The Comparison and Contrast Between TG grammar and SF grammar
- 格式:doc
- 大小:58.00 KB
- 文档页数:7
比较与对照法作文英语英文回答:The comparison and contrast essay is a common type of academic writing that requires students to analyze the similarities and differences between two or more subjects. It is a versatile form that can be used to explore a wide range of topics, from literary characters to historical events.One of the strengths of the comparison and contrast essay is its ability to clarify and deepen understanding of the subjects being compared. By identifying and examining the points of similarity and difference, students can develop a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of each subject.Additionally, the comparison and contrast essay can help students develop critical thinking and analytical skills. In order to effectively compare and contrast twosubjects, students must be able to identify and evaluate relevant criteria, weigh evidence, and draw logical conclusions.There are a few key elements that are essential to writing a strong comparison and contrast essay. First, it is important to choose subjects that are appropriate for comparison. The subjects should be sufficiently similarthat they can be meaningfully compared, but they should also be different enough to provide a basis for contrast.Second, it is important to develop a clear and focused thesis statement. The thesis statement should state the main argument of the essay and provide a roadmap for the reader.Third, it is important to organize the essay in a logical and coherent manner. The essay should flow smoothly from one point to the next, and each paragraph should support the overall thesis statement.Finally, it is important to use clear and conciselanguage. The essay should be easy to read and understand, and it should avoid unnecessary jargon or technical terms.中文回答:比较对比法作文是一种常见的学术写作类型,要求学生分析两个或多个主题之间的相似性和差异性。
Comparison and ContrastComparison and contrast are two different kinds of writing and thinking ways in my opinion and which make sense not only in passages but also in real life.In the field of writing, an excellent comparison and contrast essay requires us to analyze objects or concepts and explain the similarities or differences well between them. For example, an essay might examine how high school is like and not like college or how the causes of World War I and II were different and similar. The thesis for a comparison and contrast essay explains the essay's purpose and organization in one concise sentence. So it is very important to understand clearly the structure and topic of this kind of essay.Before discussing obvious similarities and differences of objects or concepts, we must figure out what the topic we want to come up with is and how to make essay interesting with the topic. And then, we’d Put our specific points together to create a thesis for our comparison and contrast essay. As soon as we can master above writing points and practice again and again, we will write a great passage with satisfaction.The same as essay, our normal life would get smoother with this logical thought. Especially in nowadays, information in net is multiple. Normal people can hardly recognize what the truth and fake is. If we put this thinking way to use to compare and contrast two and even more news or affairs, we’d picture a clear image in our mind and live more sanely and intelligently.Essay or life, comparison and contrast are practical and suited to use. And make it well, you will get progress in yourself as well as a fresh feeling you’ve never owned.。
跨文化议论文英语作文模板Title: Cross-Cultural Discursive Essay in English。
Introduction。
In an increasingly globalized world, the interaction between different cultures has become more frequent and important. This has led to the emergence of cross-cultural discursive essays, which aim to explore and analyze the differences and similarities between different cultures. In this essay, we will discuss the key components of a cross-cultural discursive essay in English and provide a template for writing such an essay.Understanding Culture。
Before delving into the specifics of cross-cultural discursive essays, it is important to have a clear understanding of what culture is. Culture encompasses a wide range of elements, including language, customs, traditions, beliefs, values, and social norms. These elements shape the way individuals within a particular culture think, behave, and interact with others. Understanding these cultural differences is essential for writing an effective cross-cultural discursive essay.Key Components of a Cross-Cultural Discursive Essay。
Comparison and Contrast 比较和对照的写作1.目标:掌握英语作文中比较和对照的写作方法(比较相似点,对照强调不同之处)2.使用比较和对照写作方法一般是说明文和议论文,常见的比较对照有两种方式:1.块状比较方式:(block method )先A 后B,即A1,A2,A3----; B1,B2,B3----。
2.逐点比较方式:(point-by-point method ) AB交错,即A1,B1;A2,B2;A3,B3----范文一:(块状比较法)Country life and City lifeIt is really hard to say which is better than the other,city life or rural life .Both have their merits and shortcomings .living in the city has a great many advantages .,First ,you can enjoy various kinds of foods,both foreign and domestic .Second, there are more cultural activities in the city —you can go to the concert ,the theatre ,the movies or the disco club after a day’s hard work .But city life has many problems too. The overcrowded population ,traffic jam , industrial pollution ,and the lack of understanding between people may result in disease and unhappiness .living in the country ,however ,you can watch the magnificent sunrise and sunset and listen to the bird singing in the tree. If you want ,you can certainly have a huge garden while asmall green space seems a luxury in the city .In the country ,you don’t have so much worries .You can enjoy the pleasure of work by planting seeds in the soil and watching them grow into flowers and finally into fruits or food .But rural life may not perfect .Things are going so slowly that sometimes you may feel that you are absolute left behind in some remote corners of the world .You may again miss the parties ,friends and movies in the city .Like anything else ,country life and city life have their Advantages and disadvantages .The best solution may be that you enjoy pleasure of both lives and get rid of their inconveniences.范文二:(逐点比较法)Middle School life and college LifeThere are many differences between middle school and the college .First , in the middle school , we have to listen to what the teacher says in class to understand the content of the text .But in college ,we must study by ourselves before class. If not ,we couldn’t follow the teacher .Second ,there are lots of rules in the middle school .For example , we should wear the uniform ,the girls must have their hair cut short .and we are not allowed to make boy-girl friends . However ,in college ,we have more freedom .We can wear the clothes we like .And the girls could have longbeautiful hair . We are also free to make boy or girlfriends .The third ,in the middle school ,we must study first .That means we could do nothing but study .In contrast ,we have to do everything by ourselves in college .That means we must plan our time carefully .There are also other differences between our school life and our college life .We have to learn to adapt ourselves to college life .。
高三英语完形填空七选五高级技巧与策略解析深化单选题40题1. In academic research, the results often seem contradictory at first. _____, as we dig deeper, we find hidden connections that reconcile the differences.A. HoweverB. MoreoverC. ThereforeD. Otherwise答案:A。
解析:本题考查上下文的逻辑关系。
前句说研究结果一开始看起来矛盾,后句说深入挖掘会发现能调和差异的隐藏联系,前后是转折关系。
选项A“However”表示转折,符合语境。
选项B“Moreover”表示递进,不符合句子逻辑关系。
选项C“Therefore”表示因果,这里不是因果关系。
选项D“Otherwise”表示否则,与句子逻辑不符。
2. Cultural traditions vary greatly around the world. Some cultures value collectivism highly, _____, individual achievement is emphasized in others.A. whileB. whenC. asD. because答案:A。
解析:这里考查的是对比逻辑关系。
前半句说一些文化高度重视集体主义,后半句说在其他文化中强调个人成就,两者形成对比。
选项A“while”可用于表示对比关系。
选项B“when”通常表示时间关系,不符合题意。
选项C“as”可以表示原因或时间等关系,不用于此处的对比。
选项D“because”表示原因,与句子逻辑不符。
3. When reading a complex philosophical article, we may encounter unfamiliar concepts. _____, it is essential to refer to relevant materials for better understanding.A. ConsequentlyB. InsteadC. NeverthelessD. Besides答案:A。
表示比较的两个词comparison & contrast的区别首先看看这两个词的含义comparison - When you compare things, you consider them and discover the difference or similarity between them.compare更侧重于比较事物间的共同点,发现他们不同的地方。
e.g. Compare with dogs, cats are cleaner. 猫比狗干净。
猫和狗都干净,比较而言猫更加干净。
就干净这一点,它们是有共同点的。
contrast - A contrast is a great difference between two or more things which is clear when you compare them.contrast更侧重于比较不同点e.g. Cats catch mice, by contrast, dogs don't. 猫捉老鼠,但是狗不捉老鼠。
这一点上,猫和狗大不相同。
很多时候,这两者可以连起来用。
请看在网上找到的这个例句e.g. Please compare and contrast education in China and America. 请对中国和美国的教育系统做一下对比。
即相同点和不同点都做对比。
总的来说,compare是比较同类事物,而contrast是比较不同类的事物。
换句话说compare 侧重的是相同点的比较,而contrast侧重的是不同点的比较。
很多时候,这两者可以连用,表示对照比较。
Comparison: in comparison, in comparison with, also, similarly, likewise etc.This book is funny and easy to understand in comparison.Judging from your recent information, it seems that your market conditions have not been favorable in comparison with other markets.Those who feel frigid towards their neighbors are mostly the working people. By comparison, retirees and housewives are more sociable, as they spend more time about the housing estates. You’ll have to get a passport, and you’ll also need a visa.Men wear a jacket and tie; similarly, women wear a skirt or dress.Pleased to meet you. Likewise.Contrast: in contrast to, by contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand, instead of, rather than, however, unlike, though, conversely etc.In contrast to your belief that the project will fail; I’m confident that it will succeed.The coastal areas have mild winters, but by contrast the central plains are extremely cold.The older a male is , the more valuable he is and the younger a female is, the costlier she is . The older a male is , the more valuable he is while a female is on the contrary.My job is not well paid, but on the other hand I don’t have to work long hours.I can go to the meeting instead of my sick brother.You take his advice rather than my suggestion.However rich people are,they always seem anxious to take more money.Unlike last year, the company has made big profits this year.The essay is all right; there is room for improvement, though.Everybody suggest him to do a teacher, but he didn’t choose that career conversely.however和whatever引导从句时的用法However的用法主要有以下两点:(一)用作连接副词,相当于no matter how,引导让步状语从句,意思是“不管怎样……”“无论如何……”,具体结构有以下两种:1.however+形容词+主语+系动词,例:However rich people are,they always seem anxious to take more money.无论人们有多富裕,他们似乎总是渴望挣到更多的钱。
四级对比观点类型英语作文Here is an essay with more than 1000 words on the topic of "Comparison and Contrast Essay":One of the most common and effective types of academic essays is the comparison and contrast essay. This essay type allows writers to explore the similarities and differences between two or more subjects, ideas, or concepts. By carefully analyzing the comparative elements, writers can gain a deeper understanding of the topics and present their findings in a clear and organized manner. The comparison and contrast essay format is a valuable tool for both students and professionals, as it enables them to effectively communicate their ideas and insights.When writing a comparison and contrast essay, it is crucial to establish a clear basis for the comparison. This means identifying the specific aspects or characteristics of the subjects that will be examined. For example, if the essay is comparing two different types of transportation, the writer may choose to focus on factors such as cost, efficiency, environmental impact, and convenience. By establishing a clear basis for the comparison, the writer can ensure that the essay is focused and coherent.Another important aspect of the comparison and contrast essay is the use of organizational strategies. There are several common approaches that writers can use to structure their essays, including the block method and the point-by-point method. The block method involves discussing one subject in its entirety, followed by a discussion of the other subject. This approach can be effective when the subjects being compared are quite different or have a significant number of unique characteristics. The point-by-point method, on the other hand, involves alternating between the subjects, discussing a specific aspect or characteristic of each in turn. This approach can be effective when the subjects being compared have a high degree of similarity or when the writer wants to highlight the specific points of comparison or contrast.Regardless of the organizational approach chosen, the comparison and contrast essay should be structured in a clear and logical manner. The introduction should provide an overview of the essay's purpose and the subjects being compared, while the body paragraphs should present the specific points of comparison or contrast. The conclusion should then synthesize the information presented and draw a final conclusion or recommendation.One of the key benefits of the comparison and contrast essay is its ability to facilitate critical thinking and analysis. By examining thesimilarities and differences between two or more subjects, writers are forced to engage in a deeper level of analysis and evaluation. This process can lead to a better understanding of the topics at hand, as well as the development of critical thinking skills that can be applied to a wide range of academic and professional contexts.Additionally, the comparison and contrast essay can be a valuable tool for persuasive writing. By highlighting the key differences between two subjects, writers can make a compelling case for the superiority of one over the other. This can be particularly useful in fields such as business, marketing, or public policy, where the ability to effectively communicate and argue for a particular position is essential.Overall, the comparison and contrast essay is a versatile and valuable form of academic writing. Whether used for analytical, persuasive, or informative purposes, this essay type allows writers to effectively communicate their ideas and insights, while also developing critical thinking and communication skills that are essential for success in a wide range of academic and professional contexts.。
关于东方与西方道德价值观英语作文The Comparison of Moral Values between East and WestIntroductionMoral values are the principles and beliefs that guide our behavior and decision-making. They are deeply rooted in culture, tradition, religion, and philosophy. The comparison of moral values between the East and West reveals fascinating insights into the differences and similarities in the core values that shape these societies.The EastEastern cultures, such as those found in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, are often characterized by a collectivist mindset, a strong emphasis on harmony, respect for authority, and a belief in fate and destiny. In these societies, the group is prioritized over the individual, and social harmony is crucial for maintaining stability and order.One of the key moral values in Eastern cultures is filial piety, which is the respect and honor that children owe their parents. This principle underscores the importance of family and the intergenerational bond that shapes social relationships. Additionally, Eastern cultures often value humility, modesty, andself-restraint as virtues that promote harmony and cooperation within the community.In terms of ethics, Eastern philosophies such as Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism emphasize the importance of moral cultivation, self-discipline, and finding balance in one's life. These traditions place a strong emphasis on compassion, empathy, and mindfulness as essential qualities for living a virtuous and meaningful life.The WestWestern cultures, found in Europe and the Americas, are characterized by individualism, independence, and a focus on personal achievement and autonomy. In these societies, the individual's rights and freedoms are highly valued, and there is a strong emphasis on personal responsibility andself-determination.One of the central moral values in Western cultures is the concept of individual rights and freedoms, which are enshrined in democratic societies as fundamental principles of governance and citizenship. Concepts such as human rights, equality, and justice form the ethical foundation of Western moral values, emphasizing the importance of treating all individuals with dignity and respect.Western ethics, influenced by Judeo-Christian traditions and Enlightenment philosophy, emphasize concepts such as justice, fairness, and the rule of law as guiding principles for ethical behavior and moral decision-making. The emphasis on individual autonomy, personal choice, and self-expression is also a defining feature of Western moral values.Comparison and ContrastThe comparison of moral values between the East and West reveals both similarities and differences in the core values that shape these societies. While Eastern cultures emphasize collectivism, social harmony, and filial piety, Western cultures prioritize individualism, personal freedom, and human rights.Despite these differences, there are also areas of overlap and shared values between Eastern and Western moral traditions. Both cultures value virtues such as compassion, integrity, honesty, and respect for others as essential qualities for ethical living. Concepts such as justice, fairness, and the rule of law are also universal principles that guide moral behavior in both Eastern and Western societies.ConclusionIn conclusion, the comparison of moral values between the East and West highlights the rich diversity and complexity of human ethics and values. While Eastern and Western cultures may differ in their emphasis on collectivism versus individualism, social harmony versus personal freedom, and filial piety versus human rights, both traditions share common values such as compassion, integrity, and justice.By exploring the similarities and differences in moral values between the East and West, we can gain a deeper understanding of the principles and beliefs that shape our behavior and guide our decision-making. Ultimately, the comparison of moral values between different cultures enriches our appreciation for the diverse ethical perspectives that contribute to the richness and complexity of human society.。
Unit One Ways of LearningTeaching Objectives of this Unit:Students will be able to:1.grasp the main idea (that it would be ideal if we can strike a balance between the Chinese andthe Western learning styles) and structure of the text (introduction of the topic by an anecdote―elaboration by comparison and contrast― conclusion by a suggestion);2.appreciate the difference between comparison and contrast, as well as different ways to compareand contrast (point-by-point method or one-side-at-a-time method);3.master the key language points and grammatical structures in the text;4.conduct a series of reading, listening, speaking and writing activities related to the theme of thisunit.Previewing Tasks:T asks Ss to:1.get familiar with the following important words and expressions in Text A, which will enablethem to understand the text better: attach, initial, occasion, neglect, relevant, accomplish, in due course, make up for, continual, evolve, emerge, superior;2.pre-read Text A and try to find out the differences in education between China and America. Ssare also encouraged to collect more information on this issue from some after-class materials; 3.finish the comprehension questions for text organization on p. 10 of the textbook.First Period(90minutes)I. Cultural Notes:(1) Middle-class American: the old urban middle class consisted mainly of white collar workers and owners of the family businesses and their employees. They focused the majority of the middle class before 1945. The new middle class emerged out of the ashes of wartime destruction and consisted of salaried workers, blue collar, white collar, store clerks, shop keepers, regardless of the line of business they were in, all joined the ranks of the new middle-class which is between the very wealthy class and the class of unskilled laborers and unemployed people.(2) Standing on the shoulders of giants: a well-known phrase frequently employed by inventors to express modesty about their achievements. The suggestion is that while they have been able to see further than those who came before them, it is not because they themselves are intellectual giants. Rather it is because they have been able to build upon the accumulated discoveries of their great predecessors.II. A discussion for leading to Text A:1. If you find a two-year-old boy is trying to put a key into a box, will you help him immediately?---- Of course. He is too small to know how to do it---- No. let him do it and learn by trying.2.Can you recall how your parents taught you in your childhood? Did they like to teach you by holding your hand?---- (stories in their childhood)----Yes, I like it. I knew nothing as a little child and their help could give me a convenient way to achieve what I wanted.---- No, I don’t like it. Doing by myself could help me to grasp the things tightly.3. Which way did you prefer when you were in trouble with one of your toys in your childhood, turning to your parents for help, or exploring by yourselves?---- turning to my parents for help, because I was too young to know how to manage it.---- exploring by myself, like Kevin in Home Alone.4.Can you list some features of education in China based on the above discussions? Can youIn a broad sense, education is a kind of cultural phenomenon. Therefore, when we compare Sino-American education systems, it is indispensable to investigate the two cultures first, for it is the different cultures that lead to the differences in education. Knowing that, on the one hand, the core of Chinese education, though in varied forms, is given to the accumulation of knowledge and the construction of learning system and the aim of education is in molding, while on the American side, priority is given to fostering student’s ability to make practical application of knowledge learnt and boldness in innovations, creativity, originality, and the aim of its education is in perfection of his/her personality for the future happiness, you’ll find it is not hard to understand such common occurrences in text A or in daily life as why many Chinese staff would like to assist Benjamin to insert the key into the slot.III. Text Organization (exercise on P. 10):An essay is usually made up of three parts: a beginning where the topic is introduced; the body part where the topic is elaborated on, and a conclusion. This text is no exception:Part one: (Para.1—5) Topic introduced by an anecdote of teaching a child to insert a key into a slot. Part two: (Para.6—12) The differences in education between China and America.Point 1: Two different ways to learn to accomplish a task (Para.6—10)Point 2: Two different attitudes to creativity and skills (Para 11—12)Part three: (Para. 13—14) Conclusion: The author suggests that we might strike a better balance between the two contrary ways of education.(Teachers can draw the following chart on the blackboard to help the students be clear of the structure of Text A :)Chinese way↗↘Incident →→→difference in education →→→ conclusion↘American way ↗IV. Study in detail:Part one (Para. 1-5):1.Skimming: T asks Ss to skim this part and then answer the following questions:① Where and when did the incident take place? (Jinling Hotel in Nanjing, spring 1987)② Who are the main characters in this incident? (The author, his wife Ellen, their son Benjamin and the hotel staff)③ What is the attitude of the author and his wife towards Benjamin’s efforts in inserting the key into the slot? (They let him explore and enjoy himself)④ What is the attitude of the hotel staff toward Benjamin’s efforts? (They held his hand and taught him how to insert the key correctly)2. Language points in this part:1) reflect on: think deeply about, remind oneself of, considerI need time to reflect on your offer.2) attach: fasten or joinThe porter attached a label to my suitcase.She was strongly attached to her home.3)…to position the key just so:to position the key carefully to fit into the narrow key slot4) not in the least: not at allAnn didn't seem in the least concerned about her study5) on occasion: now and thenSteve spent almost all his time doing his research, but, on occasion, he would take his son to see a film.6) relevant: directly connected with the subject (followed by to, opposite irrelevant)Be related to / be associated with / be connected with / be concerned with7)assist: help (used in the pattern: assist sb. to do sth. , assist sb. with sth. )The head teacher’s deputy assists with many of his duties.3. T tells Ss that there are many ways of introducing a topic: ① to state the topic directly; ② to introduce the topic by posing a question (e.g. Text A, Unit 6, Book1: What Animals Really Think?);③to begin by quoting newspaper headlines (e.g. Text B, Unit 3, Book 1: How to Make Sense out of Science); ④an anecdote or an incident is used. Ss should decide which way is adopted by Howard Gardner, and T should drive home to them the very important point that they should learn to vary their own writing by adopting various types of topic introduction.V. Assignments:1. read the left two parts of text A in detail, pick out the sentences that can not easily understand.2. finish exercise 2 on P. 11, so as to get a better understanding of the differences in approaches to learning between the Chinese and Americans.Second Period (90minutes)I. Dictation:In a broad sense, education is a kind of cultural phenomenon. Therefore, when we compare Sino-America education systems, it is necessary to investigate the two cultures first, for it is the different cultures that lead to the difference in education. The Chinese give great priority to showing a child how to accomplish a task; In contrast, the Americans attach much importance to fostering students’ ability to make practical application of the knowledge and to encouraging them to be bold in innovation, creativity and originality.II. Part two:1. T asks Ss to scan this part quickly and then try to figure out the structure of this part:Para. 6-7: different explanations of the Chinese and the Americans for helping the children(Chinese: accomplish the task sooner, and they can proceed to more complex activities; Americans: self-reliance is a principle value of child rearing in middle-class American.)Para. 8-10: two different ways to learn.Para. 11-12: two different attitudes towards creativity and skills.2. T guides Ss to further discuss the differences in detail (check of assignment No.2):In this part, the author just gives his own thoughts on different approaches to leaning in China and the West based on the anecdote mentioned in the first part. Ss are supposed to sum up the differences in approaches to learning between the Chinese and Americans, including the two different ways to learn and two different attitudes towards creativity and skills as suggested by thecontrast (a comparison brings out the similarities between two or more things of the same kind, while a contrast the differences between them).3. T further explains to Ss that there are generally two ways to organize comparison and contrast in essays. One way is to examine one subject thoroughly and then start the other (one-side-at-a-time method), and the other way is to examine two subjects at the same time, discussing them point by point (point-by-point method). Then T asks Ss to scan Para. 6-7 and Para.11-13 respectively and decide what method of comparison and contrast are used here (one-side-at-a-time method for Para. 6-7 and point-by-point method for Para.11-13).4. Language points in this part:1) accomplish: manage to do (sth.)Unless you practice you’ll accomplish nothing.2) continual: describing separate actions which are repeated over a period of time.Recently the young couple have continual arguments with each other for trifles.continuous: indicating that an action carries on without stopping or interruptionA continuous beach is exposed to the beating of continual waves.3) apply: ① be relevant; have an effect ( used in the pattern apply to sb/sth)The principle of diligence applies to all undergoing② write a letter or fill in a form in order to ask formally for sth. (used in the pattern: apply for sth.. apply to do sth.)4) evolve: (cause to) develop gradually ;( used in the pattern evolve into, evolve from)The story evolves into a tragedy.Popular music evolves from folk songs.5) emerge: come out (followed by from)Emergence, n.出现emergency, n. 紧急情况,不测事件,非常时刻6) Sentences:① He may well get frustrated and angry. (line 39)may或might与well连用,表示有充分的理由,完全(能),(满)可以。
The Comparison and Contrast Between Transformational-Generative Grammar and Systemic Functional Grammar天津商业大学滕薇In linguistics, a transformational-generative grammar (TG grammar), also known as the universal grammar, is a theory that suggests there are properties that all possible natural human languages have. In the late 1950s, a new theory appeared in America and violently punched the prevailing structural descriptive linguistics. The founder of this new theory was A. N. Chomsky (1928 - ). Affected by Bloomfield, one of the representatives of American structuralism, Chomsky tried to open up a new route when he found that the classification of structural elements of language according to distribution and arrangement had its limitations. (Hu 2003) From this perspective of consideration, Chomsky gradually established the well-known transformational- generative grammar. Generally speaking, TG grammar is to view language as an abstract set of generalized rules detached from any particular context of use.In contrast, systemic functional grammar (SF grammar) or systemic functional linguistics (SFL) is a grammatical description developed by M. A. K. Halliday (1925 - ). It was developed as the result of inheritance and borrowing of predecessors‟achievements, such as Saussure, Malinowski, J.R. Firth and the American anthropological linguists Boas, Sapir and Whorf. Systemic functional grammar is concerned with how people use language and how language is structured for use. That is to say, functional grammar is based on a view of how language functions as a system of human communication, but not as rules. It sets out to investigate what the range of relevant choices are, both in the kinds of meaning that we want to express (or functions that we might want to perform) and in the kinds of wordings that we can use to express these meanings; and to match these two sets of choices.(Thompson: 8)However, language users may have a quite different point of view from the linguistic scientists. Since the primary function of language is communication, we must doubt that which theory is more applicable when users actually produce or understand language. It is widely believed that, in the kind of society we live in, context is an important element we have to take into consideration in language study for the moment we understand the human language. And thus we admit that systemic functional grammar is more developed from TG grammar and has more advantages that can help us use language, understand meanings and analyze discourses. In my opinion, there are at least seven differences between systemic functional grammar and TG grammar as follows.Firstly, TG grammar is the most fully developed and influential version of linguistics through form, while systemic functional grammar is the study of language through meaning (i.e. its function).Chomsky insisted that linguistics should go beyond merely describing syntacticstructures, and aim to explain why language is structured in the way it is – which includes explaining why other kinds of structures are not found.(Thompson: 2) TG grammar solves the long unsolved question of traditional grammar: the transformation process from active tense sentence to passive one. He thought that syntax is the center of linguistic study which consists of surface structure (表层结构) and deep structure (深层结构). The surface structure is the kind of sentence we ordinarily say, while the deep structure is an abstract syntactic representation of sentence from which its surface structure generates. Chomsky also put forward two important concepts: competence (语言能力) and performance(语言操作) in his Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The former refers to a language user‟s underlying knowledge about the systems of rules, and the latter the actual use of language in concrete situations. However, only under the idealization of the speaker-hearer is performance a direct reflection of competence, but not in actual fact. For TG grammar, linguist‟s task is primarily to describe competence because performance is impossible without competence. This kind of dualistic language thought made Chomsky fully concentrate on competence and completely neglect performance. But, to Halliday, it‟s more significant to describe actual sentences with many functions not the idealized deep structure. He was concerned with the function of the sentence, what the writer‟s purpose is in writing the sentence – in other words, with the meaning.(Thompson: 2) If we take meaning as being the sum of what the speaker wants the hearer to understand – that is to say, if we equate the meaning of a sentence with its function – then understanding how the present message fits in its context is clearly part of the meaning.(Thompson: 7) Language serves three major functions as the metafunction (元功能): the ideational (概念功能), the interpersonal (人际功能) and the textual functions (语篇功能). The ideational function is to convey new information, to communicate a context that is unknown to the hearer. The interpersonal function embodies all uses of language to express social and personal relations. This includes the various ways the speaker enters a speech situation and performs a speech art. The textual function refers to the fact that language has mechanisms to make any stretch of spoken or written discourse into a coherent and unified text and make a living passage different from a random list sentences.(Hu 2003) However, any full analysis of the sentence will inevitably need to take account of both the meaning and the form (and of the links between them).(Thompson: 2)To summarize, Chomsky characterized form independently of meaning and function, while Halliday had good reasons to believe that meaning and function can help shape form. Both these approaches in linguistics have their advantages and disadvantages and they can interact with each other complementarily. In fact, both of them represent the two directions of linguistic studies at present: the vertical study of language in relation to thought and logic and the horizontal study of language with the social cultural framework. With both of them combined, we will have a full and complete view of language.Secondly,TG grammar is an abstract set of generalized rules, while systemic functional grammar concentrates on context-dependent use.In the second half of the last century, there built up an immensely influential view of what the study of language should involve that insists that there is only one proper place to start –from a view of language as an abstract set of generalized rules detached from any particular context of use.(Thompson: 1) This view, as we know today, is the TG grammar. Chomsky, the pioneer of TG grammar, argued that it was essential to make language description absolutely explicit. (Thompson: 3) TG grammar is just like computers that provide the driving metaphor behind the approach because instructions to computers have to be explicit and unambiguous. Therefore, TG sets out to provide rules of this kind for the formation of grammatically correct sentences. (Thompson: 3) TG grammars merely studies the sentences that obey the rules of grammar. The meaning of sentence is manifested by its deep structure and the form of sentence by its surface structure. TG studies the relationship between the deep structure and the surface structure, the generation of grammatically correct sentences and transformational rules.Halliday held a different opinion that he suggested the primary function of language is communicating meanings in particular contexts. Linguists should study the language actually in use, not in imaginary so-called language ideal structure. Moreover, language in use includes both the spoken language and written language; both the regular rules of grammar and the irregular rules that can be understood and accepted. He considered language is a social semiotic which consists of field (语场), tenor (基调) and mode(方式). Language as social semiotic must be studied in social context. Functionalists choose meaning as objective of linguistic studies, which is closely linked to the world, so they focus on the relation between language and the world, thought and culture.Thirdly, TG grammar takes linguistics towards biology, while systemic functional grammar takes it towards sociology.In TG grammar, the fact that we as language users can handle the complex relations between Subjects and sentences, that is, we can identify the separate constituents in the sentence and assign them to their correct place in the structure of the appropriate Subject, tells us a great deal about how our brains must work. At the same time, the fact that we do not need to be explicitly taught how to do this means that we must in some way be born with the required mental capacities. Thus a rigorously formal approach to the description of language leads us towards neurology and genetics. (Thompson: 6) According to Chomsky, language is the preliminary state of language faculty existing in human mind and brain and a mental organ. It is a natural and innate object just like human heart or lung. Structuralists think children learn language through “stimulus and response”. However Chomsky found (Hu 2003): firstly, children learn their native language very fast and with little effort. Secondly, however different their linguistic environments are, they follow more or less the same stages in acquisition:the babbling stage (咿呀学语阶段), nonsense world stage (胡言乱语阶段), holophrastic stage (单词句阶段), two-word utterance (双词句阶段), developing grammar (语法发展阶段), near-adult grammar (类成人语法阶段), and full competence (成熟阶段). Thirdly, the child learns the total grammar of the languageduring a limited period time, from limited exposure to speech. Fourthly, it‟s quite easy for children of five to six years old to learn their mother tongue, but it‟s rather difficult to learn other subjects such as mathematics and physics and so on. Based on the above observations, he put forward “Innateness Hypothesis” which opposes against theory of “stimulus and response”and means that children are born with what he called Language Acquisition Device (LAD) (语言习得机制),which is species character.Different from Chomsky‟s views about the nature of language, Halliday considered language should be taken sociology and must be studied in social context. The systemic functional linguistics is a study of relevant features in the culture and society that form the context in which language is used, and which are at the same time constructed by the way in which language is used. (Thompson: 10) He does not believe that human beings are born with LAD but insists that human are capable of learning language as well as any other skills. And they are learning through the use of it to satisfy their own needs and to communicate with others. As the demonstration above shows, Halliday studied children‟s language acquisition from the point of function through sociology, while Chomsky studied it from the point of form through psychology and science. And the differences between “psychology”and “sociology”are also reflected by the study of adult language. Chomsky inclined to study language from the point of intra-organism and emphasized the role of brain and mind in language, while Halliday advocated that linguistics should study languages from the point of inter-organism, and emphasized the influence of social context to language.Of course, in both the two linguistics, we need to take into account the constraints of the “raw materials”: the pre-determined (genetic) characteristics of the human brain that allow or encourage certain kinds of language forms, and disallow or discourage other kinds. (Thompson: 7)In addition, both approaches, through form and meaning, ask essentially the same question about language: how can we explain why language has the main features that it does? But, whereas the form-based approach finds the answer in the way our brains are structured, the meaning-based approach finds it in the way our social context is structured. (Thompson: 10)Fourthly, TG grammar is a kind of transformational generative grammar, while systemic functional grammar is based on a kind of reflexivity –“construe”.By a generative grammar, Chomsky simply means “a system of rules that in some explicit and well-defined way assigns structural descriptions to sentences”. He believed that “every speaker of a language has mastered and internalized a generative grammar that expresses his knowledge of his language.”(Hu 2003:327)“Thus a generative grammar attempts to specify what the speaker actually knows, not what he may report about his knowledge”(Chomsky, 1965: 8). Chomsky inclined that it is necessary to work out a grammar that, with a finite set of rules, can generate all the grammatical sentences in a language without generating a single non-grammatical sentence. (Hu 2003: 329)In his Syntactic Structures,Chomsky listed sixteen transformational rules for English and he has distinguished transformational rules into two kinds: obligatory (强制性) and optional (选择性). The transformation of auxiliaries and particles are obligatory, and the transformation of negation, the passive voice, etc. are optional. (Hu 2003: 331)One important implication of the functional view of language is that context and language are interdependent. On one hand, language could be seen as dependent on context, for example, when the speaker is in an informal context, he is likely to use informal language. On the other hand, the use of informal language also contributes to creating the informal context. We use the term …construe‟ to talk about this kind of reflexivity. (Thompson: 9) Halliday paid more attention on the wordings than meanings for the reason that it is wordings that we can use to express the meanings. The wording construes context and it simultaneously reflects and constructs the context. At a broader level, our experiences in the world clearly influence what we normally talk about and the way we talk about it. Meanwhile, the way we normally talk about these experiences influences the way we see them.Fifthly, in systemic functional grammar, there is a special term …choice‟, while TG grammar has no choice because it is viewed as a set of rules detached from language use.From the point of view of systemic functional grammar, if we want to examine what a piece of language is intended to (i.e. its function), we cannot avoid thinking in terms of choice. Systemic functional grammar sets out to investigate what the range of relevant choices are, both in the kinds of meanings and in the kinds of wordings; and to match these two sets of choices. (Thompson: 8) Though not usually made explicit, there is always the idea of choice: that there are potentially identifiable reasons why the writer is expressing the message in this particular way rather than in other possible ways. (Thompson: 2) In order to identify meaning choices, we have to look outwards at the context. At the same time, we need to identify the linguistic options (i.e. the lexical and structural possibilities that the language system offers for use), and to explore the meanings that each option expresses. These are complementary perspectives on the same phenomenon, one, as it were there, from the bottom up – from wording to context – and the other from the top down – from context to wording. Note that the use of the term …choice‟ does not necessarily imply a conscious process of selection by the speaker: what we aim to uncover through a functional analysis are the reasons why the speaker produces a particular wording rather than any other in a particular context. (Thompson: 9)For example, Halliday once observed a child named Nigel in detail. He found there were two characteristics in children‟s language: systemic and functional features, that is to say children utter some sound systemically in order to achieve some goals. He concluded that seven functions are performed in children‟s language, and they are: instrumental (工具功能), regulatory (控制功能), interactional (交互功能), personal (个人功能), heuristic (启发功能), imaginative functions (想象功能) and informative function (信息功能). Children learn to express their ideas concerning the above functions and in the learning process they acquire a set of “meaning potential”. Every function includes a group of choices of meanings. Atthe beginning stage, the choice of meaning are limited, with children‟s successful use of language, the number of choices increases. When children achieve their goals through uttering some sounds, their desire of learning more meanings and functions are strengthened. By formulating our approach to linguistic description in the kind of terms used above –choices among relevant options in context –we are deliberately opening up the path towards grammatically based text analysis: at each stage, we can ask why the writer of speaker is expressing this particular meaning in this particular way at this particular point. (Thompson: 10) The language choice system provides a number of choices of wording and structure. The object of language choice is regarded as grammatical rules in functional linguistics. While studying the choices that are applied to meaning or function, Halliday established the systemic functional grammar, consisting of the ideational, the interpersonal and the textual functions. (田海龙,张迈曾外语学刊2007,6)The last but not the least, TG grammar sets out to study language completely isolated from language use, focusing on propositional meaning, while systemic functional grammar applies to language use, emphasizing functional meaning.TG grammar is almost exclusively interested in what we can call …propositional meaning‟, that is, the …content‟of the sentence. If two sentences have exactly the propositional content and have no difference in surface form, they can be regarded as the same. Chomsky made a decision to study language isolated from the context so that the aim is to discover the rules which govern how constituents can be put together to form grammatically correct sentences, and to arrange these rules in a general way; therefore each sentence is analyzed in complete isolation, both from other sentences and from the situation in which it might be used. (Thompson: 5) Rather than the basic use of language is for thought in fact the logic of Chomsky, systemic functional grammar lies in language for communication with other people. SF grammar is based on two facts: firstly, language users are actually making choices in a system of systems and trying to realize different semantic functions in social interaction; secondly, language is inseparable from social activities of man. Thus, it takes actual uses of language as the object of study.It must be added that, TG grammar is also known as the universal grammar (UG) because a transformational-generative grammar is not limited to particular languages, but to reveal the unity of particular grammars and universal grammars. It does not describe one language as an end, but as a means to explore the universal rules in the hope if revealing human cognitive systems and the essential nature of human beings. (Hu 2003: 328) TG grammar sets out to formulate an abstract set of generalized rules in as general a way as possible, ideally, so that they apply to all human language rather than just individual languages. (Thompson: 5) From this perspective, systemic functional grammar couldn‟t be called a universal grammar, but it is still a more applicable and practical grammar for language use.To summarize, transformational-generative linguistics and systemic functional linguistics are two influential but quite contrasting approaches to linguistic study and reflect the two trends in linguistics development, provide a innovative valueand important significance. TG grammar belongs to formalism which considers language and languages independently of other activities of communication, while systemic functional grammar inherits from functionalism which emphasizes that language are manifested in complex human activities closed linked with social interaction. They both play an important role in language teaching and learning.。