Rip van winkle分析
- 格式:doc
- 大小:18.50 KB
- 文档页数:4
Dame Van Winkle is described as a captious, man-eating woman who always scolds her husband in this story. But for me, Mrs. Winkle is a brave laborious woman As a villain, she makes Rip Van Winkle’s image of a “simple, good-natured man” more clear, and she is the carrier of the prejudice of women in that society. So in my opinion this story does carry sexual prejudice.Dame van winkle is a typical hellcat according to the description in the story. She always taxes with her husband volubly and acting very shrewish. Form the description of Rip as “a kind neighbor, and a husband who obeyed his wife” in the beginning if the story, we can see that in rip’s family, the person who role the roast is Dame Van Winkle and she controls her husband with her power. With this description, our first expression of Mrs. Winkle is that she is a domineering woman. When we read the sentence:”her tongue was endlessly going. Everything he said or did was sure to produce more angry talk.”we can get the image that Dame Van winkle is sharp-tongued and fractious. As the development of the plot, the author portrayed a picture that Mrs. Winkle break into the club to blame all the people about their worthlessness and idleness.After reading all these evidence above, it is easy for us to build up the expression that dame van winkle is a really virago in the small village. But if we read deeply into the story we can find that this kind of image is carrying a lot of prejudice. Mrs. Winkle is a special woman and she is brave and hardworking. The story tells us that rip is a kind and easy-going man, when his wife blames him, he never talk back. At the same time, the author also write that “Rip Van Winkle had one great fault; he disliked---indeed, he hated---any kind of profitable labour.” The condition of his farm is worse than any of his neighbors’but rip is still wondering in the woods or lazing away with the people in the club insteadof doing farm work. It means that as a man who should work and earn money to support his family, rip is a total failure. Then we will ask who is working to take care of the family? Of cause the answer is dame van winkle. Since the husband never takes his responsibility, the wife has to go out working like a man, do the entire house work and bring up the children. In the story when rip got back to his village, there is a sentence: “He entered the ruins of the house, which, to tell the truth, Dame Van Winkle had always kept in good order.” This means that Mrs. Winkle is a good housewife.Dame Van winkle is fractious and captious, but she has to be such a virago because her husband is a dawdler who never takes his responsibility. In the years that are described in the story, all the judgments about women are made by the men. A man who is always wondering and chatting with others can be forgiven and accepted by the public, but a woman who is brave to point out the worthlessness and idleness of men will be called a virago and the public will turn its back on her. From the story we can see that the people in Rip’s vi llage are described as:” Whenever they discussed the Van Winkle family's quarrels, they always decided that Dame Van Winkle was wrong.” And there are a lot of fainéant in the village, especially in the inn and these people’s wives must have compliant, but these women just choose to keep silent and comply. Only Dame Van Winkle has the courage to speak out. She not only blames her own husband but also censures the people who always connive these pokes. To my way of thinking, dame van winkle is a brave woman who is not afraid of speaking out her compliant in the patriarchal society.As a villain, Mrs. Winkle’s negative image helps the author to make Rip as the victim of a terrible wife. At the beginning of the story the author described Rip as a nice, easy-going man and everyone in the village likes him except of his wife. He is scolded often by often but never dareto fight back. The worse Mrs. Winkle is described, the pitiful Rip is considered. By this way, the story successfully convinced the readers to believe that a good woman should be quiet and submissive; they should never challenge the domination of men. Mrs. Winkle is a good carrier of the negative opinion of a powerful and brave woman that was hold by men.This story dose carries the sexual prejudice of women. First, the name of Mrs. Winkle is ironical. The word “dame” is a title for noble women but Mrs. Winkle is just a countrywoman who has no connection with a noble woman. The author here is using this word to show his sarcasm of women. Second, the reason for us to take Mrs. Winkle as a virago is that the adjectives and sentences that used by the author to describe Dame Van Winkle are all negative. Such as “what dog is ever brave enough to stand firm against the terrors of a woman's tongue?”and “Morn ing, noon, and night, her tongue was endlessly going.”Thirdly, the author never tries to describe details about Mrs. Winkle or any other women in this story. We only know her name and her typical image is a virago. This shows the author’s attitude towards women: ignore and depreciate. The same attitude can be seen from the depiction of Mrs. Winkle’s death:” She broke a blood vessel in anger at a man who came selling things at our door." This cause of death for Dame Van Winkle is like a joke, while at the end Rip gets a family and becomes the respectful old man in the village, his story is told once by once. With these evidences above we can see that the story carries sexual prejudice.As a conclusion, Dame Van Winkle is a brave, hardworking and respectful woman; she is described as a virago because the author wanted to show the readers the rule for women in the patriarchal society. So the story obviously has sexual prejudice.。
The Functions of Nature王雯In Rip Van Winkle, there are many descriptions about nature. And,it’s obvious that the writer paid much attention to them. In my personal view, nature has three functions in this novel.Firstly, descriptions of nature is necessary for setting the scene. Rip Van Winkle is an imaginative novel,writer uses dreamlike environment description and the people’s fancy experience to create atmosphere. Most of natural environment described in this novel is so beautiful that give people the sense of unreality.Secondly, descriptions of nature express the writer’s preference of nature. The writer himself loves nature in his real life. That makes him use flowery language and fertile imagination to present the expected nature in his heart. And one of the literary characteristics of Romanticism is they have a presumption that the natural world was a source of goodness and man’s society a source of corruption. They want to go back to nature and enjoy the leisure time. Puritan life style are no longer that popular among Americans,they begin to pursue what they really want. Nature is just a sample of what they are seeking.Thirdly, descriptions of nature convey the main idea of the novel--the desire for an escape from society. In this novel,Rip Van Winkle want to escape from his wife who rattles all the time and escape from his familywhich is annoying in his mind. Actually,Rip Van Winkle represents the backward generation who are unwilling to accept the reality that America has won its revolution. They are used to old life style and politics. Escape is always a good way to solve unexpected problem. In this novel, escape to nature euphemistically reflect the social condition.So, nature is an important part in this novel.。
The Analysis of Rip Van Winkle1. Introduction1.1 Introduction to the authorWashington Irving (April 3, 1783 –November 28, 1859) was an American author, essayist, biographer and historian of the early 19th century. He is best known for his short stories "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" and "Rip Van Winkle", both of which appear in his book The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent. He was a lawyer who pursued a writing career after he discovered that practicing law did not interest him. At a time when most Americans read British authors almost exclusively, Irving proved that American writers could compete with their British counterparts. He was among the first American writers who gained an international reputation by writing short stories. Irving, along with James Fenimore Cooper, was among the first American writers to earn acclaim in Europe. As America's first genuine internationally best-selling author, Irving advocated for writing as a legitimate profession, and argued for stronger laws to protect American writers from copyright infringement.Irving is largely credited as the first American Man of Letters and the first to earn his living solely by his pen. Irving perfected the American short story, and was the first American writer to place his stories firmly in the United States, even as he poached from German or Dutch folklore. As he says “writing stories is simply to entertain rather than to enlighten”. Irving also encouraged would-be writers. As George William Curtis noted, there "is not a young literary aspirant in the country, who, if he ever personally met Irving, did not hear from him the kindest words of sympathy, regard, and encouragement."1.2 Introduction to the storyRip Van Winkle is a short story based on a German folk tale, and adapted by the American writer Washington Irving published in 1819, as well as the name of the story's fictional protagonist. Written while Irving was living in Birmingham, England, it was part of a collection entitled The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon. Although the story is set in New York's CatskillMountains, Irving later admitted, "When I wrote the story, I had never been on the Catskills." The story of Rip Van Winkle is set in the years before and after the American Revolutionary War.2. PlotIn a pleasant village, at the foot of New York's Catskill Mountains, lives the kindly Rip Van Winkle, a colonial British-American villager of Dutch descent. Rip is an amiable man who enjoys solitary activities in the wilderness, but is also loved by all in town—especially the children to whom he tells stories and gives toys. However, a tendency to avoid all gainful labor, for which his nagging wife (Dame Van Winkle) chastises him, allows his home and farm to fall into disarray due to his lazy neglect.One autumn day, Rip is escaping his wife's nagging, wandering up the mountains with his dog, Wolf. Hearing his name being shouted, Rip discovers that the speaker is a man dressed in antiquated Dutch clothing, carrying a keg up the mountain, who requires Rip's help. Without exchanging words, the two hike up to an amphitheatre-like hollow in which Rip discovers the source of previously-heard thunderous noises: there is a group of other ornately-dressed, silent, bearded men who are playing nine-pins. Although there is no conversation and Rip does not ask the men who they are or how they know his name, he discreetly begins to drink some of their liquor, and soon falls asleep.He awakes in unusual circumstances: It seems to be morning, his gun is rotted and rusty, and his beard has grown a foot long and Wolf is nowhere to be found. Rip returns to his village where he finds that he recognizes no one. Asking around, he discovers that the village has changed a lot . He immediately gets into trouble when he proclaims himself a loyal subject of King George III, not knowing that the American Revolution has taken place; George III's portrait on the town inn has been replaced by that of George Washington. Rip is also disturbed to find another man is being called Rip Van Winkle (this is in fact his son, who has now grown up).An old local people recognize Rip and Rip is told that he has apparently been away from the village for twenty years. His wife has died and that his close friends have died in war or gone somewhere else. Rip's daughter is now a married woman and his son has grown up and become afarmer. His daughter takes him home but Rip resumes his habitual idleness, and his tale is solemnly taken to heart by the Dutch settlers, with other hen-pecked husbands, after hearing his story, wishing they could share in Rip's good luck, and have the luxury of sleeping through the hardships of war.3. Comment on the storyThis is a story full of romance and it is one of Washington Irving’s master works. In the novel he successfully portrays two main characters: Rip Van Winkle and his wife Dame Van Winkle. Rip Van Winkle as our hero, is a simple, good-natured man. He has little desire for life and he maintains a very good relationship with all his neighbors by helping them with their housework and playing with the kids in his village. He is absolutely a popular guy among the neighborhoods except in his own house. He never works on his own farm and never takes care of his own children, which makes his wife very angry. She blames him for his idleness, but he never takes it seriously, and he never fights back. On the contrary, Dame Van Winkle is aggressive and discipline. She thinks working is what one should do, and she takes all the responsibilities in her family. She works hard because she wants to achieve success from her working, but her husband just wants things to be natural, he does not want to change anything.From the diversity of the thinking of these two, the author shows us the differences and conflicts between two groups: the immature, self-centered, anti-intellectual American people and the puritanical discipline, hardworking American people. Their attitudes are different toward the changing society, so they choose the different life styles.In the story Rip Van Winkle is a man who has difficulties in facing his advancing age. As an adult and a married man, he should have taken good care of his family members, but he did not. Although he is mature in age but he is really immature in intelligence. He hangs out every day without doing anything good to his family. When his wife blames him for bring damage to the family he either listens or goes out to seek for the peace he wants. He is afraid to take the responsibilities belong to him and just leave them all to his wife. When he can not stand the nagging from his wife he walks away and sleeps for twenty years. By the time he wakes up, hischildren have grown up and he does not need to take responsibilities anymore. For all his life he is a man who tries to escape from his responsibilities, which shows his immature in handling the advancing responsibilities added by his advancing age.This novel somehow shows the author’s conse rvative attitude towards society and revolution. The hero in this novel does not accept any change in life, he wants everything to be natural, including his own field, and when he feels tired about the life in society, he goes to the mountain to be alone. In the story, the author makes the hero to sleep a few years before the war and wake up a few years after the war. He purposely skips that period of time. And when Rip returns to the village, he can’t understand the changes happened around him, and he thinks everything becomes so strange. All of these show the author’s menta l boycott and aversion to the revolution.The language of this novel is a good explanation for Washington Irving’s elegant writing style, it is full of humor and witty, and it can be said as the perfect model in American literature. The employing of the great number of local dialects and slangs makes the story more reliable and more acceptable for people. We can see lots of vivid descriptions in the story. So every time when we read, we can see the events, sceneries, actions and words lively in front of us.In conclusion, Rip Van Winkle is a classic novel, and we can definitely learn a lot from it. It is worth reading not only because the great story but also because the witty language, vivid description and Washing ton Irving’s gentle writing style.References:Rip Van Winkle and Other Stories Washington Irving 1996-12-01《瑞普·凡·温克尔》赏析《阅读与鉴赏(中旬)》2011年第05期王宏宇;程宁宁英美经典短篇小说赏析李金云 2008年08月美国短篇小说赏析范革新 2006年03月。
Analyze the character of Dame Van Winkle and discuss her function as a villain. Dose the story carry sexual prejudice?Dame Van Winkle is described as a captious, man-eating woman who always scolds her husband in this story. But for me, Mrs. Winkle is a brave laborious woman As a villain, she makes Rip Van Winkle’s image of a “simple, good-natured man” more clear, and she is the carrier of the prejudice of women in that society. So in my opinion this story does carry sexual prejudice.Dame van winkle is a typical hellcat according to the description in the story. She always taxes with her husband volubly and acting very shrewish. Form the description of Rip as “a kind neighbor, and a husband who obeyed his wife” in the beginning if the story, we can see that in rip’s family, the person who role the roast is Dame Van Winkle and she controls her husband with her power. With this description, our first expression of Mrs. Winkle is that she is a domineering woman. When we read the sentence:”her tongue was endlessly going. Everything he said or did was sure to produce more angry talk.”we can get the image that Dame Van winkle is sharp-tongued and fractious. As the development of the plot, the author portrayed a picture that Mrs. Winkle break into the club to blame all the people about their worthlessness and idleness.After reading all these evidence above, it is easy for us to build up the expression that dame van winkle is a really virago in the small village. But if we read deeply into the story we can find that this kind of image is carrying a lot of prejudice. Mrs. Winkle is a special woman and she is brave and hardworking. The story tells us that rip is a kind and easy-going man, when his wife blames him, he never talk back. At the same time, the author also write that “Rip Van Winkle had one great fault; he disliked---indeed, he hated---any kind of profitable labour.” The condition of his farm is worse than any of his neighbors’ but rip is still wondering in the woods or lazing away with the people in the club instead of doing farm work. It means that as a man who should work and earn money to support his family, rip is a total failure. Then we will ask who is working to take care of the family? Of cause the answer is dame vanwinkle. Since the husband never takes his responsibility, the wife has to go out working like a man, do the entire house work and bring up the children. In the story when rip got back to his village, there is a sentence: “He entered the ruins of the house, which, to tell the truth, Da me Van Winkle had always kept in good order.” This means that Mrs. Winkle is a good housewife.Dame Van winkle is fractious and captious, but she has to be such a virago because her husband is a dawdler who never takes his responsibility. In the years that are described in the story, all the judgments about women are made by the men. A man who is always wondering and chatting with others can be forgiven and accepted by the public, but a woman who is brave to point out the worthlessness and idleness of men will be called a virago and the public will turn its back on her. From the story we can see that the people in Rip’s village are described as:” Whenever they discussed the Van Winkle family's quarrels, they always decided that Dame Van Winkle was wrong.” And there are a lot of fainéant in the village, especially in the inn and these people’s wives must have compliant, but these women just choose to keep silent and comply. Only Dame Van Winkle has the courage to speak out. She not only blames her own husband but also censures the people who always connive these pokes. To my way of thinking, dame van winkle is a brave woman who is not afraid of speaking out her compliant in the patriarchal society.As a villain, Mrs. Winkle’s negative image helps the author to make Rip as the victim of a terrible wife. At the beginning of the story the author described Rip as a nice, easy-going man and everyone in the village likes him except of his wife. He is scolded often by often but never dare to fight back. The worse Mrs. Winkle is described, the pitiful Rip is considered. By this way, the story successfully convinced the readers to believe that a good woman should be quiet and submissive; they should never challenge the domination of men. Mrs. Winkle is a good carrier of the negative opinion of a powerful and brave woman that was hold by men.This story dose carries the sexual prejudice of women. First, the name of Mrs. Winkle is ironical. The word “dame” is a title for noble women but Mrs. Winkle is just a countrywoman who has no connection with a noble woman. The author here isusing this word to show his sarcasm of women. Second, the reason for us to take Mrs. Winkle as a virago is that the adjectives and sentences that used by the author to describe Dame Van Winkle are all negative. Such as “what dog is ever brave enough to stand firm against the terrors of a woman's tongue?” and “Morning, noon, and night, her tongue was endlessly going.”Thirdly, the author never tries to describe details about Mrs. Winkle or any other women in this story. We only know her name and her typical image is a virago. This shows the author’s attitude towards women: ignore and depreciate. The same attitude can be seen from the depiction of Mrs. Winkle’s death:” She broke a blood vessel in anger at a man who came selling things at our door." This cause of death for Dame Van Winkle is like a joke, while at the end Rip gets a family and becomes the respectful old man in the village, his story is told once by once. With these evidences above we can see that the story carries sexual prejudice.As a conclusion, Dame Van Winkle is a brave, hardworking and respectful woman; she is described as a virago because the author wanted to show the readers the rule for women in the patriarchal society. So the story obviously has sexual prejudice.。
RIP VAN WINKLE is a famous tale written by Washington Irving, telling about a story in which an old man named Rip Van Winkle, who lived in a little Dutch town in the Hudson Valley. Everyone in the town was fond of him because he would help anyone. The thing he would like to do was go out and fish or go to the town inn and listen to the gossip. However, his wife Dame Van Winkle would get angry at him for being lazy and not caring about the farm and family. One day he decided to get away from his wife’s swear then he took his gun and dog and go into the woods to hunt squirrels. As he returned, he saw a weird man appeared carrying a keg of liquor on his back. Thus, he helped the old man to carry the liquor to an amphitheatre where he saw several weird dressed people playing nine pins. The old man poured liquor for the people to drink and Rip started to drink until he passed out on the ground. The next morning he woke up and returned to the village where he came from, and found everything changed. People talked about revolution and election, and he has no idea of what that mean.As far as I know, the author made an incredible impact from this short story "Rip Van Winkle", and he drawing the events surrounding him to form a simple story with deep meaning.And this tale gives us a definition about what the country became after the revolutionary war and how the British perceive the Americans. There have been many comments on this tale saying that it shows theauthor's attitude against the American revolution and his approving of the past. However, when reading it the second time, I found it that Erving only showed his confusion: freeing out of the oppressed life, people were at a loss about what they should do.First, Rip was not happy long before revolution, and he hated to do labor work on his own business, and he was constantly under the criticism of his wife. Surely Dame was superior to Rip in his family, so the life of Rip could not at all be happy.Secondly, Rip showed no opposition against the new America. After he had settled down in the village, he even made friends with the young generation, enjoying the idle life he had long been dreamed of.In my opinion, there is strong resemblance between Rip Van Winkle and the American people, Dame Van Winkle and the English government. Before revolution, Rip was a meek man who "would rather die on a penny than work for a pound", who had good relationships with the villagers. He lived a peaceful life except for the existence of Dame Van Winkle, his termagant wife who would taught him lessons in every possible way. The American people were also trying to live a peaceful life but the rule of the British government made it impossible. The Americans suffered the oppression for a long time.The war was over and Rip returned to his village only to find the great change in the small village, which is the sample of the change in Americato some extent. No one in the village recognized him. People talked about hot issues he has no interested in. Dame Van Winkle was gone and he was free now. However, he had no idea what he should do. The past had passed for ever, despotism was gone. No one was going to tell Rip what he should do. No one was going to force him to do anything. The American people are free to choose now, but they have no idea of what to choose. They were leading into a new kind of life and groping in the dark for the way ahead.。
作者简介:华盛顿·欧文(Washington Irving)(1789—1895),美国浪漫主义作家,也是一个纯文学作家,他的写作态度是”writing for pleasure and to produce pleasure"。
欧文的代表作有《见闻札记》(Sketch Book),这是第一部伟大的青少年读物,也是美国本土作家第一部成功的小说。
由于欧文对美国文学的伟大贡献,他获得了“美国文学之父”的光荣称号。
这篇短篇小说,《瑞普·凡·温克尔》便是摘自《见闻札记》.Rip Van WinkleA Posthumous Writing of Diedrich KnickerbockerBy Washington Irving(T HE FOLLOWING tale was found among the papers of the late Diedrich Knickerbocker, an old gentleman of New York,who was very curious in the Dutch history of the province,and the manners of the descendants from its primitive settlers。
His historical researches,however, did not lie so much among books as among men; for the former are lamentably scanty on his favorite topics;whereas he found the old burghers, and still more their wives, rich in that legendary lore so invaluable to true history。
2010年美国文学课程论文题目Idleness in Characters of Rip Van Winkle 专业班级 2007级英语1班学号0710010123学生姓名X-X指导教师陈智平指导教师职称教授学院名称外语学院完成日期: 2010 年 6 月 1日Idleness in Characters of Rip Van WinkleAbstractWashington Irving held the proposition in writing not to attempt to lofty theme or to seek to look wise and learned and preferred addressing himself to the feelings and fancy of the reader more than his judgment. This paper is aimed at analyzing contextually his mas terpiece, “Rip Van Winkle” according to these ideas to which he adhered in composition. It utilizes the thought that avoids moralizing from the point of focusing on Rip Van Winkle himself, in particular his characters. As an important part of Rip’s disposi tion, idleness complements and enriches the figure of Rip. This paper concentrates on an analysis of Rip’s characters at first then of his idleness and attempts to seek what causes the idleness and what the idleness reflects.Key words: Rip Van Winkle; character; idleness; cause; implication1.Introduction“Rip Van Winkle”,one immortal article in “The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent” of Washing Irving, tells us an unbelievable and magical adventure of a henpecked villager. Rip Van Winkle, the protagonist, goes hunting in quest for peace escaping from his wife in the Kaatskill Mountains, meets a host of singular men playing ninepins, drinks their beverage and has a deep sleep for twenty years. When he returns home, not knowing the American Revolutionary War has taken place, he finds almost everything has changed. It takes him some time to adjust himself to the changes and live a normal life.“Rip Van Winkle” is of eternal fascination, which often attributes to expressing changes with continuity and preservation of tradition and presenting the magic of imagination in the short story (/wiki/Rip_van_Winkle). But success of an excellent fiction can also be found on the figures it creates. So this paper skips huge topics like history, time, life and death but to have an analysis of the Nobody, Rip Van Winkle, in the village.2. Rip’s charactersThe vivid description in the article gives a general outline of Rip’s entire personalities. As has been modeled, Rip is “a simple good-natured man”, “a kind neighbor”, “an obedient henpecked husband”, and “a pliant and malleable farmer” and has “a happy mortal of foolish, well-oiled disposition” (Irving, 811-812).Since people’s characters are connected with their surroundings, it is necessary to first have a look at the village in which Rip lives before analyzing his personalities. The voyagers up the Hudson may have described, at a distance, the light smoke and curling from the village, which indicates the village is away from the metropolis. In this beautifully rural village with sequestered spots, people mostly conducting agricultural production are easy to be content with what they have got and will get. For Rip Van Winkle, little necessity or stress is laid on him to desire extra material achievement. However, enjoying a loose life with friends and neighbors is essential and dispensable in his life. Actually, Rip exercises this tip of theory thoroughly and “would rather starve on a penny than work for a pound” (Irving, 812). Thanks to the surroundings, without much pressure of survival, Rip hold no responsibil ity to admire the more or the better but “whichever can be got with least thought or trouble” (Irving, 812).As a result, he is naturally of simplicity and good nature as a happy mortal. This belief of Rip may be probably viewed as not ambitious or enterprising because it resists change and advance. But in such a solitary village, it is really hard to expect Rip to possess super-real dreams. What’s important to him is that, apart from rural occupation, he could do what he likes. And considering the life style of early Dutch colonists who settled in America, agriculture and handcraft mainly included, there is a rough speculation about the life of the villagers. Men are engaged in regular work on the farm to produce cabbages, corn and potatoes to support the family and further to earn money for daily expenditure. Women take care of children “trooping like a colt at mother’s heel” (Irving, 812), assist men with farm work, deal with trivial jobs at home and give curtain lectures to their husbands. From these typical rural activities it is obvious that people are living in quietness. This kind of serene setting, similar to the village in “The Pride of the Village” by Washington Irving, too, contributes to the formation and stability of Rip’s characters.Besides, the village is indeed not huge in size, just “a little village, of great antiquity” (Irving, 812), compared with the different, “larger and more populous” (Irving, 816) one Rip sees when he comes back after a deep sleep. In rural region, sometimes the smaller, the better. Contrasting with big towns, cities which are flush with thousands of people, a small village lacks noises and has a much slower life pace with peace. People could meet each other frequently on the country load and farmland day and night. Constant contracts could bring warm greetings, instant assistance, shared enjoyment and harmonious relationship. Among people widely blessed with kindness, there is little strange for Rip to be a kind neighbor.With regard to Rip’s obedient henpecked chara cteristics and pliant, malleable conscience, to comprehend it only requests a respect to the authority of Dame Van Winkle, the neck determining the turns of head at home. And the shrew will help to check the distinguishing features of Rip. Her tongue also can make other personages in the village scare, let alone Rip. In company with such a powerful madam, Rip can hardly be self-determined or strong-minded.3. Rip’s idlenessAmong the errors in disposition of Rip, “idle” is the one incessantly mentioned an d criticized byhis wife. She “kept continually dining in his ears about his idleness” (Irving, 813), which puts up with a question about Rip, born, growing, and living in the serenity of rural life. How could a kind-hearted and versatile farmer, who is at the disposal of people in need of his assistance, be idle? In another word, where does idleness in his disposition come from? Though the judgment of Dame Van Winkle does not point out where the idleness originates and derive from, it is still possible to read between lines to find some hints in the article to finish this remaining task.First, the existence of Rip’s idleness is due to a set of contradiction, Rip’s merits and the environment, or the setting. At the respect of Rip himself, he is not in “wan t of assiduity or perseverance” (Irving, 812), which is exemplified by what he does with pleasure. One thing is that he could spend a whole day fishing with a long and heavy rod eventually with no fish nibble at all, and the other is that it takes him hours to trudge in the mountain just hunting for a few squirrels or wild pigeons. Although there is tiredness on rock paths, dangers from beasts and probability of getting nothing, Rip seldom cares them and does what he intends to do with enthusiasm. And in th e children’s view, Rip is absolutely talented, for he “assisted at their sports, made their playthings, taught them to fly kites and shoot marbles, and told them long stories of ghosts, witches, and Indians” (Irving, 812). The children assure that a man pr oficient in so many skills could and should be their favorite. They prove Rip’s worthy talents from a childish but delicate angle. And, in a larger sense, from children to adults, Rip is obliging. Indication of his wonder that “he had thought himself acquainted with every one in the country” (Irving, 817) suggests that he knows villagers well and have a good relationship with them. Owing to the familiarity and his kindness, women used to employ him to run errands and do odd jobs. And Rip is often ready to a ttend their business. Rip’s behavior, his internal quality and people’ attitudes towards him can be regarded as evidence that Rip is in harmony with his inner world and with people surrounding. They, at the same time, throw light upon Rip’s merits.After acquiring a general knowledge of what kind of person Rip is, the focus turns to the environment. Here Kaatskill Mountains and Rip’s farm in the environment can be taken as examples to make the contradiction clear. As has been mentioned, the village is at the foot of Kaatskill Mountains. Like old castle and dark basement in Gothic fictions, mountain which is relatively stationary to witness and has a nearly infinitely capacity to absorb constitutes an irreplaceable setting for occurrence of mysteries. Kaatskill Mountains, said to be often haunted by spirits, are home of many creatures and measure for villagers, furnishing plants, animals and other villagers but forget to fertilize Rip’s farm. Instead, they make his fence fall into pieces and disorient his cow and nurture weeds rather than farm produce. At last, Rip’s farm is “the most pestilent little ground in the whole country” and “every thing about it went wrong, and would go wrong” (Irving, 812). Moreover, the mountains with magical hues and shapes are pr aised by wives as perfect barometers, however, it fails to guide Rip to arrange properly to do farm wok outside because “the rain always made a point of setting in just have he had some out-door to do” (Irving, 812). The farm should have been the ground where Rip exercises all his talents to produce probably the most corn and potatoes and devote himself to creating a better family life. Unfortunately, the odds are so slim. And Rip’s talents have nowhere to go, leaving his house time-worn, his children ragged and wild, and his wife complaining.Now, the contradiction is clear that the environment is brutally against Rip’s merits, which are more likely to be seen when Rip plays the role as a hard-working farmer. Without the stage to work industriously, Rip seems to a bird without wings, a fish off water, a tree with rotted root and a stream with source blocked. In spite of little survival pressure, Rip is under the despotism of environment under which he has long groaned. With little hope of harvest on the ground, Rip is converted to have “an insuperable aversion to all kinds of profitable labor” (Irving, 812). If the story is a painting in accordance with Irving’s preference to envelope stories in an atmosphere, Kaatskill Mountains are the picture frame, the village is the setting in the frame, the farm is special point of the setting and Rip, miserable and having no alternative and even a little desperate, is the center. That Rip is restricted strictly can be spotted from the painting. His merits are oppressed and constrained into so-called idleness.Following the collision between Rip’s characters and the environment, conflict between Rip and his wife Dame Van Winkle is another paradox to which the idleness owes. In general sense, the environment is the funda mental cause for Rip’s characters and people close to him have a final say to affect his thoughts, behavior, and then his personalities. And Dame Van Winkle is the very factor with dominant strength to pull Rip under her principle. She discovers Rip’s idle ness and gives her tongue not a bit rest from morning to noon till night, complaining he brought ruin to the family and totally lost the glory of ancestors during the age of Peter Stuyvesant. It is in her eye that whatever Rip said or did should deserve countless household eloquence from her. The individual judgment reflects the close relationship between Rip and idleness, for Dame V an Winkle is his life companion. But Rip, appearing to have been accustomed to the blame, grows into a habit that he “shrugged his shoulder, shook his head, cast up his eyes but said nothing” (Irving, 813) as a response. Since one is eager to criticize while the other is indifferent, how cannot the conflict break?When Rip’s meekness cannot stand the volley of words he goes to t he outside. But the conflict, though having driven Rip away from home, does not come to an end. Leaving home, Rip consoles himself by frequently the village club before the inn “designated by a rubicund portrait of His Majesty George the Third” (Irving, 813). But he was still unlucky to be traced by his termagant wife. From home to inn, all the way covers shadow of idleness Dame Van Winkle frowns at. At home, needless to repeat, she discontents Rip’s performance and defines it as idleness that brings the family in gloom. Furthermore, the dog Wolfe is unable to get rid of the blame that his hostess regards him as his master’s companion in idleness. Before the inn, Dame Van Winkle would suddenly break in the session sometimes and “call the members all to naught” (Irving, 814). What’s more, taking into account the portrait of the George the Third who is a symbol with nobility and power, shouldn’t one give considerable respect? It isn’t Dame Van Winkle’s choice. She leaves the rule behind, and charges them of encouraging his husband in habits of idleness. The conflict between Rip and his wife extends from home to the inn, leading Rip to have to escape from home and inn and finally go into the mountains. Away from home, he is not capable of much work, instead, addi cted to hunting in the depths of the mountains. Like “the flock of idle crows” (Irving, 816) that answers Rip’s call when he awake suddenly, Rip is of idleness all the time.Coincidences on Rip’s farm can result in the assumption that Rip and his ground h as been cursed.The environment in which Rip does not behave insistently with his virtues makes it impossible for Rip to be super on the ground but to be idle off the land. The shrew Dame Van Winkle, whose tongue “grows keener with constant use” (Irving, 813) as years go by, makes the home and the inn not suitable for Rip, drives him into the woods with idleness. To conclude, the conformation and establishment idleness is due to contradictions between Rip with environment and his wife, which both benefits the appreciation of this vivid figure who has been known to all households for nearly two hundred years in America and will long endure.4.ConclusionThere is a string of idleness in the story. Before he strolls away into the woods in which he has the long sleep, he shares idleness with the dog Wolfe at home and with other idle villagers, say, “the sages, philosophers, and other idle personages” (Irving, 813), in the session. After the sleep lasting twenty years and returning the village, he resumes his idle ness and can be “at that happy age” and “can be idle with impunity” (Irving, 820). Other hen-pecked neighborhoods also wish to “have a quieting draught out of Rip Van Winkle’ flagon” (Irving, 821), showing that people similar to Rip exist and the number is not small. It further proves that idleness is still widely spread. And his son young Rip inherits the idleness, suggesting idleness is obtained by the next generation. Maybe one day in the village will appear another Rip Van Winkle with the character of idleness. So it is proper to say idleness of Rip comes from his life, consummates his characters and will go back to his life at length.Bibliography[1] Robert M. Stevenson, Jane L. Stevenson, eds. North America Short Stories. Hong Kong: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., 1976. Book 1, p.15-26.[2] Nina Baym, et al. The Norton Anthology of American Literature, 3rd ed.. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1989, vol. 1, part 2, p.810-821.[3] James H. Pickering, ed. An Anthology of Short Stories. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc., 1974: p.459-467.[4] Dong Qiu-min. On the Charm of “Rip Van Winkle”. Journal of He’nan University (Social Science), Sep. 2001, vol. 41, No.5.[4] Washington Irving. The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories. New York: Airmont Pub., Co.,1904.[6] 彭家海, 主编. 新编实用美国文学教程. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社. 2005.。
Analyze the character of Dame Van Winkle and discuss her function as a villain. Dose the story carry sexual prejudiceDame Van Winkle is described as a captious, man-eating woman who always scolds her husband in this story. But for me, Mrs. Winkle is a brave laborious woman As a villain, she makes Rip Van Winkle’s image of a “simple, good-natured man” more clear, and she is the carrier of the prejudice of women in that society. So in my opinion this story does carry sexual prejudice.Dame van winkle is a typical hellcat according to the description in the story. She always taxes with her husband volubly and acting very shrewish. Form the description of Rip as “a kind neighbor, and a husband who obeyed his wife” in the beginning if the story, we can see that in rip’s family, the person who role the roast is Dame Van Winkle and she controls her husband with her power. With this description, our first expression of Mrs. Winkle is that she is a domineering woman. When we read the sentence:”her tongue was endlessly going. Everything he said or did was sure to produce more angry talk.”we can get the image that Dame Van winkle is sharp-tongued and fractious. As the development of the plot, the author portrayed a picture that Mrs. Winkle break into the club to blame all the people about their worthlessness and idleness.After reading all these evidence above, it is easy for us to build up the expression that dame van winkle is a really virago in the small village. But if we read deeply into the story we can find that this kind of image is carrying a lot of prejudice. Mrs. Winkle is a special woman and she is brave and hardworking. The story tells us that rip is a kindand easy-going man, when his wife blames him, he never talk back. At the same time, the author also write that “Rip Van Winkle had one great fault; he disliked---indeed, he hated---any kind of profitable labour.” The condition of his farm is worse than any of his neighbors’but rip is still wondering in the woods or lazing away with the people in the club instead of doing farm work. It means that as a man who should work and earn money to support his family, rip is a total failure. Then we will ask who is working to take care of the family Of cause the answer is dame van winkle. Since the husband never takes his responsibility, the wife has to go out working like a man, do the entire house work and bring up the children. In the story when rip got back to his village, there is a sentence: “He entered the ruins of the house, which, to tell the truth, Dame Van Winkle had always kept in good order.” This means that Mrs. Winkle is a good housewife.Dame Van winkle is fractious and captious, but she has to be such a virago because her husband is a dawdler who never takes his responsibility. In the years that are described in the story, all the judgments about women are made by the men. A man who is always wondering and chatting with others can be forgiven and accepted by the public, but a woman who is brave to point out the worthlessness and idleness of men will be called a virago and the public will turn its back on her. From the story we can see that the people in Rip’s village are described as:” Whenever they discussed the Van Winkle family's quarrels, they always decided that Dame Van Winkle was wrong.” And there are a lot of fainéant in the village, especially in the inn and these people’s wives must have compliant, but these women just choose to keep silent and comply. Only Dame Van Winkle has the courage to speak out. She not only blames her own husband but also censures thepeople who always connive these pokes. To my way of thinking, dame van winkle is a brave woman who is not afraid of speaking out her compliant in the patriarchal society.As a villain, Mrs. Winkle’s negative image helps the author to make Rip as the victim of a terrible wife. At the beginning of the story the author described Rip as a nice, easy-going man and everyone in the village likes him except of his wife. He is scolded often by often but never dare to fight back. The worse Mrs. Winkle is described, the pitiful Rip is considered. By this way, the story successfully convinced the readers to believe that a good woman should be quiet and submissive; they should never challenge the domination of men. Mrs. Winkle is a good carrier of the negative opinion of a powerful and brave woman that was hold by men.This story dose carries the sexual prejudice of women. First, the name of Mrs. Winkle is ironical. The word “dame” is a title for noble women but Mrs. Winkle is just a countrywoman who has no connection with a noble woman. The author here is using this word to show his sarcasm of women. Second, the reason for us to take Mrs. Winkle as a virago is that the adjectives and sentences that used by the author to describe Dame Van Winkle are all negative. Such as “what dog is ever brave enough to stand firm against the terrors of a woman's tongue” and “Morning, noon, and night, her tongue was endlessly going.”Thirdly, the author never tries to describe details about Mrs. Winkle or any other women in this story. We only know her name and her typical image is a virago. This shows the author’s attitude towards women: ignore and depreciate. The same attitude can be seen from the depiction of Mrs. Winkle’s death:” She broke a blood vessel in anger at a man who came selling things at our door." This cause of death for Dame Van Winkle is like a joke, while at the endRip gets a family and becomes the respectful old man in the village, his story is told once by once. With these evidences above we can see that the story carries sexual prejudice.As a conclusion, Dame Van Winkle is a brave, hardworking and respectful woman; she is described as a virago because the author wanted to show the readers the rule for women in the patriarchal society. So the story obviously has sexual prejudice.。
Rip Van WinkleRip Van Winkle is a well-known short story by American writer Washington Irving. The story tells the adventure of Rip Van Winkle, a lazy villager who wanders into the mountains and meets a group of dwarves, and falls asleep under a tree. He wakes up after 20 years and finds himself in an unfamiliar world, facing many changes and challenges。
Rip Van Winkle is a simple but profound story that explores themes such as time and space, as well as the impact of history and society on individual lives. The story also reflects the author's attitude towards society and his concern for the plight of ordinary people。
The protagonist of the story, Rip Van Winkle, is a lazy, good-natured man who is content to live in his own world and shun work. His character design is simple, but it represents a certain group of people who are satisfied with their own lives and refuse to face reality. Rip's encounter with the dwarves represents his first step out of his comfort zone, and his encounter with the changed world upon his return from the mountain represents his struggle to adapt to the changes in his life。
ripvanwinkle读后感中文(中英文版)After immersing myself in Washington Irving"s classic short story "Rip Van Winkle," I was deeply impressed by the timeless themes and thought-provoking messages it conveys.Set in the Catskill Mountains, the story follows the protagonist Rip Van Winkle, an amiable yet lazy man who escapes his domestic responsibilities by wandering into the mountains.There, he encounters a group of mysterious men and falls into a deep sleep for twenty years.The story"s portrayal of the passage of time and its impact on individuals is particularly striking.Rip"s long slumber serves as a metaphor for the rapid changes that occur in society.Upon awakening, he finds himself in a world that has moved on without him.This raises questions about the nature of time and the consequences of shirking responsibilities.It"s a reminder that life doesn"t pause for anyone, and the choices we make have lasting effects.Moreover, the story offers a critique of the American Dream.Rip Van Winkle, despite his good nature, is unable to provide for his family.His preference for leisure over work leads to his downfall and the loss of his wife"s respect.This challenges the traditional notion that hard work always leads to success and prosperity.The character of Rip Van Winkle himself is a fascinating study.Hischildlike innocence and trusting nature make him endearing, yet his laziness and avoidance of responsibility are frustrating.Irving uses Rip to explore the complexities of human nature and the struggle between idleness and productivity.In conclusion, "Rip Van Winkle" is a thought-provoking tale that delves into the consequences of avoiding responsibilities and the relentless march of time.It serves as a cautionary reminder that life is short, and we must seize the day, while also questioning societal norms and expectations.在深入阅读华盛顿·欧文的经典短篇小说《瑞普·凡·温克尔》之后,我对其中跨越时代的主题和发人深省的信息留下了深刻的印象。
瑞普·凡·温克尔RipVanWinkle中英文对照与summary作者简介: ﻫ华盛顿·欧文(WashingtonIrving)(1789—1895), 美国浪漫主义作家,也是一个纯文学作家,他的写作态度是"writing for pleasureand to produce pleasure"。
欧文的代表作有《见闻札记》(Sketch Book),这是第一部伟大的青少年读物,也是美国本土作家第一部成功的小说。
由于欧文对美国文学的伟大贡献,他获得了“美国文学之父”的光荣称号。
这篇短篇小说,《瑞普·凡·温克尔》便是摘自《见闻札记》。
Rip VanWinkleA Posthumous WritingofDiedrich KnickerbockerﻫBy Washington Irving(THE FOLLOWING tale was found amo ng the papersof the lateDiedrich Kni ckerbocker, an old gentleman of New York, who wasvery curious in the Dutch history of the province, and the manners of the descendants from itsprimitive settlers. His historical researches, however, didnot lie so much among books as among men; for the former are lamentabl yscanty on his favorite topics;whereas he foundthe old burghers, and still more their wives,rich in that legendary lore so invaluable totrue histo ry。
作者简介:华盛顿·欧文(Washington Irving)(1789-1895), 美国浪漫主义作家,也是一个纯文学作家,他的写作态度是"writing for pleasure and to produce pleasure"。
欧文的代表作有《见闻札记》(Sketch Book),这是第一部伟大的青少年读物,也是美国本土作家第一部成功的小说。
由于欧文对美国文学的伟大贡献,他获得了“美国文学之父”的光荣称号。
这篇短篇小说,《瑞普·凡·温克尔》便是摘自《见闻札记》。
Rip Van WinkleA Posthumous Writing of Diedrich KnickerbockerBy Washington Irving(T HE FOLLOWING tale was found among the papers of the late Diedrich Knickerbocker, an old gentleman of New York, who was very curious in the Dutch history of the province, and the manners of the descendants from its primitive settlers. His historical researches, however, did not lie so much among books as among men; for the former are lamentably scanty on his favorite topics; whereas he found the old burghers, and still more their wives, rich in that legendary lore so invaluable to true history. Whenever, therefore, he happened upon a genuine Dutch family, snugly shut up in its low-roofed farmhouse, under a spreading sycamore, he looked upon it as a little clasped volume of black-letter, and studied it with the zeal of a bookworm.The result of all these researches was a history of the province during the reign of the Dutch governors, which he published some years since. There have been various opinions as to the literary character of his work, and, to tell the truth, it is not a whit better than it should be. Its chief merit is its scrupulous accuracy, which indeed was a little questioned on its first appearance, but has since been completely established; and it is how admitted into all historical collections as a book of unquestionable authority.The old gentleman died shortly after the publication of his work, and now that he is dead and gone it cannot do much harm to his memory to say that his time might have been much better employed in weightier labors. He, however, was apt to ride his hobby in his own way; and though it did now and then kick up the dust a little in the eyes of his neighbors and grieve the spirit of some friends, for whom he felt the truest deference and affection, yet his errors and follies are remembered “more in sorrow than in anger”; and it begins to be suspected that he never intended to injure or offend. But however his memory may be appreciated by critics, it is still held dear among many folk whose good opinion is well worth having; particularly by certain biscuit bakers, who have gone so far as to imprint his likeness on their New Year cakes, and have thus given him a chance for immortality almost equal to the being stamped on a Waterloo medal or a Queen Anne’s fart hing.)By Woden, God of Saxons,From whence comes Wensday, that is Wodensday,Truth is a thing that ever I will keepUnto thylke day in which I creep intoMy sepulchre—C ARTWRIGHT.Whoever has made a voyage up the Hudson must remember the Catskill Mountains. They are a dismembered branch of the great Appalachian family, and are seen away to the west of the river, swelling up to a noble height, and lording it over the surrounding country. Every change of season, every change of weather, indeed, every hour of the day, produces some change in the magical hues and shapes of these mountains, and they are regarded by all the good wives, far and near, as perfect barometers. When the weather is fair and settled, they are clothed in blue and purple, and print their bold outlines on the clear evening sky; but sometimes, when the rest of the landscape is cloudless, they will gather a hood of gray vapors about their summits, which, in the last rays of the setting sun, will glow and light up like a crown of glory.At the foot of these fairy mountains the voyager may have descried the light smoke curling up from a village whose shingle roofs gleam among the trees, just where the blue tints of the upland melt away into the fresh green of the nearer landscape. It is a little village of great antiquity, having been founded by some of the Dutch colonists, in the early times of the province, just about the beginning of the government of the good Peter Stuyvesant (may he rest in peace!), and there were some of the houses of the original settlers standing within a few years, with lattice windows, gable fronts surmounted with weathercocks, and built of small yellow bricks brought from Holland.In that same village, and in one of these very houses (which, to tell the precise truth, was sadly time-worn and weather-beaten), there lived many years since, while the country was yet a province of Great Britain, a simple, good-natured fellow, of the name of Rip Van Winkle. He was a descendant of the Van Winkles who figured so gallantly in the chivalrous days of Peter Stuyvesant, and accompanied him to the siege of Fort Christina. He inherited, however, but little of the martial character of his ancestors. I have observed that he was a simple, good-natured man; he was, moreover, a kind neighbor and an obedient, henpecked husband. Indeed, to the latter circumstance might be owing that meekness of spirit which gained him such universal popularity; for those men are most apt to be obsequious and conciliating abroad who are under the discipline of shrews at home. Their tempers, doubtless, are rendered pliant and malleable in the fiery furnace of domestic tribulation, and a curtain lecture is worth all the sermons in the world for teaching the virtues of patience and long-suffering. A termagant wife may, therefore, in some respects, be considered a tolerable blessing; and if so, Rip Van Winkle was thrice blessed.Certain it is that he was a great favorite among all the good wives of the village, who, as usual with the amiable sex, took his part in all family squabbles, and never failed, whenever they talked those matters over in their evening gossipings, to lay allthe blame on Dame Van Winkle. The children of the village, too, would shout with joy whenever he approached. He assisted at their sports, made their playthings, taught them to fly kites and shoot marbles, and told them long stories of ghosts, witches, and Indians. Whenever he went dodging about the village, he was surrounded by a troop of them, hanging on his skirts, clambering on his back, and playing a thousand tricks on him with impunity; and not a dog would bark at him throughout the neighborhood.The great error in Rip’s composition was an insuperable aversion to all kinds of profitable labor. It could not be from the want of assiduity or perseverance; for he would sit on a wet rock, with a rod as long and heavy as a Tartar’s lance, and fish all day without a murmur, even though he should not be encouraged by a single nibble. He would carry a fowling piece on his shoulder, for hours together, trudging through woods and swamps, and up hill and down dale, to shoot a few squirrels or wild pigeons. He would never even refuse to assist a neighbor in the roughest toil, and was a foremost man at all country frolics for husking Indian corn, or building stone fences. The women of the village, too, used to employ him to run their errands, and to do such little odd jobs as their less obliging husbands would not do for them; in a word, Rip was ready to attend to anybody’s business but his own; but as to doing family duty, and keeping his farm in order, it was impossible.In fact, he declared it was of no use to work on his farm; it was the most pestilent little piece of ground in the whole country; everything about it went wrong, and would go wrong, in spite of him. His fences were continually falling to pieces; his cow would either go astray or get among the cabbages; weeds were sure to grow quicker in his fields than anywhere else; the rain always made a point of setting in just as he had some outdoor work to do; so that though his patrimonial estate had dwindled away under his management, acre by acre, until there was little more left than a mere patch of Indian corn and potatoes, yet it was the worst-conditioned farm in the neighborhood.His children, too, were as ragged and wild as if they belonged to nobody. His son Rip, an urchin begotten in his own likeness, promised to inherit the habits, with the old clothes of his father. He was generally seen trooping like a colt at his mother’s heels, equipped in a pair of his father’s cast-off galligaskins, which he had much ado to hold up with one hand, as a fine lady does her train in bad weather.Rip Van Winkle, however, was one of those happy mortals, of foolish, well-oiled dispositions, who take the world easy, eat white bread or brown, whichever can be got with least thought or trouble, and would rather starve on a penny than work for a pound. If left to himself, he would have whistled life away, in perfect contentment; but his wife kept continually dinning in his ears about his idleness, his carelessness, and the ruin he was bringing on his family. Morning, noon, and night, her tongue was incessantly going, and everything he said or did was sure to produce a torrent of household eloquence. Rip had but one way of replying to all lectures of the kind, and that, by frequent use, had grown into a habit. He shrugged his shoulders, shook his head, cast up his eyes, but said nothing. This, however, always provoked a fresh volley from his wife, so that he was fain to draw off his forces, and take to the outside of the house—the only side which, in truth, belongs to a henpecked husband.Rip’s sole domestic adherent was his dog Wolf, who was as much henpecked as his master; for Dame Van Winkle regarded them as companions in idleness, and even looked upon Wolf with an evil eye, as the cause of his master’s so often going astray. True it is, in all points of spirit befitting an honorable dog, he was as courageous an animal as ever scoured the woods—but what courage can withstand the ever-during and all-besetting terrors of a woman’s tongue? The moment Wolf entered the house his crest fell, his tail drooped to the ground, or curled between his legs; he sneaked about with a gallows air, casting many a sidelong glance at Dame Van Winkle, and at the least flourish of a broomstick or ladle would fly to the door with yelping precipitation.Times grew worse and worse with Rip Van Winkle as years of matrimony rolled on; a tart temper never mellows with age, and a sharp tongue is the only edged tool that grows keener by constant use. For a long while he used to console himself, when driven from home, by frequenting a kind of perpetual club of the sages, philosophers, and other idle personages of the village, which held its sessions on a bench before a small inn, designated by a rubicund portrait of his majesty George the Third. Here they used to sit in the shade, of a long lazy summer’s day, talking listlessly over village gossip, or telling endless sleepy stories about nothing. But it would have been worth any statesman’s money to have heard the profound discussions which sometimes took place, when by chance an old newspaper fell into their hands, from some passing traveler. How solemnly they would listen to the contents, as drawled out by Derrick Van Bummel, the schoolmaster, a dapper, learned little man, who was not to be daunted by the most gigantic word in the dictionary; and how sagely they would deliberate upon public events some months after they had taken place.The opinions of this junto were completely controlled by Nicholas Vedder, a patriarch of the village, and landlord of the inn, at the door of which he took his seat from morning till night, just moving sufficiently to avoid the sun, and keep in the shade of a large tree; so that the neighbors could tell the hour by his movements as accurately as by a sun-dial. It is true, he was rarely heard to speak, but smoked his pipe incessantly. His adherents, however (for every great man has his adherents), perfectly understood him, and knew how to gather his opinions. When anything that was read or related displeased him, he was observed to smoke his pipe vehemently, and send forth short, frequent, and angry puffs; but when pleased, he would inhale the smoke slowly and tranquilly, and emit it in light and placid clouds, and sometimes taking the pipe from his mouth, and letting the fragrant vapor curl about his nose, would gravely nod his head in token of perfect approbation.From even this stronghold the unlucky Rip was at length routed by his termagant wife, who would suddenly break in upon the tranquillity of the assemblage, and call the members all to nought; nor was that august personage, Nicholas Vedder himself, sacred from the daring tongue of this terrible virago, who charged him outright with encouraging her husband in habits of idleness.Poor Rip was at last reduced almost to despair; and his only alternative, to escape from the labor of the farm and clamor of his wife, was to take gun in hand and stroll away into the woods. Here he would sometimes seat himself at the foot of a tree, andshare the contents of his wallet with Wolf, with whom he sympathized as a fellow-sufferer in persecution. “Poor Wolf,” he would say, “thy mistress leads thee a dog’s life of it; but never mind, my lad, while I live thou shalt never want a friend to stand by thee!” Wolf would wag his tail, look wistfully in his master’s face, and if dogs can feel pity, I verily believe he reciprocated the sentiment with all his heart.In a long ramble of the kind on a fine autumnal day, Rip had unconsciously scrambled to one of the highest parts of the Catskill Mountains. He was after his favorite sport of squirrel shooting, and the still solitudes had echoed and reëchoed with the reports of his gun. Panting and fatigued, he threw himself, late in the afternoon, on a green knoll, covered with mountain herbage, that crowned the brow of a precipice. From an opening between the trees he could overlook all the lower country for many a mile of rich woodland. He saw at a distance the lordly Hudson, far, far below him, moving on its silent but majestic course, the reflection of a purple cloud, or the sail of a lagging bark, here and there sleeping on its glassy bosom, and at last losing itself in the blue highlands.On the other side he looked down into a deep mountain glen, wild, lonely, and shagged, the bottom filled with fragments from the impending cliffs, and scarcely lighted by the reflected rays of the setting sun. For some time Rip lay musing on this scene; evening was gradually advancing; the mountains began to throw their long blue shadows over the valleys; he saw that it would be dark long before he could reach the village, and he heaved a heavy sigh when he thought of encountering the terrors of Dame Van Winkle.As he was about to descend, he heard a voice from a distance, hallooing, “Rip Van Winkle! Rip Van Winkle!” He looked around, but could see nothing but a crow winging its solitary flight across the mountain. He thought his fancy must have deceived him, and turned again to descend, when he heard the same cry ring through the still evening air: “Rip Van Winkle! Rip Van Winkle!”—at the same time Wolf bristled up his back, and giving a low growl, skulked to his master’s side, looking fearfully down into the glen. Rip now felt a vague apprehension stealing over him; he looked anxiously in the same direction, and perceived a strange figure slowly toiling up the rocks, and bending under the weight of something he carried on his back. He was surprised to see any human being in this lonely and unfrequented place, but supposing it to be some one of the neighborhood in need of assistance, he hastened down to yield it.On nearer approach, he was still more surprised at the singularity of the stranger’s appearance. He was a short, square-built old fellow, with thick bushy hair, and a grizzled beard. His dress was of the antique Dutch fashion—a cloth jerkin strapped around the waist—several pair of breeches, the outer one of ample volume, decorated with rows of buttons down the sides, and bunches at the knees. He bore on his shoulders a stout keg, that seemed full of liquor, and made signs for Rip to approach and assist him with the load. Though rather shy and distrustful of this new acquaintance, Rip complied with his usual alacrity, and mutually relieving one another, they clambered up a narrow gully, apparently the dry bed of a mountain torrent. As they ascended, Rip every now and then heard long rolling peals, likedistant thunder, that seemed to issue out of a deep ravine, or rather cleft between lofty rocks, toward which their rugged path conducted. He paused for an instant, but supposing it to be the muttering of one of those transient thunder showers which often take place in mountain heights, he proceeded. Passing through the ravine, they came to a hollow, like a small amphitheater, surrounded by perpendicular precipices, over the brinks of which impending trees shot their branches, so that you only caught glimpses of the azure sky and the bright evening cloud. During the whole time, Rip and his companion had labored on in silence; for though the former marveled greatly what could be the object of carrying a keg of liquor up this wild mountain, yet there was something strange and incomprehensible about the unknown that inspired awe and checked familiarity.On entering the amphitheater, new objects of wonder presented themselves. On a level spot in the center was a company of odd-looking personages playing at ninepins. They were dressed in a quaint, outlandish fashion: some wore short doublets, others jerkins, with long knives in their belts, and most had enormous breeches, of similar style with that of the guide’s. Their visages, too, were peculiar: one had a large head, broad face, and small, piggish eyes; the face of another seemed to consist entirely of nose, and was surmounted by a white sugar-loaf hat set off with a little red cock’s tail. They all had beards, of various shapes and colors. There was one who seemed to be the commander. He was a stout old gentleman, with a weather-beaten countenance; he wore a laced doublet, broad belt and hanger, high-crowned hat and feather, red stockings, and high-heeled shoes, with roses in them. The whole group reminded Rip of the figures in an old Flemish painting, in the parlor of Dominie Van Schaick, the village parson, and which had been brought over from Holland at the time of the settlement.What seemed particularly odd to Rip, was that though these folks were evidently amusing themselves, yet they maintained the gravest faces, the most mysterious silence, and were, withal, the most melancholy party of pleasure he had ever witnessed. Nothing interrupted the stillness of the scene but the noise of the balls, which, whenever they were rolled, echoed along the mountains like rumbling peals of thunder.As Rip and his companion approached them, they suddenly desisted from their play, and stared at him with such fixed statue-like gaze, and such strange, uncouth, lack-luster countenances, that his heart turned within him, and his knees smote together. His companion now emptied the contents of the keg into large flagons, and made signs to him to wait upon the company. He obeyed with fear and trembling; they quaffed the liquor in profound silence, and then returned to their game.By degrees, Rip’s awe and apprehension subsided. He even ventured, when no eye was fixed upon him, to taste the beverage, which he found had much of the flavor of excellent Hollands. He was naturally a thirsty soul, and was soon tempted to repeat the draught. One taste provoked another, and he reiterated his visits to the flagon so often, that at length his senses were overpowered, his eyes swam in his head, his head gradually declined, and he fell into a deep sleep.On awaking, he found himself on the green knoll from whence he had first seenthe old man of the glen. He rubbed his eyes—it was a bright sunny morning. The birds were hopping and twittering among the bushes, and the eagle was wheeling aloft and breasting the pure mountain breeze. “Surely,” thought Rip, “I have not slept here all night.” He recalled the occurrences before he fell asleep. The strange man with a keg of liquor—the mountain ravine—the wild retreat among the rocks—the woe-begone party at ninepins—the flagon—“Oh! that flagon! that wicked flagon!” thought Rip—“what excuse shall I make to Dame Van Winkle?”He looked round for his gun, but in place of the clean, well-oiled fowling piece, he found an old firelock lying by him, the barrel incrusted with rust, the lock falling off, and the stock worm-eaten. He now suspected that the grave roysters of the mountain had put a trick upon him, and having dosed him with liquor, had robbed him of his gun. Wolf, too, had disappeared, but he might have strayed away after a squirrel or partridge. He whistled after him, shouted his name, but all in vain; the echoes repeated his whistle and shout, but no dog was to be seen.He determined to revisit the scene of the last evening’s gambol, and if he met with any of the party, to demand his dog and gun. As he rose to walk, he found himself stiff in the joints, and wanting in his usual activity. “These mountain beds do not agree with me,” thought Rip, “and if this frolic should lay me up with a fit of the rheumatism, I shall have a blessed time wit h Dame Van Winkle.” With some difficulty he got down into the glen; he found the gully up which he and his companion had ascended the preceding evening; but to his astonishment a mountain stream was now foaming down it, leaping from rock to rock, and filling the glen with babbling murmurs. He, however, made shift to scramble up its sides, working his toilsome way through thickets of birch, sassafras, and witch-hazel, and sometimes tripped up or entangled by the wild grape vines that twisted their coils and tendrils from tree to tree, and spread a kind of network in his path.At length he reached to where the ravine had opened through the cliffs to the amphitheater; but no traces of such opening remained. The rocks presented a high, impenetrable wall, over which the torrent came tumbling in a sheet of feathery foam, and fell into a broad, deep basin, black from the shadows of the surrounding forest. Here, then, poor Rip was brought to a stand. He again called and whistled after his dog; he was only answered by the cawing of a flock of idle crows, sporting high in air about a dry tree that overhung a sunny precipice; and who, secure in their elevation, seemed to look down and scoff at the poor man’s perplexities. What was to be done? the morning was passing away, and Rip felt famished for want of his breakfast. He grieved to give up his dog and gun; he dreaded to meet his wife; but it would not do to starve among the mountains. He shook his head, shouldered the rusty firelock, and, with a heart full of trouble and anxiety, turned his steps homeward.As he approached the village, he met a number of people, but none whom he knew, which somewhat surprised him, for he had thought himself acquainted with every one in the country round. Their dress, too, was of a different fashion from that to which he was accustomed. They all stared at him with equal marks of surprise, and whenever they cast their eyes upon him, invariably stroked their chins. The constant recurrence of this gesture induced Rip, involuntarily, to do the same, when, to hisastonishment, he found his beard had grown a foot long!He had now entered the skirts of the village. A troop of strange children ran at his heels, hooting after him, and pointing at his gray beard. The dogs, too, none of which he recognized for his old acquaintances, barked at him as he passed. The very village was altered: it was larger and more populous. There were rows of houses which he had never seen before, and those which had been his familiar haunts had disappeared. Strange names were over the doors—strange faces at the windows—everything was strange. His mind now began to misgive him; he doubted whether both he and the world around him were not bewitched. Surely this was his native village, which he had left but the day before. There stood the Catskill Mountains—there ran the silver Hudson at a distance—there was every hill and dale precisely as it had always been—Rip was sorely perplexed—“That flagon last night,” thought he, “has addled my poor head sadly!”It was with some difficulty he found the way to his own house, which he approached with silent awe, expecting every moment to hear the shrill voice of Dame Van Winkle. He found the house gone to decay—the roof fallen in, the windows shattered, and the doors off the hinges. A half-starved dog, that looked like Wolf, was skulking about it. Rip called him by name, but the cur snarled, showed his teeth, and passed on. This was an unkind cut indeed—“My very dog,” sighed poor Rip, “has forgotten me!”He entered the house, which, to tell the truth, Dame Van Winkle had always kept in neat order. It was empty, forlorn, and apparently abandoned. This desolateness overcame all his connubial fears—he called loudly for his wife and children—the lonely chambers rung for a moment with his voice, and then all again was silence.He now hurried forth, and hastened to his old resort, the little village inn—but it too was gone. A large rickety wooden building stood in its place, with great gaping windows, some of them broken, and mended with old hats and petticoats, and over the door was painted, “The Union Hotel, by Jonathan Doolittle.” Instead of the great tree which used to shelter the quiet little Dutch inn of yore, there now was reared a tall naked pole, with something on the top that looked like a red nightcap, and from it was fluttering a flag, on which was a singular assemblage of stars and stripes—all this was strange and incomprehensible. He recognized on the sign, however, the ruby face of King George, under which he had smoked so many a peaceful pipe, but even this was singularly metamorphosed. The red coat was changed for one of blue and buff, a sword was stuck in the hand instead of a scepter, the head was decorated with a cocked hat, and underneath was painted in large characters, G ENERAL W ASHINGTON.There was, as usual, a crowd of folk about the door, but none whom Rip recollected. The very character of the people seemed changed. There was a busy, bustling, disputatious tone about it, instead of the accustomed phlegm and drowsy tranquillity. He looked in vain for the sage Nicholas Vedder, with his broad face, double chin, and fair long pipe, uttering clouds of tobacco smoke instead of idle speeches; or Van Bummel, the schoolmaster, doling forth the contents of an ancient newspaper. In place of these, a lean, bilious-looking fellow, with his pockets full of handbills, was haranguing vehemently about rights of citizens—election—membersof Congress—liberty—Bunker’s Hill—heroes of ’76—and other words, that were a perfect Babylonish jargon to the bewildered Van Winkle.The appearance of Rip, with his long grizzled beard, his rusty fowling piece, his uncouth dress, and the army of women and children that had gathered at his heels, soon attracted the attention of the tavern politicians. They crowded around him, eying him from head to foot, with great curiosity. The orator bustled up to him, and drawing him partly aside, inquired “on which side he voted?” Rip stared in vacant stupidity. Another short but busy little fellow pulled him by the arm, and raising on tiptoe, inquired in his ear, “whether he was Federal or Democrat.” Rip was equally at a loss to comprehend the question; when a knowing, self-important old gentleman, in a sharp cocked hat, made his way through the crowd, putting them to the right and left with his elbows as he passed, and planting himself before Van Winkle, with one arm akimbo, the other resting on his cane, his keen eyes and sharp hat penetrating, as it were, into his very soul, demanded, in an austere tone, “what brought him to the election with a gun on his shoulder, and a mob at his heels, and whether he meant to breed a riot in the village?” “Alas! gentlemen,” cried Rip, somewhat dismayed, “I am a poor quiet man, a native of the place, and a loyal subject of the king, God bless him!”Here a general shout burst from the bystanders—“A Tory! a Tory! a spy! a refugee! hustle him! away with him!” It was with great difficulty that the self-important man in the cocked hat restored order; and having assumed a tenfold austerity of brow, demanded again of the unknown culprit, what he came there for, and whom he was seeking. The poor man humbly assured him that he meant no harm; but merely came there in search of some of his neighbors, who used to keep about the tavern.“Well—who are they?—name them.”Rip bethought himself a moment, and then inquired, “Where’s Nicholas Vedder?”There was silence for a little while, when an old man replied in a thin, piping voice, “Nicholas Vedder? why, he is dead and gone these eighteen years! There was a wooden tombstone in the churchyard that used to tell all about him, but that’s rotted and gone, too.”“Where’s Brom Dutcher?”“Oh, he went off to the army in the beginning of the war; some say he was killed at the battle of Stony Point—others say he was drowned in a squall, at the foot of Antony’s Nose. I don’t know—he never came back again.”“Where’s Van Bummel, the schoolmaster?”“He went off to the wars, too, was a great militia general, and is now in Congress.”Rip’s heart died away, at hearing of these sad changes in his home and friends, and finding himself thus alone in the world. Every answer puzzled him, too, by treating of such enormous lapses of time, and of matters which he could not understand: war—Congress—Stony Point!—he had no courage to ask after any more friends, but cried out in despair, “Does nobody here know Rip Van Winkle?”。
Dame Van Winkle is described as a captious, man-eating woman who always scolds her husband in this story. But for me, Mrs. Winkle is a brave laborious woman As a villain, she makes Rip Van Winkle’s image of a “simple, good-natured man” more clear, and she is the carrier of the prejudice of women in that society. So in my opinion this story does carry sexual prejudice.Dame van winkle is a typical hellcat according to the description in the story. She always taxes with her husband volubly and acting very shrewish. Form the description of Rip as “a kind neighbor, and a husband who obeyed his wife” in the beginning if the story, we can see that in rip’s family, the person who role the roast is Dame Van Winkle and she controls her husband with her power. With this description, our first expression of Mrs. Winkle is that she is a domineering woman. When we read the sentence:”her tongue was endlessly going. Everything he said or did was sure to produce more angry talk.”we can get the image that Dame Van winkle is sharp-tongued and fractious. As the development of the plot, the author portrayed a picture that Mrs. Winkle break into the club to blame all the people about their worthlessness and idleness.After reading all these evidence above, it is easy for us to build up the expression that dame van winkle is a really virago in the small village. But if we read deeply into the story we can find that this kind of image is carrying a lot of prejudice. Mrs. Winkle is a special woman and she is brave and hardworking. The story tells us that rip is a kind and easy-going man, when his wife blames him, he never talk back. At the same time, the author also write that “Rip Van Winkle had one great fault; he disliked---indeed, he hated---any kind of profitable labour.” The condition of his farm is worse than any of his neighbors’but rip is still wondering in the woods or lazing away with the people in the club insteadof doing farm work. It means that as a man who should work and earn money to support his family, rip is a total failure. Then we will ask who is working to take care of the family? Of cause the answer is dame van winkle. Since the husband never takes his responsibility, the wife has to go out working like a man, do the entire house work and bring up the children. In the story when rip got back to his village, there is a sentence: “He entered the ruins of the house, which, to tell the truth, Dame Van Winkle had always kept in good order.” This means that Mrs. Winkle is a good housewife.Dame Van winkle is fractious and captious, but she has to be such a virago because her husband is a dawdler who never takes his responsibility. In the years that are described in the story, all the judgments about women are made by the men. A man who is always wondering and chatting with others can be forgiven and accepted by the public, but a woman who is brave to point out the worthlessness and idleness of men will be called a virago and the public will turn its back on her. From the story we can see that the people in Rip’s vi llage are described as:” Whenever they discussed the Van Winkle family's quarrels, they always decided that Dame Van Winkle was wrong.” And there are a lot of fainéant in the village, especially in the inn and these people’s wives must have compliant, but these women just choose to keep silent and comply. Only Dame Van Winkle has the courage to speak out. She not only blames her own husband but also censures the people who always connive these pokes. To my way of thinking, dame van winkle is a brave woman who is not afraid of speaking out her compliant in the patriarchal society.As a villain, Mrs. Winkle’s negative image helps the author to make Rip as the victim of a terrible wife. At the beginning of the story the author described Rip as a nice, easy-going man and everyone in the village likes him except of his wife. He is scolded often by often but never dareto fight back. The worse Mrs. Winkle is described, the pitiful Rip is considered. By this way, the story successfully convinced the readers to believe that a good woman should be quiet and submissive; they should never challenge the domination of men. Mrs. Winkle is a good carrier of the negative opinion of a powerful and brave woman that was hold by men.This story dose carries the sexual prejudice of women. First, the name of Mrs. Winkle is ironical. The word “dame” is a title for noble women but Mrs. Winkle is just a countrywoman who has no connection with a noble woman. The author here is using this word to show his sarcasm of women. Second, the reason for us to take Mrs. Winkle as a virago is that the adjectives and sentences that used by the author to describe Dame Van Winkle are all negative. Such as “what dog is ever brave enough to stand firm against the terrors of a woman's tongue?”and “Morn ing, noon, and night, her tongue was endlessly going.”Thirdly, the author never tries to describe details about Mrs. Winkle or any other women in this story. We only know her name and her typical image is a virago. This shows the author’s attitude towards women: ignore and depreciate. The same attitude can be seen from the depiction of Mrs. Winkle’s death:” She broke a blood vessel in anger at a man who came selling things at our door." This cause of death for Dame Van Winkle is like a joke, while at the end Rip gets a family and becomes the respectful old man in the village, his story is told once by once. With these evidences above we can see that the story carries sexual prejudice.As a conclusion, Dame Van Winkle is a brave, hardworking and respectful woman; she is described as a virago because the author wanted to show the readers the rule for women in the patriarchal society. So the story obviously has sexual prejudice.。
华盛顿·欧文是美国早期浪漫主义文学的代表,被誉为“美国文学之父”,是第一个为美国文学赢得欧洲乃至世界声誉的作家。
在作品中,欧文常常把美国的现实状况与欧洲的历史传说融合在一起,展现了一幅幅生动的画面。
《瑞普·凡·温克尔》是《见闻札记》中很有特色的一篇。
该小说以哈得逊河流域的一个小村子背景,讲述了一个神奇的故事:主人公瑞普·凡·温克尔脾气温和,天性懒惰,不事生产,“什么赚钱的活儿他都不喜欢,甚至是憎恨。
”经常遭到妻子的责备数落。
为逃避妻子的唠叨,他经常带着猎枪和狗到山中去打猎.一天,瑞普在山中遇到一群古怪的老人在玩九木桩(some odd-looking personage playing at ninepins)游戏.贪杯的瑞普·凡·温克尔偷饮了古怪老人的仙酒后酣然入睡(fell into a deep sleep)。
等他一觉醒来回到村子时,却惊奇的发现村里发生了天翻地覆的变化。
村子比以前大了;老朋友死于一场战争或者去了别的地方;妻子已经过世。
孩子们都已长大成人;睡觉前他还是乔治王的臣民,现在竟成了美利坚合众国的公民-—原来他一睡就是20年。
在我看来,瑞普·凡·温克尔是个矛盾的人物形象。
一方面他虽然担负着养家糊口的责任,却一切有好处的劳动都深恶痛绝。
因此,瑞普家的田地是最糟糕的,杂草丛生,篱笆倒塌,牲畜乱跑,家人仅靠一小块玉米和马铃薯地勉强生活.即便这样,懒惰的瑞普也不为所动,依旧无所事事、不事耕耘。
另一方面,瑞普这个对自家的农活儿
不理不睬的大懒汉,却一反常态地对帮助邻居表现出极大的积极性。
比如.无论参加村里剥玉米垒石墙的劳动。
还是给农妇们跑腿打杂,瑞普都有求必应.任劳任怨,乐而不疲。
通过明显的对比体现出了瑞普·凡·温克尔是个惧怕承担家庭责任的胆小鬼,永远长不大的小孩子。
其次,该作品采取对不同人物的描写以及采取不同视角的对人物的刻画,为读者描绘出一幅美国革命前的乡村美景.最后,该作品对女性的描写存在一定的鄙视,对瑞普妻子的描写时,所用的词语“火辣”,“泼辣”等贬义词,而对文中男性的描写采用的多为褒义词或中性词.如“可怜的"“高明的”等等。
这些描写的鲜明对比,暗示了作者对女性不平等的态度。
Washington irving is a representative of the early American romantic literature,is known as the ”Father of American Literature",He was the first to win the European American literature and even world reputation as a writer。
In his works, Irving was often take the reality of the United States associated with the European historical legends , So formed a vivid picture.Rip van Winkle is ”Geoffrey crayon” in an article has distinguishing feature very much.
The novel to a small village of the Hudson River valley background, tells a magical story: the protagonist Rip Van Winkel was a simple,good—natured man. He was,moreover,nature is lazy and doesn’t like producing。
”what make money work he doesn't like it, or even hatred.” So he often blame scolded by his wife。
To escape his wife's nagging, he often to the mountains to go hunting with a shotgun and dog。
One day, Pip’s encountered some odd-looking personages playing at ninepins。
Drink Rip’s steal the fairy of the strange old man the drink and falls asleep。
When he woke up to come back to the village, but was amazed to see that changed in the village. The village is large than before,Old friend died in a war or go somewhere else,His wife has died,The children have grown up。
He is king George subjects before sleep,now become citizens of the United States of America —A originally he sleep for 20 years.
In my opinion,Rip’s is a contradictory character. On the one hand, Although he is laden with responsibility for the breadwinner, but hatred work。
So Rip’s fields is one of the worst,family only on a small piece of corn and potato to life. Even so, Rip’s still lazy and nothing to do.On the other hand,Rip’s hatred work,but he verykeen to help neighbors。
Though distinct to this reflects that he is a kind,but afraid of family responsibility。
The Second, the works adopts the description of different characters and different angle of view of the character portrait, painted a beautiful picture before the American revolution of the countryside。
Finally, the works has certain contempt on portraying the lives of women, for his wife's winkle description, the word ”hot", "provocative", a d erogatory term for the male uses mostly positive or neutral. Such
as ”poor” "smart" and so on。
The description of striking contrast,suggested that the author's attitude toward women are not equal.。