ch04 国际经济学课后答案与习题(萨尔瓦多)

  • 格式:pdf
  • 大小:86.06 KB
  • 文档页数:13

下载文档原格式

  / 13
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

*CHAPTER 4

(Core Chapter)

THE HECKSCHER-OHLIN AND OTHER TRADE THEORIES

OUTLINE

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Factor Endowments and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory

4.3 The Formal Heckscher-Ohlin Model

Case Study 4-1 The Revealed Comparative Advantage of Various Countries and Regions

4.4 Factor-Price Equalization and Income Distribution

Case Study 4-2 Has International Trade Increased U.S. Wage Inequalities?

4.5 Empirical Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory

4.6 Economies of Scale and International Trade

Case Study 4-3 The New International Economies of Scale

4.7 Trade Based on Product Differentiation

Case Study 4-4 Growth of Intra-Industry Trade

4.8 Technological Gap and Product Cycle Models

Case Study 4-5: The United States as the Most Competitive Economy in the World

4.9 Transportation Costs and International Trade

4.10 Environmental Standards and International Trade

Appendix The Specific-Factors Model and Intra-Industry Trade Models

A4.1 The Specific-Factors Model

A4.2 A Model of Intra-Industry Trade

Key Terms

International

of

scale

economies prices

Relative

factor

products Heckscher–Ohlin (H–O) theory Differentiated

trade

Intra-industry

Heckscher–Ohlin

theorem

(H–O)

Factor-proportions or factor-endowment theory Technological gap model

cycle

model

Product

Factor–price equalization theorem

costs

Transportation

Stolper-Samuelson

theorem

model Nontraded goods and services Specific-factors

paradox Environmental standards

Leontief

Monopolistic

competition

scale

returns

Increasing

to

Lecture Guide

1. This is one of the most important and difficult chapters in the book. It is also a long chapter and

requires four lectures to cover adequately.

2. In the first lecture, I would cover sections 1-

3. Section 3 is one of the most important sections in

the book because it presents the H-O model. I would proceed slowly and carefully in explaining Figure 4.1 and compare it to the standard trade model of Figure 3.4.

3. In the second lecture, I would cover sections 4 and 5. Section 4 on the factor-price equalization

theorem and income distribution is a difficult section. Case Study 4-2 should be of great interest to the students and give rise to a great deal of class discussion.

4. In third lecture, I would cover sections sections 6-7, paying a great deal of attention to section 7

on trade in differentiated products.

5. In fourth lecture, I would cover the rest of the chapter.

Answers to Review Questions and Problems

1. a. The Heckscher–Ohlin (H-0) theorem postulates that a nation will export those commodi- ties whose production requires the intensive use of the nation’s relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the commodities whose production requires the intensive use

of the nation’s relatively scarce and expensive factor. In short, the relatively labor-rich

nation exports relatively labor-intensive commodities and imports the relatively

capital-intensive commodities.

b. Heckscher and Ohlin identify the relative difference in factor endowments among

nations as the basic determinant of comparative advantage and international trade.

c. The H-O Theory represent an extension of the standard trade model because it explains the basis for comparative advantage (classical economists, such as Ricardo had assumed it) and examines the effect of international trade on factor prices and income distribution (which classical economists had left unanswered).

2. See Figure 1 on the next page.

3. a. The factor–price equalization theorem postulates that international trade will bring about the equalization of the returns to homogeneous or identical factors across nations.

b. The Stopler-Samuelson theorem postulates that free international trade reduces the real

income of the nation’s relatively scarce factor and increases the real income of the nation’s relatively abundant factor.