AS9103

L o g o专业/科学/务实AS9100D (2016)航空、航天和防卫组织质量管理体系要求主讲：朱雅云AS9100产生背景AS9100产生背景AS9100产生背景AS9100产生背景AS9100推行意义AS9100的认证是企业进入航空航天行业的通行证，尤其是美国波音公司、法国的空客和目前中国的大飞机计划均需要供应商获得AS9100的认证搞门砖AS9100的认证同时是帮助企业提高管理水平的有效途径。

即使企业不生产航空航天产品也可以获得认证。

推进器AS9100推行意义已经有ISO9001，为什么还要针对航空航天行业的质量管理体系标准？针对性不足ISO9001适用于所有行业，针对性不足，因此，现在ISO9001已发展出IATF16949、ISO13485、AS9100等AS9100的发展历程AS9100标准草案AS9100标准正式版本AS/EN9100标准最终草案AS9100标准正式版本IAQS9100：2001最终草案1995年SAE航空航天部开始航空航天质量标准的准备工作，并于1996年10月第一次发布AS9000标准草案1997年5月SAE发布AS9000标准正式版本《航空航天基本质量体系》1999年6月IAQG/SAE/AECMA共同发布国际航空航天质量标准AS/EN9100标准最终草案1999年11月SAE以ISO9001：1994为基础正式发布AS9100标准正式版本《航空航天质量体系——设计、开发、生产、安装和服务的质量保证模式》2001年3月26日IAQG发布国际航空航天质量标准（IAQS）9100：2001的最终草案AS9100的发展历程ISO9001：1987诞生ISO9001：1994战术性换版ISO9001：2000战略性换版ISO9001：2008编辑性修正ISO9001：2015里程碑换版AS9100A ：2001AS9100B ：2004AS9100C ：2009AS9100D ：2016美国航空航天质量AAQG欧洲航空航天质量EAQG亚太航空航天质量协调组织APAQGAS9100D转换计划2016年10月2017年6月2018年9月AS9100D发布AS9100C不在认证AS9100C证书失效123AS9100系列标准标准号名称9100航空航天质量体系标准9101质量管理体系9102航空航天首件检验要求9103关键特性波动管理0.1 总则采用质量管理体系是组织的一项战略决策，能够帮助其提高整体绩效，为推动可持续发展奠定良好基础。

AEROSPACE STANDARD(R) Aerospace First Article Inspection Requirement®AS9102Technically equivalent to AECMA prEN 9102REV. AFOREWORDIn December 1998, the Aerospace Industry had established the International Aerospace QualityGroup (IAQG) with the purpose of achieving significant improvements in quality and reductionsin cost throughout the value stream.This organization, with representation from Aerospace companies in Americas, Asia and Europeand sponsored by SAE, SJAC, and AECMA has agreed to take responsibility for the technical contents of this standard. TABLE OF CONTENTS1. INTRODUCTION.......................................……….............. ..31.1 Scope (3)1.2 Pu rpose (3)1.3 Convention (3)2. REFERENCES (3)3. DEFINITIONS (4)4. APPLICABILITY (5)5. REQUIREMENTS (5)5.1 Par t Requirements (5)5.2 Evaluation Activities (6)5.3 Partial or Re-accomplishment of First Article Inspection (6)5.4 Nonconformance Handling (7)5.5 Documentation (7)5.5.1 Forms (7)5.5.2 Characteristic Accountability (8)5.5.3 Record of Results (8)5.6 Control of Records (8)6. NOTES (9)APPENDIX A FORMS AND GUIDELINES TO COMPLETE THE FORMS ..101. INTRODUCTION:1.1 Scope:This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes requirements for performing anddocumenting the First Article Inspection (FAI).1.2 Purpose:The purpose of the First Article Inspection is to give objective evidence that allengineering, design and specification requirements are correctly understood, accounted for, verified, and recorded. The purpose of this standard is to provide a consistent documentation requirement for aerospace components FAI.1.3 Convention:The following convention is used in this Standard.• The words .shall. and .must. indicate mandatory requirements.• The word .should. indicates mandatory requirements with some flexibility allowed incompliance methodology. An Organization is permitted to show that its approach meets the intent of the requirement and this standard. 航空标准航空首件检查要求版本：A前言1998年12月，航空工业成立的国际航空质量部门（IAQG），目的是为了提高质量和降低成本。

AEROSPACE STANDARDAS9103 Issued 2001-10Variation Management of Key Characteristics關鍵特性變動管理FOREWORD 序言In December1998,the Aerospace Industry had established the International Aerospace Quality Group(IAQ G)with the purpose of achieving significant improvements in quality and reductions in cost throughout the value stream.1998年12月，航空航天工業建立了國際航空航天質量集團（IAQG），目的是在整個價值流中實現質量的顯著提高和成本的降低。

This organization,with representation from Aerospace companies in Americas,Asia and Europe and sponso red by SAE,SJAC,and AECMA has agreed to take responsibility for the technical contents of this standard.該組織由美國，亞洲和歐洲的航空航天公司代表，SAE，SJAC和AECMA贊助，同意對本標準的技術內容負責。

INTRODUCTION 介紹This Aerospace Standard establishes variation management requirements for Key Characteristics.The Stan dard also specifies general requirements and provides a process to achieve those requirements.The Standar d requires a thorough assessment of the part production process with the primary goals being to control an d minimize variation in characteristics being produced by this process.該航空航天標準確定了關鍵特性的變更管理要求。

波音对供应商质量管理体系的要求范艳清译江元英译者注：保持产品和过程稳定的、长久的改进是波音公司战略发展的基础。

确保顾客满意和提高股东价值是波音公司及其供应商共同的目的。

为了达到这一目的，波音公司及其供应商共同努力提高其设计、制造、管理的效率。

以下是波音供应商质量管理体系要求文件（D6-82479），该文件规定了波音公司对其供应商质量体系的要求，并用两个附件和两个附录描述了体系的详细要求。

文件编号：D6-82479 发行版本：D 发行日期：2007.01.30 目录 1.0 范围.........................................................................................................................1 2.0 波音公司对已通过航空航天质量管理体系（AQMS）认证的认可.................2 附件A：质量管理体系——9100.................................................................................3 附件B：检验和试验质量体系.....................................................................................4 附录1：关键特性波动管理（9103＊＊）.................................................................4 1. 范围...................................................................................................................4 2. 符合性评估.......................................................................................................4 关键特性波动管理..........................................................................................4 附录2：可交付软件的质量体系要求.........................................................................5 1. 结构和使用.......................................................................................................5 2. 第一部分——对AS9100A质量管理体系中可交付航空航天软件的补充——航空航天——软件要求（AS9100A 中基于ISO9001：2000的补充，第一部分）.................................................................................................................................5 3. 第二部分——对AS/EN/JISQ9100＊质量管理体系中可交付航空航天软件的补充——能力成熟度模型（CMMI）.................................................................5 11.0 范围本文件规定了波音公司对其供应商质量管理体系的要求，并用两个附件和两个附录描述了体系的详细要求，分别见附件A、B和附录1、2，具体使用应在合同中约定。

AEROSPACE STANDARDSAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user.” SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be reaffirmed, revised, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions. Copyright © 2004 SAE InternationalAll rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE.TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER:Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada)Tel: 724-776-4970 (outside USA) Issued 2000-08 Revise d 2004-01 Supersedes AS90125.5 Documentation (7)5.5.1 Forms (7)Accountability (8)5.5.2 Characteristic5.5.3 Record of Results (8)5.6 Control of Records (8)6. NOTES (9)APPENDIX A FORMS AND GUIDELINES TO COMPLETE THE FORMS (10)1. INTRODUCTION:1.1 Scope:This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes requirements for performing anddocumenting the First Article Inspection (FAI).1.2 Purpose:The purpose of the First Article Inspection is to give objective evidence that allengineering, design and specification requirements are correctly understood, accounted for, verified, and recorded. The purpose of this standard is to provide a consistentdocumentation requirement for aerospace components FAI.1.3 Convention:The following convention is used in this Standard.• The words “shall” and “must” indicate mandatory requirements.• The word “should” indicates mandatory requirements with some flexibility allowed in compliance methodology. An Organization is permitted to show that its approachmeets the intent of the requirement and this standard.• Words “typical”, “example” or “e.g.” show suggestions given for guidance only.• “Notes” are used for additional clarification.2. REFERENCES:1. International Aerospace Standard 9100 “Quality Systems - Aerospace - Model forQuality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing”.2. International Aerospace Standard 9103 “Variation Management in Key Characteristics”.3. International Aerospace Standard 9131 “Quality Systems - NonconformanceDocumentation”.3. DEFINITIONS:ATTRIBUTE DATA: A result from a characteristic or property that is appraised only as to whether it does or does not conform to a given requirement (for example, go/no-go,accept/reject, pass/fail, etc.).DELIVERABLE SOFTWARE: Embedded or loadable airborne, space borne or ground support software components that are part of an aircraft Type Design, weapon system, missile or spacecraft.DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS: Those dimensional, visual, functional, mechanical, and material features or properties, which describe and constitute the design of the article as specified by Drawing Requirements. These characteristics can be measured, inspected, tested, or verified to determine conformance to the design requirements. Dimensionalfeatures include in-process locating features such as target-machined (or forged/cast)dimensions on forgings and castings, and, weld/braze joint preparation necessary foracceptance of finished joint. Material features or properties may include processingvariables and sequences, which are specified by the drawing (e.g., heat treat temperature, fluorescent penetrant class, ultrasonic scans, sequence of welding and heat treat). These provide assurance of intended characteristics that could not be otherwise defined.DRAWING REQUIREMENTS: Requirements of the drawing (including Parts Lists),specification, or purchasing document to which the article is to be made. These include any notes, specifications, and lower-level drawings invoked.FIRST ARTICLE INSPECTION (FAI): A complete, independent, and documented physical and functional inspection process to verify that prescribed production methods haveproduced an acceptable item as specified by engineering drawings, planning, purchase order, engineering specifications, and/or other applicable design documents.FIRST ARTICLE INSPECTION REPORT (FAIR): The forms and package of documentation for a part number or assembly, including FAI results, as per this Standard.FIRST PRODUCTION RUN PARTS: The first group of one or more parts that are the result of a planned process designed to be used for future production of these same parts.Prototype parts, or parts built using methods different from those intended for the normal production process, shall not be considered as part of the first production run.MULTIPLE CHARACTERISTICS: Identical characteristics that occur at more than one location (e.g., “4 Places”) but are established by a single set of drawing requirements (e.g., rivet hole size, dovetail slots, corner radii, chemical milling pocket thickness).PRODUCT: The result of a process, which in the context of this Standard includes finished detailed parts and assemblies. It also includes forgings and castings.3. (Continued):REFERENCE CHARACTERISTICS: The characteristics that are used for “information only”or to show relationship. These are dimensions without tolerances and refer to otherdimensions on the drawing.STANDARD CATALOG HARDWARE: A part or material that conforms to an established industry or national authority published specification, having all characteristics identified by text description, National/Military Standard Drawing, or catalog item.VARIABLES DATA: Quantitative measurements taken on a continuous scale. For example, the diameter of a cylinder or the gap between mating parts.4. APPLICABILITY:This Aerospace Standard applies to assemblies sub-assemblies, and detail parts including castings and forgings. This Standard applies to organizations that are responsible forproducing the design characteristics of the product. The Organization shall flow down the requirements of this Standard to Suppliers who produce Design Characteristics.This Standard does not apply to procured Standard Catalog Hardware or DeliverableSoftware.5. REQUIREMENTS:5.1 Part Requirements:The Organization shall perform FAI on new Product representative of the First Production Run.NOTE: For assemblies, the assembly level FAI shall be performed on thosecharacteristics specified on the assembly drawing.NOTE: The Organization shall not use prototype parts, or parts manufactured using methods different from those intended for the normal production process, for theFAI. This Standard may be used to verify conformance of a prototype part todesign requirements.5.2 Evaluation Activities:The Organization should conduct the following activities in support of FAI.1. Review documentation for the manufacturing process (e.g., routing sheets,manufacturing/quality plans, manufacturing work instructions, etc.) to make sure alloperations are complete as planned.2. Review referenced exhibits supporting the FAI (e.g., inspection data, test data,Acceptance Test Procedures, etc.) for completeness.3. Review nonconformance documentation (if any), for completeness.NOTE: International Aerospace Standard 9131 may be used as a guidance.4. Review material certifications for compliance, as applicable.5. Verify that approved Special Process sources are used (as applicable), and that themanufacturing planning/routing document calls out the correct specification.6. Verify that Key Characteristic requirements have been met, as applicable (seeInternational Aerospace Standard 9103 for guidance).7. Verify part specific gages and/or tooling are qualified and traceable, as applicable.8. Verify that every design characteristic requirement is accounted for, uniquely identifiedand has inspection results traceable to each unique identifier.5.3 Partial or Re-accomplishment of First Article Inspection:The FAI requirement, once invoked, shall continue to apply even after initial compliance.The FAI requirements may be satisfied by a partial FAI that addresses differencesbetween the current configuration and prior approved configurations. When a partial FAI is performed, the Organization shall complete only the affected fields in the FAI forms.FAI requirements may also be satisfied by previously approved FAI performed on identical characteristics of similar parts produced by identical means. When FAI requirements(partial or complete) are satisfied in this manner, identify the approved configuration in the index of part numbers on Form 1.5.3 (Continued):The Organization shall perform a full FAI, or a partial FAI for affected characteristics, when any of the following events occurs:1. A change in the design affecting fit, form or function of the part.2. A change in manufacturing source(s), process(es), inspection method(s), location ofmanufacture, tooling or materials, that can potentially affect fit, form or function.3. A change in numerical control program or translation to another media that canpotentially affect fit, form or function.4. A natural or man-made event, which may adversely affect the manufacturing process.5. A lapse in production for two years or as specified by the Customer.5.4 Nonconformance Handling:The FAI is not complete until the Organization closes all non-conformances affecting the part and implements corrective actions. The Organization shall re-do an FAI for thoseaffected characteristics and shall record the results.5.5 Documentation:5.5.1 Forms: The Appendix of this Standard contains forms that comply with thedocumentation requirements of this Standard. Each field in the forms is designated witha unique reference number. Each field is also identified as:• (R) Required: This is mandatory information.• (CR) Conditionally Required: This field must be completed when applicable (i.e., when there exists a Customer requirement, then this field must be filled in).• (O) Optional: This field is provided for convenience.Forms contained in the Appendix should be used to document the results of the FAI.NOTE: The fields in the forms are color-coded for convenience. Use of black-and-white forms is acceptable.Forms other than those contained in the Appendix may be used, however they mustcontain all “Required” and “Conditionally Required” information and have the same field reference numbers.5.5.1 (Continued):All forms shall be completed either electronically or in permanent ink.All forms shall be completed in English or in a language specified by the Customer.NOTE: Continuation sheets using the same form are acceptable or insert additional rows if completing electronically.5.5.2 Characteristic Accountability: The Organization shall verify every Design Characteristicduring FAI and record the results. Every Design Characteristic shall have its own unique characteristic number.NOTE: Reference characteristics may be omitted from the FAI.NOTE: Use more than one line if needed for any characteristic.NOTE: Characteristics not measurable in the final product shall be verified during the manufacturing process (as long as they are not affected by subsequentoperations) or by destructive means. Characteristics verified at the detail levelmay be referenced in the assembly-level FAIR.5.5.3 Record of Results: Results from inspection of design characteristics shall be expressedin quantitative terms (Variables Data) when a Design Characteristic is expressed bynumerical limits.The Organization shall record the results in the units specified on the drawing orspecification, unless otherwise approved by the Customer.Attribute Data (e.g., go/no-go) may be used if no inspection technique resulting inVariables Data is feasible. Attribute Data is permitted when the Design Characteristicdoes not specify numerical limits (e.g., break all sharp edges). It is also permitted where qualified tooling is consistently used as a check feature and a go/no-go feature has been established for the specific characteristic.5.6 Control of Records:All FAI documentation required by this Standard shall be considered as a quality record and the Organization shall retain it according to Customer or regulatory requirements.6. NOTES:6.1 The change bar ( l ) located in the left margin is for the convenience of the user in locatingareas where technical revisions, not editorial changes, have been made to the previous issue of this document. An (R) symbol to the left of the document title indicates acomplete revision of the document.PREPARED UNDER THE JURISDICTION OFSAE COMMITTEE G-14, AMERICAS AEROSPACE QUALITY GROUP (AAQG)APPENDIX AFORMS AND GUIDELINES TO COMPLETE THE FORMSThis Appendix provides the guidelines to complete the forms. Each input field is identified as:This is mandatory information.This field is shown in Bold font.• (R) Required:• (CR) Conditionally Required: This field must be completed when applicable. This field is shown in Bold Italic font.• (O) Optional: This field is provided for convenience. It is shown in Regular font.The fields are also color coded for visual convenience: (R) as yellow and (CR) as blue. Use of black-and-white forms is acceptable.Instructions to Complete Form 1: Part Number AccountabilityThis form is used to identify the part that is being first-article inspected (FAI part) and associated subassemblies or detail parts.NOTE: Fields 1-4 are repeated on all forms for convenience and traceability.1) (R) P art Number: Number of the part (FAI part).P art Name: Name of the part as shown on the drawing.2) (R)number:Serial number of the part.3) (CR) Serial4) (O) FAI Report Number: Reference number that identifies the FAI. This may be aninternal report number.5) (CR) Part Revision Level: Latest part revision that affects the part being first articleinspected. If there is no revision, indicate as such. Note: The latest drawingrevision (Field 7) does not always affect all parts contained on a drawing.6) (CR)Drawing Number: Drawing number associated with the FAI part.7) (CR) Drawing Revision Level:The revision level of the engineering drawing. If thereis no revision, indicate as such.8) (CR) Additional Changes: Provide reference number(s) of any changes that areincorporated in the product but not reflected in referenced drawing/part revisionlevel (e.g., change in design, engineering changes, manufacturing changes,deviation or exclusion from certain drawing requirement, etc.).9) (R) Manufacturing Process Reference: A reference number that providestraceability to the manufacturing record of the FAI part (e.g., router number,manufacturing plan number, etc.)10) (R) Organization Name: Name of the Organization performing this FAI.11) (O) Supplier Code: Supplier Code is a unique number given by Customer to theOrganization. It is sometimes referred to as Vendor Code, Vendor IdentificationNumber, Supplier Number, etc.12) (O) P.O. Number: Enter Customer Purchase Order number, if applicable or required.13) (R) D etail part or an Assembly FAI: Check as appropriate .14) (R) Full FAI or Partial FAI: Check as appropriate. For a partial FAI, provide thebaseline part number (including revision level) to which this partial FAI is performedand the reason for it. For example, changes in design, process, manufacturinglocation, etc.15, 16, 17 and 18: This section is required only if the part number in Field 1 is an assembly requiring lower level parts to be installed into the assembly.15) (CR) Part Number: Detail or next level sub-assembly part number to be included in theassembly.16) (CR) Part Name , as shown on the drawing.17) (CR) Part Serial Number of the part that is installed in the assembly, when applicable.18) (O) FAI Report Number for detail part.19) (R) Signature: Name and signature of the person who prepared FAI Form 1. Alsocheck appropriate box if this FAI is complete per 5.4.Note: The signature on this form certifies the following two things:1) that all characteristics are accounted for; meet drawing requirements or areproperly documented for disposition.2) if this FAI is complete per 5.4. Check as appropriate.20) (R) Date when this FAI Form 1 was prepared.21) (O) Name of the person from the Organization who approved FAI report22) (O) Date when the FAI report is approved.23) (O) Customer Approval. This field is used by Customer to record approval, if required.24) (O) Date Customer approved this FAI form.Instructions to Complete Form 2: Product Accountability – Raw Material, Specifications and Special process(s), Functional TestingThis form is used if any material, special processes or functional testing are defined as a Design Requirement.NOTE: Fields 1-4 are repeated on all forms for convenience and traceability.1) (R) P art Number: Number of the part (FAI part).2) (R) P art Name: Name of the part as shown on the drawing.3) (CR) Part serial number: Serial number of the part.4) (O) FAI Report Number: Reference number that identifies the FAI. This may be aninternal report number5) (CR) Material or Process:Enter the name of material or process.6) (CR) Specification:Enter material or process specifications number (include permittedalternates, if used), class, and material form (e.g., sheet, bar, etc.). Include all“Make From” materials that are incorporated into the FAI part. For raw materials,include all materials that are incorporated into the FAI part, (e.g., weld/braze fillermaterials, balls for ball brazing, etc.), and Standard Catalog hardware (e.g., AN,MS fasteners); but do not include processing materials such as acid etchants.7) (O) Code: Enter any required code from the Customer for material or process listing,when required.8) (CR) Special Process Supplier Code: Customer given Supplier code of theorganization performing special process(es) or supplying material, as applicable.Also add, Special process supplier name and address.9) (CR) Customer Approval Verification: Indicate if the special process or materialsource is approved by the Customer. Write NA if Customer approval is notrequired.10) (CR) Certificate of Conformance number: Number of the certificate (e.g., specialprocess completion certification, raw material test report number, Standard Cataloghardware compliance report number, traceability number).11) (CR) Functional Test Procedure Number: Functional Test Procedure called out asDesign Requirement.12) (CR) Acceptance Report Number: The functional test certification indicating that testrequirements have been met.13) (O) C omments: As applicable.14) (R) P repared By: Name of the person who prepared this form.15) (R) D ate: Date when this form was completed.Instructions to Complete Form 3: Characteristic Accountability, Verification and Compatibility EvaluationNOTE: Fields 1-4 are repeated on all forms for convenience and traceability.1) (R) P art Number: Number of the part (FAI part).2) (R) P art Name: Name of the part as shown on the drawing.3) (CR) Part serial number: Serial number of part.4) (O) FAI Report Number: Reference number that identifies the FAI. This may be aninternal report number.5) (R) Characteristic Number: Unique assigned number for each Design Characteristic.6) (CR) ReferenceLocation: Location of the Design Characteristic (e.g., drawing zone (page number and section), specification, etc.)7) (CR) Characteristic Designator: If applicable, record characteristic type (e.g., key,flight safety, critical, major, etc.).8) (R) Requirement: Specified requirement for the Design Characteristic (e.g., drawingdimensional characteristics with nominal and tolerances included, drawing notes,specification requirements, etc.).9) (R) Results: List measurement(s) obtained for the Design Characteristics.• For Multiple Characteristics list each characteristic as individual values or list once with the minimum and maximum of measured values attained. If acharacteristic is found to be non-conforming then that characteristic must belisted separately with the measured value noted.• If a Design Requirement requires verification testing, then the actual results will be recorded on the form. If a laboratory report or certificate of test is includedin the FAIR, then these results need not be written on the form, record thereference number in this field. The laboratory report or certificate of test mustshow specific values for requirements and actual results.• For metallurgical characteristics with visual verification requirement that are rated against standard photographs, list the photo number of the closestcomparison. A statement of conformance is acceptable (record the referencenumber in this field).• For processes that require verification per Design Characteristic, include statement of compliance (e.g., certification of compliance, verification indicatorsuch as “accept”, etc.).• For part marking, ensure that marking is legible, correct in content and size and properly located, per applicable specification.10) (CR) Designed Tooling: If a specially designed tooling (including NC programming) isused as a media of inspection, record the tool identification number.11) (CR) Non-Conformance Number: Record a non-conformance document referencenumber if the characteristic is found to be non-conforming.12) (R) P repared By: Name of the person who prepared this form.13) (R) D ate: Date when this form was completed.14) (O) This field area is reserved for optional fields. Add additional columns as requiredby the Organization or Customer.Reason for Partial FAI:。

[修订]AS9100C 标准内审员培训课程试卷AS9100C 标准内审员培训课程试卷单位(部门): 姓名: 职务: 分数:一、单选题(每题一分，共 20 分)1、以下说法哪一个是错误的，并将其编号写在括号里 ( ): A. AS9100C 是IAQG 组织起草并批准发布的国际航空航天和国防组织质量管理体系标准，可用于认证的目的;B. AS9100C 经过五次换版，采用A+B 的编写形式，在ISO9001:2008 的基础上增加了对航空航天和国防组织质量管理体系的特殊要求;C. AS9100C 的适用范围由航空航天组织扩展到所有国防工业组织;D. IAQG 组织的成员主要是由欧美国家航空航天界的特大型集团公司组成。

2、以下说法哪一个是正确的，并将其编号写在括号里( ): A. 全世界质量管理经历了四个阶段，从20 世纪70 年代以后进入了“系统管理和行业扩展”阶段;B. 英国标准化组织 1987 年发布的BS5750 标准，是世界上第一个宇航组织的质量管理体系认证标准;C. IAQG 建议从2010 年4 月1 日开始到2011 年7 月1 日，所有审核均按AS9100C 标准进行;D. 质量分为产品质量、系统质量、质量管理体系等三个层次。

3、以下说法哪一个是错误的，并将其编号写在括号里( ): A. 过程质量取决于质量管理体系的适宜性、符合性和有效性; B. 过程质量从某种意义说，也就是过程能力满足要求的程度; C. 过程的三要素是输入、输出和活动;D. 要求就是明示的要求、隐含的要求和必须的要求;4、以下说法哪一个是正确的，并将其编号写在括号里( ): A. AS9100 系列标准由六个标准组成;B. AS9100 系列标准由七个标准组成;C. AS9100 系列标准由五个标准组成;D. AS9100 系列标准由八个标准组成;5、以下说法哪一个是正确的，并将其编号写在括号里( ): A. AS9120 是宇航和国防组织的质量管理体系评价标准; B. 首件检验标准是 AS9103;C. 关键特性波动管理标准是 AS9101;D. AS9110 是对宇航和国防产品维修组织的质量管理体系要求 6、以下说法哪一个是错误的，并将其编号写在括号里( ): A. 质量管理八项原则是全世界质量管理论和实践经验的总结，是质量管理最基本、最通用的普遍性规律;B. 以顾客为关注焦点的完整解释是:组织依存于顾客，因此组织应当理解顾客当前和未来的需求;C. 采用质量管理体系是组织的一项战略性决策;D. IS9000 系列标准中全面贯彻了“过程方法”的质量管理原则; 7、ISO9001:2008 标准中以下那个条款最集中、最全面、最系统的体现了应用过程方法建立质量管理体系的要求( ):A. 6.2B. 5.4C. 4.1D. 8.2.28、以下说法哪一个是错误的，并将其编号写在括号里( ): A. 过程是一项或一组活动，它具有输入、转化和输出的基本要素; B. 输入是过程的依据和要求，是实施转化的基础和前提; C. 输出是过程所要求实现的目标和结果;D. 相互关联反映过程中各项活动的相互影响和关系。

国际航空航天质量管理体系标准（AS9100）现状及技术发展动态江元英 曹秀玲 林树茂摘要：本文介绍了国际航空航天质量管理体系标准（AS9100）的产生背景和主要内容，分析并归纳了其应用情况、存在的问题及目前修订工作的技术动态。

文中还介绍了国际航空航天质量协调组织（IAQG）的组成和战略，整理、归纳了其发布的9100系列标准最新目录。

一、概述1、AS9100标准产生的背景及演变AS9100标准的产生源于航空航天工业的组织及其供方共同的需求。

航空航天工业的全球化以及地区/国家要求和期望的差异，使航空航天工业的组织及其供方面临严峻的挑战。

一方面，一个组织要面对众多的供方，组织面临着如何保证从世界各地和供应链中各层次的供方采购高质量的产品和实现采购要求规范化的挑战。

另一方面，一个供方也会面对众多的顾客，供方既要对不同的顾客交付具有不同质量期望和要求的产品，也要应对众多顾客要求不同的频繁的第二方审核。

因此，不论从组织还是组织的供方，都希望建立一个国际航空航天质量管理体系标准，统一航空航天质量管理体系要求，并用第三方认证取代对众多供方的第二方审核。

2000版ISO9001标准强化了标准的通用性和原则性，适用于所有产品类别、不同规模和各种类型的组织。

为了扩大2000版ISO9001标准的适用性，国际标准化组织质量管理与质量保证标准化技术委员会（ISO/TC176）扩大了与相关技术委员会和行业的合作，制订了有关行业的国际质量管理体系标准。

如ISO/TC176与国际汽车特别工作组合作，制订了汽车行业的国际标准ISO/TS 16949《质量管理体系——汽车生产件及相关维修零件组织应用ISO 9001：2000的特别要求》，与医疗器械质量管理及相关方面的技术委员会合作，制订了医疗器械行业的国际标准ISO 13485《医疗器械-质量管理体系-用于法规的要求》，与电气通讯服务行业合作，制订了电讯行业的质量管理体系标准TL9000等。

国际航空航天质量标准的构成SAE按IAQS9100最终草案发布AS9100 A版标准的同时，AECMA、SJAC也等同发布了EN9100、SJAC9100。

AS/EN/SJAC9100是质量管理体系标准，还有若干标准为其提供支持，即AS/EN/SJAC9101《质量体系评定》、AS/EN/SJAC9102《航空航天首件检验要求》、AS/EN/SJAC9103《关键特性波动管理》等。

AS9100 A●AS9100 A在最大范围内为航空航天工业统一了质量管理体系要求，为世界各地的组织使用供应链中各层次的供方建立了通用的要求，它包括适用的航空航天要求并结合了ISO9001：2000和ISO9001：1994质量管理体系模式，同时应强调AS9100 A 规定的质量管理体系要求是对合同和适用法律法规要求的补充，而不是替代。

AS9101●AS9101规定了评定报告、质量体系检查表的内容和形式，用于评定供方质量体系与AS9100符合程度的报告和记录表格。

●评定报告包括总的评定信息、评定结论、一般的供方信息、评定结果小结、评定记分表和纠正措施要求表。

AS9102●作为AS9100 中的附加要求，●首件检验是一个完整的、独立的、文件化的物理和功能检验过程，用于验证规定的生产方法是否能够生产出工程图纸、计划、采购订单、工程规范和/或其他适用的设计文件的可接受的零件。

●AS9102规定了航空航天产品首件检验的要求、范围、评价和记录内容。

AS9103●关键特性是指其波动对产品的配合、性能、使用寿命或可制造性产生重大影响的器材、过程或零件的特性，●AS9100 A提出了对关键特性的标识和控制要求，●如何对关键特性的波动进行管理以及达到这些管理要求的途径，在AS9103中作出了规定。

●主要内容包括：●了解影响关键特性的过程因素●使用合适的用于波动控制和减少波动分析的工具确定过程关键特性●对波动进行控制和能力评估●制定关键特性和过程参数控制的过程控制文件AS9100航空要求条款●1．范围●1．1总则●本标准包括了ISO 9001：20001质量管理体系要求并对航空工业质量管理体系规定了附加要求。

剩磁对镀层厚度磁性法测量的影响摘要：在对航空零件镀层厚度进行磁性法测量时，发现零件镀层厚度测量值再现性及重复性很差，通过对零件加工过程的分析，最终确认零件留有剩磁，并提出了解决措施。

关键词：镀层厚度；磁性法；测量系统能力中图分类号：XXXX文献标识码：A1/3引言镀层厚度是镀层性能最重要的指标，直接关系到零件的耐蚀性、氢脆性能等质量特性。

对于航空零件，为保证航空器的安全运行，对镀层厚度的要求尤为苛刻。

例如对于镀镉层厚度，民用产品一般执行GB/T 13346-1992《金属覆盖层钢铁上的镉电镀层》，仅要求镀层厚度不低于某个值。

但航空产品，因其对零件强度、尺寸精度、镀层结合力的需要，往往要求镀层应满足某一范围值。

如按照规范AMS-QQ-P-416E《电镀镉》要求，多数零件镀层厚度7.6-15.2μm。

电镀层厚度测量最常用的为磁性测厚法，其操作简单、精度高、适用范围广、不损伤镀层，但其准确度也易受表面粗糙度、基体金属的磁性等多种因素影响①-②。

1 厚度测量问题在对某飞机铰链臂镀镉层厚度进行测量时发现镀层厚度测量结果重复性和再现性极差，镀层厚度测量值严重偏离理论镀层厚度值。

该零件材料为15-5PH,热处理强度为150-170ksi，镀层厚度要求值为7.6μm-15.2μm。

为评估测量的重复性和再现性，采用测量系统分析（Measurement systems Analysis）方法进行了评估。

测量系统分析在航空航天领域多用于关键特性波动管理中③-④。

关键特性或过程没有能力、怀疑测量系统是最大的波动源、准备进行实验设计、测量系统改变时，应进行测量系统分析以避免测量系统对过程能力评价的影响。

测量系统分析一般采用精确性公差（PTC）作为评价指标。

PTC最好不超过10%。

PTC处于10-30%时，测量系统也许可用，也许需改善。

若PTC超过30%，则测量系统不可用，该量具不能为过程控制和过程能力提供证据。

在测量系统分析过程中，由两名检验员采用相同的磁性测厚仪（Mninitest2100）、相同的测试方案，对10项零件的制定位置进行了厚度测量，并采用Minitab软件进行了数据处理，测量系统分析结果见图1。