Towards Robust Distributed Systems
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:327.38 KB
- 文档页数:12
大数据专业前景作文英语Title: The Bright Future of Big Data: A Perspective on the Career Opportunities in the Field。
Introduction。
In the era of information explosion, the significance of big data cannot be overstated. The exponential growth of data generated by various sources has led to the emergence of a new field big data. This essay delves into the promising career prospects within the realm of big data, highlighting its importance, job opportunities, and future trends.Importance of Big Data。
Big data analytics has revolutionized the way businesses operate across industries. By harnessing the power of vast datasets, organizations can derive valuable insights, make data-driven decisions, and gain acompetitive edge in the market. From improving customer experiences to optimizing operational efficiency, the applications of big data are diverse and far-reaching.Job Opportunities in Big Data。
HeterogeneousComputer networks typically are heterogeneous. For example, the internal network of a small software company might be made up of multiple computing platforms. There might be a mainframe that handles transactional database access for order entry, UNIX workstations that supply hardware simulation environments and a software development backbone, personal computers that run Windows and provide desktop office automation tools, and other specialized systems such as network computers, telephony systems, routers, and measurement equipment. Small sections of a given network may be homogeneous, but the larger a network is, the more varied and diverse its composition is likely to be.There are several reasons for this heterogeneity. One obvious reason is that technology changes over time. Because networks tend to evolve rather than being built all at once, the best technologies from different time periods end up coexisting on the network. In this context, "best" may refer to qualities such as the lowest cost, the highest performance, the least expensive mass storage, the most transactions per minute, the tightest security, the flashiest graphics, or other qualities deemed important at the time of purchase. Another reason for network heterogeneity is that one size does not fit all. Any given combination of computer, operating system, and networking platform will work best for only a subset of the computing activities performed within a network. Still another reason is that diversity within a network can make it more resilient because any problems in a given machine type, operating system, or application are unlikely to affect other networked systems running different operating systems and applications.The factors that lead to heterogeneous computer networks are largely inevitable; thus, developers of practical distributed systems, whether they like it or not, must cope with heterogeneity. Whereas developing software for any distributed system is difficult, developing software for a heterogeneous distributed system sometimes borders on the impossible. Such software must deal with all the problems normally encountered in distributed systems programming, such as the failure of some of the systems in the network, partitioning of the network, problems associated with resource contention and sharing, and security-related risks. If you add heterogeneity to the picture, some of these problems become more acute, and new ones crop up.For example, problems you encounter while porting a networked application for use on a new platform in the network may result in two or more versions of the same application. If you make any changes to any version of the application, you must go back and modify all the other versions appropriately and then test them individually and in their various combinations to make sure they all work properly. The degree of difficulty presented by this situation increases dramatically as the number of different platforms in the network rises.Keep in mind that heterogeneity in this context does not refer only to computing hardware and operating systems. Writing a robust distributed application from top to bottom!afor example, from a custom graphicl user interface all the way down to the network transports and protocols!ais tremedously difficult for almost any real-world application because of the overwhelming complexity and the number of details involved.As a result, developers of distributed applications tend to make heavy use of tools and libraries. This means that distributed applications are themselves heterogeneous, often glued together from a number of layered applications and libraries. Unfortunately, in many cases, as the distributed system grows, the chance decreases dramatically that all the applications and libraries that compose it were actually designed to work together.At a very general level, you can tackle the problem of developing applications for heterogeneous distributed systems by following two key rules.Find platform-independent models and abstractions that you can apply to help solve a wide variety of problems.Hide as much low-level complexity as possible without sacrificing too much performance. These rules are general enough to be used to develop any portable application whether or not it is distributed. However, the additional complexities introduced by distribution make each rule carry more weight. Using the right abstractions and models can essentially provide a new homogeneous application development layer over the top of all the distributed heterogeneous complexity. This layer hides low-level details and allows application developers to solve their immediate problems without having to first solve the low-level networking details for all the diverse computing platforms used by their applications.异构计算机网络是典型的异构体系。
1. 大数据的核心特征不包括以下哪一项?A. 高速度B. 高价值C. 高多样性D. 高容量2. Hadoop的核心组件包括哪些?A. HDFS和MapReduceB. HDFS和YARNC. MapReduce和YARND. HDFS、MapReduce和YARN3. HDFS的默认块大小是多少?A. 64MBB. 128MBC. 256MBD. 512MB4. MapReduce框架中,Map函数的主要作用是什么?A. 数据排序B. 数据过滤C. 数据分组D. 数据映射5. YARN的主要组件不包括以下哪一项?A. ResourceManagerB. NodeManagerC. ApplicationMasterD. JobTracker6. 以下哪个不是NoSQL数据库的类型?A. 键值存储B. 文档存储C. 列存储D. 关系存储7. 在分布式系统中,CAP理论指的是什么?A. 一致性、可用性、分区容错性B. 一致性、可用性、性能C. 一致性、分区容错性、性能D. 可用性、分区容错性、性能8. 以下哪个是Apache Spark的主要组件?A. Spark CoreB. Spark SQLC. Spark StreamingD. 以上都是9. 在Spark中,RDD的全称是什么?A. Resilient Distributed DatasetB. Remote Distributed DatasetC. Reliable Distributed DatasetD. Robust Distributed Dataset10. 以下哪个不是Spark的优化技术?A. 内存计算B. 数据本地性C. 任务并行化D. 数据压缩11. 在HBase中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 行B. 列C. 表D. 区域12. 以下哪个是HBase的特性?A. 强一致性B. 事务支持C. 自动分片D. 以上都是13. 在分布式计算中,Zookeeper的主要作用是什么?A. 数据存储B. 配置管理C. 分布式协调D. 任务调度14. 以下哪个是Kafka的主要特性?A. 高吞吐量B. 低延迟C. 持久性D. 以上都是15. 在Kafka中,消息的基本单位是什么?A. 主题B. 分区C. 消息D. 消费者16. 以下哪个是Storm的主要组件?A. SpoutB. BoltC. TopologyD. 以上都是17. 在Storm中,消息的可靠性是通过什么机制实现的?A. ACK机制B. NACK机制C. 重试机制D. 以上都是18. 以下哪个是Flink的主要特性?A. 流处理B. 批处理C. 状态管理D. 以上都是19. 在Flink中,数据流的基本单位是什么?A. 数据集B. 数据流C. 数据窗口D. 数据状态20. 以下哪个是Elasticsearch的主要特性?A. 全文搜索B. 分布式C. 实时分析D. 以上都是21. 在Elasticsearch中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 索引B. 类型C. 文档D. 字段22. 以下哪个是MongoDB的主要特性?A. 文档存储B. 自动分片C. 索引支持D. 以上都是23. 在MongoDB中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 集合B. 文档C. 字段D. 索引24. 以下哪个是Cassandra的主要特性?A. 列存储B. 高可用性C. 可扩展性D. 以上都是25. 在Cassandra中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 键空间B. 列族C. 列D. 行26. 以下哪个是Redis的主要特性?A. 键值存储B. 内存存储C. 持久化D. 以上都是27. 在Redis中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 键B. 值C. 哈希D. 列表28. 以下哪个是Neo4j的主要特性?A. 图存储B. 查询语言C. 索引支持D. 以上都是29. 在Neo4j中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 节点B. 关系C. 属性D. 标签30. 以下哪个是Presto的主要特性?A. 分布式SQL查询B. 高性能C. 兼容多种数据源D. 以上都是31. 在Presto中,数据查询的基本单位是什么?A. 查询B. 表C. 列D. 行32. 以下哪个是Impala的主要特性?A. 分布式SQL查询B. 高性能C. 兼容多种数据源D. 以上都是33. 在Impala中,数据查询的基本单位是什么?A. 查询B. 表C. 列D. 行34. 以下哪个是Druid的主要特性?A. 实时分析B. 列存储C. 高性能D. 以上都是35. 在Druid中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 数据源B. 段C. 列D. 行36. 以下哪个是ClickHouse的主要特性?A. 列存储B. 高性能C. 实时分析D. 以上都是37. 在ClickHouse中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 表B. 列C. 行D. 分区38. 以下哪个是TiDB的主要特性?A. 分布式B. 兼容MySQLC. 高可用性D. 以上都是39. 在TiDB中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 表B. 列C. 行D. 分区40. 以下哪个是Kudu的主要特性?A. 列存储B. 高性能C. 实时分析D. 以上都是41. 在Kudu中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 表B. 列C. 行D. 分区42. 以下哪个是Alluxio的主要特性?A. 内存存储B. 分布式C. 兼容多种存储系统D. 以上都是43. 在Alluxio中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 文件B. 目录C. 块D. 以上都是44. 以下哪个是Pulsar的主要特性?A. 消息队列B. 分布式C. 高吞吐量D. 以上都是45. 在Pulsar中,消息的基本单位是什么?A. 主题B. 分区C. 消息D. 消费者46. 以下哪个是Beam的主要特性?A. 统一编程模型B. 兼容多种执行引擎C. 支持多种数据处理模式D. 以上都是47. 在Beam中,数据处理的基本单位是什么?A. 管道B. 转换C. 数据集D. 以上都是48. 以下哪个是Flink的主要特性?A. 流处理B. 批处理C. 状态管理D. 以上都是49. 在Flink中,数据流的基本单位是什么?A. 数据集B. 数据流C. 数据窗口D. 数据状态50. 以下哪个是Elasticsearch的主要特性?A. 全文搜索B. 分布式C. 实时分析D. 以上都是51. 在Elasticsearch中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 索引B. 类型C. 文档D. 字段52. 以下哪个是MongoDB的主要特性?A. 文档存储B. 自动分片C. 索引支持D. 以上都是53. 在MongoDB中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 集合B. 文档C. 字段D. 索引54. 以下哪个是Cassandra的主要特性?A. 列存储B. 高可用性C. 可扩展性D. 以上都是55. 在Cassandra中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 键空间B. 列族C. 列D. 行56. 以下哪个是Redis的主要特性?A. 键值存储B. 内存存储C. 持久化D. 以上都是57. 在Redis中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 键B. 值C. 哈希D. 列表58. 以下哪个是Neo4j的主要特性?A. 图存储B. 查询语言C. 索引支持D. 以上都是59. 在Neo4j中,数据存储的基本单位是什么?A. 节点B. 关系C. 属性D. 标签60. 以下哪个是Presto的主要特性?A. 分布式SQL查询B. 高性能C. 兼容多种数据源D. 以上都是61. 在Presto中,数据查询的基本单位是什么?A. 查询B. 表C. 列D. 行62. 以下哪个是Impala的主要特性?A. 分布式SQL查询B. 高性能C. 兼容多种数据源D. 以上都是63. 在Impala中,数据查询的基本单位是什么?A. 查询B. 表C. 列D. 行64. 以下哪个是Druid的主要特性?A. 实时分析B. 列存储C. 高性能D. 以上都是答案1. B2. D3. B4. D5. D6. D7. A8. D9. A10. D11. A12. C13. C14. D15. C16. D17. D18. D19. B20. D21. C22. D23. B24. D25. B26. D27. A28. D29. A30. D31. A32. D33. A34. D35. B36. D37. A38. D39. A40. D41. A42. D43. D44. D45. C46. D47. D48. D49. B50. D51. C52. D53. B54. D55. B56. D57. A58. D59. A60. D61. A62. D63. A64. D。
安保系统变化英语作文Evolution of Security Systems.In today's interconnected world, the need for robust and evolving security systems has become paramount. Security systems, once limited to basic locks and surveillance cameras, have undergone significant transformations, incorporating cutting-edge technology to ensure tighter safety measures. This essay delves into the evolving landscape of security systems, discussing their advancements, challenges, and future prospects.Evolution of Technology.The evolution of security systems is closely linked to the advancements in technology. In the early days, physical security measures like locks, gates, and guards were the norm. However, with the advent of technology, these measures have been augmented by digital and electronic systems. CCTV cameras, for instance, have become aubiquitous sight in both commercial and residential settings. These cameras provide real-time monitoring and can be used to record evidence in case of any untoward incident.With the further development of technology, security systems have become more intelligent and interconnected. Smart security systems now incorporate features like motion detection, facial recognition, and object recognition. These systems can identify suspicious activities and alert the authorities promptly. Additionally, with theintegration of the Internet of Things (IoT), security systems can now be accessed and controlled remotely, enabling users to monitor their premises even when they are not physically present.Challenges and Solutions.Despite the advancements in technology, security systems face several challenges. One of the primary challenges is the ever-evolving nature of criminal activities. Criminals are becoming more sophisticated andare using advanced technology to carry out their criminal activities. This requires security systems to be constantly updated and upgraded to counter these new threats.Another challenge is the issue of privacy. With the increasing use of surveillance cameras and other electronic devices, concerns about privacy have been raised. It is crucial to strike a balance between security and privacy, ensuring that the former does not infringe upon the latter.To address these challenges, security systems need to be designed with scalability and adaptability in mind. They should be able to incorporate new technologies and features as they emerge, enabling them to keep up with the evolving threats. Additionally, strict privacy policies and ethical guidelines need to be followed to ensure that the privacy of individuals is protected.Future Prospects.Looking ahead, the future of security systems looks promising. With the continued advancement of technology, wecan expect even more sophisticated and intelligent security systems. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms are likely to play a pivotal role in this evolution. These algorithms can process and analyze vast amounts of data, enabling security systems to detect patterns and predict potential threats.Moreover, the integration of 5G technology will further enhance the capabilities of security systems. 5G's high speed and low latency will enable real-time data transmission and analysis, making security systems even more responsive and effective.Additionally, the convergence of multiple technologies, such as AI, IoT, and blockchain, could lead to the development of decentralized and distributed security systems. These systems would be less vulnerable to centralized attacks and could provide enhanced security and privacy protection.In conclusion, the evolution of security systems has been transformative, and it continues to adapt and evolvewith the advancements in technology. While challenges like criminal sophistication and privacy concerns remain, the future of security systems looks bright, with the potential to provide even stronger and more intelligent protection. As we move forward, it is crucial to strike a balance between security, privacy, and technology to create a safer and more secure world.。
人工智能英语作文四级Title: The Evolution and Impact of Artificial Intelligence.In today's rapidly advancing technological landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force,革命性的力量shaping the way we live, work, and interact with the world. AI, a field of computer science, aims to create machines capable of intelligent behavior, exhibiting characteristics such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving. While the concept of AI has existed for decades, recent advancements in computing power and algorithms have allowed for significant breakthroughs, leading to its increasing integration into our daily lives.The evolution of AI can be traced back to its inception in the 1950s, when the term "artificial intelligence" was coined by John McCarthy. Since then, AI has undergone several waves of development, each marked by significant advancements and challenges. The first wave, known assymbolic AI, focused on creating rule-based systems that could perform logical reasoning and problem-solving. However, these systems were limited by their inability to handle uncertainty and complexity.The second wave of AI, known as statistical learning or machine learning, shifted the focus towards building systems that could learn from data. These systems, based on statistical models, were able to identify patterns and make predictions without explicit programming. While this approach led to significant improvements in areas like speech recognition and image classification, it still suffered from limitations, such as the need for large amounts of labeled data and the inability to generalize beyond the trained domain.The third wave of AI, known as deep learning, has been 革命性的革命性的,transforming the field with its ability to process and understand unstructured data. Deep learning algorithms, based on artificial neural networks, are able to learn hierarchical representations of data, enabling them to capture complex patterns and relationships. Thishas led to breakthroughs in areas like computer vision, natural language processing, and reinforcement learning, among others.The impact of AI on society has been profound and far-reaching. In the realm of healthcare, AI has revolutionized diagnosis and treatment, enabling doctors to make more accurate predictions and decisions based on vast amounts of patient data. In industries like manufacturing and logistics, AI-powered robots and autonomous systems have increased efficiency and productivity, while reducing human error and operational costs.In the realm of technology, AI has transformed the way we interact with devices and services. Virtual assistants like Siri and Alexa use natural language processing to understand and respond to our queries, while recommender systems like those found on Netflix and Amazon personalize content based on our preferences and behaviors. These advancements have not only made our lives more convenient but have also given rise to new business models and opportunities.However, the rise of AI also presents challenges and ethical considerations. One of the most significantconcerns is the potential displacement of human workers by machines. As AI systems become more capable and efficient, there is a risk of job losses in sectors like manufacturing, customer service, and even professions like law and medicine. This raises questions about the need for policies and frameworks to ensure that the benefits of AI are distributed fairly across society.Another concern is the privacy and securityimplications of AI. As more data is collected and used to train AI systems, there is an increased risk of privacy breaches and misuse of personal information. This requires robust data protection measures and ethical guidelines to ensure that AI is developed and deployed responsibly.Despite these challenges, the future of AI looks bright. With continued advancements in technology and increasing investment in research and development, we can expect tosee more innovations in areas like autonomous vehicles,smart cities, and personalized medicine. These advancements will not only improve our lives but will also drive economic growth and create new opportunities for society.In conclusion, artificial intelligence has emerged as a transformative force in our world,革命性的力量shaping the way we live, work, and interact with technology. Its evolution from symbolic AI to deep learning has led to significant breakthroughs in areas like healthcare, manufacturing, and technology. However, as we move forward, it is crucial that we address the ethical and societal challenges presented by AI to ensure that its benefits are distributed fairly and responsibly across society.。
paxos协议Paxos Protocol。
The Paxos protocol is a consensus algorithm used in distributed systems to ensure the consistency of data across multiple nodes. It was first introduced by Leslie Lamport in 1989 and has since become a fundamental building block for distributed systems.At its core, the Paxos protocol is designed to allow a group of nodes to agree on a single value even in the presence of failures and network partitions. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity and consistency of data in distributed systems, where nodes may fail or become unreachable at any time.The Paxos protocol operates in phases, with each phase serving a specific purpose in the process of reaching a consensus. The three main phases of the Paxos protocol are:1. Prepare Phase: In this phase, a node called the "proposer" sends a prepare request to all other nodes with a proposal number. The nodes then respond with their current highest proposal number and the value associated with it. The proposer then selects the highest proposal number and corresponding value from the responses.2. Accept Phase: If the proposer successfully obtains the highest proposal number and value in the prepare phase, it sends an accept request to all nodes with the chosen value. The nodes then respond with either an acknowledgment or a rejection based on their current state. If the majority of nodes acknowledge the value, the proposer can proceed to the next phase.3. Learn Phase: In this final phase, the proposer informs all nodes of the chosen value, and they update their state accordingly. Once a majority of nodes have acknowledged the value in the accept phase, the consensus is reached, and the chosen value is considered decided.The Paxos protocol ensures safety, meaning that no two nodes will decide on different values, and liveness, meaning that the system will eventually reach a consensus as long as the network is functioning and the nodes are not all faulty.While the Paxos protocol is highly effective in achieving consensus in distributed systems, it is also complex and can be challenging to implement and understand. As a result, variations and simplifications of the Paxos protocol, such as Multi-Paxos and Fast Paxos, have been developed to make it more practical for real-world applications.In conclusion, the Paxos protocol is a crucial tool for achieving consensus in distributed systems, ensuring the consistency and reliability of data across multiple nodes. While it may be complex, its ability to handle failures and network partitions makes it an essential algorithm for building robust and reliable distributed systems.。
第52卷第7期电力系统保护与控制Vol.52 No.7 2024年4月1日Power System Protection and Control Apr. 1, 2024 DOI: 10.19783/ki.pspc.231276基于核仁聚类估计和数据驱动分布鲁棒优化的海量异构产消者联盟能量管理策略张智泉,陈晓杰,符杨,李振坤,邓莉荣(海上风电技术教育部工程研究中心(上海电力大学),上海 200090)摘要:随着分布式资源接入技术和可交易能源市场的快速发展,海量异构多能产消者电热能源共享和源荷强不确定性给联盟能量管理带来极大挑战。
基于此,提出一种基于核仁聚类估计和数据驱动分布鲁棒优化的海量异构多能产消者联盟能量管理策略。
该方法以联盟及个体在多重不确定性影响下的社会福利最大为目标,建立了考虑电热网络动态差异性的海量产消者能量管理模型,以解决联盟能量管理可扩展性、公平性和隐私性难以兼顾的问题。
另外,考虑到核仁计算的复杂度和源荷不确定性的不利影响,分别提出了基于高斯混合聚类的核仁估计方法和基于数据驱动Wasserstein距离的分布鲁棒优化模型,实现了模型求解速度与精度的均衡。
算例结果表明,所提方法有效提升了产消者联盟在多重不确定性影响下的社会福利,实现了联盟能量管理可扩展性、公平性和隐私性的均衡,促进了更多的产消者参与本地能源点对点(peer-to-peer, P2P)交易。
关键词:产消者;联盟能量管理;社会福利;核仁;不确定性Energy management strategy for massive heterogeneous prosumers alliance based on nucleolar clustering estimation and data-driven distributionally robust optimizationZHANG Zhiquan, CHEN Xiaojie, FU Yang, LI Zhenkun, DENG Lirong(Engineering Research Center of Offshore Wind Technology Ministry of Education(Shanghai University of Electric Power), Shanghai 200090, China)Abstract: There has been rapid development of distributed resource access technology and the tradeable energy market.Along with this, thermal energy sharing and strong uncertainty of source load for massive heterogeneous multi-energy producers and consumers bring great challenges to energy management of an alliance. Based on this, this paper proposes an energy management strategy for a massive heterogeneous multi-energy consumer alliance based on nucleolar cluster estimation and data-driven optimization of a distributed robust system. With the objective of maximizing the social welfare of the alliance and individuals under the influence of multiple uncertainties, the energy management model of a massive heterogeneous consumer alliance considering the dynamic differences of the electric heating network is established. This is to solve the problem that the scalability, fairness and privacy of alliance energy management are difficult to take into account. In addition, considering the complexity of nucleolar computation and the adverse effects of source load uncertainty, this paper proposes a nucleolar estimation method based on Gaussian mixture clustering and distributed robust optimization model based on data-driven Wasserstein distance, respectively, to achieve a balance between model solving speed and accuracy. The numerical results show that the proposed method effectively improves the social welfare of the producers and consumers alliance under the influence of multiple uncertainties, achieves the balance of scalability, fairness and privacy of the energy management of the alliance, and promotes more producers and consumers to participate in local energy peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Smart Grid Joint Fund (No. U2066214).Key words: prosumers; coalition energy management; social welfare; nucleolus; uncertainty基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目智能电网联合基金项目资助(U2066214);上海科学技术委员会项目资助(21010501200);新型电力系统运行与控制全国重点实验室开放基金课题(SKLD22KM19)张智泉,等基于核仁聚类估计和数据驱动分布鲁棒优化的海量异构产消者联盟能量管理策略- 99 -0 引言随着分布式资源接入技术和可交易能源市场的快速发展,越来越多的能源用户从传统“消费者”向“产消者”转变[1-3]。
节点方案英文Node SchemeIntroductionIn today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, the need for efficient and reliable networks is paramount. One crucial aspect of designing a network is determining the appropriate node scheme. A node scheme refers to the arrangement and configuration of network nodes, which are the essential building blocks of any network infrastructure. This article aims to explore the fundamental principles and considerations involved in devising a node scheme, focusing on key aspects such as scalability, redundancy, and network optimization.ScalabilityScalability is a vital factor when it comes to designing a node scheme. It refers to the network's ability to handle an increasing workload and expand in response to growing demands. To achieve scalability, a node scheme should incorporate modular architectures that allow for easy addition or removal of nodes without disrupting the entire network. Additionally, the use of virtualization technologies, such as cloud computing, can enhance scalability by enabling seamless resource allocation and management.RedundancyEnsuring network reliability is another crucial aspect of a well-designed node scheme. Redundancy, which involves duplicating network components, plays a significant role in achieving this goal. By incorporating redundantnodes, failures or disruptions in one part of the network can be mitigated as traffic is rerouted through alternative paths. Redundancy can be achieved at various levels, including hardware redundancy, where multiple physical devices are deployed, and software redundancy, which involves implementing failover mechanisms and backup systems.Network OptimizationOptimizing network performance is a key objective of any node scheme. This involves fine-tuning various parameters to ensure efficient data transmission and minimize latency. An effective node scheme should consider factors such as bandwidth allocation, routing protocols, and network traffic management. By applying load balancing techniques, network administrators can evenly distribute the workload across nodes, preventing bottlenecks and optimizing overall performance.Security ConsiderationsWhen designing a node scheme, security should be paramount. In an interconnected world, networks are vulnerable to various threats, such as unauthorized access, data breaches, and malware attacks. Implementing robust security measures, including authentication mechanisms, encryption protocols, and intrusion detection systems, is essential to safeguard network integrity. The node scheme should take into account these security considerations and provide a framework for secure data transmission and protection against potential threats.Case Study: Enterprise NetworkTo better understand the practical implementation of a node scheme, let's consider a case study of an enterprise network. In this scenario, the node scheme should cater to the organization's specific requirements, such as seamless communication, data exchange, and resource sharing.The node scheme for an enterprise network might consist of a centralized hub, where critical services and central data repositories are located. From this central hub, various branches or remote locations can be connected through distributed nodes, ensuring efficient communication and data synchronization. The deployment of redundant nodes at critical points within the network provides resilience and fault tolerance, minimizing downtime and ensuring business continuity.ConclusionIn conclusion, a well-designed node scheme is fundamental to building a robust and efficient network infrastructure. By considering scalability, redundancy, network optimization, and security, network architects can develop a node scheme that meets the specific requirements of any organization or application. Understanding the intricacies of node schemes is crucial in today's interconnected world, where networks are the backbone of modern communication and information exchange.。
分布式算法详解Distributed algorithms are a crucial component of modern computing systems, allowing for complex tasks to be broken down and executed across multiple nodes in a network. These algorithms are designed to ensure efficiency, fault tolerance, and scalability in distributed systems. They play a foundational role in enabling the seamless functioning of applications that span across multiple servers and devices.分布式算法是现代计算系统的关键组成部分,允许将复杂任务分解并在网络中的多个节点上执行。
这些算法旨在确保分布系统的效率、容错性和可伸缩性。
它们在使跨多个服务器和设备的应用程序无缝运行方面发挥着基础性作用。
One of the key challenges faced by distributed algorithms is achieving consensus among the different nodes in the network. Consensus algorithms aim to ensure that all nodes agree on a certain value or decision, even in the presence of faults or failures. This is critical for maintaining the integrity and reliability of the system, especially in scenarios where nodes may fail or behave maliciously.分布式算法面临的关键挑战之一是在网络中的不同节点之间达成共识。
第一章绪论1.简述Java技术体系的组成。
Java技术体系主要由三部分组成:Java平台标准版Java SE,Java平台企业版Java EE,以及Java 平台微缩版Java ME。
Java SE为Java桌面和工作组级应用的开发与运行提供了环境。
它的实现主要包括Java SE Development Kit(JDK)和Java SE Runtime Environment(JRE)。
Java SE提供了编写与运行Java Applet与Application的编译器、开发工具、运行环境与Java API。
Java EE 定义了基于组件的多层企业级应用的开发标准,面向企业级和高端服务器的Internet应用开发。
它基于Java SE,包括Enterprise JavaBeans(EJB),Java Servlets API以及Java Server Pages(JSP)等技术,并为企业级应用的开发提供了各种服务和工具。
Java ME是针对消费类电子设备如移动电话、电视置顶盒、汽车导航系统等的嵌入式计算的一组技术和规范。
2.Java的特征有哪些?简述这些特征的含义。
Java语言的特征包括:简单(Simple)、面向对象(Object oriented)、分布式(Distributed)、解释型(Interpreted)、健壮(Robust)、安全(Secure)、体系结构中立(Architecture neutral)、可移植(Portable)、高性能(High performance)、多线程(Multithreaded)和动态(Dynamic)●简单性:Java语言语法和语义都比较单纯,容易学习和使用。
另外,去掉C++中的指针,取消多重继承和运算符重载,内存管理由程序员移向Java内嵌的自动内存回收机制等●面向对象:作为一种面向对象的编程语言,Java不仅最为“纯洁”,也对面向对象方法学的支持也最为全面。
Intelligent Transportation Systems Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) have become an integral part of modern urban infrastructure, aiming to improve the efficiency, safety, and sustainability of transportation networks. However, like any technological advancement, ITS also comes with its own set of challenges and problems. In this response, we will explore some of the key issues surrounding ITS, including privacy concerns, cybersecurity threats, infrastructure integration, and societal impact. One of the foremost concerns related to ITS is the issue of privacy. With the implementation of technologies such as GPS tracking, smart traffic lights, and connected vehicles, there is a growing apprehension about the potential invasion of privacy. Citizens are worried about the collection and storage of their personal data, as well as the potential misuse of this information. As ITS continues to evolve, it is imperative for policymakers and industry stakeholders to address these privacy concerns through robust data protection regulations and transparent data usage policies. Another critical challenge facing ITS is the threat of cybersecurity breaches. As transportation systems become increasingly interconnected and reliant on digital infrastructure, they also become more susceptible to cyber attacks. The potential consequences of a cyber breach in the transportation sector are severe, ranging from traffic disruptions to compromised safety systems. To mitigate this risk, there needs to be a concerted effort to bolster the cybersecurity measures of ITS, including the implementation of robust encryption protocols, regular security audits, and the fostering of a cybersecurity-conscious culture within the industry. Furthermore, the successful integration of ITS into existing transportation infrastructure poses a significant challenge. Many cities and regions around the world have aging transportation systems that were not designed to accommodate the level of technological integration that ITS requires. This necessitates substantial investments in upgrading and modernizing the infrastructure to support the seamless operation of ITS. Additionally, there is a need for standardized protocols and communication systems to ensure interoperability between different ITS components and across various jurisdictions. In addition to technical and logistical challenges, ITS also has a profound societal impact that must be carefully considered. Thedeployment of advanced transportation technologies can lead to job displacementfor workers in traditional transportation sectors, such as taxi drivers and bus operators. Moreover, there is a risk of exacerbating existing social inequalities if the benefits of ITS are not equitably distributed across different communities. It is crucial for policymakers to proactively address these societal implications through targeted workforce development programs and inclusive policy frameworks that prioritize accessibility and affordability. Despite these challenges, it is important to recognize the immense potential of ITS in revolutionizing urban mobility. By leveraging real-time data analytics and predictive modeling, ITS has the capability to optimize traffic flow, reduce congestion, and minimize environmental impact. Moreover, the advent of autonomous vehicles and connected transportation systems holds the promise of significantly enhancing road safety and reducing the number of traffic accidents. It is imperative for stakeholders to work collaboratively in addressing the challenges associated with ITS, while harnessing its transformative potential to create more sustainable and efficient transportation networks for future generations.。
一类中立型马尔科夫跳变系统的随机稳定性条件Xinghua LiuDept. of Auto, School of Information Science and Technology Universityof Science and Technology of ChinaHefei, ChinaE-mail: salxh@Hongsheng XiDept. of Auto, School of Information Science and Technology Universityof Science and Technology of ChinaHefei, ChinaE-mail: xihs@摘要本文对确定性和非确定性中立型系统的时变延时和马尔科夫跳变参数进行了研究。
跳跃参数可被看做是一个连续时间,连续状态的马尔科夫过程。
利用了李雅普诺夫函数和线性矩阵不等式的新型时滞依赖的随机稳定性判据。
两个数值算例用来说明方法的有效性。
关键词:中立型系统;马尔科夫跳变参数;时变延时;随机稳定Ⅰ.简介在过去的几年中,时滞依赖的稳定性和线性中立型系统的控制十分受到人们的重视。
为了获得保守性更小的时滞依赖条件,人们已经做了很多的努力。
其中用条件保守主义测量方法所得到的一个重要指标就是最大允许的时延上界。
而时滞依赖条件往往是通过以整合重写延时期限的固定模式为基础的李雅普诺夫函数。
然后利用边界技术的交叉项,时滞依赖的相关标准而获得。
根据[4]的分类,有四种基本的固定转换方法。
在这四种固定转换方法中,广义系统变换法是其中最为保守的。
还有一种不同的方法是使用参数模型转化技术和新的矩阵参数。
参数模型转换可以分为两类:一类是矩阵参数可以自由选择的,由此而来的基于线性矩阵不等式(LMI)(参见[2],[18],[19])的稳定条件,另一种是通过一些技术稳定性条件来变换线性矩阵不等式的矩阵变量中的参数(参见[6])。
使用前一种方法并不会导致比广义系统矩阵保守性更小的结果。
mq消费原理MQ (Message Queue) consumption principle is an essential topic in the field of message-oriented middleware technology. Understanding how messages are consumed by applications from a message queue is crucial for developers and software architects working on systems that require asynchronous communication. The consumption process involves retrieving messages from a queue, processing them, and acknowledging their successful processing. This seamless flow of message consumption is key to ensuring the reliability and scalability of distributed systems.理解消息队列(MQ)消费原理对于需要异步通信的系统开发人员和软件架构师来说至关重要。
消费过程涉及从消息队列中检索消息,处理它们,并确认它们的成功处理。
消息消费的无缝流程对于确保分布式系统的可靠性和可扩展性至关重要。
At its core, the MQ consumption principle revolves around the concept of decoupling producers and consumers of messages. By introducing an intermediary— the message queue— between the sender and the receiver of messages, systems achieve loose coupling,enabling independent scalability and fault tolerance. When a message is produced and sent to the message queue, it remains there until a consumer retrieves and processes it, ensuring that the producer and consumer do not need to be active simultaneously.在核心上,MQ消费原理围绕着消息的生产者和消费者解耦的概念。
Unit 10 Program DesignText 1 Computer LanguagesExercises1. Choose the best answer to complete the following sentences.(1)The ( A ) is a language that was represented by long strings of ones and zeroes.A. machine languageB. high-level languageC. low-level languageD. assembly language(2)The ( D ) maps machine instructions to human-readable mnemonics.A. machine languageB. high-level languageC. low-level languageD. assembly language(3)The ( A ) turns the object file into an executable program.A. linkerB. compilerC. interpreterD. computer(4)The ( C ) is a software that translates instructions directly into actions.A. inkerB. compilerC. interpreterD. assembly language2. Fill in the blanks.(1)Computer language include machine language, assembly language and higher-levellanguages(2)Higher-level languages let people work with something approximating words andsentences.(3)Programs use "user-friendly interfaces," involving multiple windows, menus, dialogboxes.3. Translate and analyze the following sentences.(1)Compilers, however, introduce the extra steps of compiling and linking the code,which is inconvenient.句子组成:which引导的是定语从句,修饰steps翻译:但是编译程序却增加了一些额外的步骤来编译和链接代码,相比之下则不方便。
Consumer Group is RebalancingConsumer group rebalancing is a crucial aspect of distributed systems, particularly in the realm of message queuing and event streaming. Inthis article, we will explore what consumer group rebalancing entails, why it is necessary, and how it works.Introduction to Consumer GroupsBefore diving into consumer group rebalancing, let’s first understand what consumer groups are. In message queuing systems like Apache Kafka or RabbitMQ, a consumer group is a logical grouping of consumers that work together to consume messages from one or more topics. Each consumer within a group is responsible for processing a subset of the messages.The primary advantage of using consumer groups is achieving scalability and fault tolerance. By distributing the workload across multiple consumers in a group, we can process messages in parallel and handle failures gracefully. However, maintaining the balance between consumers within a group becomes critical for efficient and reliable message processing.The Need for RebalancingIn dynamic systems where new consumers can join or leave at any time, maintaining an even distribution of workload becomes challenging. Thisis where consumer group rebalancing comes into play. Rebalancing ensures that the load is evenly distributed across all active consumers within a group when changes occur in the group’s membership or topic partitions.There are several scenarios that trigger rebalancing:1. New Consumer JoinsWhen a new consumer joins an existing consumer group, it needs to be assigned a fair share of partitions from the available topics. Without rebalancing, all existing consumers would continue consuming messages while the new consumer remains idle.2. Consumer Leaves or FailsIf a consumer leaves or fails within a group, its assigned partitions need to be redistributed among the remaining active consumers. Thisensures that no partitions are left unprocessed due to the absence of any particular consumer.3. Change in Topic PartitionsIf there are changes in the number of partitions for a particular topic, rebalancing is required to redistribute the workload among the active consumers. This ensures that all partitions are distributed evenly, regardless of the changes in partition count.How Rebalancing WorksConsumer group rebalancing involves a coordinated effort between the consumers and the broker(s) managing the topics. Let’s understand the high-level steps involved in rebalancing:1.Detecting Changes: Consumers periodically communicate with thebroker to check for any changes in group membership or topicpartitions. This can be done through heartbeat messages ormetadata requests.2.Triggering Rebalance: When a change is detected, one of theconsumers acts as a group coordinator and triggers the rebalanceprocess. The coordinator notifies all other consumers about theimpending rebalance.3.Revoking Partitions: Before redistributing partitions, eachconsumer voluntarily revokes its currently assigned partitions.This ensures a clean slate before reassignment.4.Calculating Assignment: The coordinator calculates an optimalassignment plan based on various factors like consumer capacity,partition distribution, and any configured constraints (ifapplicable).5.Assigning Partitions: Once the assignment plan is ready, thecoordinator assigns partitions to each consumer based on theircapabilities and fairness criteria. The goal is to distributeworkload as evenly as possible.6.Propagating Assignments: The coordinator communicates eachconsumer’s newly assigned partitions so that they can startconsuming messages from those partitions.7.Resuming Consumption: Finally, consumers begin consuming messagesfrom their newly assigned partitions, ensuring that load balancing is achieved across all active consumers within the group.It’s worth noting that different m essage queuing systems may implement slight variations in this process, but the core principles remain consistent across most distributed systems.Considerations and ChallengesConsumer group rebalancing introduces some considerations and challenges that need to be addressed:1. Performance ImpactRebalancing can impact the overall performance of the consumer group during the transition phase. It may lead to temporary disruptions in message processing as consumers pause and resume consumption. Careful planning and monitoring are essential to minimize any negative impact on system performance.2. Consumer LagDuring rebalancing, some consumers may be assigned additional partitions, leading to an uneven distribution of workload. This can result in temporary consumer lag until the workload stabilizes. Proper monitoring and load testing can help identify and address such issues.3. Coordinator FailuresIn systems where a single consumer acts as the coordinator, its failure can disrupt the rebalancing process. To mitigate this risk, some systems employ a distributed coordination mechanism where multiple consumers collectively manage the rebalance operation.4. Handling Large Topic PartitionsIf a topic has an excessive number of partitions, it can complicate the rebalancing process due to increased coordination overhead and slower assignment calculations. It’s important to strike a balance between scalability and practicality when deciding on the number of partitionsfor a topic.ConclusionConsumer group rebalancing is an integral part of distributed systems that utilize consumer groups for message processing. It ensures that workload is evenly distributed across all active consumers within a group, enabling scalability and fault tolerance.By understanding why rebalancing is necessary and how it works, we can design robust systems that efficiently handle changes in group membership or topic partitions. Considerations such as performance impact, consumer lag, coordinator failures, and large topic partitions should be carefully addressed to ensure smooth operation of consumer groups.Remember, maintaining balance is key in achieving efficient message processing in distributed systems!。
ai给人类带来的机遇和挑战英语作文The Opportunities and Challenges of AI for HumanityArtificial Intelligence (AI) has been a topic of fascination and debate for decades, as it holds the potential to revolutionize various aspects of our lives. As we delve deeper into the realm of AI, we find ourselves confronted with a myriad of opportunities and challenges that will shape the future of humanity.One of the most promising opportunities presented by AI is its ability to enhance and augment human capabilities. AI-powered systems can perform tasks with unparalleled speed, accuracy, and efficiency, freeing up human time and resources for more complex and creative endeavors. In the field of healthcare, AI-driven diagnostics and personalized treatment plans have the potential to revolutionize the way we approach medical care, leading to earlier detection of diseases and more effective interventions. Similarly, in the realm of scientific research, AI can sift through vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and generate novel hypotheses that could accelerate the pace of discovery and innovation.Furthermore, AI-powered automation has the potential to streamlinevarious industries, reducing the burden of tedious and repetitive tasks. This could lead to increased productivity, cost savings, and the reallocation of human labor towards more fulfilling and meaningful work. Imagine a future where AI-powered robots handle the majority of manual labor, freeing up individuals to pursue their passions, engage in lifelong learning, and contribute to the betterment of society in ways that are uniquely human.Another significant opportunity presented by AI is its ability to enhance our decision-making processes. AI-powered systems can analyze vast amounts of data, identify trends and patterns, and provide insights that can inform our decision-making. This could lead to more informed and data-driven decisions in areas such as public policy, finance, and resource allocation, ultimately leading to more efficient and equitable outcomes for society.However, the rise of AI also presents a number of challenges that must be addressed. One of the primary concerns is the potential displacement of human workers due to automation. As AI-powered systems become more capable and efficient, there is a risk that certain job roles may become obsolete, leading to widespread unemployment and economic disruption. This challenge will require a comprehensive approach to workforce retraining, education, and the creation of new job opportunities that leverage the unique capabilities of both humans and AI.Another significant challenge is the ethical and societal implications of AI. As AI systems become more advanced and integrated into our daily lives, questions arise around issues such as privacy, data security, algorithmic bias, and the potential for AI to be used for malicious purposes. Addressing these challenges will require the development of robust ethical frameworks, transparent and accountable AI governance, and the active involvement of diverse stakeholders to ensure that the benefits of AI are equitably distributed.Additionally, the development and deployment of AI systems must be accompanied by a deep understanding of the potential risks and unintended consequences. AI systems, if not designed and implemented with great care, could lead to catastrophic outcomes, such as the amplification of existing biases, the erosion of human agency, and the potential for AI systems to spiral out of control. Mitigating these risks will require ongoing research, rigorous testing, and the development of safety protocols to ensure that AI systems remain aligned with human values and priorities.In conclusion, the emergence of AI presents both tremendous opportunities and significant challenges for humanity. As we navigate this rapidly evolving landscape, it is crucial that we approach the development and deployment of AI with a balancedand thoughtful approach. By harnessing the power of AI to enhance human capabilities, while addressing the ethical and societal implications, we can unlock a future where AI and humans work in harmony to create a better world for all.。
Towards Robust Distribut ed Sy stems Inktomi at a GlanceCompany Overview“INKT” on NASDAQFounded 1996 out of UCBerkeley~700 EmployeesApplicationsSearch TechnologyNetwork ProductsOnline ShoppingWireless SystemsOur PerspectiveInktomi builds twodistributed systems:–Global Search Engines–Distributed Web Caches Based on scalablecluster & parallelcomputing technology But very little use of classic DS research...“Distributed Systems” don’t work...There exist working DS:–Simple protocols: DNS, WWW–Inktomi search, Content Delivery Networks–Napster, Verisign, AOLBut these are not classic DS:–Not distributed objects–No RPC–No modularity–Complex ones are single owner (except phones)Three Basic IssuesWhere is the state? Consistency vs. Availability Understanding BoundariesWhere’s the state?(not all locations are equal)PODC Keynote, July 19, 2000Santa Clara Cluster•Very uniform •No monitors •No people •No cables •Working power •Working A/C •Working BWDelivering High AvailabilityWe kept up the service through: Crashes & disk failures (weekly) Database upgrades (daily)Software upgrades (weekly to monthly) OS upgrades (twice) Power outage (several)Network outages (now have 11 connections) Physical move of all equipment (twice)Persistent State is HARDClassic DS focus on the computation, not the data –this is WRONG, computation is the easy partData centers exist for a reason–can’t have consistency or availability without themOther locations are for caching only:–proxies, basestations, set-top boxes, desktops–phones, PDAs, …Distributed systems can’t ignore location distinctionsAPActive Proxy:Bootstraps thin devicesinto infrastructure, runsmobile codeAPWorkstations & PCs Berkeley Ninja ArchitectureBase:Scalable, highly-available platform forpersistent-state servicesInternetPDAsConsistency vs. Availability(ACID vs. BASE)ACID vs. BASEDBMS research is about ACID (mostly)But we forfeit “C” and “I” for availability, graceful degradation, and performanceThis tradeoff is fundamental.BASE:–B asically A vailable–S oft-state–E ventual consistencyACID vs. BASEACIDStrong consistency IsolationFocus on “commit” Nested transactions Availability?Conservative(pessimistic)Difficult evolution(e.g. schema)BASEWeak consistency–stale data OKAvailability firstBest effortApproximate answers OK Aggressive (optimistic)Simpler!FasterEasier evolutionBut I think it’s a spectrum The CAP TheoremC onsistency A vailabilityTolerance to networkP artitionsTheorem: You can have atmost two of these propertiesfor any shared-data systemForfeit PartitionsC onsistency A vailabilityTolerance to networkP artitionsExamplesSingle-site databasesCluster databasesLDAPxFS file systemTraits2-phase commitcache validationprotocolsForfeit AvailabilityC onsistency A vailabilityTolerance to networkP artitionsExamplesDistributed databasesDistributed lockingMajority protocolsTraitsPessimistic lockingMake minoritypartitions unavailableForfeit ConsistencyC onsistency A vailabilityTolerance to networkP artitionsExamplesCodaWeb cachingeDNSTraitsexpirations/leasesconflict resolutionoptimisticThese Tradeoffs are RealThe whole space is usefulReal internet systems are a careful mixture ofACID and BASE subsystems–We use ACID for user profiles and logging (for revenue)But there is almost no work in this areaSymptom of a deeper problem: systems anddatabase communities are separate butoverlapping (with distinct vocabulary)CAP Take HomesCan have consistency & availability within acluster (foundation of Ninja), but it is still hard in practiceOS/Networking good at BASE/Availability, but terrible at consistencyDatabases better at C than AvailabilityWide-area databases can’t have bothDisconnected clients can’t have bothAll systems are probabilistic…Understanding Boundaries (the RPC hangover)The BoundaryThe interface between two modules –client/server, peers, libaries , etc… Basic boundary = the procedure call–thread traverses the boundary–two sides are in the same address spaceCSDifferent Address SpacesWhat if the two sides are NOT in the sameaddress space?–IPC or LRPCCan’t do pass -by -reference (pointers)–Most IPC screws this up: pass by value -result –There are TWO copies of args not one What if they share some memory?–Can pass pointers, but…–Need synchronization between client/server –Not all pointers can be passedTrust the other side?What if we don’t trust the other side? Have to check args , no pointer passing Kernels get this right:–copy/check args–use opaque references (e.g. File Descriptors) Most systems do not:–TCP –Napster–web browsersPartial FailureCan the two sides fail independently?–RPC, IPC, LRPC Can’t be transparent (like RPC) !! New exceptions (other side gone) Reclaim local resources– e.g. kernels leak sockets over time => reboot Can use leases?–Different new exceptions: lease expired RPC tries to hide these issues (but fails)Multiplexing clients?Does the server have to:–deal with high concurrency?–Say “no” sometimes (graceful degradation)–Treat clients equally (fairness)–Bill for resources (and have audit trail)–Isolate clients performance, data, ….These all affect the boundary definition Boundary evolution?Can the two sides be updated independently?(NO)The DLL problem...Boundaries need versionsNegotiation protocol for upgrade?Promises of backward compatibility?Affects naming too (version number)Example: protocols vs. APIsProtocols have been more successful the APIsSome reasons:–protocols are pass by value–protocols designed for partial failure–not trying to look like local procedure calls–explicit state machine, rather than call/return(this exposes exceptions well)Protocols still not good at trust, billing, evolution Example: XMLXML doesn’t solve any of these issuesIt is RPC with an extensible type systemIt makes evolution better?–two sides need to agree on schema–can ignore stuff you don’t understandCan mislead us to ignore the real issuesBoundary SummaryWe have been very sloppy about boundariesLeads to fragile systemsRoot cause is false transparency: trying to look like local procedure callsRelatively little work in evolution, federation, client-based resource allocation, failure recovery ConclusionsClassic Distributed Systems are fragileSome of the causes:–focus on computation, not data–ignoring location distinctions–poor definitions of consistency/availability goals–poor understanding of boundaries (RPC in particular) These are all fixable, but need to be far more commonThe DQ PrincipleD ata/query * Q ueries/sec = constant = DQ–for a given node–for a given app/OS releaseA fault can reduce the capacity (Q), completeness(D)or bothFaults reduce this constant linearly (at best)Harvest & YieldYield: Fraction of Answered Queries–Related to uptime but measured by queries, not by time–Drop 1 out of 10 connections => 90% yield–At full utilization: yield ~ capacity ~ QHarvest: Fraction of the Complete Result–Reflects that some of the data may be missing due to faults –Replication: maintain D under faultsDQ corollary:harvest * yield ~ constant–ACID => choose 100% harvest (reduce Q but 100% D)–Internet => choose 100% yield (available but reduced D)Harvest Options1)Ignore lost nodes–RPC gives up–forfeit small part of the database–reduce D, keep Q2)Pair up nodes–RPC tries alternate–survives one fault per pair survives one fault per pair –reduce Q, keep D3)n-member replica groups Decide when you care...RAID RAIDReplica GroupsWith n members:Each fault reduces Q by 1/nD stable until nth faultAdded load is 1/(n-1) per fault–n=2 => double load or 50% capacity–n=4 => 133% load or 75% capacity–“load redirection problem”Disaster tolerance: better have >3 mirrorsGraceful DegradationGoal: smooth decrease in harvest/yield proportional to faults–we know DQ drops linearlySaturation will occur–high peak/average ratios...–must reduce harvest or yield (or both)–must do admission controlOne answer: reduce D dynamically–disaster => redirect load, then reduce D todisaster => redirect load, then reduce D tocompensate for extra load Thinking ProbabilisticallyMaximize symmetry–SPMD + simple replication schemesMake faults independent–requires thought–avoid cascading errors/faults–understand redirected load–KISSUse randomness–makes worst-case and average case the same–ex: Inktomi spreads data & queries randomly–Node loss implies a random 1% harvest reductionServer PollutionCan’t fix all memory leaksThird-party software leaks memory and sockets –so does the OS sometimesSome failures tie up local resources Solution: planned periodic “bounce”–Not worth the stress to do any better–Bounce time is less than 10 seconds–Nice to remove load first…EvolutionThree Approaches:Flash Upgrade–Fast reboot into new version–Focus on MTTR (< 10 sec)–Reduces yield (and uptime)Rolling Upgrade–Upgrade nodes one at time in a “wave”–Temporary 1/n harvest reduction, 100% yield–Requires co-existing versions“Big Flip”The Big FlipSteps:1)take down 1/2 the nodes1) take down 1/2 the nodes2)upgrade that half2) upgrade that half3)flip the “active half” (site upgraded)3) flip the “active half” (site upgraded)4)upgrade second half4) upgrade second half5)return to 100%5) return to 100%50% Harvest, 100% Yield–or inverse?No mixed versions–can replace schema, protocols, ...Twice used to change physical location Key New ProblemsUnknown but large growth–Incremental & Absolute scalability–1000’s of componentsMust be truly highly available–Hot swap everything (no recovery time allowed)–No “night”–Graceful degradation under faults & saturation Constant evolution (internet time)–Software will be buggy–Hardware will fail–These can’t be emergencies...ConclusionsParallel Programming is very relevant, except…–historically avoids availability–no notion of online evolution–limited notions of graceful degradation (checkpointing)–best for CPU-bound tasksMust think probabilistically about everything –no such thing as a 100% working system–no such thing as 100% fault tolerance–partial results are often OK (and better than none)–Capacity * Completeness == Constant ConclusionsWinning solution is message-passing clusters –fine-grain communication =>fine-grain exception handling–don’t want every load/store to deal with partial failure Key open problems:–libraries & data structures for HA shared state–support for replication and partial failure–better understanding of probabilistic systems–cleaner support for exceptions (graceful degradation)–support for split-phase I/O and many concurrent threads –support for 10,000 threads/node (to avoid FSMs)Backup slides New Hard Problems...Really need to manage disks well–problems are I/O bound, not CPU bound Lots of simultaneous connections–50Kb/s => at least 2000 connections/node HAS to be highly available–no maintenance window, even for upgrades Continuous evolution–constant site changes, always small bugs...–large but unpredictable traffic growth Graceful degradation under saturationParallel Disk I/OWant 50+ outstanding reads/disk–Provides disk-head scheduler with many choices–Trades response time for throughputPushes towards a split-phase approach to disksGeneral trend: each query is a finite-state machine –split-phase disk/network operations are state transitions–multiplex many FSMs over small number of threads–FSM handles state rather than thread stack。