语言学否定前缀的文献综述
- 格式:doc
- 大小:63.50 KB
- 文档页数:8
基于语料库的英汉否定词缀对比研究本文基于一定数量的语料,从词缀的意义和构成情况对比分析表示否定意义的词缀“非”“无”和“non-”“un”,发现两者之间存在共性,即它们在构成上均可接名词、动词和形容词,在语义上,前缀“un-”后通常加无标记的、弱的、具有积极意义色彩的形容词,而“non-”后所结合的词干一般都只具有客观的、描述性的意义色彩。
汉语类词缀“非”后通常加中性或褒义色彩的词汇,而“无”则更偏向于中性或贬义色彩的词汇。
标签:否定词缀语料库语义韵对比一、引言从发生学上来说,汉语属于汉藏语系的汉语语族,英语属于印欧语系的日耳曼语族。
两者的语言差异显著,因此可以从语音、词汇、语义、语法、修辞和文化等角度进行对比研究。
根据丹麦语言学家叶斯柏森的观点,语言研究有两种方式:既可以从外在形式进行考察,也可以从内在意义进行研究。
词缀是词语的组成部分,也是辨认词类的标记。
尽管学界对汉语词缀的术语界定及词缀的具体分析都存在一些分歧,但作为一种重要的语法现象,它对汉语的发展功不可没。
郭作飞(2004)以“老”“阿”“子”“儿”为例,考察了汉语词缀形成的历史,发现汉语词缀在历史演进过程中具有一般的规律性,即都经历了一个实词虚化的过程。
秦坚(2005)研究了后缀“子”的类型和意义后指出:“子”不是意义单纯的单一语缀,而是语缀聚合-语缀族。
此外,不少学者也对英汉词缀进行了对比分析。
如付海波从汉语和英语词缀的形式位置和语义功能两大方面入手,对汉英派生构词法词缀问题进行了比较研究。
徐若冰(2006)从形态构词法的角度对英汉两种语言的派生构词法进行比较,说明其异同。
英语的词缀可分为三类:前缀、中缀和后缀。
同样,汉语的词缀种类除了前、中、后缀外,还包括多重后缀现象。
(颜天惠、宗世海,2003)本文选取了常见的表示否定意义的词缀“非”“无”和“non-”“un-”进行对比研究。
先对其进行归类,然后利用AntConc3.2.1软件对LOB语料库进行检索,统计出表示英文否定词缀的使用情况。
英语否定前缀的构词特点及语义特征高 学 群(怀化职业技术学院, 湖南 怀化 418000) 摘 要:英语否定前缀在构词上各有特色。
精确地把握否定前缀的语义特征是学习和应用的关键。
同根异缀词的词义规律表现为:不同的前缀蕴涵着不同的词义,词性的变化有时会导致前缀的变异。
关键词:否定前缀;构词法;语义特征中图分类号:H31文献标识码:A文章编号:1671-1785(2006)03-0065-03 在繁多的英语前缀中,表示否定含义的前缀非常多。
如: a-,an-,ab-,anti-,in-,im-,il-,ir-,des-,dis-,dy s -,mal-,mis-,no n-和un-等。
这些否定前缀构词能力极强。
据笔者统计,《英汉大词典》一书中共收集了以un-开头且有否定含义的词约3200之多。
如果把所有带否定前缀的词都加起来,其数量可想而知。
肯定和否定是人们用得最多最广的两种截然相反的表达方法。
有肯定必有否定,如“喜欢、不喜欢;高兴、不高兴;同意、不同意;赞成、不赞成”等。
不过中文和英文表示否定的方法有所不同,汉语是通过添加否定词,如“不、非、反、逆、无、未,没有、对立、缺乏”等来达到否定的目的。
而英语则是通过否定前缀来表达相反的概念和动作。
如;“like喜欢,dislike不喜欢;agr ee赞成,disagr ee不赞成;no rmal正常的,abnor mal反常的,异常的;polit ical政治, apolitical非政治的,无政治意义的,不关心政治的; emplo yment就业,unemplo yment失业。
由于语源不同,这些否定前缀具有各自不同的构词特点和语义特征,给初学者造成了极大的障碍和困惑。
一、否定前缀的构词特点由于英语否定前缀的语源不同,发音不同,语义不同,因此在构词上各有特色。
a-,源于希腊语,一般加在形容词之前,构成意思截然不同的形容词,其基本含义是“无,非,没有”。
Literature ReviewC08英语(3)班赵雁081323327The term morphology was coined by August Schleicher in 1859. In linguistics, morphology is the identification, analysis and description of the structure of a given language's morphemes and other linguistic units, such as words, affixes, parts of speech, intonation/stress, or implied context . However, English acquisition is a difficult part in English learning, for the vocabulary is very large and it is enlarged continuously with the rapid development of modern society. No matter how large the English vocabulary is, words are formed according to certain word-formation rules. Affix knowledge is considered to be an important aspect of vocabulary knowledge. It plays an important part in vocabulary development and reading. The master of affix is of great importance to both language teaching and language learning. Affix knowledge contributes to determining how well a learner reads new words. Thus, the English learners must master the rules in word-formation so well that they can use and remember the vocabulary fluently. Through two months’ efforts in searching, collecting and reading an abundance of scholars and professors’ literature concerning the usage of negative prefixes in morphological aspects , I made a detail analysis of the morphology and created the following essay which summoned up the essence of the negative prefixes used in the BNC corpus.Morphology by Matthews demonstrates the definition of morphology in the modern social life from many aspects. The paper points out that the morphology has many meanings. Words are usually treated as the basic and minimal units of a language to make sentences, which are combinations of words according to syntactic rules. Structurally, however, a word is not the smallest unit because many words can be separated into even smaller meaningful units. These minimal meaningful units are known as morphemes. Since the morphology can develop the people’s knowledge and good values, it is quite important for the researchers to study on it. In this sense, goodacademic knowledge in the study is a part of the tough task. This paper offers much practical ideas for me to think about the meaning of the research on the negative prefixes. Morphemes vary in functions. Accordingly, we can classify morphemes into several general categories: free versus bound, derivational versus inflectional, and lexical versus grammatical. However, their boundaries are not as clear-cut as they appear to be due to some overlapping. For the sake of discussion, we shall define each type in terms of its characteristics.The negative prefixes that the essay researched here are under the circumstances of morphology. It is quite significant for me to start my paper.English V ocabulary Learning Course by Zhang Weiyou is a book that points out a large number of views on word formation. The word itself is an elusive notion, which needs immediate consideration. The relationship between words and vocabulary, between sound and meaning, and between sound and form demands explanation as well. Language is not a fixed list of words but a growing and developing store, which is quite formidable. However, the huge unstable vocabulary of English can be classified into a few manageable categories by different criteria. This is also part of our concern. The expansion of vocabulary in modern English depends chiefly on word formation. There is a variety of means being at work now. According to Pyles and Algeo, words produced through affixation constitute 30% to 40% of the total number of new words. Affixation is generally defined as the formation of words by adding word-formation or derivational affixes to bases. This process is also known as derivation, by which new words are derived from old or base forms. The words created in this way are called derivatives. According to the positions affixes occupy in words, affixation falls into two subcategories: prefixation and suffixation. Prefixation is the formation of new words by adding prefixes to bases. Prefixes do not generally change the word-class of the base but only modify its meaning. For convenience of study, we shall present prefixes on a semantic basis, that is, we shall group prefixes into semantic sets, each consisting of all the major prefixes that have similar meaning and functions. At the same time, the author exactly gives a complete theory of word-formation. It makes me have a better understanding offormation---- how the prefixes are formed.On Ten Semantic Classifications of English Prefixes by Mao Donghui makes an analysis on semantic meanings of negative prefixes. The richness and abundance of English vocabulary is closely related to its prefixes as they provide semantic meanings to the roots in limitation, modification and supplement. In analyzing and generalizing English prefixes, grammarians are also likely to study them from the angle of their semantic functions, and therefore, in learning and studying affixes, it is critical to be in semantic awareness of English prefixes. They are classified into ten kinds of prefixes. All of them are mentioned as follows: negative prefixes, reversative prefixes, pejorative prefixes, prefixes of degree or size, prefixes of orientation and attitude, locative prefixes, prefixes of time and order, number prefixes, miscellaneous neo-classical prefixes and conversion prefixes. Prefixes are very dynamic in word formation. Actually, word-formation mainly has five types. It is called derivation which is made out by adding affixes. Derivation is the most active way in word-formation. And meanwhile, prefixes play an important role in derivation. In many circumstances, prefix and suffix have exactly different functions. Prefix changes the meaning of the roots. But the suffix not only changes its semantic meaning, but also changes its natural characteristic. We can see “in-” and “non-” are part of negative prefixes, but “un-” is part of reversative prefixes. This paper makes me pay more attention to the semantic meanings of negative prefixes.Analyses on Usage of Negative Prefixes “IN-”“UN-”“NON-” by Chen Huanfu discusses the such aspects as prefix’s productivity, origin, distribution and distinctive characteristics in meaning. He also presents a description of three negative prefixes in English, “IN-”, “UN- ” and “NON-”, each of which tends to combine with positive adjectives and the resultant derived adjectives are often lexicalized and assigned negative sense. Being more productive than “IN-”and less productive than “NON-”, “UN-” shows features from both sides, depending on the given stems with which it combines. It also mentions the distinctive semantic features. It contains the difference of concepts and difference of tones. The author also finds out that “NON-”mainly forms the contradictory and complementary opposites. Learning that helps me to havea better understanding in the usage of the negative prefixes.Negative Prefixes and Their Extended Meanings in English by Zhao Chunfeng makes a detail of analysis of their extended meanings. The expansion of vocabulary in modern English depends chiefly on word formation. There are a variety of means being at work now. The most productive are affixation, compounding and conversion. Prefixation is the formation of new words by adding prefixes to bases. Prefixes do not generally change the word-class of the base but only modify its meaning. This essay tries to express the extended meanings of negative prefixes, such as "negative, opposite, and reverse" etc. in the view of word - building of English. The author does not only try to explain these negative prefixes, but to expound their extended meanings as well. We get to know by means of studying them that these prefixes have undergone through a course from their original simple meanings to their various ones of today, which helps us further and better understand English affixes. It struck me again that the negative prefix plays an essential part; therefore, the study of it seems to be significant.A Contrastive Study of the Characteristics of the Lexical Structural Systems Between English and Chinese by Zhang Weiyou gives me a quite comprehensive knowledge of the lexical structural system. English and Chinese have their own conspicuous characteristics in structural systems of lexis, which are reflected in the morphological structures of words and word-formation. The most productive are affixation, compounding and conversion. According to the positions affixes occupy in words, affixation falls into two subcategories: prefixation and suffixation. Prefixes do not generally change the word-class of the base but only modify its meaning. For convenience of study, we shall present prefixes on a semantic basis, that is, we shall group prefixes into semantic sets, each consisting of all the major prefixes that have similar meaning and functions. A contrastive study of the lexical systems of English and Chinese in such respects of morphemes and words, morphemes and affixes, positions of morphemes in words, words and non-words, word-formation and syntax, etc. discloses that there are both similarities and differences in the vocabularies of the two languages, but the differences overwhelm similarities. This paper teaches me howto choose the factors to study and analyze the different concepts and gives me the idea of trying to analyze usage in special ways by the BNC corpus.A Corpus-based Study on Derivational Affixes in English for Science and Technology by Leng Hui gives a comprehensive summarization of negative prefix’s similarities and differences. The study is aimed at finding out the basic similarities and differences among “IN-”, “UN –”and “NON-”. Description of the negative prefix’s productivity, distribution and distinctive characteristics in meaning are also mentioned. This paper briefly analyzes the diachronic study of English word-formation in an attempt to depict English negative prefixes from an etymological perspective. One way to distinguish English synonyms is to detect their origins: “IN-”, and “UN-”are separately attached to word bases that share origins. Studying the word-formation characteristics and semantic features of negative prefix can help us understand its word-formation, semantic features and master the usage features. Thus, we can improve our ability of word-formation, expand vocabulary effectively and improve the ability of reading, listening, writing, speaking and understanding. Thereby we can reduce remembering-vocabulary failure caused by the structures of each word. And the idea leads me to think more about the ways and results the vocabulary differences among words can change by affixes.A Corpus-based Study of Morphological Productivity of Negative Prefixes in English by Du Lifang focuses on the influences of the productivity of negative prefixes. In English, there are at least ten prefixes that denote negative meaning, and it’s often very confusing to English learners as to the subtle differences in their usage. English learners are especially puzzled about the phenomenon that the same base takes different negative prefix to express its negative, like immoral and unmoral; inhuman, unhuman and non-human. Although some research has been done in this field as to the application/combination rules concerning the different negative prefixes, e.g. factors that influence the productivity of a particular one, there seems to be a gap as to the quantitative study of productivity of these negative prefixes. So the author would like to make an attempt in this field. In this paper, five commonly-usednegative prefixes in English are selected for the present study :a-,dis-, in- (including its variants il-, ir-, im- ),non- and un-.Scholars have been trying to provide effective ways of accessing the productivity of affixes quantitatively. However, it seems that no one of the measurements is hardly without any objections, either in theoretical point of view or in practical application. However, each measure does reflect a different aspect of productivity. When applying those measures, one should have a clear view in mind about that. In view of theoretical and methodological problems in practical application, and also of its significance of the results for the future, this paper adopts two measures to assess the productivity of negative prefixes in English: one is type frequency, which is to gauge past productivity, that is to make a survey of how many members each of the prefixes has so far generated. It imposes me to enlarge my thinking span.Talking about the English Negative Prefixes by Leng Hui gives me a general and detailed outlook of the English negative prefixes. Among all the English prefixes, the ability of word formation in negative prefixes is very strong. And the words formed by negative prefixes hold a large proportion in amount of the derivation. However, due to its own characters on word-formation and semantic in negative prefixes, it seems to be changeable for the learners who are begin to learn English. Meanwhile, it is difficult for them to remember the new words. Thus, in order to know these negative prefixes well, the learners must learn from two aspects. These are their features of word-formation and the characters of their semantic. The elements that affect the word formation of the negative prefixes can be summarized into three rules, namely homologous rules, collocation rules and assimilation rules. Studying the word-formation characteristics and semantic features of negative prefix can help us understand its word-formation, semantic features and master the usage features. Thus, we can improve our ability of word-formation, expand vocabulary effectively and improve the ability of reading, listening, writing, speaking and understanding. And this paper offers much to the frame of my paper; its idea is beneficial to my paper.Prefixal Negation and Non-prefixal negation of English Adjectives written byHu Youxin and Li Xuzhong gives me a quite comprehensive knowledge of negation of English adjectives.There are various negative prefixes in English word formation. It is essential to grasp the negative features of the prefixes in the study and practice of English. This paper focuses on prefixal negation and non-prefixal negation of English adjectives. The authors begin by discussing the lexical gaps, contextual constraints and semantic differences. They found out that it did have the pragmatic and semantic differences between the prefixal negation and non-prefixal negation, which seem to have the same meaning. The paper aims to find out their situation when to use and factors which are restricted. At the end, they conclude the theory about adjectives by many examples in the sentences with an emphasis on each semantic feature. Results analyzed in the following chapters are meaningful for my paper where is stating the differences in their semantic meanings, and impose me to enlarge my thinking span.Having read the above literature concerning English negative prefixes of their usages, we have no difficulty in finding that we should focus more on the usage of negative prefixes “IN-”, “UN –”and “NON-”. Meanwhile, we also realize the corpus-based research play an important role in the study of linguistics. More and more scholars and professors both at home and abroad are paying more attention to the field of negative prefixes. From the literature, we know some important ideas and information about negative prefixes, how to classify negative prefixes according to different word formations and their natural characters. Teachers of English need also do some experimental research to see how the findings from the study could be used to teach words containing negative prefixes efficiently and effectively. In order to learn English well and communicate with people better, we should learning much about morphology, use them reasonably. Because it is the foundation of learn English. Besides, morphology is useful for us to pursue research into negative prefixes. I hope that I can make some contribution to this field by reading and researching extensively and analyzing the morphology.ReferencesAdams, V. An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation[M]. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Group Ltd, 1973:23-25.Algeo, J. The Voguish Use of non-, American Speech[J]. 1971:87-105.Barber, C. The English Language: A Historical Introduction[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993:45-46.Lipka, L. An Outline of English Lexicology: Lexical Structure, Word Semantics and Word-Formation[M]. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 1990:63-65. Mattews. Morphology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Foreign language teaching and research press, 2000.程焕福。
常用英语单词前缀大全(否定前缀篇)im-加在字母m,b,p之前impossible(不顺能的),impolite(不礼貌的),impudence(厚颜无耻)in-加在形容词,名词之前incorrect(不正确的),inability(无能,无力),inaccurate(不准确的)ir-加在以r开头的词前irregular(不稳定的),irresistable(不可抵抗的),irresolvable(不能分解的,不能解决的)un-加在名词,形容词,副词之前unfinished(未完成的)undoubted(无疑的)unemployment(失业)还有一些前缀的规则:non-加在形容词,名词前non-existence(不存在),non-essential(不主要的),non-electrical(非电的)8.mis-加在动词、名词之前misunderstand(误解),misjudge(误判),misleading(误导),misfortune(不幸)9.dis-加地动词之前disappear(消失),disarm(解除武装),disconnect(失去联系)10.de-加在名词,形容词之前demobilize(遣散;使…复员) decolor (脱色,漂白)11.anti-加在名词、形容词之前anti-Japanese(抗日战争),anti-social(厌恶社会的,反社会的),antidite(解毒药)12.counter-加在名词、动词前counterattack(反攻,反击),counteract(抵抗,阻碍)counterrevolution(反革命)dis(not, the opposite of)disadvantage, dislike, disagree, disappear, disarm, disaster, disastrous, disap point, disable, disability, discharge, disclose, discount, discourage, discove r, discovery, discrepancy, disease, disgrace, disguise, disgust, dishonor, dish onest, dislike, dismay, disorder, dispatch, disperse, displace, displacement, d isplease, disregard, dissatisfy, distort , distract, disintegrate, isparage, di spassion, disproportionate2) in- (not, in, into)inability, incorrect, inability, incapable, indirect, inhuman, injustice, infor mal, inside, include, inclusive, income, increase, increasingly, incredible, in definite, independence, independent, indifferent, indirect, indispensable, indi vidual, indoor, inertia , inevitable, infamous , infinite, inhabit , inhabitan t, inherent , inject, inland , inlet , inner, innocent, innumerable , input, in quire, inquiry, insane, insensitive, insert, inside, insight, insist, inspect, inspiration , inspire, install, installation, installment , instance, instant, instinct, insulate , intense, interior, internal, into, intrinsic, invade, inva lid , invaluable , invariably , invasion, invert , investigate, invisible, invo lve, inward, incomplete, indecisive, inedible, inept, inevitably, infection, in firm, injection, innate, insatiable, insecurity, insider, insidious3) im-(not, in, into) impossible, imbalance, immature, immoral, impatient, implicit , impress, impression, import, immigrate, imprison, immerse4) il- (not)illegal, illiterate, illogical ir- (not) irregular, irresponsible, irrespective 5) un- (not)unable, uncover, undo, undoubtedly, undress , uneasy, unemployment , unexpecte d, unfold , unfortunately, unimportant, unlike, unload, unusual, unaware, enlig htened, unparalleled, unsustainable,6) non- (not)nonsmoker, nonexistence, non-cooperation, nonstop, nonmetal, nonresident, nonse nse, nonfundamentalist, nonspecialist7) mis- (wrong, wrongly)mislead, misspell, misstep, misfortune, misuse, misguided, misinformation8) de- (showing the opposite, to remove, to reduce)deform, deface, demobilize, destruction, deforest, denationalize, depress, depr ession, decode, decrease, degenerate , degrade , descend, descendant , descent。
否定前缀根据否定意义的不同共包括四种类型:逆反前缀(Reversative or Privative Prefixes),纯否定前缀(negative prefixes)、贬义前缀(pejorative prefixes)和对立前缀(against prefixes)(表示相反、相互对立意义的前缀)。
应注意的是,同一种形式的前缀,可能属于不同的前缀类型:(1)逆反前缀(Reversative or Privative Prefixes),un-, de-和dis-。
1) un-加在动词、名词上构成动词,表示“反动作”的意义。
例如:uncouple(去耦)unbend(放直,展开)unhook(摘钩)unsay(收回意见)unfasten(打开,放松)unglove(脱去手套)对于前缀un-来说,有些语法学家还把它称为消除性的un-,(privative un-)用在动词词根(尤其是由名词转化成的动词)前,消除原来动词的功能,表示相反的意思。
例如:unlock(开锁)---lock(锁)unbind(解开)---bind(捆上)unwrap(打开) --- wrap(包上)undress(脱衣)--- dress(穿衣)2) de- 一般加在动词、形容词上表示“反,去,解,消,除,脱”的意义。
例如:decentralize(分散) demodulation(解调)despun(反自旋)depolarization(去极化)defend(防御)dehydration(脱水)demonopolize(消除垄断)deoxidize(去氧)deform degrade (upgrade) decrease3) dis-一般加在动词及名词或形容词上来构成动词,表示含有“反转,复原”的意义。
例如:disarm(解除武装)disown(脱离关系,否认)disconnect(分离)disable(使无能)disbranch(去枝条)disjoin(拆散)disproof(反证)disappear(不见,消失)(2)纯否定前缀(negative prefixes):a-, dis-, in-, ne-, un-.这类前缀是纯粹表示否定的意思。
否定词前缀总结第1篇im-polite-impolite礼貌的- 不礼貌的adj.possible-impossible可能的- 不可能的adj.in-correct-incorrect正确的- 错误的adj.convenient-inconvenient方便的- 不方便的adj.dependent-independent依赖的- 独立的adj.dis-agree-disagree同意- 不同意v.able-disabled有能力的- 丧失能力的,有残疾的adj. il-legal-illegal合法的- 不合法的adj.ir-regular-irregular有规律的- 无规律的adj.挖掘“活跃词”的深意否定词前缀总结第2篇●Everyone should learn how to be ________ in our daily life. (depend) (2021年长宁区一模)解析:independentbe independent in our daily life在日常生活中要独立●Eventually students will graduate from schools to live as fully ________ adults. (depend) (2021 年青浦区一模)解析:independentfully independent adults完全独立的成年人●Studying abroad has made me much more ________ in many ways.(depend) (2020年宝山区一模)解析:independentmake sb. independent使某人独立通过如上三题,你会惊人地发现,一些经常出现的单词里,原来暗藏着老师们的谆谆教诲,希望我们养成优秀的品质啊!所以我们继续来探索,除了独立,我们还需要摒弃哪些陋习呢?否定词前缀总结第3篇否定前缀dis-往往可以加在动词、形容词之前构成否定,这些是大家平日学习中不太熟悉的,一定要特别注意。
关于否定前缀“不、無、非”和类词缀“不、无、非”的对照研究中日两国是一衣带水的邻邦,两国之问的交流更是源远流长。
特别是在文化方面,公元前二、三世纪左右,中国的汉字经朝鲜半岛传入日本,使日本首次拥有了可以记录历史、文化的文字。
而到了近现代,日本在学习西方文化的过程中,利用汉字创造了大量的新词汇,如“民主”“经济”等,并且传入中国,不仅推动了中国近代化的进程,更丰富了中国的汉字体系。
在这个相互交流的过程中,我们注意到了中日两国语言中都存在着“不景气”“不治”“无党派”“无敌”“非金属”这类以否定词开头的词语。
在作为黏着语的日语和作为孤立语的汉语中,这类词语究竟有什么样的区别和联系?本论文将以『国语大辞典』和『汉语大词典』中抽出的以上述否定词开头的词语为研究对象进行对比研究,找出这类词语中存在的一些规律,并弄清中日两语之间存在的联系与区别。
本论文由以下几个部分组成。
第一章中介绍了“不、无、非”在日语和汉语中的定位。
第二章以『国语大辞典』和『汉语大词典』中抽出的词语为对象,分析了日语和汉语中与“不、无、非”结合的词根的词性以及在与“不、无、非”结合后所形成的词语的词性。
第三章中重点对日语和汉语中“不、无、非”在复合词中的意义进行了对比研究,并对中日两国语言中“不”的否定意义添加功能以及“不”否定意义的弱化进行了分析。
同时,本章中还通过对日语中「不」和「无」的读音变化及不同读音下构词力和意思的差别进行对照来力求发现古代汉语对日语的影响。
第四章中以网络词典『中华诗词网—词语大全』和『国语大辞典』中抽出的词语为对象,分析了日语和汉语中“不、无、非”的否定范围。
最后,对本论文中对比研究后得出的结论进行总结,对中国学习者提出建议,并对今后的研究课题进行展望。
现代汉语词缀研究现代汉语词缀研究在语言学领域具有重要意义。
通过对词缀的深入了解,我们可以更好地理解汉语词汇的构成和使用,为语言教学、词典编纂、语言风格研究等领域提供有力支持。
本文将概述现代汉语词缀研究的意义和现状,分类探讨词缀的特性,并分析词缀在语言应用中的重要角色。
最后,文章将总结现代汉语词缀研究的主要内容,强调其必要性和重要性。
一、现代汉语词缀研究概述词缀是指在词根前或后附加的语素,如“子”、“头”等。
现代汉语中,词缀现象较为普遍,涉及的词缀种类繁多。
通过对现代汉语词缀的研究,我们可以了解词语产生的历史背景、演变过程以及使用规范,有助于解释汉语词汇体系的构成和发展。
二、现代汉语词缀分类研究1、前缀:前缀是指在词根前面的附加成分,如“老”、“阿”等。
前缀通常不改变词根的词性,但在语义上往往对整个词语产生一定的影响。
例如,“老”加在姓氏前表示对对方的尊称,“阿”加在人名前表示亲切。
2、后缀:后缀是指在词根后面的附加成分,如“儿”、“化”等。
后缀通常也不改变词根的词性,但在语法和语用上往往对整个词语产生一定的影响。
例如,“儿”用于名词后表示“小”或“可爱”,“化”用于动词后表示“变为”或“成为”。
3、中缀:中缀是指在词根中间插入的语素,如“不”、“里”等。
中缀可以改变词语的语法和语义关系,使词语具有新的意义和用法。
例如,“不”加在“好”的前面表示否定,“里”加在长度单位前表示内部。
三、现代汉语词缀语义研究词缀在语义上具有一定的象征性,这种象征性主要通过隐喻、比喻、借代等修辞手法实现。
例如,“X族”中的“族”表示一类人或事物,通过隐喻手法将具有某一共同特点的一类人或事物归为一个语义场,方便人们理解和记忆。
此外,词缀还承载着一定的文化内涵和情感色彩,如“阿妈”、“老爹”等词语中的“阿”、“老”等词缀体现了亲昵、尊敬等情感色彩。
四、现代汉语词缀应用研究现代汉语词缀研究在语言教学、词汇学习、语言风格等方面具有广泛的应用价值。
现代汉语否定焦点研究综述焦点本来是个光学上的术语,现在它已成为当代语言学的一个重要概念。
由于理论背景的差异与思考模式的不同,至今,语法学界对焦点的概念、分类、数量、标记方式等问题尚未达成共识,对否定焦点等特殊问题的研究还相当薄弱。
否定是语用平面的重要概念,属于句子表达的口气范畴。
汉语中常使用“不”“没”“别”等标记进行否定。
可以说,否定焦点既是现代汉语否定句研究的子课题,也是焦点理论研究的子课题,是一个具有交叉性质的课题。
就现有文献看,汉语否定句研究中最引人注意的问题是否定中心(即否定焦点,为行文方便,下文所涉及到的“否定中心”一律称为“否定焦点”)的识别和否定句的歧义问题,而目前汉语否定焦点研究存在的主要分歧也在于此,即否定焦点与否定句的焦点是否一致。
谈到否定焦点,就必然要涉及否定范围(即否定辖域,为行文方便,文中所涉及到的“否定辖域”一律称为“否定范围”)的问题。
否定焦点和否定范围是R.Quirk,G.Leech等人在研究英语否定句时提出的概念。
近年来,汉语语法界对否定焦点的研究主要有:沈开木(1984)从语用的角度把“不”的作用分为两大类:一为没有语音停顿的,二为有语音停顿的。
没有语音停顿的,“不”字的否定范围可以明确地表达出来,包括以下两种情况:第一,当一个短语不是主谓短语的时候,“不”字的否定范围常常是从它后面的那个词开始,到动词的宾语为止,即是说管到逻辑宾语为止。
如“不在他面前说笑话”中“不”字的否定范围是从“在”开始,到动词的宾语“笑话”为止。
如果逻辑宾语以副动词(介词)的宾语的姿态出现,“不”字的否定范围便管到副动词的宾语。
如“对他不关心”中副动词的宾语“他”属于“不”字的否定范围。
第二,当一个短语是主谓短语的时候,否定范围管到主语。
因为主语有的是逻辑宾语,有的是逻辑主项的组成部分。
如“他不洗衣服”中主语“他”是逻辑主项的组成部分,与“洗衣服”合起来表示一件事,因而属于否定范围。
英语否定后缀—less和—free语义探析否定后缀;生成机制;语义限制;语义区别一、引言:逻辑学意义“否定”与语言学意义“否定”曾炳衡指出,逻辑意义上的“否定”(negation)是“肯定”(affirmation)的对立面,二者皆为思维和言语中必不可少的范畴。
“肯定”与“否定”,“是”与“非”,绝对相反,不容混淆。
语言中的否定,其意义范围比逻辑上的所谓否定要广泛得多。
具体地说,举凡否认、拒绝、禁阻、反衬、述无、言非、指未、示否、剥夺等等,无不包括在内。
[1]正因如此,Hamawand 将英语中的否定前缀进行主要与次要之分,主要否定前缀是:a (n), de, dis, in, non和un;次要否定前缀指:ab, anti,contra, counter, mal, mis, pseudo, quasi, sub, semi 和under。
[2]对英语否定表达手段,Tottie提出二分法:词缀法与非词缀法。
[3]词缀法指通过构词手段,即在词基(base)之前或之后添加否定前缀或否定后缀。
英语否定后缀用的最多是less,牛津英语语法[4]和Hamawand把free视作否定后缀。
[2] 否定词缀只对它附着的词起否定作用,而不影响句子的语法结构。
非词缀法是指用句法手段,即用否定词no、not、never和用词汇手段,即具有否定意义的词汇,如:seldom, hardly,rarely, scarcely, little等以及利用矛盾反义词,如:true-false, have-lack, remember-forget, succeed-fail,present-absent等等才具有否定的效果。
[1]二、关于否定前缀的文献综述1.从词源学角度研究否定前缀的形态,得出否定前缀的选择一般遵循同源原则(1)a(n)是借用希腊语,依附来自希腊语词基的词汇。
如:asymmetrical, acardiac, atheist等,这类词主要成为科技和医学术语。
元语音否定的否定标记语研究——基于Levinson的量原则与信息原则的开题报告
首先,本文旨在探讨元语音否定的否定标记语在自然语言中的运用和作用,并基于Levinson的量原则和信息原则进行分析。
元语音指的是语音中的非语法成分,例如停顿、音调、语速、音量等。
其中,元语音的否定形式多种多样,例如连读、缩读、跳读等。
这些否定形式常常被用来传递不同的语境、情感和意图。
在语言学中,否定是一种非常重要的语法成分,可以直接或间接地表示否定的意思。
但是,有时我们需要用到否定的否定来表达肯定的意思。
例如,当我们用“不错”来表达“很好”的意思时,就是一种否定的否定。
Levinson的量原则认为,说话人在表达自己的意见时,尽可能地提供恰当数量的信息,既不过多又不过少。
因此,在使用否定的否定标记语时,要尽量确保用法得当、清晰明了,并符合语境和情感的要求。
另外,Levinson的信息原则认为,说话人在表达意见时要尽量让对方获得新的信息,避免重复和模糊。
在使用否定的否定标记语时,也要尽量避免重复和模糊,以确保传递清晰的意思。
综上所述,本文将通过对元语音否定的否定标记语在自然语言中的运用和作用进行分析,并基于Levinson的量原则和信息原则进行探讨。
最终目的是深入理解和应用否定的否定标记语,提高语言表达的准确度和效果。
现代英汉语否定词缀对比研究摘要:从语言形态学分类的角度,探究英汉语词汇构成的异同。
英语和汉语大略上可分别归属于屈折语与孤立语,英语中派生词最多,汉语中复合词最多。
对现代英汉语中的否定词缀进行了对比研究,以期对这两种语言的教学与研究有一定的借鉴意义。
关键词:语言形态学;否定词缀;对比中图分类号:G642.0文献标志码:A文章编号:1674-9324(2019)48-0071-02收稿日期:2019-09-09作者简介:蒲晓燕(1974-),女(汉族),四川西充人,贵州大学外国语学院教师,硕士,研究方向:英汉对比及应用语言学。
一、语言的形态学分类在语言学研究中,语言可以根据其词汇形态特征分为孤立语(Isolating Language )、屈折语(Inflecting Language )、黏着语(agglutinating language )与多式综合语(incorporating language )四种主要类型(许余龙,2002)。
孤立语也叫作分析语或词根语,一般不是通过词形变化(即词的内部形态变化,又称作屈折变化)来表达语法的作用,而是通过独立的虚词和固定的词序来表达语法意义。
孤立语以越南语为突出代表。
屈折语(也叫综合语)主要以词形变化来表示语法关系,并且其词语内部各语素之间没有较为明显清楚的界限,印欧语系所包含的各语言(如法语等)为屈折语的典型代表。
与屈折语相似,黏着语的词形变化也相当丰富,也是通过词本身形式的变化来表示各种不同的语法关系。
日语和土耳其语可以说是黏着语的典型代表。
多式综合语的特点非常鲜明,与其他语言类型相比,它以句子而不是词来充当语言的基本单位,其实在多式综合语中,根本不存在词这种独立存在的造句单位。
多式综合语以因纽特语等土著语言为代表。
语言的形态类型差别与词汇系统的总的形态构成特点对比有着密切的关系。
虽然一些属于综合语的形态成分在汉语中确实存在,但是在语言学研究中,语言学家仍然普遍把汉语归属于孤立语。
否定前缀小议
黄晓萍
【期刊名称】《伊犁教育》
【年(卷),期】2005(000)003
【摘要】我们承认否定前缀un-、in-和dis-有否定意义的同时,实际上它还存在许多不全表示否定的意思。
通过文中的比较分析,说明根据否定词缀增加词汇量无疑是一种有效途径。
但由于有许多容易产生误解的地方,切忌望“缀”生义,有否定前缀的单词也不完全表示否定。
一定要认真对待之。
【总页数】2页(P30-31)
【作者】黄晓萍
【作者单位】无
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】G633.41
【相关文献】
1.常用英语否定前缀解析
2.英语否定前缀un-的语义特征
3.浅谈英语否定前缀及词汇学习
4.英语形容词的前缀否定与非前缀否定
5.汉韩否定前缀“非”的构词功能对比
因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。
英语否定语义辖域略论
刘龙根
【期刊名称】《解放军外国语学院学报》
【年(卷),期】1992(000)004
【摘要】<正>辖域(scope)是现代英语语言学研究的一个重要概念,它主要指在言语中受某个成分意义辖制或影响的范围.顾名思义,否定辖域即指在一个小句(clause)中受否定词意义影响的语义范围.一般说来,英语否定的辖域是从否定词开始一直延伸至该小句的句末.正因为这样,我们才可以表达如下的意义对比:
【总页数】8页(P33-39,45)
【作者】刘龙根
【作者单位】
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】H3
【相关文献】
1.窝尼话的否定辖域和否定焦点 [J], 杨艳;罗增勇
2.情态意义、否定辖域和动词体的选择——一项以俄语语料库为基础,以英语情态意义研究为参照的跨语言对比研究 [J], 马志刚
3.从否定辖域、否定焦点解析维吾尔语否定句中的歧义现象 [J], 徐江;吐尔逊·卡得
4.汉英否定句的否定辖域与否定焦点 [J], 王月华
5.基于语义解释和语段理论的否定模态与辖域计算 [J], 张连文
因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。
Literature ReviewC08英语(3)班赵雁081323327The term morphology was coined by August Schleicher in 1859. In linguistics, morphology is the identification, analysis and description of the structure of a given language's morphemes and other linguistic units, such as words, affixes, parts of speech, intonation/stress, or implied context . However, English acquisition is a difficult part in English learning, for the vocabulary is very large and it is enlarged continuously with the rapid development of modern society. No matter how large the English vocabulary is, words are formed according to certain word-formation rules. Affix knowledge is considered to be an important aspect of vocabulary knowledge. It plays an important part in vocabulary development and reading. The master of affix is of great importance to both language teaching and language learning. Affix knowledge contributes to determining how well a learner reads new words. Thus, the English learners must master the rules in word-formation so well that they can use and remember the vocabulary fluently. Through two months’ efforts in searching, collecting and reading an abundance of scholars and professors’ literature concerning the usage of negative prefixes in morphological aspects , I made a detail analysis of the morphology and created the following essay which summoned up the essence of the negative prefixes used in the BNC corpus.Morphology by Matthews demonstrates the definition of morphology in the modern social life from many aspects. The paper points out that the morphology has many meanings. Words are usually treated as the basic and minimal units of a language to make sentences, which are combinations of words according to syntactic rules. Structurally, however, a word is not the smallest unit because many words can be separated into even smaller meaningful units. These minimal meaningful units are known as morphemes. Since the morphology can develop the people’s knowledge and good values, it is quite important for the researchers to study on it. In this sense, goodacademic knowledge in the study is a part of the tough task. This paper offers much practical ideas for me to think about the meaning of the research on the negative prefixes. Morphemes vary in functions. Accordingly, we can classify morphemes into several general categories: free versus bound, derivational versus inflectional, and lexical versus grammatical. However, their boundaries are not as clear-cut as they appear to be due to some overlapping. For the sake of discussion, we shall define each type in terms of its characteristics.The negative prefixes that the essay researched here are under the circumstances of morphology. It is quite significant for me to start my paper.English V ocabulary Learning Course by Zhang Weiyou is a book that points out a large number of views on word formation. The word itself is an elusive notion, which needs immediate consideration. The relationship between words and vocabulary, between sound and meaning, and between sound and form demands explanation as well. Language is not a fixed list of words but a growing and developing store, which is quite formidable. However, the huge unstable vocabulary of English can be classified into a few manageable categories by different criteria. This is also part of our concern. The expansion of vocabulary in modern English depends chiefly on word formation. There is a variety of means being at work now. According to Pyles and Algeo, words produced through affixation constitute 30% to 40% of the total number of new words. Affixation is generally defined as the formation of words by adding word-formation or derivational affixes to bases. This process is also known as derivation, by which new words are derived from old or base forms. The words created in this way are called derivatives. According to the positions affixes occupy in words, affixation falls into two subcategories: prefixation and suffixation. Prefixation is the formation of new words by adding prefixes to bases. Prefixes do not generally change the word-class of the base but only modify its meaning. For convenience of study, we shall present prefixes on a semantic basis, that is, we shall group prefixes into semantic sets, each consisting of all the major prefixes that have similar meaning and functions. At the same time, the author exactly gives a complete theory of word-formation. It makes me have a better understanding offormation---- how the prefixes are formed.On Ten Semantic Classifications of English Prefixes by Mao Donghui makes an analysis on semantic meanings of negative prefixes. The richness and abundance of English vocabulary is closely related to its prefixes as they provide semantic meanings to the roots in limitation, modification and supplement. In analyzing and generalizing English prefixes, grammarians are also likely to study them from the angle of their semantic functions, and therefore, in learning and studying affixes, it is critical to be in semantic awareness of English prefixes. They are classified into ten kinds of prefixes. All of them are mentioned as follows: negative prefixes, reversative prefixes, pejorative prefixes, prefixes of degree or size, prefixes of orientation and attitude, locative prefixes, prefixes of time and order, number prefixes, miscellaneous neo-classical prefixes and conversion prefixes. Prefixes are very dynamic in word formation. Actually, word-formation mainly has five types. It is called derivation which is made out by adding affixes. Derivation is the most active way in word-formation. And meanwhile, prefixes play an important role in derivation. In many circumstances, prefix and suffix have exactly different functions. Prefix changes the meaning of the roots. But the suffix not only changes its semantic meaning, but also changes its natural characteristic. We can see “in-” and “non-” are part of negative prefixes, but “un-” is part of reversative prefixes. This paper makes me pay more attention to the semantic meanings of negative prefixes.Analyses on Usage of Negative Prefixes “IN-”“UN-”“NON-” by Chen Huanfu discusses the such aspects as prefix’s productivity, origin, distribution and distinctive characteristics in meaning. He also presents a description of three negative prefixes in English, “IN-”, “UN- ” and “NON-”, each of which tends to combine with positive adjectives and the resultant derived adjectives are often lexicalized and assigned negative sense. Being more productive than “IN-”and less productive than “NON-”, “UN-” shows features from both sides, depending on the given stems with which it combines. It also mentions the distinctive semantic features. It contains the difference of concepts and difference of tones. The author also finds out that “NON-”mainly forms the contradictory and complementary opposites. Learning that helps me to havea better understanding in the usage of the negative prefixes.Negative Prefixes and Their Extended Meanings in English by Zhao Chunfeng makes a detail of analysis of their extended meanings. The expansion of vocabulary in modern English depends chiefly on word formation. There are a variety of means being at work now. The most productive are affixation, compounding and conversion. Prefixation is the formation of new words by adding prefixes to bases. Prefixes do not generally change the word-class of the base but only modify its meaning. This essay tries to express the extended meanings of negative prefixes, such as "negative, opposite, and reverse" etc. in the view of word - building of English. The author does not only try to explain these negative prefixes, but to expound their extended meanings as well. We get to know by means of studying them that these prefixes have undergone through a course from their original simple meanings to their various ones of today, which helps us further and better understand English affixes. It struck me again that the negative prefix plays an essential part; therefore, the study of it seems to be significant.A Contrastive Study of the Characteristics of the Lexical Structural Systems Between English and Chinese by Zhang Weiyou gives me a quite comprehensive knowledge of the lexical structural system. English and Chinese have their own conspicuous characteristics in structural systems of lexis, which are reflected in the morphological structures of words and word-formation. The most productive are affixation, compounding and conversion. According to the positions affixes occupy in words, affixation falls into two subcategories: prefixation and suffixation. Prefixes do not generally change the word-class of the base but only modify its meaning. For convenience of study, we shall present prefixes on a semantic basis, that is, we shall group prefixes into semantic sets, each consisting of all the major prefixes that have similar meaning and functions. A contrastive study of the lexical systems of English and Chinese in such respects of morphemes and words, morphemes and affixes, positions of morphemes in words, words and non-words, word-formation and syntax, etc. discloses that there are both similarities and differences in the vocabularies of the two languages, but the differences overwhelm similarities. This paper teaches me howto choose the factors to study and analyze the different concepts and gives me the idea of trying to analyze usage in special ways by the BNC corpus.A Corpus-based Study on Derivational Affixes in English for Science and Technology by Leng Hui gives a comprehensive summarization of negative prefix’s similarities and differences. The study is aimed at finding out the basic similarities and differences among “IN-”, “UN –”and “NON-”. Description of the negative prefix’s productivity, distribution and distinctive characteristics in meaning are also mentioned. This paper briefly analyzes the diachronic study of English word-formation in an attempt to depict English negative prefixes from an etymological perspective. One way to distinguish English synonyms is to detect their origins: “IN-”, and “UN-”are separately attached to word bases that share origins. Studying the word-formation characteristics and semantic features of negative prefix can help us understand its word-formation, semantic features and master the usage features. Thus, we can improve our ability of word-formation, expand vocabulary effectively and improve the ability of reading, listening, writing, speaking and understanding. Thereby we can reduce remembering-vocabulary failure caused by the structures of each word. And the idea leads me to think more about the ways and results the vocabulary differences among words can change by affixes.A Corpus-based Study of Morphological Productivity of Negative Prefixes in English by Du Lifang focuses on the influences of the productivity of negative prefixes. In English, there are at least ten prefixes that denote negative meaning, and it’s often very confusing to English learners as to the subtle differences in their usage. English learners are especially puzzled about the phenomenon that the same base takes different negative prefix to express its negative, like immoral and unmoral; inhuman, unhuman and non-human. Although some research has been done in this field as to the application/combination rules concerning the different negative prefixes, e.g. factors that influence the productivity of a particular one, there seems to be a gap as to the quantitative study of productivity of these negative prefixes. So the author would like to make an attempt in this field. In this paper, five commonly-usednegative prefixes in English are selected for the present study :a-,dis-, in- (including its variants il-, ir-, im- ),non- and un-.Scholars have been trying to provide effective ways of accessing the productivity of affixes quantitatively. However, it seems that no one of the measurements is hardly without any objections, either in theoretical point of view or in practical application. However, each measure does reflect a different aspect of productivity. When applying those measures, one should have a clear view in mind about that. In view of theoretical and methodological problems in practical application, and also of its significance of the results for the future, this paper adopts two measures to assess the productivity of negative prefixes in English: one is type frequency, which is to gauge past productivity, that is to make a survey of how many members each of the prefixes has so far generated. It imposes me to enlarge my thinking span.Talking about the English Negative Prefixes by Leng Hui gives me a general and detailed outlook of the English negative prefixes. Among all the English prefixes, the ability of word formation in negative prefixes is very strong. And the words formed by negative prefixes hold a large proportion in amount of the derivation. However, due to its own characters on word-formation and semantic in negative prefixes, it seems to be changeable for the learners who are begin to learn English. Meanwhile, it is difficult for them to remember the new words. Thus, in order to know these negative prefixes well, the learners must learn from two aspects. These are their features of word-formation and the characters of their semantic. The elements that affect the word formation of the negative prefixes can be summarized into three rules, namely homologous rules, collocation rules and assimilation rules. Studying the word-formation characteristics and semantic features of negative prefix can help us understand its word-formation, semantic features and master the usage features. Thus, we can improve our ability of word-formation, expand vocabulary effectively and improve the ability of reading, listening, writing, speaking and understanding. And this paper offers much to the frame of my paper; its idea is beneficial to my paper.Prefixal Negation and Non-prefixal negation of English Adjectives written byHu Youxin and Li Xuzhong gives me a quite comprehensive knowledge of negation of English adjectives.There are various negative prefixes in English word formation. It is essential to grasp the negative features of the prefixes in the study and practice of English. This paper focuses on prefixal negation and non-prefixal negation of English adjectives. The authors begin by discussing the lexical gaps, contextual constraints and semantic differences. They found out that it did have the pragmatic and semantic differences between the prefixal negation and non-prefixal negation, which seem to have the same meaning. The paper aims to find out their situation when to use and factors which are restricted. At the end, they conclude the theory about adjectives by many examples in the sentences with an emphasis on each semantic feature. Results analyzed in the following chapters are meaningful for my paper where is stating the differences in their semantic meanings, and impose me to enlarge my thinking span.Having read the above literature concerning English negative prefixes of their usages, we have no difficulty in finding that we should focus more on the usage of negative prefixes “IN-”, “UN –”and “NON-”. Meanwhile, we also realize the corpus-based research play an important role in the study of linguistics. More and more scholars and professors both at home and abroad are paying more attention to the field of negative prefixes. From the literature, we know some important ideas and information about negative prefixes, how to classify negative prefixes according to different word formations and their natural characters. Teachers of English need also do some experimental research to see how the findings from the study could be used to teach words containing negative prefixes efficiently and effectively. In order to learn English well and communicate with people better, we should learning much about morphology, use them reasonably. Because it is the foundation of learn English. Besides, morphology is useful for us to pursue research into negative prefixes. I hope that I can make some contribution to this field by reading and researching extensively and analyzing the morphology.ReferencesAdams, V. An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation[M]. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman Group Ltd, 1973:23-25.Algeo, J. The Voguish Use of non-, American Speech[J]. 1971:87-105.Barber, C. The English Language: A Historical Introduction[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993:45-46.Lipka, L. An Outline of English Lexicology: Lexical Structure, Word Semantics and Word-Formation[M]. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 1990:63-65. Mattews. Morphology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Foreign language teaching and research press, 2000.程焕福。