It centers around the issue of death penalty,shows different kinds of excusion in different times
and countries and discuss whether death penalty should be abolished or not.
Should The Death Penalty Be
ABOLISHED or RETAINED?
By
Yan Chunshuang
Deng Mingda
Dong Qiushi
LvChade
Yu Yang
Class0907301
School Science
Harbin Institude of Technology
May 23rd,2010
Abstract
The People's Republic of China is the world's executions than any other
country, during which inevitably will bring a lot of injustice, and all of us
want to see the second "Dou E", so we wrote this paper is intended to
cause national attention to the State in punishing serious criminals could
take better and more effective measures, not just a simple implementation
of the death penalty, so as to reduce damage caused by the death penalty
to the families and also to the prisoners a chance of rehabilitation,
英语辩论赛：是否应该执行死刑（反方四辩总结）
第一篇：英语辩论赛：是否应该执行死刑(反方四辩总结)
Good afternoon,Mr judge,honorable opposition and my
humble partners.This house believes that death penalty should
not be applied.Death penalty advocates have used the economic
standpoint to make their case.Just as the opposition said.More
convicts means more prisons which means more money.By killing
murderers, we can save money!By this rational, we should
execute all convicts and have no prisons!Think of the money we
would save!Abviously, we can not put a price on a human life.The
most common point held by death penalty supporters is that it
has the effect of deterrence.But there is no convincing research
that can show how death penalty functions better than life
imprisonment.According to Stephen Nathanson, the author of
“An Eye for an Eye”, the fear of death does not usually stop
Should the death penalty be abolished? Why or why not?
死刑应该废除吗?为什么或者为什么不呢?
The death penalty, or capital punishment, is a highly
controversial topic, with strong arguments both for and
against its use. Opponents of capital punishment argue that
it is inhumane, irreversible, and an ineffective deterrent to
crime. Advocates of capital punishment argue that it serves
as a deterrent to violent crimes and provides justice for
victims and their families.
Those who oppose the death penalty argue that it is
inhumane and violates human rights. Capital punishment
involves ending a human life, which is a violation of the right
to life. Some instances in the past have demonstrated that
some wrongfully accused individuals have been executed
in the absence of exceptional investigation. Additionally, the
death penalty process can also lead to cruel and degrading
死刑废存英语演讲稿
死刑废存英语演讲稿
Capital punishment is a traditional punishment. In history,
many rulers took the capital punishment as an important tool to
deal with those who most seriously opposed their domination. In
those days, capital punishment was right and proper. However,
its function and existence start becoming questionable after
having been applied for thousand years. This essay will argue that
capital punishment should not be abolished.
First and foremost, capital punishment indicates the
government’s attitude towards crimes. When a criminal’s guilt
attains to a certain extend, it will be unacceptable for the whole
society on both moral and legal grounds. Then the government
should and must sentence the criminal to death. Only in this way
can the government proves that they are capable and responsible.
