软件测试计划模板-英文版

软件测试工作流程英语作文Software Testing Workflow。

Software testing is a crucial part of the software development process. It ensures that the software is of high quality and meets the user's requirements. In this article, we will discuss the software testing workflow.1. Test Planning。

Test planning is the first step in the software testing workflow. It involves defining the scope of the testing, identifying the testing objectives, and creating a test plan. The test plan includes the testing strategy, testing schedule, testing resources, and testing tools. The test plan is reviewed and approved by the stakeholders.2. Test Design。

Test design involves creating the test cases. The testcases are based on the requirements and specifications of the software. The test cases cover the different scenarios and use cases of the software. The test cases are reviewed and approved by the stakeholders.3. Test Execution。

软件产品英文测试报告范文Software Product English Test Report SampleSoftware testing is a critical component of the software development lifecycle, ensuring the quality and functionality of the final product. In the context of software products targeting international markets, English testing plays a crucial role in validating the accuracy and fluency of the user-facing content. This report presents the findings of an English test conducted on a software product, highlighting the key areas of focus, the testing methodology, and the recommendations for improvements.The software product under evaluation is a cloud-based project management application designed for small to medium-sized businesses. The application offers a range of features, including task management, team collaboration, and reporting tools. The target audience for this product includes English-speaking users from various regions, making the quality of the English content a top priority.The English testing process was divided into several phases, each focusing on a specific aspect of the product's user interface and documentation. The first phase involved a comprehensive review of the application's menus, buttons, and other user interface elements to ensure the consistent use of English terminology, grammar, and spelling. The second phase focused on the in-app help content, user guides, and other supporting documentation to assess the clarity, flow, and overall quality of the English writing.During the user interface review, the testing team identified several instances of inconsistent terminology usage, grammatical errors, and spelling mistakes. For example, the term "project" was sometimes referred to as "job" or "task" in different parts of the application, creating confusion for users. Additionally, several buttons and menu items contained spelling errors, such as "Calender" instead of "Calendar."The review of the supporting documentation revealed a more significant number of issues, ranging from poor sentence structure and awkward phrasing to the use of colloquial or regional expressions that may not be understood by a global audience. The user guides, in particular, were found to be overly technical and lacked a clear, user-friendly tone, which could hinder the onboarding process for new users.To address these findings, the testing team provided detailed recommendations for improvements, including the following:1. Establish a comprehensive style guide: Develop a detailed style guide that outlines the preferred terminology, grammar, and writing style to be used throughout the product's user interface and documentation. This guide should be consistently applied across all content, ensuring a unified and professional tone.2. Implement a rigorous content review process: Implement a content review process that involves multiple rounds of editing and proofreading by native English speakers. This will help to identify and correct any remaining issues with grammar, spelling, and overall clarity before the content is finalized.3. Enhance the user guide structure and tone: Restructure the user guides to be more user-centric, with a focus on providing clear, step-by-step instructions and explanations. The tone should be more conversational and approachable, making it easier for users to understand and follow the documentation.4. Conduct regular English proficiency testing: Establish a routine process for testing the English proficiency of the product's user interface and documentation, both during the development phase and after major updates. This will help to maintain a high level ofquality and consistency over time.5. Leverage professional translation services: Consider working with professional translation services to ensure that any content that requires localization, such as user interface elements or regional-specific information, is accurately and effectively translated into the target languages.By implementing these recommendations, the software product can significantly improve the quality and consistency of its English content, providing a more seamless and user-friendly experience for its global audience. The investment in high-quality English testing and content development will not only enhance the product's reputation and customer satisfaction but also contribute to its overall success in international markets.。

1. Introduction1)Background2009年，国外A航空公司为适应公司业务需要，加快公司发展，通过B公司设计、开发出一套网上订票系统，以方便旅客出行，提高公司运营效率，提升服务质量，以增加经济效益。

改订票系统将于2010年上半年上线。

为检测系统质量，提高系统的客户满意度，A航空公司与国际知名IT企业HP公司签订合约，希望HP公司能够为A公司的飞机订票系统提供测试服务。

2)Objectives进行客户验收测试，确保完成了所有客户规定的测试需求。

3)Scope登陆、注册、订票、取消订单和退出模块的功能测试、性能测试4)Out of Scope呼叫中心、员工管理、积分管理、会员管理的功能测试、性能测试2. System Overview该航空订票系统是一款集成电话呼叫中心、订票管理、会员管理、积分管理、短信发送、员工管理等强大功能的订票系统，主要用于处理公司客户网上注册、在线咨询、订票、航班查询、票价查询、打印电子账单等100余个业务。

3. Test Environment4. Test Approach1)Test Type功能测试：手动测试自动测试性能测试：负载测试强度测试容量测试2)Test Scenario以整个系统为基准，进行功能测试，包括手动测试、自动测试；性能测试，包括负载测试、强度测试、监测响应时间/吞吐量、百分位报告、比较报告、追踪报告.3)Test CaseTest Case and Test Log.xls!Performance Test Case and Test Log.xls5. Accept Criteria●软件开发已经完成，并全部解决了已知的软件缺陷。

●验收测试计划已经过评审并批准，并且置于文档控制之下。

●对软件需求说明书的审查已经完成。

●对概要设计、详细设计的审查已经完成。

●对所有关键模块的代码审查已经完成。

●对单元、集成、系统测试计划和报告的审查已经完成。

软件过程作文模板英语英文回答：Introduction。

A software process is a set of activities and artifacts that are used to develop and maintain software. It provides a framework for software development and helps to ensure that software is developed in a consistent and efficient manner.Software Process Models。

There are a number of different software process models that can be used. The most common models are:Waterfall model: This is the traditional software development model. It is a linear model that consists of a series of phases, such as requirements gathering, design, implementation, testing, and deployment.Agile model: This is a more iterative and incremental software development model. It involves working in short sprints, and it allows for changes to be made to the software as it is being developed.Spiral model: This is a hybrid software development model that combines elements of both the waterfall and agile models. It is a risk-driven model that allows for iterations of the software development process.Software Process Activities。

Testing PlanIntroductionThe purpose of this document is to outline the testing plan for the project. The objective of testing is to ensure that the software meets the requirements, is free of defects, and performs as expected.ScopeThe testing plan covers all aspects of the software development life cycle, including functional testing, system testing, performance testing, and regression testing.Test ObjectivesThe key objectives of the testing plan are as follows:1.To verify that the software meets the functionalrequirements.2.To ensure that the software works as expected in different environments.3.To evaluate the performance of the software under different circumstances.4.To identify and fix any defects or bugs in the software.5.To ensure that the software is reliable and stable.Testing ApproachThe testing approach will consist of the following phases:1.Requirement analysis: In this phase, the testing team will thoroughly analyze the requirements to understand the scope and functionality of the software.2.Test planning: Based on the requirements analysis, the testing team will develop a test plan which includes test objectives, test cases, test data, and test environment setup.3.Test case development: The testing team will create test cases and test scenarios based on the requirements. These test cases will cover all aspects of the software’s functionality.4.Test execution: In this phase, the test cases will be executed and the results will be recorded. Any defects or bugs found during this phase will be logged and reported.5.Defect tracking and resolution: The defects identified during the test execution phase will be logged and tracked until they are resolved. The testing team will work closely with the development team to fix the defects.6.Retesting and regression testing: After the defects are resolved, the affected areas will be retested to ensure that the fixes have been implemented correctly. Additionally, regression testing will be performed to ensure that existing functionality has not been affected by the fixes.7.Test completion: Once all the test cases have been executedand the defects have been resolved, the testing team will conduct a final round of testing to ensure that the software is ready for release.Test EnvironmentThe test environment will consist of the following components: •Hardware: The software will be tested on different hardware configurations to ensure compatibility and performance.•Software: The software will be tested on different operating systems and browser combinations to ensure compatibility.•Test tools: Various test tools will be used for test case management, defect tracking, and automated testing.Test DeliverablesThe following deliverables will be produced during the testing process:•Test plan: A document outlining the overall testing approach, objectives, and scope.•Test cases: A collection of test cases that will be executed to verify the software’s functionality.•Test reports: Detled reports that summarize the test results, including any defects or bugs found.•Defect log: A log that tracks and documents all reported defects, including their status and resolution.Testing TimelineThe testing activities will be conducted in parallel with the development activities. The testing timeline will be as follows: •Requirement analysis and test planning: 1 week•Test case development: 2 weeks•Test execution and defect tracking: 3 weeks•Retesting and regression testing: 1 week•Final testing and test reports: 1 weekConclusionThe testing plan outlines the approach, objectives, and scope of the testing activities for the project. By following this plan, the development team can ensure that the software meets the requirements and performs as expected. Regular communication and collaboration between the development and testing teams are crucial for the success of the testing process.。

软件测试计划书Software Testing Plan 编号：TMP-STP版本 1.0变更记录填表说明在需求分析阶段开始着手准备测试计划，当需求分析结束后，根据软件项目开发计划书，完成软件测试计划，评审后纳入到基线库。

制定软件测试计划的过程是不断精确细化，逐步完善丰富的过程。

测试计划是测试负责人管理和跟踪的依据，又起到指导测试组的日常工作的作用。

当实际情况与计划偏离到一定程度时，应修正测试计划。

软件测试应按照测试计划制定的内容进行。

测试计划是项目跟踪的依据，通过与实际开发进展情况作比较分析，项目经理可以及时了解项目开发的状态。

测试组中的每个成员都应该明确地知道测试计划的内容，并且对所分配的任务承诺签字，确保计划贯彻执行。

1项目总览1.1基本信息1.2测试方法对测试的方法作整体描述，并针每一组重要特性或特性的组合，说明所采用的测试方法，以确保测试的完备性，及说明测试各组特性的主要任务、技术及工具。

1.3角色及职责职责: 描述各角色具体的职责.1.4人员培训需求说明按技术层次所需的测试人员，并确定为了提供必须技术的培训需求。

1.5假设和约束描述项目计划和执行的假设和约束。

例如指定工具，测试环境，工具或环境的可获得性，人力资源，外部依赖性等影响项目进度、质量的因子.1.6测试项目停止标准参照《软件测试通过标准》, 制定本测试项目的通过或停止准则。

2测试计划2.1计划测试覆盖率测试负责人根据项目需求规格说明书和开发计划书的进度安排估算出本项目的计划测试用例需求覆盖率：％2.2里程碑和提交产品2.3WBS 表2.4工作量估算该项目阶段应与开发计划中阶段划分一致编写测试用例28开发单元测试1040测试功能测试416总计25100 2.5进度安排(时间、人员)2.6项目评审描述按计划需要评审的工作产品，以及采用的评审方式和参加评审的人员。

评审方式是同行评审，评审过程参见《软件评审过程》。

2.7测试环境3测试跟踪计划对测试的跟踪活动也要有计划，跟踪计划描述参与的人员、跟踪活动的名称以及跟踪的频率。

软件开发计划模板英语英文回答：As a software developer, creating a solid software development plan is crucial for the success of any project.A good plan helps to establish clear goals, allocate resources effectively, and ensure that the project stays on track. There are several key components that should be included in a software development plan template.First and foremost, it is important to define the scope of the project. This includes outlining the objectives, deliverables, and timeline for the project. For example, if I am working on a mobile app development project, I would specify the features that need to be included, theplatforms it will be available on, and the expected launch date.Next, it is essential to identify the resources needed for the project. This includes not only the human resources,such as developers, designers, and testers, but also the tools and technologies that will be used. For instance, if I am developing a web application, I would need to list the programming languages, frameworks, and databases that will be utilized.Another important aspect of a software development plan is risk management. It is crucial to identify potential risks that could impact the project and develop strategies to mitigate them. For example, if there is a risk of delays due to external dependencies, I would create a contingency plan to address this issue.Additionally, a good software development plan should include a detailed timeline with milestones and deadlines. This helps to keep the team focused and ensures that the project progresses according to schedule. For instance, I would break down the development process into smaller tasks with specific deadlines to track progress.Communication is also key in a software development plan. It is important to establish clear channels ofcommunication within the team and with stakeholders to ensure that everyone is aligned on the project goals and progress. Regular updates and meetings can help to keep everyone informed and address any issues that may arise.In conclusion, a well-thought-out software development plan is essential for the success of any project. Bydefining the scope, allocating resources, managing risks, setting milestones, and maintaining open communication, the team can work together effectively towards achieving the project goals.中文回答：作为一名软件开发人员，制定一个扎实的软件开发计划对于任何项目的成功至关重要。

<<P ROJECT N AME-I NSTITUTION N AME>>Test PlanDocument Change HistoryVersion Number Date Contributor Description V1.0 What changes (additions anddeletions) were made for thisversion?** Note to Document Author –Red and blue text (with the exception of the title and document name above) in this document is directed at the template user to describe processes, build standards and help build the document from the template. All such red and blue text should be removed before submitting any formal documentation, including both draft and/or final, deliverables. ****Updated April 27, 2022Table of Contents1INTRODUCTION (3)1.1S COPE (3)1.1.1In Scope (3)1.1.2Out of Scope (3)1.2Q UALITY O BJECTIVE (3)1.2.1Primary Objective (3)1.2.2Secondary Objective (4)1.3R OLES AND R ESPONSIBILITIES (4)1.3.1Developer (4)1.3.2Adopter (4)1.3.3Testing Process Management Team (4)1.4A SSUMPTIONS FOR T EST E XECUTION (5)1.5C ONSTRAINTS FOR T EST E XECUTION (5)1.6D EFINITIONS (6)2TEST METHODOLOGY (6)2.1P URPOSE (6)2.1.1Overview (6)2.1.2Usability Testing (6)2.1.3Unit Testing (Multiple) (7)2.1.4Iteration/Regression Testing (7)2.1.5Final release Testing (7)2.1.6Testing completeness Criteria (8)2.2T EST L EVELS (8)2.2.1Build Tests (8)2.2.1.1Level 1 - Build Acceptance Tests (8)2.2.1.2Level 2 - Smoke Tests (8)2.2.1.3Level 2a - Bug Regression Testing (8)2.2.2Milestone Tests (8)2.2.2.1Level 3 - Critical Path Tests (8)2.2.3Release Tests (9)2.2.3.1Level 4 - Standard Tests (9)2.2.3.2Level 5 - Suggested Test (9)2.3B UG R EGRESSION (9)2.4B UG T RIAGE (9)2.5S USPENSION C RITERIA AND R ESUMPTION R EQUIREMENTS (10)2.6T EST C OMPLETENESS (10)2.6.1Standard Conditions: (10)2.6.2Bug Reporting & Triage Conditions: (10)3TEST DELIVERABLES (11)3.1D ELIVERABLES M ATRIX (11)3.2D OCUMENTS (12)3.2.1Test Approach Document (12)3.2.2Test Plan (12)3.2.3Test Schedule (12)3.2.4Test Specifications (13)3.2.5Requirements Traceability Matrix (13)3.3D EFECT T RACKING &D EBUGGING (13)3.3.1Testing Workflow (13)3.3.2Defect reporting using G FORGE (14)3.4R EPORTS (16)3.4.1Testing status reports (16)3.4.2Phase Completion Reports (16)3.4.3Test Final Report - Sign-Off (16)3.5R ESPONSIBILITY M ATRIX (16)4RESOURCE & ENVIRONMENT NEEDS (16)4.1T ESTING T OOLS (16)4.1.1Tracking Tools (16)4.1.1.1Configuration Management (17)4.2T EST E NVIRONMENT (17)4.2.1Hardware (17)4.2.2Software (17)4.3B UG S EVERITY AND P RIORITY D EFINITION (17)4.3.1Severity List (17)4.3.2Priority List (18)4.4B UG R EPORTING (18)5TERMS/ACRONYMS (18)1IntroductionThis test approach document describes the appropriate strategies, process, workflows and methodologies used to plan, organize, execute and manage testing of software projects within caBIG.1.1 ScopeDescribe the current test approach scope based on your role and project objectives.1.1.1In ScopeThe caBIG <workspace name> <system name>Test Plan defines the unit, integration, system, regression, and Client Acceptance testing approach. The test scope includes the following:•Testing of all functional, application performance, security and use casesrequirements listed in the Use Case document.•Quality requirements and fit metrics<system name>.•End-to-end testing and testing of interfaces of all systems that interact withthe <system name>.1.1.2Out of ScopeThe following are considered out of scope for caBIG <workspace name> <system name> system Test Plan and testing scope:•Functional requirements testing for systems outside <application name>•Testing of Business SOPs, disaster recovery and Business Continuity Plan.1.2Quality Objective1.2.1Primary ObjectiveA primary objective of testing application systems is to: assure that the system meets the full requirements, including quality requirements (AKA: Non-functional requirements) and fit metrics for each quality requirement and satisfies the use case scenarios and maintain the quality of the product. At the end of the project development cycle, the user should find that the project has met or exceeded all of their expectations as detailed in the requirements. Any changes, additions, or deletions to the requirements document, Functional Specification, or Design Specification will be documented and tested at the highest level of quality allowed within the remaining time of the project and within the ability of the test team.1.2.2Secondary ObjectiveThe secondary objective of testing application systems will be to: identify and expose all issues and associated risks, communicate all known issues to the project team, and ensure that all issues are addressed in an appropriate matter before release. As an objective, this requires careful and methodical testing of the application to first ensure all areas of the system are scrutinized and, consequently, all issues (bugs) found are dealt with appropriately.•1.3Roles and ResponsibilitiesRoles and responsibilities may differ based on the actual SOW. Below listed functions are for testing phase.1.3.1DeveloperAn NCI-designated Cancer Center selected and funded by NCICB to participate in a specific Workspace to undertake software or solution development activities. Responsible to:(a) Develop the system/application(b) Develop Use cases and requirements in collaboration with the Adopters(c) Conduct Unit, system, regression and integration testing(d) Support user acceptance testing1.3.2AdopterAn NCI-designated Cancer Center selected and funded by NCICB to undertake formal adoption, testing, validation, and application of products or solutions developed by Workspace Developers. Responsible to:(a) Contribute to Use case, requirement development through review(b) Contribute to develop and execution of the development test scripts throughreview(c) Conduct Full User Acceptance, regression, and end-to-end testing; thisincludes identifying testing scenarios, building the test scripts, executing scriptsand reporting test results1.3.3Testing Process Management TeamInclude NCI, BAH and Cancer Center Leads allocated to the <workspace name>. Group responsible to manage the entire testing process, workflow and quality management with activities and responsibilities to:(a) Monitor and manage testing integrity and Support testing activities(b) Coordinate activities across cancer centersAdd more as appropriate to testing scope1.4Assumptions for Test ExecutionBelow are some minimum assumptions (in black) that has be completed with some examples (in red). Any example may be used if deemed appropriate for the particular project. New assumptions may also be added that are reasoned to be suitable to the project.•For User Acceptance testing, the Developer team has completed unit,system and integration testing and met all the Requirement’s(including quality requirements) based on Requirement TraceabilityMatrix.•User Acceptance testing will be conducted by End-users•Test results will be reported on daily basis using Gforge. Failed scripts anddefect list from Gforge with evidence will be sent to Developer directly.•Use cases have been developed by Adopters for User Acceptance testing.Use cases are approved by test lead.•Test scripts are developed and approved.•Test Team will support and provide appropriate guidance to Adopters andDevelopers to conduct testing•Major dependencies should be reported immediately after the testing kickoffmeeting.1.5 Constraints for Test ExecutionBelow are some minimum assumptions (in black) followed by example constraints (red). Any example may be used if deemed appropriate for the particular project. New constraints may also be added that are reasoned to be suitable to the project.•Adopters should clearly understand on test procedures and recording adefect or enhancement. Testing Process Management Team willschedule a teleconference with Developers and Adopters to train andaddress any testing related issues.•Developer will receive consolidated list of request for test environment set up,user accounts set up, data set (actual and mock data), defect list, etc.through GForge after the initial Adopter testing kick off meeting.•Developer will support ongoing testing activities based on priorities••Test scripts must be approved by Test Lead prior test execution•Test scripts, test environment and dependencies should be addressed duringtesting kickoff meeting in presence of a SME and request list shouldbe submitted within 3 days of the kickoff meeting•The Developer cannot execute the User Acceptance and End to End testscripts. After debugging, the developer can conduct their internal test,but no results from that test can be recorded / reported.•Adopters are responsible to identify dependencies between test scripts andsubmit clear request to set up test environment1.6DefinitionsBugs: Any error or defect that cause the software/application or hardware to malfunction. Thatis also included in the requirements and does not meet the required workflow, process or function point.Enhancement:1) Any alteration or modification to the existing system for better workflow and process.2) An error or defect that causes the software/application or hardware to malfunction.Where 1) and 2) is NOT included in the requirements can be categorized as an enhancement. Enhancement can be added as a new requirement after appropriate Change Management process.2Test Methodology2.1Purpose2.1.1OverviewThe below list is not intended to limit the extent of the test plan and can be modified to become suitable for the particular project.The purpose of the Test Plan is to achieve the following:•Define testing strategies for each area and sub-area to include all the functional and quality (non-functional) requirements.•Divide Design Spec into testable areas and sub-areas (do not confuse with more detailed test spec). Be sure to also identify and include areas that are to be omitted (not tested) also. •Define bug-tracking procedures.•Identify testing risks.•Identify required resources and related information.•Provide testing Schedule.2.1.2Usability TestingThe purpose of usability testing is to ensure that the new components and features will function in a manner that is acceptable to the customer.Development will typically create a non-functioning prototype of the UI components to evaluate the proposed design. Usability testing can be coordinated by testing, but actual testing must beperformed by non-testers (as close to end-users as possible). Testing will review the findings and provide the project team with its evaluation of the impact these changes will have on the testing process and to the project as a whole.2.1.3Unit Testing (Multiple)Unit Testing is conducted by the Developer during code development process to ensure that proper functionality and code coverage have been achieved by each developer both during coding and in preparation for acceptance into iterations testing.The following are the example areas of the project must be unit-tested and signed-off before being passed on to regression Testing:•Databases, Stored Procedures, Triggers, Tables, and Indexes•NT Services•Database conversion•.OCX, .DLL, .EXE and other binary formatted executables2.1.4Iteration/Regression TestingDuring the repeated cycles of identifying bugs and taking receipt of new builds (containing bug fix code changes), there are several processes which are common to this phase across all projects. These include the various types of tests: functionality, performance, stress, configuration, etc. There is also the process of communicating results from testing and ensuring that new drops/iterations contain stable fixes (regression). The project should plan for a minimum of 2-3 cycles of testing (drops/iterations of new builds).At each iteration, a debriefing should be held. Specifically, the report must show that to the best degree achievable during the iteration testing phase, all identified severity 1 and severity 2 bugs have been communicated and addressed. At a minimum, all priority 1 and priority 2 bugs should be resolved prior to entering the beta phase.Below are examples. Any example may be used if deemed appropriate for the particular project. New content may also be added that are reasoned to be suitable to the project. Important deliverables required for acceptance into Final Release testing include: •Application SETUP.EXE•Installation instructions•All documentation (beta test scripts, manuals or training guides, etc.)2.1.5Final release TestingTesting team with end-users participates in this milestone process as well by providing confirmation feedback on new issues uncovered, and input based on identical or similar issues detected earlier. The intention is to verify that the product is ready for distribution, acceptable to the customer and iron out potential operational issues.Assuming critical bugs are resolved during previous iterations testing- Throughout the Final Release test cycle, bug fixes will be focused on minor and trivial bugs (severity 3 and 4). Testing will continue its process of verifying the stability of the application through regression testing (existing known bugs, as well as existing test cases).The milestone target of this phase is to establish that the application under test has reached a level of stability, appropriate for its usage (number users, etc.), that it can be released to the end users and caBIG community.2.1.6Testing completeness CriteriaRelease for production can occur only after the successful completion of the application under test throughout all of the phases and milestones previously discussed above.The milestone target is to place the release/app (build) into production after it has been shown that the app has reached a level of stability that meets or exceeds the client expectations as defined in the Requirements, Functional Spec., and caBIG Production Standards.2.2Test LevelsTesting of an application can be broken down into three primary categories and several sub-levels. The three primary categories include tests conducted every build (Build Tests), tests conducted every major milestone (Milestone Tests), and tests conducted at least once every project release cycle (Release Tests). The test categories and test levels are defined below: 2.2.1Build Tests2.2.1.1Level 1 - Build Acceptance TestsBuild Acceptance Tests should take less than 2-3 hours to complete (15 minutes is typical). These test cases simply ensure that the application can be built and installed successfully. Other related test cases ensure that adopters received the proper Development Release Document plus other build related information (drop point, etc.). The objective is to determine if further testing is possible. If any Level 1 test case fails, the build is returned to developers un-tested.2.2.1.2Level 2 - Smoke TestsSmoke Tests should be automated and take less than 2-3 hours (20 minutes is typical). These tests cases verify the major functionality a high level.The objective is to determine if further testing is possible. These test cases should emphasize breadth more than depth. All components should be touched, and every major feature should be tested briefly by the Smoke Test. If any Level 2 test case fails, the build is returned to developers un-tested.2.2.1.3Level 2a - Bug Regression TestingEvery bug that was “Open” during the previous build, but marked as “Fixed, Needs Re-Testing” for the current build under test, will need to be regressed, or re-tested. Once the smoke test is completed, all resolved bugs need to be regressed. It should take between 5 minutes to 1 hour to regress most bugs.2.2.2Milestone Tests2.2.2.1Level 3 - Critical Path TestsCritical Path test cases are targeted on features and functionality that the user will see and use every day.Critical Path test cases must pass by the end of every 2-3 Build Test Cycles. They do not need to be tested every drop, but must be tested at least once per milestone. Thus, the Critical Path test cases must all be executed at least once during the Iteration cycle, and once during theFinal Release cycle.2.2.3Release Tests2.2.3.1Level 4 - Standard TestsTest Cases that need to be run at least once during the entire test cycle for this release. These cases are run once, not repeated as are the test cases in previous levels. Functional Testingand Detailed Design Testing (Functional Spec and Design Spec Test Cases, respectively). These can be tested multiple times for each Milestone Test Cycle (Iteration, Final Release, etc.). Standard test cases usually include Installation, Data, GUI, and other test areas.2.2.3.2Level 5 - Suggested TestThese are Test Cases that would be nice to execute, but may be omitted due to time constraints.Most Performance and Stress Test Cases are classic examples of Suggested test cases (although some should be considered standard test cases). Other examples of suggested test cases include WAN, LAN, Network, and Load testing.2.3Bug RegressionBug Regression will be a central tenant throughout all testing phases.All bugs that are resolved as “Fixed, Needs Re-Testing” will be regressed when Testing team is notified of the new drop containing the fixes. When a bug passes regression it will be considered “Closed, Fixed”. If a bug fails regression, adopters testing team will notify development team by entering notes into GForge. When a Severity 1 bug fails regression, adopters Testing team should also put out an immediate email to development. The Test Lead will be responsible for tracking and reporting to development and product managementthe status of regression testing.2.4Bug TriageBug Triages will be held throughout all phases of the development cycle. Bug triages will bethe responsibility of the Test Lead. Triages will be held on a regular basis with the time frame being determined by the bug find rate and project schedules.Thus, it would be typical to hold few triages during the Planning phase, then maybe one triage per week during the Design phase, ramping up to twice per week during the latter stages ofthe Development phase. Then, the Stabilization phase should see a substantial reduction inthe number of new bugs found, thus a few triages per week would be the maximum (to dealwith status on existing bugs).The Test Lead, Product Manager, and Development Lead should all be involved in these triage meetings. The Test Lead will provide required documentation and reports on bugs for all attendees. The purpose of the triage is to determine the type of resolution for each bug and to prioritize and determine a schedule for all “To Be Fixed Bugs’. Development w ill then assignthe bugs to the appropriate person for fixing and report the resolution of each bug back into the GForge bug tracker system. The Test Lead will be responsible for tracking and reporting onthe status of all bug resolutions.2.5Suspension Criteria and Resumption RequirementsThis section should be defined to list criteria’s and resumption requirements should certain degree and pre-defined levels of test objectives and goals are not met.Please see example below:- Testing will be suspended on the affected software module when Smoke Test (Level 1) or Critical Path (Level 2) test case bugs are discovered after the 3rd iteration.- Testing will be suspended if there is critical scope change that impacts the Critical PathA bug report should be filed by Development team. After fixing the bug, Development team will follow the drop criteria (described above) to provide its latest drop for additional Testing. At that time, adopters will regress the bug, and if passes, continue testing the module.2.6Test CompletenessTesting will be considered complete when the following conditions have been met:2.6.1Standard Conditions:•When Adopters and Developers, agree that testing is complete, the app is stable, and agree that the application meets functional requirements.•Script execution of all test cases in all areas have passed.•Automated test cases have in all areas have passed.•All priority 1 and 2 bugs have been resolved and closed.•NCI approves the test completion•Each test area has been signed off as completed by the Test Lead.•50% of all resolved severity 1 and 2 bugs have been successfully re-regressed as final validation.•Ad hoc testing in all areas has been completed.2.6.2Bug Reporting & Triage Conditions:Please add Bug reporting and triage conditions that will be submitted and evaluated to measure the current status.•Bug find rate indicates a decreasing trend prior to Zero Bug Rate (no new Sev. 1/2/3 bugs found).•Bug find rate remains at 0 new bugs found (Severity 1/2/3) despite a constant test effort across 3 or more days.•Bug severity distribution has changed to a steady decrease in Sev. 1 and 2 bugs discovered. •No ‘Must Fix’ bugs remaining prior despite sustained testing.3Test DeliverablesTesting will provide specific deliverables during the project. These deliverables fall into three basic categories: Documents, Test Cases / Bug Write-ups, and Reports. Here is a diagram indicating the dependencies of the various deliverables:As the diagram above shows, there is a progression from one deliverable to the next. Each deliverable has its own dependencies, without which it is not possible to fully complete the deliverable.The following page contains a matrix depicting all of the deliverables that Testing will use. 3.1Deliverables MatrixBelow is the list of artifacts that are process driven and should be produced during the testing lifecycle. Certain deliverables should be delivered as part of test validation, you may add to the below list of deliverables that support the overall objectives and to maintain the quality.This matrix should be updated routinely throughout the project development cycle in you project specific Test Plan.3.2Documents3.2.1Test Approach DocumentThe Test Approach document is derived from the Project Plan, Requirements and Functional Specification documents. This document defines the overall test approach to be taken for the project. The Standard Test Approach document that you are currently reading is a boilerplate from which the more specific project Test Approach document can be extracted.When this document is completed, the Test Lead will distribute it to the Product Manager, Development Lead, User Representative, Program Manager, and others as needed for review and sign-off.3.2.2Test PlanThe Test Plan is derived from the Test Approach, Requirements, Functional Specs, and detailed Design Specs. The Test Plan identifies the details of the test approach, identifying the associated test case areas within the specific product for this release cycle.The purpose of the Test Plan document is to:•Specify the approach that Testing will use to test the product, and the deliverables (extract from the Test Approach).•Break the product down into distinct areas and identify features of the product that are to be tested.•Specify the procedures to be used for testing sign-off and product release.•Indicate the tools used to test the product.•List the resource and scheduling plans.•Indicate the contact persons responsible for various areas of the project.•Identify risks and contingency plans that may impact the testing of the product.•Specify bug management procedures for the project.•Specify criteria for acceptance of development drops to testing (of builds).3.2.3Test ScheduleThis section is not vital to the document as a whole and can be modified or deleted if needed by the author.The Test Schedule is the responsibility of the Test Lead (or Department Scheduler, if one exists) and will be based on information from the Project Scheduler (done by Product Manager). The project specific Test Schedule may be done in MS Project.3.2.4Test SpecificationsA Test Specification document is derived from the Test Plan as well as the Requirements, Functional Spec., and Design Spec documents. It provides specifications for the constructionof Test Cases and includes list(s) of test case areas and test objectives for each of the components to be tested as identified in the project’s Test Plan.3.2.5Requirements Traceability MatrixA Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) which is used to link the test scenarios to the requirements and use cases is a required part of the Test Plan documentation for all projects. Requirements traceability is defined as the ability to describe and follow the life of a requirement, in both a forward and backward direction (i.e. from its origins, through its development and specification, to its subsequent deployment and use, and through periods of ongoing refinement and iteration in any of these phases). 1Attached is a sample basic RTM which could provide a starting point for this documentation. The important thing is to choose a template or document basis that achieves thorough traceability throughout the life of the project.C:\Documents andSettings\523217\My Doc3.3Defect Tracking & Debugging3.3.1Testing WorkflowThe below workflow illustrates the testing workflow process for Developers and Adopters for User Acceptance and End to End testing.Pl. note the yellow highlighted process where the Adopter is required to directly send defect list with evidence to the Developer. Similarly, Developer is required to confirm directly with the Adopter after bug fixes along with updating on the Bugzilla.1 .au/info_requirements_traceability.php3.3.2Defect reporting using G FORGEALL defects should be logged using ‘G FORGE’, to address and debug defects. Adopters are also requested to send a daily defect report to the developer. Developers will update the defect list on G Forge and notify the requestor after the defect has been resolved.Developers and Adopters are required to request an account on G Forge for the relative workspace. Debugging should be based on Priority – High > Medium > Low, these priorities are set by the Adopters and are based on how critical is the test script in terms of dependency and mainly based on use case scenario.Below screen shot displays ‘Add new Defect’ screen, fields marked with ( * ) are mandatory fields and Adopters should also upload the evidence file for all the defects listed.All High priority defects should be addressed within 1 day of the request and resolved/closed within 2 days of the initial requestAll Medium priority defects should be addressed within 2 days of the request andresolved/closed within 4 days of the initial requestAll Low priority defects should be resolved/closed no later than 5 days of the initial request.G Forge URL - User may either search for workspace or select from list of recent project from the bottom right side of the window. E.g. searching for ‘caties’.At the workspace, the user can request Administrators to setup their user account for that workspace.After login, user can select ‘Tracker’ tab to ‘Submit New’ defect. Us er can add defect info. As shown in below screen.。

软件测试计划书模板(通用版)are Testing Plann Historyn Date1.0 XXXX/XX/XXAMD n NotesA-Add。

M-Modify。

D-Delete)Table of Contents1.n。

31.1 Purpose。

31.2 Background。

31.3 Scope。

32.Testing Reference Documents and n Documents。

4 2.1 Testing Reference Documents。

4nThe purpose of this are testing plan is to outline the testing approach and res for the ing are release。

The background of the project and the scope of the testing are also explained in this document.Testing Reference Documents and n DocumentsThe testing reference documents include the are requirementsn and the design documents。

These documents provide the necessary n for the testing team to develop test cases and test s。

The n documents include the test plan。

test cases。

and test results。

These documents are used to communicate the testing progress and the test es to the project stakeholders.In order to ensure the quality of the are release。