解读萨基短篇小说《非法闯入》的多重象征意象
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:316.80 KB
- 文档页数:4
象征手法在文学作品中的运用象征手法在《白鲸》中的应用一.裴考德号,全体船员与海洋的象征意义《白鲸》描写的是一艘名叫裴考德号的捕鲸船在船长亚哈的带领下追击白鲸的故事从表面上看,全书的焦点似乎集中在船长亚哈和白鲸莫比&迪克之间不共戴天的仇恨上,但实际上它不仅仅是一部曲折离奇的探险小说。
小说中裴考德号全体船员向白鲸一步步的逼近以及他们的最终灭亡,象征着人类在社会”自然以至宇宙中的命运作者正是通过象征主义来表达他对人类命运的忧患意识的显然,裴考德号及全体船员的悲惨下场是从一开始就已经注定了的。
首先,这艘船的名字本身就象征着灭亡裴考德是美国印第安人一个种族的名字,在美国被白人殖民者占领以后,许多本土的印第安人部落和种族在和白人殖民者的冲突中被消灭了。
裴考德就是一个已经被白人消灭了的种族赫尔曼&麦尔维尔用这个名字来命名捕鲸船,象征着它必定灭亡的悲惨下场其次,因为全书的叙述者伊什梅尔是这艘遇难船上的唯一生还者,他的叙述只是将业已酿成的灾难复述一遍而已正如伊什梅尔所说的,船员们做着一切努力,千辛万苦地穿过那无垠的大海,只是为了奔赴他们的死期他们天涯海角地跟踪追逐,只是在搜索那条最终会毁灭他们的东西作者安排唯一的幸存者来讲述这个故事,预示了裴考德号和全体船员的悲惨下场。
在《白鲸》中,裴考德号航船是来自陆地的力量,海洋则代表着自然,他们之间的对立比较也具有明显的象征意义:航船裴考德代表的陆地是有限的,但是相对海洋来说它是安逸舒适的;而海洋是无边无际变幻莫测的,它象征着凶险同时水是生命之源,因此海洋在这里也代表着深奥难测的命运。
船与海代表着人类所必须面对的生活,象征着必须要面对人生途中的凶险,人们才能获得对生活的充分理解陆地的封闭自足需要打破,到海洋上冒险求知,遵循自然规律,人们才能把握命运只有在精神上,在理智上冲出有限的疆界,人们才能获得新知;但是同时,出海冒险又剥夺了人生的安乐在作品中,麦尔维尔不惜点穿事物的象征意义,让读者不得不面对小说的深层寓意#:海洋与陆地有什么区别吗?为什么前者的奇迹必能给后者带来好运呢?当难以想象的恐怖降临到希伯莱人身上的时候,可拉一伙人脚下富有魔力的地面就张开大嘴,把他们给永远吞噬了;那富有生命的海洋天天都以同样的方式把船只和水手给吞没了。
1.卡夫卡的《变形记》是怎样表现人的现代社会的异化的?2.表现主义的思想倾向是什么?3.卡夫卡小说突出艺术特色是什么?4、《喧哗与骚动》所设计的班吉什么事有何意义?5、简述《尤利西斯》三个部分的主要情节内容?6.简述《尤利西斯》为什么被说成是意识流的集大成者?7、存在主义文学中经常出现的主题有哪些?举例说明。
8、如何理解萨特小说《恶心》中对“恶心”的感受?9、《魔鬼与上帝》表现了萨特本人怎样的思想变化?10、《局外人》的评理表达的是什么?11、新小说派的“革命性”表现在哪里?12、为什么说有两个罗伯格里耶,一个是客观主义者,一个主页主义者?13、米歇尔〃布托尔的创作《变》运用第二人称“你”有何作用?14、魔幻现实主义小说的基本手法是什么?15、如何理解魔幻现实主义小学中“现实”与“魔幻”的关系?16、简述“黑色幽默”产生的社会历史和文化心理根源?17、举例说明黑色幽默小说家经常运用哪些文学手法?18、马赛尔姆《白雪公主》的内容与格林同名童话有何不同?19、第二十二军规有什么象征意义?20、与传统小说相比,后现代主义的元小说有何不同?21、如何评价博尔赫斯小说学的贡献?22、为什么说卡尔维诺的小说《我们的祖先》有鲜明的童话和寓言特征?23、卡尔维诺的《塞冬夜行人》写作上有何特点?24、简谈《老人与海》中“狮子”的象征意象?25、《日瓦戈医生》在小说艺术史上的独特贡献是什么?26、索尔〃贝娄的《赫索格》主人公是个怎样的形象?27、索尔〃贝娄的长篇小说《洪堡的礼物》赞扬了什么精神?28、索尔〃贝娄在小说语言艺术风格上怎样?29、简述前期象征主义诗歌发展情况?30、后期象征主义情况如何?31、什么是“象征”?简述后期象征主义诗歌的特点?32、说明《荒原》的特点?33、庞德在意象主义运动中起了怎样的作用?34、希尔达〃杜利托尔的创作简况?35、《海伦在埃及》的内容与艺术有何革新?36、超现实主义文学有何特点?37.简要说明布勒东对现实主义诗歌的贡献?38.简述聂鲁达诗歌创作有何进步性?39. 简要说明女性主义思潮的宗旨和特点。
解读环境设置在小说中的艺术魅力------评萨基的短篇小说《闯入者》摘要:《闯入者》是英国著名短篇小说家萨基的代表作之一。
萨基的短篇小说结构严谨,构思巧妙,结尾经常出人意料,常常被人拿来与欧•亨利和多罗茜帕克作比较。
他擅长从英国上层社会和中产阶级生活中的简单无聊的日常琐事中取材,以机智、幽默、辛辣的笔调,以小见大,通过不落俗套的艺术构思,跌宕起伏的故事情节,出人意料的结局,和机智幽默的语言表现出不同凡响的艺术效果。
该小说中的环境设置具有明显的象征主义色彩。
本文通过对《闯入者》中具有浓厚象征色彩的背景设置,如故事发生的地理环境、历史时期,物理环境,背景转换及环境的讽刺意义等进行分析,揭示其背景设置在塑造人物形象及揭示小说深刻的哲理内涵和艺术韵味中所起的重要作用。
关键词:萨基《闯入者》环境设置象征讽刺Hector Hugh Munro, better known by the pen name Saki was known as one of British best short-story writer, whose extraordinarily compact, wicked and witty short stories satirized Edwardian society and culture. Actually, the name "Saki" was borrowed from the cupbearer in Omar Khayyam's The Rubaiyat. Munro used it for political sketches contributed to the Westminster Gazette as early as 1896, later collected as Alice in Westminster. The stories and novels were published between that time and the outbreak of World War I, when he enlisted as a soldier. He died of wounds from a sniper's bullet while in a shell hole near Beaumont-Hamel. His short story is very popular among English readers, while in China, there is little study papers about Saki and his works. Although his short-story The Open Windows is very familiar for Chinese readers, but the name of Saki seems didn’t earn its due reputation. Nevertheless, his position in the English literature is impregnable as long as the sun shines. His short story, characterized by ingenious conception, rigorous structure, acrimonious tone and pungent satire contribute to his reputation as the master of short story in Europe. On the other hand, he was more than often compared with two famous American short story writers O·Henry and Dorothy Parker because of their similarities in the unpredictable endings of their short stories. He was influenced by Oscar Wilde, Lewis Carroll, and Kipling, and himself influenced A. A. Milne, Noël Coward, and P.G. Wodehouse.The Interlopers, Written during WWI and published in 1969 after his death, is a short story based on two men, Georg Znaeym and Ulrich von Gradwitz, whose families have fought over a forest in the eastern Karpathian Mountains for three generations. Ulrich's family legally owns the land, but Georg – feeling it rightfully belongs to him –hunts there anyway. One windy and snowy winter night, both Georg Znaeym and Ulrich von Gradwitz Ulrich, harbored bitter hatred, are hunting on the woodland over which they have disputed for more than three generations. Actually, both of them expect to meet the enemy and kill each other like a “game”--”as boys they had thirsted for one another’s blood, as men each other prayed that misfortune might fall on the other”. In that very moment that they want to take action, as an "act of God", a beechtree branch suddenly falls on each of them, trapping them both under a log. Gradually, they realize the futility of their quarrel and become friends to end the family feud. They call out for their men’s assistance, and after a brief period, Ulrich makes out eight or nine figures approaching over a hill. The story ends with Ulrich’s realization that the "interlopers" on the hill are actually wolves.The novel intelligently employs a series of symbolic settings, including geographical location, historical period, and physical environment to convey the theme of the story and through intelligent and ingenious setting shift to depict the characteristics of the characters and to imply the development of the plot. Particularly, at the end of the story, the irony in settings unveils the profound philosophical implications, which makes the story more thought provoking.As we all know, the setting of a short story is not simply the time and place in which it occurs. Elements of setting may include physical environment, geographical locations, culture background, historical period, and situational environment. Along with the plot, character, theme, and style, setting is considered one of the fundamental components of fiction. Careful description of these aspects of setting helps the reader gain a greater sense of the story and can connect to the story's central theme and greatly enhance the author's purpose. In many stories that we read, settings are not stated directly. The writer expects us to find clues and make inferences about where and when the story takes place and to find the underlying relations with the theme of the short story. Saki ‘use of setting is arguably the most effective element in The Interlopers. 1. Geographical LocationThe geographical location of The Interlopers is “the eastern spurs of the Karpathian Mountains”. Actually, Saki purposely trumps up "Karpathian” according to "Carpathian" as the place in which the story occurs for two reasons. Primarily, he intends to satirize the First World War .The Carpathian Mountains are a range of mountains forming an arc roughly 1,500 km long across Central and Eastern Europe, making them the second-longest mountain range in Europe .They provide the habitat for the largest European populations of brown bears, wolves, chamois and lynxes, with the highest concentration in Romania. As well as over one third of all European plant species. It is the epitome of the dark days when imperialists barbarously and ferociously carve up the world through violence. The story is written when Saki was serving on a warship in France. Therefore, the two main characters of the story -- Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym -- symbolizes the imperialists in the First World War mercilessly plundering the colonies and fighting because they did not split up the profit from obey equally. And the Karpathian is a symbol of the marauded colonies. As a result, Saki ingeniously employs the variation of Carpathian to satirize the First World War. Secondly, the author chooses Karpathian as the settings to fuzzify and globalize the story. If the time and space of the story is certain and specific, it is rather difficultfor the readers to connect the plot of the story with their own life and the sense of value. Therefore, Saki purposely use Karpathian rather than Carpathian specific place in the real world, as the setting the story taken place, because he wants to remind the readers that the story of The Interloper may occur around us at any time. In the sense, the readers can find the Karpathian around them which makes the plot of the story globalized and universalized.2. Historical PeriodAccording to the story and our knowledge about the author, we can imply that the history period of the story is during The Edwardian era which is a period of time covering the reign of King Edward VII, 1901 to 1910, and is sometimes extended beyond Edward's death to include years leading up to World War I. The era was marked by significant shifts in economy and politics of the society that had been largely excluded from wielding power in the past, such changes included rising interest in socialism, attention to the plight of the poor, and the status of women, including the issue of women's suffrage, together with increased economic opportunities as a result of rapid industrialization. However, the poor were still frowned upon and segregated and the government in this era was very strict with their laws. Many people believed that if they owned something, for example, land, that no one else should use that land without the owner's permission. In this way, it is not difficult for us to understand the basic conflict between the characters in the story.Also, the woodland can be seen as the source of conflict. In The Interlopers, for three generations, the family of Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym, driven by the frenzied hatred, have been disputed over a useless woodland .while just as Ulrich acknowledged that “it was not remarkable for the game it harbored or shooting it afforded, but it was the most jealously guarded of all its owner’s territorial possessions”, both of them regard each other as the “interlopers”. It indicates that any forms of conflict and hatred itself is pointless and even stupid, and it makes no difference to the matter when the reconciliation is only reached the day before the disaster indeed come down. In a sense, it also can be seen as the conflict origins of the First Word War. As we all know, the spark of the First World War is the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, in Sarajevo on 28 June 1914. Ferdinand's death at the hands of the Black Hand, a Serbian nationalist secret society, set in train a mindlessly mechanical series of events that culminated in the world's first global war. If the youth can express his political opinion by other means, the First World War wouldn’t break out in an instant, and numerous innocent people wouldn’t have been involved in the dreadful and brutal war. Saki intends to tell us that the origin of any conflict itself may of no pragmatically significance to both party involved, instead, it is the inconsequential sparkle, flamed by vanity, absurdness, selfishness and jealousy, that eventually leads to the loss of millions of lives..3.Physical EnvironmentThe author presents a vivid picture of the physical environment of story through his meticulous and detailed description. The Interlopers takes place in a "dark forest," a "narrow strip of precipitous woodland that lay on its outskirt" which, ironically, is a waste land that of no real uses to both of them but is the source of their dispute and continuing feud. As with many short stories, no specific time is mentioned, but we do know that the author lived from 1870 to 1916 and that in the story night --- “awind-scourged winter night”---"the whistling and skirling of the wind and the restless beating of the branches for sight and sound of the marauders"--“little snow had fallen as yet”--is approaching. The bad weather and desolated environment adds additional mood and complications for the characters in The Interlopers. It also arouses the curiosity of the readers’ speculation to the destiny of the characters in the novel. The author uses plenty of subtle touches depicted a vivid picture of the physical environment, which is ingeniously in line with the development of the plot. In the story, it is a "wind-scourged winter night" that causes "unrest among the creatures that were wont to sleep through the dark hours." The "disturbing element in the forest" pushes Ulrich to wish "if only on this wild night, in this dark, lone spot, he might come across Georg Znaeym, man to man, with none to witness." The wildness of the winter wind accentuates the wildness felt by the character. Therefore, the characteristics of the protagonists in the story gradually emerge and become more obvious and distinct."Relief at being alive and exasperation at his captive plight brought a strange medley of pious thank-offerings and sharp curses to Ulrich’s lips."Are they your men?’he repeated impatiently as Ulrich did not answer.""Each had a rifle in his hand; each had hate in his heart, and murder uppermost in his mind.""’I don’t drink wine with an enemy.’"“So you’re not killed as you ought to be, but you’re caught, anyway,” he cried; “caught fast.”“Let's shout for help,” he said; “in this lull our voices may carry a little way.” “They won't carry far through the trees and undergrowth,” said Georg, “but we can try. Together then.”From these sentences we can see that Ulrich von Gradwitz is a stubborn, selfish man at first, but with further development in the story he becomes more open-minded. He is the one who is willing to becoming friends with Georg, his worst enemy. On the other hand, Georg Znaeym is hardheaded and self-centered like Ulrich. He is jealousof Ulrich because he has abundant land and hunting grounds. Eventually he becomes open to being friends with Ulrich.4. Setting ShiftAlthough the overall setting for The Interlopers remains the same, it shifts in the sense that it becomes more narrowed and focused. "A deed of Nature's own violence overwhelmed them both. A fierce shriek of the storm had been answered by a splitting crash over their heads, and ere they could leap aside a mass of falling beech tree had thundered down on them, “pinning both characters to the ground. The setting then reflects the characters' own relationship: "All around them lay a thick-strewn wreckage of splintered branches and broken twigs." The characters' immobility illustrates a more immediate setting as they lay side by side, nearly able to touch each other.5. Irony in SettingThe final use of setting in The Interlopers occurs shortly after Znaeym and Gradwitz become pinned by the fallen tree. After hailing curses down on each other, the two eventually realize that their feud over a useless bit of wild land is pointless. The cold, desolate, unfriendly, isolated winter weather has actually brought the two men closer together. The final irony is that in this wild setting, there are naturally wild creatures, and after finally ending their feud, Znaeym and Gradwitz were about to finally end this long quarrel between the two families and become friends instead, they got confronted by wolves, signifying that their lives ended on the night they decided to make peace with each other. This reminds me of the many times that I have had to work together with other people only at a moment when our fate hangs in the balance like they are going through right now. However, at that time, it cannot make any difference to rewrite our destiny. However, there is also another kind of irony at the end of the story, because it was revealed to us that the two men’s fate were determined not by their men as they thought would be, but instead on a bunch of interlopers, the wolves. This is an ironic event since there were two mentions of “no interlopers” in the dialogue between the two men, once when they were still enemies and once when they became friends, but in the end it was “the interlopers” who came first and supposedly ended their lives. At the beginning, Znaeym and Gradwitz are confident about their capability to control nature, for them, nature is only a plaything. However, it is exactly nature that overwhelms and destroys them.Reference:1.Saki, a life of Hector Hugh Munro: with six short stories never before collected. Hamish Hamilton, 19812. Saki, the Best of Saki, Penguin Books Limited (UK), 19943. H. P. Abbott, the Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2007.4. Yuan Xianjun, Approaching Fiction, Peking University Press, 2004.5. Yu jianhua, Short Story in English: A reading Course. Beijing Higher Education, 2010.6. Sandie Byrne. The unbearable Saki: the work of H.H Munro: Oxford: O xford University Press, 2007.7. James Joll, Gordon Martel, the Origins of the First World War, Pearson Longman, 2007.。
解读萨基的短篇小说《非法闯入》的多重象征意象
李利红;尹雅莉
【期刊名称】《西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
【年(卷),期】2012(000)001
【摘要】《非法闯入》是英国当代著名短篇小说大师萨基的代表作之一。
该小说具有明显的象征主义色彩。
本文通过对《非法闯入》中具有浓厚象征色彩的林地、倾倒的山毛榉、狼群和“闯入者”等这些个体象征物所呈现出的多重意象的分析,揭示了该小说深刻的哲理内涵和艺术韵味。
小说中多重象征所揭示的多重矛盾所蕴含的启示对个体的人的成长和全人类的发展均有深刻的现实意义。
【总页数】4页(P57-60)
【作者】李利红;尹雅莉
【作者单位】淮阴工学院外语学院,江苏淮安223003;淮阴工学院外语学院,江苏淮安223003
【正文语种】中文
【中图分类】I106.4
【相关文献】
1.解读萨基短篇小说《非法闯入》的多重象征意象 [J], 李利红
2.The Dream of an Hour:自由与生命的较量及其启示——从多重叙述的角度解读凯特·肖邦著名短篇小说《一小时的梦想》 [J], 傅冰玲
3.初燃、熄灭和复燃——艾丽丝·门罗短篇小说《游离基》的生命意蕴解读 [J], 支婷婷
4.白先勇短篇小说中的象征意象——以花为例 [J], 鲁媛媛
5.短篇小说《从奥米勒斯城出走的人》多重象征意义解读 [J], 许悦萌
因版权原因,仅展示原文概要,查看原文内容请购买。
2019-2020学年重庆大同实验学校高三语文期中考试试卷及参考答案一、现代文阅读(36分)(一)现代文阅读I(9分)阅读下面的文字,完成下面小题。
演说家[俄]契诃夫早上,八等文官基里尔˙伊凡诺维奇˙瓦维洛诺夫下葬。
在送殡行列离开教堂前往墓地的时候,死者的同事,一位姓波普拉夫斯基的人,去找他的朋友格里戈里˙彼得罗维奇˙扎波伊金。
这个扎波伊金,具有一种罕见的才能,他擅长在婚礼上,葬礼上,各种各样的周年纪念会上发表即席演说。
“我呀,朋友,找你来了!”波普拉夫斯基正碰到他在家,说快穿上衣报,跟我走。
我们有个同事死了,这会儿正打发他去另一个世界,要是死个把小人物,我们也不会来麻烦你,可这人是秘书——某种意义上说,是办公厅的台柱子。
给这么一个大人物举行葬礼,没人致辞是不行的。
”“啊,秘书!”扎波伊金打了个哈欠,“是那个酒鬼吧?”“没错,就是那个酒鬼。
这回有煎饼招待,还有各色冷盘……你还会领到一笔车马费。
走吧,亲爱的!到了那边的墓地,你就天花乱坠地吹他一通,到时我们就千恩万谢啦。
”扎波伊金欣然同意。
“我知道你们那个秘书,”他说着坐上出租马车,“诡计多端,老奸巨猾,但愿他升天,这种人可少见。
”“得了,骂死人可不妥啊。
”“那当然。
对死者要么三缄其口,要么大唱赞歌,不过他毕竟是个骗子。
”为死者做了安魂祈祷,等大家安静下来,扎波伊金朝前跨出一步,向众人扫了一眼,开口了:“能相信我们的眼睛和听觉吗?这棺木,这些热泪涟涟的脸,这些呻吟和号哭,岂不是一场噩梦?唉,这不是梦,视觉也没有欺骗我们!眼前躺着的这个人,不久前我们还看到他是如此精力充沛,像个年轻人一样活泼而纯洁,这个人不久前还在我们眼前辛勤工作,像一只不知疲倦的蜜蜂,把自己酿的蜜送进国家福利这一总的蜂房里。
如今却已变成一堆骸骨,化作物质的幻影。
不可弥补的损失啊!现在有谁能为我们取代他呢?好的文官我们这里有很多,然而普罗科菲˙奥西波维奇却是绝无仅有的!他直到灵魂深处都忠于他神圣的职责,他不吝惜自己的精力,通宵达旦地工作,他无私,不收受贿赂。
2020届厦门湖滨中学高三语文下学期期中试卷及答案解析一、现代文阅读(36分)(一)现代文阅读I(9分)阅读下面文字,完成下面小题。
小狗皮埃罗【法】莫泊桑寡妇乐斐佛太太是一名乡绅太太,她和仆人洛斯,住在乡下一所不大的房子里。
一天夜里,有人偷走了她们园子里的十二棵洋葱。
想到盗贼可能还会再来,她们决定养一条狗。
但乐斐佛太太声明,她绝不会花钱去买。
一天早上,面包店老板带来了一只“小怪兽”:全身黄毛,四条腿短得跟没有似的,身子像鳄鱼,脑袋如狐狸,尾巴长似身子。
它名叫“皮埃罗”,惨遭主人遗弃。
一个子儿不花,太太立刻觉得这条小脏狗挺好看的。
刚喂一次,乐斐佛太太嘀咕:“等它在家待熟了,就可以放出去随便跑。
它在附近转悠,总能找到吃的。
”小狗果然放出去了,可是它仍旧免不了饥饿。
日子一长,乐斐佛太太逐渐习惯了,甚至有点喜欢这小狗了,还亲手喂它几口蘸了菜汤的面包。
然而,她根本就没有想到养狗还要交税,收税员登门向她要八法郎:“八法郎,夫人!”她一听,大叫一声,差点昏过去。
就这么一条小破狗,要交这么多钱!她当即决定,把皮埃罗送人。
可谁也不要。
万般无奈,只好决定让它去“啃石头”。
所谓“啃石头”,就是“吃泥灰岩”。
旷野上的泥灰石井有二十来米深,要给田地施加泥灰石时,才有人下井挖掘。
平时,这种矿井只是充当遗弃狗的坟场。
一条狗扔下去,先依靠那些先到者的遗体做食物,眼看就要饿死,忽然又扔下来一条狗,饥饿催促它们为生存而搏击,最后,强者把弱者活活吃掉……让皮埃罗去“啃石头”,就得物色一个执行人。
有个护路工人跑这趟要半个法郎辛苦费。
乐斐佛太太认为这是漫天要价。
洛斯于是提议由她们亲自送去。
这天傍晚,特意给皮埃罗烧了一盒香肠,还加了一点黄油。
皮埃罗大口吃下去,舔得一滴不剩。
趁它正满意地摇着尾巴,洛斯一把抓住,将它裹在围裙里。
她们大步流星,不大工夫,就到了坑口,俯身听了听,矿井下没有狗。
皮埃罗下去也只有它一条。
这时,洛斯流下眼泪,抱着吻了吻它,然后就往洞里一扔。
[莫泊桑普法战争作品浅析]“隐藏”的艺术"隐藏"的艺术--莫泊桑普法战争作品浅析引言莫泊桑,世界著名的短篇小说作家。
他继承了福楼拜、巴尔扎克、斯汤达等现实主义大师的写实传统,同时又追随左拉等自然主义先驱人物○1,在不到十年的时间里,创作了三百多篇脍炙人口的短篇小说,其中数十篇成为流芳百世的传世之作,被世人誉为"世界短篇小说之王"。
莫泊桑用传神之笔刻画了法国上下各阶层的人物,有的人物虽然象素描一样只淡淡几笔,但人物活生生的性格、丰富的神态已跃然纸上。
这些人物,有的令人同情,有的令人痛恨,有的令人无奈,有的令人啼笑皆非这些作品寄托了作者深厚的思想感情,每一个人物都凝结着作者的心血,寄托着作者的渴望。
莫泊桑正视现实、尊重历史,对于法国政府的软弱,他曾经说过这样一段话"如果我是当局,就像所有那些对如何拯救法国抱有种种想法的人一样,我知道该怎么做。
我会把所有的殖民地塞内加尔、加蓬、突尼斯、圭亚那、瓜特罗普、交趾支那、刚果、东京湾和其他地方,装进一只手提箱中,而且我会找到俾斯麦先生。
我将对他说先生,您在寻找殖民地,这里有一批存货,有一大堆,有一整套。
有各种各样,形形色色的。
居民有阿拉伯人、黑人、印第安人、中国人、安南人等等。
我要求以每一块殖民地换一公里阿尔萨斯和一公里洛林的土地。
如果德国首相同意,我就做了一笔好买卖?;○2莫泊桑用巧妙的讽刺手法,既抨击了当局的对外政策,又指出了法德两国对殖民地的掠夺,痛切点出了法国政府的腐败无能,一直在普法战争中割让国土的惨痛现实。
莫泊桑从小就生活在一个良好的文学氛围中,他的舅舅和母亲都是文学的爱好者。
他们在他很小的时候,就请求当时的文学大师--《包法利夫人》的创作者福楼拜,能够收下莫泊桑作为自己的学生。
于是,在福楼拜的悉心引领下,年轻的莫泊桑叩开了文学这座殿堂的神圣之。
19世纪俄国文学中闯入者形象的谱系研究文 / 赵惠惠摘要:文学中的“闯入者”指“闯入”某个空间群落从而颠覆或更新其间的生活、思维和行动模式的一类典型形象。
闯入行为既是闯入者对外在环境的突破,也是对内在自我的探索,更是对人生命题的解答。
“闯入者”形象贯穿着以塑造典型形象见长的整个19世纪俄国文学,且随着文化的裂变和社会转型经历了从“无望地破坏”到“探索人生”、由“实体英雄”到“复活”的演变过程。
闯入者形象的谱系化使“闯入”成为俄国文学的一种经典叙事结构。
关键词:俄国文学;闯入者;形象;谱系中图分类号:I512.074 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1005-9652(2017)04-0174-03闯入者是文学中的一类典型形象,其身份可以是知识分子、农民、巫师、魔鬼等,其主要的审美结构是“‘闯入’某个空间群落,使生活常态发生天翻地覆的变化”[1]。
“闯入者”形象贯穿着以塑造典型形象见长的整个19世纪俄国文学,格里鲍耶陀夫在其喜剧《聪明误》中对恰茨基形象的塑造不仅是一次奠基式的尝试,更是一次里程碑式的开拓。
作家将闯入者和作为“俄罗斯文学最显著的群体肖像”[2]的知识分子形象有机地融合在一起,开创了“知识分子闯入者”形象的先河,同时规定了该形象的审美使命,即通过“闯入”的形式为俄国知识分子所独有的气质和他们所肩负的使命提供一个展示的舞台,并借助“闯入”引发连锁反应的机制管中窥豹式地折射整个俄国社会政治、文化和思想的变迁。
19世纪的俄国风云变幻,“这是一个思考和语言的世纪, 同时也是一个尖锐分裂的世纪”[3]3。
社会的转型和文化的异变导致知识分子闯入者们经历了“无望地破坏”、“探索人生”、“积极地生活”直至“复活”的成长过程。
闯入者形象的谱系化使“闯入”成为俄国文学的一种经典叙事结构。
一、初代闯入者:无望的破坏者19世纪初,俄罗斯传统宗教文化遭遇西方现代文明的冲击,社会转型和文化裂变引发了作为社会先进阶层的知识分子的思想危机,苦闷、自我放逐、摒弃传统乃至极端的个人主义成为这一时期知识分子的生存常态,也成为初代知识分子“闯入者”的典型气质。
阿瑟-阿达莫夫《侵犯》主要内容简介及赏析(最新版)编制人:__________________审核人:__________________审批人:__________________编制单位:__________________编制时间:____年____月____日序言下载提示:该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的,希望大家下载后,能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改,请根据实际需要进行调整和使用,谢谢!并且,本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文,如诗歌散文、原文赏析、读书笔记、经典名著、古典文学、网络文学、经典语录、童话故事、心得体会、其他范文等等,想了解不同范文格式和写法,敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor.I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as poetry and prose, original text appreciation, reading notes, classic works, classical literature, online literature, classic quotations, fairy tales, experience, other sample essays, etc. if you want to know the difference Please pay attention to the format and writing of the sample essay!阿瑟-阿达莫夫《侵犯》主要内容简介及赏析【导语】:作者介绍阿瑟阿达莫夫(Arthur Adamov 19081970)法国剧作家,荒诞派戏剧奠基人之一。
《外国小说欣赏》知识梳理,高考小说技巧都在这里!展开全文《外国小说欣赏》知识梳理!第一单元话题:叙述1.叙事角度(1)全知视角:往往用第三人称来叙事。
叙事人相当于上帝,他对情节的发展,人物的心理、命运了如指掌,甚至走到前台对人物评头论足。
好处:①便于作者对人物、情节的掌控;②便于作者对人物进行评判,使作者的倾向鲜明地展示在读者面前。
(2)有限视角:往往用第一人称来叙事。
依靠人物的眼睛来看小说中的世界。
好处:给读者留下想象空间,让读者去推理、评判。
2.叙述人称(1)第一人称:使小说显得亲切,拉近作品和读者的距离,便于抒发感情。
(2)第三人称:以旁观者身份来讲述故事,叙述相对自由。
(3)第二人称:拉近叙述者与人物之间的距离,抒情气息浓。
1.《桥边的老人》海明威(1)主题:通过描写老人在逃难路上对家中动物的挂念,揭示战争的罪恶,呼唤人性与爱的回归。
(2)艺术特色:A.以小见大B.叙述简约,含蓄深远(3)作者:海明威,美国小说家。
1954年因中篇小说《老人与海》获得诺贝尔文学奖。
美国“迷惘的一代”的代表作家。
塑造了以桑提亚哥为代表的“可以把他消灭,但就是打不败他”的“硬汉性格”。
在艺术上,他提出了著名的“冰山理论”。
他的代表作还有长篇小说《太阳照样升起》《永别了,武器》和《丧钟为谁而鸣》等。
2.《墙上的斑点》伍尔芙(1)主题:通过描写主人公对斑点的六次猜想,表现作者对生命的神秘与不可控制、对自由的向往、对男权的否定等等思想感情。
(2)艺术特色A.辐射状结构B.自由联想(3)作者:弗吉尼亚·伍尔芙,英国女作家,批评家,意识流小说的代表人物之一。
《墙上的斑点》是她第一篇典型的意识流作品。
第二单元话题:场景1.场景:小说是由一个个场景构成的。
它是以人物为中心的环境描写。
(人物+事件+环境)2.场景:公共场景和私人场景3.场景的功能(1)给全篇“定调”(2)营造意境与渲染气氛(3)导引人物出场(4)揭示人物性格(5)作为象征4.风景的意义(参考初中知识:景物描写的作用)(1)营造氛围,渲染气氛。
《闯入者》的现实主义分析王小帅第12部作品《闯入者》入围第39届多伦多电影节和第71届威尼斯电影节,其依据荣格的“集体无意识”观点推出肉体之外的“潜意识”,试图用心理现实主义的方式,摆正现实与梦境的差别,以此展开心灵救赎。
《闯入者》较好的把迷茫文青气、“老三线”生活和现实社会问题结合,以冷峻的姿态从人物内心出发,使用戏剧化手法,探析虚实幻灭的“闯入者”。
一、戏剧情境铺陈——“空间”韵味影视艺术除去镜头语言的表达,核心部分需戏剧性叙事来搭建传奇故事,所有故事脉络都应围绕戏剧情境来铺设。
“戏剧情境是促动戏剧性冲突爆发、发展的契机,是使人物产生特有动作的条件。
”1同时,戏剧情境“包含了两方面内容:特定情况、环境和特定的人物关系。
”2导演采用小景别的交代方式,外加空间范围的局限(即老邓一家所在生活社区、学校、养老院、公车),以凸显主人公狭隘、阴郁生活的日复一日。
同时,老旧的居民区和现代化居民楼、公交车和现代轿车、家庭和养老院、北京和老三线,形成四组完全对立的空间环境,试图对多种不同的生活方式展开探讨,进而推出时代更迭的后遗症,如此起主导作用的还是大社会背景对人心的导向。
纵观影片中的环境,渗透着萨特禁闭剧的影子。
当电话铃声响起,电话那头只有喘息声从无人应答,进而促使老邓一家处于被动的猜测状态,随影视时空流转,接电话者张军和邓美娟的往昔罪过都通过对话表现在观者面前。
大军接后,推测是因工地纠葛,想到自己没给工人钱的事件。
而老邓开始疑神疑鬼的推测是自己死去的老头子,终感知是一份关于老赵多年前罪责的讨债,老太太强悍的内心在无人作答的电话前坍塌,对老赵一家的忏悔成为影片表现的重要情节。
能够说此类外在情况和环境的铺设,对影片情节的搭建具有直接促动作用。
戏剧情境书写中还有更值得推敲的环节,即故事的人物关系设定,这也是故事讲述的基石。
回看具有王小帅标签的影片不难发现,人物关系谱表现去复杂化,《闯入者》也延续简单人物关系原则。
意识与潜意识的世界――萨洛特小说《陌生人肖像》解读发表时间:2008-11-14T11:31:23.530Z 来源:《新学术论坛》供稿作者:黄芳[导读] 内容摘要:法国新小说派作家娜塔丽·萨洛特的代表作《陌生人肖像》是一部心理探幽小说,作者通过对一对父女心理活动的探寻,企图发掘人与人之间最敏感的感应关系。
内容摘要:法国新小说派作家娜塔丽·萨洛特的代表作《陌生人肖像》是一部心理探幽小说,作者通过对一对父女心理活动的探寻,企图发掘人与人之间最敏感的感应关系。
本文通过《陌生人肖像》的解毒,试图揭示“肖像”下所隐含的深层象征意义。
关键词:主题隐喻潜意识法国二十世纪杰出的女作家娜塔丽·萨洛特是新小说派的创始人。
她创作的小说往往独具特色,故事扑朔迷离,人物形象模糊不清,让人如坠五里雾中。
她的代表作《陌生人肖像》用大量的对话和潜对话来表现人的真实的内心世界,是一部心理探幽小说。
读者的视角随着不名身份的“我”去窥视一对父女的活动和心理。
本文将对小说《陌生人肖像》进行逐层解析,以期得出作者的写作意图和小说的主题。
一娜塔丽·萨洛特的这部小说标题《陌生人肖像》看似简单。
若不读小说内容,读者会猜测该小说写的是一个叙述者对一个他所不认识的人的大致印象,或者描述的是一幅画,由画而发生了一段叙述者和与画相关的人的故事。
然而通读一遍小说后,读者却大吃一惊,内容完全不是他预想的那样:没有任何故事;完全是一部心理小说。
陌生人肖像在文中仅被提及两次,占据很短的篇幅,整部小说看似与肖像没有任何关系。
这部小说也不是在叙述一个动人的故事,没有曲折跌宕的情节。
那么作者的写作意图究竟是什么呢?“我”这个人无名无姓,也没有任何关于“我”的肖像描绘或身世的介绍。
“我”就象一个影子一样跟踪他人,想闯入他人的内心世界。
小说看至一半,还不见有关陌生人肖像的只言片语,也看不出和陌生人肖像有任何关系。
作者在整部小说中对陌生人肖像只是淡淡带过,然后又继续写“我”的窥视过程。
《烏瞰圖》的恐怖意识研究烏瞰圖是俄国小说家高尔基所著的一篇恐怖小说,它描述了一个幽暗的房间中出现了可怕的形象,令人心惊胆颤。
这篇论文将探讨烏瞰圖这个恐怖形象对人类恐惧心理的影响和作用,通过对小说情节和文本进行分析和解读,探索其恐怖意识的内在构成和基本特征。
以下是本论文的主要提纲:一、烏瞰圖的出现:情节分析和文本引证1. 烏瞰圖的出现时机和形式2. 小说人物对烏瞰圖的反应和描述3. 烏瞰圖的特征和形象描绘二、烏瞰圖的象征意义:文化符号和历史背景1. 烏瞰圖在俄罗斯文化中的地位和意义2. 烏瞰圖与民间传说和神话相关性的探讨3. 烏瞰圖与20世纪初俄罗斯政治和社会环境的关系三、烏瞰圖的恐怖效应:恐惧感和心理效应1. 烏瞰圖对人类恐惧心理的刺激和触发2. 烏瞰圖对阅读体验的影响和作用3. 烏瞰圖对人们心理健康的可能影响和风险四、烏瞰圖的象征主题:存在和虚无之间的对比1. 烏瞰圖与人类存在主题的联系和共鸣2. 烏瞰圖与虚无或无意义主题的呈现和阐述3. 烏瞰圖与人类关系和故事复杂性的关系五、烏瞰圖的阅读策略:理智化和情感化的平衡1. 烏瞰圖的理智解读和心理准备要求2. 烏瞰圖的情感理解和震撼体验需要3. 烏瞰圖对阅读策略和文学倫理的启示和挑戰六、烏瞰圖的艺术价值:文学创作和美学质量1. 烏瞰圖在俄罗斯文学史上的地位和价值2. 烏瞰圖作为恐怖小说的特殊表现形式3. 烏瞰圖作品的语言艺术和思想深度的探讨七、烏瞰圖的评价和争议:多种解读和评价观点1. 烏瞰圖作品受到的评价和反响2. 烏瞰圖作品的不同解读和争议观点3. 烏瞰圖作品的普遍价值和特定局限的探讨八、烏瞰圖的文化后响:影响和传承1. 烏瞰圖作品在俄罗斯文学传统中的影响和作用2. 烏瞰圖作品对国际恐怖小说的影响和传承3. 烏瞰圖作品在不同文化环境下的诠释和传播九、烏瞰圖的未来前景:文学创作和文化发展1. 烏瞰圖作品的未来发展和演变趋势2. 烏瞰圖作品在当代恐怖文学中的地位和前景3. 烏瞰圖作品对当代文化和社会发展的启示和反思当针对每个提纲分析时,可以发现:一、文本分析和情节探讨:本部分主要是描述烏瞰圖出现的情境、特征,以及小说人物对其的反应和描述等,通过分析文本和情节,更深入地了解烏瞰圖的形象和恐怖效应。