No 8-2 Finite time 1
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:167.49 KB
- 文档页数:8
Finitetimesynchronizationofchaoticsystems
ShihuaLi*,Yu-PingTian
DepartmentofAutomaticControl,SoutheastUniversity,Nanjing210096,PRChina
Accepted29April2002
Abstract
Usingfinitetimecontroltechniques,continuousstatefeedbackcontrollawsaredevelopedtosolvethesynchro-
nizationproblemoftwochaoticsystems.Wedemonstratethatthesetwochaoticsystemscanbesynchronizedinfinite
time.ExamplesofDuffingsystems,Lorenzsystemsarepresentedtoverifyourmethod.
Ó2002ElsevierScienceLtd.Allrightsreserved.
1.Introduction
Chaossynchronizationhasbeenofbroadinterestinrecentyears[1–7].In[1–5],activecontrolmethodswereusedto
solvethesynchronizationproblemofchaoticsystemssuchasRosslersystems,Lorenzsystems,Duffingsystems,Chen
systems.Themainideaofsynchronizationistousethestatesofthemastersystemtocontroltheslavesystemsothat
thestatesoftheslavesystemfollowsthestatesofthemastersystemasymptotically.Themastersystemandtheslave
systemmayhaveidenticalorcompletelydifferentstructures.Theconvergenceofthesynchronizationprocedurein[1–5]
isexponentialwithinfinitesettlingtime.
Toachievefasterconvergenceincontrolsystems,aneffectivemethodisusingfinitetimecontroltechniques.Finite
timestabilitymeanstheoptimalityinsettlingtime[8].Moreover,thefinitetimecontroltechniqueshavedemonstrated
betterrobustnessanddisturbancerejectionproperties[9].Theproblemwewanttodiscusshereisthatcanthesechaotic
systemsmentionedabovebesynchronizedinfinitesettlingtime?Theansweriscertain,whichwewilldemonstrateinthe
followingsections.
So,ourgoalinthispaperistodevelopfeedbackcontrollawstomakethesynchronizationprocedureconvergingin
finitetime,i.e.,thestatesoftheslavesystemfollowthestatesofthemastersysteminfinitetime.Discontinuousoropen-
loopcontroltechniquesfromfinitetimecontroltheorymaybeavailabletosolvethisproblem.However,considering
theconvenienceofcontinuouscontrollersinpracticalimplementationandtherobustnessofclosed-loopfeedbacksto
systemuncertainties,thefinitetimecontroltechniquewediscussedhereisbasedoncontinuousstatefeedbacks[8,9].
2.Finitetimesynchronizationofsecondorderchaoticsystems
Someresultsoffinitetimecontroltechniquesusingcontinuousfeedbacksaregivenin[8,9],andarerephrasedbythe
followingtwolemmas.
Lemma1([8,9]).Thesystem
dx
dt¼uð1Þ
*Tel.:+86-25-3794168;fax:+86-25-7712719.E-mailaddress:lsh@seu.edu.cn(S.Li).
0960-0779/03/$-seefrontmatterÓ2002ElsevierScienceLtd.Allrightsreserved.PII:S0960-0779(02)00100-
5Chaos,SolitonsandFractals15(2003)
303–310www.elsevier.com/locate/chaoscanbegloballystabilizedinfinitetimeunderthefeedbackcontrollaw
u¼ÀkÁsignðxÞjxjað2Þ
withk>0,a2ð0;1Þ.
Thesolutiontrajectoryof(1)and(2)is
xðtÞ1Àa¼xð0Þ1ÀaÀð1ÀaÞkt;xð0ÞP0
½ÀxðtÞ1Àa¼½Àxð0Þ1ÀaÀð1ÀaÞkt;xð0Þ<0
ð3Þ
ForanyinitialvalueofstatexðtÞatt¼0,i.e.,xð0Þ,itiseasilycomputedthatthesolutiontrajectoryof(1)and(2)will
reachx¼0infinitetimetsdeterminedbyts¼jxð0Þj1Àa=ð1ÀaÞk.
Lemma2([9]).Thesystem
dxðtÞ
dt¼vðtÞ;
dvðtÞ
dt¼uðtÞð4Þ
canbegloballystabilizedinfinitetimeunderthefeedbackcontrollaw
u¼Àk1signðxÞjxja1Àk2signðvÞjvja2ð5Þ
withk1,k2>0,a12ð0;1Þ,a2¼2a1=ð1þa1Þ.
Now,letusfirstconsiderthesynchronizationproblemofsecondorderchaoticsystemswhichcanbewritteninthe
followingform[3]
dx1ðtÞ
dt¼v1ðtÞ;
dv1ðtÞ
dt¼f1x1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tðÞð6Þ
wheref1ðx1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tÞisanonlinearfunction.Thissystemiscalledthemastersystem.Theequationsthatdescribethe
slavesystemare
dx2ðtÞ
dt¼v2ðtÞþu1ðtÞ;
dv2ðtÞ
dt¼f2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞþu2ðtÞð7Þ
wheref2ðx2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tÞisanonlinearfunctionandu1ðtÞ,u2ðtÞarethecontrolsignalstobedesigned.
Thedifferencebetweenthetwodistancesandthetwovelocitiesisdescribedby
x3¼x2Àx1;
v3¼v2Àv1:ð8Þ
Thus,weget
dx3ðtÞ
dt¼v3ðtÞþu1ðtÞ;
dv3ðtÞ
dt¼f2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞÀf1x1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tðÞþu2ðtÞð9Þ
Severalpossiblechoicesforthecontrolsignalsu1ðtÞ,u2ðtÞcanbetakentosynchronizetheslavesystemtothemaster
system.304S.Li,Y.-P.Tian/Chaos,SolitonsandFractals15(2003)303–3102.1.Controlstrategy1
Onepossiblechoiceisgivenby
u1ðtÞ¼Àv3ðtÞÀk1signðx3Þjx3ja;
u2ðtÞ¼Àf2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞþf1x1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tðÞ
Àk2signðv3Þjv3jb;k1;k2>0;a;b;2ð0;1Þ:ð10Þ
Bothsignalsu1ðtÞ,u2ðtÞareavailableinthesynchronizationprocedure.With(10),(9)canberewritteninthefollowingnotation:
dx3ðtÞ
dt¼Àk1signðx3Þjx3ja;
dv3ðtÞ
dt¼Àk2signðv3Þjv3jb;k1;k2>0;a;b2ð0;1Þ:ð11Þ
DuetoLemma1,(11)impliesthatthetwochaoticsystemsaresynchronizedwithcontinuousstatefeedbacksinfinite
time.
2.2.Controlstrategy2
Anotherpossiblechoiceisgivenby
u1ðtÞ¼0;
u2ðtÞ¼Àf2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞþf1ðx1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tÞÀk1signðx3Þjx3ja1
Àk2signðv3Þjv3ja2;k1;k2>0;a12ð0;1Þ;a2¼2a11þa1:ð12Þ
Here,onlycontrolsignalu2ðtÞismadeavailablewhileu1ðtÞ0.
With(12),thesystem(9)canberewritteninthefollowingnotation:
dx3ðtÞ
dt¼v3;
dv3ðtÞ
dt¼Àk1signðx3Þjx3ja1Àk2signðv3Þjv3ja2;k1;k2>0;a12ð0;1Þ;a2¼2a11þa1:ð13Þ
AccordingtoLemma2,thedifferenceswillconvergetozeroinfinitetime.
Example1(Duffingsystems).Asanexample,letusconsiderthesynchronizationoftwoDuffingsystems[3].The