十二怒汉英文赏析

12怒汉英文观后感《12怒汉》（12 Angry Men）是一部由西德尼·吕美特执导的美国电影，于1957年上映。

该片改编自雷吉纳德·罗斯的同名剧本，讲述了一个陪审团的故事，这个陪审团试着在一个年轻男子被指控谋杀的案件中作出裁决。

作为一部充满紧张与悬疑的法庭电影，它在审判和正义主题上引起了广泛的讨论和思考。

影片开场时，我们的视线直接聚焦于一间陪审室里的12位陪审员。

刚开始时，每个角色都是标准的陪审员模型：白人中产阶级，年龄普遍大于40岁，而且大多数对被告有偏见，自信地认为他有罪。

在接下来的90分钟里，导演通过细致入微的角色和情节塑造，展示了一个智慧与敏锐相互碰撞而又和谐融合的过程。

随着陪审员们开始讨论案件的证据和细节，影片逐渐展现出人性的各个方面。

每个角色代表了不同的观点和价值观，他们之间的对话和辩论让观众有机会思考案件的主观性和客观性。

这个过程中，每个陪审员都表现出了不同程度的成长和变化。

他们需要超越自己的偏见、情绪和个人经验，尝试对案件进行客观公正的评判。

在这部电影中，我们看到了勇敢、坚定和正直的陪审员，他们在自己的立场和执着中对案件进行了深入的研究。

他们不追随众声喧哗，不受困扰于陪审团内部的冲突，而是秉持着对事实真相的追求。

与此同时，我们也看到了不愿改变和顽固的陪审员，他们固执己见，甚至不愿意倾听其他陪审员的论据。

这部电影揭示了人类的情感和个人背景对决策过程的影响。

陪审团成员们纷纷带入过往的背景和经历，这使得他们对案件的评判不可避免地受到主观色彩的影响。

这让观众反思了当我们扮演陪审员时我们是否能够摆脱个人情感和成见，以客观的眼光去审视案件。

除了对案件本身的审判，这部电影还触及到了社会和人性的广泛议题。

例如，影片中有一个角色对被告的种族做出了偏见的评论。

这引发了对种族歧视和偏见的讨论。

这部电影也展示了少数人坚信自己正确的勇气和坚韧，即使面对多数人的不同看法，也能够勇敢地发声。

12怒汉的英文观后感12怒汉是一部以法庭为背景的经典电影，通过展现12位陪审团成员之间的辩论和思维碰撞，揭示了人性的复杂性和法律正义的主题。

观后感是对影片的思考和感悟，以下是我对12怒汉的英文观后感。

The movie "12 Angry Men" is a timeless classic that explores the dynamics within a jury room during a court trial. Through intense discussions and clashes of opinions, the film delves into the complexity of human nature and raises questions about the nature of justice. After watching this thought-provoking film, I was left with a myriad of emotions and reflections.First and foremost, the film reminds us of the essential importance of critical thinking and open-mindedness. The twelve jurors enter the room with their own biases and preconceived notions about the accused. As the deliberations progress, we witness how some jurors allow their personal emotions or prejudices to cloud their judgment, while others carefully examine the evidence and challenge the established consensus.The film also raises questions about the flaws in the justice system. It highlights how easily a person's fate can be determined by the subjective opinions of a group of individuals, each with their own personal baggage. The power dynamics within the jury room become apparent as the lone dissenting juror fights against the initial majority. It serves as a reminder that justice can sometimes be swayed by personal motivations and external pressures, leaving room for potential miscarriages of justice.What struck me the most about the film is its exploration of human nature. Each character represents a different facet of society, demonstrating the complexities of human behavior and the various factors that shape our perspectives. From the strength of personal conviction to the vulnerability of conformity, the film portrays a fascinating spectrum of human emotions and motivations.The film also shines a light on the power of persuasion and effective communication. As the jurors engage in heated debates, we witness the power of compelling arguments, as well as the importance of presenting evidence and fostering an environment conducive to dialogue. It is a testament to the influence that one individual can have on a group, conveying the significance of logical reasoning and persuasive skills.Furthermore, "12 Angry Men" explores themes of empathy and compassion. As the jurors reevaluate the evidence presented during the trial, they begin to understand the significance of the accused's background and the potential biases that may have been at play. This realization prompts a shift in their perspectives and a deeper understanding of the impact their decisions will have on the accused's life. The film serves as a reminder to look beyond surface-level judgments and consider the broader implications of our actions.In terms of the film's structure, its confined setting within the jury room enhances the sense of tension and emotional intensity. The cinematography brilliantly captures the dynamics between the jurors, with close-ups highlighting their facial expressions and body language, revealing the inner turmoil and conflicts they face. The gradual change in lighting and use ofvisual cues subtly mirror the evolving emotions and shifting power dynamics.Overall, "12 Angry Men" is a masterpiece that continues to captivate audiences with its timeless themes and thought-provoking storytelling. The film's exploration of human nature and the flaws within the justice system offer valuable insights into the complexities of society. It serves as a reminder to question our own biases and to approach critical decision-making with an open mind. Ultimately, "12 Angry Men" is a powerful reminder of the importance of justice, empathy, and the potential for individual transformation.。

十二怒汉观后感英文版在1957年由悉尼．卢曼特执导的《十二怒汉》是探讨美国陪审员制度和法律正义的经典作，本片则是由威廉．弗里德金重新拍摄的电视版，由杰克．莱蒙取代亨利．方达演男主角，其他合演者包括金像奖影帝乔治．C．斯科特。

下面是英文版的《十二怒汉》观后感，欢迎阅读。

十二怒汉观后感英文版As a IMDB movie, originally only read and when the university language class fuzzy again writing film is a very extravagant things, but this afternoon again like a completely blew my mind, giving too many surprises and things will still lead a person to endless aftertastes, on the next.Talk before seen a movie, called the man from Earth (the man from the earth), features a proposed very beautiful view or treason and heresy, by constantly review and logical scrutiny to details of other people's point of view in the opposite direction. The point is that the language of art and clever reasoning, give people the feeling of layers of peeling cocoon. This 12 anger is more in-depth study of human nature and the United States judicial and democratic system.Originally seemingly incontrovertible casebecause the jury has an objection, so an amazing negotiations began. The opposition is a smooth and logical architect, and a producer of the film. The first round of the debate is mainly composed of a It's possible! That led, the boy may be innocent, the witness may be wrong, false testimony could, to a 18 year old boy without thinking directly to the electric chair is a be brutal and inhuman. At this stage, the only point against the success of Davis is to let people get away from the surface of the evidence and their own prejudices, with careful scrutiny of the details of the mind, for the next stage to lay the foundation.In the details of reasoning, Davis has been a breakthrough point and support the knife, when out of pocket knife with almost the same knife, all surprised sound jump, so the evidence will lose credibility, on the knife in the back again to become a breakthrough point. Davis proposed to reproduce the boy murder scenes, so that the boy insisted that the guilty get Davis for demonstration, higher than their own people, manipulation is holding a knife stabbed in the chest from the top down, and from a slum, have seen a lot ofpeople stand up and fight to get stressed such adjustment method, it is a waste of time the tool, familiar boy didn't like this.To discuss the progress on many of the details in advance, such as time difference; the old man can walk out of the bedroom, through the corridor in 15 seconds, the boy rushed out to see the woman; both sides of the nose mark and kept rubbing surface of the eye is myopic. Although there are set close enough to leave the drama to overthrow the testimony of the suspects, but still very appreciated this insight.Another wonderful place is a lot of analysis of human nature of the plot, such as the first to support the Davis people to explain why the old man would do the perjury, that is because of a comic book unknown to the public suddenly one day to get attention, others want to refer to his views, and flattered him with long battle, trying to hide myself the lame. It can be said that this is a weakness of human nature, in order to other people's attention or respect, at the same time distort the facts.Confrontation and Davis and his resolute opponents,Davis said a press button to personally chair is sadistic, who shouted I will kill rage came forward to beat Davis, you! And Davis were all pulled at him, calmly questions, you don't really want to kill me, right let him have nothing to say?. Clever people to move the stone to hit their feet very exciting, but the more exciting is the director here to give a very clear view, that is, an idiom in china.From A to Z 3 opponents is not for evil, frowning, talking is intolerable or pessimistic, but strong scream as you want the boy to death immediately said, this man has become a justice in the case when the correct, but when the error is a disaster. How can one be able to act as a judge of the fate of others by letting them have their own prejudices and that they have no prejudice? Only a disregard for human life.The discussion in the final is firmly opposed to face their own feelings with his photo when collapse over, perhaps the boy really killed my father, but this is a shining glory of human nature of the trial, the greatness of the judicial system reflects the most incisive. Especially with China nearly thousands ofyears of autocratic centralization comparison, and even become the decision habit, look at a building built not demolished and rebuilt for several years, I can not help worrying, Chinese how many innocent common people Yuansi, how many wise decisions in authoritarian pressure die, many seemingly overweeningly ambitious construction plan also in the pipeline?十二怒汉观后感英文版This Indoorsman empty and lonely months come out a fart, this essay is moving around the brain exercises, do not take it seriously."12 angry men", epee no front, delicate workAbout the film itselfOf all the movies I've seen, "12 fury" is not my favorite top ten, but it's definitely the most boring I've ever seen in the top 10. The whole film is only one scene, 12 men, hours of dialogue, or a black and white film. However, it is cattle, cattle cattle, with the most boring way, about the most exciting story.The whole film is about a murder trial. A bad boy was charged with the murder of his father, hear the voice of the old man across the street downstairs, witnessed the process of women's murder knife,unconvincing alibi, seems to have been placed in the electric chair in front of the child will be. 12 members of the jury will determine the child's life and death, but they have to make a unified ruling, the results can be effective. At the beginning of the film, 11 people think that the child is guilty, only one out of respect for life, that the case pending. After hours of hard work, all the evidence is classified as "reasonable doubt", that is to say, there is a reason why it cannot be fully established. The boy was acquitted.The story itself does not have any complicated place, neither brain nor burning suspense. However, the film, there is a kind of good. This is a typical confined space film, but there is no usually confined space film repression. The plot is fascinating, as if an invisible hand, grabbed in the viewer's mind, to promote the development of the plot. Then the hand is hidden very deep, you can only cast a tepid performance, and the degree of relaxation rhythm to feel it. It is difficult to point out that it is in which point, the plot, so that the merits of a step forward. It makes a "mission impossible" completed, but does not show abrupt. Likewarm boiled frog, unconsciously, has been the director of the road.On the confined space of the film, you can take the "12 angry Han" and "sniper phone booth" to do a comparison.The latter is my personal narrow viewing experience, in recent years considered very good confined space film. It is more intense than the "12 angry Han", more depressed, more popular. However, the latter of the wonderful, is the process of viewing the obvious exciting, the director deliberately for the tension (of course, it is not easy). It will be the hero and the audience, and placed under the gun, like a gun under the deer hunter. Every thought, every action, will determine your life and death. So it's hot, hormones are always high.The former is different, the director will be shot, placed on the spectator's point of view, and without any emotional color. Group play is also very difficult to bring the audience into the sense. This kind of calm angle of view, can let a person look at the whole process more calmly. The former is like the slalom, the latteris watching the scenery is better, but also the reader's taste.About humanityThe director cut the case in the form of a jury, but also brought another narrative convenience, no matter what kind of decisions made by the 12 angry men, will not have any impact on their own, they are bystanders. Moreover, the restriction of 12 people, a person's decision, the role of both large and small. This is like 100 thousand people pulling the hair of a person, everyone will think, he pulled out a hair of others will produce what kind of impact on the people, but when tenth million individuals pulled over the last hair, who is responsible for this thing? The individual in the collective judgment, are more likely to get a sense of security even moral, ah q would say, I feel the monk can not be touched? As a result, the only thing that can restrain the 12 anger is the moral of the individual, respect for life, the fear of the law, and the American dream of American pride. However, it is for the respect of other people's lives, the value of the personal status of citizens, can better reflect thereason why the "social man" noble.On Jurisprudence11:1, does not represent the overwhelming victory, the minority to the majority, also did not see so reasonable. Let a few people speak freely, is a fair basis.十二怒汉观后感英文版"The twelve fury", a black and white film that was shot in the 50s of the last century, still holds the top spot in the list of legal films. The filming of the film is now still seems to be very good or even fresh, a jury of twelve people to discuss the scene occupies the vast majority of the film. The basic circumstances of the case is almost a convicted juvenile patricide after the trial requires twelve man jury made unanimous verdict. Finally, after a long and bitter debate, the kind of people in the aura of human nature under the leadership of the hero to the boy to freedom.A movie is great, it must be that it allows everyone to find their own interpretation and indirect exposure to real life. What does the film say? The responsibility of the rights and obligations of unity, Americanjudicial system, "would rather let ten thousand can not kill the wrong one" judicial policy on human, fine, deep dig of character psychology analysis, inference of life precious goodness of life, respect, in the face of adversity to find a breakthrough in the actual combat skills, logical reasoning method and so on. Among them, my most shocking is the jury in the system of human feelings and legal justice in the game between the precise performance of the game.First of all, from the significance of the establishment of the jury system. As everyone knows, the jury system is a more common in the countries of Anglo American law system for the realization of democracy and set up the court ruling, but in this case is obviously that consisting of 6-12 people, a case of a group, decide whether the defendant guilty of petty jury. The task of the jury is to find the truth, to seek the defendant's heart, to judge whether the law is fair, and to fight against the dictatorship and oppression of the government. Judging from the case, twelve different personalities, different origins of the jury finally completed this sacred mission, although theprocess is full of hardships and disputes, although meager pay.Obviously, the jury system establishment greatly to the "people" will have reflected the way, representative of the first throw to the "people" problems, from the set goal, one of the ways of expression also embody the will of the consciousness of law. This movie is a result to the satisfaction of all, "people's democracy" successful practice, worthy of praise.It can be said that this kind of non professional, only the simple way to judge the feelings of law to a certain extent reflects the demographic characteristics and values of a society, naturally has a natural rationality and institutional affinity. This kind of justice can make the majority of the people in this society to be convinced, and not like the law of the general cold ruthless, the decision was also less likely to be overturned. This is also the system from the Anglo Saxon era has been widely used and today there are still many reference reasons.The next step is to discuss whether the justicebased on human judgment is the justice required on the legal balance.In the movie "Twelve Angry Men", each juror all have some worry, anxious to help their own work and entertainment, because of some emotional problems naturally to the case of the boy off, some because of hot weather to escape from the narrow discussion room...... All these practical problems are unable to avoid or even to be taken into account when the jury system is set up. But this is real life. As the most common people, the jury will be influenced by all kinds of personal and environmental factors.A great movie is that it takes all kinds of factors affecting the justice of Law -- or clear or vague to show in front of the audience, the audience from the heart to feel, if oneself is in jury, it is very difficult to guarantee that complete justice. Just one example, in seemingly irrefutable evidence, even lawyers are too lazy to defend for the boy, the judge is also a lazy way, that will make everyone believe: the child First impressions are strongest had killed his father and have to pay the price to be sent to thechair in the end has not yet started life. That is why there is a big gap between 11 and 1, which is likely to have an impact on the environment.It is a little question although it is difficult to have a keen insight into matters but people-oriented "actor has been discussed by expanding, finally let more and more jurors tend to believe that the boy innocence. But this calm person in reality is very rare, if we depend on every case in each group the jury can have a "hero" to calm to control, it is not realistic! As one of the judges in the film said to himself, "it's a little bit of a heart attack" if it's a long time to change into another jury. Just imagine, as a result, the jury system has become a kind of terrible, if the jury random selection will lead to two completely different results for the case even for a young life and death, let the life in the legal system of the people and how to maintain adequate sense of security and justice of law faith?So I think that any system has its own defects, the rationality of its existence and its inevitable, certainly not in personal feelings or political stanceover highly or completely system, the disadvantages and system optimization is the right path of human progress. It may also be a more than half an hour to convey the meaning of the film more far-reaching.Finally, it is worth mentioning that the opening and the end of the film is very interesting, with the film language1.十二怒汉观后感英文版2.十二怒汉观后感英文3.十二怒汉观后感英语4.十二怒汉观后感中英版5.精选十二怒汉观后感6.看不见的好朋友读后感怎么写7.坚定信念超越自我演讲稿200字8.什么的变化作文400字年重庆开学第一课观后感。

十二怒汉英语观后感English:Watching "12 Angry Men" was a powerful and thought-provoking experience. The film successfully captured the tension and drama of a jury deliberating over a seemingly open-and-shut case. Each character brought their own biases and prejudices to the table, making for compelling conflicts and moments of introspection. The gradual unraveling of the truth and the eventual realization of the jurors' duty to seek justice rather than expedience was both gripping and inspiring. The film's simple setting and focus on dialogue highlighted the importance of critical thinking and empathy in decision-making, urging viewers to question their assumptions and consider multiple perspectives. Overall, "12 Angry Men" serves as a timeless exploration of justice, human nature, and the power of a single voice to make a difference.中文翻译:观看《十二怒汉》是一次强大而发人深省的经历。

《十二怒汉》观后感：正义的力量与陪审团的责任Having watched the经典法庭戏剧 "Twelve Angry Men," I was deeply moved by the intense debate and the unwavering quest for truth among the jurors. This movie, set entirely within a courthouse room, showcases the power of perseverance and the importance of jury duty.The story revolves around a jury of twelve men, eachwith their own prejudices and biases, as they attempt to reach a verdict on a murder case. At first glance, the evidence seems clear-cut, pointing to the defendant's guilt. However, one juror, Number 8 (played by Henry Fonda), isnot convinced. He challenges the assumptions of his fellow jurors, sparking a debate that lasts for hours.As the debate ensues, each juror is forced to examine their own prejudices and assumptions. They delve into the details of the case, questioning the validity of the evidence and the motives of the witnesses. The film showcases how easily people can be swayed by initial impressions and how crucial it is to question those impressions.What struck me the most was the determination of Juror Number 8. He faced intense opposition and ridicule, but he never gave up. His perseverance and unwavering belief in the importance of jury duty inspired me. His actions remind us that each individual has the power to make a difference, even in seemingly hopeless situations.The film also highlights the importance of critical thinking and objective analysis. In today's world, where information is constantly flooding in from all directions, it's crucial to have the ability to filter through the noise and arrive at a rational conclusion. "Twelve Angry Men" teaches us that we should never accept things at face value and always question the motives and assumptions behind the information we receive.In conclusion, "Twelve Angry Men" is a powerful reminder of the importance of jury duty and the role of the individual in society. It teaches us the value of perseverance, critical thinking, and objective analysis. The film鼓励我们 to question our assumptions, challenge authority, and always strive for the truth.**《十二怒汉》观后感：正义的力量与陪审团的责任**观看经典法庭戏剧《十二怒汉》后，我深受触动。

十二怒汉观后感英语《十二怒汉》主要讲述12个陌生的普通人组成了一个陪审团，决定一个贫民窟的男孩的生死。

下面是英语的《十二怒汉》观后感，欢迎阅读。

十二怒汉观后感英语Before see comments, said that in XX the Russian remake version beyond the original, so I look at the Russian version, look after the feeling is more general, it is necessary to have a look at the original beauty. In a word: the 1957 edition is the peak!The 57 edition of 100 minute, 07 edition 160 min.. More than one hour to come, mainly the personal story of each juror. Yes, the 07 edition of the jury to make every judgment is based on personal experience, and the 57 version of the sentence according to the clues itself, so the 07 version looks more tired, the content is more verbose.But the 07 version will focus on domestic people's livelihood, many domestic situation or projections of each section of history, and personal experience about the lines of the film full of flesh and blood, very full, this is very great. Unfortunately, I'm not a Russianand I'm not too cold about these things. In contrast, the 57 edition of the rhythm of a lot faster, at very good.One thing is very rare, two versions have successfully created a different image of the 12 jurors, character, no soy sauce characters. But the 07 version did not copy the 57 version of the character set, the two sides clash also appeared different moves (07 edition of "guilty" leaders of hypnosis is really good! Impressive. I want to point out the special field this section , version 07 using multi camera editing and more messy sharp props, well made a tense atmosphere, very appetizing, this period of more than 57 more attractive.In the shooting intention, the 57 edition is onlyto restore the truth of the incident, to defend the law and justice, the 07 version is more humane and law whois more advanced thinking, giving the audience more room for reflection. Turn the film, can keep the original taste too difficult, can be improved to adaptto today's mass is more difficult, the 07 edition did great.On the reasonableness of narrative, version 57 ormore. The 57 edition of a list of the various court testimony and exhibits, audience and jury information synchronization. The 07 edition of each clue appears, you have to wait for a gentleman to finish the story, the debate is not the next one, then how do you explain the xxxxx it, completely put the audience in a passive position.Good suspense novel, should put all the clues are listed, the last time the secret, the audience should say "ah! This is so! We saw the clue! Can not be inferred!" And should not be what clues do not give you, secret, the audience said, "I do not know this thing!" And then the author retorted, "I didn't say nothing about it"In the story of fluency, the 57 edition is also more outstanding, the film successfully put all the camera frame died in a room. While the 07 version of the continuous growth of the Chechen juvenile fragments, continue to play back flash. Although it has enriched the content of the film, they have distracted me. Fortunately, the jury's personal story is dictated not shoot out with location, otherwise I really fell asleep.Let's get back to the score. For so many years and 57 years, MGM should be very mature, but the film's music is the greatest degree of narrowing the score, the total length of not more than five minutes. The five minute soundtrack is an understatement, symbolically set the mood, although not abrupt, not redundant, but also no color, no touching. I think the score can be taken away, and the rest.By the way of acting. But I first talk about another point: 57 edition and 07 edition of the jury have no names, the 57 edition of the 12 jurors is sitting by serial number, I can recognize, but the 07 version of the seat is a mess, I don't know who is who...... Well, that's not the point. Well, let's talk about acting.The head of the innocent - juror number 8 (Henry Fonda) is very upright, sitting posture stance is also very firm, giving a sense of stability. When the guilty leaders - juror number 3 (no - name) to demonstrate he assassination moves very calm, do not move a mountain. Have good gas. 3, the performance is also very good, he is the most stubborn, portrayed every word and actionis in place, and finally he as a father, standing in his father's position changed his mind, but also touching. And the brother asked in glasses, when a huge forehead oozing sweat, the acting is terrific. By the way, the 07 version of the innocent leader looks like Henry, but the expression of a lot of kindness, the tone is very soft and soft, from the beginning of the beginning of decent tough.I personally love the 57 version, in my heart it is the peak.十二怒汉观后感英语Russian version has a strong sense of subtlety.I never love political overtones, did not think this movie was involved in a war of national social factors and so on, more than two hours of film has let me unable to stop procrastinating, do something else, watch more than 8 hours, it was very.The story is a Chechen boy killed stepfather was brought to court, 12 jurors in a small room from only one person that he was innocent, the people put forward all kinds of evidence of doubt, finally everyone voted innocent boy. Almost everyone's background, ideas,opinions, etc..I do not say this movie is good or not, anyway, for political white ethnic confrontation problem has always been an insulator. It is said that after the first vote, there was a man who was not guilty, because he thought he could not be so hasty to send the child to the guillotine, so he proposed to carry out second anonymous voting, a person has also been acquitted.In this section I can not understand, though it should be the expression of real name and anonymous can change a person's decisions, do not blindly follow the crowd, but after the voting, the people immediately stand out is their own investment, which will soon be exposed "defection", also really can. In particular, the argument is not to take the child's life away.Heard that the black and white version 1957 better, so the next day is the turning point of view.From the rhythm, indeed very good grasp. Pinch out all kinds of unnecessary plot, is completely 12 people for each child to put forward their own justifications.Everything is at the center: if the child is likely to be innocent, he should not be convicted of the crime.The United States Justice, I have seen in the description of Linda to be truly understand, this movie is very perfect to show the American judicial philosophy: I would rather let one thousand, not kill the wrong one.In this story, every juror has no name, did not find out who is the real murderer, (because the Russian version of the real estate business, demolitions) discrimination the boy's identity is a slum origin, rather than racial conflicts......Until the last we walked out of the court, there are only two of the most important to insist on the innocent boy reported the name of each other, no phone, no address, there will be no intersection. From the people, back to the people.Space seems to be better.十二怒汉观后感英语Read the drama "12 people", and came back to review the United States under the old film of the year twelve, "the anger of the 57 Han".The story is very simple, a child, the film is colored, the drama did not appear, was accused of murdering his father. The family lived in the slums,in the eyes of some people from generation to generation are criminals and bad ass villain, natural. And all the evidence points to the child as the murderer. The draw for the 12 jurors, all staff have what occupation, 11 people think children guilty, only Henry Fonda architects think of doubt, although he is not very sure. As a result, an increasing number of jurors saw the suspect in the case and voted to pass.The result is not important, the process can glimpse the essence of Democracy: defend everyone's right to freedom of speech (Note: should be everybody's birthright, rather than the gifts of others, power) this person is either young or old, poor or rich, or who is ru. Democracy is the freedom to give everyone the full expression of their views. Of course, from this story can also be seen, small people, muddle along without any aim of moral justice or a sense of super guard unknown to the ordinary people are likely to be the representation of fudge, may also be in the democratic system under control. So, I agree, in the overall quality of the public is not high, the democracy is likely to fail, because many people vote not worthseveral Steamed Buns, or a lot of people do not know what is the election of a large number of individual shares, so after the collapse of the Soviet Union to the public ownership of private ownership by capitalists acquisition the situation may also occur in the family who have an ulterior motive power.After the liberation of China, there have been grassroots democracy experiment, which is Liu Shaoji pushed, but because of the resistance of the hair, did not push down. Now the community election, there are a lot of people say it is a formality, but from a positive point of view, this is not a democratic education, at least let everyone know how is the process of election. After a few years of your community appeared in a car with the big horn canvassing, do propaganda scenes, is very likely. At this time, democracy really into the lives of ordinary people, that is, democratic life. I met several people, without exception, and they talk of democracy in Taiwan, elected, they are not interested in, it is said that the Taiwan few young people are interested in politics; but in the mainland, in the premise of not achieveuniversal suffrage, politics seems to often is a topic of gossip for you talk about the. This is not because, people naturally than Taiwanese people interested in politics, just like to put you in the Qinghai Tibet Plateau, you think too little oxygen, need oxygen, but in the plain here, you will not care about what the air is. This is a scarce resource in economics. After the democratic life, everyone has become commonplace, It is quite common for a part of life, so everyone's interest naturally low, rather than talk about the star's private life is stimulated.Look at the handling of drama and movies, including the plot lines are exactly the same, but in the scene of the atmosphere, it reflects the different understanding of democracy under the two kinds of social systems. The drama is full of black background, spacious and solemn, express a kind of democracy and the divine worship, understanding of democracy from the mouth of a jury in the mouth, with the obvious meaning of religion. The scene is a small room with a narrow, is a sultry fidgety summer afternoon, twelve men crowded in a small space, discuss a majority of peoplethink a foregone conclusion, nature is not love. And one of the twelve fans, boss, advertisers are logical to have these occupation identity of a life of the background. Their tone of voice is also relatively soft and casual, although there are arguments, confrontation, but to give the feeling that this is a real life scene, their argument is part of their lives. On the stage of the jury is clearly an ideal space, let the audience start to think, in such a solemn place, the nature is a heavy topic, 12 people take is also sacred and arduous responsibility. This is a religious scene. I do not deny the 12 jurors responsibility is sacred and arduous, but in a democratic society, this responsibility has been a part of their lives, without the need for a special ceremony to worship.I think I should make it clear that the issue of democratic life, the next time to discuss the issue of democratization of life.。

十二怒汉观后感英文After watching the classic film "12 Angry Men," I am left with profound thoughts and emotions. The movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, takes place in a single room where twelve jurors deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murder. The gripping storyline, masterful acting, and thought-provoking themes have all left an indelible impression on me.One of the most remarkable aspects of "12 Angry Men" is its powerful portrayal of the human psyche and the complex dynamics that emerge in a confined space. The twelve jurors, each with their own biases, beliefs, and personalities, are forced to confront their deepest prejudices and rethink their initial judgments.The film beautifully captures the tension and conflicts that arise during deliberations. The initial vote reveals that eleven jurors are convinced of the young man's guilt, while one, played by Henry Fonda, has reasonable doubt. What ensues is a battle of wills and a clash of ideologies as Fonda's character challenges the group's consensus and demands a thorough examination of the evidence.As the jurors engage in heated discussions, their personal baggage and unresolved issues come to the fore. Their biases towards race, social class, and personal experiences heavily influence their perceptions of the accused. Lumet masterfully exposes the flaws in the justice system, highlighting how preconceived notions and personal prejudices can influence the outcome of a trial.Furthermore, "12 Angry Men" serves as a powerful critique of conformity and the dangers of a mob mentality. As Fonda's character persists in his quest for justice, he faces resistance from those who are more interested in a quick verdict rather than a fair one. The film raises the question of individual responsibility and the importance of critically examining evidence, even when it goes against the majority opinion.The performances in "12 Angry Men" are nothing short of brilliant. Each actor brings depth and nuance to their respective characters, further enhancing the film's impact. Henry Fonda's restrained and resolute portrayal of Juror 8 is particularly noteworthy. He embodies calm rationality in the face of overwhelming opposition, effectively challenging the other jurors' biases and forcing them to question their assumptions.The film's direction deserves high praise. Lumet expertly utilizes the confined space of the jury room to intensify the dramatic tension. Through carefully crafted shots and camera angles, he captures the jurors' emotions and reactions, allowing the audience to engage fully with the unfolding drama.In the end, "12 Angry Men" offers a powerful message about the importance of empathy, critical thinking, and the pursuit of justice. It reminds us that everyone is entitled to a fair trial, regardless of their background or circumstances. The film encourages us to question our own biases, challenge the status quo, and advocate for a more just society.It is worth noting that "12 Angry Men" was made over six decades ago, yet its themes remain relevant today. In a world plagued by social and political divisiveness, the film serves as a stark reminder of the necessity toovercome our differences and work towards common understanding and justice.In conclusion, "12 Angry Men" is an extraordinary film that explores the complexities of the human psyche, the dangers of conformity, and the pursuit of justice. Its timeless themes, compelling performances, and expert direction make it a cinematic masterpiece that continues to resonate with audiences. After watching this film, one cannot help but reflect on the fragility of justice and the power of individual conviction.。

十二怒汉观后感英文I recently watched the classic film "Twelve Angry Men," which left a deep impression on me. 这部影片让我印象深刻，它讲述了一个陪审团在审判一桩谋杀案件时的故事。

The film revolves around a jury of twelve men who are tasked with deliberating the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of murder. 影片围绕着一个由十二名男士组成的陪审团，他们的任务是审议一个年轻人被指控犯有谋杀罪的有罪或无罪。

The setting of the film primarily takes place in a single room where the jury deliberates, and it showcases the intense dynamics and personal conflicts among the jurors. 这部电影的主要场景发生在一个房间里，陪审团在这里进行审议，展现了陪审员之间激烈的动态和个人冲突。

The film is a thought-provoking exploration of the American judicial system and the human nature of prejudice, bias, and the concept of reasonable doubt. 这部影片是对美国司法制度以及人类偏见、偏见和合理怀疑概念的深入思考。

One of the most striking aspects of the film is how it delves into the complexities of human psychology and social dynamics. 电影最引人注目的一个方面是它深入探讨了人类心理和社会动态的复杂性。

12怒汉观后感英文版Introduction:"12 Angry Men" is a classic American courtroom drama film released in 1957. Directed by Sidney Lumet, the film revolves around the jury deliberations of a murder trial. The film explores themes of prejudice, justice, and the power of persuasion. After watching this thought-provoking film, I was compelled to reflect on the various aspects that made it such a significant piece of cinema.Body:1. Plot Overview:The film takes place almost entirely in a jury room, where twelve jurors deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murdering his own father. Initially, it seems like an open-and-shut case, but as the deliberations progress, diverse opinions and biases emerge among the jurors. The plot follows their intense discussions, examination of evidence, and interpersonal conflicts.2. Character Analysis:One of the remarkable aspects of the film is the depth of the characters. Each juror has a unique personality, with their prejudices and preconceived notions affecting their judgment. Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, stands out as the protagonist who challenges the assumptions and prejudices of his fellow jurors. His calm demeanor, rational thinking, and unwavering beliefin justice make him a central figure.3. Themes Explored:a. Prejudice: One of the dominant themes explored in the film is prejudice. Through the jurors' deliberations, it becomes evident how personal biases and stereotypes can cloud judgment and hinder the pursuit of justice. The film highlights the importance of looking beyond one's preconceptions in making fair and unbiased decisions.b. Justice: The concept of justice is at the core of the film. As the jurors deliberate, they grapple with their responsibility to ensure a fair trial for the accused. The film raises questions about the reliability of the legal system and the role of individuals in upholding justice. It prompts the audience to consider the moral and ethical dilemmas associated with delivering a verdict.c. Power of Persuasion: Another significant theme in the film is the power of persuasion. As the jurors engage in heated discussions, they employ various strategies to convince their peers. Each argument, presented with conviction, has the potential to sway the opinion of others. This exploration of persuasive techniques offers insights into human psychology and decision-making processes.4. Cinematic Techniques:The film's director skillfully utilizes various cinematic techniques to heighten the tension and create a sense of claustrophobia. The confined space of the jury room intensifies the emotional atmosphere, with the camera angles emphasizing the characters' reactions and interactions. The use of close-ups showcases the jurors' facial expressions, highlighting their inner conflicts and changing attitudes.5. Impact on Society:"12 Angry Men" had a significant impact on society, generating discussions about the flaws in the legal system and the need for objective judgment. Moreover, it sparked conversations around race, social inequality, and the dangers of prejudice. The film serves as a powerful reminder that justice should not be influenced by personal biases, as it has the potential to change lives and shape society.Conclusion:"12 Angry Men" is a timeless classic that transcends cultural and temporal boundaries. Its exploration of prejudice, justice, and the power of persuasion remains relevant today. The thoughtful character development, compelling themes, and skillful cinematography contribute to its enduring legacy. The film serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of open-mindedness, critical thinking, and fair judgment in the pursuit of justice.Note: The word count of the above response is 480 words. To achieve the desired word count, additional analysis, examples, and reflections could be included.。

十二怒汉观后感中英版《十二怒汉》整个故事发生在一间陪审团休息室里。

一个在贫民窟长大的18岁少年因为杀害自己的父亲被告上法庭，证人言之凿凿，各方面的证据都对他极为不利。

十二个不同职业的人组成了这个案件的陪审团，他们要在休息室达成一致的意见，裁定少年是否有罪，如果罪名成立，少年将会被判处死刑。

十二个陪审团成员各有不同，除了8号陪审员之外，其他人对这个犯罪事实如此清晰的案子不屑一顾，还没有开始讨论就认定了少年有罪。

8号陪审员提出了自己的“合理疑点”，耐心地说服其他的陪审员，在这个过程中，他们每个人不同的人生观也在冲突和较量。

下面是中英版的《十二怒汉》观后感，欢迎阅读。

十二怒汉观后感中英版第一次看西德尼.美特的《十二怒》，想到是我看的最好的影片，本片于1957年，得了第7柏林影金熊以及其他影多提名和，一部女座作品就能得如此多，可演西德尼.美特定成一名影大。

除了和尾的境交代，全片就是在一小室的景拍完成的，能在一“枯燥”的境下故事不失精彩，度是相大的，一是得力于精彩的本，二是得力于出色的演，三是得力于精密的和度。

本本身的就非常具有可性，一人孤到最後所有人的倒戈相向，程看上去是一“不可能完成的任”，但因主角亨利.方生命的尊重、真相密的剖析、法律公平公正的持、“怒”之人的容和醒等等秀的品，最後征服了所有反他的人，并使各行各麻木之人得到了正的醒。

通一的景就明多哲理，且的相互交不失密、人物定具有典型的代表性，不能不在是高明。

影片非常具有性，甚至可以修改就能成一部舞本，已有人做了。

因景的固定所以演的表演要求甚高，而了原性，保持演於角色和的新感，很多都是用了超的一呵成，就要求演不能出差，但是12人的和度免出差，可以看得出很多是精心排的，尤其是影度的配合需要更加精和密，如果有一人出差可能就致全重，所以演的表演既要高度又要保持弛和自然，度一不於真的舞表演。

於人物性格的把握各有千秋，老和方的表演最出色。

本片有一更加突出的特色便是演於把控，面用了多分的，是很的，有一失就影整部的奏并耗大量拍源，所以在拍前演做了大量的排，互相“”，如影走到哪哪演始到哪，演道或者行到哪影怎的曲到哪，而之光音又要怎配合等等。

十二怒汉英语观后感As the final curtain drew to a close on the timeless drama "Twelve Angry Men," I found myself sitting in silence, digesting the profound impact the play had made on my understanding of justice, persuasion, and the remarkable power of a single voice. Directed by Sidney Lumet and adapted from a 1954 teleplay by Reginald Rose, the filmtells the story of a jury of twelve men, each with theirown prejudices and biases, as they deliberate the fate ofan eighteen-year-old boy accused of murdering his father.What initially appears to be a straightforward case of guilt turns into a grueling battle of wills and minds asone juror, number 8 (played brilliantly by Henry Fonda), challenges the verdict of "guilty" that seems inevitable. His arguments are not based on technical legal knowledge or forensic evidence but on common sense, morality, and the basic humanity that each of us possesses. His unwavering belief in the boy's innocence, coupled with his refusal to accept the majority's verdict without a thoroughexamination of all the facts, slowly but surely begins to sway the other jurors.The film is a masterclass in persuasion, demonstrating how one man can turn the tide of opinion by using logic, empathy, and a relentless quest for truth. Juror 8's approach is both methodical and emotional, appealing to the rational and emotional sides of his fellow jurors. He doesn't shout or become angry; instead, he speaks calmly and confidently, allowing his words to sink in gradually. His arguments are not just about the boy's innocence or guilt but about the very nature of justice and the responsibility each of us has in ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done.The film also highlights the importance of critical thinking and the dangers of groupthink. In the initial stages of the deliberation, the jury is almost unanimous in its verdict of "guilty." It's only when Juror 8 starts to question the evidence and the witnesses that cracks begin to appear in the consensus. This reluctance to question the majority's verdict is a powerful reminder of how easy it is for us to fall into the trap of groupthink, accepting the prevailing opinion without questioning its validity.Moreover, the film underscores the importance of listening to dissenting voices. Juror 8's persistence in pointing out the flaws in the prosecution's case and the inconsistencies in the evidence forces his fellow jurors to reevaluate their own beliefs and prejudices. This process of critical reevaluation is crucial in any democratic society where the pursuit of truth and justice must always trump majority rule.In conclusion, "Twelve Angry Men" is not just a film about a jury deliberation; it's a profound exploration of human nature, the role of justice in society, and the remarkable power of persuasion. It reminds us that justice is not just about laws and regulations but about the moral and ethical choices we make as individuals. It teaches us the value of listening to dissenting voices and the importance of critically examining the evidence before making decisions that can profoundly impact the lives of others. Finally, it reminds us that one person, with the right arguments and perseverance, can make a difference and change the course of justice.**《十二怒汉》：关于正义、说服力和个体声音力量的反思性随笔**当《十二怒汉》这部永恒戏剧的终幕缓缓落下时，我发现自己陷入了沉思，这部作品深刻影响了我对正义、说服力和个体声音力量的理解。

12AngryMen（十二怒汉）案例分析第一篇：12 Angry Men(十二怒汉)案例分析Angry Men(十二怒汉)案例分析摘要本文将对12 Angry Men(十二怒汉)这部影片中人物的对话和动作进行分析，了解他们所使用的沟通手法和这些方法起到的作用，剖析为什么相同的沟通方式在不同的情况之下会达到不一样的效果，从而从中学习如何在不同的情形下，应该采取什么样的沟通方式更为有效，更能达到目的。

在影片当中，八号男主角与三号愤怒的父亲和十号感冒的先生的沟通方式截然不同，因此将着重对他们的对话进行挖掘，在对比中发现它们对其他人起到的作用，由此能够更加的明了沟通的环境与沟通方式之间的联系。

正文这部电影描述了十二名陪审员经过六天的听审之后，在表决是否认定被指控杀害父亲的被告有罪时，出现了十一名认为有罪，而有一名觉得事态可疑，坚持己见提出异议，由此展开了激烈的讨论。

在经过七次表决，认定有罪的人越来越少，最终以无罪判定被告。

在最开始的时候，除了八号陪审员男主角认为有可疑点和三号陪审员愤怒的父亲、四号陪审员股票经纪人与十号陪审员感冒的先生认为有罪外，其它的人虽然表决认为有罪，但立场不是十分坚定，例如二号陪审员银行职员只是觉得被告有罪，九号陪审员老人只是在大家都认定有罪时也跟着表决有罪。

在十二人当中八号陪审员的对话方式与三号陪审员和十号陪审员的方式形成了非常鲜明的对比。

从第一次表决开始，十号陪审员便一直就采用了歧视性语言、以“you are not ok”的态度来进行对话，他说道：“天啊，总是会出现唱反调的人”，虽然显得很强式，却没法对其他人起到影响力。

而男主角是以一种冷静温和，立场非常明确坚定的与其它人进行对话，对别人的话没有去加以否定，而是不断地强调自己只是对事不对人。

当被七号陪审员问到是不是想改变他(七号陪审员)的看法时，男主角回答道：“我不想改变你的思想，但这个判决攸关一条人命”。

此时他很好的表明了自己是在对事，同时以“珍重生活”这共同的价值观把彼此放在同一个立场，接着又介绍了被告的过去，希望能引起大家的重视，把自己的形象表现的公正正直。

12怒汉中英文观后感《12怒汉》（12 Angry Men）是一部经典的电影，以其深刻的对话和精彩的演技而闻名。

这部电影于1957年上映，由西德尼·吕美特（Sidney Lumet）执导，根据雷金纳尔德·罗斯（Reginald Rose）的剧本改编而成。

电影多次被翻拍和改编，但原版仍然是最为经典的。

这部电影围绕着一个陪审团在审判一桩谋杀案时的故事展开，通过展示不同陪审团成员的观点和性格，探讨了人性、偏见、正义和合作的主题。

《12怒汉》的故事情节发生在一个炎热的夏日。

十二个男性陪审团成员被指派审判一桩涉嫌谋杀的案子，被告是一位18岁的年轻男子。

他被指控在争吵过程中刺死了自己的父亲。

在剧院中一个封闭的房间里，陪审团成员开始讨论证据，给予审判。

这12个陪审团成员中，有一个黑人、有一个外国人，而其他则是白人中年男性。

一开始，大多数人都同意被告有罪。

然而，一个名为亨利·方达（Henry Fonda）的陪审员起初对证据持怀疑态度，他认为被告有可能被冤枉。

方达坚决主张展开更多的讨论和辩论，而其他人则表示不愿意改变初衷。

该片以强烈的对白描绘了陪审团成员之间的紧张关系和不同的观点。

每个角色都有自己的经验和看法，对案件本身有不同的评判标准和偏见。

主要环节中，方达挑战现有的证据，并提供了一些新的观点和解释，试图让其他人重新考虑案件。

通过方达的坚持不懈和推动，一些陪审团成员开始质疑案件的真相。

他们开始重新审视证人的证词和物证，提出了一些合理的怀疑，并指出了存在疑点的地方。

随着对话的深入，人们开始怀疑警方的调查手段和法庭程序的公正性。

在一系列的讨论中，这些陪审团成员逐渐克服自己的偏见和成见。

他们开始相信被告的无辜，并对案件中的证据进行更加细致入微的分析。

这种团队合作和集体智慧使得他们能够看到隐藏在证据背后的真相，将自己的个人经验和情感放到一边，以更客观的眼光审判案件。

《12怒汉》通过这个小小的陪审团室，展示了人性的复杂性和正义的重要性。

十二怒汉英文观后感Title: Reflections on "12 Angry Men"Introduction:"12 Angry Men" is a gripping courtroom drama that explores the themes of justice, prejudice, and the power of persuasion. After watching this classic film, I was captivated by its engaging narrative and thought-provoking portrayal of the American legal system. In this essay, I will delve into the fascinating characters, the suspenseful plot, and the underlying social commentary that make "12 Angry Men" a timeless masterpiece.Character Analysis:The film primarily focuses on 12 jury members as they deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murder. Each juror represents a distinct personality, reflecting various aspects of human nature. For instance, Juror #3 embodies stubbornness and a predisposition to view the accused as guilty, while Juror #8 demonstrates empathy, critical thinking, and a relentless pursuit of truth. As the plot unfolds, these characters clash, revealing the flaws and virtues inherent in human behavior.Through his nuanced character development, director Sidney Lumet manages to present multifaceted individuals who are not one-dimensional archetypes. This allows the audience to form a connection and empathize with them, as we witness their personal struggles, biases, and inner conflicts. The performances by the ensemble cast, led by Henry Fonda as Juror #8, are exceptional in bringing these characters to life and adding depth to their journey of self-discovery.Plot and Narrative Tension:"12 Angry Men" takes place in a cramped jury room, intensifying the sense of claustrophobia and increasing the narrative tension. As the jurors debate the evidence, confrontations and alliances emerge, creating a palpable atmosphere of suspense. Lumet skillfully employs close-ups and camera angles, particularly during heated exchanges, toemphasize the emotional stakes involved in this life-or-death decision. The relentless passing of the time in real-time amplifies the urgency of the situation and underscores the ethical dilemmas faced by the jurors.The film's screenplay, adapted from Reginald Rose's teleplay, unravels like a tightly woven puzzle. The initial certainty of the majority quickly gives way to doubt, leading to a thorough examination of the evidence and testimonies. As the layers of prejudice and personal bias are gradually stripped away, the truth slowly emerges. This slow-burning narrative keeps the audience engaged, questioning their own assumptions and prejudices along the way.Social Commentary:Beyond its gripping storyline, "12 Angry Men" provides poignant social commentary. The film challenges us to reflect on the flaws within the legal system and human nature itself. The entrenched biases of some jury members highlight the dangers of preconceived notions and the power of collective decision-making. Lumet subtly criticizes the conformist tendencies that can overshadow rational thinking in the face of societal pressure.Moreover, "12 Angry Men" serves as a reminder of the significance of the judicial process in ensuring justice for all individuals, regardless of their background or societal standing. The film portrays the importance of dissenting voices, critical thinking, and the responsibility of those endowed with the power to make life-altering decisions. By exploring the flaws and virtues of the jury system, the film invites us to ponder the broader implications these implications have on fairness and equality in society.Conclusion:"12 Angry Men" is a timeless classic that manages to captivate and challenge viewers through its examination of the complexities inherent in human behavior and the pursuit of justice. Lumet's expert direction, combined with stellar performances and a tightly-woven plot, creates an intense and emotionally charged experience. As we witnessthe jury members grapple with their biases and arrive at a just verdict, we are compelled to reflect on our own prejudices and responsibilities as members of society.。