金融学专业商业银行信贷风险管理外文文献翻译中3000字.

商业银行信贷风险管理外文文献翻译中文3000多字Credit risk management is a XXX business。

financing ns。

payment and settlement。

and other XXX。

credit XXX risk factor for commercial banks。

XXX such as life risk and uncertainty.Effective credit risk management is essential for commercial banks to minimize the impact of credit losses。

This involves identifying and assessing potential risks。

XXX strategies。

XXX。

By doing so。

commercial banks XXX the potential for credit losses.One of the key components of credit risk management iscredit analysis。

This involves evaluating the orthiness of borrowers to determine the likelihood of default。

Credit analysis XXX's financial history。

credit score。

collateral。

XXX credit analysis。

commercial banks can make informed lending ns and minimize the risk of default.Another important aspect of credit risk management is credit XXX can also help commercial banks XXX.In n。

金融风险管理外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)原文：Enterprise Risk Management in InsuranceEnterprise Risk Management (hereinafter referred as “ERM”) interests a wide range of professions (e.g., actuaries, corporate financial managers, underwriters, accountants,and internal auditors), however, current ERM solutions often do not cover all risks because they are motivated by the core professional ethics and principles of these professions who design and administer them. In a typical insurance company all such professions work as a group to achieve the overriding corporate objectives.Risk can be defined as factors which prevent an organization in achieving its objectives and risks affect organizations holistically. The management of risk in isolation often misses its big picture. It is argued here that a holistic management of risk is logical and is the ultimate destination of all general management activities.Moreover, risk management should not be a separate function of the business process;rather, managing downside risk and taking the opportunities from upside risk should be thekey management goals. Consequently, ERM is believed as an approach to risk management, which provides a common understanding across the multidisciplinary groups of people of the organization. ERM should be proactive and its focus should be on the organizations future. Organizations often struggle to see and understand the full risk spectrum to which they are exposed and as a result they may fail to identify the most vulnerable areas of the business. The effective management of risk is truly an interdisciplinary exercise grounded on a holistic framework.Whatever name this new type of risk management is given (the literature refers to it by diverse names, such as Enterprise Risk Management, Strategic Risk Management, and Holistic Risk Management) the ultimate focus is management of all significant risks faced by the organization. Risk is an integral part of each and every action of the organization in the sense that an organization is a basket of contracts associated with risk (in terms of losses and opportunities). The idea of ERM is simple and logical, but implementation is difficult. This is because its involvement with a wide stakeholder community, which in turn involves groups from different disciplines with different beliefs and understandings. Indeed, ERM needs theories (which are the interest of academics) but a grand theory of ERM (which invariably involves an interdisciplinary concept) is far from having been achieved.Consequently, for practical proposes, what is needed is the development of a framework(a set of competent theories) and one of the key challenges of this thesis is to establish the key features of such a framework to promote the practice of ERM. Multidisciplinary Views of RiskThe objective of the research is to study the ERM of insurance companies. In line with this it is designed to investigate what is happening practically in the insurance industry at the current time in the name of ERM. The intention is to minimize the gap between the two communities (i.e., academics and practitioners) in order to contribute to the literature of risk management.In recent years ERM has emerged as a topic for discussion in the financial community,in particular, the banks and insurance sectors. Professional organizations have published research reports on ERM. Consulting firms conducted extensive studies and surveys on the topic to support their clients. Rating agencies included theERM concept in their rating criteria. Regulators focused more on the risk management capability of the financial organizations. Academics are slowly responding on the management of risk in a holistic framework following the initiatives of practitioners.The central idea is to bring the organization close to the market economy. Nevertheless,everybody is pushing ERM within the scope of their core professional understanding.The focus of ERM is to manage all risks in a holistic framework whatever the source and nature. There remains a strong ground of knowledge in managing risk on an isolated basis in several academic disciplines (e.g., economics, finance, psychology,sociology, etc.). But little has been done to take a holistic approach of risk beyond disciplinary silos. Moreover, the theoretical understanding of the holistic (i.e., multidisciplinary)properties of risk is still unknown. Consequently, there remains a lack of understanding in terms of a common and interdisciplinary language for ERM.Risk in FinanceIn finance, risky options involve monetary outcomes with explicit probabilities and they are evaluated in terms of their expected value and their riskiness. The traditional approach to risk in finance literature is based on a mean-variance framework of portfolio theory, i.e., selection and diversification. The idea of risk in finance is understood within the scope of systematic (non-diversifiable) risk and unsystematic (diversifiable)risk. It is recognized in finance that systematic risk is positively correlated with the rate of return. In addition, systematic risk is a non-increasing function of a firm’s growth in terms of earnings. Another established concern in finance is default risk and it is argued that the performance of the firm is linked to the firm’s default risk. A large part of finance literature deals with severa l techniques of measuring risks of firms’ investment portfolios (e.g., standard deviation, beta, VaR, etc.). In addition to the portfolio theory, Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) was discovered in finance to price risky assets on the perfect capital markets. Finally, derivative markets grew tremendously with the recognition of option pricing theory.Risk in EconomicsRisk in economics is understood within two separate (independent) categories,i.e.,endogenous (controllable) risk and background (uncontrollable) risk. It is recognized that economic decisions are made under uncertainty in the presence of multiple risks.Expected Utility Theory argues that peoples’ risk attitude on the size of risk (small,medium, large) is derived from the utility-of-wealth function, where the utilities of outcomes are weighted by their probabilities. Economists argue that people are risk averse (neutral) when the size of the risks is large (small).Prospect theory provides a descriptive analysis of choice under risk. In economics, the concept of risk-bearing preferences of agents for independent risks was described under the notion of “ standard risk aversion.” Most of the economic research on risk is originated on the study of decision making behavior on lotteries and other gambles. Risk in PsychologyWhile economics assumes an individual’s risk preference is a function of probabilistic beliefs, psychology explores how human judgment and behavior systematically forms such beliefs. Psychology talks about the risk taking behavior (risk preferences).It looks for the patterns of human reactions to the context, reference point,mental categories and associations that influence how people make decisions.The psychological approach to risk draws upon the notion of loss aversion that manife sts itself in the related notion of “regret.” According to Willett; “risk affects economic activity through the psychological influence of uncertainty.” Managers’ attitude of risk taking is often described from the psychological point of view in terms of feelings.Psychologists argue that risk, as a multidisciplinary concept, can not be reduced meaningfully by a single quantitative treatment. Consequently, managers tend to utilize an array of risk measurers to assist them in the decision making process under uncertainty. Risk perception plays a central role in the psychological research on risk, where the key concern is how people perceive risk and how it differs to the actual outcome. Nevertheless, the psychological research on risk provides fundamental knowledge of how emotions are linked to decision making.Risk in SociologyIn sociology risk is a socially constructed phenomenon (i.e., a social problem) and defined as a strategy referring to instrumental rationality. The sociologicalliterature on risk was originated from anthropology and psychology is dominated by two central concepts. First, risk and culture and second, risk society. The negative consequences of unwanted events (i.e., natural/chemical disasters, food safety) are the key focus of sociological researches on risk. From a sociological perspective entrepreneurs remain liable for the risk of the society and responsible to share it in proportion to their respective contributions. Practically, the responsibilities are imposed and actions are monitored by state regulators and supervisors.Nevertheless, identification of a socially acceptable threshold of risk is a key challenge of many sociological researches on risk.Convergence of Multidisciplinary Views of RiskDifferent disciplinary views of risk are obvious. Whereas, economics and finance study risk by examining the distribution of corporate returns, psychology and sociology interpret risk in terms of its behavioral components. Moreover, economists focus on the economic (i.e., commercial) value of investments in a risky situation.In contrast, sociologists argue on the moral value (i.e., sacrifice) on the risk related activities of the firm. In addition, sociologists’ criticism of economists’concern of risk is that although they rely on risk, time, and preferences while describing the issues related to risk taking, they often miss out their interrelationships(i.e., narrow perspective). Interestingly, there appears some convergence of economics and psychology in the literature of economic psychology. The intention is to include the traditional economic model of individuals’ formal rational action in the understanding of the way they actually think and behave (i.e., irrationality).In addition, behavioral finance is seen as a growing discipline with the origin of economics and psychology. In contrast to efficient market hypothesis behaviour finance provides descriptive models in making judgment under uncertainty.The origin of this convergence was due to the discovery of the prospect theory in the fulfillment of the shortcomings of von Neumann-Morgenstern’s utility theory for providing reasons of human (irrational) behavior under uncertainty (e.g., arbitrage).Although, the overriding enquiry of disciplines is the estimation of risk, they comparing and reducing into a common metric of many types of risks are there ultimate difficulty. The key conclusion of the above analysis suggests that there existoverlaps on the disciplinary views of risk and their interrelations are emerging with the progress of risk research. In particular, the central idea of ERM is to obscure the hidden dependencies of risk beyond disciplinary silos.Insurance Industry PracticeThe practice of ERM in the insurance industry has been drawn from the author’s PhD research completed in 2006. The initiatives of four major global European insurers(hereinafter referred as “CASES”) were studied for this purpose. Out of these four insurers one is a reinsurer and the remaining three are primary insurers. They were at various stages of designing and implementing ERM. A total of fifty-one face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with key personnel of the CASES in between the end of 2004 and the beginning of 2006. The comparative analysis (compare-and-contrast) technique was used to analyze the data and they were discussed with several industry and academic experts for the purpose of validation. Thereafter,a conceptual model of ERM was developed from the findings of the data.Findings based on the data are arranged under five dimensions. They are understanding;evaluation; structure; challenges, and performance of ERM. Understanding of ERMIt was found that the key distinction in various perceptions of ERM remains between risk measurement and risk management. Interestingly, tools and processes are found complimentary. In essence, meaning that a tool can not run without a process and vice versa. It is found that the people who work with numbers (e.g.,actuaries, finance people, etc.) are involved in the risk modeling and management(mostly concerned with the financial and core insurance risks) and tend to believe ERM is a tool. On the other hand internal auditors, company secretaries, and operational managers; whose job is related to the human, system and compliance related issues of risk are more likely to see ERM as a process.ERM: A ProcessWithin the understanding of ERM as a process, four key concepts were found. They are harmonization, standardization, integration and centralization. In fact, they are linked to the concept of top-down and bottom-up approaches of ERM.The analysis found four key concepts of ERM. They are harmonization,standardization,integration and centralization (in decreasing order of importance). It was also found that a unique understanding of ERM does not exist within the CASES, rather ERM is seen as a combination of the four concepts and they often overlap. It is revealed that an understanding of these four concepts including their linkages is essential for designing an optimal ERM system.Linkages Amongst the Four ConceptsAlthough harmonization and standardization are seen apparently similar respondents view them differently. Whereas, harmonization allows choices between alternatives,standardization provides no flexibility. Effectively, harmonization offers a range of identical alternatives, out of which one or more can be adopted depending on the given circumstances. Although standardization does not offer such flexibility,it was found as an essential technique of ERM. Whilst harmonization accepts existing divergence to bring a state of comparability, standardization does not necessarily consider existing conventions and definitions. It focuses on a common standard, (a “top-down” approach). Indeed, integration of competent policies and processes,models, and data (either for management use, compliance and reporting) are not possible for global insurers without harmonizing and standardizing them. Hence, the research establishes that a sequence (i.e., harmonization, standardization, integration,and then centralization) is to be maintained when ERM is being developed in practice (from an operational perspective). Above all, the process is found important to achieve a diversified risk culture across the organization to allocate risk management responsibilities to risk owners and risk takers.ERM: A ToolViewed as a tool, ERM encompasses procedures and techniques to model and measure the portfolio of (quantifiable) enterprise risk from insurers’ core disciplinary perspective. The objective is to measure a level of (risk adjusted) capital(i.e., economic capital) and thereafter allocation of capital. In this perspective ERM is thought as a sophisticated version of insurers’ asset-liability management.Most often, extreme and emerging risks, which may bring the organization down,are taken into consideration. Ideally, the procedure of calculating economic capital is closely linked to the market volatility. Moreover, the objective is clear, i.e., meetingthe expectation of shareholders. Consequently, there remains less scope to capture the subjectivity associated with enterprise risks.ERM: An ApproachIn contrast to process and tool, ERM is also found as an approach of managing the entire business from a strategic point of view. Since, risk is so deeply rooted in the insurance business, it is difficult to separate risk from the functions of insurance companies. It is argued that a properly designed ERM infrastructure should align risk to achieve strategic goals. Alternatively, application of an ERM approach of managing business is found central to the value creation of insurance companies.In the study, ERM is believed as an approach of changing the culture of the organization in both marketing and strategic management issues in terms of innovating and pricing products, selecting profitable markets, distributing products, targeting customers and ratings, and thus formulating appropriate corporate strategies. In this holistic approach various strategic, financial and operational concerns are seen integrated to consider all risks across the organization.It is seen that as a process, ERM takes an inductive approach to explore the pitfalls (challenges) of achieving corporate objectives for broader audience (i.e.,stakeholders) emphasizing more on moral and ethical issues. In contrast, as a tool,it takes a deductive approach to meet specific corporate objectives for selected audience(i.e., shareholders) by concentrating more on monitory (financial) outcomes.Clearly, the approaches are complimentary and have overlapping elements. 作者：M Acharyya译文：保险业对企业风险管理的实证研究企业风险管理涉及各种行业(如保险精算师、公司财政经理、保险商、会计和内部审计员)，当前企业风险管理解决方案往往不能涵盖所有的风险，因为这些方案取决于决策者和执行则的专业道德和原则。

文献信息：文献标题：Credit Risk Management Strategies and Their Impact on Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya（信贷风险管理策略及其对肯尼亚商业银行绩效的影响）国外作者：Samuel Warui Mutua，Muoni Gekara文献出处：《Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research》,2017, 3(4):1896-1904字数统计：英文2891单词，15678字符；中文4915汉字外文文献：Credit Risk Management Strategies and Their Impact on Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya Abstract Credit risk management strategies are amongst the most critical factors to consider for any financial institution involved in any lending activity. Financial institutions have often find themselves making decisions between lending to potential borrowers thus effectively growing their balance sheets and effectively increasing their returns and being cautious in lending to caution themselves against any potential losses. Specifically, the research sought to examine credit risk management strategies and their impact on performance of commercial banks in Kenya. The research was guided by the liquidity theory of credit, portfolio theory, credit risk theory and the tax theory of credit.The research was based on a descriptive design which involves describing the current state of affairs by use of data collected through questionnaires and interviews. The research was focused on selected Tier III commercial banks in Kenya namely Consolidated Bank, African Banking Corporation and Credit Bank with reference to the loans department. The sampled population consists of 62 staff members from loans department of Consolidated Bank, African Banking Corporation and CreditBank. Primary data was collectedthrough the use of closed ended questionnaires, pick and drop procedure was used to collect data through use of the registered offices of the targeted loans departments of the target banks. Data analysis was done both quantitatively using tables and charts; this was then summarized, coded, tabulated and analyzed using both descriptive statistics and measures of variability with aid of SPSS package. Tables and graphs were used to present the data collected for ease of understanding and analysis. From the findings, the study concludes that credit risk management strategies including credit risk rating risks, credit approval risks, portfolio management risks and security perfection risks positively affect performance of commercial banks in Kenya.Key words: Credit risk management practices, commercial banks1.IntroductionCredit risk refers to the potential for loss as a resultof failure of counter party to meet their obligations of paying the financial institution according to the agreed terms. Credit exposures may arise from both banking and trading books. Management of credit risks requires a framework of well set out policies and procedures covering measurement and management of the credit risk (Barth et al, 2004).While financial institutions have faced difficulties over the years for a multitude of reasons, the major cause of serious banking problems continues to be directly related to lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties, poor portfolio risk management, or a lack of attention to changes in economic or other circumstances that can lead to a deterioration in the credit standing of a bank’s counterparties. This experience is common in both the developed and developing countries.For most banks, loans are the largest and most obvious source of credit risk; however, other sources of credit risk exist throughout the activities of a bank,including in the banking book and in the trading book, and both on and off the balance sheet. Banks are increasingly facing credit risk (or counterparty risk) in various financial instruments other thanloans, including acceptances, interbank transactions, trade financing, foreign exchange transactions, financial futures, swaps,bonds, equities, options, and in the extension of commitments and guarantees, and the settlement of transactions.Each bank should develop a credit risk strategy or plan that establishes the objectives guiding thebank’s credit-granting activities and adopt the necessary policies and procedures for conducting such activities. The credit risk strategy, as well as significant credit risk policies, should be approved and periodically (at least annually) reviewed by the board of directors. The board needs to recognize thatthe strategy and policies must cover the many activities of the bank in which credit exposure is a significant risk (Haron et al, 2007).Credit Management is a financial management aspect that includes credit underwriting that encompasses analysis, approval, security perfection, portfolio management and debt recovery. Nzotta (2004) indicated that credit management directly influences the success or failures of financial institution involved in lending activities. He indicated that on the hindsight of lending being directly proportionalto the quantum of deposits received from the public, any unwise credit underwriting would translateto loss of depositors’ funds and losses to the financial institutions thereof.According to a report by Earnest and Young of 2013 on the banking environment in East Africa, it is reported that banks in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Rwanda recorded growth rates in asset book of 16%, 14%, 13% and 12% respectively. This was on the advent of introduction of credit bureaus that was expected to improve on credit underwriting by improving decision making by 89% and effectively help reduce Non Performing portfolios across the board by 94%. Between the year 2009 and 2013, banks in Tanzania grew their CAGR by 17.5% with loans and advances outpacing overall asset growth which grew by 22.5% over the same period. In Uganda, the CAGR of banks grew by 13% whilst the growth in Rwanda was 12% in an economy that grew by 4.6%. In the period under review high loan provisioning occasioned by aggressive pursuit by various players to grow their balance sheets withouta simultaneous enhanced credit underwriting amongst other factors was highlighted as a reason high provisions were witnessed.Josiah Aduda and James Gitonga (2011) carried out a research on the relationship between credit risk management and profitability among the commercial banks in Kenya. They found out that a strong relationship does exist between credit management and profitability and that most banks held to this belief. Gatuhu (2011) conducted a research on the effect of financial performance of credit management on the financial performance of microfinance institutions in Kenya. Gatuhu found that there existed a strong relationship between credit appraisal of microfinance institutions, credit risk control and collection policy and the overall performance of microfinance institutions in Kenya. The period commencing second half of the year 2015 to the first half of 2016 witnessed particularly difficult times for the banking industry in Kenya with 3 out the then existing 43 commercial banks going under or being placed under statutory management. These were influenced by in one way directly or indirectly to issues revolving around weak credit management strategies.2.Statement of the ProblemThe main objective of any institution involved in money lending is to ensure that a healthy return is realized adequate to cover for all the risks assumedin addition to covering the foregone time value for money. In trying to attain this objective, prudence must be exercised to en sure that unnecessaryrisk isn’t taken that would most probably lead to unprecedented losses. It is for this reason that various institutions involved in money lending are guided by various frameworks to ensure care is exercised in making such decisions.There is an extensive literature on the managementof credit risk in commercial banks. Kealhofer (2003) did a research study on risk-adjusted performance measures in commercial banks. The measures, however, focus on risk-return trade-off, i.e. measuring the risk inherent in each activity and charge it accordingly for the capital required to support it. Greuning and Bratanovic (2003), studied sound credit granting process; maintaining an appropriate credit administration that involves monitoring process as well as adequate controls over credit risk.Clear established process for approving new credits and extending the existingcredits has been observed to be very important while managing credit risk (Heffernan, 2003). Mwirigi, (2006) didan assessment of the credit risk management techniques adopted by various MFIs in Kenya and ascertained that a considerable number of them had credit policies to enable them make informed credit decisions that stroke a balance between businessandrisk perspectives. Ndwiga, (2010) and Chege, (2010) both did a research to ascertain the relationship between credit risk management and the financial performance of MFIs in Kenya.There is no known study that has been done on strategic credit policies for risk management, thus knowledge gap. This study aims at establishing the credit risk management used by commercial banks and how they affect performance of the commercial banks. This research study is motivated to bridge the gap by investigating credit risk management strategies employed by commercial banks, especially Tier III banks in Kenya and how this impacts on their financial performance. In the commercial banks, management of credit risk has caused bank losses in developing countries, including Kenya. Effective credit risk management system minimizes the credit risk, hence the level of loan losses.3.Theoretical Review3.1.Liquidity Theory of CreditThis theory, first proposed by (Emery, 2009), proposes that credit rationed firms use more trade credit than those with normal access to financial institutions. The central point of this notion is that when a firm is financially inhibited the offer of trade credit can make up for the decline of credit offer from lending institutions.Inaccordwith thisview,those firms presenting good liquidity or better access to capital markets can finance those that are credit rationed. Several methodologies have tried to obtain empirical confirmation in order to support this assumption. Nielsen (2012), using small firms as proxy for credit rationed firms, firms find that when there is liquidity tightening in the economy, to ensure their sustainability, they are obligated to advance credit terms to their customers. As financially liberal firms are less likely to seek trade credit terms and more likely toextend the same, a negative relation between a buyers’ access to other sources of financing and trade credit is expected. (Petersen & Rajan, 2007) obtained evidence supporting this negative relation.3.2.Portfolio TheoryPortfolio theory of investment tries to optimize the expected portfolio return for a given proportion of portfolio risk or equivalently decrease the risk for a given level of anticipated return, by carefully choosing the mixed proportions of several assets. Portfolio theory is extensively used in practice in the financial sector and several of its inventors won a Nobel Prize for the same. In modern years the basic portfolio theory has been widely criticized by fields such as behavioral economics (Markowitz, 1952). Portfolio theory was devel oped in 1950’s all through to the early 1970’s and was considered a vital progression in the mathematical modeling of finance. Many theoretical and practical criticisms have since been developed against the same. This include the fact that financial returns do not follow a Gaussian distribution or indeed any symmetric distribution and those correlations between asset classes (Sproul, 1998)3.3.Tax Theory of CreditThe rationale of whether or not to accept a trade credit is based on the ability to access other sources of finances. A buyer is obliged to compare different financing options to find out which will be the most economically viable for them in making cost savings. In any business deal, payment may be on the spot or deferred to a date in the future, in which case a deferred cost element is attached to it in the form of interest. Thus, to find the best sources of funding, the buyer ought to investigate the real cost of borrowing. (Brick and Fung, 1984) suggest that, the tax effect should be considered in order to compare the trade credit cost with the cost of other financing options. The main reason for this is that if sellers and buyers are in different tax brackets, they have different costs of borrowing as their interests are tax allowable. The autho rs’ hypothesis is that; businesses in a high tax bracket tend to advance more trade credit thanthosein low brackets. Subsequently, only buyers in a low tax bracket than the seller will accept credit terms, since those in a higher tax brackets couldborrow more cheaply and directly from a financial organization. Another assumption is that businesses associated with a given sector and placed in a tax bracket below the specific sector average; cannot benefit from offering trade credit. Thus, (Brick and Fung 1984) propose that firms can’t use and offer trade credit.3.4.Credit Risk TheoryUntil barely the 1970s’, Credit risk had not been widely studied, although people have been facing credit risk ever since the very early times. Before 1974, early literature on credit risk used traditional actuarial methods of assessing the same, whosemajor challenge lies in their extensive dependence on historical data. Up to now there are three quantitative approaches of analyzing credit risk: structural approach, reduced form appraisal and incomplete information approach (Crosbie et al, 2003). Melton 1974, presented the credit risk theory else called the structural theory; which said the default event originates from a firm’s asset development displayed by a diffusion process with constant parameters.Such models are ordinarily defined as ‘Structural model’ and based on variables connected to a particular issuer. An evolution of this grouping is characterized by asset of models where the loss provisional on default is exogenously precise. In these models, the nonpayment can happenthroughout all the life of a corporate bond and not only at maturity (Longstaff and Schwartz, 1995).4.MethodologyThe study used descriptive research designAccording to Oso and Onen (2009) prior to carrying out the study there is need to determine the respondents, the data collection procedures, tools and instruments which would aid in data collection. According to Kothari, 2007. It involves describing the current state of affairs by use of data collected through questionnaires and interviews. Descriptive research design is qualitative whose main purpose is description of the state of affairs as it exists.Descriptive research seeks to establish factors associated with certain occurrences, outcomes, conditions or types of behavior. A complete set of people, events or objects from which the study seeks to generalize the results is known aspopulation (Mugenda, 2009). The study will concentrate on the 20 Tier III Commercial Banks Licensed by Central Bank of Kenya.Stratified sampling technique will be used in the collectionofsampleswherethe20TierIIIcommercial banks will be stratified into three categories which are; Government owned, Local Investors owned and Foreign Investor owned, further into male and female, also a mix of Experienced Managers, Senior Officers and Junior Credit officers, out of which 62 Employees will be selected to participate in the study. Purposive sampling will also be used so as to include Heads of Credit Units and also ensure all key credit operational areas are covered in the sample.In this study, a population consists of 62 staff from loans department of Consolidated Bank, African Banking Corporation and Credit Bank.The main tool for data collection in this study was a questionnaire. A closed ended questionnaire was preferred. The questions were designed based on Likert scale which allowed the respondentsto express their view on the study variables. According to Kothari (2007) open - ended questions allow respondents to give answers in their own way, whilst Closed - ended questions or forced choice questions provide an assortment of alternative answers from which the respondent is constrained to choose.The data collected was analyzed and interpretations drawn based on the analysis. Descriptive statistics was used in the analysis of quantitative data. The statistical tool for the analysis was the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) Version 20, which was used to analyze the data whereby the questionnaires would be coded and frequency distributions and percentages run.5.ConclusionsThey have a positive significant relationship on performance of commercial banksin Kenya. Sound credit rating mechanism is perceived as a great contributor towards the performance of credit facilities in commercial banks. This by and large affects the performance of the banks as a whole since the banks’ profitability are hinged on its credit services. There needs to be frequent credit trainings to improve onstaff competencies to ensure they are always kept abreast with developments in the industry to ensure appropriate credit underwriting is always done, this will inturn ensure, proper segmentation and accounts review is also done with an aim to ensure the credit element in a bank is well covered.There is need for inclusion of collateral appraisal. Since the credit approval risks are in turn influenced by therisk appetite of various commercial banks, a matrix acceptable to all banks based on factors such as capital strength and customer bases should be developed to ensure that an institution doesn’t necessarily take up risks that is too high that might impairably damage their overall financial strength and health should any unprecedented shocks materialize due to the risks taken by a bank.There is however need to review the provision requirementsas detailed by the Prudential Guidelines (PGs) to realign the same with the evolving banking environment which has seen a significant shift since the PGs were last reviewed. An all-inclusive forumto realign the provision requirement should be held between all the relevant stakeholders including the regulator (CBK) and the Commercial banks to arrive at ideal reviewed rates in line with the evolved banking environment.There is however need for Tier III banks to be more risk averse to unsecured lending and opt for asset backed lending. This is more so influencedby the fact that their balance sheets are relatively smaller which makes them unable to withstand shocks that may emanate from provisioning that would be occasionedby higherrequirements toprovision forthe unsecured borrowings or weakly secured exposures.中文译文：信贷风险管理策略及其对肯尼亚商业银行绩效的影响摘要信用风险管理策略是所有参与贷款活动的金融机构最重要的考虑因素之一。

银行风险中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)“RISK MANAGEMENT IN COMMERCIAL BANKS”(A CASE STUDY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS) - ABSTRACT ONLY1. PREAMBLE:1.1 Risk Management:The future of banking will undoubtedly rest on risk management dynamics. Only those banks that have efficient risk management system will survive in the market in the long run. The effective management of credit risk is a critical component of comprehensive risk management essential for long-term success of a banking institution. Credit risk is the oldest and biggest risk that bank, by virtue of its very nature of business, inherits. This has however, acquired a greater significance in the recent past for various reasons. Foremost among them is the wind of economic liberalization that is blowing across the globe. India is no exception to this swing towards market driven economy. Competition from within and outside the country has intensified. This has resulted in multiplicity of risks both in number and volume resulting in volatile markets. A precursor to successful management of credit risk is a clear understanding about risks involved in lending, quantifications of risks within each item of the portfolio and reaching a conclusion as to the likely composite credit risk profile of a bank.The corner stone of credit risk management is the establishment of a framework that defines corporate priorities, loan approval process, credit risk rating system, risk-adjusted pricing system, loan-review mechanism and comprehensive reporting system.1.2 Significance of the study:The fundamental business of lending has brought trouble to individual banks and entire banking system. It is, therefore, imperative that the banks are adequate systems for credit assessment of individual projects and evaluating risk associated therewith as well as the industry as a whole. Generally, Banks in India evaluate a proposal through the traditional tools of project financing, computing maximum permissible limits, assessing management capabilities and prescribing a ceiling for an industry exposure. As banks move in to a new high powered world of financial operations and trading, with new risks, the need is felt for more sophisticated and versatile instruments for risk assessment, monitoring and controlling risk exposures. It is, therefore, time that banks managements equip themselves fully to grapple with the demands of creating tools and systems capable of assessing, monitoring and controlling risk exposures in a more scientific manner.Credit Risk, that is, default by the borrower to repay lent money, remains the most important risk to manage till date. The predominance of credit risk is even reflected in the composition of economic capital, which banks are required to keep a side for protection against various risks. According to one estimate, Credit Risk takes about 70% and 30%remaining is shared between the other two primary risks, namely Market risk (change in the market price and operational risk i.e., failure of internal controls, etc.). Quality borrowers (Tier-I borrowers) were able to access the capital market directly without going through the debt route. Hence, the credit route is now more open to lesser mortals (Tier-II borrowers).With margin levels going down, banks are unable to absorb the level of loan losses. There has been very little effort to develop a method where risks could be identified and measured. Most of the banks have developed internal rating systems for their borrowers, but there hasbeen very little study to compare such ratings with the final asset classification and also to fine-tune the rating system. Also risks peculiar to each industry are not identified and evaluated openly. Data collection is regular driven. Data on industry-wise, region-wise lending, industry-wise rehabilitated loan, can provide an insight into the future course to be adopted.Better and effective strategic credit risk management process is a better way to Manage portfolio credit risk. The process provides a framework to ensure consistency between strategy and implementation that reduces potential volatility in earnings and maximize shareholders wealth. Beyond and over riding the specifics of risk modeling issues, the challenge is moving towards improved credit risk management lies in addressing banks’readiness and openness to accept change to a more transparent system, to rapidly metamorphosing markets, to more effective and efficient ways of operating and to meet market requirements and increased answerability to stake holders.There is a need for Strategic approach to Credit Risk Management (CRM) in Indian Commercial Banks, particularly in view of;(1) Higher NPAs level in comparison with global benchmark(2) RBI’ s stipulation about dividend distribution by the banks(3) Revised NPAs level and CAR norms(4) New Basel Capital Accord (Basel –II) revolutionAccording to the study conducted by ICRA Limited, the gross NPAs as a proportion of total advances for Indian Banks was 9.40 percent for financial year 2003 and 10.60 percent for financial year 20021. The value of the gross NPAs as ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was as low as 2.26 percent. Net NPAs as a proportion of net advances of Indian banks was 4.33 percent for financial year 2003 and 5.39 percent for financial year 2002. As against this, the value of net NPAs ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was 0.37 percent. Further, it was found that, the total advances of the banking sector to the commercial and agricultural sectors stood at Rs.8,00,000 crore. Of this, Rs.75,000 crore, or 9.40 percent of the total advances is bad and doubtful debt. The size of the NPAs portfolio in the Indian banking industry is close to Rs.1,00,000 crore which is around 6 percent of India’ s GDP2.The RBI has recently announced that the banks should not pay dividends at more than 33.33 percent of their net profit. It has further provided that the banks having NPA levels less than 3 percent and having Capital Adequacy Reserve Ratio (CARR) of more than 11 percent for the last two years will only be eligible to declare dividends without the permission from RBI3. This step is for strengthening the balance sheet of all the banks in the country. The banks should provide sufficient provisions from their profits so as to bring down the net NPAs level to 3 percent of their advances.NPAs are the primary indicators of credit risk. Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is another measure of credit risk. CAR is supposed to act as a buffer against credit loss, which isset at 9 percent under the RBI stipulation4. With a view to moving towards International best practices and to ensure greater transparency, it has been decided to adopt the ’ 90 days’ ‘ over due’ norm for identification of NPAs from the year ending March 31, 2004.The New Basel Capital Accord is scheduled to be implemented by the end of 2006. All the banking supervisors may have to join the Accord. Even the domestic banks in addition to internationally active banks may have to conform to the Accord principles in the coming decades. The RBI as the regulator of the Indian banking industry has shown keen interest in strengthening the system, and the individual banks have responded in good measure in orienting themselves towards global best practices.1.3 Credit Risk Management(CRM) dynamics:The world over, credit risk has proved to be the most critical of all risks faced by a banking institution. A study of bank failures in New England found that, of the 62 banks in existence before 1984, which failed from 1989 to 1992, in 58 cases it was observed that loans and advances were not being repaid in time 5 . This signifies the role of credit risk management and therefore it forms the basis of present research analysis.Researchers and risk management practitioners have constantly tried to improve on current techniques and in recent years, enormous strides have been made in the art and science of credit risk measurement and management6. Much of the progress in this field has resulted form the limitations of traditional approaches to credit risk management and with the current Bank for International Settlement’ (BIS) regulatory model. Even in banks which regularly fine-tune credit policies and streamline credit processes, it is a real challenge for credit risk managers to correctly identify pockets of risk concentration, quantify extent of risk carried, identify opportunities for diversification and balance the risk-return trade-off in their credit portfolio.The two distinct dimensions of credit risk management can readily be identified as preventive measures and curative measures. Preventive measures include risk assessment, risk measurement and risk pricing, early warning system to pick early signals of future defaults and better credit portfolio diversification. The curative measures, on the other hand, aim at minimizing post-sanction loan losses through such steps as securitization, derivative trading, risk sharing, legal enforcement etc. It is widely believed that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Therefore, the focus of the study is on preventive measures in tune with the norms prescribed by New Basel Capital Accord.The study also intends to throw some light on the two most significant developments impacting the fundamentals of credit risk management practices of banking industry – New Basel Capital Accord and Risk Based Supervision. Apart from highlighting the salient features of credit risk management prescriptions under New Basel Accord, attempts are made to codify the response of Indian banking professionals to various proposals under the accord. Similarly, RBI proposed Risk Based Supervision (RBS) is examined to capture its direction and implementation problems。

商业银行风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)“RISK MANAGEMENT IN COMMERCIAL BANKS”(A CASE STUDY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS) - ABSTRACT ONLY1. PREAMBLE:1.1 Risk Management:The future of banking will undoubtedly rest on risk management dynamics. Only those banks that have efficient risk management system will survive in the market in the long run. The effective management of credit risk is a critical component of comprehensive risk management essential for long-term success of a banking institution. Credit risk is the oldest and biggest risk that bank, by virtue of its very nature of business, inherits. This has however, acquired a greater significance in the recent past for various reasons. Foremost among them is the wind of economic liberalization that is blowing across the globe. India is no exception to this swing towards market driven economy. Competition from within and outside the country has intensified. This has resulted in multiplicity of risks both in number and volume resulting in volatile markets. A precursor to successful management of credit risk is a clear understanding about risks involved in lending, quantifications of risks within each item of the portfolio and reaching a conclusion as to the likely composite credit risk profile of a bank.The corner stone of credit risk management is the establishment of a framework that defines corporate priorities, loan approval process, credit risk rating system, risk-adjusted pricing system, loan-review mechanism and comprehensive reporting system.1.2 Significance of the study:The fundamental business of lending has brought trouble to individual banks and entire banking system. It is, therefore, imperative that the banks are adequate systems for credit assessment of individual projects and evaluating risk associated therewith as well as the industry as a whole. Generally, Banks in India evaluate a proposal through the traditional tools of project financing, computing maximum permissible limits, assessing management capabilities and prescribing a ceiling for an industry exposure. As banks move in to a new high powered world of financial operations and trading, with new risks, the need is felt for more sophisticated and versatile instruments for risk assessment, monitoring and controlling risk exposures. It is, therefore, time that banks managements equip themselves fully to grapple with the demands of creating tools and systems capable of assessing, monitoring and controlling risk exposures in a more scientific manner.Credit Risk, that is, default by the borrower to repay lent money, remains the most important risk to manage till date. The predominance of credit risk is even reflected in the composition of economic capital, which banks are required to keep a side for protection against various risks. According to one estimate, Credit Risk takes about 70% and 30%remaining is shared between the other two primary risks, namely Market risk (change in the market price and operational risk i.e., failure of internal controls, etc.). Quality borrowers (Tier-I borrowers) were able to access the capital market directly without going through the debt route. Hence, the credit route is now more open to lesser mortals (Tier-II borrowers).With margin levels going down, banks are unable to absorb the level of loan losses. There has been very little effort to develop a method where risks could be identified and measured. Most of the banks have developed internal rating systems for their borrowers, but there hasbeen very little study to compare such ratings with the final asset classification and also to fine-tune the rating system. Also risks peculiar to each industry are not identified and evaluated openly. Data collection is regular driven. Data on industry-wise, region-wise lending, industry-wise rehabilitated loan, can provide an insight into the future course to be adopted.Better and effective strategic credit risk management process is a better way to Manage portfolio credit risk. The process provides a framework to ensure consistency between strategy and implementation that reduces potential volatility in earnings and maximize shareholders wealth. Beyond and over riding the specifics of risk modeling issues, the challenge is moving towards improved credit risk management lies in addressing banks’readiness and openness to accept change to a more transparent system, to rapidly metamorphosing markets, to more effective and efficient ways of operating and to meet market requirements and increased answerability to stake holders.There is a need for Strategic approach to Credit Risk Management (CRM) in Indian Commercial Banks, particularly in view of;(1) Higher NPAs level in comparison with global benchmark(2) RBI’ s stipulation about dividend distribution by the banks(3) Revised NPAs level and CAR norms(4) New Basel Capital Accord (Basel –II) revolutionAccording to the study conducted by ICRA Limited, the gross NPAs as a proportion of total advances for Indian Banks was 9.40 percent for financial year 2003 and 10.60 percent for financial year 20021. The value of the gross NPAs as ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was as low as 2.26 percent. Net NPAs as a proportion of net advances of Indian banks was 4.33 percent for financial year 2003 and 5.39 percent for financial year 2002. As against this, the value of net NPAs ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was 0.37 percent. Further, it was found that, the total advances of the banking sector to the commercial and agricultural sectors stood at Rs.8,00,000 crore. Of this, Rs.75,000 crore, or 9.40 percent of the total advances is bad and doubtful debt. The size of the NPAs portfolio in the Indian banking industry is close to Rs.1,00,000 crore which is around 6 percent of India’ s GDP2.The RBI has recently announced that the banks should not pay dividends at more than 33.33 percent of their net profit. It has further provided that the banks having NPA levels less than 3 percent and having Capital Adequacy Reserve Ratio (CARR) of more than 11 percent for the last two years will only be eligible to declare dividends without the permission from RBI3. This step is for strengthening the balance sheet of all the banks in the country. The banks should provide sufficient provisions from their profits so as to bring down the net NPAs level to 3 percent of their advances.NPAs are the primary indicators of credit risk. Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is another measure of credit risk. CAR is supposed to act as a buffer against credit loss, which isset at 9 percent under the RBI stipulation4. With a view to moving towards International best practices and to ensure greater transparency, it has been decided to adopt the ’ 90 days’ ‘ over due’ norm for identification of NPAs from the year ending March 31, 2004.The New Basel Capital Accord is scheduled to be implemented by the end of 2006. All the banking supervisors may have to join the Accord. Even the domestic banks in addition to internationally active banks may have to conform to the Accord principles in the coming decades. The RBI as the regulator of the Indian banking industry has shown keen interest in strengthening the system, and the individual banks have responded in good measure in orienting themselves towards global best practices.1.3 Credit Risk Management(CRM) dynamics:The world over, credit risk has proved to be the most critical of all risks faced by a banking institution. A study of bank failures in New England found that, of the 62 banks in existence before 1984, which failed from 1989 to 1992, in 58 cases it was observed that loans and advances were not being repaid in time 5 . This signifies the role of credit risk management and therefore it forms the basis of present research analysis.Researchers and risk management practitioners have constantly tried to improve on current techniques and in recent years, enormous strides have been made in the art and science of credit risk measurement and management6. Much of the progress in this field has resulted form the limitations of traditional approaches to credit risk management and with the current Bank for International Settlement’ (BIS) regulatory model. Even in banks which regularly fine-tune credit policies and streamline credit processes, it is a real challenge for credit risk managers to correctly identify pockets of risk concentration, quantify extent of risk carried, identify opportunities for diversification and balance the risk-return trade-off in their credit portfolio.The two distinct dimensions of credit risk management can readily be identified as preventive measures and curative measures. Preventive measures include risk assessment, risk measurement and risk pricing, early warning system to pick early signals of future defaults and better credit portfolio diversification. The curative measures, on the other hand, aim at minimizing post-sanction loan losses through such steps as securitization, derivative trading, risk sharing, legal enforcement etc. It is widely believed that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Therefore, the focus of the study is on preventive measures in tune with the norms prescribed by New Basel Capital Accord.The study also intends to throw some light on the two most significant developments impacting the fundamentals of credit risk management practices of banking industry – New Basel Capital Accord and Risk Based Supervision. Apart from highlighting the salient features of credit risk management prescriptions under New Basel Accord, attempts are made to codify the response of Indian banking professionals to various proposals under the accord. Similarly, RBI proposed Risk Based Supervision (RBS) is examined to capture its direction and implementation problems。

Interim Measures on Information Disclosure of Commercial BanksOrder No.6 of the People's Bank of ChinaMay 15, 2002Chapter I General ProvisionsArticle 1 These rules are formulated on the basis of "Law on the People's bank of China of the People's Republic of China" and "Commercial Banking Law of the People's Bank of China", which aim to strengthen market discipline of commercial banks, standardize information disclosure of commercial banks, effectively safeguard legitimate interests of depositors and other stakeholders and promote safe, sound and efficient operation of commercial banks.Article 2 These rules are to be applied to commercial banks that are established legally within the territory of the People's Republic of China, including domestic commercial banks, wholly foreign funded banks, joint venture banks and branches of foreign banks. Article 3 Commercial banks should disclose information according to these rules, which are the minimum requirements for commercial banks' information disclosure. While abiding by these rules, commercial banks can disclose more information than what has been required by these rules at their own discretion.In addition to these rules, listed commercial banks should also conform to relevant information disclosure rules published by regulatory body of the securities industry. Article 4 Information disclosure of commercial banks should be proceeded consistent with laws and regulations, the uniform domestic accounting rules and relevant rules of the PBC. Article 5 Commercial banks should disclose information in a standardized fashion, while ensuring authenticity, accuracy, integrity and comparability.Article 6 Annual financial statements disclosed by commercial banks should be subject to auditing by accounting firms that are certified to be engaged in finance-related auditing. Article 7 The People's Bank of China is to supervise commercial banks' information disclosure according to relevant laws and regulations.Chapter II Information to be DisclosedArticle 8 Commercial banks should disclose financial statements, and information on risk management, corporate governance and big events of the year according to these rules. Article 9 Commercial banks' financial statements should include accounting report, annex and notes to this report and description of financial position.Article 10 Accounting report disclosed by commercial banks should include balance sheet, statement of income (profit and loss account), statement of owner's equity and other additional charts.Article 11 Commercial banks should indicate inconsistence between the basis of preparation and the basic preconditions of accounting in their notes to the accounting report.Article 12 Commercial banks should explain in their notes to the accounting report the important policy of accounting and accounting estimates, including: Accounting standards, accounting year, reporting currency, accounting basis and valuation principles; Type and scope of loans; Accounting rules for investment; Scope and method of provisions against asset losses; Principle and method of income recognition; Valuation method for financial derivatives; Conversion method for foreign currency business and accounting report; Preparation method for consolidated accounting report; Valuation and depreciation method for fixed assets; Valuation method and amortization policy for intangible assets; Amortization policy for long-term deferred expenses; Accounting practice for income tax. Article 13 Commercial banks should indicate in their notes to the accounting report crucial changes of accounting policy and estimates, contingent items and post-balance sheet items, transfer and sale of important assets.Article 14 Commercial banks should indicate in their annex and notes to the accounting report the total volume of related party transactions and major related party transactions. Major related party transactions refer to those with trading volume exceeding 30 million yuan or 1% of total net assets of the commercial bank.Article 15 Commercial banks should indicate in their notes to the accounting report detailed breakdown of key categories in the accounting report, including:(1) Due from banks by the breakdown of domestic and overseas markets.(2) Interbank lending by the breakdown of domestic and overseas markets.(3) Outstanding balance of loans at the beginning and the end of the accounting year by the breakdown of credibility loans, committed loans, collateralized loans and pledged loans.(4) Non-performing loans at the beginning and end of the accounting year resulted from the risk-based loan classification.(5) Provisions for loan losses at the beginning and the end of the accounting year, new provisions, returned provisions and write-offs in the accounting year. General provisions, specific provisions and special provisions should be disclosed separately.(6) Outstanding balance and changes of interest receivables.(7) Investment at the beginning and the end of the accounting year by instruments.(8) Interbank borrowing in domestic and overseas markets.(9) Calculation, outstanding balance and changes of interest payables.(10) Year-end outstanding balance and other details of off-balance sheet categories, including bank acceptance bills, external guarantees, letters of guarantee for financing purposes, letters of guarantee for non-financing purposes, loan commitments, letters ofcredit (spot), letters of credit (forward), financial futures, financial options, etc.(11) Other key categories.Article 16 Commercial banks should disclose in their notes to the accounting report status of capital adequacy, including total value of risk assets, amount and structure of net capital, core capital adequacy ratio and capital adequacy ratio.Article 17 Commercial banks should disclose auditing report provided by the appointed accounting firms.Article 18 Description of financial position should cover the general performance of the bank, generation and distribution of profit and other events that have substantial impact on financial position and performance of the bank.Article 19 Commercial banks should disclose following risks and risk management details: (1) Credit risk. Commercial banks should disclose status of credit risk management, credit exposure, credit quality and earnings, including business operations that generate credit risks, policy of credit risk management and control, organizational structure and division of labor in credit risk management, procedure and methods of classification of asset risks, distribution and concentration of credit risks, maturity analysis of over-due loans, restructuring of loans and return of assets.(2) Liquidity risk. Commercial banks should disclose relevant parameters that can represent their status of liquidity, analyze factors affecting liquidity and indicate their strategy of liquidity management.(3) Market risk. Commercial banks should disclose risks brought by changes of interest rates and exchange rate on the market, analyzing impacts of such changes on profitability and financial positions of the bank and indicating their strategy of market risk management.(4) Operation risk. Commercial banks should disclose risks brought by flaws and mistakes of internal procedures, staff and system or by external shocks and indicate the integrity, rationality and effectiveness of their internal control mechanism.(5) Other risks. Other risks that may bring severe negative impact to the bank.Article 20 Commercial banks should disclose following information on corporate governance:(1) Shareholders' meeting during the year.(2) Members of the board of directors and its work performance.(3) Members of the board of supervisors and its work performance.(4) Members of the senior management and their profiles.(5) Layout of branches and function departments.Article 21 Chronicle of events disclosed by commercial banks in the year should at least include the following contents:(1) Names of the ten biggest shareholders and changes during the year.(2) Increase or decrease of registered capital, splitting up and merger.(3) Other important information that is necessary for the general public to know.Article 22 Information of foreign bank branches is to be collected and disclosed by the primary reporting branch.Foreign bank branches don't need to disclose information that is only mandated and required for disclosure by institutions with legal person status.Foreign bank branches should translate into Chinese and disclose the summary of information disclosed by their head offices.Article 23 Commercial banks need not disclose information of unimportant categories. However, if the omission or misreporting of certain categories or information may chan ge or affect the assessment or judge of the information users, commercial banks should regarded the categories as key information categories and disclose them.Chapter III Management of Information DisclosureArticle 24 Commercial banks should prepare in Chinese their annual reports with all the information to be disclosed and publish them within 4 month after the end of each accounting year. If they are not able to disclose such information on time due to special factors, they should apply to the People's Bank of China for delay of disclosure at least 15 days in advance.Article 25 Commercial banks should submit their annual reports to the People's Bank of China prior to disclosure.Article 26 Commercial banks should make sure that their shareholders and stakeholders could obtain the annual reports on a timely basis.Commercial banks should put their annual reports in their major operation venue, so as to ensure such reports are readily available for the general public to read and check. The PBC encourage commercial banks to disclose main contents of their annual reports to the public through media.Article 27 Boards of directors in commercial banks are responsible for the information disclosure. If there is no board of directors in the bank, the president (head) of the bank should assume such a responsibility.Boards of directors and presidents (heads) of commercial banks should ensure the authenticity, accuracy and integrity of the disclosed information and take legal responsibility for their commitments.Article 28 Commercial banks and their involved staff that provide financial statements with false information or concealing important facts should be punished according to the " Rules on Punishment of Financial Irregularities".Accounting firms and involved staff that provide false auditing report should be punished according to the "Interim Measures on Finance-related Auditing Business by AccountingFirms".Chapter IV Supplementary ProvisionsArticle 29 Commercial banks with total assets below RMB 1 billion or with total deposits below RMB 500 million are exempted from the compulsory information disclosure. However, the People's Bank of China encourages such commercial banks to disclose information according to these rules.Article 30 The People's Bank of China is responsible for the interpretation of these rules. Article 31 These rules shall enter into force as of the date of promulgation and are to be applied to all commercial banks except city commercial banks.City commercial banks should adopt these rules gradually from January 1, 2003 to January 1, 2006.中国人民银行令[2002]第6号2002年5月15日第一章总则第一条为加强商业银行的市场约束，规范商业银行的信息披露行为，有效维护存款人和相关利益人的合法权益，促进商业银行安全、稳健、高效运行，依据《中华人民共和国中国人民银行法》、《中华人民共和国商业银行法》等法律法规，制定本办法。

商业银行信用风险外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)估计技术和规模的希腊商业银行效率：信用风险、资产负债表的活动和国际业务的影响1.介绍希腊银行业经历了近几年重大的结构调整。

重要的结构性、政策和环境的变化经常强调的学者和从业人员有欧盟单一市场的建立，欧元的介绍，国际化的竞争、利率自由化、放松管制和最近的兼并和收购浪潮。

希腊的银行业也经历了相当大的改善，通信和计算技术，因为银行有扩张和现代化其分销网络，其中除了传统的分支机构和自动取款机，现在包括网上银行等替代分销渠道。

作为希腊银行（2004 年）的年度报告的重点，希腊银行亦在升级其信用风险测量与管理系统，通过引入信用评分和概率默认模型近年来采取的主要步骤。

此外，他们扩展他们的产品/服务组合，包括保险、经纪业务和资产管理等活动，同时也增加了他们的资产负债表操作和非利息收入。

最后，专注于巴尔干地区（如阿尔巴尼亚、保加利亚、前南斯拉夫马其顿共和国、罗马尼亚、塞尔维亚）的更广泛市场的全球化增加的趋势已添加到希腊银行在塞浦路斯和美国以前有限的国际活动。

在国外经营的子公司的业绩预计将有父的银行，从而对未来的决定为进一步国际化的尝试对性能的影响。

本研究的目的是要运用数据包络分析（DEA）和重新效率的希腊银行部门，同时考虑到几个以上讨论的问题进行调查。

我们因此区分我们的论文从以前的希腊银行产业重点并在几个方面，下面讨论添加的见解。

首先，我们第一次对效率的希腊银行的信用风险的影响通过检查其中包括贷款损失准备金作为附加输入Charnes et al.(1990 年)、德雷克（2001 年）、德雷克和大厅(2003 年)，和德雷克等人（2006 年）。

作为美斯特(1996) 点出"除非质量和风险控制的一个人也许会很容易误判一家银行的水平的低效；例如精打细算的银行信用评价或生产过高风险的贷款可能会被贴上标签一样高效，当相比银行花资源，以确保它们的贷款有较高的质量"(p.1026)。

文献出处：Nicely E. The research of commercial bank credit risk management [J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2015, 8(2): 17-26.原文The research of commercial bank credit risk managementNicely EAbstractCommercial bank credit card business risk management broad sense refers to the commercial bank credit card business, because of various unfavorable factors caused by the issuers, cardholders, specially engaged the possibility of loss. Credit risk refers to the pure credit for credit CARDS are unsecured loans, and credit is not high, the customer more than individual, as well as small amount of single feature, lead to the possibility of loss of card issuers. Through to the commercial Banks to do a good job of credit card risk management put forward the Suggestions and comments, and pay attention to the risks of commercial Banks to establish perfect management system, system, business process research, and put forward the commercial Banks in establishing a system of credit card business management structure, regulations, at the same time, want to notice to each kind of risk identification, measurement, assessment and do a good job in risk loss provisions in personnel management, should pay attention to establish risk rewards and punishment mechanism, pay attention to the positive incentives to the employees.Keywords: Credit CARDS; Risk management; Incentive mechanism1 IntroductionCredit card refers to the bank issued to individuals and units, with the function such as shopping, consumption and access cash bank card. Its striking feature is that the Banks granted to customer a certain line of credit, customers can enjoy the privilege of the reimbursement after be being card first, its form is a positive with the issuing bank name, the period of validity, card number, card, the cardholder's name, article with a magnetic stripe, signature on the back of the information such as bank CARDS. We now call the credit card, generally refers to borrow write down card. Credit risk refers to the bank credit card holders for various reasons failed to fullyrepay bank debt and cause the possibility of default, defaults, bank will because the cardholder does not thereby causing loss to the bank funds paid promptly. Credit card main risk including fraud risk, credit risk, operational risk, accredit card risk management refers to in the process of credit card business, the possible including fraud risk, credit risk, operational risk, etc, all kinds of risk management and control is to reduce the possibility of loss The loss rate of operation and management activities.2 Literature reviewThe concept of risk management since the 30 s of 20th century, after nearly 40 years of development to form a system, gradually by people began to attach importance to and cognition, form a new management discipline. The concept of risk mainly comes from the insurance industry, insurance for risk defined as the uncertainty of loss. In 1964, the United States of the risk management and insurance, it has made the definition: risk book points out that through the risk identification, assessment, and control to achieve with minimum cost to make a management method of minimizing the risk loss. In 1976, eight Gerry, in his book, the risk management of international enterprise, points out that protection of enterprise's financial stability, reduce the loss caused by risk events is the main goal of the enterprise risk management. In 1975, risk management and insurance management society, scholars from all over the world including general principles, risk management was determined by the talk of risk identification and measurement, risk control and other criteria. The establishment of these guidelines, marks all over the world, risk management theory with the preliminary development, management framework has been set up. Also marks the risk management has entered a new stage. In July 2004, Basel 2 rules on commercial Banks, puts forward a new risk management requirements, he fully considered for the bank including market risk, liquidity risk, credit risk and operational risk, a variety of provide for risk identification, risk measurement standard, make risk management work more accurate quantitative measurement. In 2004, the COSO committee issued "enterprise risk management integrated framework", put forward by the enterprise internal control into risk control as the main direction of management thinking. Puts forward the concept of comprehensive risk management,including internal environment, goal setting, time identification, risk evaluation, risk countermeasure, control activities, information and communication and so on eight aspects. American engineer bill fair and Earl joint research and development of the FICO credit score model, since the most card issuers have also been used this model. This model gives the credit scoring system out of a possible 900 points, according to the situation of the borrower's credit history and compare the data with other borrowers, given the borrower credit situation trend in the future.3 Credit card risk3.1 Credit card cash outCredit card cash out to merchants with the bad cardholders or other third party in collusion, or merchants themselves by credit card as the carrier, through the fictitious transactions, asking price, cash return, show the credit card credit behavior, including but not limited to: merchants and cardholders conspired to use point-of-sale terminals (POS), with fictitious transactions, falsely making out the price, cash returns to the behavior of the cardholders to pay cash directly; Or merchants to help paid the cardholder account overdraft, after using the POS machine will advances in fictitious trading way back to their accounts, and collect fees to the cardholder a card such as behavior; Or online merchants cardholders conspired to fictional price, false transactions, such as buying from selling the way, show the credit card for trafficking in fraudulent credit card Internet consumption credit, etc.3.2 False card stolen brushFalse card stolen brush refers to criminals use false card on the POS terminal for credit card transactions to steal bank funds, belong to the important type of fraud. Criminals often by merchants, independent bank terminals, as well as a variety of convenient payment terminal channels, using dedicated track record the equipment needed for the bank card information side track information through various channels, such as the Internet or buy others have steal bank card track information, password access usually by peeping in the cardholder spending places the cardholder password or independent in ATM equipment installed video cameras record customer password, even through ATM keyboard paste, such as false record customer password keyboard,or using client code, easy to guess the cardholder password and other means to obtain the cardholder password.3.3 Online payment fraudOnline payment fraud refers to the fraud part swindled through Internet channels and the cardholder's bank. On-line payment fraud mainly by non-financial institutions or commercial Banks provide online payment channel for fraud. Current fraud activists by phishing site, bank card fraud or Trojan virus, characterized by use of phishing site or Trojan virus to steal the cardholder's bank card number, password and verification code information, phishing cardholders to online trading, to defraud money. Or commercial bank online banking channel for bank card fraud, fraud part using bank online banking vulnerabilities, and the weak link in the online banking fraud.3.4 Operating riskPrevention and control of credit card operation risk, first, to find a good risk points, find out in the hairpin and post-loan risk prone link in the entire process, find out the risk points, and then control the risk. Credit card's life cycle is divided into application stage, audit stage, hairpin used to send phase, activation and post-loan management, such as card renewal phase. First by the applicant voluntarily to the commercial bank to apply for or commercial bank marketing personnel to promote credit card products to the applicant, the applicant according to the guidance of sales people to fill out credit card application form after the above requirements to fill out information, to submit proof of identity is required by the application, work proves that the domicile certificate materials, such as bank marketing personnel will be the applicant's application form submitted to the bank's examination and approval department, by a bank according to the customer qualification examination and approval department for credit card mail after examination and approval to the customer. Customers call the bank customer service special line opened activate the card, the card can normal use, generally the validity of the credit card for 3 ~ 5 years according to the process of the life cycle of credit card sorting operation risk points exist in the whole cycle.4 Conclusions and recommendationsFalse card stolen brush loss brings to the commercial Banks, cardholders Carrie's money is missing, tend to give the feeling of cardholders' money in the bank is not safe, affect the reputation of the bank, bring bank reputation risk. In the process of pursuing for unauthorized, if not solve in time, often commercial Banks must bear a lot of damage. Due to false card stolen brush is not tight to bank losses, and seriously affected the reputation of the bank. So focus on guard against the risk of false card stolen brush is the key of the bank fraud risk control. Commercial bank credit card business is strengthening risk prevention. To do the following: to strengthen the education of the cardholder and prevent unauthorized knowledge propaganda, tip card holders do not use the card to the others, pay attention to protect the password in the daily charge without being stolen. Strengthen the bank back transaction monitoring, summarizes the characteristics of the pseudo card stolen brush, such as the combination of false card stolen brush is easy to occur before time, business category, unauthorized ongoing balance inquiry, around zero, fraud part of bank daily trading limit restrictions for unauthorized transaction monitoring rules set by the characteristics. When the transaction behavior, identity card and cardholders are found not to conform or high transaction should contact the cardholder to confirm authenticity, to confirm that the cardholder to authorize the transaction after I deal correct. Effectively raise Banks to prevent false card stolen brush ability of risk prevention and control. Magnetic stripe card renewal work done as soon as possible because the bank magnetic stripe card refers to magnetic materials for storage medium, such as bank account information recorded in the magnetic stripe CARDS, magnetic stripe card is easy to be copied to the bank money loss, therefore at present a lot of Banks have begun to bank card renewal work, with good safety performance of financial IC card instead of bank magnetic stripe card. In addition, improve the incentive mechanism construction of risk management, on the basis of regular and irregular in the risk assessment results, good for the risk assessment results, comprehensive risk management framework construction perfect mechanism, through the authorization for adjustment, performance ratings, priority support to start newbusiness delegation, adjustment factors of business innovation, management, can be appropriately in the human resources and cost allocation give policy tilt, can give points in performance appraisal review. For risk management body have made outstanding contributions or reduce loss of major risk events offer certain material and spiritual reward employees, and on the personal career advancement channels give sufficient consideration; For all kinds of risk management talents, external training, qualification certification, access to exchange offer certain aspects such as policy tilt, and on the personal career advancement channels will be given full consideration. For all kinds of risk management talents, external training, qualification certification, access to exchange offer certain aspects such as policy tilt, and on the personal career advancement channels will be given full consideration.译文商业银行信用卡风险管理研究Nicely E摘要商业银行信用卡业务风险管理广义上讲是指在商业银行信用卡业务经营中，因各种不利因素而导致的发卡机构、持卡人、特约商户等损失的可能性。

商业银行信贷风险管理外文文献翻译中文3000多字This article discusses the importance of credit risk management for commercial banks。

It highlights the us methods used by banks to manage credit risk。

including credit scoring。

credit limits。

loan loss ns。

and collateral requirements。

The article also examines the impact of regulatory requirements on credit risk management practices and the role of corporate governance in ensuring effective risk management。

Overall。

the article emphasizes the need for banks to adopt a comprehensive and proactive approach to credit risk management in order to maintain financial stability and avoid costly losses.In today's increasingly complex financial environment。

effective credit risk management is essential for the long-term success of commercial banks。

Banks face numerous challenges in managing credit risk。

商业银行风险管理中英文对照外文翻译文献(文档含英文原文和中文翻译)“RISK MANAGEMENT IN COMMERCIAL BANKS”(A CASE STUDY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS) - ABSTRACT ONLY1. PREAMBLE:1.1 Risk Management:The future of banking will undoubtedly rest on risk management dynamics. Only those banks that have efficient risk management system will survive in the market in the long run. The effective management of credit risk is a critical component of comprehensive risk management essential for long-term success of a banking institution. Credit risk is the oldest and biggest risk that bank, by virtue of its very nature of business, inherits. This has however, acquired a greater significance in the recent past for various reasons. Foremost among them is the wind of economic liberalization that is blowing across the globe. India is no exception to this swing towards market driven economy. Competition from within and outside the country has intensified. This has resulted in multiplicity of risks both in number and volume resulting in volatile markets. A precursor to successful management of credit risk is a clear understanding about risks involved in lending, quantifications of risks within each item of the portfolio and reaching a conclusion as to the likely composite credit risk profile of a bank.The corner stone of credit risk management is the establishment of a framework that defines corporate priorities, loan approval process, credit risk rating system, risk-adjusted pricing system, loan-review mechanism and comprehensive reporting system.1.2 Significance of the study:The fundamental business of lending has brought trouble to individual banks and entire banking system. It is, therefore, imperative that the banks are adequate systems for credit assessment of individual projects and evaluating risk associated therewith as well as the industry as a whole. Generally, Banks in India evaluate a proposal through the traditional tools of project financing, computing maximum permissible limits, assessing management capabilities and prescribing a ceiling for an industry exposure. As banks move in to a new high powered world of financial operations and trading, with new risks, the need is felt for more sophisticated and versatile instruments for risk assessment, monitoring and controlling risk exposures. It is, therefore, time that banks managements equip themselves fully to grapple with the demands of creating tools and systems capable of assessing, monitoring and controlling risk exposures in a more scientific manner.Credit Risk, that is, default by the borrower to repay lent money, remains the most important risk to manage till date. The predominance of credit risk is even reflected in the composition of economic capital, which banks are required to keep a side for protection against various risks. According to one estimate, Credit Risk takes about 70% and 30%remaining is shared between the other two primary risks, namely Market risk (change in the market price and operational risk i.e., failure of internal controls, etc.). Quality borrowers (Tier-I borrowers) were able to access the capital market directly without going through the debt route. Hence, the credit route is now more open to lesser mortals (Tier-II borrowers).With margin levels going down, banks are unable to absorb the level of loan losses. There has been very little effort to develop a method where risks could be identified and measured. Most of the banks have developed internal rating systems for their borrowers, but there hasbeen very little study to compare such ratings with the final asset classification and also to fine-tune the rating system. Also risks peculiar to each industry are not identified and evaluated openly. Data collection is regular driven. Data on industry-wise, region-wise lending, industry-wise rehabilitated loan, can provide an insight into the future course to be adopted.Better and effective strategic credit risk management process is a better way to Manage portfolio credit risk. The process provides a framework to ensure consistency between strategy and implementation that reduces potential volatility in earnings and maximize shareholders wealth. Beyond and over riding the specifics of risk modeling issues, the challenge is moving towards improved credit risk management lies in addressing banks’readiness and openness to accept change to a more transparent system, to rapidly metamorphosing markets, to more effective and efficient ways of operating and to meet market requirements and increased answerability to stake holders.There is a need for Strategic approach to Credit Risk Management (CRM) in Indian Commercial Banks, particularly in view of;(1) Higher NPAs level in comparison with global benchmark(2) RBI’ s stipulation about dividend distribution by the banks(3) Revised NPAs level and CAR norms(4) New Basel Capital Accord (Basel –II) revolutionAccording to the study conducted by ICRA Limited, the gross NPAs as a proportion of total advances for Indian Banks was 9.40 percent for financial year 2003 and 10.60 percent for financial year 20021. The value of the gross NPAs as ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was as low as 2.26 percent. Net NPAs as a proportion of net advances of Indian banks was 4.33 percent for financial year 2003 and 5.39 percent for financial year 2002. As against this, the value of net NPAs ratio for financial year 2003 for the global benchmark banks was 0.37 percent. Further, it was found that, the total advances of the banking sector to the commercial and agricultural sectors stood at Rs.8,00,000 crore. Of this, Rs.75,000 crore, or 9.40 percent of the total advances is bad and doubtful debt. The size of the NPAs portfolio in the Indian banking industry is close to Rs.1,00,000 crore which is around 6 percent of India’ s GDP2.The RBI has recently announced that the banks should not pay dividends at more than 33.33 percent of their net profit. It has further provided that the banks having NPA levels less than 3 percent and having Capital Adequacy Reserve Ratio (CARR) of more than 11 percent for the last two years will only be eligible to declare dividends without the permission from RBI3. This step is for strengthening the balance sheet of all the banks in the country. The banks should provide sufficient provisions from their profits so as to bring down the net NPAs level to 3 percent of their advances.NPAs are the primary indicators of credit risk. Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is another measure of credit risk. CAR is supposed to act as a buffer against credit loss, which isset at 9 percent under the RBI stipulation4. With a view to moving towards International best practices and to ensure greater transparency, it has been decided to adopt the ’ 90 days’ ‘ over due’ norm for identification of NPAs from the year ending March 31, 2004.The New Basel Capital Accord is scheduled to be implemented by the end of 2006. All the banking supervisors may have to join the Accord. Even the domestic banks in addition to internationally active banks may have to conform to the Accord principles in the coming decades. The RBI as the regulator of the Indian banking industry has shown keen interest in strengthening the system, and the individual banks have responded in good measure in orienting themselves towards global best practices.1.3 Credit Risk Management(CRM) dynamics:The world over, credit risk has proved to be the most critical of all risks faced by a banking institution. A study of bank failures in New England found that, of the 62 banks in existence before 1984, which failed from 1989 to 1992, in 58 cases it was observed that loans and advances were not being repaid in time 5 . This signifies the role of credit risk management and therefore it forms the basis of present research analysis.Researchers and risk management practitioners have constantly tried to improve on current techniques and in recent years, enormous strides have been made in the art and science of credit risk measurement and management6. Much of the progress in this field has resulted form the limitations of traditional approaches to credit risk management and with the current Bank for International Settlement’ (BIS) regulatory model. Even in banks which regularly fine-tune credit policies and streamline credit processes, it is a real challenge for credit risk managers to correctly identify pockets of risk concentration, quantify extent of risk carried, identify opportunities for diversification and balance the risk-return trade-off in their credit portfolio.The two distinct dimensions of credit risk management can readily be identified as preventive measures and curative measures. Preventive measures include risk assessment, risk measurement and risk pricing, early warning system to pick early signals of future defaults and better credit portfolio diversification. The curative measures, on the other hand, aim at minimizing post-sanction loan losses through such steps as securitization, derivative trading, risk sharing, legal enforcement etc. It is widely believed that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Therefore, the focus of the study is on preventive measures in tune with the norms prescribed by New Basel Capital Accord.The study also intends to throw some light on the two most significant developments impacting the fundamentals of credit risk management practices of banking industry – New Basel Capital Accord and Risk Based Supervision. Apart from highlighting the salient features of credit risk management prescriptions under New Basel Accord, attempts are made to codify the response of Indian banking professionals to various proposals under the accord. Similarly, RBI proposed Risk Based Supervision (RBS) is examined to capture its direction and implementation problems。

原文：Effective risk management in financial institutions Abstract：Risk management is more important in the financial sector than in other parts of the economy. But it is difficult. The basis of banking and similar financial institutions is taking risk in conditions of uncertainty. Describes how the Turnbull report, for which the author was project director, created a new underlying approach to risk. Provides a guide to the way in which the various Turnbull ideas have become the bedrock of risk management and suggests how they can be developed.There can be few, if any, parts of the economy in which risk management is more important than the financial sector. Financial institutions account for a sizeable number of the world’s leading companies and have a criti cal role to play in the economics of every country and thus in world economic order as a whole. Their whole business is centred on taking risks in conditions of uncertainty. The Turnbull Report on risk management and internal control, which is applicable to all listed companies in the UK and which has been widely disseminated internationally, fully recognises this fundamental point. Its focus is on effective risk management and not the elimination of risk. In a modern competitive market economy, business organisations that are risk averse are unlikely to earn satisfactory returns. On the other hand, highly volatile returns are unlikely to find favour with capital markets anxious not to be surprised, particularly by bad news. Moreover, Turnbull is as much about doing the right things and not missing strategic opportunities, as it is about doing things right, essential if a company is to achieve its full potential. Applying Turnbull’s approach may lead to some financial institutions realising that they are not taking enough risk; perhaps a new market can be identified and while there may be clear risks in being the first to enter there may equally be significant first-mover advantages to be gained.A framework, not a rule bookThe Turnbull Report also recognises the dynamic nature of markets in which an organisation operates and seeks to encourage companies to create risk managementsystems that can continually adapt to changing circumstances. To avoid particular controls being seen as an end in themselves even once their usefulness has ceased, the guidance places internal controls firmly in their broader business context: they are only of value to the extent that they help businesses to control the risks that threaten the achievement of their business objectives. In summary, Turnbull offers a framework, rather than a rulebook, which each organisation can apply to its own circumstances to develop an appropriate internal control system.The importance of sound judgementThe fact that Turnbull eschews a tick-box approach has been well received by the business community; however, it does mean that judgement plays a vital role in establishing an effective internal control system, starting at board level. Making sure that judgement is sound is perhaps the greatest single challenge involved in risk management. No system and no amount of internal controls will prevent losses if the judgement on which business decisions are based is poor.Judgement comes into play in initially establishing clearly defined business objectives, identifying the risks to achieving those objectives, prioritising how great a threat those risks pose and then determining appropriate responses in the form of developing internal control systems.Judgement is also called for in terms of applying cost-benefit analysis to the merits of adopting specific controls. It is clearly worthwhile for a bank to undertake credit checks before granting loans but a cost-benefit approach will promote systems that focus staff time on the potentially high risk loans and on developing early warning systems when loans are not performing rather than selecting a one size fits all approach.Identification issuesRisks that threaten a financial institution’s objectives will often range from highly function-specific risks through to strategic, big picture issues. Consider the foreign exchange trading activity in a major bank. There is clearly a risk that an individual trader, left to operate free of internal controls, can run up significant losses. This risk is located in a define d area of the bank’s activities but its potentialwide-ranging impact should not be underestimated. As Barings so visibly demonstrated, operational problems in a financial institution can be life-threatening probably to a greater extent than operational problems in many other businesses.At the other end of the spectrum lie a whole range of market-related strategic risks, for example, the threat that supermarkets will increasingly capitalise on their existing customer relationships to gain a larger share of the retail financial services market, or that closing down bank branches in rural locations will trigger accusations of a lack of social concern and damage the bank’s public image and possibly its brand value even though the decision may be financially supportable. With market concentration growing at national, regional and global levels, it is also essential in many cases not only to select the right strategic partner for growth but also to ensure relevant deals can be successfully concluded. Identifying the take-over candidate or strategic alliance partner is but the start of the process. Care needs to be taken to manage the risk associated with regulatory intervention and to avoid the emergence of a hostile bidder to an agreed deal. As a number of British financial institutions have discovered in recent years, the price in terms of continued independence of a high profile abortive deal can be high.Keep control of your reputationReputational risk is a major issue for the entire financial services sector, given the fundamental need for customers to believe in the stability and security of an organisation’s operations if they are to continue trusting it to handle their affairs. Furthermore, as the pensions mis-selling affair demonstrated there is a need for trust both in the individual institution and in the sector as a whole of which it forms part. This therefore calls on some occasions for collaborative as opposed to solely competitive risk management strategies as may also be the case in, for example, combating credit card fraud or on some IT security issues. In retail banking the reputation of individual banks could become much more of an issue in the years ahead with customers being increasingly tempted to consider the advantages of switching between high street banks, both as a result of the costs of switching being reduced and due to the influx of new market entrants. The recent questioning of the independenceof analysts’ forecasts will also need to be addressed robustly if long-term reputational repercussions are to be avoided.Assessing the importance of risksIdentifying the existence of potential risks does not necessarily mean that action is required to mitigate all of them. Risks must be prioritised, by means of assessing the likelihood of their occurring and the extent of their impact – high likelihood and high impact suggesting high priority for action.Verifying your judgementsWhen identifying and prioritising risks, financial institutions need to have regard to the concept of “verifiability”; in other words, if a different group of people were making the same decisions about the importance of those risks, would they be likely to come to the same conclusion? This is obviously more likely to be the case if a wide range of people from a broad cross-section of the business, both laterally and vertically, is involved in the risk identification and assessment process and if there are no “taboo” subjects which prevent conventional wisdom within the organisation being challenged when necessary.External views of risk must also be fed into the identification and assessment process. What is the market’s view of interest rate developments? How are personal investments expected to change in the coming years? In the case of regulated areas such as financial s ervices, the organisation’s perceived view of how its principal regulator views it will be of interest but also an assessment will be needed of how the overall regulatory environment is likely to develop, including in competition terms, and the impact of international developments such as those being brought about by the Lampfalussy report in the EU.Change managementOne of the key challenges running across the entire process of identifying and assessing risks is that the business and financial world is in a constant state of flux. How is the emergence of Internet banking changing the way that retail customers interact with their bank? How important is 24-hour access to account details? What does this mean for the maintenance of IT systems? Do people really want to be able tochange their bank details using their mobile phone? How do you manage call centres effectively to ensure that this new form of bank/customer interface maintains the bank’s brand values?Some new or changing market conditions will develop gradually over time, while others may sweep the market quickly. Given this dynamic background, the internal control framework must be regularly reviewed and adjusted to take account of changing market conditions. It is management’s role to recommend poli cies for managing risk, the board’s role to review and approve them, and management’s role once more to implement them and report back on their operation.Coping with risk in the midst of change is particularly key when an industry is going through a period of consolidation. Merger and acquisition activity brings inevitable disruption as previously distinct cultures and systems are consolidated into a new combined entity. The risk management implications of such proposals need to be carefully considered before, during and after the merger process.Embedding risksThe ability to respond to changing conditions largely relies on the internal control system being embedded in the bank’s operations. This is a complex process involving a range of activities including the effective communication of, and reporting on, the bank’s risk management policies at all levels, the development of risk training courses, the involvement of staff in responding to early warning systems, channels for reporting suspected control breaches and generally the creation of a positive risk management culture.The process of embedding risks should not, however, be allowed to lead to complacency or passivity within the organisation. The fact that systems are in place, a control manual exists and staff have been trained in risk management as part of their daily activities does not mean that systems are infallible as they will always be dependent, at least to some extent, on the people operating them and, for example, when staff morale is low more mistakes, accidentally or deliberately, are likely to occur.Cultural challengesCulture is also key in terms of creating an environment where dealing losses and real or suspected control breaches can and will be reported. If the prevailing culture is one of blame without just cause, then there is a high chance that individuals will see it as in their own self-interest to try to cover up problems. Many organisations are also now developing “whistleblowing” procedures to ensure concerns can be reported confidentially.Remuneration issuesThe bank’s remuneration policies have an important role in reinforcing or undermining the internal control environment. Take the bonuses paid out at the end of each year. The factors determining the size of the payout are likely, indeed intended, to shape employees’ behaviour. Consider the trader who has had a bad patch and whose bonus is under threat. He/she might react by taking increasingly greater risks in the attempt to reach his/her target. Alternatively, he/she might lose interest in his/her performance until the start of the next bonus period. Either way, the bank’s overall performance could be affected by his/her actions. However, if the bonus is based on long-term performance, then he/she is far more likely to maintain an optimal effort level over the longer term.Management, not eliminationThe Turnbull approach emphasises risk management, not risk elimination. Financial institutions must take risk, but they must do so consciously. Establishing the appropriate cultural framework needs the support of all staff in the process of identifying, monitoring and controlling risks. Risk management must be seen as an ongoing and valued activity with the board setting the example. It is without doubt a challenging agenda.Source: Anthony Carey, 2001.“Effective risk management in financial institutions”. Journal of Risk Finance. February.pp.24-27.译文：在金融机构的有效风险管理摘要：风险管理在金融部门中比经济的其他部分更重要。

商业银行信贷风险管理外文文献翻译中文3000多字文献出处：Ayeni R K, Oke M O. The commercial bank credit risk management [J]. Australian journal of business and management research, 2022, 12(2): 31-38. 原文The commercial bank credit risk managementAyeni R K, Oke M OAbstractCommercial Banks is an important part of the financial sector, deposit and loan business, not only bear the financing function, and the burden of the payment and settlement and so on many functions. In commercial Banks and credit losses from is influenced by many factors existing in life risk or uncertainty, this is commercial bank's risk.According to the reasons of the risk analysis, it is generally believed risk of commercial bank credit risk, interest rate risk, exchange rate risk, liquidity risk, operational risk or operational risk, legal risk, country risk, etc. Among them, the credit risk is the main risk faced by commercial Banks. General credit risk refers to the risk for each customer default triggered; Narrow sense of credit risk is to point to a bank can not recover the loan principal and interest on schedule uncertainty, namely, Banks in the credit expected return can't realize the possibility of life. American commercial Banks due to historical reasons and institutional reasons, non-performing loan ratio is generally on the high side, asset quality problem is very serious, therefore, the credit risk is Vietnam the biggest risk facing the commercial Banks. Key words: Commercial Banks; Credit risk; Risk management 1 Literature review Commercial bank risk management experiences from the head of the traditional analysis, financial ratio analysis, statistical method is applied to the model of quantitative risk management now has gone througha long history of more than 300 years, the credit risk management, risk identification and analysis, resist the strategy of the risk, risk monitoring and early warning method has formed the one whole set to complete. Now more science, system, perfecting the credit risk of awakes risk rating system is concentrated in the western developed countries, in the bank's riskmanagement practices in these countries on the basis of summarizing and refining of the new Basel capital accord has become a national bank regulatory reference standards.Developed in the 1950 s the modern financial theory is the theoretical basis of commercial bank credit risk management. Mainly includes: notes, black and Schultz’s portfolio management theory of option pricing theory, Steger Ritz information asymmetry theory proposed by and comply with the birth and development of financial derivatives in the 1970 s and put forward the theory of Vary (value at risk), etc.Until the 1970 s, the measurement of credit risk relies mainly on the various financial statements provide the static data and macroeconomic indicators on the credit of the wind relative competent or qualitative analysis. As it is the cult of the \c\Since the 1980 s, because of the impact of the global debt crisis, the international banking is begun to pay attention to the prevention and management of credit risk. The Basel accords in 1988, and put forward the credit risk of the ownership management way, on this basis, the banking industry to form the traditional quantitative analysis of credit risk management method. Mainly includes: credit scoring method and neural network analysis method.Since the 1990 s, due to declining profits and off-balance-sheet business commercial bank loans risk increasing, prompting Banks to adopt a more economic method to measure and control the credit risk, and thedevelopment of modern financial theory of credit tool innovation, to carry out the new credit risk measurement model. Compared with the traditional credit risk management methods, the modern credit risk quantitative model based on modern finance theory on the basis of the analysis of the risk and pricing, the introduction of mathematical statistics, system Ding Cheng, even science research methods, such as physics, the bank faces a variety of risk identification, measurement, method of adjusting and monitoring of a series of procedures. These models and methods has become the current banking institutions in risk and miscellaneous, competitive on the market for survival and development of theimportant means to protect.At present, the world's most popular four kinds of modern Credit Risk measurement model is respectively. Morgan bank development based on the borrowing enterprise registration transfer Credit Metrics model, developed by Moody’s KMV model based on borrowing enterprise equity changes, Credit Suisse fop in actuarial science principle of the development of Credit Risk model, and McKinsey & company development based on macroeconomic variables affect corporate default probability of Credit Portfolio View model.2 Customers of commercial bank credit policy choice in the United States Choice of credit customers is a very rigorous process. American commercial Banks attaches great importance to industry analysis, one is to set up the independent team research industry and industry, they can track comprehensive industry fundamentals, according to the overall economic development trend and the main enterprise in the industry's performance judgment, to decide to enter or exit, and continuous tracking study; The second is in the process of research work in the business management for institutional arrangements. The commercial Banks in the process of asset management has three levels, namely investment policycommittee, the research team and a portfolio manager. Asset management department study the researchers responsible for recommendation has investment value of listed companies of 77 companies, after consultation with traders submit a special committee to choose around 50 kinds of stocks to buy and sell. This arrangement is also suitable for loan management. Banks have a batch of CFA, engaged in the industry market analysis, industry analysis and capital to help raise the level of scientific decision and risk prevention. Investment banking industry research team and credit business industry research team are independent of each other, independent judgment; three is detailed research field and research content. Commercial Banks sort of clients by industry in the United States, each type of customer segmentation again for key customers and developing customers and keep customers. FANNIE MAE is equipped with a special housing price research department, responsible for different zip code area real estate price trend in the future. Banks in general has also established industry, industry andcustomer information system, make sure there are accurate, reliable and continuous research information; Four is a set of mature methods. American commercial Banks asset management division formed in more than 200 years of investment philosophy emphasizes the following aspects: panoramic investment, emphasis on the investment value of the impact of economic, social and political environment widely evaluated, thematic analysis judgment, carefully assess the specific industry, department of industry and the affected factors and possible results, to choose investment industries and enterprises. The thorough study on the proposed investment company, predict stock price change trend; Strict process, evaluate the intrinsic value of the target price to buy and sell products. American commercial Banks by risk management team is responsible for assessing risk and growth industry. In terms of risk analysis, must be from a globalperspective analysis of various factors affecting industrial risk: industry maturity, cycle, profitability, industry impact dependency, substitute products and regulatory environment. By refining industry door the risk analysis and evaluation of the industry, different risk weighting of each industry is equal to the Banks in the industry department internal exposure to various fields, and using the weighted average method to calculate the industry department's risk rating, and 30 sectors according to the risk rank.In trade credit policy, the commercial bank system was studied for the big industry. Science and technology industry, the real estate industry, metals and mining, the media industry, industrial, health care, government and agency services, logging and packaging industry, automotive and transportation industry, the financial services industry, energy industry, electronic industry, national defense and aerospace, banking, consumer and retail industry, building materials, chemical industry, capital and other 18 industries in residential construction. American commercial Banks to industry has formed a characteristic service, special commitment, management and service advantage to accumulate. At the same time, in order to develop small and medium-sized enterprise market, the industry segment also carried on the thorough research, identified the credit policy of the industry, including waste disposal, home care, life help equipment, hotels, motels, building contractors, convenience stores, gasstations, government suppliers, hospitals, real estate investors, professional real estate developers, housing developers, lay pavilion, food sales, bar dry cleaners, auto repair tools, used car dealers, car dealers, entertainment, sports venues, amusement park, bowling alley, cinema), etc.American commercial Banks also stipulates the lending industry is prohibited.3 American commercial Banks credit risk management measuresAmerican legal principle limit creditors by controlling the enterprise to realize its own interests, creditors can only be acquired according to various enterprises credit loan decision-making, management and financial information beforehand and monitoring, and after the event when an enterprise is difficult to timely payments to resort to legal solution. Therefore, the fact relations more based on short-term trading. Because it could not according to the relationship with the enterprise long-term for more information, Banks have more power through the analysis of the borrowing enterprise deals of default information (with all the Banks' trading), the condition of market value data and financial risk. By means of perfect social credit system and the developed capital market, the commercial Banks can use more accurate and timely customer credit information and market data for risk analysis, so as to avoid the traditional rely on qualitative analysis methods of risk analysis. Large American commercial Banks usually establish the credit risk management system, and use modern risk measurement method to calculate the degree of risk. On the basis of calculating various kinds of risk assets, the United States commercial Banks emphasize on portfolio risk assessment and measurement. Credit risk measurement of single focus is to ensure that each loan risk can be effectively controlled, and the focus of the portfolio risk management is to ensure that the portfolio risk and return matches the optimal scheme. Loan portfolio management is the core of through quota management, avoid loan risk concentration, efforts in the region, products, industry, industry and individual credit scale to achieve diversification, prevent excessive inputs of a field. Not only that, the commercial bank assets in recent years also reflects the diversity of obvious characteristics, credit bank credit assetsproportion to drop, rising proportion of money market and capital market other products.。

金融市场的风险管理(英文版)Risk Management in Financial MarketsIntroductionRisk management is a crucial aspect of the financial markets. It involves the identification, assessment, and mitigation of potential risks that may impact an organization's financial well-being. The dynamic nature of financial markets makes effective risk management imperative to ensure stability and sustainability. This article aims to explore the various aspects of risk management in financial markets.Types of RisksFinancial markets face various types of risks, each with its unique characteristics. The most common types of risks in financial markets include credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and systemic risk.Credit risk refers to the potential loss arising from a borrower's inability to repay a loan or meet its contractual obligations. Financial institutions employ credit risk management techniques, such as credit scoring models and credit derivatives, to assess and mitigate this risk.Market risk encompasses the potential loss due to fluctuating market prices of financial instruments. It includes risks associated with interest rates, currencies, equities, commodities, and derivatives. Market risk management involves using techniques like portfolio diversification, hedging, and stress testing to mitigate potential losses.Liquidity risk arises when an institution is unable to fulfill its financial obligations due to an insufficient availability of liquid assets. Effective liquidity risk management involves maintaining adequate liquidity buffers, developing contingency funding plans, and regularly monitoring and stress testing liquidity positions.Operational risk involves the risk of financial loss due to inadequate or failed internal processes, systems, or human error. It includes risks associated with technology failures, fraud, legal and regulatory compliance, and vendor management. Operational risk management involves implementing robust internal controls, conducting regular audits, and training staff on risk awareness.Systemic risk refers to the risk of widespread disruptions or failures in the financial system that could have a significant impact on the overall economy. It can arise from interconnectedness and interdependencies among financial institutions, such as in the case of a financial crisis. Systemic risk management involves regulatory oversight, stress testing, and contingency planning at both the institutional and systemic levels.Risk Assessment and MitigationEffective risk management starts with a thorough and comprehensive risk assessment. This involves identifying and analyzing risks, including their potential impacts and likelihoods of occurrence. Risk assessment enables organizations to prioritize risks and allocate resources accordingly.Once risks are identified, appropriate risk mitigation strategies canbe implemented. These strategies may include risk avoidance, risk reduction, risk transfer, or risk acceptance. Risk avoidance involves refraining from activities that pose significant risks. Risk reduction involves implementing measures to minimize the likelihood or impact of risks. Risk transfer involves transferring risks to another party, such as through insurance or hedging. Risk acceptance involves acknowledging and accepting certain risks if their potential impact is deemed acceptable.Risk management frameworks and tools can also assist in the overall risk management process. These frameworks provide a structured approach to managing risks and can help organizations establish appropriate risk management policies, procedures, and controls. Examples of risk management tools include risk registers, risk appetite statements, risk and control self-assessment, and key risk indicators.Continual Monitoring and ReviewRisk management is an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring and review. Financial institutions need to establish effective risk monitoring systems to detect and assess emerging risks promptly. Regular risk reporting and analysis help organizations stay informed about their risk profiles and take necessary actions.Risk management frameworks should also be periodically reviewed and updated to ensure their effectiveness in addressing evolving risks. As technology advances and market conditions change, risk management practices need to keep pace to effectively manage emerging risks.ConclusionRisk management is a critical component of the financial markets. The proper identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks are essential for maintaining stability and sustainability. By implementing robust risk management practices, financial institutions can navigate the challenges and uncertainties of financial markets effectively. Continued commitment to risk management ensures the soundness and integrity of the overall financial system.Sure, here's some additional content on the topic:Risk measurement and monitoring are key aspects of risk management in financial markets. Organizations use various metrics and tools to quantify and monitor risks. These include value-at-risk (VaR), stress testing, scenario analysis, and sensitivity analysis. VaR measures the potential loss in a portfolio or position under normal market conditions, with a specified confidence level. Stress testing, on the other hand, involves assessing the impact of extreme and hypothetical market scenarios on a portfolio's value. Scenario analysis involves analyzing the potential outcomes of specific events or market conditions. Sensitivity analysis assesses how changes in underlying factors, such as interest rates or exchange rates, affect the value of a portfolio.Risk management practices also extend to regulatory compliance. Financial institutions need to comply with various regulations and guidelines set by regulatory authorities. These regulations aim to safeguard the stability and integrity of the financial system and protect consumers. Risk management frameworks helporganizations ensure compliance by providing guidelines on risk assessment, reporting, and governance. Regulatory frameworks, such as Basel III, require banks to maintain adequate capital buffers to absorb potential losses and to have robust risk management systems in place.Technology plays a significant role in modern risk management. Advanced analytics tools and algorithms enable organizations to better analyze and understand risks. Artificial intelligence and machine learning can identify patterns and detect anomalies that may indicate potential risks. Risk management systems can also be automated to facilitate real-time monitoring and reporting. Technology-driven risk management helps organizations to improve risk assessment accuracy, increase efficiency, and enable faster decision-making.In addition to external risks, organizations also need to consider internal risks. Internal risks can arise from poor governance, inadequate internal controls, or unethical behaviors. Risk management frameworks often include internal control systems to ensure the effective mitigation of internal risks. These systems involve procedures and policies that promote transparency, accountability, and ethical behavior within the organization. Regular internal audits help assess the effectiveness of internal controls and identify areas for improvement.Risk management is a collective effort that involves all stakeholders in the financial markets. Regulators, financial institutions, investors, and market participants all play a role in identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks. Effective riskmanagement requires collaboration and information sharing among these stakeholders. Regulatory authorities set standards and guidelines, financial institutions implement risk management practices, investors conduct due diligence, and market participants adhere to market rules and regulations.In conclusion, risk management in financial markets is vital to ensure stability, sustainability, and trust in the financial system. It involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating various types of risks, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and systemic risk. Risk assessment and mitigation strategies are informed by robust risk management frameworks and tools. Continual monitoring and review of risks help organizations stay informed and responsive to emerging risks. Technology and regulatory compliance also play significant roles in effective risk management. By prioritizing risk management, financial institutions can safeguard their financial well-being and contribute to the overall stability of the financial system.。

译文商业银行信贷风险管理研究在我国商业银行的业务中，资产通常包括贷款、证券投资、现金存款以及其他四种类型的资产，比如贸易，在这些资产中，信用贷款业务是一种业务，是我国商业银行的主要的业务种类，在商业银行的所有业务中，信用贷款占据了信用资产中很大一部分比例。

在西方商业银行中，信用资产通常占据40%到50%，而在我们国家，商业银行的这一比例要更高一些，大约在50%到50%。

信用风险是银行的主要的操作风险之一，也是银行管理过程中最主要的一个挑战，因此，银行对于信用风险的管理，通过设立特殊的机构去处理，采取多种手段来解决，但是，因为银行贷款业务中的大部分信用风险是多种多样的贷款业务，是最主要的资产，所以在信用管理方面，商业银行的贷款业务是相当宽松的，而且，其他的管理也是不平衡的，这是由于贷款企业无形资产的过度集中增加了银行的信用风险。

因此，加强信用资产的风险管理对于商业银行的发展也是非常重要的。

首先，对当前商业银行的信贷风险环境进行分析。

（1）过时的信贷风险识别和度量技术我们国家的商业银行的发展历程更短一些，数据样本相对较小，不能够有效提取信息和原因，潜在的数据库需要长期的积累才会更加完善，在短期内不能形成一个完全的客户信息系统。

而且，我国商业银行大体上并没有对建立信用数据库产生足够的重视，再加上一系列管理的的方法口径不一致，以及数据库的不一致。

在一些已经建立的信用数据库中，一些数据的真实性和完整性值得怀疑，这些问题直接影响商业银行的信贷风险的客观和公正的评价。

与此同时，我国商业银行的信贷风险管理的方法和技术仍不完善，国外已经采用许多先进的信贷风险管理工具，尤其是信贷风险评估和信贷风险防范技术等等。

（2）信贷风险处理手段较少信贷风险管理是指将信贷风险降低到最小的一个过程，信贷风险是客观存在的，这意味着银行是一定会承担一定的信用风险的。

在我国，信贷风险控制和处理机制是相当弱的，方法手段很单一，仅仅抵押贷款有着第三方的保证，而且信贷资产的证券化和其他信贷风险的控制方法并没有被有效的使用，信贷资产的全面管理没有真正的落实。

外文原文Tolerance of the Credit Risks ofCommercial BankCommercial bank main model and method including tradition credit risks, credit of management measure method and based on V AR modern credit risks measure model. Among them, traditional credit risks measure method include expert system camphor tree law , credit point system and neural network model, and based on V AR modern credit risks measure model include KMV model , surtax model , model of Credit-Metrics and credit risks of CSFP.Expert system model law before one year, financial institution is it analyze or determine the nature analytical method not to weigh credit risks, enterprise of loan subjectively to rely on mainly, this kind of method is called the expert system models. Such as classical " 6C law " - By the morality about expert's foundation debtor (character), ability (capacity), capital (capital), pledge (collateral ) , management environment (condition ) and continuity (Continuity ) of undertaking six factor evaluate creditworthiness and comprehensive refund ability their, determine whether to grant the loan finally or not. Whether classical credit is it stores some defects in to analyze, mainly showing in the following aspects. ①Risk that the human factor brings. ②Following the serious bureaucratic style of work.Credit point system to reflect debtor economic situation or influence debtor several indexes (such as the financial rate of the borrowing enterprise), credit of state entrust to certain weight, receive and reflect credit the dividing value or the value of probability in breach synthetically of the credit state through some specific methods, and is it is it pay loan grant and loan fixed price to determine to come compared with basic value it. Whether Z value model propose by Altman, adopt five financial indexes (5 financial index these on 1968. Xl =Net working capital / total assets, X2 =Retain the incomes / total assets, X3 =EBIT / total assets, X4 =Benefit market value / the book value of the debt, X5 =The income from sales / total assets) calculate the weighting, implement credit to mark to the borrowing enterprise, compare total points with critical value, distinguish the bankrupt company and not go bankrupt in the company, will not grant the loan to the bankrupt enterprise. 1977, Altman, Hardeman, Mahayana is it set up categorized accuracy higher ZETA model to expand to go on to primitive Z value model. 1995, as to private company, Altman revise to Z value model,counting by Z' value model. At present, the main defect of this kind of model is lacking the essential historical record material.The neural network model roughly imitates the thought process of human brain and artificial intelligence system of the learning method. Neural algorithm of network whether one group input, carry on mathematics is it produce through transfer function one export to change and then. Foreign Altman and Vrettos, Coats and Fans, etc all try to use this law, receive certain result. Someone uses such methods as the neural network, etc. to carry on the appraisal of risk of credit to the commercial bank too in our country. But neural model heavy shortcoming that their randomness of working is relatively strong most, and need to debug artificially. Consume a large amount of manpower and time.The nerve network model imitates the person's artificial intelligence system of the brain thinking process and the study method mostly. The calculate way of the nerve network is an importation, and then pass to convert the function to carry on mathematics conversion to produce an exportation of. Altman and Vrettos, Coates and Fans etc.excesses of the abroad all tried to make use of this method, being subjected to the certain result. Someone applies also the nerve network etc. the method carries on the credit risk evaluation to the commercial bank. However, the biggest weakness of the nerve model is the random that it works stronger, and need the artificial to adjust to try. Waste a great deal of manpower and times.The Model of the KMV is the estimate to the borrow funds the business enterprise default all rate of method. First, it makes use of the Black- Stoles three option list price formula, the according to motion of the market value, the property value of the business enterprise property, expire time, the calm insurance to borrow interest rate and owe debt faces to be worth to estimate a market value of business enterprise ownership of a share and it undulates sex, compute a default implement( the Default Exercise Point, for business enterprise a year following the value of short- term obligation plus don't long- term obligation of pure face the value of half) of company according to the liabilities of the company again, then the calculation borrow funds the person's default distance, the end is apart from to break contract the rate( EDF) its with expectation according to default of the business enterprise of beg an expectation default rate of business enterprise towards should relate to.The model of Credit-Metdcs was credit risk that J · P root develops in 1997 tocalculate model. It is an establishment on the usefulness foundation of reputation rating system of. The usefulness of reputation rating system means that investment in enterprise failure, profits descend, margin outlet dried up etc. Reputation affairs appear towards fulfill contract influence of ability can in time and fittingly through variety body of its reputation grade. Because of the occurrence of reputation affairs, will produce influence to reputation grade of business enterprise, the market value of its reputation tool also takes place homologous variety by all means. That model is an angle that combined from the property, not angle of the one property to treat the credit risk. It passes to contrast the combination to contribute (the average limit risk contribute= augmentative risk of combination because of increase one some reputation tool, the market of reputation's tool value) in the limit risk of each reputation tool, the reputation grade of a reputation tool, expose degree with related coefficient and its risks of other properties etc. end turn basis for the quantity that the letter loan of investor makes policy to provide science.The CSFP credit risk affixture calculates the Credit-Metrics dissimilarity that the model and conduct and actions stare at the city model( MTM), it is a break contract model( DM), it is not the rise and fall of the reputation rating and change with this related reputation excess fare to see as a part of V AR( credit risk) for lend money, but see do only is the market risk, it at any period consider to break contract and don't break contract these two kinds of affairs appearances only, loss that calculate to expect and did not expect, but be unlike in the Credit- Metrics value that generous character expect and the value variety that did not expect. In the CSFP credit risk affixture calculate model, break contract all the rate is no longer long-lost, but was certainly change in to have by the model all the rate distribute of change quantity continuously. The Each loan was see to do small all the rate breaks contract the affairs, and the default of each loan all rates are all independent the in other loans, thus, the lending money the combination the default all the rate distributes to near the loosen to distribute.CSFP credit risk affixture calculates the model consideration break contract all the different from lose indetermination of the size, calculate all rate and lose the size and can get ally of indetermination of the rate the segment distributes lose, adding to all losses of segment of total for lend money the combination of loss distribute.Above-mentioned three differentiations of the models can induce for six aspects of the following: First, definition aspect in the risk, the model of Credit-Metricsbelongs to the model of MTM; The CSFP credit risk affixture calculates the model to belong to the model of DM; And model of KMV since can be consider as the model of MTM, also can be consider as the model of DM.Second, drive the factor aspect in the risk, in model of KMV and Credit Metrics, the risk drives the factor is business enterprise property value and it undulates sex; But in the CSFP credit risk affixture calculate model, the risk of key drives factor is a variable default rate to all be worth in the economy. Third, the motion aspect in the reputation affairs, in the Credit Metrics, break contract all the rate was change into by the model according to the history data of fixed, or long-lost value; But different from CSFP credit risk affixture calculate in the model, default all rate is variable, but obedience in the model of KMV all the rate distribute. Fourth, relativity aspect in reputation affairs, each model has different relativity structure, the model of KMV and Credit Metrics are to change quantity more positive; But the CSFP credit risk affixture calculate the model to suppose or break contract relativity of the rate with expectation independently. Fifth, at recovery rate aspect, in the simple form of the model of KMV, recovery rate is a constant; In the CSFP credit the risk affixture calculate model, losing serious degree was gather together integral combines demarcation as different segment of recovery rate is the constant in the segment of; In the latest version of the model of KMV, recovery rate is random; In Credit Metrics and be willing to the tin model, the recovery rate also is random. Sixth, aspects of calculating the method, Credit Metrics to individual loan or loan the combination adoption analyzes the method to carry on calculate, combining to then adopt Monte Carlo to the large-scale loan emulation technique carries on calculate; the model of KMV and CSFP credit risk affixtures calculate the model adoption analysis method to carry on calculate.Ever since that time in 1996, the Basel agreement ruled to use for assurance that an internal model of capital of the risk misted be to take Vary as the basal model, the Vary became most popular risk to manage the model currently. Not only can carry on quantity's turn to the credit risk of debtor of the one, more important can carry on measure to concentrated risk of debtor of whole line and reputation of its related communities, but also can press profession, term, category...etc. to carry on quantity to turn measurement decomposition risk source according to the Vary credit risk generous character model. The risk degree that can contribute to manager to control trade and invest in time and accurately thus. In addition, the traditional credit risk of bank analysis mainly pays attention to loss that the obligation faces to make underdefault condition, but neglected loss that the debtor reputation natural intelligence the dynamic state variety cause, but thought and operations of the model have to certainly draw lessons from the meaning towards improving the commercial bank credit risk manage.中文译文西方商业银行信用风险的度量商业银行信用管理的主要模型和方法包括传统的信用风险度量方法和基于V AR的现代信用风险度量模型。

文献出处：Cornett M, Strahan P. The credit risk management of commercial banks [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 101(2): 297-312.原文The credit risk management of commercial banksCornett M, Strahan PAbstractCredit risk is one of the most usual ones which any commercial banks may encounter during their operation. Credit risks of commercial banks not only cause losses which result in bankruptcy but also cause the most serious issues of financial and economic crisis of one nation. Referring to credit risk management of Vietnam commercial bank system，the capability of credit risks management of Vietnam commercial banks is still low; The rate of bad debt in the entire system is still much higher than international standards. Take this situation in consideration together with referring to a great number of documentations, I have studied credit risk managementof the three typical commercial bank in Vietnam and analyzed and evaluated the remaining issues in the process of credit risk control by these banks and offer some relevant solutions to the entire system of domestic banks. In credit risk management, I shall focus mainly on unscientific features in econometrics methods of credit risk management issued by commercial banks in Vietnam，which is inclusive of combination of unclear mathematic method and class analysis one to calculate credit risks. Due to the fact that credit risk management after disbursement by most of commercial banks is still weak, it is quite needed to study management after disbursement, particularize the method of identifying credit asset debt, build five-class classification, carry out actual management of credit asset and base on tendency of bad debt to offer solutions for every time period. In conclusion, what motioned herein comes from credit risk management in consideration of prevention, calculation, change and solution as well as risk management institutions.Key words: Risk, credit risk, commercial bank credit.1 Commercial bank credit risk management theoryAlthough Banks have a long history, but the theoretical analysis of credit risk is a relatively short history. By kea ton (Keeton, 1979), stag Ritz and Weiss (Mr. Weiss, 1981) development and formation of the "incomplete information credit rationing models on the market", it is pointed out that the credit market credit risk not only the two typical forms of...Adverse selection and moral hazard, and demonstrates the root of the credit risk, information asymmetry caused by the principal-agent relationship, lead to the emergence of credit rationing. Credit risk management refers to the commercial Banks through the scientific method of various subjective factors could lead to credit losses effectively forecast, analysis, prevention, control and processing. In order to reduce the credit risk, reduce the credit losses and improve the quality of credit, to enhance the capacity of the commercial bank risk control and loss compensation ability of a credit management activity. Depth understanding of credit risk management from the following four to grasp. One is the basis of credit risk management is according to the characteristics of credit requirements, not against the objective law of credit; The second is the credit risk management is scientific, modernization, standardization, quantitative and comprehensive; Three is the credit risk management method is mainly credit risk analysis, risk identification, risk measurement, risk control and risk management; Four is the credit risk management goal is to reduce risk, reduce loss, enhance the ability of commercial Banks operating risk.In order to guarantee bank loans will not be against its customers, to customers, companies, enterprises, such as different customer types before they are allowed to make loans to consider some problems. Also the question bank standard of 5 cabaña will select credit analysis of 5 c as a measure of the basic elements of corporate credit risk:1.1 QualityThe debtor to meet its debt obligations will, is the first indicator of evaluate the credit quality of the debtor. Regarding the quality of the wholesale banking, measure, or can be based on the reputation of the company management/owner eventually and company strategy.1.2 AbilityThe debtor's solvency, include the trend of the vision of the industry, the sustainable development of the company; the financial data mainly embodied in the current ratio and quick ratio. The stability of the corporate cash income directly determines its solvency and probability of default.1.3 CapitalRefers to the capital structure of the debtor or quotas, which indicates that the background of the customer may repay debt, such as debt ratio) or the net value of fixed assets and other financial indicators, etc.Shadow of the company's capital structure financing strategy: equity financing and debt financing.1.4 EnvironmentCompany locates the environment and the adaptability to the environment. Including solvent could affect the debtor's political, economic and market environment, such as the dong to rise and cancel the export tax rebate. As the "green credit, supported by more and more countries and companies, sustainable risk also be incorporated into the environmental risk considerations.1.5 MortgageRepayment of the debt of other potential resources and the resources provided by the additional security. Refuse or insolvent debtor can be used as mortgage/collateral assets, for no credit record (such as trading for the first time) or credit record disputed the debtor2 The commercial bank credit risk management processIn order to effective credit risk management, commercial Banks should grasp the basic application of credit risk management. In general, the credit risk management process can be divided into credit credit risk identification, risk estimate and credit risk handling three phases:2.1 Credit risk identificationCredit risk identification is before in all kinds of credit risk, the risk types and to determine the cause of occurrence of a risk, analysis, in order to achieve the credit risk measurement and processing. Credit risk identification is a qualitative analysis of the risk, is the first step of credit risk management, which is the basis for the rest of the credit risk management. Customer rating system and credit risk classification of the two dimensional rating system is constitute the important content of risk identification. This chapter will make detailed description of the two parts. Before the credit investigation is the commercial bank credit risk identification is the most basic steps, bank loans to the customer before must know the borrowing needs of the clients and purpose. Credit investigation before the concrete has the following contents: understand the purpose of credit, credit purpose including: type, in line with the needs of the business purpose and credit product mix and match the borrower repayment source of credit and credit term and effective mortgage guarantee/warranty or other intangible support.2.2 Credit risk estimateCredit risk estimation is the possibility of Banks in credit risk and the fact that the risk to evaluate the extent of the losses caused by measurement. Its basic requirements: it is estimated that some expected risk the possibility of credit; 2 it is to measure some credit risk fact may cause the loss of the scale. Objective that is both a difficult problem, but such as is not an appraisal, can't the quantitative corresponding countermeasures to prevent and eliminate. With the development of risk management techniques, in the financial markets open, Vietnam's financial regulators and commercial Banks also pay more and more attention to the risk of quantitative, in credit rating and have a certain progress in capital adequacy.Before Banks to make loans to customers, Banks must also understand the purpose of the customer, more understand the usage of loan customers, whether it is feasible, from now on, find a way to manage future loans to avoid the violation of the customer. As a result, Banks should use the loan examination and approval way to deal with.2.3 The processing of credit riskCredit risk after processing is that the Banks in the recognition and valuation risk, the effective measures taken by different for different size of loan risk take different processing method, make the credit risk is reduced to the lowest degree. Risk treatment methods mainly include: risk transfer refers to the bank assumes the credit risk on to others in some way. Transfer way, it is transferred to the customer, such as Banks to raise interest rates, require the borrower to provide mortgage, pledge or other additional conditions, etc.; 2 it is transferred to the insurance company, the bank will those particularly risky, once happened will loss serious loans directly to the insurance company insured, or by the customer to the insurance company insured to transfer risk;3 Commercial bank credit risk management regulation.In the risk management of commercial Banks to improve themselves at the same time, regulators and external credit rating agencies to the commercial bank credit risk management has a different regulation method.3.1 The China banking regulatory commission five classificationsThe CBRC requires commercial Banks asset quality for five categories, to reflect the face possible credit losses. System is classifying loans into five categories according to the inherent risk level could be divided into normal commercial loans, concern, loss of secondary, suspicious, five categories.The China banking regulatory commission five classifications has the advantage that the bank asset quality can be compared more easily, also can take credit quality ofthe whole global. Disadvantage is that some small and medium-sized Banks because of the lack of independent audit and internal audit, classification standard is difficult to unity, the China banking regulatory commission five classifications often find selective examination questions.3.2 Stress tests, a rating agencyRating agencies will be according to the information disclosure and audit results and adjusting the bank's credit rating. Stress test is a credit rating agency for checking the quality of commercial bank credit and common ways of anti-risk ability. Because of the influence of the stress tests, for what has happened, to predict the result may worsen the credit quality; Or for the possibility of events, predict the results of the impact of credit quality. Similar stress tests include, an industry is a strong shock cases the possibility of default, or large credit customer default could lead to credit quality decline.3.3 The new Basel capital accordNew Basel capital agreement hereinafter referred to as the new Basel agreement (hereinafter referred to as Basel II) in English, is by the bank for international settlements under the Basel committee on banking supervision (BCBS), and content for 1988 years the old Basel capital accord (Basel I) have had to make significant changes, in order to standardize the international risk management system, improve the international financial services of risk management ability.译文商业银行信贷风险管理作者：Cornett M, Strahan P摘要信贷风险是商业银行经营过程中所面临的最主要的风险之一。