unit5ineverwriteright课文翻译大学英语一
- 格式:doc
- 大小:61.50 KB
- 文档页数:4
Unit 1 hit the nail on the head 恰到好处Have you ever watched a clumsy man hammering a nail into a box? He hits it first to one side, then to another, perhaps knocking it over completely, so that in the end he only gets half of it into the wood. A skillful carpenter, on the other hand, will drive the nail with a few firm, deft blows, hitting it each time squarely on the head. So with language; the good craftsman will choose words that drive home his point firmly and exactly. A word that is more or less right, a loose phrase, an ambiguous expression, a vague adjective(模糊的形容词), will not satisfy a writer who aims at clean English. He will try always to get the word that is completely right for his purpose.你见过一个笨手笨脚的男人往箱子上钉钉子吗?只见他左敲敲,右敲敲,说不准还会将整个钉子锤翻,结果敲来敲去到头来只敲进了半截。
而娴熟的木匠就不这么干。
他每敲一下都会坚实巧妙地正对着钉头落下去,一钉到底。
语言也是如此。
新编英语教程5课文翻译(unit1-15) Unit 1 恰到好处你见过一个笨手笨脚的男人往箱子上钉钉子吗?只见他左敲敲,右敲敲,说不准还会将整个钉子锤翻,结果敲来敲去到头来只敲进了半截。
而娴熟的木匠就不这么干。
他每敲一下都会坚实巧妙地正对着钉头落下去,一钉到底。
语言也是如此。
一位优秀的艺术家谴词造句上力求准确而有力地表达自己的观点。
差不多的词,不准确的短语,摸棱两可的表达,含糊不清的修饰,都无法使一位追求纯真英语的作家满意。
他会一直思考,直至找到那个能准确表达他的意思的词。
The French have an apt(贴切的) phrase for this. They speak of “le mot juste,”法国人有一个很贴切的短语来表达这样一个意思,即“le mot juste”, 恰到好处的词。
有很多关于精益求精的作家的名人轶事,比如福楼拜常花几天的时间力求使一两个句子在表达上准确无误。
在浩瀚的词海中,词与词之间有着微妙的区别,要找到能恰如其分表达我们意思的词绝非易事。
这不仅仅是扎实的语言功底和相当大的词汇量的问题,还需要人们绞尽脑汁,要观察敏锐。
选词是认识过程的一个步骤,也是详细描述我们的思想感情并表达出来使自己以及听众和读者深刻理解的一个环节。
有人说:“在我思想未成文之前,我怎么知道自己的想法?”这听起来似乎很离谱,但它确实很有道理。
It is hard work choosing the right words, but we shall be rewarded by thesatisfaction that finding them brings. The e某act use of language gives us mastery(掌握) over the material we aredealing with. Perhaps you have been asked “What sort of a manis so-and-so(等)?” You begin: “Oh, I think he’s quite anice chap (家伙)but he’s rather…” and then you hesitate trying to find a word or phrase to e某press what it is abouthim that you do n’t like, that constitutes(构成) hislimitation. When you find the right phrase you feel that your conception of the man is clearer and sharper.寻找恰如其分的词的确是件不容易的事。
大学英语综合教程5课文翻译One Writer's Beginnings1 I learned from the age of two or three that any room in our house, at any time of day,was there to read in, or to be read to. My mother read to me. She'd read to me in the big bedroom in the mornings, when we were in her rocker together, which ticked in rhythmas we rocked, as though we had a cricket accompanying the story. She'd read to me inthe dining room on winter afternoons in front of the coal fire, with our cuckoo clockending the story with "Cuckoo", and at night when I'd got in my own bed. I must havegiven her no peace. Sometimes she read to me in the kitchen while she sat churning,and the churning sobbed along with any story. It was my ambition to have her read tome while I churned; once she granted my wish, but she read off my story before Ibrought her butter. She was an expressive reader. When she was reading "Puss in Boots," for instance, it was impossible not to know that she distrusted all cats.作家起步时我从两三岁起就知道,家中随便在哪个房间里,白天无论在什么时间,都可以念书或听人念书。
Book 1 Unit 5Listen to the recording two or three times and then think over the following questions:1. Do you have a favorite love song? What is its name? Who is the singer? Can you sing or hum the tune?2. What is the song you have just heard mainly about?3. Do you think it appropriate to begin this unit with a love song? Why or why not?The following word in the recording may be new to you:rhyme n.韵; 韵味Everywhere the whole world over people have always felt that music and romance go together. As Shakespeare said, music is the food of love. And so, as we have two love stories for you to read, what better way to start than with a love song? Here, then, is Martina McBride singing to her Valentine.ValentineMartina McBrideIf there were no wordsNo way to speakI would still hear youIf there were no tearsNo way to feel insideI'd still feel for youAnd even if the sun refused to shineEven if romance ran out of rhymeYou would still have my heart until the end of timeYou're all I need, my love, my ValentineAll of my lifeI have been waiting for youAll you give to meYou've opened my eyesAnd shown me how to love unselfishlyI've dreamed of this a thousand times beforeBut in my dreams I couldn't love you moreI will give you my heartUntil the end of timeYou're all I need, my love, my ValentineAnd even if the sun refused to shineEven if romance ran out of rhymeYou would still have my heart until the end of time'Cause all I need is you, my ValentineYou're all I need, my love, my ValentineText AA letter or telephone call comes from someone you have not met, andyou find yourself imagining what the person looks like, putting a face tothe hidden voice. Are you any good at this? Sometimes it is easy to get itwrong.一个你从没有见过的人给你寄来一封信或打来一个电话,而你不知不觉地想象着这个人是个什么样儿,赋予这个隐秘的声音一张面孔。
Unit 1 Love of readingText A One Writer's Beginnings1 I learned from the age of two or three that any room in our house, at any time of day, was there to read in, or to be read to. My mother read to me. She'd read to me in the big bedroom in the mornings, when we were in her rocker together, which ticked in rhythm as we rocked, as though we had a cricket accompanying the story. She'd read to me in the dining room on winter afternoons in front of the coal fire, with our cuckoo clock ending the story with "Cuckoo", and at night when I'd got in my own bed. I must have given her no peace. Sometimes she read to me in the kitchen while she sat churning, and the churning sobbed along with any story. It was my ambition to have her read to me while I churned; once she granted my wish, but she read off my story before I brought her butter. She was an expressive reader. When she was reading "Puss in Boots," for instance, it was impossible not to know that she distrusted all cats.2 It had been startling and disappointing to me to find out that story books had been written by people, that books were not natural wonders, coming up of themselves like grass. Yet regardless of where they came from, I cannot remember a time when I was not in love with them —with the books themselves, cover and binding and the paper they were printed on, with their smell and their weight and with their possession in my arms, captured and carried off to myself. Still illiterate, I was ready for them, committed to all the reading I could give them.3 Neither of my parents had come from homes that could afford to buy many books, but though it must have been something of a strain on his salary, as the youngest officer in a young insurance company, my father was all the while carefully selecting and ordering away for what he and Mother thought we children should grow up with. They bought first for the future .4 Besides the bookcase in the living room, which was always called "the library", there were the encyclopedia tables and dictionary stand under windows in our dining room. Here to help us grow up arguing around the dining room table were the Unabridged Webster, the Columbia Encyclopedia, Compton's Pictured Encyclopedia, the Lincoln Library of Information, and later the Book of Knowledge. In "the library", inside the bookcase were books I could soon begin on —and I did, reading them all alike and as they came, straight down their rows, top shelf to bottom. My mother read secondarily for information; she sank as a hedonist into novels. She read Dickens in the spirit in which she would have eloped with him. The novels of her girlhood that had stayed on in her imagination, besides those of Dickens and Scott and Robert Louis Stevenson, wereJane Eyre, Trilby, The Woman in White, Green Mansions, King Solomon's Mines.5 To both my parents I owe my early acquaintance with a beloved Mark Twain. There was a full set of Mark Twain and a short set of Ring Lardner in our bookcase, and those were the volumes that in time united us all, parents and children.6 Reading everything that stood before me was how I came upon a worn old book that had belonged to my father as a child. It was called Sanford and Merton. Is there anyone left who recognizes it, I wonder? It is the famous moral tale written by Thomas Day in the 1780s, but of him no mention is made on the title page of this book; here it is Sanford and Merton in Words of One Syllable by Mary Godolphin. Here are the rich boy and the poor boy and Mr. Barlow, their teacher and interlocutor, in long discourses alternating with dramatic scenes —anger and rescue allotted to the rich and the poor respectively. It ends with not one but two morals, both engraved on rings: "Do what you ought, come what may," and "If we would be great, we must first learn to be good."7 This book was lacking its front cover, the back held on by strips of pasted paper, now turned golden, in several layers, and the pages stained, flecked, and tattered around the edges; its garish illustrations had come unattached but were preserved, laid in. I had the feeling even in my heedless childhood that this was the only book my father as a little boy had had of his own. He had held onto it, and might have gone to sleep on its coverless face: he had lost his mother when he was seven. My father had never made any mention to his own children of the book, but he had brought it along with him from Ohio to our house and shelved it in our bookcase.8 My mother had brought from West Virginia that set of Dickens: those books looked sad, too — they had been through fire and water before I was born, she told me, and there they were, lined up — as I later realized, waiting for me.9 I was presented, from as early as I can remember, with books of my own, which appeared on my birthday and Christmas morning. Indeed, my parents could not give me books enough. They must have sacrificed to give me on my sixth or seventh birthday — it was after I became a reader for myself-the ten-volume set of Our Wonder World. These were beautifully made, heavy books I would lie down with on the floor in front of the dining room hearth, and more often than the rest volume 5, Every Child's Story Book, was under my eyes. There were the fairy tales —Grimm, Andersen, the English, the French, "Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves"; and there was Aesop and Reynard the Fox; there were the myths and legends, Robin Hood, King Arthur, and St. George and the Dragon, even the history of Joan of Arc; a whack of Pilgrim's Progress and a long piece of Gulliver. They all carried their classic illustrations. I located myself in these pages andcould go straight to the stories and pictures I loved; very often "The Yellow Dwarf" was first choice, with Walter Crane's Yellow Dwarf in full color making his terrifying appearance flanked by turkeys. Now that volume is as worn and backless and hanging apart as my father's poor Sanford and Merton. One measure of my love for Our Wonder World was that for a long time I wondered if I would go through fire and water for it as my mother had done for Charles Dickens; and the only comfort was to think I could ask my mother to do it for me.10 I believe I'm the only child I know of who grew up with this treasure in the house.I used to ask others, "Did you have Our Wonder World?" I'd have to tell them The Book of Knowledge could not hold a candle to it.11 I live in gratitude to my parents for initiating me —as early as I begged for it, without keeping me waiting — into knowledge of the word, into reading and spelling, by way of the alphabet. They taught it to me at home in time for me to begin to read before starting to school.12 Ever since I was first read to, then started reading to myself, there has never beena line read that I didn't hear. As my eyes followed the sentence, a voice was saying it silently to me. It isn't my mother's voice, or the voice of any person I can identify, certainly not my own. It is human, but inward, and it is inwardly that I listen to it. It is to me the voice of the story or the poem itself. The cadence, whatever it is that asks you to believe, the feeling that resides in the printed word, reaches me through the reader-voice: I have supposed, but never found out, that this is the case with all readers — to read as listeners — and with all writers, to write as listeners. It may be part of the desire to write. The sound of what falls on the page begins the process of testing it for truth , for me. Whether I am right to trust so far I don't know. By now I don't know whether I could do either one, reading or writing, without the other.13 My own words, when I am at work on a story, I hear too as they go, in the same voice that I hear when I read in books. When I write and the sound of it comes back to my ears, then I act to make my changes. I have always trusted this voice.作家起步时我从两三岁起就知道,家中随便在哪个房间里,白天无论在什么时间,都可以念书或听人念书。
大学英语第三册UNIT5全文翻译对照(精选五篇)第一篇:大学英语第三册UNIT5全文翻译对照Writing Three Thank-You Letters Alex HaleyIt was 1943, during World War II, and I was a young U. S. coastguardsman. My ship, the USS Murzim, had been under way for several days. Most of her holds contained thousands of cartons of canned or dried foods. The other holds were loaded with five-hundred-pound bombs packed delicately in padded racks. Our destination was a big base on the island of Tulagi in the South Pacific. 写三封感谢信亚利克斯·黑利那是在二战期间的1943年,我是个年轻的美国海岸警卫队队员。
我们的船,美国军舰军市一号已出海多日。
多数船舱装着成千上万箱罐装或风干的食品。
其余的船舱装着不少五百磅重的炸弹,都小心翼翼地放在垫过的架子上。
我们的目的地是南太平洋图拉吉岛上一个规模很大的基地。
I was one of the Murzim's several cooks and, quite the same as for folk ashore, this Thanksgiving morning had seen us busily preparing a traditional dinner featuring roast turkey.我是军市一号上的一个厨师,跟岸上的人一样,那个感恩节的上午,我们忙着在准备一道以烤火鸡为主的传统菜肴。
Unit 5 THE MONSTERHe was an undersized little man, with a head too big for his body -- a sickly little man.His nerves were had. He had skin trouble. It was agony for him to wear anything next tohis skin coarser than silk. And he had seclusions of grandeur.He was a monster of conceit.Never for one minute did he look at the world or at people, except in relation to himself. He was not only the most important person in theworld,to himself;in his own eyes he was the only person who existed. He believed himself to be one of the greatest dramatists in the world, one of the greatest thinkers, andone of the greatest composers. To hear him talk, he was Shakespeare, and Beethoven, and Plato, rolled into one. And you would have had no difficulty in hearing him talk. He wasone of the most exhausting conversationalists that ever lived. An evening with him was anevening spent in listening to a monologue. Sometimes he was brilliant; sometimes he was maddeningly tiresome. But whether he was being brilliant or dull, he had one sole topicof conversation: himself. What he thought and what he did.He had a mania for being in the right.The slightest hint of disagreement,from anyone, on the most trivial point, was enough to set him off on a harangue that might lastfor house, in which he proved himself right in so many ways, and with such exhaustingvolubility, that in the end his hearer, stunned and deafened, would agree with him, for thesake of peace.It never occurred to him that he and his doing were not of the most intense and fascinating interest to anyone with whom he came in contact.He had theories about almost any subject under the sun, including vegetarianism, the drama, politics, and music;and in support of these theories he wrote pamphlets,le tters, books⋯ thousands upon thousands of words, hundreds and hundreds of pages. He not only wrote these things, and published them -- usually at somebody else's expense-- but he would sit and read them aloud, for hours, to his friends and his family.He wrote operas,and no sooner did he have the synopsis of a story, but he would invite -- or rather summon -- a crowed of his friends to his house, and read it aloud tothem. Not for criticism. For applause. When the complete poem was written, the friendshad to come again,and hear that read aloud.Then he would publish the poem, sometimes years before the music that went with it was written. He played the piano like a composer, in the worst sense of what that implies, and he would sit down at the pianobefore parties that included some of the finest pianists of his time, and play for them, bythe hour, his own music, needless to say. He had a composer's voice. And he wouldinvite eminent vocalists to his house and sing them his operas, taking all the parts.He had the emotional stability of a six-year-old child. When he felt out of sorts, hewould rave and stamp, or sink into suicidal gloom and talk darkly of going to the East toend his days as a Buddhist wonk.Ten minutes later,when something pleased him,he would rush out of doors and run around the garden, or jump up and down on the sofa, orstand on his head. He could be grief-stricken over the death of a pet dog, and he could becallous and heartless to a degree that would have made a Roman emperor shudder.He was almost innocent of any sense of responsibility.Not only did he seem incapable of supporting himself,but it never occurred to him that he was under ay obligation to do so. He was convinced that the world owed him a living. In support of thisbelief,he borrowed money from everybody who was good for a loan--men,women, friends, or strangers. He wrote begging letters by the score, sometimes groveling withoutshame, at other loftily offering his intended benefactor the privilege of contributing to hissupport, and being mortally offended if the recipient declined the honor. I have found norecord of his ever paying or repaying money to anyone who did not have a legal claim upon it.What money he could lay his hands on he spent like an Indian rajah.The mere prospect of a performance of one of his operas was enough to set him to running up bills amounting to ten times the amount of his prospective royalties. No one will ever know --certainly he never knew -- how much money he owed.We do know that his greatest benefactor gave him $6,000 to pay the most pressing of his debts in one city, and a yearlater had to give him $16,000 to enable him to live in another city without being throwninto jail for debt.He was equally unscrupulous in other ways. An endless procession of women marched through his life. His first wife spent twenty years enduring and forgiving his infidelities. His second wife had been the wife of his most devoted friend and admirer, from whom he stole her. And even while he was trying to persuade her to leave her firsthusband he was writing to a friend to inquire whether he could suggest some wealthy woman -- any wealthy woman -- whom he could marry for her money.He was completely selfish in his other personal relationships.His liking for his friends was measured solely by the completeness of their devotion to him,or by their usefulness to him, whether financial or artistic. The minute they failed him -- even by somuch as refusing dinner invitation -- or began to lessen in usefulness, he cast them offwithout a second thought. At the end of his life he had exactly one friend left whom hehad known even in middle age.The name of this monster was Richard Wagner.Everything that I have said abouthim you can find on record -- in newspapers, in police reports, in the testimony of peoplewho knew him, in his own letters, between the lines of his autobiography. And the curiousthing about this record is that it doesn't matter in the least.Because this undersized, sickly, disagreeable, fascinating little man was right all thetime. The joke was on us. He was one of the world's greatest dramatists; he was a greatthinker; he was one of the most stupendous musical geniuses that, up to now, the worldhas ever seen. The world did owe him a living.When you consider what he wrote--thirteen operas and music dramas,eleven of them still holding the stage,eight of them unquestionably worth ranking among the world's great musico-dramatic masterpieces--when you listen to what he wrote,the debts and heartaches that people had to endure from him don't seem much of a price. Think of the luxury with which for a time, at least, fate rewarded Napoleon, the man whoruined France and looted Europe; and then perhaps you will agree that a few thousanddollars' worth of debts were not too heavy a price to pay for the Ring trilogy.What if he was faithless to his friends and to his wives? He had one mistress to whomhe was faithful to the day of his death:Music.Not for a single moment did he ever compromise with what he believed, with what be dreamed.There is not a line of his music that could have been conceived by a little mind. Even when he is dull, or downrightbad,he is dull in the grand manner.There is greatness about his worst mistakes. Listening to his music, one does not forgive him for what he may or may not have been. Itis not a matter of forgiveness.It is a matter of being dumb with wonder that his poor brain and body didn't burst under the torment of the demon of creative energy that livedinside him,struggling,clawing, scratching to be released;tearing,shrieking at him to write the music that was in him.The miracle is that what he did in the little space of seventy years could have been done at all, even by a great genius. Is it any wonder that hehad no time to be a man?怪才他身材矮小,同他的身体相比,头却很大——他是一个常生病的小个子。
译林版八年级下册英语课文及翻译UNIT 5英中对照版Comic stripYou're old enough to learn about manners now, Hobo.霍波,你现在大了,应该要学习礼仪了。
Eh? What do you mean?嗯?你是什么意思?First, always share your things with others.首先,要常常同别人分享你的东西。
Second, ...第二,……Hey! That's my cake!嘿!那是我的蛋糕!Second, don't cut in on others. Always wait politely.第二,不要打断别人的话。
要礼貌的等着。
You should learn about manners too. You're never too old to learn. 你也应该学学礼仪。
活到老,学到老。
Welcome to the unitCan we chat in the library?我们在图书馆能聊天吗?I'm afraid not. We should keep quiet.不能。
我们应该保持安静。
Anything else?还有别的吗?Don't drop litter everywhere. Always keep the library clean.不能随地扔垃圾。
时刻让图书馆保持干净。
I see. Can we eat in the library?我知道了。
我们在图书馆能吃东西吗?No, we can't eat there.不行,我们不能在那儿吃东西。
Can we write in the books?我们可以在书上写字吗?No, we shouldn't write in the books, and we should put them back after reading. 不行,我们不能在书上写字,我们看完书之后,应该把书放回原处。
Alex Haley served in the Coast Guard during World War ll. On an especially lonely day to be at sea -- Thanksgiving Day -- he began to give serious thought to a holiday that has become, for many Americans, a day of overeating and watching endless games of football. Haley decided to celebrate the true meaning of Thanksgiving by writing three very special letters.亚历克斯·黑利二战时在海岸警卫队服役。
出海在外,时逢一个倍感孤寂的日子――感恩节,他开始认真思考起这一节日的意义。
对许多美国人而言,这个节日已成为大吃大喝、没完没了地看橄榄球比赛的日子。
黑利决定写三封不同寻常的信,以此来纪念感恩节的真正意义。
Writing Three Thank-You LettersAlex Haley1 It was 1943, during World War II, and I was a young U. S. coastguardsman. My ship, the USS Murzim, had been under way for several days. Most of her holds contained thousands of cartons of canned or dried foods. The other holds were loaded with five-hundred-pound bombs packed delicately in padded racks. Our destination was a big base on the island of Tulagi in the South Pacific.写三封感谢信亚利克斯·黑利那是在二战期间的1943年,我是个年轻的美国海岸警卫队队员。
Unit 5 I Never Write Right◆Before Reading1. Warm-up Questions1. Have you got any dreams? If so, what are they?2. What do you think are needed to fulfill one’s dreams?3. A Hindu proverb says, “Luck is one half of success.”How do youunderstand this proverb?2. An English SongI Have a DreamBlank-fillingI have a dream, a song to singTo help me with anythingIf you see the of a fairy taleYou can take the future even if youI in angelsSomething good in everything I seeI believe in angelsWhen I know the time is right for meI'll cross the stream I have a I have a dream, a fantasy To help me throughAnd my destination makes it the whilethrough the darkness still another mileI believe in angelsSomething good in everything I seeI believe in angelsWhen I know the time is meI'll cross the stream I have a dreamI have a dream, a song to singTo help me cope with anythingIf you see the wonder of aYou can take the future even if you failI believe in angelsSomething good in everything I seeI believe in angelsWhen I know the time is right for meI'll cross the I have a dreamI'll cross the stream I have a dream3. Background Information▲Linda StaffordName: Linda StaffordYear of birth: 1943Occupation: a native American writerEducation: University of Alaska, 1969University of New Mexico, 1967University of Texas, 1966University of Colorado, 1961Theme of her Works: hope, optimism, never giving up▲Chicken Soup for the SoulChicken Soup for the Soul is a series of books, usually featuring a collection of short stories. Short motivational essays are alsofeatured. The 101 stories in the first book of the series were compiled by motivational speakers Jack Canfield and Mark Victor Hansen.Volumes issued: Chicken Soup for the Pre-Teen SoulChicken Soup for the Prisoner's SoulChicken Soup for the Volunteer's SoulChicken Soup for the Soul at Work1998 New York Times Business Bestseller!Over 1 Million copies sold worldwide!It is a collection of true stories from people in businesses, organizations, factories, schools and hospitals, who are not afraid to bring their soul to work. At times funny, touching, wise and inspiring, these tales show the daily courage, compassion and creativity that take place in workplaces everywhere. Chicken Soup for the Soul at Work is a rich resource for those of us who want a life-affirming workplace.ReviewLeading-inIntroduction▲Native American1. Were there any people in North Americawhen the history of colonies started?Yes, about 500 nations.2. How many languages were they speaking?About 300 languages.3. How many Indian people are now in NorthAmerica and the United States respectively?10 million, 2 million.Discussion: Understand the relationship of the following words and phrases.The first people to live in North America were the American Indians, or Native Americans. Modern scientists believe that the first Native Americans came from Asia 15,000 or 30,000 years ago across the Bering Strait from Siberia to Alaska. They did not live in one place, but instead were always on the move as they looked for food. In other words, the first American Indians were hunters who followed the animals —their food source —during time of migration from place to place. Together, the nomadic people and animals slowly migrated toward the south. These early inhabitants gradually spread out all over the North American continent (now Canada, the United States, and Mexico.)▲Grading System in the USThe A-F systemIn many countries including the United States, grades are given on an A-F system where A is best and F is worst. The letter E is typically omitted, since an F can be turned into an E by drawing a small line at the bottom of the letter, and because E traditionally stood for Excellent but would be very poor on an A-F system. An F grade is failing and results in denial of course credit, while a D is poor, but passing. Most U.S. colleges require grades of C or better in one's major, as well as a 2.0 (C) grade point average.A = excellentB = goodC = averageD = poor F = failure▲Webster DictionaryIn 1806, Noah Webster published his first dictionary. His great dictionary, An American Dictionary of the English Language, appeared in two volumes in 1828. This work included 12,000 words and 40,000 definitions that had never before appeared in a dictionary.Born in West Hartford, Connecticut in 1758, Noah Webster came of age during the American Revolution and was a strong advocate of the Constitutional Convention. He believed fervently(热忱地)in the developing cultural independence of the United States, a chief part of which was to be a distinctive American language with its own idiom, pronunciation, and style.◆Global Reading1. Part Division of the TextPart1(1—13): The author’s dream to be a writer.Part2(14—52): Difficulties and success she experienced in realizing her dream.Part3(53—70): The secret of her successful writing career.2. True or FalseDirections: Decide whether the following statements about the text are true or false.1.When Linda told her English class that she was going to writeand illustrate her own books, all of them believed she could.(F)(Half of the students nearly fell out of their chairs laughing.)2. Linda has had lots of her work published before she graduatedfrom high school.(T)3. Household chores had to be done when she was on her first book.(T)4. The name of her second book is Crying Wind.(F)The name of her first book is Crying Wind, the second book My Searching Heart.(F)The name of her first book is Crying Wind, the second book My Searching Heart.5. Seven books have been written by Linda so far.(F)She has written eight books. Four have been published, and three are still out with the publishers. One stinks.Review3. Further UnderstandingFor Part 1 Role PlayMake a dialogue between Linda and her English teacher when she was asked to say something about her dreams in class.For Part 2 Questions and Answers1.Why didn’t she mention her writing to her teachers, friendsand her family after she published something?Because in her mind, they are dream killers. If she had to choose between her friends and her dreams, she’d like to choose her dreams.2. How did her new friend encourage her to write?By making her be self-confident.3. Did Linda find it easy to write a book when she lived on a farmin Oklahoma?No. She had a lot of daily household chores to do on the farm and it took her nine months to finish a book.4. What did Linda receive from the publisher a month after shesent the manuscript of her first book?She received a contract, an advance on royalties and a request to start working on another book.5. Was her first book well received? How do you know?Yes. It was translated into 15 languages and sold worldwide. She appeared on TV show and traveled from New York to California and Canada on promotion tour, it even became required reading in Native American School in Canada.For Part 3 InterviewDirections: Linda is a successful writer now. She is promoting hernewly published book on an interview. Act yourself as Linda and answer the questions raised by reporters.Tip: college, degree, qualification, family children, books published, secret of my success◆Detailed ReadingHave you ever dreamed of becoming a writer, only to be put off by fears that you lacked the ability? If so, then reading Linda Stafford’s story will have you reaching for your pen with renewed hope.I Never Write RightLinda StaffordWhen I was 15, I announced to my English class that I was going to write and illustrate(illustrate: v.1) add pictures to (something written)2) show the meaning of (something) by giving related examples my own books. Half of the students nearly fell out of their chairs laughing.( 1. What does the sentence imply?The students were laughing at her. They didn’t believe that she could write something.2. Translate the sentence into Chinese.当时有一半同学大笑不止,差一点从他们座位上摔出去)genius: n.1) (a person of) very great ability 2) a special ability 注:genius 语气最强,指智力水平超越大多数优秀人才的一种独特理解;gift 强调天生的特性和技能,但与独创性无关。
True HeightLook at the following two sayings and then see if the story of Michael Stone bears out the points they make.The greater the obstacle, the more glory in overcoming it.-- MolièreWhen it is dark enough, you can see the stars.-- Charles A. Beard读一读以下两则名言,想一想迈克尔·斯通的故事是否印证了其间的道理。
障碍越是巨大,逾越它也就越感自豪。
——莫里哀只有天空漆黑时,你才可以看到星星。
——查尔斯·A·比尔德David Naster 1 His palms were sweating. He needed a towel to dry his grip. The sun was as hot as the competition he faced today at the National Junior Olympics. The pole was set at 17 feet. That was three inches higher than his personal best. Michael Stone confronted the most challenging day of his pole-vaulting career.真正的高度大卫·纳史特他手心在出汗。
他需要用毛巾把握竿的手擦干。
太阳火辣辣的,与他今天在全国少年奥林匹克运动会上所面临的竞争一样热烈。
横杆升到了17英尺。
比他个人的最高纪录高出3 英寸。
迈克尔·斯通面临的是其撑竿跳高生涯中最具挑战性的一天。
2 The stands were still filled with about 20,000 people, even though the final race had ended an hour earlier. The pole vault is truly the highlight of any track and field competition. It combines the grace of a gymnast with the strength of a body builder. It also has the element of flying, and the thought of flying as high as a two-story building is a mere fantasy to anyone watching such an event.尽管赛跑决赛一小时前就已经结束,看台上仍然观众满座,足有20,000人上下。
Unit5课文翻译课文AWill you be a worker or a laborer?你想做工作者还是劳役者?1.一个人要想真正快乐,必须觉得自己既自由又重要。
如果觉得自己是受社会逼迫而做自己不喜欢的工作,或者自己喜欢的工作被认为没价值或不重要而遭社会忽视,那他绝不会快乐。
在一个奴隶制度严格说来已经被废除的社会里,工作的社会含义、工作的价值和薪水,已经把许多劳役者降格为现代奴隶——“薪奴”。
2.如果人们的工作对自己有负面的影响,但为了遵从社会的期望或者挣钱养家糊口而被迫必须继续工作,那么他们就被认为是劳役者。
劳役的对立面是玩乐。
当我们玩游戏时,我们很享受正在做的事情,但这仅仅是个人娱乐。
社会对我们何时玩乐或者是否玩乐并不关心。
3.处于劳役和玩乐之间的就是工作。
如果人们的个人兴趣跟社会付酬让他们做的工作相吻合,他们就被称为工作者。
社会上看来一定是苦工的事情对个人来说却是自在的玩乐活动。
一份活到底应定为工作还是劳役并不取决于其本身,而是承担这份活的个人感受。
比如,二者的区别与是体力活还是脑力活或尊严的高低没有关联。
温室里满身尘土的园丁可能是工作者,而衣冠楚楚的市长则可能是一个不开心的劳役者!4.人们对自己工作的态度决定了一切。
对工作者而言,闲暇只是为了更有效地工作而需要放松休息的时间。
因此,工作者更倾向于投入更多的时间工作,而花在休闲上的时间并非很多,而是很少。
而对劳役者而言,休闲意味着从被迫状态中得到自主。
因此,他们自然会想,花在劳作上的时间越少,自在玩乐的时间越多,则越好。
5.除了花在闲暇上的时间不同,工作者和劳役者的区别还在于他们从工作中获得的个人满足感不同。
工作者喜欢自己的工作,感觉更快乐,更轻松,通常对自己的生活更满意。
他们工作起来也会更勤奋,更精细,因为他们对自己的工作已经产生了一种自豪感。
相反,由于劳役者的唯一动力是挣生活费,他们觉得每天花在苦差上的时间是一种浪费,不会让自己快乐。
第五单元残忍课文A有些人似乎容易了解:他们的个性在初次交往时就表露无遗。
然而,外表可能具有欺骗性。
患难之交S.毛姆三十年来,我一直研究我的人类同胞,但至今了解不多。
每当有人跟我说他对一个人的第一次印象向来不错的时候,我就耸耸肩。
我想这种人不是无知,就是自大。
拿我自己来说,我发现,认识一个人的时间越长,我就越感到困惑。
我产生这些想法,是因为我在今天早上的报纸上看到爱德华·海德·伯顿在神户去世的消息。
他是个商人,在日本经商多年。
我跟他并不熟,但是对他挺有兴趣,因为有一次他让我大吃一惊。
要不是听他亲口讲述这个故事,我根本不会相信他能做出这种事来。
这件事之所以特别令人惊讶,是因为无论是外表还是风度,他都让人想到一种非常明确的类型。
要说真有表里如一的人的话,那就是此公了。
他个子很小,身高不过5英尺4英寸,身材纤细,白头发、蓝眼睛,红红的脸上布满皱纹。
我估计自己认识他时,他大约有60岁光景。
他向来衣着整洁素雅,合乎他的年龄和身份。
伯顿的办事处设在神户,但他常常到横滨宋。
有一次,我正好因为等船,要在那里呆几天,在英国俱乐部经人介绍与他相识。
我们在一起玩桥牌。
他打得不错,牌风也好。
无论在玩牌的时候,还是在后来一起喝酒的时候,他的话都不多,但说的话却都合情合理。
他挺幽默,但并不咋呼。
他在俱乐部里似乎人缘不错,后来,在他走了以后,人家都说他是个顶呱呱的人。
事有凑巧,我们俩都住在格兰德大酒店。
第二天他请我吃饭。
我见到了他的太太——一位肥肥胖胖、满面笑容的半老妇人——和他的两个女儿。
这显然是和睦恩爱的一家人。
我想,伯顿当时给我印象最深的主要还是他这个人和善。
他那双温和的蓝眼睛有种令人愉快的神情。
他说话的声音轻柔;你无法想象他会提高嗓门大发雷霆;他的笑容和蔼可亲。
这个人吸引你,是因为你从他身上感到他对别人的真正的爱。
同时他也喜欢玩牌,喝鸡尾酒,他能绘声绘色地讲个来劲儿的段子什么的,他年轻时多少还是个运动员呢。
Unit 3 LyingText A The Truth About Lying1. I've been wanting to write on a subject that intrigues and challenges me: the subject of lying. I've found it very difficult to do. Everyone I've talked to has a quite intense and personal but oftenrather intolerant point of view about what we can —and can nevernever — tell lies about. I've finally reached the conclusion that Ican't present any ultimate conclusions, for too many people would promptly disagree. Instead, I'd like to present a series of moral puzzles, all concerned with lying. I'll tell you what I think about them. Do you agree?Social Lies2. Most of the people I've talked with say that they find social lying acceptable and necessary. They think it's the civilized way for folks to behave. Without these little white lies, they say, our relationships would be short and brutish and nasty. It's arrogant, they say, to insist on being so incorruptible and so brave that you cause other people unnecessary embarrassment or pain by compulsively assailing them with your honesty. I basically agree. What about you?3. Will you say to people, when it simply isn't true, "I like your new hairdo," "You're looking much better," "it's so nice to see you," "I had a wonderful time"?4. Will you praise hideous presents and homely kids?5. Will you decline invitations with "We're busy that night — so sorry we can't come," when the truth is you'd rather stay home than dine with the So-and-sos?6. And even though, as I do, you may prefer the polite evasion of "You really cooked up a storm "instead of "The soup" —which tastes like warmed-over coffee —"is wonderful," will you, if you must, proclaim it wonderful?7. There's one man I know who absolutely refuses to tell social lies. "I can't play that game," he says; "I'm simply not made that way." And his answer to the argument that saying nice things to someonedoesn't cost anything is, "Yes, it does — it destroys your credibility." Now, he won't, unsolicited, offer his views on thepainting you just bought, but you don't ask his frank opinion unless you want frank, and his silence at those moments when the rest of us liars are muttering, "Isn't it lovely?" is, for the most part, eloquent enough. My friend does not indulge in what he calls "flattery, false praise and mellifluous comments." When others tell fibs he will not go along. He says that social lying is lying, that little white lies are still lies. And he feels that telling lies is morally wrong. What about you?Peace-Keeping Lies8. Many people tell peace-keeping lies: lies designed to avoid irritation or argument, lies designed to shelter the liar from possible blame or pain; lies (or so it is rationalized) designed to keep trouble at bay without hurting anyone.9. I tell these lies at times, and yet I always feel they're wrong.I understand why we tell them, but still they feel wrong. And whenever I lie so that someone won't disapprove of me or think less of me or holler at me, I feel I'm a bit of a coward, I feel I'm dodging responsibility, I feel...guilty. What about you?10. Do you, when you're late for a date because you overslept, say that you're late because you got caught in a traffic jam?11. Do you, when you forget to call a friend, say that you called several times but the line was busy?12. Do you, when you didn't remember that it was your father's birthday, say that his present must be delayed in the mail?13. And when you're planning a weekend in New York City and you're not in the mood to visit your mother, who lives there, do you conceal —with a lie, if you must — the fact that you'll be in New York? Or do you have the courage — or is it the cruelty? — to say, "I'll be in New York, but sorry — I don't plan on seeing you"?14. (Dave and his wife Elaine have two quite different points of view on this very subject. He calls her a coward. She says she's being wise. He says she must assert her right to visit New York sometimes and not see her mother. To which she always patiently replies: "Why should we have useless fights? My mother's too old to change. We get along much better when I lie to her.")15. Finally, do you keep the peace by telling your husband lies on the subject of money? Do you reduce what you really paid for your shoes?And in general do you find yourself ready, willing and able to lie to him when you make absurd mistakes or lose or break things?16. "I used to have a romantic idea that part of intimacy was confessing every dumb thing that you did to your husband. But after a couple of years of that," says Laura, "haveI changed my mind!"17. And having changed her mind, she finds herself telling peacekeeping lies. And yes, I tell them too. What about you?Protective Lies18. Protective lies are lies folks tell —often quite seriouslies —because they're convinced that the truth would be too damaging. They lie because they feel there are certain human values that supersede the wrong of having lied. They lie, not for personalgain, but because they believe it's for the good of the personthey're lying to. They lie to those they love, to those who trust them most of all, on the grounds that breaking this trust is justified.19. They may lie to their children on money or marital matters.20. They may lie to the dying about the state of their health.21. They may lie to their closest friend because the truth about her talents or son or psyche would be — or so they insist — utterly devastating.22. I sometimes tell such lies, but I'm aware that it's quite presumptuous to claim I know what's best for others to know. That's called playing God . That's called manipulation and control. And wenever can be sure, once we start to juggle lies, just where they'll land, exactly where they'll roll.23. And furthermore, we may find ourselves lying in order to backup the lies that are backing up the lie we initially told.24. And furthermore —let's be honest —if conditions were reversed, we certainly wouldn't want anyone lying to us.25. Yet, having said all that, I still believe that there are times when protective lies must nonetheless be told. What about you?Trust-Keeping Lies26. Another group of lies are trust-keeping lies, lies that involve triangulation, with A (that's you) telling lies to B on behalf of C (whose trust you'd promised to keep). Most people concede that onceyou've agreed not to betray a friend's confidence, you can't betray it, even if you must lie. But I've talked with people who don't want you telling them anything that they might be called on to lie about.27. "I don't tell lies for myself," says Fran, "and I don't want to have to tell them for other people." Which means, she agrees, that ifher best friend is having an affair, she absolutely doesn't want to know about it.28. "Are you saying," her best friend asks, "that you'd betray me?"29. Fran is very pained but very adamant. "I wouldn't want to betray you, so…don't tell me anything about it."30. Fran's best friend is shocked. What about you?31. Do you believe you can have close friends if you're not prepared to receive their deepest secrets?32. Do you believe you must always lie for your friends?33. Do you believe, if your friend tells a secret that turns out to be quite immoral or illegal, that once you've promised to keep it, you must keep it?34. And what if your friend were your boss — if you were perhaps one of the President's men — would you betray or lie for him over, say, Watergate?35. As you can see, these issues get terribly sticky.36. It's my belief that once we've promised to keep a trust, we must tell lies to keep it. I also believe that we can't tell Watergate lies. And if these two statements strike you as quite contradictory,you're right —they're quite contradictory. But for now they're the best I can do. What about you?37. There are those who have no talent for lying.38. "Over the years, I tried to lie," a friend of mine explained, "but I always got found out and I always got punished. I guess I gavemyself away because I feel guilty about any kind of lying. It looks as if I'm stuck with telling the truth."39. For those of us, however, who are good at telling lies, for those of us who lie and don't get caught, the question of whether or not to lie can be a hard and serious moral problem. I liked the remark of a friend of mine who said, "I'm willing to lie. But just as a lastresort — the truth's always better."40. "Because," he explained, "though others may completely accept the lie I'm telling, I don't."41. I tend to feel that way too.42. What about you?关于说谎的真相朱迪斯·维奥斯特我一直想写一个令我深感兴趣的话题:关于说谎的问题。
Unit 1 hit the nail on the head 恰到好处Have you ever watched a clumsy man hammering a nail into a box? He hits it first to one side, then to another, perhaps knocking it over completely, so that in the end he only gets half of it into the wood. A skillful carpenter, on the other hand, will drive the nail with a few firm, deft blows, hitting it each time squarely on the head. So with language; the good craftsman will choose words that drive home his point firmly and exactly. A word that is more or less right, a loose phrase, an ambiguous expression, a vague adjective(模糊的形容词), will not satisfy a writer who aims at clean English. He will try always to get the word that is completely right for his purpose.右敲敲,说不准还会将整个钉子锤翻,半截。
(贴切的) phrase for this. They speak of “le(一丝不苟的) writers, like Flaubert, who spent days trying to get one or two sentences exactly right. Words are many and various; they are subtle(微妙的) and delicate(细腻的) in their different shades(色调) of meaning, and it is not easy to find the ones that express precisely(正是,恰恰) what we want to say. It is not only a matter of having a good command of language and a fairly wide vocabulary; it is also necessary to think hard and to observe accurately. Choosing words is part of the process of realization, of defining our thoughts and feelings for ourselves, as well as for those who hear or read our words. Someone once remarked: “How can I know what I think till I see what I say?”this sounds stupid, but there is a great deal of truth in it.法国人有一个很贴切的短语来表达这样一个意思,即“le motjuste”, 恰到好处的词。
Unit 1 hit the nail on the head 恰到好处Have you ever watched a clumsy man hammering a nail into a box? He hits it first to one side, then to another, perhaps knocking it over completely, so that in the end he only gets half of it into the wood. A skillful carpenter, on the other hand, will drive the nail with a few firm, deft blows, hitting it each time squarely on the head. So with language; the good craftsman will choose words that drive home his point firmly and exactly. A word that is more or less right, a loose phrase, an ambiguous expression, a vague adjective(模糊的形容词), will not satisfy a writer who aims at clean English. He will try always to get the word that is completely right for his purpose.你见过一个笨手笨脚的男人往箱子上钉钉子吗?只见他左敲敲,右敲敲,说不准还会将整个钉子锤翻,结果敲来敲去到头来只敲进了半截。
而娴熟的木匠就不这么干。
他每敲一下都会坚实巧妙地正对着钉头落下去,一钉到底。
语言也是如此。
Unit 5 I Never Write RightLinda StaffordWhen I was 15, I announced to my English class that I was going to write and illustrate(illustrate: v.1) add pictures to (something written)2) show the meaning of (something) by giving related examples my own books. Half of the students nearly fell out of their chairs laughing.“Don’t be silly. Only geniuses can become writers,” the English teacher said. “And you are getting a D this semester.”I was so embarrassed that I burst into tears. That night I wrote a short, sad poem about broken dreams and mailed it to the Capper’s Weekly. (To my astonishment they published it, and sent me two dollars. I was a published and paid writer! I showed my teacher and fellow students. They laughed.“Just plain dumb luck,” the teacher said.I’d tasted success. I’d sold the first thing I’d ever written. That was more than any of them had done, and if it was “just plain dumb luck,” that was fine with me.During the next two years I sold dozens of poems, letters, jokes and recipes. By the time I graduated from high school (with a C-minus average), I had scrapbooks filled with my published work. I never mentioned my writing to my teachers, friends or my family again. They were dream killers. And if people must choose between their friends and dreams, they must always choose the latter.But sometimes you do find a friend who supports your dreams. “It’s easy to write a book,” my new friend told me. “You can do it.”“I don’t know if I’m smart enough,” I said, suddenly f eeling 15 again and hearing echoes of laughter.“Nonsense!” she said. “Anyone can write a book if they want to.”I had four children at the time, and the oldest was only four. We lived on a goat farm in Oklahoma, miles from anyone. All I had to do each day was take care of four kids, milk goats, and do the cooking, laundry and gardening.While the children slept, I typed on my ancient typewriter. I wrote what I felt. It took nine months, just like a baby.I chose a publisher at random and put the manuscript in an empty diapers package, the only box I could find. The letter I enclosed read: “I wrote this book myself, and I hope you like it. I also drew the illustrations. Chapters 6 and 12 are my favorites. Thank you.”I tied a string around the diaper box and mailed it without a self-addressed stamped envelope, and without making a copy of the manuscript. A month later I received a contract, an advance on royalties and a request to start working on another book.Crying Wind became a bestseller, was translated into 15 languages and sold worldwide. I appeared on TV talk shows during the day and changed diapers at night.I traveled from New York to California and Canada on promotional tours. My first book also became required reading in Native American schools in Canada.It took six months to write my next book. My Searching Heart also became a bestseller. My next novel, When I Give My Heart, was finished in only three weeks. People ask what college I attended, what degree I have, and what qualifications I have to be a writer. The answer is none. I just write. I’m not a genius, I’m not gifted and don’t write right. I’m not disciplined, either, and spend more time with my children and friends than I do writing.I didn’t own a thesaurus until four years ago and I use a small Webster’s dictionary that I bought for 89 cents. I use an electric typewriter that I paid $129 for six years ago. I’ve never used a word processor. I do all the cooking, cleaning and laundry for a family of six and fit my writing in a few minutes here and there.I write everything in longhand while sitting on the sofa with my four kids, eating pizza and watching TV. When the book is finished, I type it and mail it to the publisher.I’ve written eight books. Four have bee n published, and three are still out with the publishers. One stinks.To all those who dream of writing, I’m shouting at you, “Yes, you can! Yes, you can!” I don’t write right, but I’ve beaten the odds.Writing isn’t difficult, it’s fun, and anyone can wr ite a book if they set their mind on it. Of course, a little dumb luck doesn’t hurt.你是否曾梦想成为一名作家,却因为担心自己缺乏这方面的才能而却步?如果是这样,那么读一读琳达·斯塔福德的故事就会使你怀着重燃的希望拿起笔来。
我写作一向是野路子在我十五岁的时候,我在我们英语课上宣布说我要写书并为自己的书作插图。
当时有一半同学大笑不止,差一点从他们座位上摔出去。
"别犯傻了。
只有天才能成为作家。
"英语老师说,"而你这学期的英语只能得D。
"我感到很难堪,一下子哭了起来。
当天晚上我就写了一首短诗,抒发梦想破灭的悲哀,然后把它寄给了《卡珀周刊》。
令我惊讶的是,他们竟发表了我的诗,还寄给了我两美元。
我成了一个发表过作品拿到过稿费的作家了!我拿给老师和同学们看。