Review Paper-论文评审模板

2) In abstract, the content has to be clarified.
A) because both Li and 4-parameter Birch-Murnaghan EOSs are based on the four parameters, I think that the auothers need to show what is difference between these two EOSs.
B) I can not understand "when the fitting energy vs. volume points are scattered in a wide scale or have a large number of data to fit". Does it mean that the obtained energy-vs-volume curves are not smoothing? In addition, a large number of data to fit should not be a problem for the application of various EOS. In terms of my experiences, the large number of data is better to fit EOS.
C) Two sentences "Moreover, it is found that Li equation has the best performance among these exponential EOSs with the smallest fitting errors" and "The further comparison of the fitting the pressure vs. volume points shows that Li equation performs as the best one as well among the exponential EOSs." I am feeling very sad for these two sentences. They mean the same sentence.

最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。

幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。

呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目标和结果不清晰。

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study. Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。

Paper Review 写法paper review的一般写法一篇Paper Review按照内容可以分为三个部分：1、这篇Paper的概况。

谁写的？在哪儿写的？哪年发表的等等……2、这篇Paper的内容。

3、你对这篇Paper的看法。

详细点来说是这样的：第一部分：文章概况这部分是最为简单和公式化的，内容主要是文章的作者，作者所处的位置，文章的出处：会议论文还是期刊，或者是网上的资料，文章的读者是哪些。

如果有必要，可以在这部分加入对文章整体的简略评价。

第二部分：文章内容这部分也是比较公式化的。

因为每一篇合格的论文都会包含一下的几个部分：1.background 背景2.problem/hypothesis 问题/假设3.solution/argumentation 解决方案/论证4.experimental test/conclusion 实验/结论把每个点用一句话来概括就可以了，要注意的是不必叙述每个细节，把文章的主线理清楚就可以了。

第三部分：你的看法这部分是最为重要的，你的评价应该直接反映该篇文章对你的研究有何意义、文章的强处以及弱处。

你对文章的评价可以分为三层。

最高层的是对文章的内容的评价，例如方法是否新颖，解决的问题是否有意义，所用的实验步骤、实验对象是否合适，结论是否正确。

第二层是关于文章的结构和风格的，如论述的组织是否合理，论证的过程有没有漏洞，文章的段落结构有没有问题等等。

最底层的是关于文章的用词以及语法方面的评价，句子是否通顺，词语是否恰当，有没有更好的表达方式等等。

三层的重要性是递减的，最上面的那一层是最重要的，这应该是你读文章的重点，也应该是你写Review的重点。

关于一些写Review的细节问题，可以查看这篇出自University of Massachusetts Lowell 的文章。

里面列出了一些写Review的该注意的问题，不过比较凌乱。

此外，还有一点是需要注意的。

英文论文审稿意见汇总1、目标和结果不清晰。

It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experimentsshould be provided.3、对于研究设计的rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis needs to be presented。