网络表达自由论文：网络表达自由规制立法

网络表达自由论文：网络表达自由规制立法【中文摘要】网络表达自由是藉由网络的广泛使用而衍生的表达自由的新形式,它拓展了表达自由的维度,为表达自由宪政价值的实现开辟了新的路径。

随着表达自由进入到网络时代,人们以前所未有的热情关注着权利维护,公民意识得到强化,网络举报也成为反腐的利器。

但是网络的技术特性也为网络表达自由的发展埋下了隐患。

非理性的网络表达现象凸显,同时还频发网络表达自由与私权利的冲突。

这些现象表明,网络表达自由不是绝对的自由,它的良好发展离不开政府、业界及用户的综合规制。

本文从网络表达自由规制的现实必要性出发,分析了国外网络表达自由规制的理论探索及实践做法,介绍了我国网络表达自由的现状及不足,从中总结了国外对于我国网络表达自由规制可资借鉴的经验,在此基础上提出了我国网络表达自由规制的改进方向。

本文认为,我国网络表达自由的规制需要以立法的改进为着力点,同时还要发挥业者自律与用户自律的道德牵引作用,同时,政府保障网络表达自由权方面的努力也不能缺失。

本文共分为四部分。

第一部分论述了网络表达自由的一般理论,分析了网络表达自由的特点及宪法权利属性。

第二部分论述了网络表达自由规制的必要性。

规制的涵义包括保障与限制,分别对应网络表达自由的独特价值和网络表达自由的流弊。

网络表达自由的价值包括构建公共领域、推进民主进程；促进权利生发；进行舆论监督,规制权力运作。

网络表达自由还具有非理性的特点,容易和其他权利发生冲突,对此需要进行限制。

第三部分论述了国内外网络表达自由规制的现状。

对国外的理论探索做了介绍,探讨了其中较有影响的几个国家的立法及业者自律情况。

进而对我国的网络表达自由规制状况进行了介绍和评析,分析了国外经验可以借鉴的具体方面。

第四部分提出了完善我国网络表达自由规制的建议。

立法改进是重点,从立法原则上看,应该要坚持权利保护的思维,把握网络的技术特质,协调处理国际共性和民族特性的关系。

同时也介绍了立法改进的具体措施,例如遵循比例原则,实行有限实名制；改进网络服务商的责任承担等,都是急待解决的问题。

除了立法措施,我国也需要加强网络平等权的保障,吸取国外较为成熟的经验,发挥行业自律和网民自律的作用。

【英文摘要】Freedom of expression on internet has become a new derivation form of expression freedom along with the extensive application of internet. Freedom of expression on internet has expanded the dimensions of expression and has opened a new path to realize the constitutional value.As expression freedom stepping into the network age, people concerned about the right guarantee system with unprecedented highly enthusiasm, the civic consciousness has been strengthened, meanwhile, the internet denouncement has become a potent weapon of anti-corruption. However, the internet technical characteristics have buried hidden obstacles in thedevelopment process of expression freedom. Non-rational Expression highlights on the network, expression freedom right comes into conflict with other civil rights frequently. These phenomena shows that the freedom of expression on internet is not the freedom with no constraints, its promised future needs comprehensive regulation of the government, industry association and users. Taking the actual necessity as the initial point, the thesis introduces the theoretical exploration and instances in other countries with respect to the regulation problem. The thesis also commend on domestic current situation and shortages. Based on the salutary abroad lesson and national circumstances, the thesis make proposals in connection with the improving direction of the regulation. We have to emphasis on legislative improvement. Besides, industry organization self-regulation and internet users self-regulation also play an important role in the process. The government needs take measures to protect the equality right.Section one:author of thesis expounds general theory about freedom of expression on internet, we also analyzes the characteristics of the expression freedom on internet and confirms its status as the fundamental right.Section two:it is necessary to regulate the expression freedom on internet. Theexpression freedom on internet has dual character.On the one hand, it has unique value, on the other hand, it has some drawbacks. The expression freedom on internet can build public domain, and promote democratic process. Moreover, it supervises authority to protect the civil rights. Irrational expression exists and expression freedom right comes into conflict with other rights frequently, which demonstrate the necessity of regulation.Section three:The author introduces the regulation status of both home and abroad. In addition, the thesis represents the external theoretical exploration, and amplify the legislation situation and industry self-regulation situation. The thesis also commend on domestic current situation and shortages, sums up salutary abroadlesson.Section four:The thesis makes proposals in connection with the improving direction of the regulation. We should lay our press on legislative improvement. There are some legislative principles that we must follow:protection of right; assurance of Technology Characteristic; coordination of international commonality and national identity. Then, the thesis conducts specific measures of legislative improvement. We must comply with Proportional Principle and defines Internet Service Providers Responsibility taking reasonably. We mustextract abroad experience to take advantage of industry organization self-regulation and internet usersself-regulation. The government needs do his utmost to protect the equality right.【关键词】网络表达自由规制立法【采买全文】1.3.9.9.38.8.4.8 1.3.8.1.13.7.2.1同时提供论文写作定制和论文发表服务.保过包发.【说明】本文仅为中国学术文献总库合作提供，无涉版权。