考研英语阅读真题解析

考研英语阅读真题解析

相关推荐

考研英语阅读真题解析

考验英语阅读理解主要考查考⽣理解主旨要义、具体信息、概念性含义，进⾏有关的判断、推理和引申，根据上下⽂推测⽣词的词义等能⼒。下⾯是⼩编给⼤家收集了考研的英语阅读真题以及解析，⼀起来练习⼀下吧!

第⼀篇：

“There is on and only one social responsibility of business,” wrote Milton Friedman, a Nobel prize-winning economist,“That is, to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits.” But even if you accept Friedman’spremise and regard corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies as a waste of shareholders’ money, things may not beabsolutely clear-cut. New research suggests that CSR may create monetary value for companies-at least when they areprosecuted for corruption.

The largest firms in America and Britain together spend more than $15 billion a year on CSR, according to an estimateby EPG, a consulting firm. This could add value to their businesses in three ways. First, consumers may take CSR spendingas a “signal” that a company’s products are of high quality. Second, customers may be willing to buy a company’s productsas an indirect way to donate to the good causes it helps. And third, through a more diffuse “halo effect,” whereby its gooddeeds earn it greater consideration from consumers and others.

Previous studies on CSR have had trouble differentiating these effects because consumers can be affected by all three.Al recent study attempts to separate them by looking at bribery prosecutions under America’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act(FCPA). It argues that since prosecutors do not consume a company’s products as part of their investigations, they could beinfluenced only by the halo effect.

The study found that, among prosecuted firms, those with the most comprehensive CSR programmes tended to get morelenient penalties,. Their analysis ruled out the possibility that it was firm’s political influence, rather than their CSR stand, thataccounted for the leniency: Companies that contributed more to political campaigns did not receive lower fines.

In all, the study concludes that whereas prosecutors should only evaluate a case based on its merits, they do seem to beinfluenced by a company’s record in CSR. “We estimate that either eliminating a substantial labour-rights concern , such aschild labour, or increasing corporate giving byabout20% results in fines that generally are 40% lower than the typicalpunishment for bribing foreign officials”, says one researcher.

Researchers admit that their study does not answer the question of how much businesses ought to spend on CSR. Nordoes it reveal how much companies are banking on the halo effect, rather than the other possible benefits, when they decidetheir do-gooding policies. But at least they have demonstrated that when companies get into trouble with the law, evidence ofgood character can win them less costly punishment.

31.The author views Milton Friedman’s statement about CSR with

【A】tolerance.

【B】skepticism. 【C】uncertainty.

【D】approval.

32.According to Paragraph 2,CSR helps a company by

【A】winning trust from consumers.

【B】guarding it against malpractices.

【C】protecting it from being defamed.

【D】raising the quality of its products.

33. The expression “more lenient ”(line 2,para.4)is closest in meaning to

【A】more effective

【B】less controversial

【C】less severe

【D】more lasting

34. When prosecutors evaluate a case, a company’s CSR regard

【A】has an impact on their decision

【B】comes across as reliable evidence

【C】increases the chance of being penalized

【D】constitutes part of the investigation

35.Which of the following is true of CSR, according to the last paragraph?

【A】 Its negative effects on businesses are often overlooked.

【B】 The necessary amount of companies’ spending on it is unknown.

【C】 Companies’ financial capacity for it has been overestimated.

【D】 It has brought much benefit to the banking industry.

第⼆篇：

Biologists estimate that as many as 2 million lesser prairie chickens---a kind of bird living on stretching grasslands—once lent red to the often gray landscape of the midwestern and southwestern United States. But just some 22,000 birdsremain today, occupying about 16% of the species’ historic range.

The crash was a major reason the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)decided to formally list the bird as threatened.“The lesser prairie chicken is in a desperate situation,” said USFWS Director Daniel Ashe. Some environmentalists,however, were disappointed. They had pushed the agency to designate the bird as “endangered,” a status that gives federalofficials greater regulatory power to crack down on threats. But Ashe and others argued that the“threatened” tag gave thefederal government flexibility to try out new, potentially less confrontational conservations approaches. In particular, theycalled for forging closer collaborations with western state governments, which are often uneasy with federal action and withthe private landowners who control an estimated 95% of the prairie chicken’s habitat.