No 8-2 Finite time 1

  • 格式:pdf
  • 大小:167.49 KB
  • 文档页数:8

Finitetimesynchronizationofchaoticsystems

ShihuaLi*,Yu-PingTian

DepartmentofAutomaticControl,SoutheastUniversity,Nanjing210096,PRChina

Accepted29April2002

Abstract

Usingfinitetimecontroltechniques,continuousstatefeedbackcontrollawsaredevelopedtosolvethesynchro-

nizationproblemoftwochaoticsystems.Wedemonstratethatthesetwochaoticsystemscanbesynchronizedinfinite

time.ExamplesofDuffingsystems,Lorenzsystemsarepresentedtoverifyourmethod.

Ó2002ElsevierScienceLtd.Allrightsreserved.

1.Introduction

Chaossynchronizationhasbeenofbroadinterestinrecentyears[1–7].In[1–5],activecontrolmethodswereusedto

solvethesynchronizationproblemofchaoticsystemssuchasRosslersystems,Lorenzsystems,Duffingsystems,Chen

systems.Themainideaofsynchronizationistousethestatesofthemastersystemtocontroltheslavesystemsothat

thestatesoftheslavesystemfollowsthestatesofthemastersystemasymptotically.Themastersystemandtheslave

systemmayhaveidenticalorcompletelydifferentstructures.Theconvergenceofthesynchronizationprocedurein[1–5]

isexponentialwithinfinitesettlingtime.

Toachievefasterconvergenceincontrolsystems,aneffectivemethodisusingfinitetimecontroltechniques.Finite

timestabilitymeanstheoptimalityinsettlingtime[8].Moreover,thefinitetimecontroltechniqueshavedemonstrated

betterrobustnessanddisturbancerejectionproperties[9].Theproblemwewanttodiscusshereisthatcanthesechaotic

systemsmentionedabovebesynchronizedinfinitesettlingtime?Theansweriscertain,whichwewilldemonstrateinthe

followingsections.

So,ourgoalinthispaperistodevelopfeedbackcontrollawstomakethesynchronizationprocedureconvergingin

finitetime,i.e.,thestatesoftheslavesystemfollowthestatesofthemastersysteminfinitetime.Discontinuousoropen-

loopcontroltechniquesfromfinitetimecontroltheorymaybeavailabletosolvethisproblem.However,considering

theconvenienceofcontinuouscontrollersinpracticalimplementationandtherobustnessofclosed-loopfeedbacksto

systemuncertainties,thefinitetimecontroltechniquewediscussedhereisbasedoncontinuousstatefeedbacks[8,9].

2.Finitetimesynchronizationofsecondorderchaoticsystems

Someresultsoffinitetimecontroltechniquesusingcontinuousfeedbacksaregivenin[8,9],andarerephrasedbythe

followingtwolemmas.

Lemma1([8,9]).Thesystem

dx

dt¼uð1Þ

*Tel.:+86-25-3794168;fax:+86-25-7712719.E-mailaddress:lsh@seu.edu.cn(S.Li).

0960-0779/03/$-seefrontmatterÓ2002ElsevierScienceLtd.Allrightsreserved.PII:S0960-0779(02)00100-

5Chaos,SolitonsandFractals15(2003)

303–310www.elsevier.com/locate/chaoscanbegloballystabilizedinfinitetimeunderthefeedbackcontrollaw

u¼ÀkÁsignðxÞjxjað2Þ

withk>0,a2ð0;1Þ.

Thesolutiontrajectoryof(1)and(2)is

xðtÞ1Àa¼xð0Þ1ÀaÀð1ÀaÞkt;xð0ÞP0

½ÀxðtÞ󰀉1Àa¼½Àxð0Þ󰀉1ÀaÀð1ÀaÞkt;xð0Þ<0󰀁

ð3Þ

ForanyinitialvalueofstatexðtÞatt¼0,i.e.,xð0Þ,itiseasilycomputedthatthesolutiontrajectoryof(1)and(2)will

reachx¼0infinitetimetsdeterminedbyts¼jxð0Þj1Àa=ð1ÀaÞk.

Lemma2([9]).Thesystem

dxðtÞ

dt¼vðtÞ;

dvðtÞ

dt¼uðtÞð4Þ

canbegloballystabilizedinfinitetimeunderthefeedbackcontrollaw

u¼Àk1signðxÞjxja1Àk2signðvÞjvja2ð5Þ

withk1,k2>0,a12ð0;1Þ,a2¼2a1=ð1þa1Þ.

Now,letusfirstconsiderthesynchronizationproblemofsecondorderchaoticsystemswhichcanbewritteninthe

followingform[3]

dx1ðtÞ

dt¼v1ðtÞ;

dv1ðtÞ

dt¼f1x1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tðÞð6Þ

wheref1ðx1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tÞisanonlinearfunction.Thissystemiscalledthemastersystem.Theequationsthatdescribethe

slavesystemare

dx2ðtÞ

dt¼v2ðtÞþu1ðtÞ;

dv2ðtÞ

dt¼f2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞþu2ðtÞð7Þ

wheref2ðx2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tÞisanonlinearfunctionandu1ðtÞ,u2ðtÞarethecontrolsignalstobedesigned.

Thedifferencebetweenthetwodistancesandthetwovelocitiesisdescribedby

x3¼x2Àx1;

v3¼v2Àv1:ð8Þ

Thus,weget

dx3ðtÞ

dt¼v3ðtÞþu1ðtÞ;

dv3ðtÞ

dt¼f2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞÀf1x1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tðÞþu2ðtÞð9Þ

Severalpossiblechoicesforthecontrolsignalsu1ðtÞ,u2ðtÞcanbetakentosynchronizetheslavesystemtothemaster

system.304S.Li,Y.-P.Tian/Chaos,SolitonsandFractals15(2003)303–3102.1.Controlstrategy1

Onepossiblechoiceisgivenby

u1ðtÞ¼Àv3ðtÞÀk1signðx3Þjx3ja;

u2ðtÞ¼Àf2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞþf1x1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tðÞ

Àk2signðv3Þjv3jb;k1;k2>0;a;b;2ð0;1Þ:ð10Þ

Bothsignalsu1ðtÞ,u2ðtÞareavailableinthesynchronizationprocedure.With(10),(9)canberewritteninthefollowingnotation:

dx3ðtÞ

dt¼Àk1signðx3Þjx3ja;

dv3ðtÞ

dt¼Àk2signðv3Þjv3jb;k1;k2>0;a;b2ð0;1Þ:ð11Þ

DuetoLemma1,(11)impliesthatthetwochaoticsystemsaresynchronizedwithcontinuousstatefeedbacksinfinite

time.

2.2.Controlstrategy2

Anotherpossiblechoiceisgivenby

u1ðtÞ¼0;

u2ðtÞ¼Àf2x2ðtÞ;v2ðtÞ;tðÞþf1ðx1ðtÞ;v1ðtÞ;tÞÀk1signðx3Þjx3ja1

Àk2signðv3Þjv3ja2;k1;k2>0;a12ð0;1Þ;a2¼2a11þa1:ð12Þ

Here,onlycontrolsignalu2ðtÞismadeavailablewhileu1ðtÞ󰀋0.

With(12),thesystem(9)canberewritteninthefollowingnotation:

dx3ðtÞ

dt¼v3;

dv3ðtÞ

dt¼Àk1signðx3Þjx3ja1Àk2signðv3Þjv3ja2;k1;k2>0;a12ð0;1Þ;a2¼2a11þa1:ð13Þ

AccordingtoLemma2,thedifferenceswillconvergetozeroinfinitetime.

Example1(Duffingsystems).Asanexample,letusconsiderthesynchronizationoftwoDuffingsystems[3].The