信赖性测试报告英文版

可靠性实验报告Reliability Test Report品质实验室声明THE DECLARATION OF QUALITYLABORATORYNO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / ) 1. 为提高产品质量，本实验室遵循科学、公正、准确的原则，为用户提供有效、迅速的服务。

Conducting scientifically, candidly and precisely, test service for improvingproduct quality is provided effectively and timely by this laboratory to our customers. 2. 报告无品质实验室专用图章无效。

The report is void without appropriative stamp of quality test laboratory.3. 报告涂改、部分复制无效。

The report is void if it is, in anyway, altered and/or copied.4. 本次试验结果仅适用于试验样品。

The results only apply to the device under test.5. 带*标记项目为非必要试验项目，若客户需要，可另外安排试验。

Items marked with * are unnecessary test items. If the customer needs, additional tests can be arranged.可靠性实验报告Reliability Test ReportNO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )附录一：试验/检测设备可焊性实验分项试验报告Solder ability SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 Conclusion高低温循环试验分项试验报告TEMP.Cycles Test SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 ConclusionPressure Cooker Test SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 ConclusionHigh Temperature Storage Test SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT 产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 ConclusionLOW Temperature Storage Test SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT 产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 Conclusion恒温恒湿试验分项试验报告Temperature&Humidity Test SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 Conclusion* 稳态温湿度偏压试验分项试验报告* Temperature Humidity Bias Test SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT 产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 Conclusion* 高加速温湿度应力试验分项试验报告* Highly Accelerated Stress Test SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT 产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 Conclusion* 高温工作寿命试验分项试验报告* High Temperature Operating Life SUB-ITEM TEST REPORT 产品&试验信息 Product&Test Information NO：SDC-D-PJ-22-B( / )检验情况 Inspection Description试验/检测设备 Test/Inspection Device结论 Conclusion。

4.0 Finish Appearance Requirements最终表面要求4.1 Color (ASTM D1729)颜色(ASTM D1729)Color specifications will be defined by the Industrial Design team (or its approved agent). Color tolerances will be specified in the Dell Color document (example in addendum). Finish color shall be determined from the piece part drawing or other applicable documents, and conform to the following spec: Dell Corporate Cosmetic Specification, P/N 6724U, “SPEC,DELL,COSMETIC,CORP-STD”.颜色规格将由工业设计团队(或其认可的代理机构)定义。

色彩公差将在戴尔色彩文件(如附录)中指定。

最终颜色应由零件图纸或其他适用的文件确定，并符合以下规格:戴尔公司外观标准，P /N 6724U，“戴尔外观企业标准”。

Applicator shall measure L*, a* and b* at the locations specified on the piece-part drawing or other applicable document as stipulated in the Dell Corporate Cosmetic Specification, 6724U. If the location is not specified, the locations shall be approved by Dell Mechanical Engineer.检验员应按零件图或戴尔公司外观标准6724U中规定的其他适用指定位置的文件，测量L *、a *和b *。

光宝科技股份有限公司 文件名称：信赖性测试评估准则信赖性测试评估准则 ( Reliability Review Guideline )1 目的：1.1 为确保产品设计的信赖性，以及加强产品在市场之竞争力，建立〝零件额定使用率〞 ( Component Stress Test ) 及〝机种预估寿命〞(MTBF Prediction) 之信赖性准则，用以为厂内设计验证之依据。

1.2 提早介入及加速产品之成熟度。

1.3 避免上市后之风险。

2. 范围： 凡是本公司电源事业部所开发之产品均适用之。

3. 权责：3.1 零件额定使用率 ( Component Stress Test ) 及机种预估寿命 (MTBF Prediction) 由信赖性 工程师负责测试，Component Stress De-rating 之定义由设计部及信赖性共同定义。

3.2 测试样品由设计工程师负责提供，且须经过Bench Test 测试，或有机种之验证报告。

3.3 信赖性完成之测试报告须会签设计部及其部门主管认可后，才可对外发行。

3.4 信赖性完成之测试报告文件，均须透过DOC 才能对外发行。

4. 参考标准：4.1. 零件额定使用率参考准则 ： ISO 9001 NPS-MD-P-013。

4.2. 机种预估寿命( MTBF )参考准则： MIL-STD-217F, Bellcore TR332 ISSUE 6。

5. 定义：MTBF ( Mean Time Between Failure ) ：平均间隔失效时间。

MTBF = 1/p λ(p λFAILURE RATE)610* HOURS 6. 作业流程图：6.1 信赖性测试评估作业流程图如 附件17. 作业内容：7.1 新产品导入会议 ( Kickoff Meeting )：7.1.1 新机种由业务主导之新产品会议中决定： 7.1.1.1. 决定样品 ( SAMPLE ) 及其它资料日期. 7.1.1.2. BLUE BOOK 发出之日期.7.1.1.3. 信赖性工程师应于EVT 阶段开始执行评估, 且必须于Pilot run PCB 修改定案之前完成零件额定使用率之测试与评估, 以符合量产及客户的需求。

可靠性试验报告Reliability test report□Low temperaturestorage test □低温储存试验Must be free from any abnormality in both the construction and characteristics after the relay is liftin a temperature of -30±2℃ for 2h and then in room temperature and humidity for 2h .将样品放入: -30±2 ℃的恒温箱中储存: 2 H, 恢复常温2 小时后机械及电气性能测试合格 .The sample quantity 试样数量: 2 PCS,Number of qualified 合格数量: 2 PCSUnqualified number 不合格数量: PCSBad description不良描述:■ Pass合格□ Fail不合格□ Glow-wire test □灼热丝试验In the sample of the environment temperature 15 to 35 DHS DHS C C, humidity 45% to 75% of theflammable test room within 24 h, after 30 s burning time test, the sample combustion duration less than2 s, dripping content not thin cotton paper.将样品在环境温度15 ºC到35 ºC，湿度45%到75%的易燃试验房间内放置24h, 试验中30s灼热时间后,样品持续燃烧时间不超过2s,滴落物不引燃薄棉纸.The sample quantity 试样数量: 2 PCS,Number of qualified 合格数量: 2 PCSUnqualified number 不合格数量: PCSBad description不良描述:■ Pass合格□ Fail不合格备注Double-layer thickness: 0.15 + / - 0.02 mm动簧片厚度: 0.15±0.02 mmB-180T ested by 测试:: 朱定锁 Checked by 审核: 吴婉珍Approved by 批准:。

可信性研究报告英语作文管用句子Credibility is a fundamental aspect of any research report as it directly impacts the reliability and trustworthiness of the findings presented. In the context of academic or professional research, establishing credibility is crucial to ensure that the conclusions drawn and the recommendations made are accepted and implemented by the intended audience. This essay delves into the various elements that contribute to the credibility of a research report, with a particular focus on the use of effective sentences.Firstly, the choice of language and the clarity of expression play a vital role in establishing credibility. The use of concise, well-structured sentences that convey the intended meaning without ambiguity is essential. Researchers should strive to employ language that is accessible to the target audience, avoiding overly technical jargon or convoluted phrasing. By using clear and straightforward sentences, the researcher demonstrates a command of the subject matter and a commitment to effective communication.Moreover, the incorporation of relevant and authoritative sources isa key factor in enhancing the credibility of a research report. Sentences that seamlessly integrate citations from reputable academic journals, industry publications, or expert opinions lend credibility to the arguments presented. These sentences should not merely regurgitate the information from the sources but rather synthesize and interpret the findings in a way that aligns with the overall research objectives. Skillfully crafted sentences that effectively incorporate and contextualize external sources showcase the researcher's thorough understanding of the topic and their ability to build a compelling case.Another crucial aspect of credibility is the consistent and appropriate use of research methodologies. Sentences that describe the research design, data collection techniques, and analytical procedures employed should be clear, concise, and well-justified. By providing a transparent account of the methodological approach, the researcher demonstrates the rigor and reliability of the study. Sentences that explain the rationale behind the chosen methods and acknowledge any limitations or potential biases further enhance the credibility of the research report.The presentation of findings and the interpretation of results are also critical in establishing credibility. Sentences that accurately and objectively present the research findings, without exaggeration or selective reporting, are essential. Researchers should strive to presentboth supportive and contradictory evidence, acknowledging the nuances and complexities inherent in the research topic. Sentences that offer balanced and well-reasoned interpretations of the results, drawing logical connections and highlighting the practical implications, will contribute to the overall credibility of the research report.Furthermore, the use of appropriate and well-structured sentences can help to ensure the coherence and logical flow of the research report. Transitional sentences that effectively link different sections or ideas, as well as sentences that provide clear signposting and organization, can enhance the readability and overall coherence of the document. By crafting sentences that guide the reader through the research process, the researcher demonstrates their ability to present a well-structured and cohesive argument.Finally, the tone and style of the sentences used in the research report can also impact its credibility. Sentences that maintain a professional, objective, and impartial tone, avoiding overly emotive or subjective language, can help to establish the researcher's credibility. Additionally, the consistent use of appropriate academic conventions, such as the consistent application of citation styles and the avoidance of colloquialisms or informal language, can further reinforce the credibility of the research report.In conclusion, the credibility of a research report is heavily influenced by the use of effective sentences. By employing clear, concise, and well-structured sentences that incorporate authoritative sources, describe rigorous research methodologies, present findings objectively, and maintain a professional tone, researchers can effectively communicate the reliability and trustworthiness of their work. The careful crafting of sentences is a crucial aspect of establishing credibility and ensuring that the research report is viewed as a valuable and credible contribution to the field of study.。