Students interacting through a Cognitive Apprenticeship Learning Environment. Paper present
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:408.46 KB
- 文档页数:8
2025年教师资格考试高中英语学科知识与教学能力自测试题及解答参考一、单项选择题(本大题有30小题,每小题2分,共60分)1、In the following sentence, which word is an auxiliary verb?A. CanB. TheC. HappyD. On答案:A解析:在给出的选项中,“Can” 是一个助动词,用来帮助构成疑问句和否定句。
其他选项“The” 是定冠词,“Happy” 是形容词,“On” 是介词。
2、Which of the following phrases is an example of a gerund?A. To runB. RunningC. RanD. Runned答案:B解析:在给出的选项中,“Running” 是动名词,它是一个表示动作的名词形式,可以用作主语、宾语或表语。
其他选项“To run” 是不定式,“Ran” 是动词的过去式,“Runned” 是错误的拼写。
3、The sentence “The novel is gripping and I just can’t put it down.” can best be described as:A) grammatically incorrectB) ambiguousC) redundantD) colloquialAnswer: D) colloquialExplanation: The sentence uses a colloquial expression, “put it down,” which is common in casual conversation and not typically found in formal writing. The sentence is grammatically correct, not ambiguous, and not redundant.4、Which of the following teaching strategies is most effective for engaging students in a lively discussion about a historical event?A)Providing a list of facts about the event and asking students to memorize themB)Presenting a lecture on the event and encouraging questions after the presentationC)Distributing a set of primary source documents related to the event and guidingstudents through a discussion based on the documentsD)Showing a documentary about the event and asking students to write a summary ofthe main pointsAnswer: C) Distributing a set of primary source documents related to the event and guiding students through a discussion based on the documentsExplanation: Distributing primary source documents and guiding students through a discussion allows them to engage with the material directly, fostering critical thinking and active learning. This strategy is more effective than rotememorization, passive listening, or passive viewing, as it encourages interaction and analysis.5、In the following sentence, which word is a demonstrative pronoun?A. This is my book.B. The book is mine.C. I have a book on the desk.D. My book is on the table.Answer: A. This is my book.Explanation: The demonstrative pronoun is “this,” which is used to point out specific objects that are near the speaker or the listener. In this sentence, “this” is used to point to the book that belongs to the speaker.6、Which of the following phrases correctly uses the past continuous tense to describe an action that was happening at a specific time in the past?A. He was walking to the store.B. He walked to the store.C. He had walked to the store.D. He will walk to the store.Answer: A. He was walking to the store.Explanation: The past continuous tense is used to describe an action that was happening at a specific time in the past. In this case, “He was walking to the store” indicates that the action of walking was ongoing at a particular moment in the past. The other options either describe a simple past action, a pastperfect action, or a future action.7、Which of the following is NOT a common approach to teaching vocabulary in high school English classes?A) Contextualized learningB) Memorization of word listsC) Use of visual aidsD) Word formation analysisAnswer: BExplanation: In high school English classes, vocabulary teaching often emphasizes meaningful and context-based learning rather than rote memorization. Contextualized learning (A), use of visual aids (C), and word formation analysis (D) are all common and effective strategies for teaching vocabulary. Memorization of word lists (B), while it may have a place in language learning, is not typically the primary or most effective approach in high school English classes, where the focus is on deeper understanding and application of language.8、Which teaching method encourages students to actively engage in the learning process, making connections between new information and their prior knowledge?A) Direct instructionB) Inquiry-based learningC) Cooperative learningD) Reciprocal teachingAnswer: BExplanation: Inquiry-based learning (B) is a teaching method that encourages students to actively explore and investigate a topic or issue, making connections between new information and their prior knowledge. This approach fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Direct instruction (A) involves the teacher presenting information to students, with less emphasis on active engagement. Cooperative learning (C) focuses on students working together in groups to achieve a common goal, but it does not necessarily emphasize inquiry or making connections to prior knowledge. Reciprocal teaching (D) is a strategy used to improve reading comprehension, where students take on roles as teacher and learner, but it is not specifically focused on inquiry-based learning.9、Which of the following sentences correctly uses the subjunctive mood to express a hypothetical situation?A. If I was you, I would accept the offer.B. If I were you, I would accept the offer.C. If I am you, I would accept the offer.D. If I will be you, I would accept the offer.Answer: BExplanation: The correct form for expressing a hypothetical situation in the present or future using the subjunctive mood is “If I were you,” not “If I was you,” “If I am you,” or “If I will be you.” The subjunctive “were”is used here to indicate a condition that is contrary to fact or that expressesa hypothetical or desired state.10、In the context of teaching vocabulary, which method encourages students to discover meanings on their own and fosters deeper learning through active engagement?A. Direct instruction, where the teacher provides definitions.B. Rote memorization, where students repeat words until they remember them.C. Incidental learning, where students learn words through reading and context.D. Decontextualized drills, where students practice words without any context.Answer: CExplanation: Incidental learning, or learning through reading and context, allows students to infer the meanings of new words as they encounter them within a text. This method promotes independent learning and helps students to understand how words function in different contexts, leading to a more robust vocabulary acquisition compared to direct instruction, rote memorization, or decontextualized drills.11.Which of the following sentence structures is commonly used in high school English to emphasize the importance of the subject?A. Active voiceB. Passive voiceC. Inverted sentence structureD. Future perfect tenseAnswer: A. Active voiceExplanation: The active voice is often used in high school English to emphasize the importance of the subject and to make the sentence sound more direct and forceful. It is particularly useful in academic and formal writing.12.What is the main purpose of using a narrative structure in a high school English classroom?A. To provide a detailed explanation of a conceptB. To encourage critical thinking and analysisC. To engage students in storytelling and creative expressionD. To assess students’ understand ing of grammatical rulesAnswer: C. To engage students in storytelling and creative expression Explanation: A narrative structure, such as a story or a personal anecdote, is often used in high school English classrooms to engage students in storytelling and creative expression. This helps to make the learning experience more enjoyable and relatable, while also promoting critical thinking and analysis.13、Which of the following teaching methods is most suitable for developing students’ listening skills in a high school English class?A)Grammar-Translation MethodB)Communicative Language TeachingC)Audio-Lingual MethodD)Task-Based Language TeachingAnswer: CExplanation: The Audio-Lingual Method, also known as the Aural-Oral Approach, emphasizes listening and speaking skills through repetition and drills. It is particularly effective for developing listening comprehension, as students are exposed to a large amount of spoken language and are encouraged to imitate and repeat it. This method aligns well with the goal of improving listening skills in a high school English class.14、Which educational technology tool can be effectively used to differentiate instruction and cater to individual learning needs in a high school English classroom?A)WhiteboardB)TextbooksC)Online Learning PlatformsD)ChalkboardsAnswer: CExplanation: Online Learning Platforms, such as learning management systems (LMS) or educational websites, offer a wide range of resources and tools that can be tailored to individual students’ needs. Teachers can creat e personalized learning paths, assign differentiated tasks, and track student progress, all of which contribute to effective differentiation of instruction. In contrast, while whiteboards, textbooks, and chalkboards are all essential tools in the classroom, they do not offer the same level of flexibility and personalizationas online learning platforms.15、Which of the following sentences correctly uses the subjunctive mood to express a wish or a hypothetical situation?A) If I was richer, I would travel more.B) I wish I am taller.C) She suggested that he is more careful next time.D) It is essential that she be on time for the interview.E) If they were here yesterday, we would have seen them.Answer: D) It is essential that she be on time for the interview. Explanation: The subjunctive mood is used in clauses beginning with “it is important/necessary/essential/suggested” etc., followed by “that”. The correct form in these cases is “be” rather than “is”. Option D is the only one that correctly employs this usage of the subjunctive.16、Identify the type of clause in bold in the sentence below:“The students, although they had studied hard, did not pass the exam.”A) Independent ClauseB) Dependent Adverbial ClauseC) Relative ClauseD) Nominal ClauseE) None of the aboveAnswer: A) Independent ClauseExplanation: The clause “did not pass the exam” can stand alone as a completethought and does not depend on the rest of the sentence to convey its meaning. Therefore, it is an independent clause. However, it is worth noting that the entire sentence is complex because it contains an additional clause “a lthough they had studied hard,” which is a dependent adverbial clause modifying the independent clause. The question focuses on the bolded part, which remains an independent clause despite being part of a larger structure.17、The sentence “The book was lyi ng on the table for a week before I noticed it.” illustrates which aspect of English grammar?A. Verb tenseB. Word orderC. Subject-verb agreementD. Sentence structureAnswer: A. Verb tenseExplanation: The sentence shows the use of the past continuous tense (“was lying”) to describe an action that began in the past and continued up to a specific past time (“for a week before I noticed it”).18、In the following sentence, which word is a gerund?A. “Reading is the best way to improve your vocabulary.”B. “I enjoy to play soccer with my friends.”C. “The children were laughing loudly.”D. “He stopped to watch the movie.”Answer: A. “Reading is the best way to improve your vocabulary.”Explanation: A gerund is a verb form that acts as a noun. In option A, “Reading” is the gerund that serves as the subject of the sentence. Options B and D use infinitives (“to play” and “to watch”), while option C uses a present participle (“laughing”).19、Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of effective English classroom management?A. Clear rules and expectationsB. Frequent disruptions and distractionsC. Positive reinforcement for good behaviorD. Active student engagementAnswer: BExplanation: Effective classroom management in English language teaching involves setting clear rules and expectations (A), providing positive reinforcement for good behavior (C), and fostering active student engagement (D). Frequent disruptions and distractions (B) hinder learning and are not a characteristic of effective classroom management.20、Which teaching method encourages students to work in pairs or small groups to complete tasks and communicate their ideas?A. Direct instructionB. Cooperative learningC. AudiolingualismD. Silent wayAnswer: BExplanation: Cooperative learning (B) is a teaching method that involves students working in pairs or small groups to complete tasks and communicate their ideas. This approach promotes student interaction, collaboration, and communication skills. Direct instruction (A) typically involves the teacher delivering information to students. Audiolingualism (C) focuses on language learning through imitation and repetition of language structures. The Silent Way (D) is a method that emphasizes minimal teacher intervention and allows students to discover language rules through their own exploration.21、Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of an effective lesson plan?A) Clearly defined learning objectivesB) Flexible timing and activitiesC) Overly detailed instructions that leave no room for adjustmentD) Assessment methods aligned with the learning objectivesCorrect Answer: C) Overly detailed instructions that leave no room for adjustmentExplanation: An effective lesson plan should be detailed enough to guide the teacher through the lesson but flexible enough to allow for adjustments based on student needs and classroom dynamics. Overly detailed instructions can hindera teacher’s ability to adapt the le sson in real-time.22、In the context of teaching English as a second language, which methodemphasizes the use of the target language exclusively and often involves direct correction of errors?A) The Communicative ApproachB) The Grammar-Translation MethodC) The Direct MethodD) The Audio-Lingual MethodCorrect Answer: C) The Direct MethodExplanation: The Direct Method is characterized by teaching exclusively in the target language and focuses on direct association between words and objects or actions, often involving immediate correction of errors to reinforce correct usage. This contrasts with other approaches such as the Communicative Approach, which may allow more flexibility and less focus on error correction.23.In the following sentence, the word “elaborate” is used to describe:A. the simple design of the buildingB. the complex structure of the machineC. the straightforward explanation of the conceptD. the quick preparation of the projectAnswer: BExplanation: The word “elaborate” means to plan or make something with great care and detail. In this context, it suggests a complex structure, making option B the correct answer.24.Which of the following sentence structures is an example of a subordinateclause?A. The students went to the library because it was raining.B. The students are going to the library.C. It was raining, so the students went to the library.D. The library is a place where students study.Answer: AExplanation: A subordinate clause is a dependent clause that cannot stand alon e as a sentence and must be part of a main clause. In option A, “because it was raining” is a subordinate clause that explains the reason for the students going to the library.25、Which of the following teaching methods best encourages students’ critical thinking in English language teaching?A) Grammar Translation MethodB) Communicative Language TeachingC) Audio-Lingual MethodD) Direct MethodAnswer: BExplanation: The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) method focuses on developing students’ ability to use language for real-life communication. It emphasizes meaning over form and encourages students to engage in authentic communication tasks that promote critical thinking, as they have to analyze, evaluate, and respond to various situations and viewpoints. The GrammarTranslation Method (A) focuses mainly on grammar and translation, limiting opportunities for critical thinking. The Audio-Lingual Method (C) emphasizes repetition and pattern drills, which may not directly foster critical thinking. The Direct Method (D), while promoting communication, may not explicitly encourage critical analysis of language use.26、When designing a lesson plan for teaching English literature to high school students, which of the following elements should be prioritized to enhance students’ understanding and appreciation of the text?A) Vocabulary buildingB) Grammar explanationsC) Textual analysis and discussionD) Memorization of key plot pointsAnswer: CExplanation: When teaching English literature to high school students, prioritizing textual analysis and discussion (C) is crucial for enhancing their understanding and appreciation of the text. This involves exploring themes, characters, symbolism, literary devices, and the author’s intent, which deepens students’ engag ement with the work and encourages critical thinking. Vocabulary building (A) and grammar explanations (B) are important linguistic aspects, but they should serve to support the overall comprehension and analysis of the literature, rather than being the primary focus. Memorization of key plot points (D), though necessary to some extent, is less effective in fostering anuanced understanding and appreciation of the text.27、Which of the following best describes the use of the Present Continuous tense in English?A)To describe actions that are happening at the moment of speaking.B)To describe habitual actions.C)To describe completed actions.D)To describe future intentions or plans.Answer: A) To describe actions that are happening at the moment of speaking.Explanation: The Present Continuous tense is primarily used to express actions that are occurring at the time of speech or around this time, even if not exactly at the moment of speaking. Options B and D can also be correct under certain contexts but are not the primary use, while option C is incorrect as completed actions are usually described using the Perfect tenses.28、In the context of teaching vocabulary, which activity would be most effective for helping students understand and remember idiomatic expressions?A)Memorizing the dictionary definitions of the idioms.B)Using the idioms in sentences that reflect real-life situations.C)Translating the idioms directly from English into the students’ native language.D)Focusing solely on the literal meaning of the idioms.Answer: B) Using the idioms in sentences that reflect real-life situations.Explanation: Understanding idiomatic expressions often requires more than just knowing the definition; it requires seeing them used in context. By using idioms in sentences that reflect real-life situations, students can better grasptheir meaning and learn how to apply them appropriately. Options A and C may help with initial understanding but do not facilitate practical usage, and option D is misleading since idioms rarely follow literal interpretations.29.In the following sentence, which word is used as a demonstrative pronoun?A. This is a wonderful book. (This)B. She will be here tomorrow. (She)C. We have three cats and two dogs. (We)D. The sun is shining brightly. (The)Answer: DExplanation: In this sentence, “The” is used as a demonstrative pronoun to refer to a specific object, in this case, the sun. The other options are articles or pronouns but not used as demonstrative pronouns.30.Which of the following sentences is an example of a simple sentence structure?A. She can play the guitar, sing, and dance well.B. Although it is raining, we will go out.C. If I win the lottery, I will travel the world.D. The students are working on their projects, the teachers are marking their exams, and the principal is in her office.Answer: AExplanation: A simple sentence structure consists of a single independent clause with a subject and a predicate. In option A, “She can play the guitar, sing,and dance well” is a simple sentence as it has one independent clause with a clear subject (“She”) and predicate (“can play, sing, and dance well”). The other options contain compound or complex sentences with more than one independent or dependent clause.二、简答题(20分)Sure, I can generate an example of a short-answer question for the “High School English Subject Knowledge and Teaching Ability Test” that would be suitable for assessing a teacher candidate’s understanding of English language teaching at the high school level. Here’s an example:Short Answer QuestionQuestion:Explain the importance of incorporating literature into the high school English curriculum. In your answer, include how literature can support language development, cultural literacy, and critical thinking skills among students.Answer:Incorporating literature into the high school English curriculum is essential for several key reasons. Firstly, literature serves as a rich source of language input, exposing students to a variety of vocabulary, sentence structures, and writing styles, which supports their language development. By reading texts that model correct grammar and usage, students can enhance their own written and spoken communication skills.Secondly, literature acts as a gateway to cultural literacy. Through exposure to different genres and periods of literature, students gain insight into the historical contexts and cultural values that have shaped societies. This fosters an appreciation for diversity and helps students develop empathy by understanding multiple perspectives.Lastly, literature is instrumental in developing critical thinking skills. Analyzing texts requires students to engage with complex ideas, themes, and character motivations, encouraging them to think deeply about the material and make connections between the text and the world around them. Literature also provides opportunities for discussion and debate, further honing students’ analytical and argumentative abilities.Explanation:This answer highlights the multifaceted benefits of literature in education, emphasizing its role in language acquisition, cultural awareness, and cognitive development. It addresses the holistic impact of literature on student growth, aligning with educational goals that seek to produce well-rounded individuals who are not only proficient in language but also culturally informed and analytically astute.三、教学情境分析题(30分)Teaching Scenario Analysis QuestionQuestion:As a high school English teacher, you are preparing a lesson on the theme of “Cultural Differences”. Your class consists of 20 students, with a diverse range of cultural backgrounds. You have decided to use a group discussion activity to engage your students in exploring the topic. However, during the activity, you notice that some students are struggling to participate actively due to language barriers and a lack of familiarity with the topic.Task:1.Analyze the teaching scenario and identify the challenges you might face.2.Propose strategies to address these challenges and ensure that all students are actively involved in the group discussion.Answer:1.Analysis of Teaching Scenario:The challenges in this teaching scenario include:•Language barriers for some students, which may hinder their ability to express themselves effectively.•Cultural differences that might make certain students feel uncomfortable or hesitant to share their perspectives.•Potential dominance of certain students, who may speak more confidently due to their language proficiency or cultural familiarity.2.Strategies to Address Challenges:nguage Support:•Assign a language helper to each group who can assist students with language difficulties.•Provide a list of key vocabulary and phrases related to cultural differences, which students can use during the discussion.•Encourage students to use simple, clear language and avoid complex sentence structures.b.Cultural Sensitivity:•Before the activity, introduce the concept of cultural differences and discuss how to respect and appreciate various cultures.•Create a safe and inclusive environment where students feel comfortable sharing their opinions without fear of judgment.•Assign topics that are neutral and do not favor any specific culture, allowing students to express their viewpoints without bias.c.Facilitator Role:•Actively participate in the discussion by asking questions, encouraging participation, and ensuring that all students have a chance to speak.•Monitor the discussion and intervene if necessary to address any dominance issues or language barriers.•Provide positive feedback and encouragement to all students, regardless of their level of participation.Explanation:By implementing these strategies, the teacher can address the challenges in the teaching scenario and ensure that all students are actively involved in the group discussion. Language support will help students express their thoughts more effectively, while cultural sensitivity will promote a respectful and inclusive environment. The teacher’s facilitation role willensure that the discussion remains balanced and engaging for all students.四、教学设计题(40分)Section IV: Teaching Design (40 points)Question 1 (40 points):Design a lesson plan for a 90-minute class session on Shakespeare’s play “Romeo and Juliet” aimed at high school students (grades 10-12). Your lesson should focus on developing students’ critical thinking skills through textual analysis and discussion. Include the following components:1.Learning Objectives: What do you expect your students to achieve by the end of this lesson?2.Materials Needed: List any necessary materials or resources.3.Introduction: How will you introduce the topic to engage the students?4.Development Activities: Describe activities that will help students meet the learning objectives.5.Assessment: How will you assess student understanding during and at the end of the lesson?6.Closure: How will you conclude the lesson?Answer and Analysis:1.Learning Objectives:•Students will analyze key passages from Act I of “Romeo and Juliet” to understand the themes of love and fate.•Students will demonstrate their ability to interpret dramatic text by participating in role-playing exercises.•Students will articulate their interpretations of the characters’ motivations and the play’s themes in written form.2.Materials Needed:•Copies of “Romeo and Juliet” (Act I)•Writing materials (pencils, paper, etc.)•Projector and screen (for displaying text and related videos)•Handouts with discussion questions•Access to supplementary material such as video clips or online resources3.Introduction:Begin the class by showing a short clip from a film adaptation of “Romeo and Juliet” focusing on scenes from Act I. Ask students to jot down their initial impressions and any questions they have about the characters or plot. Follow up with a brief introduction to Shakespeare’s life and the historical context of the play.4.Development Activities:•Guided Reading: Distribute copies of Act I and guide students through a close reading, highlighting key passages and discussing theirsignificance.•Group Work: Divide the class into small groups and assign each group a scene from Act I. Instruct them to discuss the scene, focusing on character development and thematic elements.。
2024年教师资格考试高级中学英语学科知识与教学能力复习试题及答案指导一、单项选择题(本大题有30小题,每小题2分,共60分)1、According to the National Curriculum Standards for English, which of the following is not a key objective for senior high school English teaching?A. Developing students’ comprehensive language skillsB. Enhancing students’ critical thinking and problem-solving abilitiesC. Fostering students’ appreciation of Chinese cultureD. Promoting students’ cultural awareness and intercultural communication答案:C解析:根据《普通高中英语课程标准》,高中英语教学的关键目标包括:培养学生综合语言运用能力、提高学生的思维能力和解决问题的能力、培养学生的文化意识和跨文化交际能力。
选项C提到的“培养学生的中国文化的欣赏”并非高中英语教学的关键目标。
因此,答案为C。
2、In a lesson on “Fahrenheit 451”, the teacher wants to guide students to analyze the novel’s themes. Which of the following meth ods would be the most effective in this situation?A. Directly explaining the themes to studentsB. Giving a detailed summary of the novelC. Encouraging students to create their own summaries of the novel and discuss the themesD. Asking students to write a critical essay about the novel答案:C解析:在分析《 Fahrenheit 451》这部小说的主题时,教师应该鼓励学生主动参与,培养他们的批判性思维。
中小学副高级教师职称英语全英答辩模拟题(四)1.The purpose of middle school English teaching is to improve the students’four skills of listening,Speaking,reading and writing,with the base of necessavy pnonetics. Large vocabulary and good grammar, but this is not the final purpose. The final purpose is to let sbudents to be able to use the language.2.比较规范的教学目标三例:①The students can describe the differences between active voice and passive voice.②The students can summarize the main idea of the text by careful reading③The students will be able to find the main idea and important deatails of text by reading and discussing.教学难点范列:How to identify the differences between present perfect Tense and Simple past Tense.3.如何布置英语作业:assign(布置)1、Focus on students’ interest.2、Pay attentien to level of students.3、Pay attention to creative and variety4. How to deal with textbook.1、Meet the curriculum standards2、To be based on teaching objectives.3、To meet the student’s cognitiue rules /kognitiv/ 认知的4、Overall consideration. (通盘考虑)5、Close to the student’s life.6、Pay attention to details.5.How to deal with student-centred Teaching?①.Use various ways in class to make students confident.②.Teach the students some technigues,give them more chance to learn. Self-study habits are important.③.Encourage Ss to communicate with others by using what they have learned in this class.④.Cultivate Ss’ abilities of listening.Speaking, reading, writing and their good sense of the English language.⑤.We should try to understand the way they think.like them and respect them. Try to make friends with them.6.The purpose of reading is to get the correct and useful informatian. Students should hot only have a high speed of reading but also have a correct understanding of details7.Discussion purpose:Train their ability of analysis and comprehension, and cultivate their spirit of cooperation and benefit a lot in their spoken English.8.Studying ways:Observation-imitation-practice-production . In order to guide the Ss better and better develop the Ss’abilities,the Ss will learn how to be a good language learner through the four steps above and how to communicate with others in this lesson as good stydying ways are helpful for their lifelong study.9.①purpose of Renision design:To review the old knowledge can make it easier for students to learn new knowledge.②purpose of presentation design:This step is employed to make the Ss get the general idea of the target language.At the same time let the Ss have a chance to practice their listening and spoken ability.③purpose of listening practice:It gives Ss practive in understanding the target language in spoken conversations.④purpose of pairawork design:Task-based teaching method is used here to develop Ss’ability of communication and also their ability of co-operation will be well trained.⑤.purpose of summary design: At the end of the class,We should help the Ss to summarize what we have learned in this lesson.⑥.purpose of Homework :It is necessary for the Ss to do same extensive exercises after class to consolidate the knowledge they learned.10.①教材充分体现”以人为本”的科学发展观,即面向全体又关注并体现学生的个体差异。
中职生身份认同英语作文Title: Identity Recognition of Vocational School Students。
In the journey of self-discovery, one's identity plays a pivotal role in shaping their perceptions, behaviors, and aspirations. For vocational school students, this aspect of identity recognition holds particular significance. Here, I delve into the multifaceted dimensions of identity among vocational school students and explore its implications.Firstly, the identity of vocational school students is often intricately linked with their chosen field of study. Unlike traditional academic paths, vocational education emphasizes hands-on skills and practical knowledge. Therefore, students in vocational schools tend to develop a strong vocational identity associated with their specific trade or profession. Whether it be automotive engineering, culinary arts, or graphic design, their sense of self is deeply rooted in their craft.Moreover, societal perceptions and stereotypes surrounding vocational education can significantly impact students' identity formation. Despite the increasing recognition of the importance of vocational skills, there still exists a lingering stigma attached to vocational education. This societal bias may lead some students to grapple with feelings of inferiority or self-doubt regarding their career choices. However, overcoming these stereotypes can foster a stronger sense of pride and identity among vocational school students.Furthermore, the educational environment within vocational schools plays a crucial role in shapingstudents' identity. Vocational institutions often foster a sense of camaraderie and community among students pursuing similar career paths. This shared experience cultivates a supportive network where students can exchange knowledge, skills, and encouragement. Additionally, the practical nature of vocational education fosters a hands-on learning environment where students can directly apply their skills, reinforcing their vocational identity.Beyond the confines of the classroom, extracurricular activities and vocational competitions provide avenues for vocational school students to showcase their talents and skills. Participating in such events not only boosts students' confidence but also reinforces their sense of belonging within their respective fields. Winning accolades or recognition in these competitions can further validate students' vocational identity and propel them towardsfuture success.However, it is essential to recognize that identity is not static and can evolve over time. As vocational school students transition into the workforce, they may encounter new challenges and opportunities that shape their identity. Whether through internships, apprenticeships, or entry-level positions, real-world experiences allow students to refine their skills and discover their strengths and passions. This ongoing process of self-discovery contributes to the dynamic nature of vocational students' identity.In conclusion, the identity recognition of vocational school students is a multifaceted journey influenced by various factors, including their chosen field of study, societal perceptions, educational environment, and real-world experiences. Despite facing stereotypes and challenges, vocational school students possess a unique sense of identity rooted in practical skills and hands-on learning. By embracing their vocational identity and leveraging their talents, these students can carve out successful and fulfilling careers in their chosen professions.。
Students Interacting through a Cognitive Apprenticeship Learning EnvironmentJakob TholanderAbstract: This paper reports on a study in which computer science students interacted in a learning environment for object-oriented (oo) modeling. The learning environment used in this study support aspects such as reflection and authentic use of expert language and tools. The analysis focuses on students’ activities, the results of their activities,and on their interaction with each other and with the tools in the learning environment. The analysis indicate taht the students’ reasoning is changed when using the learning environment. Students start to focus on different aspects in themodeling process compared to students who do not use the learning environment.IntroductionOO-modeling is open-ended in nature and solutions to problems depend upon the particular context, goals,and enterprise and is a method for describing the information enterprises need for design and construction of supporting communication and information systems . A learning environment was designed based on cognitive apprenticeship learning ideas (Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989) and with the intention of sup-porting learners to engage in a kind of reasoning that is similar to that of experienced oo-modelers. In cog-nitive apprenticeship and situated cognition has argued for designers of learning environments to see learning as the collaborative construction of understanding in social contexts (Wilson & Myers, 2000).(Pea, 1992) uses the term ‘learning discourse’ to denote learners’ ability to participate in relevant conver-sations and using the concepts they are learning. The learning environment in this study focuses on aspects related to the notion of learning discourse such as reflection and authentic use of expert language and tools.The learning environment consists of three tools supporting different aspects of cognitive apprenticeship and of oo-reasoning. For more detailed descriptions of the design of these tools see (Karlgren, Tholander,Dahlqvist, & Ramberg, 1998), (Tholander, Karlgren, Rutz, & Ramberg, 1999). The tools are a pedagogical assistant, a library of modeling patterns, and problem-solving tracks illustrating reasoning of experienced modeler and are integrated with a commercial modeling tool for designing oo-models.The pedagogical assistantThe pedagogical assistant has the form of an animated character and is placed on the side of the modeling tool. It poses remarks in text and speech to the students’ concerning their modeling. The remarks mostly concern if the students can represent different aspects of the problem domain in their solution, e.g., “Are you sure you have modeled that airplanes might be redirected from their original destination”. When the as-sistant has a remark it indicates this to the students and they can attend to the remark if they want to. The design intentions behind the assistant is to support learners’ metacognition by making them reflect and think critically about the solution they are creating and about their reasoning (Tholander et al., 1999).The pattern libraryThe library of modeling patterns is a resource to help students solving tasks in the modeling tool. Modeling patterns are prototypical solutions to problems that have shown to occur frequently in oo-modeling, design,and programming (Fowler, 1997) (Gamma, Helm, Johnson, & Vlissides, 1995). They are presented graphi-cally, with textual descriptions, and a video recording with examples of how each pattern is used. The pat-terns can be automatically inserted into the students’ model and can be accessed both through the assistant Picture 1: The Pattern library Picture 2: Expert track Picture 3: The assistantand separately through the interface of the modeling tool. The intention of the design of the pattern library is that students should practice solving problems with the tools and terminology that experienced modelers use, and further to support students in actively using and creating abstractions in their solutions. We see modeling patterns as an important aspect of the language that experienced modelers use to reason and con-struct models with. The pattern library is a way to support students to include important aspects of the do-main they are learning in their learning discourse.Expert Problem Solving TracksThe expert tracks are extracts from solutions to problems (similar to the ones the students were given) solved by experienced modelers. The intention of the design of the tracks is to illustrate the problem solv-ing process the experience modelers goes through in solving their problems. The focus is on giving an authentic account of their reasoning in order to support students to get insights to the reasoning of experi-enced oo-modelers. This includes reasoning that is later rejected as well as reasoning that takes them closer to the final solution, in order to make the tracks as ‘authentic’ as possible. The format of this is detailed ac-counts of their talk and drawings they make during their modeling.Method55 second and third year computer science and electro-technology students aged 22-40 at the Royal Insti-tute of Technology in Stockholm participated in the study. They were offered to take part in the study as an extra credit exercise at the course “Information Systems Design”. The exercise was given at about two-thirds of the course when they were expected to have completed 50-75 percent of a group project. Students were given a modeling exercise to solve and were video recorded while working on the exercise. We had made the exercise too extensive for the students to complete during the session, to make sure that it would be challenging to all of them. The students were divided into a tool and a control group where the tool group had access to the learning environment tools during their modeling and the control group only used the modeling tool. All students were given the same exercise, which was to construct an object ori-ented model for a fictitious terrorist organization that needed to build an information system to manage the planning and execution of airplane hijacking operations. The students worked in pairs, except four that worked alone, and two groups of three. Altogether 30 sessions were conducted with students modeling for 45 minutes, however only 27 sessions are reported here since we used the first three as a pilot study. All students started solving the exercise by only using the modeling tool without access to the learning envi-ronment. After fifteen minutes the tool groups were asked to go through the expert tracks during fifteen minutes and then continue modeling for thirty minutes while using the learning environment tools. The other groups continued to model without any support during the whole session.Method of analysisWhen new models of learning are brought into the design process, what students should be learning is often redefined. In the case of cognitive apprenticeship this involves a shift from focusing on concepts and pro-cedures to a focus on students’ ability to participate in social practices (Greeno, 1997). Interaction analysis as described in (Jordan & Henderson, 1995) focuses on studying learning and understanding as socially and culturally situated activities and can focus on different aspects of human action, from activities of individu-als to the social organization of the activities.In rich video material of the kind collected here the possible aspects to analyze is numerous and varying. It is therefore important to find a focus that matches the goals of the study (Goodwin & Duranti 1992). The tools studied here are designed to achieve a particular way of reasoning as a means to support students’learning. The goal has therefore been to reach an understanding of the reasoning that students engage rather than if any learning is occurring. This is done by analyzing three aspects of the students’ interaction and the results of that interaction to achieve methodological triangulation (Reeves, 1997).The first focus analyses the character of the students’ models with respect to two different dimensions in the modeling process. We took snapshots of the character of the models during the modeling sessions. The first dimension concerns the amount of detail in the model, e.g., how many attributes or relation names have been included in the model. The second dimension concerns how much, what we call, component-likeness a model has. A component like model has a character of building blocks which can be removed, modified, and combined with other building blocks and is closely related to the idea of modeling patterns. However, a component like model does not have to include any of the modeling patterns from the pattern library or from textbooks. The characterizations were done at two stages in the modeling process, after 15 minutes ofmodeling and at the end of the session. This allowed us to see how the models of the students using the tools changed compared to the control group. We also analyzed other aspects related to these issues such as how they were organized, what constructs the students used, and how complete the final models were.The second focus of analysis concerns the character of the modelers’ activities during the modeling sessions with respect to the two dimensions of component-likeness and detailedness. The purpose of this was to see if the students worked with larger pieces of the information in the enterprise being modeled or with singular concepts only. Further, we wanted to see that the students not just proceeded linearly from concept to con-cept but rather that they were able to meaningfully connect different parts of a model.An important aspect of the cognitive apprenticeship learning model is the development of efficient problem solving strategies (Collins et al., 1989). We therefore analyzed how the initial time period in the modeling sessions affected the rest of the session, and particularly how it affected the component-likeness and the detailedness of their models. What we call strategic classes was central for the progress of their modeling.The third focus is on the conversations between the subjects. It analyses the character of their talk with each other with and their interaction with the tools. Similarly the reasoning of the students not using the tools was analyzed and comparisons were made concerning the differences of their activities. Their use of lan-guage and concepts of modeling practice in their argumentation and constructions was also identified.Results: Focusing on Students’ modelsWe hypothesized that the change with respect to the detailedness and component-likeness of the models would be greater for the tool group. We expected that the models of the tool groups would shift focus to in-clude more aspects of component-likeness which would also give the their models a less detailed character.Component-likeness and detailednessFigure 1 shows the level of component-likeness for each of the groups. The graphs indicate that the tool group more often than the control group changed their modeling style after the first 15 minutes. Especiallyinteresting is that some groups, for instance, 3, 8, and 16 have changed their modeling style with respect to this dimension quite radically. In the control group several groups also changed their modeling style throughout the session but not to same as extent as some of the tool groups.Figure 2: The detailedness of the modelsFigure 1: The component-likeness of the models234234234In Figure 2 the detailedness of the models are shown. For the control group one can see that this dimension was mostly unaffected throughout the session as none of the groups show any significant changes in their modeling style. For the tool group several of the groups have significantly lower values at the end of the session compared to after 15 minutes. The two models in Figure 3 show a group’s model after 15 minutes and at the end of the session. Here it is evident that the focus has shifted from a few classes with a lot of at-tributes at the beginning to a higher level of classes and relations at the end.Figure 3: A group’s models after 15 minutes (left)and at end of session (right)The graphs for component-likeness and detailedness both seem to indicate that the tool groups change their modeling towards a stronger focus on higher level aspects of modeling such as use of patterns and that more detailed aspects such as attributes and mapping are given a lower priority. This is inline with our hy-pothesis that the tool groups reasoning would be more component-like and is further investigated below. Organization and structure of modelsMost groups organized around the concept of a flight which was made the central class from which most other classes were derived and developed. Flight was indeed central to the task but for several groups an overemphasis on expanding this class has caused them to neglect other concepts of equal importance. Con-cepts such as hijacking operation, resources, and planing were often not as elaborated as needed, although they were also central for the task. An obvious reason for this was that one of the first concepts discussed in the exercise were flights and concepts related to that and this made the students focus on that. However, we believe the main reason that flight was given a central place was that throughout the task the students elaborated concepts that they were previously familiar with, such as flights, airplanes, and airlines rather than concepts they were unfamiliar with. Less familiar concepts such as hijackings and planning and scheduling required more effort to complete and were therefore not as elaborated as the familiar concepts. Many groups have structured their models around two constructions that had been emphasized during the course, so called inheritance hierarchies and copy-template structures. However, in several cases they used the constructions in atypical ways and in unusual situations. Most of the models created contained elements from these two kinds of constructions. One mistake often made among the students was that they mixed up different constructs in their models. Several groups used copy-template constructions together with inheri-tance hierarchies. Generally these two constructions should not be mixed together as they are different ways to model similar problems. One could also see an extensive use of inheritance hierarchies. Almost all groups used an inheritance structure to model person, crew, passenger, etc, even though this would have been as efficiently modeled with a copy-template construction. We hypothesize that this is because people are used to such way of structuring things in the world, from for instance natural science and everyday lan-guage, and therefore prefer representations they can relate too easier (see also section Strategic concepts). This kind of behavior matches the description of learning as legitimate peripheral participation by (Lave & Wenger, 1991). The students practice using the constructions that they have observed experienced modelers use during the course and from the learning tools. Lave & Wenger describe this as an enculturation process where students carry out the same kind of activities with the same tools and concepts as experienced mod-elers use. The students practice using the kind of constructs used in the oo-modeling community even though they do not have the ability to fully understand the usage of the concepts in these activities. Of course, in the situation studied here the experienced modelers are not physically present but the students can still have access to aspects of their reasoning. Further, we saw that the tool groups used such constructs to a larger extent than the control groups even for constructs that both the test groups and the control groups knew. This indicates that the tools provide scaffolding in the enculturation process of using the languageand tools of experienced modelers. By giving students access to more such constructs to use during their modeling we can bring their learning discourse closer to what we strive for.Completeness of modelsA natural expectation in a study like this would be that the groups using the tools would solve the problems quicker and better, but this was not the case. Rather the groups using the tools often got into deep and re-flective discussions concerning different aspects of their models and therefor proceeded slower. Groups working without the tools instead were focused on coming up with quick solutions. Further, the students’working on their own often felt that they completed the task in a shorter time period than the other groups. (Bell & Davis, 2000) call the reflection prompts that they face learners with for “learning speed bumps” to illustrate how their learning support aim at slowing down the problem solving process to support learners’meta-cognition. Our learning environment seem to play a similar role.Results: Focusing on students’ modeling processesWe identified two dominant ways of starting out to solve the problem, a general and a specific. In the gen-eral way of starting out the students laid out classes that they thought would be useful for solving the exer-cise, usually those were flight, airline, airplane, person, pilot and then created relations between these. In the specific way of starting the students laid out only one or two classes and instead focused on adding at-tributes to those classes, e.g., number of passengers, engine type, manufacturing year, to the class airplane. The general approach to starting out modeling turned out to be more effective with respect to the compo-nent- and detailedness of the models. We believe that this is because this approach provided a set of strate-gic classes to expand the model from. Several of the groups created single classes with five to ten attrib-utes. In some cases the attributes that students had created initially turned out to be more complex than many of the subjects had realized for both types of starting to model. The process of turning these attributes into classes turned out to be difficult for the subjects that had started to model specifically compared to the subjects that had used the general starting approach. The tool groups often broke out of a their detailed modeling strategy as they got access to the tools, see Figure 3.Strategic classes – finding the conceptsOne aspect related to the component-likeness of the models is what we choose to call strategic classes. In many cases, complicated aspects of a problem were solved when one central and strategic class for what was currently being modeled was found. The idea of strategic classes can be seen in several of the patterns in the pattern library and in the expert tracks. In the detailed video analysis we also found that several of the groups that used those two tools had a greater variety of such classes to reason around which made their modeling more efficient (see section below on the students conversations).For instance, two groups used the concept hijacking-strategy as a class to specify the different kinds of hi-jackings that would be used. From this concept one could see that several of the related concepts were much easier to model and the students did not have to rely on specific properties or attributes of a class but instead kept the model at the more general level of classes and relations.Almost every group started modeling concepts that related to airports, flights, and airplanes, and these were also the most elaborated classes in many of the final models, even though some of these did not even have to be represented as classes at all. The obvious reason for this is that these concepts were mentioned early in the exercise description and were indeed central to the task, although from a strict modeling perspective these were no more important than other aspects of the exercise.However, we believe there are other reasons for this that can help understand students’ learning and how we can support their learning. In studies on people’s understanding of scientific concepts it is known that everyday experiences might interfere with the understanding of theoretical concepts (McCloskey, 1983), (diSessa, 1988). Similarly, the concepts that the students started with are all everyday concepts that people use regularly and have well-developed pre-conceptions about. For most people today concepts such as air-planes, flights, and airports are familiar whereas concepts that they did not start modeling and that were less elaborated in the final models do not belong to such everyday concepts. Indications of this could also be seen in how several groups returned to parts of the model containing familiar concepts when they encoun-tered something difficult to solve, such as adding attributes to concepts such as airplanes or airlines.Results: Focusing on students’ conversations and use of learning tools Socio-cultural studies of learning and understanding have shown and argued for how our reasoning is me-diated through artifacts such as technological tools, as well as mental artifacts such as language (Säljö, 1996), (Wertsch, 1998). Here we illustrate how both the virtual (computer based) constructions as well as internalized (mental) modeling constructions are treated as artifacts. This includes analysis of how students without access to any of the computer tools still ‘interacted’ with concepts learnt during the course. Their conversations are greatly influenced by the artifacts they are given to work with and of the artifacts they have learnt. In the transcripts Italics are used to emphasize aspects of their conversations.The four cases illustrate the reasoning of the students’ with as well as without the learning tools. The first case shows how one student use modeling concepts he knows of to strengthen the arguments of his solution to his friend. In the second case a pair of students use concepts from the expert tracks and treat them as su-perior to their own knowledge of modeling concepts. The third case shows how a group uses a pattern to build a structure in order to handle the concept flight and seeks to find a mapping between their own solu-tion and the pattern they have chosen. The fourth case shows how the three tools complement each other and support the students to represent information about resources and planning of hijackings.Case 1: Arguing with modeling conceptsHere, two students reason around how to represent that different kind of flights require different resources. Subject O is hesitant (line10 and 15) towards the solution that T is suggesting but O is repeatedly persuaded by T’s use of modeling concepts (12, 14, 16) in their discussion. This illustrates how they in their reasoning can provide motivation and status to their ideas by using the language of modeling practice.(10)T:(11)O:(12)T:(13)T(14)T:(15)O:(16)T:Does one want it as a separate object or do you think it is enough as an attribute on flights?no, it’s probably its own, did you intend to call it resource or resources?Mmm, or, I thought of writing an isa-relation, if it is a transatlantic or a non-transatlantic flight and make it an isa relation to flights. One could do that, I think. And then one can store specific d ata there. [Creates classes “transatlantic flight” and then “non transatlantic flight”]What do you think about that? And then we isa relate to flight, it really is a flight. Data that is general for flight is also valid for these, actually general data, while you want to create unique objects too store how many people is needed for such a flight compared to such a flight.so it’s always the same for all non transatlantic? Or? … (inaudible)noo, but since they only discuss that in the text I thought. Of course one could come up with something smarter but it is the basic idea I am after. Some flights, a flight always has start and an end time. Some-thing which is general for flights only while these two here really have something unique for flights that are transatlantic and those within europe. Then if there are unique ones for such going to other countries and stuff then one can specify that then.At a later point O again tries to contradict (lines 29, 31, 33) the solution created by T by suggesting to use a reification (line 31) but T convinces O about his solution by referring to modeling concepts such as gener-alization and copy-template structures in his argumentation (lines 37 and 40). From an experienced model-ers point of view the solution suggested by O would probably have been the most appropriate in this case but T’s argumentation made O accept his solution.(29)O:(30)T:(31) O(32): T(33)O:(34)T :(35)T:(36)O(37)T:But the question is now, are these the only resources that will, that they want to storeNo, I think there are loads of other one want to store, eh, but all flights have fuel, but this have more fuel, then there are for instance …But isn’t it better to create one called resource and then reification between theseYeah, but what object do you want in that reificationIf one draws, if one creates one called resource and draws from there, a flight has many [points at screen] MmmAnd a bunch is isa from that [points again]But why, what is the benefit of thatReally, this is kind of a copy-template structure. We store some information that is general for all flights here while we store unique information for the different types of flights here then there are certain stuff that is here like food and fuel. That goes generally for all flights, don’t you think?Case 2: Collaborating through the expert tracksHere, two students are triggered to use the expert tracks to solve a problem concerning how resources for a hijacking operation are booked. One can see how they refer to the solution in the tracks in their reasoning. By comparing and trying to find analogies to their own problem they quickly proceed toward solving the problem (line 118-121) they compare the concept of activity in the expert tracks to their concept hijackingand the attributes related to those concepts. Further in lines 126-128 they again map their model to the one in the expert tracks when discussing hijackings and resources.(115)O: (116)T: (117)T: (118)T: (119)T: (120)T: (121)T: (122)O: (123)T: (124)T: (125)O: (126)T: (127)T: (128)T:”reserve certain pieces of equipment”Is that that they have a certain amount of equipment and they can book it for a certain …Book it for a certain …Ahh, okay, let’s look at that [switches to expert tracks]Shall we look at her, we want to look at this with time reservations, right?An activity has a start and an end time [switches back to their own model]A hijacking has a start and an end time, should we enter that? [Adds start and end time and returns to tracks]Should we create one of those [points at the screen]mmm [goes back to their model and creates a new class reserve]Ehh, mmm, no, let’s take reserved, reservedReservation maybeLet’s go [adds start and end time as attributes on reservation and returns to expert tracks]From hijacking to resources [goes back to their model and draws relation from reservation to hi-jacking and reservation to equipment]From hijacking to resources [goes back to expert tracks and then back to their model and changes the direction of the relation between hijacking and reservation]Case 3: Using patterns to create ideasThis case shows how a group realizes that they the need to build a whole structure to represent a particular requirement. They use a pattern to achieve this and use it as a tool to reason with and test ideas around. Even though the pattern they choose is not especially tailored to fit this requirement the possibility to have some thing to reason with helps them to generate and test new ideas. They use the accountability pattern to refer to their own solution (lines 4 - 6) by trying to see analogies and even when they doubt the usefulness of some parts of the pattern (lines 7 - 8) they try to see how it fits their own solution. In line 12 they further seek to find a connection to their own model by mapping the concept organization to airlines.(1)K:(2)T:(3)K:(4)K:(5)T:(6)K:(7)T:(8)K:Should we create a class called Flight?Ehh, ahh, it feels like one have to build a whole structure with that. Because then they also want to know what airline is responsible for the ityes, then we can make one like flight that is included in the …yeah, they had a picture here that was pretty good. Here in a way. If you have flight here and then you have kind of who like who like takes part (points at accountability pattern and the class party) ahh, like person and the pilotsyes, exactlyyeah, that’s how we should do it, but then this class party we might not needoh, yes, parts you now being a part of. I mean if you remember it’s one of those recursive thingsThe pattern they use and the concepts in the pattern are used as something to construct their solution with much more than giving them ready made solution.Case 4: The three tools as resources for problem solvingThis case shows how the three tools support complementary aspects of the problem solving process. The assistant (A) makes the student stop and think about their solution and they realize that they need to adjust the pattern they have inserted into their model (lines 3-12). The comment of the assistant is interpreted as central to their problem and slows down their progression, as they articulate their solution to themselves.(1)A:(2)B:(3)B:(4)C:(5)B:(6)C:(10)B:(11)C:(12)B:“Do you really need all those classes”Well, do we really? Well, let’s see!Implement, ehh, resource allocation, yes we want thatWe want resource allocation, quantity is good, we want resource type, and then we can make isa from that to all people and then maybeYesAnd even, we could need two of this pattern, one that goes to hijacking and one to flights. Pro-posed and implemented action, what is that anyway?The question is if we need it. He asked that. If we really needed all those classesAn action could be like controlling the airplane and that is good.But that’s not really the resource allocation we wanted. Were there any more of those?A couple of turns later they are still not sure how to continue and make use of the way the two experienced modelers, Paul and Maria, solved a problem in the expert tracks to better understand how to use the pattern to solve their own problem. By referring to the tracks (line 4) they articulate aspects of their solution.。