审稿意见怎么写

审稿意见怎么写
审稿意见怎么写一般审稿意见至少要包含三条:(1)简要描述论文的研究内容和意
义，并作出评价。

对于其比较好的部分，要给于肯定。

(2)针对文章中的内容
和结
果，指出其具体的不足之处，并谈谈你的看法。

文章的不足之处有三种层次:
第一，
论文结果不正确或有重大失误;第二，论文缺乏重要的结果;第三，论文的结果不
够完善。

(3)最后，给出你的综合评价，接受，修改，还是拒收。

英文论文审
稿意
见汇总以下关于英文投稿过程中编辑给出的意见与大家一起分享。

12 点无轻
重主次
之分。

每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。

1、目标和结果不
清晰。

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technicalEnglish editing paying particular attention to English grammar spelling and sentence structure sothat the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解
释研究方法或解释不充分。

? In general there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.? Furthermore an explanation of why the authors
did these various experimentsshould be provided.3、对于研究设计的rationale: Also
there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大
成果/不严谨: The conclusions are overstated. For example the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对
hypothesis 的清晰界定: A hypothesis needs to be presented。

6、对某个概念或工具
使用的 rationale/定义概念: What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio7、
对研究问题的定义: Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear write one section to define the problem8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写 literature
review: The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.9、对 claim如 A
,B 的证明，verification: There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work so it isimpossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.10、严谨度问题: MNQ is easier than the primitive
PNQS how to prove that.11、格式(重视程度) :? In addition the list of references is
not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. Ihave attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples.? Before submitting a revision be sure
that your material is properly prepared and formatted. Ifyou are unsure please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under theInstructions and Forms button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.12、语言问题(出现最多的问题) :有关语
言的审稿人意见:? It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technicalEnglish editing paying particular attention to English grammar spelling and sentence structure sothat the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.? The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing service beforesubmission only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammaticaland/or spelling mistakes or are not complete sentences.? As
presented the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure verb tense and clause construction.? The English of your manuscript must be
improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English.? Please
have someone competent in the English language and the subject
matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ? the quality of English needs improving.来自编辑的鼓
励:Encouragement from reviewers:? I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has been edited because the subject is interesting.? There is
continued interest in your manuscript titled …… which you submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - Applied Biomaterials.? The Submission has
been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.。