誊分表
- 格式:docx
- 大小:19.11 KB
- 文档页数:2
初中英语作文分数划分标准表格Grading Standards for Junior High School English Composition。
Introduction:In this document, we will discuss the grading standards for junior high school English compositions. These standards will help teachers evaluate students' writing skills, language proficiency, and overall comprehension of the given topic. By providing clear guidelines and criteria, the grading process becomes fair and consistent. This document aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the grading standards for junior high school English compositions.Content:The grading standards for junior high school English compositions are divided into four categories: content, organization, language, and mechanics. Each category is further divided into subcategories, which will be discussed in detail below.1. Content:The content category evaluates the relevance and depth of the ideas presented in the composition. It includes the following subcategories:a. Relevance: The composition should address the given topic and stay focused throughout.b. Ideas and Development: The composition should demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic and provide well-developed ideas and arguments.c. Supporting Details: The composition should include relevant and specific examples, facts, or evidence to support the main ideas.d. Originality: The composition should showcase the student's creativity and unique perspective on the topic.2. Organization:The organization category assesses the structure and coherence of the composition. It includes the following subcategories:a. Introduction: The composition should have a clear and engaging introduction that introduces the topic and grabs the reader's attention.b. Body Paragraphs: The composition should have well-structured body paragraphs that present ideas in a logical and coherent manner.c. Transitions: The composition should use appropriate transitional words and phrases to ensure smooth flow between paragraphs and ideas.d. Conclusion: The composition should have a concise and impactful conclusion that summarizes the main points and leaves a lasting impression.3. Language:The language category evaluates the student's command of the English language. It includes the following subcategories:a. Vocabulary: The composition should demonstrate a wide range of vocabulary, including appropriate word choice and usage.b. Grammar: The composition should have proper grammatical structures, including accurate verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and sentence formation.c. Sentence Variety: The composition should showcase a variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences.d. Clarity and Coherence: The composition should be clear, concise, and easy to understand, with coherent ideas and logical connections between sentences and paragraphs.4. Mechanics:The mechanics category assesses the student's attention to detail in terms of spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. It includes the following subcategories:a. Spelling: The composition should have accurate spelling, with minimal spelling errors.b. Punctuation: The composition should have proper punctuation marks, including commas, periods, question marks, and exclamation marks.c. Capitalization: The composition should use capital letters appropriately for proper nouns, sentence beginnings, and titles.d. Neatness and Presentation: The composition should be neatly written or typed, with appropriate spacing and formatting.Conclusion:The grading standards for junior high school English compositions cover four main categories: content, organization, language, and mechanics. By evaluating these aspects, teachers can assess students' writing skills and provide constructive feedback for improvement. It is essential for students to understand these standards and strive for excellence in their compositions. With practice and guidance, students can enhance their writing abilities and communicate effectively in English.。
辩论赛评分表团队评分表(100分)评分要点正方反方开篇立论(10分)1.开篇立论逻辑清晰,言简意赅,论点明晰,分析透彻2.论据内容丰富,引用资料充分恰当、准确3.分析的角度和层次具有说服力和逻辑性4.语言表达流畅、有文采攻辩(20分)1.表达清晰、论证合理而有力2.回答问题精准、处理问题有技巧(攻、守、避合理)3.推理过程合乎逻辑,事实引用得当攻辩小结(10分)1.全面归纳对方的矛盾差错,并作系统的反驳和攻击2.辩护有理有据及有力,说服力强自由辩论(25分)1.攻防转换有序,把握论辩主动权2.针对对方的论点、论据进行有力反驳3.语言表达清晰流畅,事实引用得当总结陈词(15分)1.全面总结本方的立场、论证,系统反驳对方的进攻,为本方辩护;2.语言表达具有说服力和逻辑性观众提问(10分)辩驳有理有据有力,说服力强,紧密贴合本方观点团队配合及临场反应(10分)辩论队整体形象;辩风、整体配合、语言运用、临场反应(语言、风度、举止、表情);有团队精神,相互支持;论辩衔接流畅;反应敏捷,应对能力强;问答形成一个有机整体团体总分个人评分表(100分)评分标准正方反方一辩二辩三辩四辩一辩二辩三辩四辩语言表达(20分)1.普通话标准、语速适中2.口头、肢体语言和谐3.修辞得当、表达合理4.表达流畅、说理透彻逻辑推理(20分)1.逻辑推理过程清晰2.论证结果合理、有力辩驳能力 1.提问简明扼要,设问针(20分)对性强2.回答问题精准、处理问题有技巧3.反驳有理有据、引用实例恰当4.引用实例恰当临场反应(15分)1.反应敏捷,用语得体,2.技巧多元得当整体意识(15分)1.分工合理、协调一致2.衔接有序、互为攻守3.自由辩论思路清晰,气氛调节有度综合印象(10分)1.仪态、着装合理2.台风与辩风,有风度及幽默感3.尊重对方辩友、评委和观众个人总分。
周次: 时间:
2、课前预习包含课前阅读、认识理解字词、学案完善、发现问题等方面积分。
3、合作交流主要以交流充分、交流效果、结对帮扶完成情况积分。
4、展示汇报主要以状态面貌、合理分工、汇报效果完成情况积分。
5、完成作业以课堂作业等次加分,家庭作业完成情况加分。
6、考试提高主要指小组平均成绩提高值排名,分别加10、8、6、4分。
7、进步个人测试中进步为小组加分,1至3名加4分,4至6名加3分,7至10名加2分。
8、星级以积分高低决定。
9、每周一表,每月汇总,每月表彰,期末重奖。
五(2)班语文小组合作学习评价积分表
成功就是每天进步一点点
月 日至 月 日
2、课前预习包含课前阅读、认识理解字词、学案完善、发现问题等方面积分。
3、合作交流主要以交流充分、交流效果、结对帮扶完成情况积分。
4、展示汇报主要以状态面貌、合理分工、汇报效果完成情况积分。
5、完成作业以课堂作业等次加分,家庭作业完成情况加分。
6、考试提高主要指小组平均成绩提高值排名,分别加10、8、6、4分。
7、进步个人测试中进步为小组加分,1至3名加4分,4至6名加3分,7至10名加2分。
8、星级以积分高低决定。
9、每周一表,每月汇总,每月表彰,期末重奖。
巧用表格,让作文批改低耗高效在接受语文作文批改时,许多同学都会遇到这样的问题:老师批改作文太慢、费时费力,而且注释混乱、容易遗漏。
其实,合理利用表格是解决这一问题的好方法。
接下来,我将介绍几种可行的巧用表格的方法,让作文批改低耗高效。
一、评分表格法评分表格是作文批改中最常见的形式,它在学术研究或是各种评选中都有广泛的应用。
我们可以参考学校或老师提供的评分标准,仿照标准制作一份带有评分表格的作文模板。
在模板中,可设置多项指标,如语言运用、文学性、逻辑思维、内容丰富度等,用一定的分数标准对每项指标进行打分。
评分表格具有工整明了、可重复利用、易于比较等优点,方便同学们掌握评分标准,并且有助于老师快速评分及找到作文的不足之处。
二、纠错表格法这种表格可以帮助老师或同学快速找到作文中存在的问题,如用词不当、句法错误、标点不规范等。
制作纠错表格时,可将常见错误分类,如拼写错误、语法错误、标点错误等,同时留下行号、列数和错误类型的标记,以便在批改时快速定位和更正。
纠错表格还可与评分表格相结合,将作文中存在的错误量转化为扣分项,以倒逼同学扬长避短、提升写作水平。
三、标注表格法标注表格是一种将评语、意见和建议分列在表格中的方法。
对于每个段落,老师可以在表格中写下自己的感受,如卖点不足、表达单一、角色形象不生动等,同时在表格的侧边打上相应的标记,以便于同学快速查阅。
标注表格除了为作文提供具体的修改建议,还可以使老师在批改时不遗漏任何一个问题,确保批改的全面性和准确性。
四、任务表格法对于语文老师而言,评价一篇作文不仅仅是对文学性和语言运用的评价,还需要对文本是否符合任务要求进行评判。
在该任务表格中,可以设计出学科要求、评价指标、要求细节等表格,以帮助学生了解作文要求及评价标准,同时便于教师对学生作答情况进行评估,并指导学生进行合理的改进。
综合而言,合理利用各种表格,可以帮助同学更好地理解教师的评价标准和修改建议,也可以为语文老师提高批改效率,提供科学、规范、全面的评估支持。