托福作文练习

托福考试写作练习及精选范文(26)TPO 35Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.文章：The Earth today faces many problems. Among these problems, the top three, i n some people's perspective, are probably global warming, pollution and energy crisis. All three, if we really look into them, can be connected with the perva sive use of private cars. It is because of this, I agree with the statement tha t there will be fewer cars in twenty years comparing with today.First of all, people will definitely use fewer cars. If we look at the glob al media, we are seeing an increasing consciousness on environmental problems. Be it the famous documentay by Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth, or the "Earth On e Hour" movement. They all indicate a global consensus: "We need to help the en vironment". So what's the easiest way to help? Using fewer cars. According to a survey conducted by the Ministry of Environmental Conservation in China, more than 40 percent of carbon dioxide produced by individuals are from private cars. If the trend of eco-friendly consciousness continues to grow in the next 20 ye ars, people will, without a doubt, use fewer and fewer cars. So, in a nutshell, the first reason why people will drive less in twenty years is because they wi ll be more environmentally-concerned.Another key aspect is that, in twenty years, there will be fewer people in the world. If there are fewer people in the world, of course there will be fewe r cars. If we are sensitive to global trends, we can see that a lot of countrie s in the world are facing a decrease in population. The biggest contributors to population growth, China and India, are also experiencing a decrease in the ra te of population increase. In 20 years, I am confident that there will be, without a doubt, fewer people in the world. In this case, there will be a decrease in the needs of transportation. So, it is logical to assume that there will be fewer cars in the world twenty years from now.A final argument I want to make is based on the ever developing technology. In the past twenty years, we have seen tremendous innovations taken place in t he field of transportation. From high-speed trains to cars that run on electric, there is simply no telling what might happen twenty years from now. Considerin g how much we have achieved in the past twenty years, it is not so improbable f or me to say that we might not even need cars in the near future. Who's to say that we won't be traveling on more efficient vehicles? Or maybe public transpor tation may become so convenient that we won't even consider using private trans portation ever again? The fact is, we cannot deny these possibilities for they are very likely to happen. In this light, I am definitely supportive of the vie w that there will be fewer cars in the future.From my arguments above, I think I am very optimistic about the future. I b elieve that, in twenty years, we will be living in a society with much fewer ca rs. And I am looking forward to that future.。

1.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Governments shouldspend more money on environment protection than on economic development.The issue of how environmental protection and economic development interrelate is highly debatable in recent years. Some people hold the view that the development of economy should be put on the first place for the growth of the city. Others maintain that governments should invest more in solving environmental issues in the long run. I agree with the latter opinion for the three reasons listed below.To begin with, a government is supposed to take it into account that a city’s development should be sustainable. That means environmental protection without which the progress of a city will come to an end is a crucial part of the city’s development. Take a chemical factory near my school for example. In the past, it would release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and pour waste directly into rivers, which contributed to global warming and lead to the contamination of the water source. As time went by, the environment near the factory ruined rapidly which completely prevented the factory from developing. As a result, the factory ended up with closing down. This could have been avoided if the factory realized the importance of environmental protection.Secondly, environmental protection which creates an eco-friendly area where residents’ mental health is well protected promotes the stability of the whole society. Obviously, without some degree of environmental sacrifice economic development can hardly be made. Thus, huge damage to the environment as well as human beings will be done as a result of the factories’and government’neglect. To be specific, factories that dump toxic waste into the surrounding region’s main water supply will cause disease and other health defects of the citizens living in the area. Furthermore, the local healthcare system is going to be burdened an increasing number of patients which results in a large cost of millions of dollars which could have been spent on further developing the economy. On the contrast, adequate environmental protection can make it possible for the whole natural and social system to develop in a more eco-friendly way.Lastly, by investing more in developing technology which is eco-friendly, governments can not only leave our next generation a better living place but promote the economic growth. Economists all agree that green technology which has been tapped by many developed countries has gained a competitive edge in the global economy market. Developed countries, such as the U.S.A, Germany have managed to get ahead of the competition and invest before the other developing countries come to their senses. Governments who want to strengthen their countries’competitive abilities are supposed not to ignore the importance of eco-friendly technology.As a rule, it is strongly recommended for governments allocate more funds toward environmental preservation rather than economic development.2.Do you agree or disagree with the statement that it is a waste of moneyfor governments fund to space travel orspace exploration?The issue of whether it is a waste of money for governments fund to space travel or space exploration is highly debatable in recent years. Some people hold the view that human should pay attention to the world outside the earth. Others maintain that there is no need to do what is wasting time and money. I agree with the latter opinion for the following reasons.To begin with, the money which is planned to be spent on space exploration by government is supposed to be spent on education which is in greater demand. As is known to all, education which is fundamental construction plays an essential role in the development of a country. This practice not only conforms to the interests of the majorities but also cultivate various talents for the further development of the country. Once the education of a country reaches a high level, the whole nation is on its highway to thrive. So we can easily come to the conclusion that education weighs more than studying space.Secondly, economy development which is as significant as education should be paid more attention than space exploration. For one thing, the boom of economy is goingto improve the living standard of the public, thus raising the educational level of the public. In other words, the better economy becomes, the better education will be. In that case, the importance of economy is self-evident. For another, the economy is able to raise the political status of a country. When a country manages to improve its economy, there is no doubt that its military might as well as commercial strength is getting stronger, which makes it possible for the country to gain respect from other countries. Therefore, the growth of economy is definitely more essential than space exploration.Admittedly, there are certain benefits of investing money in space exploration, such as developing new energy source and even finding an alternative home for human beings. However, compared with the reason provided for our viewpoint, these advantages seem lackluster. Therefore, I am still convinced that spending money on space exploration is a waste of money for government because governmental investment should be devoted to solving more pressing issues such as education and economy.3.The more money people have, the more they should give away for charity.Should those rich people who own more money than others donate part of their money to charity? Opinions vary widely. To some people, they regard the act of rich people’s giving away their money for charity as a kind of responsibility. Others hold the view that whether the wealthy is supposed to donate is decided by their own. Their money is at their own disposal. I agree with the former opinion for the reasons as follows.First and foremost, those people with greater wealth should give away their money partially in order to narrow the financial disparity between the poor and the rich, which results in the development of the social stability. As is known to all, the uneven distribution of wealth is the main factor causing the public to make complaints. Take a city near my hometown for example. There are a lots of luxury cars on the streets in the city which indicates a large number of rich people living here. However, at the same time, plenty of vagrants can be seen everywhere, whichsuggests the huge gap between the wealthy and the poor, thus making robbery rate high. Therefore, that the wealthy gives away their money to charity is of great importance.Secondly, the richer people can do a better job in charity, due to their better financial situation as well as their greater influence. Compared with people with lower income, the wealthier people are able to provide more money for those for those who are in need of help and have a greater effect on calling for the whole society to join in. The more money the wealthy owns, the less worried they will be after they do the donation. In other words, we can easily come to the conclusion that the better effect on the charity is made by those who have more money.Some people may assert that everyone has the right to distribute their own earnings. Nothing controls the will of those rich people. However, compared with the reasons provided for my standpoint, this view seems lackluster. The whole society needs some help to promote the social stability. Therefore, I am still convinced that people with more money should make more contribution to charity.4.Do you agree or disagree with the statement: Many people think thatathletes or celebrities that are from the entertainment business can change their careers to be politicians. Do you agree or disagree with this idea of profession change?Could athletes or celebrities who work in the entertainment field change their job to become politicians? Opinions vary widely. To some people, it is just fine and what they do is at their disposal. But others hold different view that political stuffs should not be hand over to those who are not professional. I agree with the latter opinion for the following reasons.1.名人不是专门做政治的，他们很难做好。

汇总托福写作独立练习题目.doc精品文档2023年12月17日托福写作自立题目：If your friend want to reduce living expenses, what would you suggest1. 找roommate 分担房租2. less frequency to buy smart phone3. buy less expensive food and cooking and home.2023年12月16日托福写作自立题目：Agree or disagree?The most important ways to improve the people’s health is to clean the enviroXXXent.2023年12月10日托福写作自立题目：Agree or disagree?Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past.2023年12月9日托福考试写作自立题目：Which one do you think is the most important for high school teacher (age from 15 to 18)1. the ability to give students advice to plan for their future;2. the ability to find which students need help and provide them with help;3. the ability to encourage students to learn on themselves outside of the classroom;2023年12月2日托福写作自立题目：Which way would you like to take to improve your health?A. eat more healthy food.B. do more exercises.C. reduce stress. 2023年11月26日托福自立写作题目：是否同意The food people ate in the past was healthier than the food people eat today.2023年11月25日托福写作真题题目：Do you agree or disagree the following statement: The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities.2023年11月18日自立写作题目：The goverXXXent can take a variety of actions to help protect the enviroXXXent.Which one of the following do you think is the most important for the nation’s goverXXXent to take to protect the enviroXXXent.1.Fund the research to develop enviroXXXentally friendly energy sources such as solar and wind energy.2.Preserve the natural places like forests and protect the animals that live there.3.Enforce laws to prevent the pollution of air and water by large companies.2023年11月12日自立写作题目：Older teenagers (16-19) should be allowed to work at paid part-time job or not.2023年11月11日托福写作真题题目：Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What’s your opinion? 2023年11月5日自立写作：University students are often encouraged to study fields in which significant job growth (a large increase in job opportunities) is expected; these fields currently include science, technology, engineering, and math, do you believe students should consider studying fields related to these subjects even if they are more interested in other subjects? Why or why not?2023年11月4日自立写作：High school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most。

Young people should take several different kinds o jobs before they take a career in a long term. young people 好处/坏处
should类 练习 解题
限制条件 解题思路 无
Young people should take several different kinds o jobs before they take a career in a long term. 好处/坏处
should类 练习
Young people should take several different kinds of jobs before they take a career in a long term. 主观点：不应该做不同工作。
should类 练习
Young people should take several different kinds of jobs before they take a career in a long term. 主观点：不应该做不同工作。 1. 直接选择一个长期职uld类 拆分法
Young people should take several different kinds of jobs before they take a career in a long term.
可拆分方向：专业/学生是否有目标
文章结构：
让步转折
文章结构：让步转折
让步段：不同意的观点 转折段：提出自己真正观点的正确性
所谓模板
让步段+拆分： Admittedly, by no means should we ignore the fact that +抄原题, especially for...