新托福听力场景-地球环境学科解题技巧详解

  • 格式:doc
  • 大小:49.00 KB
  • 文档页数:4

下载文档原格式

  / 4
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

新托福听力场景-地球环境学科解题技巧详解

在之前的文章中,有为考生们讲解过地理地质学的内容,在本篇,我们进一步来研究一下地球环境学科。前者往往和化学以及考古学有所交叉,后者的内容更接近我们的实际生活或认知,比如环境变化。当然也会涉及到许多场景词汇,广大考生在备考过程中还是要认真复习备考。下面将带领大家具体看一下地球环境学类的听力段子应该如何应对。

一、概述

这一学科要求考生们要关注一些时事,并且扩大自己知识面,开拓视野,可以和地理地质学科一起关注。

☆大气环境,例如赤道无风带,大气环流,全球气候变化。

☆地面环境,例如风能,地下水的研究与保护。

☆海洋环境,例如海底热液,潮汐能。

☆其他话题,可能和天文学,生物学,地理地质学等产生交叉。

在此,考生最好能积累背景知识,多浏览一些原汁原味的报刊杂志,比如Scientific Americans、National

Geographical等等,多积累相关词汇,熟悉发音。当然,刚才也提到了,新托福听力段子所涉及的话题往往千变万化且有所交叉,考生在熟悉背景知识的同时也要打牢基础,培养快速辨音能力和短时记忆能力,才能以不变应万变。

二、案例分析

请看一个地球环境学的经典案例:

E.G.TPO17 Milankovitch Hypothesis

听力原文:

1) Ok, so we have been talking about theories that deal with the effects of

human activity on the climate. But today I’d like to talka little bit about

other theories that canexplain variations in climate. And one of the best-known

is called the Milankovitch Hypothesis

Q:What is the lecture mainly about?

AA hypothesis that explains how changes in Earth’s motions affect

climate.

BA hypothesis that explains why the shape of earth’s orbit varies over

time.

CReasons it is difficult to find evidence to support hypotheses about the

climate.

DAnalyses of the accuracy of data collected in different ways.

分析:

这是一道简单的主旨题。我们之前说过,新托福听力段子一般会在前几句出现主旨,所以考生一定要留意前几句的内容。录音文本中的划线部分为重点。只要抓住了variations

in climate,就可以轻松选出A。在记笔记时,重点标出“climate 变”即可。

2)Now, when Milankovitch first proposed this theory in the 1920s, many of his

colleagues were skeptical. Milankovitch didn’t have any proof. Actually there

wouldn’t be any evidence to support his hypothesis until the 1970s, when

oceanographers were able to drill deep into the seafloor and collect samples,

samples which were then analyzed by geologists...and this showed that earth’s

climate had changed pretty much the wayMilankovitch’s hypothesis suggested it

would.So this evidence was pretty strong supportfor the Milankovitch

Hypothesis.And by the 1980s, most people accepted this theory.

However, in the late 1980s, some scientists were exploring Devil’sHole…Well,

the Devil’ s Hole findings contradictedthe ones obtained during the 1970s, so

basically the question was, were the ages of one or both the samples were wrong,

or were scientists misunderstanding the significance of the evidence.

Q:What is the significance of the evidence found on the ocean floor?

AIt negated earlier evidence that Milankovitch found.

BIt led the development of new methods to measure global climate changes.

CIt helped Milankovitch first formulate his hypothesis.

DIt confirmed Milankovitch’s hypothesis.

分析:

解这道题的关键在于ocean floor。原文中提到pretty strong

support,所以应该是支持性的,选D。考生注意,只要出现不同理论,一定要搞清楚理论列出来的目的,即它所支持的内容是什么。

16. What did calcite deposits from Devil’s Hole reveal?

AInaccurate information about long-term climate changes.

BEvidence that contradicted Milankovitch’s hypothesis.

CEvidence that climate changes occur only locally.

DVariations in Earth’s orbit that had little impact on climate.

分析:

这道题故意绕了个弯子。我们前面提到,米兰科维奇假说在70年代被证实,在此前是没有证据的;下文又说80年代时在魔窟里发现的方解石样本又与70年代sea

floor中发现的样本相冲突,因此可以得出结论:魔窟里的发现是不支持米兰科维奇假说的,所以选B。

背景知识:

米兰科维奇假说认为地球运动的变化,特别是绕太阳轨道的变化,这些变化会导致太阳