GRE范文74

GRE官方钦定北美GRE满分范文下面是一篇GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文，我们来一起赏析，看看它为何能scored six (先读文章，再看我的点评)The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.北美GRE范文首段This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn\'t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.北美GRE作文范文中间段1The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.北美GRE范文中间段2the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.北美GRE写作范文中间段3Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.北美GRE范文末端In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。

GRE写作优秀范文汇总分享多看，多练，多仿照，写作力量才会有所提升，今日我给大家带来GRE写作优秀范文，盼望能够关心到大家，下面我就和大家共享，来观赏一下吧。

GRE写作优秀范文：权威问题GRE写作题目：Much of the information that people assume is‘factual’actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus，any piece of information referred to as a‘fact’should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不精确的。

因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应当被质疑，由于它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。

GRE写作范文：Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so，I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things，however I fundamentally take exception of the arguers assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.To begin with，the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless Iprefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno，the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for，while just a minor particle in it. Equally，no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity，the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one，and would be accepted and applied in larger range.However，what do change are the humans objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that，due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability，they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes ofcognition to disease. While at the ancient time，our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits，the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases，and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantummechanism，no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr，because their theories are based on distinct views，the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts，these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament，the conclusions we make might well be justifiable，if not completely right，to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application，instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body，they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients，of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.GRE写作优秀范文：现代摄像机和印刷术GRE写作题目：“The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records.”摄像机可以通过如此精确而有力的记录手段来再现当代生活，因此它已经代替书面记录成为了一种更重要的记录手段。

tpo74综合写作范文The reading passage states that there is a need for more people to learn about and appreciate astronomy. It starts by describing how our ancestors used to see the sky as a magical and wondrous place, and how modern technology has now enabled us to view even more of the universe, leading to breakthroughs in scientific understanding. The passage then goes on to explain how astronomy can also be enjoyed by amateurs and enthusiasts, and how it can be used to educate and inspire future generations.The listening passage provides support for the idea that astronomy can be a valuable source of education and inspiration. It offers examples of different ways in which people are currently studying and appreciating the cosmos. One such example is a university program that offers students the chance to use telescopes and conduct their own research on celestial objects. Another example provided is the work of anon-profit organization that uses the beauty of the night sky as a way of promoting interest in science and technology among disadvantaged youth.Overall, the two passages agree on the importance of astronomy as a source of education and inspiration. Both emphasize the wonder andbeauty of the cosmos, as well as the benefits that can come from increased interest and understanding. They also suggest that there are a variety of ways in which people can engage with astronomy, whether through formal education programs or non-profit initiatives. Ultimately, both passages make a strong case for why we should strive to learn more about the universe around us.。

issue34、79、146提纲：每个人对一件事都会有不同的看法。

我同意speaker的观点：进步需要持有截然不同的观点的人的讨论。

然而，我无法完全赞同这个观点。

我的赞成和反对的观点将在下面讨论。

正：我承认speaker的说法在哲学上有一定的道理。

毕竟，在科学和经济飞速发展的环境下，没有任何任务可以被一个人独立完成。

考虑到合作的需要，分享不同的观点在社会事务中扮演了越来越重要的作用。

因为一方面的观点可能是片面的和不完整的，对于一件事考虑第二方面总是好的。

通过持有不同观点的人的讨论，人们不仅可以开阔视野，还可以意识到自己观点的缺点并由此修改他们最初的决定，为了取得令人满意的进步。

在科技领域里，任何不知道缺点和错误的研究是不可能被完善的。

一个可以说明这个观点的例子是日心说和地心说。

当人们从地心说到日心说的思想转变的过程中，关于什么是宇宙中心的讨论推动了这个领域的理论的发展。

经过科学家的观察，天文学家认识到太阳也不是宇宙的中心。

直到20世纪20年代，科学家证实（太阳）只是众多星系中的一个星系的一部分。

直到今天，没有一个人，即使是最著名的科学家，可以保证某个理论是完美的。

任何科技的进步都是基于持有不同观点的人的讨论的。

没有这样的思想碰撞，人们可能会沉浸于一个所谓的完美观点里，或者一种他们已经完全了解的幻觉中，但实际上，可能只是了解了皮毛。

总之，持有不同观点的人的讨论有利于认清事务的不同方面，这是取得进步必要的、也是有益的因素。

反：截然不同的观点也可能带来新问题。

首先，与观点不同的人讨论不总能使观点更完善和更完美。

常识和经验告诉我们，不同的观点可以加剧不同派别之间的冲突。

此外，太多的观点和选择可能会使问题变得复杂，甚至超过人们理性判断的能力范围。

一个典型的例子就是人们如何对待凯恩斯经济措施这个问题上的困惑。

凯恩斯的理论一度被认为是解救那些深陷经济危机的国家的最好办法。

然而，在各种新兴经济学说提出的情况下，怎样发挥政府的宏观调控作用变得更具争议了。