these things. We certainly need one to succeed.CA: In terms of big-scale possible game changes, is this the biggest that you're aware of out there?BG: An energy breakthrough is the most important thing.It would have been, even without the environmental constraint,but the environmental constraint just makes it so much greater.In the nuclear space, there are other innovators.You know, we don't know their work as well as we know this one,but the modular people, that's a different approach.There's a liquid type reactor, which seems a little hard,but maybe they say that about us.And so, there are different ones,but the beauty of this is a molecule of uranium has a million times as much energy as a molecule of, say, coal,and so, if you can deal with the negatives, which are essentially the radiation,the footprint and cost, the potential,in terms of effect on land and various things, is almost in a class of its own.CA: If this doesn't work, then what?Do we have to start taking emergency measuresto try and keep the temperature of the earth stable?BG: If you get into that situation,it's like if you've been over-eating, and you're about to have a heart-attack.Then where do you go? You may need heart surgery or something.There is a line of research on what's calledgeoengineering,which are various techniques that would delay the heatingto buy us 20 or 30 years to get our act together. Now, that's just an insurance policy.You hope you don't need to do that.Some people say you shouldn't even work on the insurance policybecause it might make you lazy,that you'll keep eating because you know heart surgery will be there to save you.I'm not sure that's wise, given the importance of the problem,but there's now the geoengineering discussion about, should that be in the back pocket in case things happen faster,or this innovation goes a lot slower than we expect.CA: Climate skeptics: if you had a sentence or two to say to them,how might you persuade them that they're wrong? BG: Well, unfortunately, the skeptics come indifferent camps.The ones who make scientific arguments are very few.Are they saying there's negative feedback effectsthat have to do with clouds that offset things? There are very, very few things that they can even saythere's a chance in a million of those things. The main problem we have here is kind of like AIDS.You make the mistake now, and you pay for it a lot later.And so, when you have all sorts of urgent problems,the idea of taking pain now that has to do with a gain later --and a somewhat uncertain pain thing.In fact, the IPCC report, that's not necessarily the worst case,and there are people in the rich world who look at IPCCand say, okay, that isn't that big of a deal. The fact is it's that uncertain part that should move us towards this.But my dream here is that, if you can make it economic,and meet the CO2 constraints,then the skeptics say, okay,I don't care that it doesn't put out CO2,I kind of wish it did put out CO2but I guess I'll accept it because it's cheaper than what's come before.(Applause)CA: And so, that would be your response to the Bjorn Lomborg argument,that basically if you spend all this energy trying to solve the CO2 problem,it's going to take away all your other goalsof trying to rid the world of poverty and malaria and so forth,[that] it's a stupid waste of the Earth's resources to put money towards thatwhen there are better things we can do.BG: Well, the actual spending on the R&D piece --say the U.S. should spend 10 billion a year more than it is right now --it's not that dramatic.It shouldn't take away from other things.The thing you get into big money on, and this, reasonable people can disagree,is when you have something that's non-economic and you're trying to fund that.That, to me, mostly is a waste.Unless you're very close and you're just funding the learning curveand it's going to get very cheap.I believe we should try more things that havea potentialto be far less expensive.If the trade-off you get into is, let's make energy super expensive,then the rich can afford that.I mean, all of us here could pay five times as much for our energyand not change our lifestyle.The disaster is for that two billion.And even Lomborg has changed.His shtick now is, why isn't the R&D getting discussed more.He's still, because of his earlier stuff,still associated with the skeptic camp,but he's realized that's a pretty lonely camp, and so, he's making the R&D point.And so there is a thread of something that I think is appropriate.The R&D piece, it's crazy how little it's funded. CA: Well Bill, I suspect I speak on the behalf of most people hereto say, I really hope your wish comes true. Thank you so much.BG: Thank you.(Applause)。
比尔盖茨演讲稿演讲稿怎么写，欢迎阅读小编整理提供的比尔盖茨演讲稿。
比尔盖茨演讲稿【一】I've always been an optimist and I supposed that is rooted in my belief that the power of creativity and intelligence can make the world a better place.我天生乐观，坚信人类凭创造力和聪明才智可以让世界日益美妙，这一设想一直根植于我的内心深处。
For as long as I can remember, I've loved learning new things and solving problems. So when I sat down at a computer for the first time in seventh grade, I was hooked. It's was a clunky and teletype machine that barely do anything compared to the computer we have today. But it changed my life.自从记事起，我就热衷于接触新事物、挑战难题。
可想而知，我上七年级时第一次坐在计算机前是何等着迷，如入无我之境。
那是一台锵锵作响的旧牌机器，和我们今天拥有的计算机相比，它相当逊色几乎一无所用，但正是它改变了我的生活。
When my friend Paul Allen and I stared Microsoft 30 years ago, we had a vision of "a computer on every desk and in every home," which probably sounded a little too optimistic at a time when most computers were the size of refrigerators. But we believe that personal computer would change the world. And they have.30 年前，我和朋友保罗·艾伦创办微软时，我们幻想实现"在每个家庭、在每张办公桌上都有一台计算机"，这在大多数的计算机体积如同冰箱的尺寸的年代，听起来有点异想天开。
比尔盖茨演讲稿英文回答：As I stand before you today, I am filled with a profound sense of gratitude. It was 46 years ago that I embarked on a journey that would forever change the course of my life and the world as we knew it. Together with my childhood friend Paul Allen, we founded a company that would become a symbol of innovation and technological advancement.From the humble beginnings in a garage in Albuquerque, New Mexico, to the global enterprise that it is today, Microsoft has been an integral part of my life. It has been a crucible for my dreams, aspirations, and relentless pursuit of making a meaningful impact on the world.My journey has been marked by both triumphs and tribulations. There were moments when our backs were against the wall and the future seemed uncertain. Yet,through it all, I have never wavered in my belief that technology has the power to solve some of the world's most pressing challenges and improve the lives of countless people.One of the most significant milestones in Microsoft's history was the release of the Windows operating system in 1985. This revolutionary software platform transformed the way people interacted with computers, making them more accessible and user-friendly. It was a pivotal moment that not only changed the trajectory of our company but also ushered in a new era of computing.As Microsoft grew, so too did our commitment to social responsibility. We recognized that we had a unique opportunity to use our resources and expertise to make a positive difference in the world. Through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, we have dedicated ourselves to fighting poverty, disease, and inequality.Today, the foundation is one of the largest philanthropic organizations in the world, working in over130 countries. We have made significant progress in areas such as global health, education, and financial inclusion. But we know that there is still much more to be done.One of the most rewarding aspects of my life has beenthe opportunity to mentor and inspire young people. Ibelieve that every young person has the potential toachieve great things, regardless of their background or circumstances. Through my work with the Gates Foundation, I have had the privilege of meeting and working with some of the most talented and dedicated people in the world.I am particularly proud of the work we have done to empower women and girls. I believe that women are the keyto unlocking the potential of our world. When women have access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities, they can lift themselves and their families out of poverty and create a better future for all.As I reflect on my journey, I am filled with a deep sense of optimism for the future. Technology is advancingat an unprecedented pace, and I believe that it has thepotential to solve some of the world's most pressing challenges. From eradicating disease to combating climate change, I believe that technology can be a force for goodin the world.However, it is important to remember that technology is not a panacea. It is a tool that can be used for both good and evil. It is up to us to ensure that we use technology wisely and ethically.As we move forward, I believe that it is more important than ever to work together to build a more just and equitable world. We must continue to invest in education, healthcare, and other essential services that will help people reach their full potential. We must also work to reduce inequality and create opportunities for all.I am confident that if we work together, we can createa better future for ourselves and for generations to come.中文回答：今天站在你们面前，我感到无比荣幸。
比尔盖茨ted演讲TED(指technology, entertainment, design在英语中的缩写，即技术、娱乐、设计)是美国的一家私有非营利机构，该机构以它组织的TED大会著称，这个会议的宗旨是“值得传播的创意”。
TED诞生于1984年，其发起人是理查德·索·乌曼。
2001年起，克里斯·安德森接管TED，创立了种子基金会(The Sapling Foundation)，并运营TED大会。
下面小编为你介绍比尔盖茨在TED的演讲，希望能帮到你。
中英文演讲稿：Stanford University。
(斯坦福大学)BILL GATES: Congratulations, class of 2014!比尔·盖茨：2014届毕业生，祝贺你们顺利毕业(Cheers)。
(欢呼)Melinda and I are excited to be here. It would be a thrill for anyone to be invited to speak at a Stanford commencement, but it's especially gratifying for us. Stanford is rapidly becoming the favorite university for members of our family, and it's long been a favorite university for Microsoft and our foundation。
我和梅琳达怀着激动的心情与你们欢聚在此共贺毕业。
能受邀到斯坦福大学学位授予典礼上做演讲是一件让人激动的事，对我们而言，这尤为荣幸。
斯坦福大学正日渐成为我们家庭成员最喜爱的大学。
而长久以来，斯坦福也是微软以及比尔与梅琳达基金会最喜爱的一所大学。
”Our formula has been to get the smartest, most creative people working on the most important problems. It turns out that a disproportionate number of those people are at Stanford. (Cheers)。
