英文辩论 经济发展 VS 环境保护

Environment protection & Economic developmentThe positive side:Environment protection is more importantThe negative side:Economic development is more important 过程概述：开场：H:Today's debate is focus on whether environment protection or economic development is more important.P1 and P2 support that environment protection is more important ,which is on the positive side while O1 and O2 argue that economic development is more import,which is on the negative side.观点陈述：H:To begin with,I'd like the positive side to state your point ofview ,please.正方一辩极其观点陈述：H:Nex t,I' d like the nega tive side to prese nt youropinion ,please. 具体观点（Pl）反方一辩及其观点陈述：具体观点（01）自由辩论：H:Both sides have made their statements, so now we enter into the free deba te.H:Firs tly ,I'd like the nega tive side to raise ques tions.反方提问，正方回答Q1：优先发展经济不是普遍愿望吗？02 TO P2Q2：我们应当回归人类祖先的原始生话吗？02 TO P2A1：经济发展是人类发展的原动力O1A2：环境是经济发展的基础 P1H:Next, I'd like to change exchange the roles and the positive side raises questions.正方提问，反方回答Q1：花更多的空间和时间来处理环境问题，这难道不是得不偿失P2 TO O2Q2:环境成本大于经济效益的情况。

发展经济重要还是环保重要China is a developing country, and in the socialist modernization drive in the process of economic development and environmental protection often conflict. We need to protect the environment of economic development.First, we must protect the environment of economic development is the essential requirement of economic development. Economic development is to improve people's living standards. China's economic development is to solve the people's increasing material and cultural needs. Born Out of China's semi-colonial and semi-feudal agricultural country. Weak economic foundation, a low level of industrialization, in the course of economic development and economic development in the protection of the environment prevailing contradictions. Protection of the environment including the protection of people's living environment and the natural environment. Exist in the city economic development especially industrial development on the lives of the residents have a negative impact on the situation in the rural areas there is more damage the natural environment and ecological environment. The purpose of economic development is to improve people's living standards, and the process of development because of damage to the environment affect people's lives, and contrary to the original intent of economic development.Second, we must protect the environment of economic development is the strategy of sustainable development requirements. The environment we live in, our future generations have to live here. We destroy the environment of economic development, some damage is irreparable, the future generations of crime. Now c ountries around the world have attached great importance to the strategy of sustainable development research, vigorously develop the green industry, and pollution-free industries. China is a civilization with a long history and a big country in the process of economic development should also attach importance to environmental protection, to leave our future generations a better living space.Third, we must protect the environment of economic development is a natural law requirements. The process of economic development, if the serious damage to the natural environment, then we will be natural to be severely punished. Major floods caused damage to the environment are the inevitable result. In the floods in the consumption of manpower, material and financial fear of the expense of the environment more than the fruits of economic development.The laws of nature is merciless, who violated it who will be its revenge. We must attach great importance to the process of economic development in the protection of the natural environment and social environment.Fourth, economic development and resolve conflicts protection of the environment is the fundamental way to further economic development. Development is the last word. We can not lose the economic development and the protection of the environment, not because of the ground to protect the environment in the development of economic issues before the vine. Way is economic development. I t is necessary to strengthen environmental awareness and use our brains. Economic development and environmental protection are not necessarily contradictory. On the contrary, economic development should promote environmental protection. Extensive multi-level high-technology development, industrial pollution-free green. The development of the economy, the prosperity of the country, the level of development of productive forces, people conquering nature's ability to transform nature will be further strengthened. People not only have the ability to protect the environment, but also the environment can be rebuilt. Desert will be transformed into farmland. Economic development is the way to protect the environment.Fifth, the whole society should attach importance to developing the economy and protecting the environment. At present many places, there are many sectors of the expense of the environment and developing the economy. This is historical and practical reasons, but look at the use of the development issue, people will be even more profound understanding of the economic development process of the importance of environmental protection, leaders at all levels should establish environmental awareness, from the strategic height of the development of knowledge economy and the protection of the environment , based on the overall situation into consideration in the protection of the environment at the same time vigorously developing the economy and improving the people's standard of living.In short, protecting the environment and economic development are not contradictory. In the process of economic development must pay attention to protecting the environment.Because pollution will, of course, cause harm. Earth is a circle of the world. In fact, there is no absolute on the planet waste. All things can be recycled. But human intervention so that the deviation in this cycle, there has been not the cycle of things. For example, the Styrofoam boxes years ago. If this is the case, then, is a vicious circle. That the Earth's resources will be consumed End. Well, the earth dangerous. Protective measures should be as close to the Earth's self-cycle. Prevention should do more "farsightedness" and not always stare in the economic goals. Should be from the perspective of the humanities and natural starting译文：我国是发展中国家，在社会主义现代化建设过程中发展经济与保护环境时常发生冲突。

发展经济还是保护环境？英语作文发展经济还是保护环境?英语作文Developing Economy or Protecting Environment?Some people hold that we should put developing the cconomy in the first place.Only by further balancing and developing our economy can we get rid of poverty and gain the overall development of the coun-try.Otherwise,many people,espccially in rural areas,may live in pov-erty and their children may drop out of school because they could not af-ford compulsory education.On the other hand,many people insist that environmental protec-tion should be a top priority.They hold that it is the rapid and unrestrict-ed development of economy that leads to the present situation in which most parts of the world are polluted.If the problem is left unsolved,someday we may not survive on this planet,let alone develop our econ-omy.In my opinion,both economy and environmental protection are our urgent tasks at hand.Without economic development,we would remain backward.And without environmental protection,we would lose our homes.It seems that the best solution is to develop environ-mental-protection-oriented enterprises so as to "kill two birds with one stone".参考译文：发展经济还是保护环境?有些人认为我们应该首先发展经济。

正方一辩：As we all know , China is a developing country , and the economy power is far behind the developed countries.China has one fifthof the people in the world , but the average income is so low that ranks 109 in the world . I have to ask our opponent debaters , how can we protect our environment without enough money ?反方一辩: First , I have to admit that economy is very important , but I want to ask opponent debaters a questions . what is priority?正方二辩：Priority means , when two choices can’t be chosen at the same time , we have choose one out .反方一辩：Yeah , your explanation is pefect . So , whether to choose economic or environment protection is just a problem about priority not premise . As we all know , economic growth can only bring short-term profits to people while environment protection can bring long-term benefit . When the two come into collision with each with each other , we should of course choose environmrnt protection .正方二辩：Not all the environment growth can be realized just through sacrifising economic growth , because not all the environmental problems are caused by ecomomy , such as some natural disasters . And solving these environmental problems always costs a lot . So , ecomomic growth is needed.反方二辩：Although not all the environmental problems are caused by economic growth , I think , economic factors are the main causes . As weall know , in order to meet the demand of production , many trees are cut down and many animals are killed , which causes many species dying out . Besides , much harmful gas is poured out from factories , which seriously threaten people’s health . What do you think about it ?正方一辩: What we should know is that our country hasn’t been rich enough . Just as you say , now that our environment has been damaged so seriously , we should speed up to develop our economy and when we gain enough money , we can then solve it easily .反方一辩: Our environment problems can’t wait to be solved . I believe that many of us should hear of rumour about 2012 . Although 2012 is just a rumour , I think it has its reason which shows that our earth is in danger and our ecological balance is seriously damaged .正方二辩: In terms of 2012 , we should calm down first . Impulse is the devil . What we should do now is to develop our economy step by step , and I believe we can solve environmental problems efficiently before 2012 .反方总结陈词：Nowdays , our demands on materials are basically satisfied , so our central goal is life in good quality . What we need is a happy and comfortable life environment , in which people can enjoy beautiful scenery , drink clean water , breathe clean air and have a healthy body . In order to reach this goal , we have to delay economic growth sometimes .Since environment condition is so serious ,economic delaysin a short time does no matter ,compared with environment delays .So we think environment protection should receive priority .正方总结陈词：Nowadays, environmental protection has become the hotest topic all around the globe. Not only the governments, but also enterprises企业and individuals have payed their great attention to it. However, we have to admit that we are living in a realistic society, and there are too many goals that we're not able to achieve effectively without enough funds, in which, unfortunately, environmental protection is included. Environmental protection and pollution control have high requirements for high-tech and top talents. Without these supports, the proccess of one pollution control may not only be effectiveless, but also become the cause of another pollution.。

经济发展优先还是保护环境优先英文作文Sustainable Development: Balancing Economic Growth and Environmental ProtectionThe ongoing debate between economic development and environmental protection has been a persistent challenge for policymakers and societies around the world. On one hand, economic growth is essential for improving living standards, reducing poverty, and driving technological innovation. On the other hand, unchecked economic activities can have detrimental effects on the environment, leading to issues such as pollution, resource depletion, and climate change. As we navigate the complexities of this dilemma, it is crucial to find a delicate balance that allows for sustainable development, where economic progress and environmental conservation can coexist harmoniously.One of the primary arguments in favor of prioritizing economic development is the potential to lift people out of poverty and improve their quality of life. Developing nations often face the pressing need to provide their citizens with basic necessities such as food, clean water, healthcare, and access to education. Economic growth can generate the resources and funding required to invest inthese critical areas, ultimately enhancing human well-being. Additionally, economic development can foster technological advancements that can lead to more efficient and environmentally-friendly production processes, renewable energy sources, and innovative solutions to environmental challenges.However, the single-minded pursuit of economic growth without regard for environmental impacts can have severe consequences. Unrestrained industrial activities, unsustainable resource extraction, and the indiscriminate disposal of waste can result in air and water pollution, soil degradation, and the depletion of natural habitats. These environmental degradations not only harm the delicate balance of ecosystems but also pose significant risks to human health and well-being. Furthermore, the long-term effects of climate change, driven by greenhouse gas emissions from economic activities, can have far-reaching and potentially catastrophic implications for the entire planet.To achieve a sustainable balance, it is essential to adopt a holistic approach that integrates economic development and environmental protection. Governments, businesses, and individuals must work collaboratively to implement policies, technologies, and practices that promote sustainable development. This may involve investing in renewable energy sources, implementing stricter environmental regulations, incentivizing the adoption of eco-friendly technologies,and encouraging sustainable consumption and production patterns.One promising approach is the concept of a "green economy," which seeks to foster economic growth while simultaneously reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities. This model emphasizes the development of clean energy, sustainable agriculture, green infrastructure, and the circular economy, where waste is minimized and resources are reused or recycled. By aligning economic interests with environmental stewardship, a green economy can create new job opportunities, spur innovation, and contribute to the long-term well-being of both people and the planet.Another key aspect of sustainable development is the recognition of the intrinsic value of the natural environment and the need to protect it for its own sake, not just for its instrumental value to human activities. This perspective acknowledges the inherent rights of ecosystems, species, and natural resources, and calls for a more ecocentric approach to decision-making. This may involve setting aside protected areas, implementing stricter conservation measures, and recognizing the cultural and spiritual significance of the natural world.Ultimately, the balance between economic development and environmental protection is a complex and nuanced issue that requires careful consideration of various factors, including localcontexts, global interdependencies, and the long-term implications of our actions. By embracing a holistic and collaborative approach, we can strive to create a future where economic prosperity and environmental sustainability coexist, ensuring a better quality of life for present and future generations.。

Good morning ladies and gentleman,contestants and adjudicators，i feel extremely honored to have the debate with the affirmative side ,now please let me represent the negative side to make the conclusion statement.To start with, i will state our arguments furthermore.we never neglect the importance of the economic development but we firmly hold the view that when we faced with the economic development and environmental protection,we must put the environmental protection first.because at the beginning ,our first debater had stated that environmental protection is the essential requirements of economic development and environmental protection is the requirements of the strategy of sustainable development. furthermore, in respect of our life ,Environmental protection is the requirements of the natural law.In the process of economic development, if the serious damage to the natural environment, then we will be punished by the nature. Grievous floods is the result of the damage of the environment.in the free debate,our debaters have used plenty of examples and arguments,for example:the severe nuclear pollution and the polluted water . All the examples and opinions tell us an obvious truth that environmental protection is far more important than the economic development.therefore when faced with the problem of economic development and environmental protection ,we must give the priority to the Environmental protection to keep a healthy life.Throughout the whole debate，i incidentally found 7 problems in their arguments,but given the time limit,i will list the 4 severer problems.Firstly: the other side mistook the definition of the economic development and the Environmental protection and they just tink of the economic development as itself,they don’t combine other factors.Secondly: the other side changed the concept in their debate.what we talk today is not which one should be continued but when faced with the two problems,which sone should be put in the first place.Thirdly:One swallow does not make a summer,the other side just say one part as a whole.Last but not the least:the other side avoid answering some vital question posed by us, i think it is not good.Economic development is just like the stomach of people’s body. Stomach is always running and digesting. Even though very slight un comfort can we solve it quickly . But the environmental protection is different. It just like the human’s liver. The problems of human’s liver will counted. It will be too late when it breaks out.and finally our group prepare the Michael Jackson’s song “heal the word”for all the audience.。

英语辩论环境保护与经济发展第一篇：英语辩论环境保护与经济发展Which should receive priority in china? Environmental protection or economic growth.：Good morning everyone!We are here now debating about whether environmental protection oreconomic growth should take priority in china;we think its economy growth should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.：First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed countries, so the urgentaffair of china is to develop our economy.：Second, Economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can developour economy without environmental pollution.：Third, when our economy strength become strong, we can spend more money and energy onenvironment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in china.：We agree economic growth is needed.But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.：What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much by this means, it placed us in acompletely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.：So, we must get to the bottom of the problemand learn from the past, which is to say, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably.：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is prettygood, but there are thousands people lack of money for the food or clothes.Even in the city like Dalian, how many people can’t af ford of the expensive price of house.Do you think the problems like these can be solved by environmental protection?：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of china have solved the problem of foodand clothing at present.Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern china is very high.But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly.We have money, but being under the sub health condition.Does it make any sense, opponent debaters?：Some eastern cities do exist whose economy is quite developed, but you forget that china has 130million people.The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole china.We know that environment protection need high-technology, high-tech personnel, and science research.They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy.I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong economy strength.：Environmental protection needs money.But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth.If you drink polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection.：Economic growth is important, environmental protection is alsoimportant.And our government hasalready realized the importance of the balance between the two parts, and did achieve somegood results.I think in the future there will be on a win-win situation in the economic andenvironmental protection.第二篇：英语辩论——环境保护VS经济发展英语辩论——环境保护VS经济发展(经济发展正方）Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth.正方一辩陈词：we think it’s economy growth that should be chosen.I have three reasons to prove this point.First, as a developing country, the economy power is far behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries.So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy.Second, economy growth doesn’t necessarily conflict with environment protection.We can develop our economy without environment pollution.Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win.In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China.反方一辩陈词：We agree economic growth is needed.But the environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’ environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence.Wha t’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much.By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position.At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban conservation and the environment.So, we must get to the bottom of the problemand learn from the past.That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority.Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the futur e reasonably.That’s all I want to say.反方二辩：请问对方二辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要？经济发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗？
My fellow debaters，please allow me to ask.The economy is the temporary matter, but the
environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice;how can we still survive if there is no environment.正方二辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。

保护环境比经济发展更重要英语作文Protecting the Environment is More Important than Economic DevelopmentThe debate between environmental protection and economic development has been a longstanding one, with proponents on both sides arguing passionately for their respective positions. However, in the face of the alarming environmental challenges we are currently facing, it is clear that protecting the environment must take precedence over economic development. While economic growth is undoubtedly important for improving the living standards of people around the world, it cannot come at the expense of the natural world that sustains us all.One of the primary reasons why protecting the environment is more important than economic development is the dire consequences of environmental degradation. Climate change, caused largely by human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation, is already having a devastating impact on the planet. Rising sea levels, more frequent and intense natural disasters, and the loss of biodiversity are just a few of the consequences we are already experiencing. These environmental challenges pose a direct threat tohuman life and well-being, as they can lead to food and water scarcity, the displacement of millions of people, and the spread of infectious diseases.Moreover, the long-term costs of environmental degradation far outweigh the short-term economic benefits of unfettered development. The economic losses associated with natural disasters, the depletion of natural resources, and the decline in ecosystem services can be staggering. For example, the World Bank estimates that the annual cost of environmental degradation in developing countries is around $4.7 trillion, or about 4.7% of their gross domestic product. This figure does not even account for the indirect costs, such as the impact on human health and the loss of biodiversity, which are equally significant.In contrast, investing in environmental protection can actually spur economic growth and create new economic opportunities. The development of renewable energy sources, sustainable agriculture, and green technologies can generate jobs and drive innovation. Furthermore, a healthy environment can provide valuable ecosystem services, such as water purification, flood control, and carbon sequestration, which can reduce the costs of infrastructure and disaster response.It is also important to recognize that the pursuit of economicdevelopment at the expense of the environment is often disproportionately borne by the world's poorest and most vulnerable populations. These communities are often the most dependent on natural resources for their livelihoods and are the least equipped to cope with the consequences of environmental degradation. By prioritizing environmental protection, we can ensure a more equitable and sustainable future for all.Additionally, the moral and ethical considerations of environmental protection cannot be ignored. We have a responsibility to future generations to safeguard the planet and its resources, ensuring that they inherit a world that is livable and thriving. The decisions we make today will have lasting impacts on the well-being of our children and grandchildren, and we must act accordingly.In conclusion, the evidence clearly shows that protecting the environment is more important than economic development. The long-term costs of environmental degradation far outweigh the short-term economic benefits, and the moral and ethical imperatives to safeguard our planet and its resources are undeniable. While economic growth is important, it cannot come at the expense of the natural world that sustains us all. By prioritizing environmental protection, we can create a more sustainable and equitable future for all.。