小度写范文【七宗“最”】七宗罪模板

美国电影《七宗罪》影评作文美国电影《七宗罪》影评作文（精选）导语：七宗罪，指人类恶行的分类，由13世纪道明会神父圣多玛斯·阿奎纳列举出各种恶行的表现。

分别是傲慢、妒忌、暴怒、懒惰、贪婪、贪食及色欲。

下面是小编为您整理的观后感，欢迎阅读。

美国电影《七宗罪》影评1看完《七宗罪》勾起了些想法不能算影评影后感而已写下来好了。

首先这电影不是快乐大结局反而颇有点黑色描写了系列谋杀。

看完它甚至觉得身边到处是这七原罪的存在。

看到很多评论说压抑黑暗。

虽说世界不是a、fine、world。

难道世界真的太黑暗太让人失望了?世界的确是不像很多人想象的那么美好但也不是很多想象的那么糟糕但不同处境的人眼里不一样。

世界就是现实somehow它发展成了现在的样子。

有美有丑什么都有再正常不过。

片中的被害者不是仅仅为了电影情节而设计的人。

肮脏混乱阴暗的居民区超级胖子懒惰者爱钱的律师妓女还有各种能想到和不能想到的人都活在这个世界上每一处都差不多。

而日常更充斥生活的不是片中谋杀这样的重罪而是一些不足道的小“恶”。

比如开车超速路口逼行人夫妻整日吵架一家人痛苦甚至你跟我说话我没耐心听。

越写越觉得生活糟糕?当我先入为主地认为生活是黑暗的时候会注意力集中在黑暗的地方来证实已经有的“世界是黑暗的”想法。

如果想光明的地方也会发现很多美好之处那么多有爱的时刻。

于是有人想那到底是美的多还是丑的多呢?实际上很多事没法分类成美还是丑好还是坏。

拿战争来说吧。

战争几乎是所有人厌恶和想要避免的从某个角度说却是好事。

它不可否认地减缓了资源的竞争让激烈的矛盾缓和能换取战后长期的和平稳定的生活。

同一件事不同的时间地点不同的认知角度立场可以看出不同的.善恶美丑。

世界本来就没有固定的样子。

颇为无奈的是几乎所有情况下我们看到的世界我们的想法是被自己的经历环境角度知识等等限制的看不到别人的角度。

上帝创造出不同语言来隔离人和人从而阻碍建造巴别塔而真正隔离人的是每一个人看食物的角度都不同的这个事实。

上帝用七天创造了世界，创造了人。

上帝把一个纷繁复杂世界送给了人，人在世界中修炼成了七宗罪，暴食、贪婪、懒惰、淫欲、骄傲、嫉妒、愤怒。

于是有人，把自己的手纹全部的削去，过起隐士般的生活，收集阅读各类人道、负罪、认罪、神学的记录。

隐士决定用七天的时间来布道，用神的旨意来惩罚那些罪人。

隐士为一个肥胖者买来大量的食物，用枪逼迫肥胖者吃下大量食物，肥胖者连吃了两天，最后因为大量进食，使全身青筋充血、肠胃暴裂而亡。

隐士用暴食方式来惩罚一个暴食者。

隐士留下了“长路漫漫而艰苦，一出地狱即见光明”这样一句话向警员挑衅，这只是他布道的第一步。

隐士潜入全市最红但声名狼藉，对钱财贪婪律师的办公室，并割下律师身上的一磅肉放在天平称上后，杀死了律师。

并留下了一句莎翁《威尼斯商人》中的对白“割他一磅肉，不多也不少，不含软骨，不带硬骨”，这是隐士对贪婪者的惩罚，还在现场留下了下一个目标的指向，好让警员准确找到下案发现场，和他一起完成一系列的行动。

怎么样算懒惰？一个有吸毒、强奸、抢劫屡屡犯案却逍遥法外的人渣，自然成为懒惰的代表。

隐士用最有耐心的方式，最费时的方式折磨了这个人渣两年。

在这两年里隐士切下了人渣的手，把人渣钉在床上，不断在人渣身上划开各式各样的伤口，注射各式各样的抗生素、维他命，一边折磨人渣一边维持人渣的生命，让人渣成了生不如死的活人标本。

用相机记录下人渣这两年间，由人渣变成标本的过程。

你可能无法再想出更极致的方式来惩罚一个懒惰者吧？警员通过线报在隐士的家中找到隐士下一个目标是一个带性病的妓女，她将配合隐士来完成对淫欲的惩罚。

隐士为妓女定制一付奇思妙想的SM器具，找来一陌生男子，逼迫其使用SM器具把妓女活活弄死，场面的血腥度可想而知，弄得陌生男子对性爱是永远的惧怕。

等警员赶到下一个案发现场时，发现隐士把一位极度爱美的女名模鼻子割掉了，给了名模一个电话和一瓶安眠药，留下了这样一句话“你若求救可活命，但容貌已毁，你可以选择服药自杀”。

七宗罪_1200字人为什么会死，因为人有罪，行行为为都是罪，宽恕罪恶的最好方法就是死亡，但是人们不愿意自己去死亡，他们就会用各种生物来代替自己，以宽恕自己的罪过，可是人们一直都忘了，杀生也是一种罪过。

当看到成都一所中学从4000余名学生中选出了19名“尖子生”享受学校表扬的“最优待遇”——和校长一同共进晚餐的消息时，我就认为，这位校长应该要准备好十头牛来救赎他所犯下的罪过，还要准备十头羊来救赎他因为杀了十头牛引发的罪过。

但丁说过，人间共有七宗罪，傲慢、妒忌、暴怒、懒惰、贪婪、饕餮及色欲，我说，这位校长已经犯了傲慢、妒忌、暴怒、贪婪四罪。

一罪，傲慢。

这不是说校长傲慢，也不是说被选出来的学生傲慢。

但是这样宴请的行为会滋生傲慢，全校只有他们19位学生能够和校长共进晚餐，而且这次晚餐肯定不是秘密性的，它会在学校被公布，参加者的名字会一次又一次的被播报，而这，是一种骄傲的资本，当骄傲把握不够度时，就会变成傲慢。

不过，我也一直不明白，为什么与校长进餐会变成一种最尊贵的待遇。

他只是一个校长，并不是巴菲特，你可以跟人家说你跟巴菲特进过餐。

但是你跟人家说你跟某某某进过餐的时候人家肯定会问，某某某是谁？你会说，是我们校长啊。

人家又会问，哦，那你们是什么学校啊？二罪，妒忌。

当等级分明之后，被分到低一等级的人肯定会不高兴，他们不会全部都想到自己为什么会被分到低等级，那些想到为什么的人也许早已经不在乎校方所谓的荣誉，早已成为一个跳出于作业外，游离于课外间的校内仙人。

那些想不明白为什么会这样的人呢，他们自然而然的会嫉妒起那些与校长共进晚餐的人来，嫉妒会生恨，恨会滋生第三罪，愤怒。

关于第三罪，不用多说，我也是此罪的受害者，作为一个由优生变为差生而且一直都是差生的活标本，我在看到尖子生的时候也会有莫名的愤怒，为什么学校会给他们更好的设备更多的待遇，仅仅是因为他们的成绩可以作为学校在上级部门和别的学校面前炫耀的资本么？如果是因为如此，我会为我以前的学校道歉，对不起，我拉你们毛茸茸的大腿了。

GAMT作文七宗罪第一宗罪：无因果联系The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification.The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B,the former event is responsible for the latter.(The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality.However,the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.)But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out.For example,perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.第二宗罪Insufficient-sampleThe evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it.One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion(The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends),unless it can be shown that A1is representative of all A. It is possible that....In fact,in face of such limited evidence,the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.第三宗罪:错误类比(based on a false analogy)<横向>The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak,since although there are points of comparison between A and B,there is much dissimilarity as well.For example,A...,however,B....Thus,it is likely much more difficult for B to do....第四宗罪all things are equal<纵向>The author commits the fallacy of“all things are equal”.The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that....The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations.However,it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago.Thus it is impossible to conclude that....第五宗罪Either-Or choiceThe author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives andthere is no room for a middle ground.However,the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or mon sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.第六宗罪survey is doubtfulThe poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative.The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll,who responded,or when,where and how the poll was conducted.(Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents,it is impossible to access the validity of the results.For example,if200persons were surveyed but only2responded,the conclusion that...would be highly suspect.Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,)Until these questions are answered,the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.第七宗罪gratuitous assumptionThe author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that....However,no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption.In fact,this is not necessarily the case.For example,it is more likely that....Therefore,this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.开头段模板The conclusion endorsed in this argument is that...Several reasons are offered in support of this argument.First of all'what's more'of equal importance is that.At first glance,the author's argument appears to be somewhat convincing,but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion.A careful examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.结尾段模板To conclude,this argument is not persuasive as it stands.Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that.To make this argument logically acceptable,the author would have to show that.In addition,to solidify the conclusion,the author should provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that.Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.选择性样本攻击A threshold problem is that the author provides no evidence to claim that the general group as a whole is of the same characteristic.The example cited,while suggestive of this trend,is insufficient to warrant its truth because there is no reason to believe that the sample is representative of the whole general group. One need only observe A to appreciate the truth that such evidence would be clearly unrepresentative of the entire general group for obvious reasons.In fact,in face of such limited anecdotal evidence,it is fallacious for the author to draw any conclusion at all.样本数量攻击Another problem that seriously weaken the logic of this argument is that the survey cited is based on too small a sample to be reliable.Offered in support of the argument,the only evidence is that.Unless it can be shown that the sample is typical of all general group,the fact that is groundless for claiming that.Loaded question和诚实性攻击What's more,the methodology of the survey is problematic for two reasons.For one thing,we are not informed whether the survey provided only3alternatives.If it did,the respondents,who might very well prefer another choice not provided in the survey,might be forced to give up their preferences.For another thing,we are not informed whether the survey response were anonymous or even confidential.If they were not,regardless of whether the responses were truthful,the respondents might supply responses favored by their superiors who might conduct the survey.Both events would lead this survey unreliable,let alone about drawing the conclusion that.样本代表性攻击Moreover,a possible methodology problem in this argument is that of bias.At first place,the term‘so many'is too vague to be statistically meaningful.Even if by‘so many'the author means‘nearly all',perhaps workers who were more interested than others in the survey might be more likely to respond to the questionnaire—possibly because they found the questionnaire more cking in the information about the number of workers surveyed and the number of respondents,it is impossible to assess the validity of the survey. For instance,if1000workers were surveyed but only10responded,the result should be highly suspect.Because the author fails to account for otherinterpretations such as this,the survey would be useless in concluding that.样本时效性攻击Last but not the least,it is necessary to point out another flaw that significantly undermines this argument that the author neglects to indicate how recently the survey was actually conducted.When used to generally claim a particular group,the samples should be close enough to support the generalization,so as to prevent historical changes from invalidating the generalization.All we know is that the survey is recently published.The less recent the survey itself,the less reliable the results to demonstrate that.必要性攻击At first place,the author unfairly assumes that A determined solely by B.While B is a seemingly important element in determining A,it is hardly the only or even necessarily required element.This assumption overlooks other crucial criteria in determining A—such as C,D,to list just a few.Accordingly,without accounting for these potential factors,the author concludes too hastily that these prescriptions cited are the best means of achieving goals.充分性攻击At second place,the author's solution rests on the assumption that B is sufficient to give birth to the desired goals.However,if it turns out that A is due to a combination of factors,some of which will remain unchanged in the future,such as C and D,mere B might have no stimulating impact on A.时序性因果攻击Firstly,the author engaged in‘after this,therefore,because of this'reasoning.The line of reasoning is that because A before B,the former caused the latter.However,this reasoning is fallacious unless other possible causal factors have been considered and ruled out.For example,perhaps C.Yet another possibility is that D.As a result,any decision aimed at addressing the problem of B must be based on more thorough investigation to gather data in order to narrow down and locate the actual cause of B.同时性因果攻击Secondly,the author's solution rests on the assumption that A is the cause of B just because A coincided with B.However,a mere positional correlation does not necessarily prove a causal relationship.In addition,all other prospective causes of B,such as C and D,to list just a few,must be ruled out.Lacking detailed analysis of the real source of B,it would be sheer folly to attribute B to A.忽略他因攻击Thirdly,the author has focused only on B.A more detailed analysis would reveal that other factors far outweigh the factor on which the author focuses. For example,C and cking a more comprehensive analysis of the causes of A,it is presumptuous on the part of author to claim that A determined sole by B.因果倒置攻击At last,it is possible that the author has confused cause with effect respecting A.Perhaps B was a response to A.Since the author was failed to account for this possibility.The claim that is completely unwarranted.差异概念攻击To begin with,we must establish the meaning of the vague concept A.If the term were synonymous with B,the evidence cited would strongly support the argument.However,A may be defined in other terms such as C and D. Accordingly,the author has drawn the conclusion too hastily due to the ignorance of other definitions of A.范围内推攻击What's more,the most egregious reasoning error in this argument is the author's use of evidence pertaining to a general group as the basis of a particular B.Even if the reasoning may be sound in general sense,the particular situation that B is involved in may not be representative of the entire general group. It is possible that.If this is the case,the claim that is ill founded.不随时变攻击Moreover,the author unfairly assumes that A will remain unchanged over the next decades.However,a mere recent one-year A is insufficient to claim that.Statistics form such limited anecdotal evidence is not a good indicator for this trend.In addition,it is possible that in the future,should this trend greatly fluctuate or even reverse,the adopting of the author's proposal might give birth to B,for whatever reason,which might have a negative impact on C1and,in turns,C2. Admittedly,this argument would be even weaker and weaker each day as time goes by.错误类比攻击Additionally,it is highly doubtful that strategies drawn from A are applicable to B.However,differences between the two clearly outweigh thesimilarities,therefore making the analogy much less than valid.For example,C and D all affect A but virtually absent in B.Similarly,E and F,which significantly influent B,have no impact on A.Accordingly,problems such as these show that A and B are dissimilar in ways relevant to the likelihood that B will experience the same consequence if it adopts A's strategies.非此即彼攻击Last but not the least,the author unfairly assumes that a reader must make a either-or choice.However,the argument fails to rule out possibility that adjusting A and B might produce better results.Moreover,if the author is wrong in the assumption that A and B are the only causes of the problem,thus the most effective solution might include a complex of other factor changes—such as C and D,to list just a few.In any event,the author provides no justification for the mutually exclusive choice imposed on the reader.Argement范文1.The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of theApogee Company.“When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location,it was more profitable than it is today.Therefore,the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location.Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees.”Discuss how well reasoned...etc.In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee Company should close down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single,centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location.For a couple of reasons,this argument is not very convincing.First,the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision of employees.This assumption is never supported with any data or projections.Moreover,the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency that could result from centralization.For instance,company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly served by a field office,creating travel costs and loss of critical time.In short,this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies.Second,the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single,centralized location.But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability?It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products,careless product pricing, inefficient production,poor employee expense account monitoring,ineffective advertising,sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending.Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits,this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event(decreasing profits)follows another(decentralization),the second event has been caused by the first.In conclusion,this is a weak argument.To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize,this author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively.2.The following appeared in a memorandum issued by a large city’s council on thearts.“In a recent citywide poll,fifteen percent more residents said that they watch television programs about the visual arts than was the case in a poll conducted five years ago.During these past five years,the number of people visiting ourcity’s art museums has increased by a similar percentage.Since the corporate funding that supports public television,where most of the visual arts programs appear,is now being threatened with severe cuts,we can expect that attendance at our city’s art museums will also start to decrease.Thus some of the city’s funds for supporting the arts should be reallocated to public television.”Discuss how well reasoned...etc.In this argument the author concludes that the city should allocate some of its arts funding to public television.The conclusion is based on two facts:(1)attendance at the city’s art museum has increased proportionally with the increases in visual-arts program viewing on public television,and(2)public television is being threatened by severe cuts in corporate funding.While this argument is somewhat convincing,a few concerns need to be addressed.To begin with,the argument depends on the assumption that increased exposure to the visual arts on television,mainly public television,has caused a similar increase in local art-museum attendance.However,just because increased art-museum attendance can be statistically correlated with similar increases in television viewing of visual-arts programs,this does not necessarily mean that the increased television viewing of arts is the cause of the rise in museum attendance.Moreover,perhaps there are other factors relevant to increased interest in the local art museum;for instance,maybe a new director had procured more interesting, exciting acquisitions and exhibits during the period when museum attendance increased,in addition,the author could be overlooking a common cause of both increases.It is possible that some larger social or cultural phenomenon is responsible for greater public interest in both television arts programming and municipal art museums.To be fair,however,we must recognize that the author’s assumption is a special case of a more general one that television viewing affects people’s attitudes and mon sense and observation tell me that this is indeed the case.After all,advertisers spend billions of dollars on television ad time because they trust thisassumption as well.In conclusion,I am somewhat persuaded by this author’s line of reasoning.The argument would be strengthened if the author were to consider and rule out other significant factors that might have caused the increase in visits to the local art museum.3.The following appeared in a report presented for discussion at a meeting of thedirectors of a company that manufactures parts for heavy machinery.“The falling revenues that the company is experiencing coincide with delays in manufacturing.These delays,in turn,are due in large part to poor planning in purchasing metals.Consider further that the manager of the department that handles purchasing of raw materials has an excellent background in general business,psychology,and sociology,but knows little about the properties of metals.The company should,therefore,move the purchasing manager to the sales department and bring in a scientist from the research division to be manager of the purchasing department.”Discuss how well reasoned...etc.In response to a coincidence between falling revenues and delays in manufacturing, the report recommends replacing the manager of the purchasing department.The grounds for this action are twofold.First,the delays are traced to poor planning in purchasing metals.Second,the purchasing manager’s lack of knowledge of the properties of metals is thought to be the cause of the poor planning.It is further recommended that the position of the purchasing manager be filled by a scientist from the research division and that the current purchasing manager be reassigned to the sales department.In support of this latter recommendation,the report states that the current purchasing manager’s background in general business, psychology,and sociology equip him for this new assignment.The recommendations advanced in the report are questionable for two reasons.To begin with,the report fails to establish a causal connection between the fallingrevenues of the company and the delays in manufacturing.The mere fact that falling revenues coincide with delays in manufacturing is insufficient to conclude that the delays caused the decline in revenue.Without compelling evidence to support the causal connection between these two events,the report’s recommendations are not worthy of consideration.Second,a central assumption of the report is that knowledge of the properties of metals is necessary for planning in purchasing metals.No evidence is stated in the report to support this crucial assumption.Moreover,it is not obvious that such knowledge would be required to perform this task.Since planning is essentially a logistical function,it is doubtful that in-depth knowledge of the properties of metals would be helpful in accomplishing this task.In conclusion,this is a weak argument.To strengthen the recommendation that the manager of the purchasing department be replaced,the author would have to demonstrate that the falling revenues were a result of the delays in manufacturing. Additionally,the author would have to show that knowledge of the properties of metals is a prerequisite for planning in purchasing metals.4.The following appeared in an announcement issued by the publisher of TheMercury,a weekly newspaper.“Since a competing lower-priced newspaper,The Bugle,was started five years ago,The Mercury’s circulation has declined by10,000readers.The best way to get more people to read The Mercury is to reduce its price below that of The Bugle,at least until circulation increases to former levels.The increased circulation of The Mercury will attract more businesses to buy advertising space in the paper.”Discuss how well reasoned...etc.A newspaper publisher is recommending that the price of its paper,The Mercury, be reduced below the price of a competing newspaper,The Bugle.This recommendation responds to a severe decline in circulation of The Mercury during the5-year period following the introduction of The Bugle.The publisher’s line of reasoning is that lowering the price of The Mercury will increase its readership, thereby increasing profits because a wider readership attracts more advertisers.This line of reasoning is problematic in two critical respects.While it is clear that increased circulation would make the paper more attractive to potential advertisers,it is not obvious that lowering the subscription price is the most effective way to gain new readers.The publisher assumes that price is the only factor that caused the decline in readership.But no evidence is given to support this claim.Moreover,given that The Mercury was the established local paper,it is unlikely that such a mass exodus of its readers would be explained by subscription price alone.There are many other factors that might account for a decline in The Mercury’s popularity.For instance,readers might be displeased with the extent and accuracy of its news reporting,or the balance of local to other news coverage.Moreover,it is possible The Mercury has recently changed editors,giving the paper a locally unpopular political perspective.Or perhaps readers are unhappy with the paper’s format,the timeliness of its feature articles,its comics or advice columns,the extent and accuracy of its local event calendar,or its rate of errors.In conclusion,this argument is weak because it depends on an oversimplified assumption about the causal connection between the price of the paper and its popularity.To strengthen the argument,the author must identify and explore relevant factors beyond cost before concluding that lowering subscription prices will increase circulation and,thereby,increase advertising revenues.5.The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regionallife.“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location.Even in the recent recession,Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average.It is the industrial center of the region,and historically it has provided more than its share of theregion’s manufacturing jobs.In addition,Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”Discuss how well reasoned...etc.In this argument corporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a new location or new business opportunities.To support this recommendation,the author points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region,providing most of the region’s manufacturing jobs and enjoying a lower-than-average unemployment rate.Moreover,it is argued,efforts are currently underway to expand the economic base of the city by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.This argument is problematic for two reasons.To begin with,it is questionable whether the available labor pool in Helios could support all types of corporations.Given that Helios has attracted mainly industrial and manufacturing companies in the past,it is unlikely that the local pool of prospective employees would be suitable for corporations of other types.For example,the needs of research and development companies would not be met by a labor force trained in manufacturing skills.For this reason,it’s unlikely that Helios will be successful in its attempt to attract companies that focus or research and development of innovative technologies.Another problem with the available work force is its size.Due to the lower than average unemployment rate in Helios,corporations that require large numbers of workers would not find Helios attractive.The fact that few persons are out of work suggests that new corporations will have to either attract new workers to Helios or pay the existing workers higher wages in order to lure them away from their current jobs.Neither of these alternatives seems enticing to companies seeking to relocate.In conclusion,the author has not succeeded in providing compelling reasons for selecting Helios as the site for a company wishing to relocate.In fact,the reasons offered function better as reasons for not relocating to Helios.Nor has the author provided compelling reasons for companies seeking new business opportunities tochoose Helios.6.The following appeared in the health section of a magazine on trends andlifestyles.“People who use the artificial sweetener aspartame are better off consuming sugar,since aspartame can actually contribute to weight gain rather than weight loss.For example,high levels of aspartame have been shown to triggera craving for food by depleting the brain of a chemical that registers satiety,orthe sense of being full.Furthermore,studies suggest that sugars,if consumed after at least45minutes of continuous exercise,actually enhance the body’s ability to burn fat.Consequently,those who drink aspartame-sweetened juices after exercise will also lose this calorie-burning benefit.Thus it appears that people consuming aspartame rather than sugar are unlikely to achieve their dietary goals.”Discuss how well reasoned...etc.In this argument the author concludes that people trying to lose weight are better off consuming sugar than the artificial sweetener aspartame.To support this conclusion the author argues that aspartame can cause weight gain by triggering food cravings,whereas sugar actually enhances the body’s ability to burn fat. Neither of these reasons provides sufficient support for the conclusion.The first reason that aspartame encourages food cravings is supported by research findings that high levels of aspartame deplete the brain chemical responsible for registering a sense of being sated,or full.But the author’s generalization based on this research is unreliable.The research was based on a sample in which large amounts of aspartame were administered;however,the author applies the research findings to a target population that includes all aspartame users,many of whom would probably not consume high levels of the artificial sweetener.The second reason that sugar enhances the body’s ability to burn fat is based onthe studies in which experimental groups,whose members consumed sugar after at least45minutes of continuous exercise,showed increased rates of fat burning. The author’s general claim,however,applies to all dieters who use sugar instead of aspartame,not just to those who use sugar after long periods of exercise.Once again,the author’s generalization is unreliable because it is based on a sample that clearly does not represent all dieters.To conclude,each of the studies cited by the author bases its findings on evidence that does not represent dieters in general;for this reason,neither premise of this argument is a reliable generalization.Consequently,I am not convinced that dieters are better off consuming sugar instead of aspartame.7.The following appeared in the editorial section of a corporate newsletter.“The common notion that workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false,or at least outdated:a recently published survey indicates that79 percent of the nearly1,200workers who responded to survey questionnaires expressed a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs.”Discuss how well reasoned...etc.Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs,the author concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues.Specifically,it is argued that since79percent of the1200workers who responded to survey expressed interest in these topics,the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is incorrect.The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.First,the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified.For example,if the corporation employs2000workers,the fact that79percent of the nearly1200。

犯罪电影《七宗罪》观后感最新范文600字《七宗罪》影片以罪犯约翰·杜制造的连环杀人案件为线索，从警员沙摩塞和米尔斯的视角出发，讲了“七宗罪”系列谋杀案的故事。

七宗罪这部作品蕴含着深刻的道理，你看完之后有什么感想呢?下面是小编为你带来的犯罪电影《七宗罪》的观后感范文600字，欢迎阅读。

犯罪电影《七宗罪》的观后感范文600字1暴食、贪婪、懒惰、愤怒、骄傲、淫欲和嫉妒这教的七重罪孽是现实生活中普遍存在的，大多是驱使人们犯罪的动机。

罪犯约翰根据七项罪恶选取目标人物，为了追求心中的那份完美以上帝的名义去执行正义。

他做的只是窃取别人的生命，并无法改变这个社会的现状，他以为这样就可以消灭世间的罪恶，他错了，罪由心生，人和其他事物一样，是辩证的个体，集优缺点于一身。

威廉告诉米尔斯，如果你在路上遭遇抢劫，你不要喊救命而要大喊救火，因为别人只关心他自己。

碰瓷党的诞生打击了一大批热心市民，原本好心办好事却被讹，他们利用别人的善心赚取自己的利益还不为此感到羞耻，看到类似新闻事件报道我会很气愤，我气愤为什么会有这样的无耻之徒存在，为什么查出真相之后不把这些人qiang毙，但是看到的多了，也就习以为常了。

存在即合理，他们再无耻也是人，是贪婪、懒惰导致了这样的行为，他们的行为只是求财，只是惋惜他们的行为导致了一部分人的冷漠。

之前乞丐的定义是为生活所迫，寄生于大众，而现在乞丐定义为高薪职业，有手有脚却想着坐享其成，甚至带着小孩一起坐在马路边乞讨，我们无法改变他们的想法，也无法阻止这样的发展趋势，不要气馁，因为连上帝也无法改变这个世界，那我们能做的就是尽自己所能，做自己本分，在他们需要帮助的时候伸出援助之手，在老奶奶捡东西的时候帮个忙，在别人要摔跤的时候扶一把，在看到老大爷不容易地路边弹唱的时候赠一顿米饭，在游客问路的时候指条明路，勿因善小而不为，这些都是我们能够做到的。

影片最后那句经典名言“海明威说过：这世界是好地方，值得为此奋斗。

光阴似箭，日月轮转，一年又一年的过去了。

回首过往诸多留恋，虽是依依不舍，但也成昨日之事。

工作上略有建树也看到了自己略微成长，成熟是个过程无论你想与不想这都成为了人生的必经之路。

嘀嗒、嘀嗒的时间就悄然逝去，父母的双鬓渐以添白，父母对孩子的溺爱依旧。

我们做儿女的还求父母为我们做些什么呢？二十好几的人了，还有很多道理没有领悟，此时此刻觉得自己显得愚蠢至极，上不能回报父母之恩情，下不调理自己的生活。

与浪荡公子有何区别？反思是最可贵的，人贵有自知之明。

懂得反思、懂得悔过自新依旧为时不晚。

第一宗罪：荒废时间罪，不懂得合适规划自己的时间，让自己的作息处于严重混乱之状态，晚上目光如炬，白天浑浑噩噩，犹如在中国过着美国时间一般。

导致工作动能大幅度降低，影响身体健康，此为一罪。

第二宗罪：散漫懒惰罪，心神涣散，懒懒洋洋能不做的事情就不作，能麻烦别人做的事情就麻烦别人去做。

工作落实能力极差，办事拖拉，效率下降。

此为二罪。

第三宗罪：反复无常罪，做是不能脚踏实地，不懂循序渐进，进一步，退两步。

反复无常持续性差，做事没有连贯性，凡是不能一气呵成，或停滞不前，或半路退缩，或安于现状影响正常生活和工作。

此为三罪。

第四宗罪：小富即安罪，思想上的巨人、行动上的矮人，抱着远大理想，行动却安于现状，不懂拼搏，不思进取，难堪重任，又怎能但当大事，此为第四罪。

第五宗罪：杞人忧天罪，形如蜗牛，负于重物，杞人忧天，忧心忡忡，手脚皆束缚。

难展身手被负面思想与悲观心态而左右，难以领悟生活真谛，这样有如何承担起一个家的责任，这样又如何可以保护身边的人呢？此为第五罪。

第六宗罪：与家人不善罪，在外边人某狗样，回家却蛮横无理，对长辈不尊重，对父母不尽孝道，惹家人恼怒，惹父母伤心，父母年岁逐渐老却，为人子女理应尊敬父母，小事无伤大雅则可随顺父母，我们还求父母能为儿女做些什么吗？倒不如我们为父母来做些什么，让老人开心、开心这样没错，如果没有做到那么此为第六罪。

本文部分内容来自网络整理，本司不为其真实性负责，如有异议或侵权请及时联系，本司将立即删除！== 本文为word格式，下载后可方便编辑和修改！ ==让你此生难成大器的七宗罪让你此生难成大器的七宗罪是什么让你只是现在的自己，而不是你想要的自己？我猜最有可能是这七宗罪让你此生难成大器。

是，你没看错……说的就是你……说的就是你呢！我此刻死盯着你的眼睛（好吧，也不是那么名副其实的“盯着”，因为你看到的是这篇文章不是我，但请想象，我现在正在死盯着你，我的镭射眼大概已经“看穿”你的脸了）告诉你，你一点儿逃跑的机会都没有。

我肯定，如果你看完这文章的罪状还不觉得这是你的问题所在，那你就该发愁了。

其实你该愁死了才对。

你该做的就是放下手头一切事情，深刻反省自己的存在有何意义。

你该照面镜子，盯着自己的眼睛，举起手来给自己一个大耳刮子才是。

听明白了吗？没明白那就继续啪啪啪直到你醒悟过来！当你准备好了，再继续往下看吧。

这里我要说的是“真枪实弹”的实战技能！不是所谓的“多学少玩第一名”，也不是你那本价值万金的文凭宣称你身怀的“懒散逃课打游戏把妹照旧毕业”的绝技。

我说的是，起身出门、有所行动、干出点儿屁事来的技能！就是那一套搬出爸妈的房子、辞职再冲全世界吼一声“草泥马”然后真真正正干点儿事情的技能。

那套人人都愿意为之付出学习代价的技能，那套已日渐消亡的技能。

如此技能自然不能在课堂上或课本中习得。

要掌握如此技能，实践出真知是唯一方法，譬如出生鸟儿借从悬崖跳落之际习得飞翔技巧。

如此技能只有在一个人发现了真正自我之时才能学会。

也就是说，只有当你真正处于危险之中或直面失败的时候，才能掌握。

如此技能，只有在你愿意付出一切只为做成一件大事的时候，才能习得。

如此技能，在此刻之前，你以为你已经掌握。

“简单说来，我要说的就是，在生活这个游戏里，你连门儿都没找着”。

第一宗罪：你失败得还不够。

因为你满足于平庸，因为你选择不去尝试。

因为只在嘴上说说学习一门新外语（或编程）比真正去学容易太多。

七宗罪观后感精选作文社会阴暗无救弗里曼绝望但是还是继续这个案子最后来到了郊外放晴象徵远离了阴暗潮湿的城市远离了那个罪恶的地方来到这个乡郊野外没有罪恶的地方最后皮特成为了愤怒的代表john却给自己扣上了嫉妒的罪名网上有人说盒子里是狗的头说的也有点道理但从电影来看就是皮特老婆的头john为什麽要杀这个没有罪的女人？或许是因为她不相信自己的丈夫怀孕的事宁愿告诉别的男人也不告诉丈夫这也是这个罪恶的城市裏面人心冷漠的缩影其他挖苦的地方还有很多比如图书馆裏面守夜的保安们面对这麼多书却宁愿彻夜打牌比如皮特对威尼斯商人中经典片段一无所知这个情况不单单美国放眼全世界都是这样让全社会的人每个人都懂圣经读莎士比亚是不可能的即使如此这个社会就会不这麼冷漠不这麼罪恶吗？也是不可能的电影中只交代了七宗罪可是没有交代人们是怎麼走出来的也许这部电影其实不想这麼做留给观众反思这个社会终究怎麼样才能变成人们想要的样子呢？是充满文化？还是简单地对彼此坦诚？或许从身边做起会渐渐好起来电影拍摄於1995年的美国现在的中国何尝不是这个样子？不同的是美国人从那时起就开始反思就有这样的电影作品出来可是看看中国的导演们拍了些什麼东西出来……--------------《七宗罪》向人们呈现了一个变态的宗教杀手，七宗罪观后感。

片中的主人公是一个忠诚的宗教信徒，一生中写过上千本日记，其精神世界是何等的空虚，他所信仰的宗教没有成为救赎灵魂的使者，反被其利用为犯罪的工具。

我们所处的社会处于转型期，各种利益冲突加剧，这样的社会中更加需要一个良性的疏导与协调机制，去化解社会底层矛盾。

他的犯罪动机超越了一般的刑事犯罪，在面对这类犯罪时传统的侦查思维和侦查方法将寸步难行，以动机为出发点寻找嫌疑人的传统侦查模式显得力不从心。

当警察找到了某种依据来施行对人的谋杀时，令人毛骨悚然，观后感《七宗罪观后感》。

这种恐惧并不是是亲眼看到某种可怕场面时感官的自然反应，而是心理上的恐惧，在我们社会物质财富开始极大丰富的时候，以宗教为名义的恶性刑事犯罪正屡见不鲜的出现在我们面前。

说话的七宗罪TED演讲人类的声音，是我们所有人都弹奏的乐器。

可能是这个世界上最有力的声音。

它绝无仅有，或能引起战争，或能说“我爱你”。

然而，很多人有这种经历，当他们说的时候，人们并不在听。

这是为什么呢？我们怎样有力地说而让世界发生某种改变？我所提议的是，我们需要改变一些习惯。

在此我为你们收集整理了，说话的七宗罪。

这七个，我认为是我们相当容易犯的坏习惯。

第一就是，流言蜚语，在背后说某些人的坏话。

这不是一个好习惯，我们都很明白。

那个说闲话的人在五分钟以后就会在别人跟前说我们的闲话。

第二，评判。

我们知道有些人在谈话中是这样的，这让人很难听进别人的话，如果你知道你被人评判且被认为不合格。

第三，消极。

你能陷入这个泥潭。

我的母亲，在她生命的最后几年里，变得非常非常消极，很难让人听她说话。

我记得有一天，我对她说，“今天是十月一号。

”她说，“我知道，这不可怕吗？” 当某人那么消极的时候是很难让人听进去的。

另外一种消极，就是抱怨。

这是英国的全国性艺术。

是我们的全国性运动。

我们抱怨天气，体育和政治，几乎每件事，但实际上抱怨是病毒性的悲催，它不会在这个世界上传播太阳和光明。

借口。

我们都遇上过这个家伙。

也许我们都曾经是这个家伙。

有些人有指责癖好。

他们怪罪任何人，而不是对自己的行为负责任，所以，这又是让人难以聆听的一种。

七件里面的老六，倒数第二，浮夸，吹牛。

它有时贬低了我们的语言，事实上。

比如，如果我看见什么真的很神奇的事情，那我该说什么呢？当然这种夸大后来就变成了说谎。

彻头彻尾的说谎，我们就不想听这种我们知道会说谎的人。

最后是，固执己见，把事实和意见混淆。

当这两件事混为一谈，你就像在听风一样。

你知道，有人用他们自己的意见来强迫你。

这很难让我们听讲。

这就是说话的七宗罪。

我认为这些是我们需要避免的。

但有没有比较正面的呢？的确有。

我想建议四种我们可以牢靠站立的，真正强有力的基石。

那么它们到底是什么呢？看看你是否能猜到。

H，代表了诚实（Honesty），当然，说真话，直接了当并且清楚明白。

GMAT Essay Model开头段The conclusion endorsed in this argument is that…Several reasons are offered in support of this argument. First of all, the author points out that… In addition, the author reasons that… What’s more, he also assumes that … At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion. A careful examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.AWA七宗罪结论无据（other factors）The author assumes that A is due to B.However, B may be an important contributing factor but not necessary the only one. For example, such factors as… and ……may account for A.Without taking into account other essential factors, the assumption is unsupportable. The author has to rule out other factors that may lead to the conclusion.无因果联系The author falsely establishes a causal relationship.The mere fact that A is somewhat correlated with B is insufficient to establish a causal relationship.For example...Without taking into account the real relationship between two events, the assumption is unreasonable.The author has to provide more concrete evidence to prove a causal relationship between A and B.错误类比The author assumes that A is analogous to BHowever, their discrepancy outweighs their similarities. The author actually makes a false analogy.For example, A and B will be poles apart if…Without taking into account such discrepancy, the assumption is groundless.The author has to provide the A resembles B in all aspects.时地全等The author assumes that conditions of will remain unchanged as they were before. However, the future is uncertain. The argument commits a fallacy of “All things are equal”.For example…Without taking into account such possibilities, the assumption is ungrounded.The author has to rule out other possibilities that may lead to the conclusion.二者择一The author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives.And by applying such an “either-or” reasoning, the author actually presents a false dilemma.For example, there could have other possibilities that…Without taking account into other options, the assumption is unfair.The author has to rule out other options that may lead to the conclusion.可疑调查（gratuitous assumption）The evidence quoted is intended to support the author’s claim that….However, the evidence is too vague to be informative.For example…Without taking into account such potential issues, the issues may portrait a distorted view of…….and mislead the mass audience.The author has to provide the evidence to rule out that possibility.样本不足The author relies on the assumption that A is typical of B as a whole.However, the evidence quoted is too limited to substantiate the assumption.For example, it is entirely possible that……Without taking into account such cases, the assumption is unwarranted.The author has to provide the evidence that A is representative of the whole group.结尾段To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that…. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author would have to show that…. In addition, to solidify the conclusion, the author should provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that…. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.。