国际经济学第三章答案
- 格式:docx
- 大小:92.90 KB
- 文档页数:6
百度文库 - 让每个人平等地提升自我
6 Chapter 3
1.Home has 1200 units of labor available. It can produce two goods, apples and bananas.
The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2.
a.Graph out the production possibilities frontier:
b.What is the opportunity cost of apples in terms of bananas?
5.1LbLaaa
c.In the absence of trade, what would the price of apples in terms of bananas be?
In the absence of trade, since labor is the only factor of production and supply decisions are
determined by the attempts of individuals to maximize their earnings in a competitive
economy, only when LbLaba/aa /PPwill both goods be produced. So 1.5 /PPba
2.Home is as described in problem 1. There is now also another country, Foreign, with a
labor force of 800. Foreign’s unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in
banana production it is 1.
a.Graph Foreign’s production possibilities frontier:
b.Construct the world relative supply curve. 0200400600800200400600800QbananaQapple Home's PPF
0200400600800100080160240320400Q*bananaQ*apple Foreign's PPF 百度文库 - 让每个人平等地提升自我
6
3.Now suppose world relative demand takes the following form: Demand for apples/demand
for bananas = price of bananas/price of apples.
a.Graph the relative demand curve along with the relative supply curve:
abba/PP/DD
∵When the market achieves its equilibrium, we have 1ba)(DDbabbaaPPQQQQ
∴RD is a hyperbola xy1
b.What is the equilibrium relative price of apples?
The equilibrium relative price of apples is determined by the intersection of the RD and RS
curves.
RD: yx1
RS:
5]5,5.1[5.1],5.0(5.0)5.0,0[yyyxxx
∴25.0yx 百度文库 - 让每个人平等地提升自我
6 ∴2/bPaPee
c.Describe the pattern of trade.
∵babeaebaPPPPPP///
∴In this two-country world, Home will specialize in the apple production, export apples
and import bananas. Foreign will specialize in the banana production, export bananas and
import apples.
d.Show that both Home and Foreign gain from trade.
International trade allows Home and Foreign to consume anywhere within the colored
lines, which lie outside the countries’ production possibility frontiers. And the indirect
method, specializing in producing only one production then trade with other country, is a
more efficient method than direct production. In the absence of trade, Home could gain
three bananas by foregoing two apples, and Foreign could gain by one foregoing five
bananas. Trade allows each country to trade two bananas for one apple. Home could then
gain four bananas by foregoing two apples while Foreign could gain one apple by
foregoing only two bananas. So both Home and Foreign gain from trade.
4.Suppose that instead of 1200 workers, Home had 2400. Find the equilibrium relative price.
What can you say about the efficiency of world production and the division of the gains from
trade between Home and Foreign in this case?
RD: yx1 百度文库 - 让每个人平等地提升自我
6 RS:
5]5,5.1[5.1],1(1)1,0[yyyxxx
∴5.132yx
∴5.1/bPaPee
In this case, Foreign will specialize in the banana production, export bananas and import
apples. But Home will produce bananas and apples at the same time. And the opportunity
cost of bananas in terms of apples for Home remains the same. So Home neither gains nor
loses but Foreign gains from trade.
5.Suppose that Home has 2400 workers, but they are only half as production in both
industries as we have been assuming, Construct the world relative supply curve and
determine the equilibrium relative price. How do the gains from trade compare with those in
the case described in problem 4?
In this case, the labor is doubled while the productivity of labor is halved, so the "effective
labor"remains the same. So the answer is similar to that in 3. And both Home and Foreign
can gain from trade. But Foreign gains lesser compare with that in the case 4. 百度文库 - 让每个人平等地提升自我
6
6.”Korean workers earn only $ an hour; if we allow Korea to export as much as it likes to
the United States, our workers will be forced down to the same level. You can’t import a $5
shirt without importing the $ wage that goes with it.” Discuss.
In fact, relative wage rate is determined by comparative productivity and the relative demand
for goods. Korea’s low wage reflects the fact that Korea is less productive than the United
States in most industries. Actually, trade with a less productive, low wage country can raise the
welfare and standard of living of countries with high productivity, such as United States. So
this pauper labor argument is wrong.