RG 1.84 DESIGN AND FABRICATION CODE CASE ACCEPTABILITY,ASME SECTION III,DIVISION 101-084r31
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:87.68 KB
- 文档页数:32
May 1996 WORKMANSHIP STANDARD FORSTAKING AND CONFORMAL COATING OFPRINTED WIRING BOARDS AND ELECTRONICASSEMBLIESNASANational Aeronautics andSpace AdministrationWashington, DC 20546PREFACEEffective Date: May 23, 1996 This document has been issued to make available to project managers a technical standard for staking and conformal coating of printed wiring boards and electronic assemblies.The document:Prescribes NASA's requirements, procedures and documenting requirements forstaking and conformal coating of printed wiring boards and electronic assemblies.These may be tailored to the program applications to obtain the most cost effective.best quality product.Describes basic considerations necessary to ensure reliable staking and conformalcoating of printed circuit boards and electronic assemblies.Establishes the responsibility for documentation of those fabrication and inspectionprocedures to be used for NASA work including supplier innovations, specialprocesses, and changes in technology. For the purpose of this document the termsupplier is defined as in-house NASA, NASA contractors and subtler contractors. Procuring NASA Enterprise Programs or Centers shall review this document for applicabilityto NASA contracts as well as for applicability to its internal activities.Questions concerning the application of this publication to specific procurements or requests should be referred to the NASA Enterprise Program or Center.While the document was originally prepared, reviewed and approved as a NASA Handbook (NHB), it is being released as a NASA Assurance Standard (NAS) (in accordance with current policy), without reformatting or restructuring or making changes in its text, to avoid delay in its release. Subsequent revisions of this document will be formatted to reflect its use as an NAS instead of an NHB.Comments and suggestions for improving this publication may be submitted using the form "NASA Standard Improvement Proposal." A copy of this form is included at the end of the document.This Standard cancels NASA Handbook (NHB) 5300.4 (3J), Workmanship Requirements for Staking and Conformal Coating of Printed Wiring Boards and Electronic Assemblies.Other processes such as soldering or cabling and harnessing, not covered by this document may be required to fabricate hardware involving staking and coating. The design, materials, and processes not covered shall be defined in engineering documentation.This document was formerly issued as an NHB and is now issued as an NAS.Frederick D. GregoryAssociate Administrator forSafety and Mission Assurance DISTRIBUTION:SDL1 (SIQ)NASA ASSURANCE STANDARDS FORFLIGHT HARDWARE WORKMANSHIP NASA Technical Standards can be found on the World Wide Web at URL address http://www//office/codeq/qdoc.pdf.Title Number Soldered Electrical Connections NASA-STD-8739.3 Crimping, Interconnecting Cables, Harnesses, and Wiring NASA-STD-8739.4 Fiber Optic Terminations, Cable Assemblies, and Installation NASA-STD-8739.5 Workmanship Standard for Staking and Conformal NAS 5300.4(3J-1) Coating of Printed Wiring Boards and Electronic AssembliesWorkmanship Standard for Surface Mount Technology NAS 5300.4(3M) Standard for Electrostatic Discharge Control NASA-STD-8739.7 (Excluding Electrically Initiated Explosive Devices)DOCUMENT REFERENCINGEach NASA Assurance Standard (NAS) is assigned its own identification number within the basic classification code. The numeric-alpha suffix within a parenthesis identifies the grouping of the publication such as NAS 5300.4~3A): this number indicates that this is the first "Standards" publication to be issued.When a part is revised, the suffix identification will be changed to indicate the revision number, such as NAS 5300.4(3A-2).In referencing or requesting any NAS, the complete specific NAS number must be used.PARAGRAPH REFERENCING1.The following shows the paragraph numbering system applicable to all assurancestandards for flight hardware workmanship.3 A 3 01 la(l)(a)Volume 3PartChapter 3Paragraph 301SubparagraphsThis numbering system provides for referencing any NAS requirement(paragraph) in any other NAS without the need for identifying the NAS numberor title.2.In Other NASA Documents. When it is necessary to reference an NASrequirement (paragraph) in any other NASA document, the specific NAS numberand paragraph number must be used together as follows: NAS 5300.4(3A-2),par. 3A301-la(l)(a), or paragraph 3A301-2b of NAS 5300.4(3A-2).TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE: (i)NASA ASSURANCE STANDARDS FOR FLIGHT HARDWARE WORKMANSHIP (iii)Document Referencing (iv)Paragraph Referencing (iv)CHAPTER 1: BASIC PRINCIPLES.......................................................................................1-1 3J100Applicability and Scope...................................................................................1-1 3J101Principles of Reliable Staking and Conformal Coating.....................................1-1 3J102General...........................................................................................................1-3 3J103Documentation...............................................................................................1-3 3J104Related Documents.........................................................................................1-3 3J105Approval of Departures From This Standard...................................................1-5 3J106Rework and Repair.........................................................................................1-5 3J107Definitions......................................................................................................1-5 CHAPTER 2: TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM...........................................2-1 3J200General..........................................................................................................2-1 3J201Vision Requirements......................................................................................2-1 3J202Certification Levels........................................................................................2-2 3J203Training Program Requirements.....................................................................2-2 3J204Documentation...............................................................................................2-3 3J205Maintenance of Certification Status................................................................2-3 3J206Training Resources.........................................................................................2-4 CHAPTER 3: FACILITIES, TOOLS, AND MATERIALS.....................................................3-1 3J300Safety.............................................................................................................3-1 3J301Facility Cleanliness.........................................................................................3-2 3J302Environmental Conditions..............................................................................3-2 3J303Electrostatic Discharge Requirements.............................................................3-3 3J304Tool and Equipment Control..........................................................................3-3 3J305Staking and Conformal Coating Material Selection.........................................3-5 3J306Material Storage.............................................................................................3-5 3J307Inspection Optics...........................................................................................3-6 3J308In-process Storage and Handling....................................................................3-6 3J309Solvents.........................................................................................................3-7 3J310Personnel Protection......................................................................................3-8 CHAPTER 4: CLEANLINESS REQUIREMENTS ...............................................................4-1 3J400General..........................................................................................................4-1 3J401Cleanliness Testing.........................................................................................4-1 3J402Testing Frequency..........................................................................................4-2 3J403Test Limits.....................................................................................................4-2 3J404Resistivity of Solvent Extract.........................................................................4-2 3J405Sodium Chloride Salt Equivalent Ionic Contamination Test............................4-3CHAPTER 5: PREPARATION FOR STAKING AND CONFORMAL COATING................5-1 3J500Surface Preparation........................................................................................5-1 3J501Masking.........................................................................................................5-1 3J502Priming..........................................................................................................5-2 3J503Material Preparation.......................................................................................5-2 3J504Witness Sample..............................................................................................5-3 3J505Preparation for Conformal Coating Control Specimens...................................5-3CHAPTER 6: STAKING........................................................................................................6-1 3J600General..........................................................................................................6-1 3J601Staking...........................................................................................................6-1CHAPTER 7: CONFORMAL COATING...............................................................................7-1 3J700General..........................................................................................................7-1 3J701Conformal Coating Application......................................................................7-1 3J702Curing............................................................................................................7-4 3J703Cleanup..........................................................................................................7-4 3J704Touchup/Rework...........................................................................................7-4CHAPTER 8: QUALlTY ASSURANCE................................................................................8-1 3J800General..........................................................................................................8-1 3J801Magnification Aids.........................................................................................8-1 3J802Documentation Verification............................................................................8-1 3J803Documentation Authorization.........................................................................8-2 3J804Verification of Tools, Equipment, and Materials.............................................8-2 3J805Acceptance/Rejection Criteria For Staking.....................................................8-3 3J806Inspection Methods for Staking......................................................................8-3 3J807Acceptance/Rejection Criteria for Conformal Coating.....................................8-4 3J808Inspection Methods for Conformal Coating....................................................8-5APPENDIX A- Acronyms..................................................................................................A-1APPENDIX B- Definitions.................................................................................................B-1APPENDIX C- Conformal Coating Problems.....................................................................C-1LIST OF FIGURESFigure Number Page3-1Working Zone--Temperature vs. Humidity Requirements............................3-2 6-1Typical Staking for Horizontally Mounted SleevelessCylindrical Parts..........................................................................................6-2 6-2Typical Staking for Horizontally Mounted SleevedCylindrical Parts..........................................................................................6-3 6-3Typical Staking of a Single Vertically Mounted Rectangular Part ................6-4 6-4Typical Staking for an Array of Vertically Mounted RectangularParts...........................................................................................................6-5 6-5Typical Wire Bundle Staking ......................................................................6-6 6-6Typical Wire Bundle Staking ......................................................................6-7 6-7Typical Toroid Staking ...............................................................................6-8 6-8Typical Vibration Isolation Staking .............................................................6-9 6-9Fastener Spot Staking...............................................................................6-10 7-1Spray Application........................................................................................7-2 7-2Conformal Coating - Bubbles .....................................................................7-5 7-3Conformal Coating - Scratches....................................................................7-6 7-4Conformal Coating - Lifting and Peeling .....................................................7-7 7-5Conformal Coating - Coverage Defects.......................................................7-8LIST OF TABLESTable Number Page 3-1Solvents and Cleaners..................................................................................3-7 4-1Cleanliness Test Values...............................................................................4-3 7-1Conformal Coating Thickness .....................................................................7-3CHAPTER 1: BASIC PRINCIPLES3J100APPLICABILITY AND SCOPE1.This publication is applicable to NASA programs involving staking andconformal coating applications for flight hardware, mission critical groundsupport equipment, and elements thereof, and wherever invoked contractually.2.This publication sets forth requirements for staking and conformal coating ofprinted wiring assemblies (PWA's).3.Special requirements may exist that are not in conformance with therequirements of this publication. Engineering documentation shall contain thedetails for such requirements, including modifications to existing equipment, andshall take precedence over appropriate portions of this publication whenapproved in writing by the procuring NASA Center.3J101PRINCIPLES OF RELIABLE STAKING AND CONFORMAL COATING1.Factors Controlling Reliability. Reliable staking and conformal coating resultsfrom proper design, control of equipment, materials, work environments, andcareful workmanship by trained and certified personnel.2.Fabrication Principles. All fabrication shall be performed to meet governingengineering documentation.3.Design Considerations for Staking. Staking material shall be specified on theapproved engineering documentation. The basic design considerations to assurereliable staking materials are as follows:a.The staking material shall be a noncorrosive, electrically insulativematerial, with dielectric properties (permittivity and dissipation factor) thatwill not change or adversely affect the performance characteristics of theparts being staked or their associated circuitry.b.The staking material selected shall provide adequate mechanical support toallow the item to survive vibration levels imposed during end-item use.Rigid staking material with a low thermal expansion coefficient is generallydesirable. For special cases where parts, sensitive to thermal/mechanicalstress are used, application of resilient materials may be required.c.The staking material must be compatible with, and adhere to, the printedwiring board (PWB) or substrate, the part staked, and the conformal coatingto be applied.d.The staking material shall exhibit hydrolytic and thermal stability underhigh-vacuum and thermal-vacuum conditions. The material shall meetprogram and contractual outgassing, offgassing, and flammabilityrequirements.e.The staking compound selected must not negate stress relief in part leads oron jumper wires.f.Staking material selection shall take into consideration the system operatingtemperatures and the material glass transition temperatures as specified onthe approved engineering documentation in order to minimize stress onparts and jumper wiring during operational thermal cycling.g.Staking material must not be applied to areas where induced stress willcause damage, such as under a dual-in-line package (DIP) integrated circuitor flat pack device.h.The staking material selected shall be curable under temperature conditionscompatible with the PWA on which it is located.4.Design Considerations for Conformal Coating. Conformal coating materialshall be specified on the approved engineering documentation. The basic design considerations to assure reliable conformal coatings are as follows:a.The conformal coating material and process selected shall be suited to thecomplexity of the assembly and shall be capable of covering the circuitry.b.The conformal coating material selected shall have dielectric properties thatwill meet the minimum circuit requirements in all anticipated environments.The material shall be noncorrosive and curable under conditions compatiblewith the parts on the PWA, including their temperature limits.c.The conformal coating material shall not cause damaging stress to the PWA,electronic assembly, or electrical interconnections.d.The coating material shall exhibit stability under high-vacuum and thermal-vacuum conditions. The material shall meet program and contractualoutgassing, offgassing, and flammability requirements.e.The coating material selected shall have maintainability properties (repairand rework) compatible with the parts and PWB or other substrates.f.The coating material selected shall be compatible with, and adherent to, allmaterials used in PWA's and electronic assemblies.g.The coating material selected shall be hydrolytically and thermally stable,as required.h.The coating thickness shall be within the range specified for each type ofmaterial unless otherwise specified.3J102GENERAL1.Implementation. NASA quality assurance personnel will advise and assistsuppliers, NASA personnel, and delegated agencies in the proper and effectiveimplementation of the provisions of this publication. Effective implementationincludes establishing a system that will identify each inspection point andprovide records.2.Changes in Requirements. When related requirements or changes inrequirements are specified, NASA quality assurance personnel will assure thatthe Government agency delegated to inspect at the supplier's site of fabricationhas received full instructions so that the work will be inspected to actual contractrequirements.3.Nonstandard Processes, Materials, or Parts. When the supplier intends to useprocesses, materials, or parts not covered by this publication, the supplier shalldocument the details of fabrication and inspection, including acceptance andrejection criteria, and shall provide appropriate test data. Such documentationshall be approved by the procuring NASA Center prior to use.4.If at any time during any phase of staking or conformal coating, a conditionshould arise that the operator feels may damage or in any way affect thereliability of the hardware, the work shall be halted until that condition has beenreviewed and resolved.5.The prime contractors are responsible for delegating the requirements herein totheir subtler suppliers as required.3J103DOCUMENTATION1.The supplier shall document the methods and procedures proposed to incorporatethe requirements of this Standard into the design, fabrication, and inspection ofstaking and conformal coating applications involved in the contract or purchaseorder.2.Documents required herein, except as specified by paragraph 3J102-3, shall besubmitted to the procuring NASA Center, or its designated representative, asrequired by the contract or purchase order. Applicable supplier staking andconformal coating program documents, or portions thereof, accepted on otherNASA contracts shall be included to avoid duplication of effort.3J104RELATED DOCUMENTS1.Applicable Specifications. Copies of the following specifications, whenrequired in connection with a specific procurement, can be obtained from theprocuring NASA Center or as directed by the contracting officer. Unlessotherwise specified, the issue in effect on the date of invitation for bids orrequests for proposal shall apply. The following related documents form a partof this publication to the extent specified herein.FEDERAL SPECIFICATIONSO-E-760Ethyl Alcohol (Ethanol) DenaturedAlcohol; Proprietary Solvents andSpecial Industrial SolventsTT-I-735Isopropyl AlcoholMILITARY SPECIFICATIONSMIL-I-46058Insulating Compound, Electrical(for Conformal Coating PrintedCircuit Assemblies)QPL-46058Qualified Product List forMIL-I-46058MIL-STD-1246Product Cleanliness Levels andContamination Control Program MIL-STD45662Calibration Systems RequirementNASA SPECIFICATIONSNASA-STD-8739.9Standard for ElectrostaticDischarge Control (ExcludingElectrically Initiated ExplosiveDevices)NHB 8060.1Flammability, Odor, Offgassing andCompatibility Requirements andTest Procedures for Materials inEnvironments that SupportCombustionNHB 5300.4(1G)NASA Assurance Terms andDefinitionsINDUSTRY SPECIFICATIONSASTM-D-2240Rubber Property, DurometerHardness Standard Method for ASTM-E-595Standard Test Method for TotalMass Loss and Collected VolatileCondensable Materials FromOutgassing in a VacuumEnvironmentOSHA Standards Occupational Safety and HealthAdministration (OSHA), Title 29,Code of Federal Regulations(CFR), Part 1910, OccupationalSafety and Health Standards.3J105APPROVAL OF DEPARTURES FROM THIS STANDARD1.Departures from this publication require written approval from the cognizantNASA contracting officer. The supplier is responsible for assuring that anydepartures from this publication are evaluated by, coordinated with, andsubmitted to the procuring NASA Center for approval prior to use orimplementation.2.For in-house NASA projects, this publication requires written approval by the in-house NASA project management to deviate from the provisions herein.3J106REWORK AND REPAIR1.Rework. Rework is permissible unless excluded by other provisions of thecontract. All rework shall meet the requirements of this publication and approvedengineering documentation.2.Repair is not Rework. Repairs shall be made only in compliance withapplicable contractual requirements and after authorization for each incident bythe procuring NASA Center. Repairs shall be accomplished using documentedmethods previously approved by the procuring NASA Center. For in-houseNASA projects, repairs shall be authorized for each incident by the Project Officeand Quality Management.3J107DEFINITIONSAcronyms are found in Appendix A. Definitions are found in NHB 5300.4(1G).Unique definitions for this Standard are listed in Appendix B.CHAPTER 2: TRAINING AND CERTIFICATIONPROGRAM3J200GENERAL1.The supplier is responsible for maintaining a documented training program thatmeets the requirements of this Standard.2.The supplier shall assure that design personnel are familiar with the requirementsof this Standard, staking and conformal coating techniques, and other pertinentrequirements of the contract. The supplier shall implement and document atraining program that provides the necessary training of staking and conformalcoating fabrication and inspection personnel in techniques, use of equipment,and procedures pertinent to their responsibilities in performance of the contractrequirements. The supplier is responsible for certifying and maintaining thecertification of each individual who fabricates, inspects, or instructs.3.Operators, inspectors, and instructors shall be qualified to fulfill all requirementsof this Standard involved in their assigned tasks. Demonstration of proficiencyand understanding of the requirements is a requisite for certification andrecertification. Evidence of certification status shall be maintained in the workarea.3J201VISION REQUIREMENTS1.The supplier is responsible for ensuring that all personnel who perform or inspectstaking or conformal coating applications meet the following vision testrequirements as a prerequisite to training, certification, and recertification. Thevision requirements may be met with corrected vision (personal eyeglasses). Thevision tests shall be administered every 2 years by a qualified eye examiner,accepted by the procuring supplier, using standard instruments and techniques.Results of the visual examinations shall be maintained and available for review.2.The following are minimum vision requirements:a.Far Vision. SnellenChart20/50.b.Near Vision. Jaeger 1 at 355.6 mm (14 inches), or reduced Snellen 20/20,or equivalent.c.Color Vision. Ability to distinguish red; green, blue, and yellow colors asprescribed in Dvorine Charts, Ishihara Plates, or AO-HRR Tests.NOTE: A PRACTICAL TEST, USING COLOR CODED WIRES AND/ORCOLOR CODED ELECTRICAL PARTS, AS APPLICABLE, IS ACCEPTABLEFOR COLOR VISION TESTING.3J202CERTIFICATION LEVELS1.Level A NASA instructors are certified by the NASA Training and CertificationBoard. Level A NASA instructors have the authority to train Level B instructors,operators, and inspectors. Upon successful course completion, a certificate shallbe issued.2.Certification of Level B instructors shall be provided by the supplier based onsuccessful completion of training by a Level A NASA instructor. Level Binstructors are authorized to train operators and inspectors employed at theirorganization and subtler contractors.3.Certification of inspectors shall be provided by the supplier based on successfulcompletion of training by a Level A NASA instructor or Level B supplierinstructor. An inspector is trained and certified to inspect for conformance withthe requirements of this Standard.4.Certification of operators shall be provided by the supplier based on successfulcompletion of training by a Level A NASA instructor or Level B supplierinstructor. An operator is trained and certified to apply polymeric materials inconformance with the requirements of this Standard. When operators arecertified to perform limited operations or processes, it shall be stated on thecertification card.3J203TRAINING PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS1.The supplier is responsible for training and certification of operators andinspectors in the staking and conformal coating processes and associatedprocessing equipment.2.The supplier training program documentation shall be submitted to the procuringNASA Center as directed by the contract. A NASA Generic Staking andConformal Coating Training Plan from the NASA Training Centers is availablefor use as a guideline.3.The training program shall:a.Identify the criteria for qualification and certification of Level B instructors,inspectors, and operators.b.Document the methods and procedures proposed to fulfill the requirementsof this Standard.c.Utilize visual standards consisting of satisfactory work samples or visualaids that clearly illustrate the quality characteristics of polymericapplications applicable to the contract.。
CAN/CSA-A5-93 Portland CementCementCAN/CSA-A8-93 MasonryCAN/CSA-A362-93 Blended Hydraulic CementA23.1-94 Concrete Materials and Methods of ConcreteConstructionA23.2-94 Methods of Test for ConcreteA23.1-00/A23.2-00 Concrete Materials and Methods of ConcreteConstruction / Methods of Test for ConcreteA23.3-94 Design of Concrete StructuresA60.1-M1976 (R1992) Vitrified Clay Pipe (withdrawn)*A60.3-M1976 (R1992) Vitrified Clay Pipe Joints (withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-A82.1-M87 (R1999) Burned Clay Brick (Solid Masonry Units Made FromClay or Shale)A82.3-M1978 (R1998) Calcium Silicate (Sand-Lime) Building BrickA82.4-M1978 (R1998) Structural Clay Load-Bearing Wall Tile/A82.5-M1978 (R1998) Structural Clay Non-Load-Bearing Tile/A82.6-M1978 (R1998) Standard Methods for Samples and TestingStructural Clay TileCAN3-A82.8-M78 (R1999) Hollow Clay BrickCAN/CSA-A82.27-M91 Gypsum Board (withdrawn)*A82.30-M1980 (R1992) Interior Furring, Lathing and Gypsum Plastering(withdrawn)*A82.31-M1980 Gypsum Board Application (withdrawn)*A82.56-M1976 Aggregate for Masonry Mortar (withdrawn)*CAN3-A93-M82 (R1998) Natural Airflow Ventilators for BuildingsA101-M1983 Thermal Insulation, Mineral Fibre, for Buildings(withdrawn)**(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextA123.1-M1979 (R1992) Asphalt Shingles Surfaced with Mineral Granules(withdrawn)*A123.1-98Asphalt Shingles Made From Organic Felt andSurfaced with Mineral GranulesA123.5-98 Asphalt Shingle Made from Glass Felt and Surfacedwith Mineral GranulesA123.2-M1979 (R2001) Asphalt Coated Roofing SheetsA123.3-M1979 Asphalt or Tar Saturated Roofing FeltA123.3-98 Asphalt Saturated Organic Roofing FeltA123.4-M1979 Bitumen for Use in Construction of Built-Up RoofCoverings and Dampproofing and WaterproofingSystemsA123.4-98 Asphalt for Use in Construction of Built-Up RoofCoverings and Waterproofing SystemsCAN/CSA-A123.5-M90 Asphalt Shingles Made from Glass Felt and Surfacedwith Mineral GranulesA123.17-1963 (R2001) Asphalt-Saturated Felted Glass-Fibre Mat for Use inConstruction of Built-Up RoofsCAN3-A123.51-M85 (R2001) Asphalt Shingle Application on Roof Slopes 1:3 andSteeperCAN3-A123.52-M85 (R2001) Asphalt Shingle Application on Roof Slopes 1:6 toLess than 1:3A165.1-94 Concrete Masonry UnitsA165.2-94 Concrete Brick Masonry UnitsA165.3-94 Prefaced Concrete Masonry UnitsA165.4-94 Autoclaved Cellular UnitsCAN/CSA-A220.0-M91 Performance of Concrete Roof TilesCAN/CSA-A220.1-M91 Installation of Concrete Roof TilesCAN/CSA-A247-M86 (R1996) Insulating Fibreboard*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-A257 Series-M92 (R1998)CAN/CSA-A257.0-M92 Methods for Determining Physical Properties ofCircular Concrete Pipe, Manhole Sections, CatchBasins, and FittingsCAN/CSA-A257.1-M92 Circular Concrete Culvert, Storm Drain, Sewer Pipeand FittingsCAN/CSA-A257.2-M92 Reinforced Circular Concrete Culvert, Storm Drain,Sewer Pipe and FittingsCAN/CSA-A257.3-M92 Joints for Circular Concrete Sewer and Culvert Pipe,Manhole Sections, and Fittings Using RubberGasketsCAN/CSA-A257.4-M92 Precast Reinforced Circular Concrete ManholeSections, Catch Basins, and FittingsCAN3-A266.1-M78 Air-Entraining Admixtures for Concrete (withdrawn)* CAN3-A266.2-M78 Chemical Admixtures for Concrete (withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-A277-90 (R1998) Procedures for Certification of Factory-Built HousesA277-01 Procedures for Certification of Factory-Built Houses CAN/CSA-A324-M88 (R2001) Clay Flue LinersA371-94 (R1999) Masonry Construction for BuildingsCAN/CSA-A405-M87 Design and Construction of Masonry Chimneys andFireplacesCAN3-A438-M84 (R1996) Concrete Construction for Housing and SmallBuildingsA438-01 Concrete Construction for Housing and SmallBuildingsCAN/CSA-A440-M90WindowsCAN/CSA-A440.1-M1990User Selection Guide to CSA Standard CAN/CSA-A440-M90, WindowsA440-00Windows*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextA440.1-00 User Selection Guide to CSA Standard A440-00,WindowsA440.2-M1991Energy Performance Evaluation of Windows andSliding Glass DoorsA440.3-M1991User Guide to A440.2-92 Energy PerformanceEvaluation of Windows and Sliding Glass DoorsA440.2-98Energy Performance of Windows and OtherFenestration SystemsA440.3-98User Guide to CSA Standard A440.2-98 EnergyPerformance of Windows and Other FenestrationSystemsA440.4-98Window and Door InstallationCAN/CSA-B44-94 Safety Code for Elevators, Escalators, Dumbwaiters,Moving Walks and Freight Platform LiftsB44-00 Safety Code for ElevatorsB45 Series-94B45.0-94 General Requirements for Plumbing Fixtures(withdrawn)*B45.1-94 Ceramic Plumbing Fixtures (withdrawn)*B45.2-94 Enamelled Cast Iron Plumbing Fixtures(withdrawn)*B45.3-94 Porcelain-Enamelled Steel Plumbing Fixtures(withdrawn)*B45.4-94 Stainless Steel Plumbing Fixtures (withdrawn)*B45.5-94 Plastic Plumbing Fixtures (withdrawn)*B45.6-94 Non Re-circulating Toilets and Waste Holding Tanksfor Use in Recreational Vehicles (withdrawn)*B45.7-94 Self-Contained, Recirculating, Chemically ControlledToilets for Use in Recreational Vehicles(withdrawn)*B45.0-02 General Requirements for Plumbing FixturesB45.1-02 Ceramic Plumbing FixturesB45.2-02 Enamelled Cast Iron Plumbing FixturesB45.3-02 Porcelain-Enamelled Steel Plumbing FixturesB45.4-02 Stainless Steel Plumbing FixturesB45.5-02 Plastic Plumbing Fixtures*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextB45.6-02 Non Re-circulating Toilets and Waste Holding Tanksfor Use in Recreational VehiclesB45.7-02 Self-Contained, Recirculating, Chemically ControlledToilets for Use in Recreational VehiclesB45.8-02 Terrazzo Plumbing FixturesB45.9-02 Macerating Systems and Related ComponentsCAN/CSA-B52-95 Mechanical Refrigeration Code (withdrawn)*B52-99 Mechanical Refrigeration CodeCAN/CSA-B64 Series-94 (R1999)CAN/CSA-B64.0-94 Definitions, General Requirements, and TestMethods for Vacuum Breakers and BackflowPreventersCAN/CSA-B64.1.1-94 Vacuum Breakers, Atmospheric Type (AVB)CAN/CSA-B64.1.2-94 Vacuum Breakers, Pressure Type (PVB)CAN/CSA-B64.2-94 Vacuum Breakers, Hose Connection TypeCAN/CSA-B64.2.1-94 Vacuum Breakers, Hose Connection Type (HCVB)with Manual Draining FeatureCAN/CSA-B64.2.2-94 Vacuum Breakers, Hose Connection Type (HCVB)with Automatic Draining FeatureCAN/CSA-B64.3-94 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve TypeAtmospheric Port (DACP)CAN/CSA-B64.4-94 Backflow Preventers, Reduced Pressure PrincipleType (RP)CAN/CSA-B64.5-94 Backflow Preventers, Double Check Valve Type(DCVA)CAN/CSA-B64.6-94 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve Type (DuC) CAN/CSA-B64.7-94 Vacuum Breakers, Laboratory Faucet Type (LFVP) CAN/CSA-B64.8-94 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve Type withIntermediate Vent (DuCV)B64.0-01Definitions, General Requirements, and TestMethods for Vacuum Breakers and BackflowPreventersB64.1.1-01 Vacuum Breakers, Atmospheric Type (AVB)B64.1.2-01 Vacuum Breakers, Pressure Type (PVB)B64.2-01 Vacuum Breakers, Hose Connection Type (HCVB)B64.2.1-01 Vacuum Breakers, Hose Connection Type (HCVB)with Manual Draining Feature*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextB64.2.1.1-01 Vacuum Breakers, Hose Connection Dual CheckType (HCDVB)B64.2.2-01 Vacuum Breakers, Hose Connection Type (HCVB)with Automatic Draining FeatureB64.3-01 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve Type withAtmospheric Port (DCAP)B64.3.1-01 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve Type withAtmospheric Port for Carbonators (DCAPC)B64.4-01 Backflow Preventers, Reduced Pressure PrincipleType (RP)B64.4.1-01 Backflow Preventers, Reduced Pressure PrincipleType for Fire Systems (RPF)B64.5-01 Backflow Preventers, Double Check Valve Type(DCVA)B64.5.1-01 Backflow Preventers, Double Check Valve Type forFire Systems (DCVAF)B64.6-01 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve Type (DuC)B64.6.1-01 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve Type for FireSystems (DuCF)B64.7-01 Vacuum Breakers, Laboratory Faucet Type (LFVB)B64.8-01 Backflow Preventers, Dual Check Valve Type withIntermediate Vent (DuCV)B64.9-01 Backflow Preventers, Single Check Valve Type forFire Systems (SCVAF)CAN/CSA-B64.10-94 (R1999) Manual for the Selection, Installation, Maintenanceand Field Testing of Backflow Prevention DevicesB64.10-01/B64.10.1-01 Manual for the Selection and Installation of BackflowPrevention Devices/Manual for the Maintenance andField Testing of Backflow Prevention DevicesCAN/CSA-B66-M90 (R1998) Prefabricated Septic Tanks and Sewage HoldingTanksB66-00 Prefabricated Septic Tanks and Sewage HoldingTanksB67-1972 (R1996) Lead Service Pipe, Waste Pipe, Traps, Bends andAccessoriesCAN/CSA-B70-M91 Cast Iron Soil Pipe, Fittings and Means of Joining(withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-B70-97 Cast Iron Soil Pipe, Fittings and Means of Joining*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextB111-1974 (R1998) Wire Nails, Spikes and StaplesB125-93 Plumbing Fittings (withdrawn)*B125-01 Plumbing FittingsB127.1-M1977 Components for Use in Asbestos Cement Drain,Waste and Vent Systems (withdrawn)*B127.1-99 Asbestos Cement Drain, Waste Vent Pipe and PipeFittingsB127.2-M1977 (R1997) Components for Use in Asbestos Cement BuildingSewer SystemsCAN/CSA-B137.1-M89 Polyethylene Pipe, Tubing and Fittings for ColdWater Pressure ServicesB137.2-93 PVC Injection-Moulded Gasketed Fittings forPressure ApplicationsB137.3-93 Rigid Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Pipe for PressureApplicationsCAN/CSA-B137.5-M89 Cross-Linked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing Systemsfor Pressure ApplicationsB137.6-M1983 CPVC Pipe, Tubing and Fittings for Hot and ColdWater Distribution SystemsB137.7-M1983 (R1995) Polybutylene (PB) Pipe for Cold Water DistributionSystemsCAN/CSA-B137.8-M92 Polybutylene (PB) Piping for Pressure Applications CAN/CSA-B137.9-M91 Polyethylene/Aluminum/Polyethylene CompositePressure Pipe Systems*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-B137.10-M91 Crosslinked Polyethylene/Aluminum CrosslinkedPolyethylene Composite Pressure Pipe SystemsB137.11-93 Polypropylene (PP-R) Pipe and Fittings for PressureApplicationsB137 Series-02B137.0-02 Definitions, General Requirements, and Methods ofTesting for Thermoplastic Pressure PipingB137.1-02 Polyethylene Pipe, Tubing and Fittings for ColdWater Pressure ServicesB137.2-02 PVC Injection-Moulded Gasketed Fittings forPressure ApplicationsB137.3-02 Rigid Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Pipe for PressureApplicationsB137.4-02 Polyethylene Piping Systems for Gas ServicesB137.4.1-02 Electrofusion-Type Polyethylene Fittings for GasServicesB137.5-02 Cross-Linked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing Systemsfor Pressure ApplicationsB137.6-02 CPVC Pipe, Tubing and Fittings for Hot and ColdWater Distribution SystemsB137.8-02 Polybutylene (PB) Piping for Pressure ApplicationsB137.9-02 Polyethylene/Aluminum/Polyethylene CompositePressure Pipe SystemsB137.10-02 Crosslinked Polyethylene/Aluminum CrosslinkedPolyethylene Composite Pressure Pipe SystemsB137.11-02 Polypropylene (PP-R) Pipe and Fittings for PressureApplicationsB137.12-02 Polyamide Piping For Gas ServicesB158.1-1976 (R1992) Cast Brass Solder Joint Drainage, Waste and VentFittings (withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-B181.1-M90 ABS Drain, Waste, and Vent Pipe and Pipe Fittings(withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-B181.2-M90 PVC Drain, Waste, and Vent Pipeand Pipe Fittings (withdrawn)*Polyolefin Laboratory Drainage SystemsCAN/CSA-B181.3-M86(R1998)*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-B182.1-M96 Plastic Drain and Sewer Pipe and Pipe FittingsCAN/CSA-B182.2-M90 PVC Sewer Pipe and Fittings (PSM Type)CAN/CSA-B182.4-M92 Profile (Ribbed) PVC Sewer Pipe and FittingsCAN/CSA-B182.6-M92 Profile Polyethylene Sewer Pipe and FittingsB181.1-02 ABS Drain, Waste, and Vent Pipe and Pipe FittingsB181.2.02 PVC Drain, Waste, and Vent Pipe and Pipe FittingsB181.3-02 Polyolefin Laboratory Drainage SystemsB181.5-02 Coextruded ABS/PVC Drain, Waste, and Vent PipeB182.1-02 Plastic Drain and Sewer Pipe and Pipe FittingsB182.2-02 PVC Sewer Pipe and Fittings (PSM Type)B182.4-02 Profile (Ribbed) PVC Sewer Pipe and FittingsB182.6-02 Profile Polyethylene Sewer Pipe and FittingsB182.7-02 Multilayer PVC Sewer Pipe (PSM Type) HavingReprocessed-Recycled ContentB182.8-02 Profile Polyethylene Storm Sewer and Drainage Pipeand FittingsB182.11-02 Recommended Practice for the Installation ofThermoplastic Drain, Storm and Sewer Pipe andFittingsB242-M1980 (R1998) Grove and Shoulder Type Mechanical PipeCouplingsB272-93 (R2000) Prefabricated Self-Sealing Roof Vent FlashingsCAN/CSA-B281-M90 Aluminum Drain, Waste, and Vent Pipe andComponentsB355-94 Lifts for Persons with Physical DisabilitiesB355-00 Lifts for Persons with Physical Disabilities*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextB356-M1979 (1998) Water Pressure Reducing Valves for DomesticWater Supply SystemsB356-00 Backflow Preventers and Water Pressure ReducingValvesCAN/CSA-B365-M91 (R1998) Installation Code for Solid-Fuel Burning Appliancesand EquipmentB365-01 Installation Code for Solid-Fuel Burning Appliancesand EquipmentCAN/CSA-B366.1-M87 Solid Fuel-Fired Central Heating Appliances(withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-B366.1-M91 Solid Fuel-Fired Central Heating AppliancesCAN/CSA-B602-M90 Mechanical Couplings for Drain, Waste, and VentPipe and Sewer Pipe (withdrawn)*B602-99 Mechanical Couplings for Drain, Waste, and VentPipe and Sewer PipeC22.2 No.0.3-96 Test Methods for Electrical Wires and CablesC22.2 No.0.3-01 Test Methods for Electrical Wires and CablesC22.2 No.113-M1984 (R1999) Fans and VentilatorsC22.2 No.141-M1985 (R1999) Unit Equipment for Emergency LightingC22.2 No.141-02 Unit Equipment for Emergency LightingC22.2 No.211.0-M1984 (R1999) General Requirements and Methods of Testing forNonmetallic ConduitOverhead SystemsCAN/CSA-C22.3 No.1-M87(R2001)C22.3 No. 1-01 Overhead SystemsCAN/CSA-C88-M90 (R1999) Power Transformers and ReactorsCAN/CSA-C260-M90 (R1997) Rating for the Performance of ResidentialMechanical Ventilating EquipmentCAN/CSA-C282-M89 (R1996) Emergency Electrical Power Supply for BuildingsCAN/CSA-C282-00 Emergency Electrical Power Supply for Buildings*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-C439-88 (R1998) Standard Methods of Test for Rating thePerformance of Heat Recovery VentilatorsCAN/CSA-C439-00 Standard Methods of Test for Rating thePerformance of Heat/Energy- Recovery Ventilators CAN/CSA-C445-M92 (R1998) Design and Installation of Earth Energy Heat PumpSystems for Residential and Other Small BuildingsC447-94 (R1999) Design and Installation of Earth Energy Heat PumpSystems for Commercial and Institutional Buildings CAN/CSA-F280-M90 (R1999) Determining the Required Capacity of ResidentialSpace Heating and Cooling AppliancesCAN/CSA-F379.1-88 (R1999) Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems (Liquid to LiquidHeat Transfer)CAN/CSA-F383-87 (R1998) Installation Code for Solar Domestic Hot WaterSystemsCAN/CSA-G40.20-M92General Requirements for Rolled or WeldedStructural Quality SteelCAN/CSA-G40.21-M92Structural Quality SteelG40.20-98General Requirements for Rolled or WeldedStructural Quality SteelG40.21-98Structural Quality SteelG164-M1981 Hot Dip Galvanising of Irregularly Shaped Articles(withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-G164-M92 (R1998) Hot Dip Galvanising of Irregularly Shaped ArticlesG401-93 Corrugated Steel Pipe ProductsG401-01 Corrugated Steel Pipe ProductsCAN/CSA-O80 Series-97CAN/CSA-O80.0-97 Wood PreservationCAN/CSA-O80.M1-97 Guide for Purchasers and Specifiers of TreatedWoodCAN/CSA-O80.M3-97 Standard for Quality Control Procedures for Wood-Preserving Plants*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-O80.1-97 Preservative Treatment of All Timber Products byPressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.2-97 Preservative Treatment of Lumber, Timber, BridgeTies and Mine Ties by Pressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.3-97 Preservative Treatment of Piles by PressureProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.4-97 Preservative Treatment of Poles by PressureProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.5-97 Preservative Treatment of Posts by PressureProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.6-97 Preservative Treatment of Crossties and Switch Tiesby Pressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.7-97 Preservative Treatment of Western Red Cedar,Northern White Cedar, and Alaska Yellow CedarIncised Pole Butts by the Thermal ProcessCAN/CSA-O80.8-97 Preservative Treatment of Western Red Cedar, andAlaska Yellow Cedar Poles by the Full LengthThermal ProcessCAN/CSA-O80.9-97 Preservative Treatment of Plywood by PressureProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.10-97 Preservative Treatment of Lodgepole Pine Poles bythe Full Length Thermal ProcessCAN/CSA-O80.11-97 Preservative Treatment of Wood Blocks for Floorsand Platforms by Pressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.14-97 Pressure Preserved Wood for Highway Construction CAN/CSA-O80.15-97 Preservative Treatment of Wood for BuildingFoundation Systems, Basements and Crawl Spacesby Pressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.16-97 Preservative Treatment of Pole Building Constructionand Wood Used on Farms by Pressure Processes CAN/CSA-O80.18-97 Pressure-Treated Piles and Timbers in MarineConstructionCAN/CSA-O80.20-97 Fire-Retardant Treatment of Lumber by PressureProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.25-97 Preservative Treatment of Sawn Crossarms byPressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.26-97 Preservative Treatment of Sawn Crossarms by Non-pressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.27-97 Fire-Retardant Treatment of Plywood by PressureProcesses*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-O80.28-97 Preservative Treatment of Coast Douglas Fir andWestern Hemlock Structural Glued-LaminatedMembers and Laminations before Gluing, byPressure ProcessesCAN/CSA-O80.29-97 Pressure Treatment of Lumber for Use in Harvesting,Storage, and Transportation of Foodstuffs for HumanConsumptionCAN/CSA-O80.32-97 Preservative Treatment of Decking Lumber withWater-borne Preservatives by Pressure Processes CAN/CSA-O80.34-97 Pressure Preservative Treatment of Lumber andTimbers with Borates for Use Out of Ground Contactand Continuously Protected from Liquid WaterCAN/CSA-O80.201-97 Standard for Hydrocarbon Solvents for Preservatives CAN/CSA-O80.202-97 Standard for Creosote for Brush Treatment of fieldCutsCAN/CSA-O80.203-97 Preservative Treatment with Ammoniacal CopperZinc Arsenate (ACZA)CAN/CSA-O80.204-97 Preservative Treatment with Chromated CopperArsenate-Polyethylene Glycal (CCA-PEG)CAN/CSA-O80.205-97 Preservative Treatment with Chromated CopperArsenate-Oil Emulsion System (CCA-Oil)CAN/CSA-O80.206-97 Pressure Preservative Treatment with ChromatedCopper Arsenate-Water Repellent (CCA-WR)PreservativeO86.1-94 Engineering Design in Wood (Limit States Design)O86-01 Engineering Design in WoodO115-M1982 (R2001) Hardwood and Decorative PlywoodO118.1-97 Western Cedar Shakes and ShinglesO118.2-M1981 Eastern White Cedar ShinglesO121-M1978 (R1998) Douglas Fir PlywoodCAN/CSA.O122-M89 (R1999) Structural Glued-Laminated Timber*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextO132.2- M1977 Wood Doors (withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-O132.2 Series-90 (R1998)CAN/CSA-O132.2.0-90 General Requirements for Wood Flush DoorsCAN/CSA-O132.2.1-90 Solid Core Wood Flush DoorsCAN/CSA-O132.2.2-90 Hollow Core Wood Flush DoorsCAN/CSA-O132.2.3-90 Testing and Inspection Requirements for WoodFlush DoorsCAN/CSA-O132.2.4-90 Hardware Locations for Wood Flush DoorsCAN/CSA-O141-91 (R1999) Softwood LumberO151-M1978 (R1998) Canadian Softwood PlywoodO153-M1980 (R1998) Poplar PlywoodCAN/CSA-O177-M89 (R1998) Qualification Code for Manufacturers of StructuralGlued-Laminated TimberCAN3-O188.1-M78 Interior Mat-Formed Wood Particleboard(withdrawn)*CAN/CSA-O325.0-92 (R1998) Construction SheathingO437 Series-93 (R2001)O437.0-93 OSB and WaferboardO437.1-93 Test Methods for OSB and WaferboardO437.2-93 Evaluation of Binder Systems for OSB andWaferboard*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-S16.1-94 (R2000) Limit States Design of Steel StructuresS16-01 Limit States Design of Steel StructuresCAN/CSA-S37-M86 Antennas, Towers and Antenna SupportingStructuresS37-01 Antennas, Towers and Antenna SupportingStructuresS136-94 (R2001) Cold Formed Steel Structural MembersCAN3-S157-M83 (R2000) Strength Design in AluminumCAN3-S304-M84 (R1997) Masonry Design for BuildingsS304.1-94 (R2001) Masonry Design for Buildings (Limit States Design)S307-M1980 (R2001) Load Test Procedure for Wood Roof Trusses forHouses and Small BuildingsCAN3-S367-M81 (R1998) Air Supported StructuresCAN/CSA-S406-92 (R1998) Construction of Preserved Wood FoundationsCAN/CSA-S413-94 (R2000) Parking StructuresCAN/CSA-Z32.4-M86 Essential Electrical Systems for HospitalsCAN/CSA-Z32-99 Electrical Safety and Essential Electrical Systems inHealth Care FacilitiesCAN/CSA-Z91-M90 Safety Code for Window Cleaning OperationsZ91-02 Health and Safety Code for Suspended EquipmentOperationsCAN/CSA-Z240 MH Series-92(R2001)CAN/CSA-Z240.0.1-92 Definitions and General Requirements for MobileHomes*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green TextCAN/CSA-Z240.1.1-92 Vehicular Requirements for Mobile HomesCAN/CSA-Z240.2.1-92 Structural Requirements for Mobile HomesCAN/CSA-Z240.3.1-M92 Plumbing Requirements for Mobile HomesCAN/CSA-Z240.4.1-92 Installation Requirements for Gas-BurningAppliances in Mobile HomesCAN/CSA-Z240.5.1-92 Oil Installation Requirements for Mobile HomesCAN/CSA-Z240.8.1-M92 Light Duty WindowsCAN/CSA-Z240.9.1-92 Requirements for Load Calculations and DuctDesign for Heating and Cooling of Mobile HomesCAN/CSA-Z240.10.1-94 Site Preparation, Foundation and Anchorage ofMobile HomesCAN/CSA-Z241 Series-92 (R1998)CAN/CSA-Z241.0-92 Definitions and General Safety Requirements forPark Model TrailersCAN/CSA-Z241.1-92 Vehicular Requirements for Park Model TrailersCAN/CSA-Z241.2-92 Structural Requirements for Park Model TrailersCAN/CSA-Z241.3-92 Plumbing System Requirements for Park ModelTrailersCAN/CSA-Z241.4-92 Installation Requirements for Propane Appliancesand Equipment in Park Model TrailersCAN/CSA-Z241.5-92 Electrical Requirements for Park Model TrailersCAN/CSA-Z305.1-92 Nonflammable Medical Gas Piping SystemsCAN/CSA-Z317.2-M91 (R1998) Special Requirements for Heating, Ventilation andAir Conditioning (HVAC) Systems in Health CareFacilitiesCAN/CSA-Z317.2-01 Special Requirements for Heating, Ventilation, andAir Conditioning (HVAC) Systems in Health CareFacilities*(withdrawn): This standard is withdrawn, but is still referenced in Canadian Legislation. In cases where a newer edition replaces a withdrawn standard we have listed both.Standards Highlighted in Green Text。
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONRevisom 1 July 1977x REGULATORY GUIDEOFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENTREGULATORY GUIDE 1.115PROTECTION AGAINST LOW-TRAJECTORY TURBINE MISSILES A.INTRODUCTION•General Design Criterion 4, "Environmental and Missile Design Bases," of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50, "Licensing of Production and Utiliza tion Facilities," requires, in part, that structures, systems, and components important to safety be ap propriately protected, against the effects of missiles that might result from equipment failures. Failures that could occur in the large steam turbines of the main turbine-generator sets have the potential for producing large high-energy missiles. This guide describes methods acceptable to the NRC staff for protecting safety-related structures, systems, and components against low-trajectory missiles resulting from turbine failure by appropriate orientation and placement of the turbine-generator set. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has been con sulted concerning this guide and has concurred in the regulatory position.B. DISCUSSIONAlthough there is little information available on failures of large turbines, cumulative failure data based on operating history for conventional plants' indicate that the protection of safety-related portions of nuclear power plants from turbine missiles is an appropriate safety consideration. The two broad categories of t urbine failures are usually referred to as design overspeed failures and destructive overspeed failures. Missiles resulting from design overspeed failures are the result of brittle fracture of turbine blade wheels or portions of the turbine rotor itself. Failures of this type Ican occur dduring startup or nor*•Lines i ndicate substantive changes from previous issue. 'Bush, S. H., "Probability of Damage to Nuclear Components," Nuclear Safety, Vol. 14, No. 3, May-June, 1973.mal operation. Missiles resulting from destructive -overspeed -failures would be generated7-iftie overspeed protection system malfunctions and the turbine speed increases to a point at which the low pressure wheels or rotor will undergo ductile failure. The kinetic energy of ejected missiles can b'e sufficient to damage even substantial reinforced concrete slabs and panels. Thus turbine missiles have the potential for damaging safety-related structures, systems, and components of the plant.Missiles from a turbine failure can be divided intotwo groups: "high-trajectory" missiles, which areejected upward through the turbine casing and may cause damage if the falling missile strikes an essential system and "low-trajectory" or "direct" missiles, which are ejected from the turbine casing directly toward an essential system. This guide outlines accep table methods of protection against low-trajectory turbine missiles.Consideration of turbine missile protection is rele vant for essential systems, i.e., those structures, systems, and components necessary to ensure: 1. The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary,2. The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a cold shutdown condition, or3. The capability to prevent accidents that could result in potential offsite exposures that are a signifi cant fraction of the guideline exposures of 10 CFR Part 100, "Reactor Site Criteria."The potential consequences of turbine missiles in clude direct effects (e.g., damage to the spent fuel storage pool) as well as indirect effects (e.g., impair ment of vital control room functions). In either case, it is necessary to show that the risk from turbine mis-USNRC REGULATORY GUIDESComments should be sent to the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regu latory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Regulatory Guidets are issued to describe and make available to the public methods Branch.acceptable to the NRC staff of implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations, to delineate techniques used by the staff in evaluating sOecific problems The guides are issued in th? following ten broad divisions: or postulated accidents, or to provide guidance to applicants. Regulatory Guides are not substitutes for regulations, and compliance with them is not required. 1. Power Reactors6. ProductsMethods and solutions differ.ent from those 4bt out in the guides will be accept- 2. Research and Test Reactors 7. Transportationable if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance3. Fuels and Materials Facilities 8. Occupational Health of a it orolicens by t ommissin.4. Environmental and Siting9. Antitrust Review apermit o r liense by the Commission. 5. Materials and Plant Protection10. GeneralComments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at allRequests for single copies of issued guides (which may be reproduced) or for place times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and ment on an automatic distribution list for single copies of future guides in specific to reflect new information or experience. This guide was revised as a result of divisions should be made in writing to the US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, substantive comments received from the public and additional staff review.Washington, D.C. 20555. Attention: Director. Division of Document Control.siles is acceptably small, either because design features ate provided to prevent damage or because the probability of a strike by a turbine missile is suf ficiently low. Turbine orientation and placement,shielding, quality assurance in design and fabrication, inspection and testing programs, and overspeed protection systems are the principal means of safeguarding against turbine missiles. The first of these, turbine orientation and placement, provides a high degree of confidence that low-trajectory missiles resulting from turbine failures will not damage essen tial systems.The probability of damage by low-trajectory tur bine missiles is large enough to warrant design precautions in future plants. The historical failure data on conventional units indicate that an incidence rate of 10' per turbine year is appropriate for material failures at speeds up to design overspeed (120% to 130% of turbine operating speed). There is reason to believe that improvements in turbine design, particularly in materials selection, will reduce the design overspeed failure rate. However, an operating history of the length required to permit es timates of very low failure rates, even in the absence of any failures, has not been accumulated. This, and the recurrence of disc or rotor degradation due to other causes, leads the staff to conclude that without additional evidence, use of the historical failure rateis appropriate. Assurance of low failure rates can be enhanced by an inservice inspection program. Tradeoffs between frequency and level of testing and improvements in reliability are currently under studyby the NRC staff.A more difficult protection problem is presentedby runaway turbine failures that may result in turbine speeds of 180% to 190% prior to destructive failure ofthe turbine wheels or shaft. Again, historical data indicate a destructive overspeed failure rate of about10" per turbine year. The staff's view is, however,that significant reduction in the rate of destructive overspeed failures may be obtained by the application of improved overspeed protection systems, redundant turbine steam valving, improved valve design, and frequent valve testing. The degree ofcredit for improved systems and procedures appearsto be limited primarily by the reliability of turbinesteam valving. Many of the destructive overspeed failures of recent years were caused by the failure ofturbine steam valves to close and stop the flow ofsteam even though a trip signal was generated. A definitive study of turbine valve failure modes is not available in the published literature, but the subje& is currently being investigated by the NRC staff.I~Figure 1 Low-Trajectory Turbine Missile Strike Zone1.115-2I IEvidence currently available' indicates that low trajectory turbine missile strikes will be concentrated within an area bounded by lines inclined at 25 degrees to the turbine wheel planes and passing through the end wheels of the low-pressure stages (see Figure 1). This applies to the low-pressure :stage shrunk-on wheels of the 1800-rpm turbines generally used with light-water-cooled reactors. Essential systems within this area and close to the turbine axis are most vulnerable; those further removed from the turbine axis are less likely to be hit by a missile. Systems out side this area are not endangered by high-energy low trajectory missiles.The staff has concluded that protecting essential systems by excluding them from the low-trajectory hazard zone has less associated uncertainty than other methods and thus is the preferred method of protection. However, plants with less favorable tur bine orientation have been found acceptable. The protection of an essential system within the low trajectory missile strike zone is considered adequate against low-trajectory turbine missiles if the system is either small enough or far enough removed from the turbine that the probability of its being struck by a turbine missile is less than 1NO-. If more than one es sential system is so located, the sum of the probabilities of their being struck should be less than "iO(. This criterion is a conservative way to ensure that the hazard rate due to low-trajectory turbine missiles is less than 10- per year, which the NRC staff considers an acceptable risk rate for the loss of an essential system from a single event. Combina tions of such measures as care in the placement of es sential systems, separation of redundant equipment, and special attention to turbine valve reliability have been shown, through -detailed strike and damage analyses, to have accomplished the objective of en suring a low risk of damage from turbine missiles.Some degree of protection against low-trajectory turbine missiles may be provided by barriers. There is no body of experimental evidence on the impact ef fects of large irregularly shaped missiles similar to those observed in turbine failures on either steel or reinforced concrete structures. Considerable uncer tainty attends the current practice of using damage predictions based on ordnance data, particularly in the choice of an "effective impact area." However, conservative damage predictions can be made by us ing results of similar tests and conservative assump tions. Some recent data3 were motivated by protec tion against tornado missiles. For cases in which the impact was normal and the impact area known, there was good correlation3 between actual penetration dis tances into reinforced concrete and those predicted2Ibid."3"Full-Scale Tornado-Missile Impact Tests," EPRI NP-148, Electric Power Research Institute, April 1976.by'the Modified National Defense Research Council (NDRC) formula.' Predictions of backface scabbing due to missile impact were not as good. For metal structures, application of the Ballistic Research Laboratory (BRL) formula5 should give conservative results for large missiles.If multiple barriers are counted on to protect essen tial systems, the protection is deemed adequate if the last barrier will stop the missile without generating secondary missiles that could damage any essential system. For calculating residual velocities after the missile has perforated a barrier, the following relationship is conservative:2 2 V2vr = (vi -vp)where vr = residual missile velocity after perforation,Vi= incident missile velocity, andVp = incident missile velocity required to justperforate the barrier, calculated by conservative use of penetration data.This guide addresses only large missiles that might be ejected in the event of a turbine failure. The in herent protection provided in most plants (generally 1 ½/ to 2 feet of reinforced concrete) ensures that minor missiles, which could be ejected in significant numbers and in widely scattered directions once the casing is breached, would not result in damage to es sential systems.Since turbine missile hazards may arise from non nuclear as well as other nuclear units on the site, con sideration should be given to the placement of pre sent and, to the extent possible, future units on the site. It should be recognized that the placement of currently proposed plants may affect the future place ment of additional units.C. REGULATORY POSITION1. Essential systems of a nuclear power plant should be protected against low-trajectory turbine missiles due to failure of main turbine-generator sets. Consideration may be limited to the structures, systems, and components listed in the Appendix to Regulatory Guide 1.117, "Tornado Design Clas-. sification." The effect of physical separation of redundant or alternative systems may also be con sidered. Each essential system and its location should be identified on dimensioned plan and elevation layout drawings."Kennedy, R. P., "A Review of Procedures for Analysis and Design of Concrete Structures to Resist Missile Impact Effects," Nuclear Engineering a nd Design, 1976. "5"Fundamentals of Protective Design," TM-5-855-1, Department of the Army, July 1965.1.115-32. Protection of essential systems or structures against direct strikes by low-trajectory turbine mis siles can be provided by appropriate placement and orientation of the turbine units. The protection of an essential system is acceptable if the system and any protecting structure are located outside the low trajectory missile strike zones, which are defined by :±25-degree lines emanating from the centers of the first and last low-pressure turbine wheels as measured from the plane of the wheels (see Figure 1). The strike zones associated with the turbines of all present and future nuclear and nonnuclear units at the site should be considered.3. When protection of essential systems is provided by barriers, dimensioned plan and elevation layout drawings should include information on wall or slab thicknesses and materials of pertinent struc tures. The protection is considered acceptable if no missile can compromise the final barrier protecting an essential system. Steel barriers should be thick enough to prevent perforation. Concrete barriers should be thick enough to prevent backface scab bing.4. The protection of essential systems located within the low-trajectory missile strike zone is accepUNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D. C. 20555OFFICIAL BUSINESSPENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300table if, in the event of a turbine failure, the probability of damage summed over all such systems Iis less than, 10.35. Turbine designs significantly different from current 1800-rpm machines will be reviewed on a caseby-case basis to determine the applicability of the'strike zone.D. IMPLEMENTATIONThe purpose of this section is to provide information to applicants regarding the NRC staff's plans forusing this regulatory guide.This guide reflects current NRC staff practice. Therefore, except in those cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the Commission's regulations, the method described herein is being and will continue to be used in the evaluation of submittals in connection with operating license or construction permit applications until this guide isrevised as a result of suggestions from the public or additional staff review.POSTAGE AND FEES PAIDU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY iCOMMISSIONI。
核电厂抗震设计阻尼值DAMPING VALUES FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS美国核管理委员会USNRC RG 1.61(2007年3月第一次修订版)环境保护部核与辐射安全中心二〇一二年九月美国核管理委员会2007年3月第一次修订版管理导则核监管研究办公室管理导则1.61(草案编号DG-1157,2006年10月出版)核电厂抗震设计阻尼值 1.61 (2007026)A.引言根据HAF102要求,本导则为核电厂Ⅰ类抗震结构、系统和部件(SSCs)地震反应分析中所使用、可接受的阻尼值提供指导。
特别地,HAD102/02 要求对安全重要的SSCs设计应抵御诸如地震等自然灾害的影响而不能失去其正常的安全性能。
这些SSCs也应设计成适应灾害影响并适应与正常环境条件有关的运行事件和假想事件。
我国核安全监管当局认为本导则规定的阻尼值符合有关地震反应分析的规范和导则的要求。
指定的阻尼值用于弹性模态地震反应分析,其中能量耗散用粘滞阻尼模拟(即,阻尼力与速度成比例)。
--------------------------------------------------------------------B.讨论背景阻尼是衡量动力荷载作用下材料或结构系统能量耗散的尺度,用于描述动力系统能量耗散的数学模型及求解过程的专业术语。
开展弹性系统地震反应分析时,可以通过在模型中指定粘滞性阻尼大小(即阻尼力与速度成正比)来考虑能量耗散。
核工业界和许可证持有者建议核安全局接受更合理的阻尼值以用于SSCs的抗震分析与设计。
结构阻尼1993年最初版本Rg1.61提供了结构适用的阻尼值,有关结果见文献NUREG/CR-6011[3],分析了有关数据以确定能显著影响结构阻尼的参数。
基于此项研究,最初版本Rg1.61阻尼值是合适的,但需要必要的修订。
特别是,对于钢结构,Rg1.61规范应区分摩擦型镙拴连接和承压型镙拴连接。
伴随人类社会不断的进步,人与自然,建筑与环境之间的关系密不可分.从当代人们所生活的环境中,我们可以看出环境艺术也在经历着自身的发展,而人们只有从尊重自然环境,尊重人类自身,才能够真正将环境艺术更好地融入建筑设计中去。
下面是环境设计英文参考文献的分享,供大家参考阅读。
环境设计英文参考文献一: [1]Jianlong Ma,Xiaofeng Lu,Honglin Zhai,Qiang Li,Li Qiao,Yong Guo. Rational design of a near-infrared fluorescence probe forhighly selective sensing butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and its bioimaging applications in living cell[J]. Talanta,2020,219. [2]Takada Sae,Ober Allison J,Currier Judith S,Goldstein NoahJ,Horwich Tamara B,Mittman Brian S,Shu Suzanne B,Tseng Chi-Hong,Vijayan Tara,Wali Soma,Cunningham William E,Ladapo Joseph A. Reducing cardiovascular risk among people living with HIV: Rationale and design of the INcreasing Statin Prescribing in HIV Behavioral Economics REsearch (INSPIRE) randomized controlled trial.[J]. Progress in cardiovascular diseases,2020,63(2). [3]Duvall Samuel W,Childers W Seth. Design of a Histidine Kinase FRET Sensor to Detect Complex Signal Integration within Living Bacteria.[J]. ACS sensors,2020. [4]Eisapour Mazhar,Cao Shi,Boger Jennifer. Participatory design and evaluation of virtual reality games to promote engagement in physical activity for people living with dementia.[J]. Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering,2020,7. [5]Laura Fiorini,Kasia Tabeau,Grazia D’Onofrio,LuigiCoviello,Marleen De Mul,Daniele Sancarlo,IsabelleFabbricotti,Filippo Cavallo. Co-creation of an assistive robot for independent living: lessons learned on robot design[J].International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM),2020,14(2). [6]. CarexTech Inc.; CarexTech's Smile Platform, Designed to Connect Families and Senior Living Communities, Sees Usage Spike Over 300 Percent in Wake of COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Medical Letter on the CDC & FDA,2020. [7]Mazhar Eisapour,Shi Cao,Jennifer Boger. Participatory design and evaluation of virtual reality games to promote engagement in physical activity for people living with dementia[J]. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering,2020,7. [8]OZ Architecture. OZ Architecture releases insight report on future of senior living design[J]. Building Design &Construction,2020. [9]Gang Zhao,Chunxue Yi,Gang Wei,Rongliang Wu,Zhengye Gu,Shanyi Guang,Hongyao Xu. Molecular design strategies of multifunctional probe for simultaneous monitoring of Cu 2+ , Al 3+ , Ca 2+ and endogenous l -phenylalanine (LPA) recognition in living cells and zebrafishes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2020,389. [10]. Veterinary Medicine; Data on Veterinary Medicine Detailed by Researchers at Hubei University of Education (Impact of Chimpanzee Living Habits On the Design of Zoo Ecological Environment Transformation)[J]. Ecology, Environment & Conservation,2020. [11]Weichao Cai,Xianhui Wang. Design of Health Care for Elderly Living Alone Based on ZigBee[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2020,1550(4). [12]Pandya. Older Adults Who Meditate Regularly Perform Better on Neuropsychological Functioning and Visual Working Memory Tests: A Three-month Waitlist Control Design Study with a Cohort of Seniorsin Assisted Living Facilities[J]. Experimental AgingResearch,2020,46(3). [13]Pandya Samta P. Older Adults Who Meditate Regularly Perform Better on Neuropsychological Functioning and Visual Working Memory Tests: A Three-month Waitlist Control Design Study with a Cohort of Seniors in Assisted Living Facilities.[J]. Experimental aging research,2020,46(3). [14]Bogza Laura-Mihaela,Patry-Lebeau Cassandra,FarmanovaElina,Witteman Holly O,Elliott Jacobi,Stolee Paul,HudonCarol,Giguere Anik Mc. User-Centered Design and Evaluation of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Older Adults Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Health Care Providers: A Mixed MethodsStudy.[J]. Journal of medical Internet research,2020. [15]Zhao Gang,Yi Chunxue,Wei Gang,Wu Rongliang,Gu Zhengye,Guang Shanyi,Xu Hongyao. Molecular design strategies of multifunctional probe for simultaneous monitoring of Cu<sup>2+</sup>,Al<sup>3+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup> and endogenous l-phenylalanine (LPA) recognition in living cells and zebrafishes.[J]. Journal of hazardous materials,2020,389. [16]Laurie Gries,Blake Watson,Jason P. Kalin,Jaqui Pratt,Desiree Dighton. (Re)designing Innovation Alley: fostering civic living and learning through visual rhetoric and urban design[J]. Review of Communication,2020,20(2). [17]Donna Boss. Refreshing Drab Design at a Senior LivingFacility[J]. Foodservice Equipment & Supplies,2020,73(4). [18]Ding Haiyuan,Peng Longpeng,Yuan Gangqiang,Zhou Liyi. Design, synthesis and bioimaging application of a novel two-photon xanthene fluorescence probe for ratiometric visualization of endogenous peroxynitrite in living cells and zebrafish[J]. Dyes andPigments,2020,176. [19]Sae Takada,Allison J. Ober,Judith S. Currier,Noah J. Goldstein,Tamara B. Horwich,Brian S. Mittman,Suzanne B. Shu,Chi-Hong Tseng,Tara Vijayan,Soma Wali,William E. Cunningham,Joseph A. Ladapo. Reducing cardiovascular risk among people living with HIV: Rationale and design of the INcreasing Statin Prescribing in HIV Behavioral Economics REsearch (INSPIRE) randomized controlled trial[J]. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases,2020,63(2). [20]Ray Sarkar Arpita,Sanyal Goutam,Majumder Somajyoti. Participatory design for selection of icons to represent daily activities of living for a vision-based rehabilitation-cum-assistance system for locked-in patients.[J]. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology,2020,15(3). [21]Arpita Ray Sarkar,Goutam Sanyal,Somajyoti Majumder. Participatory design for selection of icons to represent daily activities of living for a vision-based rehabilitation-cum-assistance system for locked-in patients[J]. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology,2020,15(3). [22]Haiyuan Ding,Longpeng Peng,Gangqiang Yuan,Liyi Zhou. Design, synthesis and bioimaging application of a novel two-photon xanthene fluorescence probe for ratiometric visualization of endogenous peroxynitrite in living cells and zebrafish[J]. Dyes andPigments,2020,176. [23]Amal Said Taha,Rawia Ali Ibrahim. Effect of a Design Discharge Planning Program for Stroke Patients on Their Quality of Life and Activity of Daily Living[J]. International Journal of Studies in Nursing,2020,5(1). [24]Melania Reggente,Sara Politi,Alessandra Antonucci,Emanuela Tamburri,Ardemis A. Boghossian. Design of Optimized PEDOT‐Based Electrodes for Enhancing Performance of Living Photovoltaics Based on Phototropic Bacteria[J]. Advanced MaterialsTechnologies,2020,5(3). [25]Kjersti Benedicte Blom,Kaja Knudsen Bergo,Emil Knut Stenersen Espe,Vigdis Rosseland,Ole J?rgen Gr?tta,Geir Mj?en,Anders?sberg,Stein Bergan,Helga Sanner,Tone Kristin Bergersen,ReidarBj?rnerheim,Morten Skauby,Ingebj?rg Seljeflot,B?rd Waldum-Grevbo,Dag Olav Dahle,Ivar Sjaastad,Jon Arne Birkeland. Cardiovascular rEmodelling in living kidNey donorS with reduced glomerularfiltration rate: rationale and design of the CENS study[J]. Blood Pressure,2020,29(2). [26]. Sustainability Research; Researchers at University of Oradea Have Reported New Data on Sustainability Research (Design and Operation of Constructions: A Healthy Living Environment-Parametric Studies and New Solutions)[J]. Energy & Ecology,2020. [27]Carly Elizabeth Guss,Elizabeth R. Woods,Ellen R.Cooper,Sandra Burchett,Julia Fuller,Olivia Dumont,Y.X. Ho,MerynRobinson,Dallas Swendeman,Jessica Haberer,Shelagh Mulvaney,Vikram Kumar. 252. Pluscare: A Mobile Platform Designed to Increase Linkage to Care for Youth Living with HIV/AIDS[J]. Journal of Adolescent Health,2020,66(2). [28]Rachel Soo Hoo Smith,Christoph Bader,Sunanda Sharma,Dominik Kolb,Tzu‐Chieh Tang,Ahmed Hosny,Felix Moser,James C.Weaver,Christopher A. Voigt,Neri Oxman. Hybrid Living Materials: Digital Design and Fabrication of 3D Multimaterial Structures with Programmable Biohybrid Surfaces[J]. Advanced FunctionalMaterials,2020,30(7). [29]Epps Fayron,Choe Jenny,Alexander Karah,Brewster Glenna. Designing Worship Services to Support African-American PersonsLiving with Dementia.[J]. Journal of religion and health,2020. [30]. Biotechnology - Biohybrids; Recent Research from Massachusetts Institute of Technology Highlight Findings in Biohybrids (Hybrid Living Materials: Digital Design and Fabrication of 3d Multimaterial Structures With Programmable BiohybridSurfaces)[J]. Biotech Week,2020. [31]Thangavelu Karthick,Hayward Joshua A,Pachana Nancy A,Byrne Gerard J,Mitchell Leander K,Wallis Guy M,Au Tiffany R,Dissanayaka Nadeeka N. Designing Virtual Reality Assisted Psychotherapy for Anxiety in Older Adults Living with Parkinson's Disease: Integrating Literature for Scoping.[J]. Clinical gerontologist,2020. [32]Cun Li. The Design of a System to Support Storytelling Between Older Adults Living in a Nursing Home and Their Children[J]. The Design Journal,2020,23(1). [33]. Living in town and the invention of “culture”: development images designed from the countryside[J]. Etnográfica,2019,23(2). [34]Marleen Prins MSc,Bernadette M. Willemse PhD,Ceciel H. Heijkants MSc,Anne Margriet Pot PhD. Nursing home care for people with dementia: Update of the design of the Living Arrangements for people with Dementia (LAD)‐study[J]. Journal of AdvancedNursing,2019,75(12). [35]Laura E. Simons,Lauren E. Harrison,Shannon F. O'Brien,Marissa S. Heirich,Nele Loecher,Derek B. Boothroyd,Johan W.S. Vlaeyen,Rikard K. Wicksell,Deborah Schofield,Korey K. Hood,MichaelOrendurff,Salinda Chan,Sam Lyons. Graded exposure treatment for adolescents with chronic pain (GET Living): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial enhanced with single case experimental design[J]. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications,2019,16. [36]Akira Hirao,Yuri Matsuo,Raita Goseki. Synthesis of novel block polymers with unusual block sequences by methodology combining living anionic polymerization and designed linking chemistry[J]. Journal of Polymer Research,2019,26(12). 环境设计英文参考文献二: [37]Soyeon Kim,Seyun An,Hannah Ju. Study on Citizens’ Awareness of Smart City Living Lab based on User Participatory design[J]. ? ICCC ?,2019. [38]Prins Marleen,Willemse Bernadette M,Heijkants Ceciel H,Pot Anne Margriet. Nursing home care for people with dementia: Update of the design of the Living Arrangements for people with Dementia (LAD)-study.[J]. Journal of advanced nursing,2019,75(12). [39]. Nanotechnology - Nanomaterials; Data on Nanomaterials Reported by Researchers at CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience (Programmable Construction of Peptide-based Materials In Living Subjects: From Modular Design and Morphological Control To Theranostics)[J]. Biotech Week,2019. [40]Diao Quanping,Guo Hua,Yang Zhiwei,Luo Weiwei,Li Tiechun,Hou Dongyan. Design of a Nile red-based NIR fluorescent probe for the detection of hydrogen peroxide in living cells.[J]. Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy,2019,223. [41]Quanping Diao,Hua Guo,Zhiwei Yang,Weiwei Luo,TiechunLi,Dongyan Hou. Design of a Nile red-based NIR fluorescent probe for the detection of hydrogen peroxide in living cells[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy,2019,223. [42]Simons Laura E,Harrison Lauren E,O'Brien Shannon F,Heirich Marissa S,Loecher Nele,Boothroyd Derek B,Vlaeyen Johan W S,Wicksell Rikard K,Schofield Deborah,Hood Korey K,Orendurff Michael,Chan Salinda,Lyons Sam. Graded exposure treatment for adolescents with chronic pain (GET Living): Protocol for a randomized controlledtrial enhanced with single case experimental design.[J]. Contemporary clinical trials communications,2019,16. [43]Wenda Zhang,Yu Wang,Junqiang Dong,Yonggao Zhang,JiawenZhu,Jianbo Gao. Rational design of stable near-infrared cyanine-based probe with remarkable large Stokes Shift for monitoring Carbon monoxide in living cells and in vivo[J]. Dyes and Pigments,2019,171. [44]Bodo D. Wilts,Silvia Vignolini. Living light : optics, ecology and design principles of natural photonic structures[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface Focus,2019,9(1). [45]Aprameya Ganesh Prasad,Dominick Salerno,Alaina K. Howe,Omkar Mandar Bhatavdekar,Stavroula Sofou. Location-Location-Location: Designing Cationic Charge Placement on Lipid Vesicles Determines their Interactions with Living Cells[J]. BiophysicalJournal,2019,116(3). [46]Zhang Gaobin,Ni Yun,Zhang Duoteng,Li Hao,Wang Nanxiang,Yu Changmin,Li Lin,Huang Wei. Rational design of NIR fluorescenceprobes for sensitive detection of viscosity in living cells.[J]. Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy,2019,214. [47]Chi Chia-Fen,Dewi Ratna Sari,Samali Priska,Hsieh Dong-Yu. Preference ranking test for different icon design formats for smart living room and bathroom functions.[J]. Applied ergonomics,2019,81. [48]Seth Christopher Yaw Appiah,Adeyemi Olu Adekunle,Adesina Oladokun,Jonathan Mensah Dapaah,Karikari Mensah Nicholas. Designing a Need Based Social Protection Intervention Package for Children and Adolescents Living with HIV and AIDS in Ghana—An Eclectic Perspective on Desired Social Protection InterventionPackage/Framework[J]. Health,2019,11(10). [49]Ioulia V. Ossokina,Theo A. Arentze,Dick van Gameren,Dirk van den Heuvel. Best living concepts for elderly homeowners: combining a stated choice experiment with architectural design[J]. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,2019(prepublish). [50]Blom Kjersti Benedicte,Bergo Kaja Knudsen,Espe Emil Knut Stenersen,Rosseland Vigdis,Gr?tta Ole J?rgen,Mj?en Geir,?sberg Anders,Bergan Stein,Sanner Helga,Bergersen Tone Kristin,Bj?rnerheim Reidar,Skauby Morten,Seljeflot Ingebj?rg,Waldum-Grevbo B?rd,Dahle Dag Olav,Sjaastad Ivar,Birkeland Jon Arne. Cardiovascular rEmodelling in living kidNey donorS with reduced glomerularfiltration rate: rationale and design of the CENS study.[J]. Blood pressure,2019. [51]Li Li-Li,Qiao Zeng-Ying,Wang Lei,Wang Hao. Programmable Construction of Peptide-Based Materials in Living Subjects: From Modular Design and Morphological Control to Theranostics.[J]. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.),2019,31(45). [52]Li‐Li Li,Zeng‐Ying Qiao,Lei Wang,Hao Wang. Programmable Construction of Peptide‐Based Materials in Living Subjects: From Modular Design and Morphological Control to Theranostics[J]. Advanced Materials,2019,31(45). [53]Li‐Li Li,Zeng‐Ying Qiao,Lei Wang,Hao Wang. Self‐Assembly: Programmable Construction of Peptide‐Based Materials in Living Subjects: From Modular Design and Morphological Control to Theranostics (Adv. Mater. 45/2019)[J]. AdvancedMaterials,2019,31(45). [54]Chia-Fen Chi,Ratna Sari Dewi,Priska Samali,Dong-Yu Hsieh. Preference ranking test for different icon design formats for smart living room and bathroom functions[J]. Applied Ergonomics,2019,81. [55]Liu Sam,Marques Isabela Gouveia,Perdew Megan A,Strange Karen,Hartrick Teresa,Weismiller Joy,Ball Geoff D C,M?sse LouiseC,Rhodes Ryan,Naylor Patti-Jean. Family-based, healthy living intervention for children with overweight and obesity and theirfamilies: a 'real world' trial protocol using a randomised wait list control design.[J]. BMJ open,2019,9(10). [56]Sam Liu,Isabela Gouveia Marques,Megan A Perdew,Karen Strange,Teresa Hartrick,Joy Weismiller,Geoff D C Ball,Louise CM?sse,Ryan Rhodes,Patti-Jean Naylor. Family-based, healthy living intervention for children with overweight and obesity and their families: a ‘real world’ trial protocol using a randomised wait list control design[J]. BMJ Open,2019,9(10). [57]Shu-Yen Wang,Shyh-Huei Hwang. Research on Field Reconstruction and Community Design of Living Settlements—An Example of Repairing a Fish Stove in the Hua-Zhai Settlement on Wang-An Island, Taiwan[J]. Sustainability,2019,11(21). [58]Diana Sherifali,Anka Brozic,Pieter Agema,Hertzel C. Gerstein,Zubin Punthakee,Natalia McInnes,Daria O'Reilly,Sarah Ibrahim,R. Muhammad Usman Ali. The Diabetes Health Coaching Randomized Controlled Trial: Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of Adults Living With Type 2 Diabetes[J]. Canadian Journal of Diabetes,2019,43(7). [59]Sherifali Diana,Brozic Anka,Agema Pieter,Gerstein HertzelC,Punthakee Zubin,McInnes Natalia,O'Reilly Daria,Ibrahim Sarah,Usman Ali R Muhammad. The Diabetes Health Coaching Randomized Controlled Trial: Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of Adults Living With Type 2 Diabetes.[J]. Canadian journal ofdiabetes,2019,43(7). [60]Paula Barros,Linda Ng Fat,Leandro M.T. Garcia,Anne Dorothée Slovic,Nikolas Thomopoulos,Thiago Herick de Sá,Pedro Morais,Jennifer S. Mindell. Social consequences and mental health outcomes of living in high-rise residential buildings and the influence of planning, urban design and architectural decisions: A systematic review[J]. Cities,2019,93. [61]Jane Rohde. Book Review: Housing design for an increasingly older population: Redefining assisted living for the mentally and physically frail[J]. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal,2019,12(4). [62]Kyazze Michael,Wesson Janet,Naudé Kevin. A conceptual framework for designing Ambient assisted living services for individuals with disabilities in Uganda and South Africa.[J].African journal of disability,2019,8. [63]. University of Tokyo; Inspired by natural signals in living cells, researchers design artificial gas detector[J]. NewsRx Health & Science,2019. [64]Rania Magdi Fawzy. Neoliberalism in your living room: A spatial cognitive reading of home design in IKEA catalogue[J]. Discourse, Context & Media,2019,31. [65] Living light: optics, ecology and design principles of natural photonic structures[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface Focus,2019,9(1). [66]F. G. García González,G. Agugiaro,R. Cavallo. AN INTERACTIVE DESIGN TOOL FOR URBAN PLANNING USING THE SIZE OF THE LIVING SPACE AS UNIT OF MEASUREMENT[J]. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial InformationSciences,2019,XLII-4/W15. [67]. Energy; Researchers from University of Sannio ReportDetails of New Studies and Findings in the Area of Energy (Numerical Optimization for the Design of Living Walls In the Mediterranean Climate)[J]. Energy Weekly News,2019. [68]. Astronomy; Investigators from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Zero in on Astronomy (Optical Design of the Extreme Coronagraph for Living Planetary Systems Instrument for the Luvoir Mission Study)[J]. Science Letter,2019. [69]Roterman Irena,Konieczny Leszek. The living organism: evolutionary design or an accident[J]. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems,2019,15(3). [70]Hailiang Nie,Yanhong Liang,Chuang Han,Rubo Zhang,Xiaoling Zhang,Hongyuan Yan. Rational design of cyanovinyl-pyrene dual-emission AIEgens for potential application in dual-channel imaging and ratiometric sensing in living cells[J]. Dyes andPigments,2019,168. [71]Anonymous. Faulkner Design Group Earns Silver Aurora Awards for Excellence in Multifamily and Senior Living and Communities[J]. Design Cost Data,2019,63(5). [72]Rosa Francesca De Masi,Filippo de Rossi,SilviaRuggiero,Giuseppe Peter Vanoli. Numerical optimization for the design of living walls in the Mediterranean climate[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2019,195. 环境设计英文参考文献三: [73]Michael Kyazze,Janet Wesson,Kevin Naudé. A conceptual framework for designing Ambient assisted living services for individuals with disabilities in Uganda and South Africa[J]. African Journal of Disability,2019,8. [74]Ma Yanyan,Tang Yonghe,Zhao Yuping,Lin Weiying. Rational Design of a Reversible Fluorescent Probe for Sensing SulfurDioxide/Formaldehyde in Living Cells, Zebrafish, and LivingMice.[J]. Analytical chemistry,2019,91(16). [75]Liu Guang-Jian,Zhang Yuan,Zhou Lingyun,Jia Li-Yan,Jiang Guohua,Xing Guo-Wen,Wang Shu. A water-soluble AIE-active polyvalentglycocluster: design, synthesis and studies on carbohydrate-lectin interactions for visualization of Siglec distributions in livingcell membranes.[J]. Chemical communications (Cambridge,England),2019,55(66). [76]Jaffar Ali,Javed Iqbal,Shabbir Majeed,Imran AhmedMughal,Awais Ahmad,Salman Ahmed. Wireless sensor network design for smart grids and Internet of things for ambient living using cross-layer techniques[J]. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks,2019,15(7). [77]Rosmina A. Bustami,Chris Brien,James Ward,Simon Beecham,Robyn Rawlings. A Statistically Rigorous Approach to Experimental Designof Vertical Living Walls for Green Buildings[J]. UrbanScience,2019,3(3). [78]Teksin Kopanoglu,Katie Beverley,Dominic Eggbeer,Andrew Walters. Uncovering self-management needs to better design for people living with lymphoedema[J]. Design for Health,2019,3(2). [79]Kerri Akiwowo,Lucy Dennis,George Weaver,Guy Bingham. The Living Archive: Facilitating Textile Design Research at Undergraduate Level Through Collaboration, Co-Creation and Student Engagement[J]. Journal of Textile Design Research andPractice,2019,7(2). [80]Vanessa Bartlett. Digital design and time on device; how aesthetic experience can help to illuminate the psychological impact of living in a digital culture[J]. Digital Creativity,2019,30(3). [81]Maree McCabe,Stuart Favilla,Sonja Pedell,Jeanie Beh,Andrew Murphy,Tanya Petrovich. O2‐01‐05: DESIGNING A BETTER VISIT: TOUCH SCREEN APPS FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH DEMENTIA AND THEIR VISITORS[J]. Alzheimer's & Dementia,2019,15. [82]Maree McCabe,Stuart Favilla,Sonja Pedell,Jeanie Beh,Andrew Murphy,Tanya Petrovich. TD‐P‐33: DESIGNING A BETTER VISIT: TOUCH SCREEN APP FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH DEMENTIA AND THEIR VISITORS[J]. Alzheimer's & Dementia,2019,15. [83]Ning Zhang-Wei,Wu Song-Ze,Liu Guang-Jian,Ji Yan-Ming,Jia Li-Yan,Niu Xiao-Xiao,Ma Rong-Fang,Zhang Yuan,Xing Guo-Wen. Water-soluble AIE-Active Fluorescent Organic Nanoparticles: Design, Preparation and Application for Specific Detection of Cysteine over Homocysteine and Glutathione in Living Cells.[J]. Chemistry, an Asian journal,2019,14(13). [84]Zhang‐wei Ning,Song‐ze Wu,Dr. Guang‐jian Liu,Yan‐ming Ji,Li‐yan Jia,Xiao‐xiao Niu,Rong‐fang Ma,Dr. Yuan Zhang,Prof. Guo‐wen Xing. Water‐soluble AIE‐Active Fluorescent Organic Nanoparticles: Design, Preparation and Application for Specific Detection of Cysteine over Homocysteine and Glutathione in Living Cells[J]. Chemistry – An Asian Journal,2019,14(13). [85]Turgeon Philippe,Laliberte Thierry,Routhier Francois,Campeau-Lecours Alexandre. Preliminary Design of an Active Stabilization Assistive Eating Device for People Living with MovementDisorders.[J]. IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings],2019,2019. [86]Switzer Sarah,Chan Carusone Soo,Guta Adrian,Strike Carol. A Seat at the Table: Designing an Activity-Based Community Advisory Committee With People Living With HIV Who Use Drugs.[J]. Qualitative health research,2019,29(7). [87]Kui Du,Jian Liu,Runpu Shen,Pengfei Zhang. Design andsynthesis of a new fluorescent probe for cascade detection of Zn2+ and H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>? in water and targeted imaging of living cells[J]. Luminescence,2019,34(4). [88]Du Kui,Liu Jian,Shen Runpu,Zhang Pengfei. Design andsynthesis of a new fluorescent probe for cascade detection of Zn2+ and H<sub>2</sub> PO<sub>4</sub> - in water and targeted imaging of living cells.[J]. Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence,2019,34(4). [89]Sarah Switzer,Soo Chan Carusone,Adrian Guta,Carol Strike. A Seat at the Table: Designing an Activity-Based Community Advisory Committee With People Living With HIV Who Use Drugs[J]. Qualitative Health Research,2019,29(7). [90]Zhang Jiahang,Shi Liang,Li Zhao,Li Dongyu,Tian Xinwei,Zhang Chengxiao. Near-infrared fluorescence probe for hydrogen peroxide detection: design, synthesis, and application in living systems.[J]. The Analyst,2019,144(11). [91]Peterson Erin L,Carlson Susan A,Schmid Thomas L,Brown David R,Galuska Deborah A. Supporting Active Living Through Community Plans: The Association of Planning Documents With Design Standards and Features.[J]. American journal of health promotion :AJHP,2019,33(2). [92]Mohamed El Amrousi,Feda Isam AbdulHafiz. Assessment of Modern Architecture in the Living City of UAE: Incorporating Sustainable Design into Covered Bazaar Buildings[J]. MATEC Web ofConferences,2019,266. [93]Tian Zhenhao,Ding Lele,Li Kun,Song Yunqing,Dou Tongyi,Hou Jie,Tian Xiangge,Feng Lei,Ge Guangbo,Cui Jingnan. Rational Design of a Long-Wavelength Fluorescent Probe for Highly Selective Sensing of Carboxylesterase 1 in Living Systems.[J]. Analyticalchemistry,2019,91(9). [94]. Wellness and glass: Designing better spaces to promote better living[J]. Building Design & Construction,2019. [95]Molly Mitchell,Donna Marie Bilkovic. Embracing dynamic design for climate‐resilient living shorelines[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2019,56(5). [96]Erguera Xavier A,Johnson Mallory O,Neilands Torsten B,Ruel Theodore,Berrean Beth,Thomas Sean,Saberi Parya. WYZ: a pilot study protocol for designing and developing a mobile health applicationfor engagement in HIV care and medication adherence in youth and young adults living with HIV.[J]. BMJ open,2019,9(5). [97]Gaobin Zhang,Yun Ni,Duoteng Zhang,Hao Li,NanxiangWang,Changmin Yu,Lin Li,Wei Huang. Rational design of NIR fluorescence probes for sensitive detection of viscosity in living cells[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy,2019,214. [98]Xavier A. Erguera,Mallory O. Johnson,Torsten B.Neilands,Theodore Ruel,Beth Berrean,Sean Thomas,Parya Saberi. WYZ: a pilot study protocol for designing and developing a mobile health application for engagement in HIV care and medication adherence in youth and young adults living with HIV[J]. BMJ Open,2019,9(5). [99]John F. Barber. Designed for HI-FI Living: The Vinyl LP in Midcentury America ed. by Janet Borgerson and Jonathan Schroeder (review)[J]. Leonardo,2019,52(2). [100]Udeshika Weerakkody,John W. Dover,Paul Mitchell,Kevin Reiling. Topographical structures in planting design of living walls affect their ability to immobilise traffic-based particulatematter[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,660. [101]JohnF. Barber. Designed for Hi-Fi Living: The Vinyl LP in MidcenturyAmerica[J]. Leonardo,2019,52(2). [102]. Luminescence Research; Study Data from Shaoxing University Provide New Insights into Luminescence Research (Design andsynthesis of a new fluorescent probe for cascade detection of Zn2+ and H2 PO4 - in water and targeted imaging of living cells)[J]. Science Letter,2019. [103]Euan Winton,Paul Anthony Rodgers. Designed with Me. Empowering People Living with Dementia[J]. The DesignJournal,2019,22(sup1). [104]Steve Reay,Claire Craig,Nicola Kayes. Unpacking two design for health living lab approaches for more effectiveinterdisciplinary collaboration[J]. The DesignJournal,2019,22(sup1). [105]Louise Mullagh,Stuart Walker,Martyn Evans. Living Design. The future of sustainable maker enterprises: a case study inCumbria[J]. The Design Journal,2019,22(sup1). [106]Zubair Khalid,Usman Khalid,Mohd Adib Sarijari,Hashim Safdar,Rahat Ullah,Mohsin Qureshi,Shafiq Ur Rehman. Sensor virtualization Middleware design for Ambient Assisted Living based on the Priority packet processing[J]. Procedia ComputerScience,2019,151. [107]A.EL ALAMI,Y. GHAZAOUI,S. DAS,S.D. BENNANI,M.EL GHZAOUI. Design and Simulation of RFID Array Antenna 2x1 for Detection System of Objects or Living Things in Motion[J]. Procedia Computer Science,2019,151. [108]Tao Jia,Zhi-Hang Chen,Peng Guo,Junping Yu. An insight into DNA binding properties of newly designed cationicδ,δ′?diazacarbazoles: Spectroscopy, AFM imaging and living cells staining studies[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy,2019,211. 以上就是环境设计英文参考文献的全部内容,希望看后对你有一点点帮助。
某新型核电站核岛建造过程的金属材料代换实践与分析张金东;吴崇志;郭倩;王宗奎【摘要】某新型核电站的核岛部分按某国外标准设计,其设备、部件和结构等使用的材料均符合ASTM、ASME等国外标准、规范.在该类型核电站依托项目的工程建设过程中,从降低建造成本和缩短采购周期等方面考虑,部分金属材料需要在国内进行采购,从而产生了诸多材料代换问题,例如由国标材料代换美标材料、美标材料代换美标材料等.概述了这些材料代换问题,对材料代换的起因和目的,材料代换应该遵循的原则,包括性能相当、标准规范许可、以及附加的设计协调措施等进行了详细描述,并对材料代换进行了分类和典型案例分析.根据所述方法和要素为基础,可形成核电工程建设过程中的材料代换标准化流程,为同类技术引进或出口项目过程中的材料代换提供借鉴.【期刊名称】《电焊机》【年(卷),期】2018(048)011【总页数】4页(P68-70,102)【关键词】核岛;金属材料;代换;分析【作者】张金东;吴崇志;郭倩;王宗奎【作者单位】国核工程有限公司,上海200233;国核工程有限公司,上海200233;国核工程有限公司,上海200233;国核工程有限公司,上海200233【正文语种】中文【中图分类】TL481 概述某新型核电站是我国引进的核电项目,核岛部分由某国外公司设计,设计体系基于该国的核安全法规、标准和规范,核岛的设备、部件和结构等使用材料均符合ASTM标准、ASME规范等标准和规范[1]。
在该类型核电站依托项目的工程建设过程中,由于设计文件交付延误、现场施工进度滞后等因素影响,从降低建造成本和缩短采购周期等方面考虑,部分金属材料需要在国内进行采购,从而产生了诸多材料代换问题。
在这些材料代换中,有些是主动代换,如对使用量大的钢筋进行国标材料代换;有些是被动代换,如对采购周期短、用量少的材料进行代换等。
在此分析研究材料代换原则及分类典型案例,为同类技术引进或出口项目过程中的材料代换提供借鉴。
August 2001DaimlerChryslerRoad vehiclesEMC requirements and tests of E/E systemsPart 2: Component test proceduresMBN 10 284-2Supersedes edition:Continued on pages 2 to 44Issued by :DaimlerChrysler AG D-70546 StuttgartNormung (EP/QDN)Technical responsibility (Name): GurtnerDepartment: EP/QDN Plant:019Telephone : (+49) 711 17- 2 08 39HPC:D652Sequence number 22 902/2Confidential! All rights reserved. Distribution and copes without written agreement by Daimler-Benz AG prohibited.Contractors may only receive standards through the responsible purchasing department.Contents 1General......................................................................................................................................................21.1Purpose.....................................................................................................................................................21.2Scope.........................................................................................................................................................21.3Normative references ..............................................................................................................................21.4Definitions.................................................................................................................................................41.5Test conditions.........................................................................................................................................41.6Test plan ...................................................................................................................................................41.7Test report and statement.......................................................................................................................41.8Test voltages............................................................................................................................................42Measuring and test equipment...............................................................................................................52.1Shielded enclosure..................................................................................................................................52.2Absorber-lined chamber..........................................................................................................................52.3Ground plane............................................................................................................................................52.4Stripline.....................................................................................................................................................52.5TEM cell.....................................................................................................................................................62.6Coupling clamp........................................................................................................................................62.7Current clamp...........................................................................................................................................62.8Artificial networks...................................................................................................................................72.8.1Transient disturbance emission.............................................................................................................72.8.2RF disturbance emission ........................................................................................................................72.9Electronic power switch..........................................................................................................................82.10ESD simulator...........................................................................................................................................82.11Coupling planes.......................................................................................................................................82.12Insulating bases.......................................................................................................................................83Emitted disturbances...............................................................................................................................93.1Conducted emissions..............................................................................................................................93.1.1Transient emissions conducted along supply lines.............................................................................93.1.2Radio disturbances conducted along supply lines............................................................................113.1.3Radio disturbance currents conducted along control/signal lines...................................................133.2Emission.................................................................................................................................................144.Immunity.................................................................................................................................................174.1Conducted disturbances......................................................................................................................174.2Radiation.................................................................................................................................................324.2.1Antenna radiation...................................................................................................................................324.2.2TEM cell...................................................................................................................................................344.2.3BCI method.............................................................................................................................................364.2.4Stripline...................................................................................................................................................384.3ESD (40)Date of translation 2002-03Page 2MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-081General1.1PurposeThe purpose of this Standard is to ensure electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) within the vehicle. In order to achieve this purpose, tests of the components alone (so-called "component tests") are described and the permissible emitted disturbances and immunity requirements defined. Deviations from the requirements contained in this Standard are only allowed if agreed explicitly in the specifications book between the supplier and the Mercedes-Benz vehicle line within DaimlerChrysler AG.The requirements are not deemed fulfilled until both the component test and the vehicle test have been passed. The purpose of component testing is a pre-qualification of components already at a time when no vehicles are yet available. Vehicle testing is authoritative for EMC approval.The Supplier shall comply with this Standard and ensure that its latest edition is used at all times.1.2ScopeThis Standard applies to all electrical and electronic components and subassemblies mounted in Mercedes-Benz vehicles.1.3Normative referencesThe EMC requirements and tests specified in this Standard are based, on principle, on the following national and international standards and statutory regulations listed below.DIN 40839-1:1992-10Elektromagnetische Verträglichkeit (EMV) in Straßenfahrzeugen.Leitungsgeführte impulsförmige Störgrößen auf Versorgungsleitungen in12-V-und 24-V-Bordnetzen.ISO 7637-3:1995-07Road vehicles, Electrical disturbance by conduction and coupling Part 3- Vehicles with nominal 12 V or 24 V supply voltage - Electrical transienttransmission by capacitive and inductive coupling via lines other thansupply lines.DIN ISO 7637-3:1999-02Straßenfahrzeuge, Elektrische Störungen durch Leitung und Kopplung,Teil 3: Fahrzeuge mit 12-V- oder 24-V-Bordnetz-Nennspannung,Übertragung von impulsförmigen elektrischen Störgrößen durchkapazitive und induktive Kopplung auf Leitungen, die keineVersorgungsleitungen sind (German translation of ISO 7637-3:1995).ISO 11452-1:1995-12Road vehicles, Electrical disturbances by narrowband radiatedelectromagnetic energy - Component test methods Part 1 - General anddefinitions.DIN ISO 11452-1:2000-03Straßenfahrzeuge, Elektrische Störung durch schmalbandige gestrahlteelektromagnetische Energie, Prüfverfahren für Komponenten, Teil 1:Allgemeines und Definitionen (German translation of ISO 11452-1:1995).ISO 11542-2:1995-12Road vehicles, Electrical disturbances by narrowband radiatedelectromagnetic energy - Component test methods Part 2 - Absorber-lined chamber.DIN ISO 11452-2:2000-03Straßenfahrzeuge, Elektrische Störungen durch schmalbandigegestrahlte elektromagnetische Energie, Prüfverfahren für Komponenten,Teil 2: Absorberraum (German translation of ISO 11452-2: 1995).ISO 11542-3:1995-12Road vehicles, Electrical disturbances by narrowband radiatedelectromagnetic energy - Component test methods Part 3 - Transverseelectromagnetic mode (TEM) cell.Page 3MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-08 DIN ISO 11452-3:2000-03Straßenfahrzeuge, Elektrische Störungen durch schmalbandigegestrahlte elektromagnetische Energie, Prüfverfahren für Komponenten,Teil 3: Transversal-Elektro-Magnetische (TEM)- Wellenleiter (Germantranslation of ISO 11452-3: 1995).ISO 11452-4:1995-12Road vehicles, Electrical disturbances by narrowband radiatedelectromagnetic energy - Component test methods Part 4 - Bulk currentinjection (BCI).DIN ISO 11452-4:2000-03Straßenfahrzeuge, Elektrische Störungen durch schmalbandigegestrahlte elektromagnetische Energie, Prüfverfahren für Komponenten,Teil 4: Stromeinspeisung (BCI) (German translation of ISO 11452-4:1995).ISO 11452-5:1995-12Road vehicles, Electrical disturbances by narrowband radiatedelectromagnetic energy - Component test methods Part 5 - Stripline.DIN ISO 11452-5:2000-03Straßenfahrzeuge, Elektrische Störungen durch schmalbandigegestrahlte elektromagnetische Energie, Prüfverfahren für Komponenten,Teil 5: Streifenleitung (German translation of ISO 11452-5: 1995).DIN VDE 0876-16-11):1998-05Anforderungen an Geräte und Einrichtungen sowie Festlegung derVerfahren zur Messung der hochfrequenten Störaussendung(Funkstörungen) und Störfestigkeit. Teil 1: Geräte und Einrichtungen zurMessung der hochfrequenten Störaussendung (Funkstörungen) undStörfestigkeit (German translation of CISPR 16-1: 1993).DIN VDE 0879-2:1999-03Grenzwerte und Messverfahren für Funkstörungen zum Schutz vonEmpfängern in Fahrzeugen (German translation of CISPR 25: 1995).ISO 106052):2000-08Road vehicles - Electrical disturbances from electrostatic discharges.ISO 16750-13):Road vehicles - Environmental conditions and testing for electrical andelectronic equipment Part 1 - General.ISO 16750-23):Road vehicles - Environmental conditions and testing for electrical andelectronic equipment Part 2 - Electrical loads.DIN EN 61000-4-2:1996-03Elektromagnetische Verträglichkeit (EMV), Teil 4: Prüf- undMessverfahren, Hauptabschnitt 2: Prüfung der Störfestigkeit gegen dieEntladung statischer Elektrizität (dt. Fassung von IEC 1000-4-2: 1995,Klassifikation VDE 0847 Teil 4-2).DIN IEC 60050-161:1990-08Internationales Elektrotechnisches Wörterbuch, Teil 161:Elektromagnetische Verträglichkeit. .1)draft at present2)DIS (Draft International Standard) at present3)CD (Committee Draft) at presentPage 4MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-081.4DefinitionsRefer to Part 1 of this Standard1.5Test conditionsRefer to Part 1 of this Standard1.6Test planRefer to Part 1 of this Standard1.7Test report and statementRefer to Part 1 of this Standard1.8Test voltagesThe permissible test voltages are indicated in Table 1.1.Table 1.1: Permissible test voltagesOnboard system U p in V12 V13,5 ± 0,224 V27 ± 0,242 V42 ± 0,5Page 5MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-08 2Measuring and test equipment2.1Shielded enclosureRefer to Part 1 of this Standard2.2Absorber-lined chamberRefer to Part 1 of this Standard2.3Ground planeThe ground plane shall be a metal panel (e.g. copper, copper zinc alloy (brass) or electroplated steel) with a minimum thickness of 1 mm. Unless otherwise indicated, the dimensions of the ground plane shall be 2 m x1 m. The size finally selected depends, however, on the dimensions of the device under test. The groundplane shall be connected to the ground of the test equipment.2.4StriplineA stripline consists of a conductive strip over a ground plane. For a schematic diagram of a strip line designrefer to Figure 2.1.terminating resistorFigure 2.1: Schematic diagram of a stripline designIt is capable of carrying a TEM mode. The impedance of the stripline primarily depends on the ratio between the strip width and the height above the ground plane. The line shall be terminated on one side (e.g. using a suitable terminating resistor). DIN ISO 11452-5 describes the design of a stripline in detail.A stripline with a nominal impedance of 90 W is preferred, whereby only the TEM mode can be propagated upto 200 MHz4). Due to the emission, the stripline shall be operated in an absorber-lined chamber (refer to 4)This restricts the maximum dimensions of the stripline.Page 6MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-082.5TEM cellA TEM cell consists of a conductive strip – the so-called septum – which is mounted insulated within a shielded enclosure. For a schematic diagram of a TEM cell refer to Fig. 2.2.conductor panelinner conductor (septum)Fig. 2.2: Schematic diagram of a TEM cell design.The design of a TEM cell is described in detail in DIN ISO 11452-3.A TEM cell with a nominal impedance of 50 W is preferred, whereby only the TEM mode can be propagatedup to 200 MHz 5). The TEM cell does not need to be operated in a shielded enclosure or an absorber-lined 2.6Coupling clampA coupling clamp allows the capacitive coupling of fast transient pulses in a harness. For a schematic diagram refer to Figure 2.3.moveableFig. 2.3: Schematic diagram of a coupling clamp.The coupling clamp to be used is described in detail in DIN ISO 7637-3. Its typical coupling capacity is approx. 100 pF and it has an impedance (without fitted harness) of 50 W .2.7Current clampCurrent clamp are current transformers which can be used both for injecting and measuring current in cables without interrupting the conductor.2.7.1Current injection clampCurrent injection clamp are optimised for the injection of currents in lines. They shall be dimensioned adequately with regard to their frequency range and injected power.5)This restricts the maximum dimensions of the TEM cell.Page 7MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-082.7.2Current measuring probeA current measuring probe is a hinged current transformer which is used to determine the strength of currents in an electrical conductor or cable. No direct (metallic) connection with the conductor is required in this process. The probe is arranged around the conductor to be tested which becomes a primary winding with one turn. The probe itself is the secondary winding with many turns. It shall have an output impedance of 50W . No saturation of the core shall occur either through the RF currents to be measured nor through the load currents.2.8Artificial networks2.8.1Transient disturbance emissionThe artificial network in accordance with DIN 40839-1 shall be used. This artificial network is intended tosimulate the harness impedance. For a schematic diagram, refer to Figure 2.4.A B BFig. 2.4: Artificial network in accordance with DIN 40839-1.2.8.2RF disturbance emissionThe artificial mains network in accordance with DIN VDE 0879-2 shall be used.The artificial mains network is intended:· to provide a defined RF impedance at the connections of the device under test,· to decouple the device under test from undesired RF signals from the power supply system, and ·to couple the RF disturbance voltage into the measuring receiver.For a schematic diagram refer to Figure 2.5.ABW(Input impedance/termination)50Fig. 2.5: Artificial network in accordance with DIN VDE 0879-2.The 50 W measuring receiver shall be connected to the measuring terminals M.Page 8MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-082.9Electronic power switchAn electronic power switch in accordance with DIN 40839-1 shall be used for defined disconnection of the battery. The specifications in accordance with Table 2.1 shall be complied with.Table 2.1: Electronic power switch specifications.Dielectric strength U max = 400 V at 25 ACurrent-carrying capacityImax= 25 Afor short periods (≤ 1 s) 100 AVoltage drop∆U≤ 1 V at 25 ATest voltages U1 = 13,5 V U2 = 27 V U3 = 42 VSwitching times 200 ... 400 ns with device under test (R = 0,6 W; L = 50 m H(at 1 kHz))2.10ESD simulatorRefer to Section 2.4 of Part 1 of this Standard2.11Coupling planesCoupling planes are used for ESD testing in order to conduct transient field tests. In this process, a discharge onto a metallic plate adjacent to the device under test using the ESD simulator is carried out. Horizontal and vertical coupling planes are used.2.11.1Vertical coupling planes (VCP)A vertical coupling plane is a metal panel with a thickness of no less than 0,25 mm and dimensions 0,5 m x0,5 m. It is conductively connected to the ground plane via 2 resistors with 470 k W and arranged in an upright position.2.11.2Horizontal coupling planes (HCP)A horizontal coupling plane is a metal panel with a thickness of no less than 0,25 mm and dimensions 1,6 mx 0,8 m. It may be larger where required by the test set-up. It is conductively connected to the ground plane via 2 resistors with 470 k W and arranged horizontally.2.12Insulating basesInsulating bases shall be between 0,5 mm and 2 mm thick and shall demonstrate a dielectric constant of between 2 and 5 (e.g. Polyethylene or Teflon). Their dielectric strength shall be maintained up to at least25 kV, and they shall rise at least 10 mm at all sides above their insulating devices.Page 9MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-083Emitted disturbances3.1Conducted emissions3.1.1Transient emissions conducted along supply linesThe test shall be carried out in analogy with DIN 40839-1. The disturbance voltage emission conducted along the supply lines of devices is measured whereby the device (or the coupled devices) shall be operated as intended.An autonomous measurement of inductive loads can be dispensed with, if · these are only ever installed together in an electrical/electronic system across all platforms,· the disturbance suppression circuit to limit the voltage transient is integrated in an electrical / electronic system,·crosstalk through the wiring harness is impossible.3.1.1.1Test set-upFor a schematic diagram of the test set-up refer to Figures 3.1 and 3.2.Fig. 3.1: Transient emission measurement. Device under test with one supply voltage connection.Fig. 3.2: Transient emission measurement. Device under test with two supply voltage connections.·Devices under test where the ground connection in the vehicle is via the vehicle body, shall be placed directly on the ground plane and connected with it. The ground plane serves as ground connection of the test under device with the artificial network.Page 10MBN 10 284-2 : 2001-08·Devices under test where the ground connection in the vehicle is via dedicated cable shall be placed ona 50 mm high insulating base.·Lines between devices under test and artificial mains network(s) shall be routed at a height of 50 mm above the ground plane and should be 200 mm long.·Switches shall be designed in accordance with DIN 40839-1 (refer to Section 2.9).·Artificial networks in accordance with DIN 40839-1 (refer to Section 2.8.1, integrated in switch, if possible) shall be used.·Selection of equivalent resistance R s: unless otherwise specified, 40 W shall be used for 12 V and 24 V connections and 120 W for 42 V connections.·The storage oscilloscopes shall have a sampling rate of at least 2 GS/s and an analog bandwidth of 500 MHz.·The probes shall be placed as close to the device under test as possible.·The battery shall be buffered, i.e. the battery voltage shall be maintained at the relevant test voltage by constant charging.3.1.1.2Test procedure·Electric motors which can be run to the locked status in normal operation shall be measured in their locked state.·Continuous disturbance sources shall be measured with closed switch.·Where the disturbance voltage is a consequence of switching off, the measurement shall commence at the moment when the switch is opened and record the complete disturbance emission.·In case of devices under test with two supply voltage connections, two measurements (switch-off of U1 / U2) shall be carried out.3.1.1.3Requirement·12 V and 42 V devices under testDeviating from DIN 40839-1, no classification of the disturbances emitted is made. The voltage shall not exceed the value of U tr,max = 75 V irrespective of the pulse shape.·24 V devices under testSeverity level III defined in DIN 40839-1 shall be achieved, i.e. the limit values indicated in Table 3.1 depending on the pulse shape (see test pulses in Section 4.1.1.2) shall not be exceeded.Table 3.1: Limit values for 24 V devices under test.Characteristic pulse shape Test pulsePermissible pulse amplitudeV1-150 275 3a75 3b-140 5a1503.1.2Radio disturbances conducted along supply linesRadio disturbance emissions conducted along supply lines shall be measured in analogy with DIN VDE 0879-2 within the frequency range of 150 kHz ... 110 MHz using one or several Artificial networks allowing the decoupling of the disturbance voltage.3.1.2.1Test set-upTest set-ups are illustrated in Figure 3.3.if requireda) Device under test with long ground line.b) Device under test with short ground line.c) Alternators and generatorsif requiredInsulating spacer,if requiredFig. 3.3: RF emissions conducted along supply lines: Test set-up.· The ground plane shall be no smaller than 400 mm x 1000 mm.·Artificial networks in accordance with DIN VDE 0879-2 (refer to Section 2.8.2) shall be used.· A measuring receiver in accordance with DIN VDE 0876-16-16)shall be connected to the measuringterminals M of the artificial mains network.· The cables between the device under test and the artificial mains network shall be routed at a height of50 mm above the ground plane and shall be no longer than 200 mm.· The test set-ups for devices under test with several supply voltage connections shall be supplementedaccordingly.6)see page 33.1.2.2Test conditionsAction shall be taken to ensure that the device under test emits its maximum disturbance power (occurring during normal operation) during the measurement.Broadband measurements shall be carried out using a quasi-peak detector, while an average detector shall be used for narrowband measurements.3.1.2.3RequirementThe measured values shall be below the limit values indicated in Table 3.2.Table 3.2: RF emissions conducted along supply lines: Limit values.Test No.BandFrequency rangeMHzMeasuringbandwidthkHzNarrowbandaveragedB(m V)Broadbandquasi-peakdB(m V)1LW0,15 ... 0,39 / 105060 2MW0,53 ... 1,79 / 103450 3a SW5,8 ... 6,39 / 103340 3b SW7,1 ... 7,69 / 103340 3c SW9,3 ... 109 / 103340 3d SW11,5 ... 12,19 / 103340 3e SW13,6 ... 13,89 / 103340 3f SW15 ... 15,79 / 103340 4a11 m25 ... 359 / 1024-4b11 m25 ... 35100 / 120-245TVI/IIVHF40 ... 110100 / 120242464m65 ... 889 / 1024-74mSpecialpurpose84,015 ... 87,2559 / 1012-3.1.3Radio disturbance currents conducted along control/signal linesThe emitted radio disturbance currents shall be measured on control and signal lines in analogy with DIN VDE 0879-2 using a current probe within a frequency range of 0,15 MHz ... 110 MHz.3.1.3.1Test set-upFor a schematic diagram of the measuring set-up, refer to Fig. 3.4.Measuring instrumentTest benchFig. 3.4: Measurement of radio disturbance currents conducted along control and signal lines.·Measurements shall be carried out in a shielded enclosure (refer to Section 2.1 of Part 1 of this Standard).·The power supply shall be effected via an artificial mains network (refer to Section 2.8.2) in accordance with DIN VDE 0879-2.· A current measuring probe (refer to Section 2.7.2) shall be used designed for the frequency range 0,15 MHz ... 110 MHz.·The bench on which the device under test, the test harness and the artificial mains network(s) are arranged, shall be 900 mm high and no less than 2500 mm long. A ground plane (refer to Section 2.3) with the same dimensions shall be placed on this table and conductively connected with the wall of the shielded enclosure.·The test harness shall be 1500 mm ± 75 mm long and routed 50 mm above the ground plane.·The device under test and all parts of the harness shall be installed at a distance of 100 mm ± 10 mm away from the edge of the ground plane.·The measuring instrument shall be placed outside the shielded enclosure.3.1.3.2Test conditions·Measurements shall be taken at the following four points:- at a distance of 50 mm from the terminals of the device under test;- at a distance of 500 mm ± 10 mm from the terminals of the device under test;- at a distance of 1000 mm ± 10 mm from the terminals of the device under test;- at a distance of 50 mm from the terminals of the artificial network.·Action shall be taken to ensure that the device under test emits its maximum disturbance power (occurring during normal operation) during the measurement.·Broadband measurements shall be carried out using a quasi-peak detector, while an average detector shall be used for narrowband measurements.3.1.3.3RequirementsAll measured values shall be below the limit values indicated in Table 3.3.Table 3.3: RF emissions conducted along control and signal lines: Limit values.Test No.BandFrequency rangeMHzMeasuringbandwidthkHzNarrowbandaveragedB(m A)Broadbandquasi-peakdB(m A)1LW0,15 ... 0,39 / 103040 2MW0,53 ... 1,79 / 10622 3a SW5,8 ... 6,39 / 10- 16 3b SW7,1 ... 7,69 / 10- 16 3c SW9,3 ... 109 / 10- 16 3d SW11,5 ... 12,19 / 10- 16 3e SW13,6 ... 13,89 / 10- 16 3f SW15 ... 15,79 / 10- 16 4a11 m25 ... 359 / 10- 6-4b11 m25 ... 35100 / 120-65TVI/IIVHF40 ... 110100 / 120- 10- 1064m65 ... 889 / 10- 10-74mSpecial.purpose84,015 ... 87,2559 / 10- 16-3.2Emission3.2.1Measurement with antennaThe emission of components shall be measured in analogy with DIN VDE 0879-2 in an absorber-lined chamber (refer to Section 2.2 of Part 1 of this Standard) with an antenna in the frequency range of 80 MHz ...960 MHz.。
基于塑料镜片防水加硬抗老化光学薄膜的研制付秀华;刘禹冰;熊仕富;郭贵新;杨永亮【摘要】Aiming at solving the problem that surface of optical plastic is easy to be scratched, will have film crack at high temperature, Ti3O5 and SiO2 are selected as high and low refractive index coating material because of its stable mechanical properties in room temperature in this paper.According to theory of thin film, TFCalc software are used to achieve film system design, and electron beam evaporation and ion beam assist deposition are used to deposit coating material Finally, new anti-water fluorine material are deposited by resistance depositing.Through selecting new material SV-55 as connecting layer, adhesion of plastic lens and film is enhanced and problem of SiO2 and plastic lens expansion coefficient mismatch is solved,which improves ability of temperature resistance of plastic lenses.Through continuous optimization of experimental parameters, reflectivity of green antireflection film is less than or equal to 1% at 400 nm~700 nm.Results show that, plastic lenses have the ability to resist friction, aging and hydrophobicity, and can be widely used.%为了解决现有光学塑料镜片表面易划伤、高温时容易发生膜裂的问题,选取机械性能稳定的Ti3O5、SiO2作为高、低折射率材料,依据光学薄膜理论,采用TFCalc软件设计膜系,通过电子束加热蒸发和离子源辅助沉积薄膜,在膜系的最外层用电阻加热法镀制防水膜.通过选择新材料SV-55作为连接层,增强了塑料镜片与膜层的附着力,解决了膜系与塑料镜片膨胀系数不匹配的问题,提高了塑料镜片的抗温能力.通过优化工艺参数,得到400 nm~700 nm反射率R≤1%的绿色减反膜.测试结果显示,研制的薄膜具有耐摩擦、抗老化、防水和防油污的特性.【期刊名称】《应用光学》【年(卷),期】2017(038)001【总页数】6页(P83-88)【关键词】光学薄膜;光学塑料;减反膜;离子源辅助沉积【作者】付秀华;刘禹冰;熊仕富;郭贵新;杨永亮【作者单位】长春理工大学光电工程学院,吉林长春 130022;长春理工大学光电工程学院,吉林长春 130022;长春理工大学光电工程学院,吉林长春 130022;长春理工大学光电工程学院,吉林长春 130022;长春理工大学光电工程学院,吉林长春130022【正文语种】中文【中图分类】TN305.8;O484光学塑料因其质量轻、价格低、色散小、易加工成型等优点,现如今在很多领域逐步取代了光学玻璃[1]。
Revision 31May 1999USNRC REGULA TORY GUIDESRegulatory Guides are issued to describe and make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the NRC staff in its review of applications for permits and licenses. Regulatory guides are not substitutes for regulations, and compliance with them is not required. Methods and solutions different from those set out in the guides will be acceptable if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission.This guide was issued after consideration of comments received from the public. Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at all times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new information or experience.Written comments may be submitted to the Rules Review and Directives Branch, DFIPS, ADM, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.The guides are issued in the following ten broad divisions:1.Power Reactors 6.Products2.Research and T est Reactors7.Transportation3.Fuels and Materials Facilities8.Occupational Health4.Environmental and Siting9.Antitrust and Financial Review5.Materials and Plant Protection10.GeneralSingle copies of regulatory guides may be obtained free of charge by writing the Printing, Graphics and Distribution Branch, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; or by fax at (301)415-5272.Issued guides may also be purchased from the National T echnical Information Service on a standing order basis. Details on this service may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.REGULATORY GUIDE 1.84(Draft was issued as DG–1048)DESIGN AND FABRICATION CODE CASE ACCEPTABILITY,ASME SECTION III, DIVISION 1A. INTRODUCTIONSection 50.55a, “Codes and Standards,” of 10 CFR Part 50, “Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,” requires, in part, that components of the reactor coolant pressure boundary be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested in accordance with the requirements for Class 1 components of Section III, “Nuclear Power Plant Components,”11 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure V essel Code or equivalent quality standards. Footnote 6 to 10 CFR 50.55a states that the use of specific Code Cases may be authorized by the Commission upon request pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3), which requires that proposed alternatives to the described requirements or portions thereof provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.General Design Criterion 1, “Quality Standards and Records,” of Appendix A, “General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants,” to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that structures, systems, and components important to safety be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested to quality standards commensurate with the importance of the safety function to be performed. Where generally recognized codes and standards are used, Criterion 1 requires that they be identified and evaluated to determine their applicability, adequacy, and sufficiency and be supplemented or modified as necessary to ensure a quality product in keeping with the required safety function.Criterion 30, “Quality of Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary,” of the same appendix requires, in part, that components that are part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary be designed, fabricated, erected, and tested to the1Copies may be obtained from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Three Park Avenue, New York, New York 10016-5990. Phone (212)591-8500; fax (212)591-8501.highest quality standards practical.Appendix B, “Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants,” to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that measures be established for the control of special processing of materials and that proper testing be performed.This regulatory guide lists those Section III ASME Code Cases oriented to design and fabrication that are generally acceptable to the NRC staff for implementation in the licensing of light–water–cooled nuclear power plants. The guide is being revised to update the NRC's position on new Code Cases, revised Code Cases, and annulled Code Cases since Revision 30 of the guide was issued in October 1994.This regulatory guide contains no information collection activities and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).B. DISCUSSIONThe ASME Boiler and Pressure V essel Committee publishes a document entitled “Code Cases.”12 Generally, the individual Code Cases that make up this document explain the intent of Code rules or provide for alternative requirements under special circumstances.Most Code Cases are eventually superseded by revision to the Code and then are annulled by action of the ASME. In such cases, the intent of the annulled Code Case becomes part of the revised Code, and therefore continued use of the Code Case intent is sanctioned under the rules of the Code. In other cases, the Code Case is annulled because it is no longer acceptable or there is no further requirement for it. A Code Case that was approved for a particular situation and not for a generic application should be used only for construction of the approved situation because annulment of such a Code Case could result in construction that would not meet Code requirements.The Code Cases listed in this guide are limited to those cases applicable to Section III that are oriented toward design and fabrication.All published Code Cases in the area of design and fabrication that are applicable to Section III of the Code and were in effect on May 12, 1994, were reviewed for inclusion in this guide. In addition to the listing of acceptable Code Cases, this revision of the guide includes listings of (1) Code Cases that were identified as acceptable in a prior version of this regulatory guide and that were annulled after the original issuance of this guide (June 1974) and (2) Code Cases that were identified as acceptable in a prior version of this regulatory guide and that were superseded by revised Code Cases after the original issuance of this guide (June 1974). Code Cases that are not listed herein are either not endorsed or will require supplementary provisions on an individual basis to attain endorsement status.The endorsement of a Code Case by this guide constitutes acceptance of its technical position for applications not precluded by regulatory or other requirements or by the recommendations in this or other regulatory guides. Contingent endorsement is indicated in Regulatory Position 1.c for specific cases. However, it is the responsibility of the user to make certain that no regulatory requirements are violated and that there are no conflicts with other recommended limitations resulting from Code Case usage.Acceptance or endorsement by the NRC staff applies only to those Code Cases or Code Case revisions with the date of ASME approval as shown in the Regulatory Position of this guide. Earlier or later revisions of a Code Case are not endorsed by this guide. New Code Cases will require evaluation by the NRC staff to determine whether they qualify for inclusion in the approved list. Because of the continuing change in the status of Code Cases, it is planned that this guide will require periodic updating to accommodate new Code Cases and any revisions of existing Code Cases.C. REGULATORY POSITION1. ACCEPTABLE CODE CASESThe Section III ASME Code Cases23 listed below (by number, date of ASME approval, and title) are acceptable *Lines indicate substantive changes from Revision 30.2A numerical listing of the Code Cases appears in the appendix.to the NRC staff for application in the construction of components for light–water–cooled nuclear power plants. Their use is acceptable within the limitations stated in the “Inquiry” and “Reply” sections of each individual Code Case, within the limitations of such NRC or other requirements as may exist, and within the additional limitations recommended by the NRC staff given with the individual Code Case in the listing. The categorization of Code Cases used in this guide is intended to facilitate the Code Case listing and is not intended to indicate a limitation on its usage.a.Design–Oriented Code Cases (Code Case Number, Date of ASME Approval,34 and Title):(1)Code Cases Applicable to Piping Design:N–122–204–28–94Procedure for Evaluation of the Design of Rectangular Cross Section Attachments on Class1 Piping, Section III, Division 1N–160–107–18–85Finned Tubing for Construc–07–18–88tion, Section III, Division 103–14–9103–14–94N–453–204–30–92Nickel–Chromium–Molybdenum–Copper Stainless Steel (UNS N08925 and N08926) Seamless and Welded Pipe for Class 2 and 3 Construction, Section III, Division 1N–454–104–30–92Nickel–Chromium–Molybdenum–Copper Stainless Steel (UNS N08925 and N08926) Wrought Fittings for Class 2 and 3 Construction Section III, Division 1N–455–104–30–92Nickel–Chromium–Molybdenum–Copper Stainless Steel (UNS N08925 and N08926) Forged Flanges and Fittings for Class 2 and 3 Construction, Section III, Division 1(2)Code Cases Applicable to Valve Design:N–133–307–18–85Use of SB–148 Alloys 952 and07–18–88954, Section III, Division 1,03–14–91Class 303–14–94N–31305–11–81Alternate Rules for Half–11–28–83Coupling Branch Connections,11–28–86Section III, Division 111–28–8911–28–92N–39402–20–84Restricting Lift to Achieve07–30–86Reduced Relieving Capacities07–30–89of Full Lift, Nozzle Type, and07–27–92Flat Seated Safety and Safety Relief V alves for Compressible Fluid Applications, Section III, Division 1, Classes 2 and 3N–41012–05–84Certified Relieving Capacities07–27–88of Pressure Relief V alves03–14–91Having Set Pressure of 3 psig03–14–94up to but Not Including 15 psig Installed for Overpressure Protection of Compressible Fluid Systems, Section III, Division 1, Classes 2 and 3(3)Other Code Cases Related to Design:N–122–204–28–94Procedure for Evaluation of the Design of Rectangular Cross Section Attachments on Class 3When more than one date is given, the earlier date is that on which the Code Case was approved by the ASME and the later date(s) is that on which the Code Case was reaffirmed by the ASME.1 Piping, Section III, Division 1N–24308–30–79Boundaries Within Castings07–16–82Used for Core Support Struc–05–19–85tures, Section III, Division 1,05–19–88Class CS03–14–9103–14–94N–309–112–05–85Identification of Materials for07–27–88Component Supports, Section03–14–91III, Division 1N–411–102–20–86Alternative Damping V alues02–20–89for Response Spectra Analysis04–30–92of Classes 1, 2, and 3 Piping,Section III, Division 1Code Case N–411–1 is acceptable subject to the following conditions in addition to those conditions specified in the Code Case: (1) The Code Case damping should be used completely and consistently, if used at all. (For equipment other than piping, the damping values specified in Regulatory Guide 1.61, “Damping V alues for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants,” should be used.) (2) The damping values specified may be used only in those analyses in which current seismic spectra and procedures have been employed. Such use should be limited only to response spectral analyses (similar to that used in the study supporting its acceptance—Reference NUREG/CR–3526-). (3) When used for reconciliation work or for support optimization of existing designs, the effects of increased motion on existing clearances and on line mounted equipment should be checked. (4) This Code Case is not appropriate for analyzing the dynamic response of piping systems using supports designed to dissipate energy by yielding (i.e., the design of which is covered by Code Case N–420). (5) This Code Case is not applicable to piping in which stress corrosion cracking has occurred unless a case–specific evaluation is made and is reviewed by the NRC staff.N–42002–14–85Linear Energy Absorbing Sup–02–14–88ports for Subsection NF,03–14–91Classes 1, 2, and 3 Construc–03–14–94tion, Section III, Division 1N–43312–16–86Non–Threaded Fasteners for12–16–89Section III, Division 1,12–16–92Class 1, 2, and 3 Component and Piping Supports, Section III, Division 1N–47605–06–89Class 1, 2, 3, and MC Linear07–27–92Component Supports—Design Criteria for Single Angle Members, Section III, Division 1, Subsection NFN–50507–27–92Alternative Rules for the Examination of Butt Welds Used as Closure Welds for Electrical Penetration Assemblies in Containment Structures, Section III, Division 1N–51102–12–93Design Temperature for Atmospheric and 0–15 PSI Storage Tanks, Section III, Division 1 N–52012–09–93Alternative Rules for Renewal of N–type Certificates for Plants Not in ActiveConstruction, Section III, Division 1b.Fabrication–oriented Code Cases(1)Code Cases Related to Welding and Brazing:N–154–112–05–85Projection Resistance Welding12–05–88of V alve Seats, Section III,02–05–92Division 1, Class 1, 2, and 3V alvesN–304–402–23–87Use of 20Cr–25Ni–6Mo (Alloy12–11–89UNS N08366) Plate, Sheet,02–12–93Strip and Welded Pipe, Class 2and 3 Section III, Division 1N–31502–14–83Repair of Bellows, Section III,02–19–86Division 102–19–8902–05–92Code Case N–315 is acceptable subject to the following conditions in addition to those conditions specified in the Code Case: Prior to repair the user will qualify the repair procedures on a full-scale mockup bellow to ensure that the repair meets all design requirements for bellows.N–345–112–13–82Attachment of AMS 538206–30–88Alloy 31 Seat Rings by Fric–03–14–91tion Welding, Section III,03–14–94Division 1, Classes 1, 2, and 3N–391–107–24–89Procedure for Evaluation of the07–27–92Design of Hollow Circular Cross Section Welded Attachments on Class 1 Piping, Section III, Division 1Code Case N–391–1 is acceptable subject to the following conditions in addition to those specified in the Code Case: The following typographical errors need to be corrected:1.In equation (3) the + sign should be changed to an = sign.2.In equation (4) the first + sign should be changed to an = sign.N–392–212–11–92Procedure for Evaluation of the Design of Hollow Circular Cross Section WeldedAttachments on Classes 2 and 3 Piping, Section III, Division 1N–39311–28–83Repair Welding Structural Steel07–30–86Rolled Shapes and Plates for07–30–89Component Supports, Section07–27–92III, Division 1N–39512–11–89Laser Welding, Section III,12–11–92Division 1N–45203–08–89Specialized Subcontracted04–30–92Welding Process (Electron Beam W elding), Section III, Division 1N–46403–08–89Laser Welding of Lap–Joints,04–30–92Section III, Division 1, Class 2 and 3 Construction(2)Other Code Cases Related to FabricationN–24003–19–79Hydrostatic Testing of Open01–21–82Ended Piping, Section III,09–17–84Division 109–17–8708–14–9008–14–93N–24107–09–79Hydrostatic Testing of Piping,01–21–82Section III, Division 109–17–8409–17–8712–11–8912–11–92N–36807–06–83Pressure Testing of Pump06–30–87Discharge, Section III,08–14–90Division 1, Classes 2 and 308–14–93N–36902–14–83Resistance Welding of02–19–86Bellows, Section III, Divi–02–19–89sion 102–05–92c.Code Cases with Contingent ApprovalN–62–705–11–94Internal and External V alve Items, Section III, Division 1, Class 1, 2, and 3 Code Case N–62–7 is acceptable subject to the following condition in addition to those conditions specified in the Code Case: The Code requires that Class 1 and Class 2 valve manufacturers meet the provisions of NCA 4000,“Quality Assurance,” and, in addition, Class 3 valve manufacturers should also meet the provisions of NCA 4000. 1792–201–08–79Fiberglass Reinforced Thermo–(N–155–2)01–21–82setting Resin Pipe, Section III,01–21–85Division 101–21–8803–14–9103–14–94Code Case 1792–2 (N–155–2) is acceptable subject to the following condition in addition to those conditions specified in the Code Case: The applicant should satisfy the additional limitations that are specified in Regulatory Guide 1.72, “Spray Pond Piping Made from Fiberglass–Reinforced Thermosetting Resin.”N–192–209–16–81Use of Braided Flexible Con–09–17–84nectors, Section III, Division 1,09–17–87Class 2 and 308–14–9008–14–93N–28408–25–80Metal Containment Shell05–25–83Buckling Design Methods,07–30–86Section III, Division 1, Class07–30–89MC07–27–92Code Case N–284 is acceptable subject to the following condition in addition to those conditions specified in theCode Case: If axisymmetric techniques are employed in the analysis of vessels with large openings, the applicability of the methodology in these applications should be demonstrated.N–29201–05–81Depositing Weld Metal Prior to11–28–83Preparing Ends for Welding,07–30–86Section III, Division 1, Class 1,07–30–892, and 3 Construction07–27–92Code Case N–292 is acceptable subject to the following conditions in addition to those conditions specified in the Code Case: Class 3 piping that is longitudinally welded and that has a weld efficiency factor of 1.0 as selected from Table ND–3613.4–1 should receive a 100 percent volumetric examination (RT or UT) of the deposited weld metal in accordance with the requirements of ND–5000.N–318–504–28–94Procedure for Evaluation of theDesign of Rectangular Cross Section Attachments on Class 2 or 3 Piping, Section III, Division 12. ANNULLED CODE CASESCode Cases that were endorsed by the NRC in a prior version of this guide and were later annulled by action of the ASME should be considered as deleted from the list of acceptable Code Cases as of the date of the ASME action that approved the annulment. Such Code Cases, which were annulled on or after July 1, 1974, are listed below by number, effective dates,45 and title.51361–203–09–72Socket Welds, Section III03–01–79Code Case 1361–2 was acceptable when used in connection with Section III, paragraph NB–3356, Fillet Welds. 1461–16603–09–72Electron Beam Welding, Sec–02–16–77tion I, III, and VIII, Division 1 and 21470–2712–18–72External Pressure Charts for11–04–74High–Strength Carbon Steels and for Low–Alloy Steels, Section VIII, Division 1 and 2, and Section III1471–103–09–72V acuum Electron Beam Weld–01–01–78ing of Tube Sheet Joints, Section III1477–103–09–72Use of 1970 Addenda of ANSI01–01–78B31.7, Section III1494–103–03–73Weld Procedure Qualification01–01–78Test, Section III150612–13–71Stress Intensification Factors,01–01–78Section III, Class 2 and 3 Piping1516–208–11–75Welding of Seats or Minor In–(N–24)07–01–78ternal Permanent Attachments in V alves for Section III Applications1516–2711–20–788Welding of Seats or Minor In–4Earlier date—date Code Case was approved by ASME; later date—date Code Case was annulled. Where more than two dates appear, the last date is the date that the Code Case was annulled. The middle date (or dates) was the date of reaffirmation of the Code Case.5Code Cases 1355–3, 1534, and 1554, which were listed in the original issue of the guide, were annulled by ASME action prior to July 1, 1974.6Code Case 1461–1 is no longer listed as a Section III Code Case and is therefore deleted from the acceptable listing.7The annulment of Code Case 1470–2 was effective upon ASME approval of Code Case 1630. However, because of an oversight, the annulment was not noted until publication of Supplement No. 13 to the 1974 Code Cases.8This revision of the Code Case was originally approved by the ASME on 8–11–75 and was annulled on 7–1–78 because of the publication of revisions to Section III in the Winter 1977 Addenda. However, the users did not believe that the Code Case was covered in the Code revision; therefore, ASME reaffirmed the Case on 11–20–78. Because of these circumstances and because there were no changes in the Code Case, the NRC considers that this Case(N–24)01–01–80ternal Permanent Attachments in V alves for Section III Applications15339806–14–72Pressure Temperature Ratings07–01–75of SA–351 Grades CF8A, CF3, and CF3M, Section III1535–204–30–73Hydrostatic Testing of Section03–21–77III, Class 1 V alves153608–14–72Closing Seam for Electrical07–01–77Penetrations for Section III, Class 2, 3, and MC1539–111–21–77Metal Bellows and Metal Dia–(N–30–1)01–01–81phragm Stem Sealed V alves,Section III, Division 1, Classes1, 2, and 3N–31–107–18–85Elastomer Diaphragm V alves,07–18–88Section III, Class 2 and 303–14–9107–01–93Code Case N–31–1 was acceptable subject to the following conditions in addition to those conditions specified in the Code Case: Each applicant who applies the Code Case should indicate in the referencing Safety Analysis Report that the service life of the elastomer diaphragm should not exceed the manufacturer's recommended service life. This recommended service life should not exceed 1/3 of the minimum cycle life as established by the requirements of paragraph 3 of the Code Case. In addition, the service life of the elastomer diaphragm should not exceed 5 years, and the combined service and storage life of the elastomer diaphragm should not exceed 10 years.1541–305–15–78Hydrostatic Testing of Em–(N–32–3)07–01–79bedded Class 2 and Class 3 Piping for Section III, Division 1 ConstructionN–32–403–16–81Hydrostatic Testing of Em–03–16–84bedded Class 2 and 3 Piping for Section III, Division 1 Construction Code Case N–32–4 was acceptable subject to the following conditions in addition to those conditions specified in the Code Case:The acceptance was based on the following clarification and interpretation. Code Case N–32–4 does not replace paragraph NC/ND 6129, “Provisions for Embedded or Inaccessible Welded Joints in Piping,” of the Code. The intent of the Code Case is to (1) provide additional testing above Code requirement and (2) permit liquid penetrant or magnetic particle testing in place of radiographic testing for Class 3 piping with 3/8” nominal wall thickness or less.Paragraph (1) contains an additional requirement to the Code. It was, therefore, acceptable but unnecessary to include in the Code Case. Paragraph (2) is a variation in the volumetric examination technique and was acceptable as written. Paragraph (3) contains an additional requirement and is not a relaxation of the Code. It was, therefore, acceptable but unnecessary to include in the Code Case.1552–108–29–77Design by Analysis of Section(N–35–1)07–01–79III, Class 1 V alves1553–1903–03–75Upset Heading and Roll01–01–76Threading of SA–453 for Bolting in Section III1555–101–14–77Certification of Safety Relief01–01–78V alves, Section III, Division 1was in effect during the period 7–1–78 through 11–20–78.9Code Case was annulled on date as indicated, but the annulment was first indicated in Revision 12 to this guide.1569903–03–7510Design of Piping for Pressure07–01–79Relief V alve Station, Section IIICode Case 1569 was acceptable subject to compliance with the recommendations contained in Regulatory Guide 1.67, “Installation of Over–pressure Protection Devices.”157304–30–73V acuum Relief V alves, Section01–01–78III157404–30–73Hydrostatic Test Pressure for12–31–74Safety Relief V alves, Section III1580–111–05–73Buttwelded Alignment Toler–01–01–78ance and Acceptable Slopes for Concentric Centerlines for Section III, Class 1, 2, and 3 Construction158106–25–73Power–Operated Pressure Re–03–01–79lief V alves, Section III158808–13–73Electro–Etching of Section III(N–46)03–19–79Code Symbols03–19–82160111–05–73Limits of Reinforcement for07–01–74Two–Thirds Area, Section III, Class 11606–112–16–74Stress Criteria Section III,07–01–77Classes 2 and 3 Piping Subject to Upset, Emergency, and Faulted Operating Conditions Code Case 1606–1 was acceptable subject to the interpretation that the stress limit designations of “Upset,”“Emergency,” and “Faulted” do not necessarily imply agreement with specified plant conditions applicable to ASME Code Class 2 and 3 components for fluid systems. These designations should be established and justified in the design specifications.1607–111–04–74Stress Criteria for Section III,07–01–77Classes 2 and 3 V essels Designed to NC/ND–3300 Excluding the NC–3200 Alternate Code Case 1607–1 was acceptable subject to the interpretation that the stress limit designations of “Upset,”“Emergency,” and “Faulted” do not necessarily imply agreement with specified plant conditions applicable to ASME Code Class 2 and 3 components for fluid systems. These designations should be established and justified in the design specifications.N–55–104–05–84Inertia and Continuous Drive(1609)04–05–87Friction Welding, Section III, Division 1161412–17–7310Hydrostatic Testing of Piping01–01–79Prior To or Following the Installation of Spray Nozzles for Section III, Classes 1, 2, and 3 Piping Systems162003–02–74Stress Category for Partial Pen–(N–61)01–08–79etration Welded Penetrations,01–08–82Section III, Class 1 Construc–tion10Corrected date.162303–02–74Design by Analysis for Section03–01–79III, Class 1 Sleeve–Coupled and Other Patented Piping Joints1630–107–10–78External Pressure Charts for(N–66–1)07–10–81High Yield Strength Carbon Steels and Low Alloy Steels. (Yield Strength above 38 Ksi to60 Ksi Inclusive.) For Section III, Class 1, 2, 3, and MC1630–11012–11–8111External Pressure Charts for(N–66–1)12–05–84High Yield Strength Carbon12–05–87Steels and Low Alloy Steels. (Yield Strength above 38 Ksi to 60 Ksi Inclusive.) Section III, Division 1, Class 1, 2, 3, and MC163304–29–74Brazing of Seats to Class 1, 2,01–01–78and 3 V alve Body or Bonnets, Section III1635–11208–12–7411Stress Criteria for Section III,07–01–77Class 2 and 3 V alves Subjected to Upset, Emergency, and Faulted Operating Conditions Code Case 1635–1 was acceptable subject to the interpretation that the stress limit designations of “Upset,”“Emergency,” and “Faulted” do not necessarily imply agreement with specified plant conditions applicable to ASME Code Class 2 and 3 components for fluid systems. These designations should be established and justified in the design specifications.1636–11208–12–74Stress Criteria for Section III,07–01–77Class 2 and 3 Pumps Subjected to Upset, Emergency, and Faulted Operating Conditions Code Case 1636–1 was acceptable subject to the interpretation that the stress limit designations of “Upset,”“Emergency,” and “Faulted” do not necessarily imply agreement with specified plant conditions applicable to ASME Code Class 2 and 3 components for fluid systems. These designations should be established and justified in the design specifications.165108–12–74Interim Requirements for Cer–03–01–79tification of Component Supports, Section III, Subsection NF165711–04–74Stress Criteria for Class 2 and07–01–77 3 Atmospheric and Low Pressure (0–15 psig) Steel Storage Tanks165911–04–74Interconnection of Two Piping07–01–77Systems for Section III, Class 1, 2, and 3 Construction166011–04–74Overpressure Protection Under(N–77)03–01–79Emergency Operating Conditions for Section III, Class 1166111–04–74Postweld Heat Treatment01–01–78P–No.1 Materials for Section III, Class 1 V essels166211–04–74Shop Assembly of Compo–01–01–78nents, Appurtenances and Piping Subassemblies for Section III, Class 1, 2, 3 and MC Construction166511–04–74Pressure–Temperature Ratings11The Code Case was annulled on July 10, 1981 (ASME mandatory annulment date). It was reinstated on December 11, 1981. Because of the circumstances and because there were no changes in the Code Case, the NRC considers that this Case was in effect during the period of 7–10–81 through 12–11–81.12Code Cases 1635 and 1636 were approved by ASME on July 1, 1974, and revised on August 12, 1974. Because Code Cases 1635 and 1636 were not in effect on September 1, 1974, they are not included in this guide.。