员工激励机制外文翻译文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译)
原文：
Performance Appraisal as a Guide for Training and Development: A Research Note on the Iowa Performance Evaluation System
By Dennis Daley owa State University
This paper examines one facet of performance appraisal-its use as a guide for the drafting of employee training and development plans. The scope is limited in that it excludes any consideration as to whether these plans are actually implemented. Our interest focuses only on the extent to which supervisors endeavor to assist employees in correcting or
overcoming weaknesses and in enhancing or developing perceived strengths. The findings reported here are based on a 1981 monitoring of the performance appraisal system used by the State of Iowa.
As civil service reform has been instituted in one jurisdiction after another in order to further assure objective, performance based personnel practices, performance appraisal has emerged as one of the key issues in the personnel management of the 1980s. This heightened sense of importance and seriousness has, in turn, led to a renewed interest in the study of the actual workings of performance appraisal systems.
The uses to which performance appraisal can be put are myriad. The recent Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 serves as a model in this respect. Here we find enunciated what may be taken as the typical orientation toward the uses of performance appraisal, recommending that personnel managers and supervisors "use the results of performance appraisal as. a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees." Performance appraisal systems can also serve to validate personnel testing and selection procedures, although such systems are themselves also subject to affirmative action validation requirements.
The economic recessions of the 1970s and 1980s have placed significant restraints on these uses, however. The imposition of hiring freezes, the diminishment of promotional opportunities, the advent of reductions-in-force, and the near abandonment of merit pay provisions by financially strapped governmental entities have contributed to the loss of enthusiasm for performance appraisal in many quarters. Under such circumstances, performance appraisal一limited in its use to the more negative functions of employee evaluation-takes on the dreaded image ascribed to them by Douglas McGregor (1957).
In their search to salvage something positive from amidst these
circumstances personnel specialists have alighted upon the use of performance appraisal as a guide for employee training and development. This offers them the opportunity of providing public employees with a service that employees view as beneficial. Although public employees have shown little confidence in specific performance appraisal systems or in the managerial abilities of those responsible for their implementation (McGregor, 1957; Levinson, 1976; Nalbandian,1981), they have tended to demonstrate a more favorable attitude when the purpose of performance appraisal has been perceived to be employee development (Decotiis and Petit, 1978;Cascio, 1982).
This, of course, still poses a significant problem to a multipurpose system such as that found in the State of Iowa. Disenchantment or distrust with one aspect of the performance appraisal system may significantly contribute to the weakening of the entire evaluation system.
THE IOWA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
In all public service systems employees are evaluated periodically; most often this is done informally. The introduction of formal systems of performance appraisal, usually in addition to continued informal assessment, is a relatively recent event. Formal systems of performance appraisal are designed to provide a systematic and objective measure of individual job performance and/or potential for development.
Although the use of formal performance appraisal in Iowa can be traced back at least to the early 1950s (limited, for the most part, to such rudimentary methods as the essay or graphic rating scale), these occurred within a fragmented setting. Individual departments and agencies retained descretion over the choice of such personnel practices until well into the 1960s.
Under Governor Harold Hughes (1963一1969) a number of efforts were undertaken to
strengthen the executive. Among these reforms was the creation of the State Merit System of Personnel Administration, administered by the Iowa Merit Employment Department, in 1967. Even so, there were numerous exemptions limiting the extent of its coverage, both in terms of separate merit systems outside its jurisdiction and of patronage appointments. The executive reform movement was continued throughout the lengthy service of Governor Robert Ray (1969-1983). Strong executive support was placed behind the development of the personnel system. Governor Ray unsuccessfully advocated expanding the IMED jurisdiction through the elimination of the existing coverage exemptions and by integrating the separate merit systems into an executive personnel department. Notwithstanding the somewhat 1imited success of recent Iowa governors, the basis for a professionalized public service was established during those years.
One reflection of this basis is the fact that the use of a statewide appraisal-by-objectives system was inaugurated in 1977. The implementation of this system followed the introduction of the management-by-objectives concept among a number of the larger state agencies.Since appraisal-by-objectives is a specific application or extension of the MBO approach, it was felt that by this means executive support for performance appraisal could be more readily obtained. It is known, of course, that the lack of managerial support is a significant contributing factor in the failure of many performance appraisal systems. The Iowa performance evaluation system is an ideal-typical descriptive example of the appraisal-by-objectives technique. The introduction of this approach in 1977 was accompained by a series of training sessions (Burke, 1977) and supported with supervisory and employee handbooks.
However, training for new supervisors and periodic "refresher courses" appear to have been given a low priority in Iowa, as is generally the case in public sector personnel systems. Iowa's use of appraisal-by-objectives is designed as a participatory system. Employee participation is a hallmark found among most modern management approaches and has been linked to successful public sector performance appraisal systems (Lovrich, et al，1981).
The Iowa performance evaluation process is initiated with joint completion of "Section A:Responsibilities and Standards/Results Expected" (also referred to as the "job description")by the supervisor and employee. This is the first of three sections included in the performante appraisal form/process. Section A is completed at the beginning of the annual appraisal period while sections B and C are written up at its conclusion. The employee is to be given prior notice of the conference and supplied copies of previous evaluation for use as guides. Eight to ten major responsibilities (four to five is the norm) are to be selected and， written down in a results-oriented format with specific standards by which the achievement of these results are to be measured. These individual responsibilities are weighted through the use of an additive formula which factors in the time spent on each task and the evaluation of its importance or the consequence of error (a five point Likert-type scale is used for both). The overall employee rating is the weighted average of these individual responsibility ratings(also based on a five point scale).
In the event that these responsibilities need to be subject to modification due to changing circumstances, a new Section A would be prepared by the supervisor and employee. During the course of the evaluation period the supervisor is also encouraged to use a "critical incident" approach. Both formal (with written copy inserted into the
employee's file) and informal communications between employees and supervisors are encouraged. For negative incidents it is important that a record of corrective action be documented; employees must be notified if they are doing something wrong and the supervision must indicate how they can correct their behavior.
At the end of the evaluation period, again following advanced notice, the employee and supervisor meet to discuss the employee's job performance in light of the responsibilities outlined in the employee's Section A. Worksheets are used at this meeting with a formal evaluation prepared only afterward. At this appraisal interview the supervisor discusses "SectionB: Performance Review/Rating" with the employee. Employees are also given the opportunity to formally comment on the final evaluation form. Historically only five percent do so,of which under two percent can be classified as negative comments.
"Section C: Summary of Total Job Performance and Future Performance Plans" is also completed at this time. Basically, this is an essay evaluation. The supervisor is provided the opportunity to list the employee's "areas of strength- and those "areas needing improvement." In the latter instances "training and developmental plans" for correcting these are supposed to be filed.
DATA COLLECTION
In conjunction with its implementation efforts the Iowa Merit Employment Department engaged in a two-year monitoring of its appraisal-by-objectives evaluation system. The results of this monitoring project, involving the sampling of performance appraisals submitted in between July 1978 and December 1979, were reported to state officials in January 1980.The first monitoring project led to a number of minor changes in the performance evaluation system. For most part these
modifications represented "word changes;" e.g., instead of listing"employee weaknesses," "areas needing improvement" were prescribed.
This study is based on the results of a second monitoring project conducted by the IMED.The questions addressed in this study were, in part, raised by the first monitoring project.While the first monitoring focused primarily on the basic or general implementation of the performance evaluation system (i.e., was there compliance with the mandated requirements?), the second is more concerned with how well it is working. The format used here is that of "action research" or "troubleshooting" (Starling, 1979, pp. 495一514; Rossi and Freeman, 1982). IMED staff served as judges who assessed the qualitative aspects of performance appraisals. A stratified approach to sampling was employed in order to assure that sufficient supervisory, professional and managerial appraisals were included. The resultant data base consisted of 535 performance appraisals submitted between July and December of 1981.
DATA ANALYSIS
The primary results assessing how well Iowa's performance appraisal system is working are reported elsewhere (Daley, 1983). This paper focuses only on those aspects related to the specification of training and development plans.
Because Iowa employs a multipurpose approach in the use of performance appraisals it is hardly surprising that there are many instances, 43 percent of those monitored, in which no training and development are specified. This, however, poses the task of somehow separating the cases in which training plans should most definitely be present.
A supervisor may choose to list training and development plans for three reasons. First,unrelated to any individual strengths or weaknesses, he may choose to use this performance appraisal section as a memo or reminder
of a training activity which all employees are routinely given. The inclusion of such activities in an "official" performance appraisal may serve to provide added political weight in order to insure their being performed; it is all to easy amidst the pressing, day-to-day concerns of administrative firefighting to let training and development activities slide off the edge.
Second, supervisors may choose to promote employee development. They may either pickup on some strength an individual already possesses or for which he may have an aptitude and attempt to polish, refine, or enhance those skills. While this is not an automatic relationship, not all "strengths" would require additional or follow-up training, it is important for both organizational and individual well-being. Obviously, such activities benefit the organization by increasing its administrative or technical capacity. One can also expect that the individual employee benefits through material rewards and/or enhanced self-esteem. As such, this represents one of the positive uses to which performance appraisal can be put.Hence, it has an added importance.
Finally, training plans should be specified in those instances in which a supervisor notes that an employee "needs improvement." As such remarks may become the basis for an adverse personnel action (reassignment, reduction in grade, removal, etc.) it is legally incumbent that the state demonstrate that it has made a good faith effort to correct such deficienties. Due process demands that public employees not be dealt with a "star chamber" fashion.An employee cannot be expected to correct inadequate work behaviors if he is neither told that they are inadequate nor, it told, not instructed or assisted in how to correct them.
In monitoring Iowa's performance appraisals room was allowed to record up to three "strengths" and "areas needing improvement" for each employee. Supervisors tended to list employee strengths twice as often as they
detailed areas needing improvement (1223 to 506),and as one would expect there is a pronounced tendency to note both strengths and areas needing improvement vis-a-vis individual employees (58 percent of the monitored appraisals combine both strengths and areas needing improvement).
A count of the number of listed strengths and areas needing improvement was made use of (zero to three for each variable) in analyzing this data. While this fails to measure the importance or significance of each strength or area needing improvement, it was felt that in some way the number of such instances would be related to or a rough indicator of the overall seriousness underlying the specification or training plans (i.e., as the number of instances increased so would the need for a training plan to be specified).
Furthermore, training plans were judged not only as to their existence but also as to whether they were deemed to represent a "poor" or "good" relationship between the plan and the listed strengths and areas needing improvement. The nature of this relationship may also be interpreted in terms of partial or full compliance. "Good" plans would be seen as following-up on the listed strengths and/or areas needing improvement and, hence, as complying with the personnel system's intention to use performance appraisals as a guide for training and development.
In addition to the above analysis the count of strengths and areas needing improvement were also compared to the rounded performance ratings given to each individual. It was felt that there should be evidence here, too, albeit tangential in nature, of a relationship; those employees garnering more mentions of strengths and/or of fewer areas needing improvement should possess higher ratings.
译文：
激励是人力资源管理的核心。
在企业生产经营管理中，人力资源是企业各种经济资源中具有思想、感情、最求和能动性的亦喜爱那个经济资源，也是企业这一有机体的灵魂，因此，人力资源是比其它生产经营资源更为重要的一项资源，它不仅影响和决定了企业其他生产经营经济资源的价值和使用状况，而且其本省就是企业实力几家质量的重要组成部分之一，由于人力资源在企业生产经营经济资源中的地位和作用，所以企业管理工作成效的极致或者说要达到的理想境界的目标应该是：企业内的每一个员工都能将企业的整体利益放在首位，并为企业的目标、利益甘愿贡献自己的一切。职工的这样一种思想和精神状态在宣誓中师很难以体现的，但却是企业家、管理者孜孜以求和所要挑战的极限，要趋近这样的一种状态，只有通过企业内部的有效激励。因此，企业管理工作的重中之重是人力资源管理。
与传统劳动人事管理不同，现代人力资源管理的主要特征表现在“战略性”层面上：（1）在战略指导思想上，现代人力资源管理是“以人为本”的管理；（2）在战略目标上，现代人力资源管理是为了“获取竞争优势”的目标管理；（3）在战略范围上，现代人力资源管理是“全员参加”的民主管理；（4）在战略措施上，现代人力资源管理是运用“系统化科学方法和人文艺术”的权变管理。与非人力资源管理相比较，人力资源管理是通过“激励”来实现的，它是人力资源管理的核心。所谓“激励”，就是从满足人的多层次、多元化需要出发，针对不同员工设定绩效标准和奖励值，一最大限度地激发员工工作积极性和创造性去实现组织的目标。一个企业的人力资源利用效果如何，是由许多复杂因素耦合作用的结果，但其中管理的激励作用是最重要的因素之一。
人力资源不同于其他非人力资源的根本特征就是，它依附于员工的人体而存在，与员工个人须臾不可分离，其他人或组织要使用人力资源，都要经由它的天然所有这个人的“积极主动”配合才能实现。因此，人力资源管理工作能否“以人为本”，有效激发员工的积极性，最大限度地发挥员工的主观能动性和创造性，就成为决定企业生产经营绩效优劣的关键因素和企业人力资源管理成功与否的核心问题。
激励管理有管理激励和制度性激励两种体系。
领导风格外文翻译文献 (文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译) 原文: 1. Introduction The leadership in organizing a government so far has tended to be only one leadership style for all employees’ abilities, namely instruction leadership style, so it has impacted and caused low-level service performance, [1]. An ofiicer’s leadership is no more than as a power figure, who is highly chained by formal rules. So, there is no possibility for appreciations to occur. The implication which occurs toward human resources of employees is that there is a strong tie with formal rules, so there is no room for employees to take initiatives, innovative actions, and to make significant development. Therefore, the time has come for the single-style bureaucratic leadership style orientation to change into the situational leadership style, a style based on situations and conditions of the subordinate/employees’ abilities. Besides the leadership style, the officer’s motivation also plays an important role in achieving high performance because it is related with :
1. 原则之一：激励要因人而异 由于不同员工的需求不同，所以，相同的激励政策起到的激励效果也会不尽相同。即便是同一位员工，在不同的时间或环境下，也会有不同的需求。由于激 励取决于内因，是员工的主观感受，所以，激励要因人而异。 在制定和实施激励政策时，首先要调查清楚每个员工真正需要的是什么。将这 些需要整理、归类，然后来制定相应的激励政策帮助员工满足这些需求。 2. 原则之二：奖励适度 奖励和惩罚不适度都会影响激励效果，同时增加激励成本。奖励过重会使员工 产生骄傲和满足的情绪，失去进一步提高自己的欲望；奖励过轻会起不到激励 效果，或者使员工产生不被重视的感觉。惩罚过重会让员工感到不公，或者失 去对公司的认同，甚至产生怠工或破坏的情绪；惩罚过轻会让员工轻视错误的 严重性，从而可能还会犯同样的错误。 3. 原则之三：公平性 公平性是员工管理中一个很重要的原则，员工感到的任何不公的待遇都会影响 他的工作效率和工作情绪，并且影响激励效果。取得同等成绩的员工，一定要 获得同等层次的奖励；同理，犯同等错误的员工，也应受到同等层次的处罚。 如果做不到这一点，管理者宁可不奖励或者不处罚。 管理者在处理员工问题时，一定要有一种公平的心态，不应有任何的偏见和喜好。虽然某些员工可能让你喜欢，有些你不太喜欢，但在工作中，一定要一视 同仁，不能有任何不公的言语和行为。 1. 激励员工从结果均等转移到机会均等，并努力创造公平竞争环境。 举例来说，吴士宏在IBM从一个打扫卫生的人做起，一步一步到销售业务员， 到地区负责人，到中国区总经理，是什么原因呢？除了个人努力，还应该说 IBM良好的企业文化给了一个发展的舞台，那就是每一个人都有无限的发展机会，只要有能力就会有发展的空间，实现自我，这在很多企业是做不到的，这 种体制无疑会给员工莫大的激励作用。 2. 激励要把握最佳时机。 ——需在目标任务下达前激励的，要提前激励。 ——员工遇到困难，有强烈要求愿望时，给予关怀，及时激励。 3. 激励要公平准确、奖罚分明 ——健全、完善绩效考核制度，做到考核尺度相宜、公平合理。 ——克服有亲有疏的人情风。 ——在提薪、晋级、评奖、评优等涉及员工切身利益热点问题上务求做到公平。 4. 推行职工持股计划。
企业创新战略外文翻译文献(文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译) 翻译之一： Choosing an innovation strategy: theory and practice Author：Joseph T. Gilbert Nationality：America Derivation：Business Horizons, Nov-Dec, 1994 Innovations come as both inventions and adoptions. They come in many types and vary greatly in complexity and scope. Companies attempting to
make a profit cannot continue for long periods without innovating. If they try, their customers will leave them for firms with more up-to-date products or services. It is an observed fact that different companies take different approaches to the use of innovation in attempting to improve their performance. Both academic and practitioner publications in recent years have contained a great deal of writing about innovation, the subjects of which have ranged from comparisons of national patterns of innovation to studies of individual innovations. However, little has been published regarding one issue of both theoretical and practical importance: the innovation policy or strategy of individual firms. Business strategy as a field of study is concerned with how a company competes in its chosen business. It deals with the analysis of a firm's strengths and weaknesses and the opportunities and threats presented by the firm's environment. Strategy looks toward consistent execution of broad plans to achieve certain levels of performance. Innovation strategy determines to what degree and in what way a firm attempts to use innovation to execute its business strategy and improve its performance. To choose an innovation strategy, managers might logically start by thinking about various kinds of innovations and their requirements. We shall discuss three major features of innovation, and analyze each in terms of distinct opposites, even though innovations found in the real world more often appear at various points between these opposites. Innovation is sometimes used in a limited sense to refer only to inventions (products, services, or administrative procedures that no other firm has introduced). More often, however, it applies in a more general sense that includes both invention as described above and imitation (adoption by a firm of a product, service, or administrative procedure that is not an invention but is new to that firm). We use the term in this second sense. Innovations can be characterized in a variety of ways. In the following
The employee’s incentives mechanism in small and medium-sized enterprise Author：Barney J B Abstract："Incentive" is a psychological term, psychologists point out that all behavior is caused by the motivation of associated with it, as one of the person's state of mind, this motive for human behavior has the effect of reinforcement, vertebral move and inspire, known as a motivation. Incentive is mainly to inspire people to inner potential, cause people intelligence, mobilize people's enthusiasm and creativity. In this paper, the construction of small and medium-sized enterprise employees incentive mechanism problem. From the use of different ideas, different angles, for enterprise employees incentive. Staff incentive mechanism is through the system, rational system to reflect the interaction between incentive subjects with incentive object, is the enterprise connect the ideal into reality. Small business managers should learn effective research method for reference, targeted to solve their practical problems, and strive for a breakthrough in terms of theory. In the research and construction of small and medium-sized enterprise incentive mechanism on the road to constantly innovation, divergent thinking, from surface to inside, and realize the goal of research. And summarizes a set of suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises for effective incentive mechanism, to promote the vigorous development of small and medium-sized enterprises. Keywords: small and medium-sized enterprises, incentive mechanism, staff requirements Introduction In the increasingly fierce competition, more and more small and medium-sized enterprises begin to realize enterprise's competition is talented person's competition,actually only attach importance to talents,
沈阳理工大学应用技术学院题目：浅谈华为公司的领导风格 姓名 院（中心、所）经济管理学院 学号 年级2011级 专业工商管理 考试科目组织行为学 考试时间 考试分数 教师签字
目录 摘要···························································· 1.华为公司领导者的介绍 0 2.任正非的领导风格 0 2.1低调 0 2.2狼性精神 (1) 2.3用毛泽东兵法治商 (1) 2.4危机管理理念 (2) 3.任正非的领导秘诀 (2) 3.1“一法”——《华为基本法》——明确的发展纲领·2 3.2“两制”——规范的HR机制、严密的运营机制 (3) 3.3朴实无华的宣教 (3) 4.结束语 (3) 参考文献： (4) 摘要 领导是管理的重要的职能，领导的水平的高低常常决定着组织的生存死亡。领导的有效性是组织成败的关键。领导者身负组织领导的重任，其思想观念、心理素质和特殊心理机制，不仅影响到个人工作的成效，更影响到其部署和群体作用的发挥乃至整个组织的行为绩效。领导的本质是影响力，即对一个组织、一个群体或一些人的行为与观念是施加影响的过程。领导能力意味着影响着团队中成员的发展、留任和激发成员的能力，具有魅力的领导有能力将其自身的价值观与其下属的相统一，他能够影响其下属视其为了集体的利益而舍弃自身的利益。具有魅力的领导，可以激发团队的成员对于团队的项目的热情、发展其忠诚度，建立成
员们的自信和承诺，领导者将成为影响团队效率的楷模。关键词：领导者；华为公司；任正非；领导风格
1.华为公司领导者的介绍 正所谓“上梁不正下梁歪”，作为一个领导者不能起到楷模作用，那么他的下属也只能成为乌合之众，不能有所作为，领导者的领导风格对下属和团队将产生重要的影响。华为公司的创始人任正非出生在贵州的一个贫困的小村庄，任正非虽然生在农村，但他从小就开始接受教育，可谓“贫贱不能移”，任正非凭借着其才能和智慧以及对知识的孜孜不倦的追究，使他进入一个技术密集型行业。1978年，任正非从部队转业，以2万元注册资本创办了深圳华为技术有限公司，现任华为有限公司的总裁。公司主营电信设备，发展迅猛，成为中国市场GSM设备、交换机产品及接入系统的佼佼者。2000年他被美国《福布斯》杂志评选为中国富豪第三位。个人财产估计为5亿美元。2005年他入选《时代周刊》全球“建设者与巨子”100名排行榜，他是中国唯一入选的企业家。同一档为有美国的苹果电脑公司董事长及首席执行官乔布斯、传媒大亨默多克、俄罗斯石油巨头阿布拉莫维奇、2011年任正非以11亿美元首次进入福布斯富豪榜，排名全球第1056名，中国第92名。在《财富》中文版第七次发布中，位居“中国最具影响力的商界领袖”榜单之首。 2.任正非的领导风格 2.1低调 低调的人做有高度的事业。木秀于林，风必摧之，故老子云：“夫唯不争，故天下莫能与之争”，不争者胜天下。任正非深谙这道理，为人处世一向低调。他对各种采访、会议、评选都躲得远远的，不论是直接有利于华为形象的宣传活动，还是政府的活动，或者令许多商界精英趋之若鹜的媒体盛世，他都统统拒绝。他向华为高层发下死命令：“除非重要客户或合作伙伴，其他活动一律免谈，谁来游说我，我就撤谁的职。”人们几乎没有看过他在电视屏幕上登场亮相，也几乎没有听到过他激情的演讲。任正非一贯的追求是“做事业，做有高度的事业”。唯有练好内功，方可与对手论高下。“桃李不言，下自成蹊”,就是这样，也许唯
Human resource management more and more drives value. Under the system that economy development mature, human resource management have to match with fight for the best resources performance, if out of character of the manpower form couples out of character of post, the resources performance be not only whole have no, or may have already exhaust. The modern economy stress balance and match, promote management effect and quality vegetable, will human resource match with make balance, the inside contents establish human resource structure frame, use most in keeping with of the person do most in keeping with of work. Establishment human resource terrace is a communication and collection information way, everyone's opinion comprehensive, give up short take long, with processing salary, welfare etc. affair. Human resource most the importance be a training and development, human resource development have to investment at training aspect, with exertive each stratum of human resource potential. 人力资源管理愈来愈被重视。在经济发展成熟的体系下，人力资源管理必须配合以争取最佳的资源效益，若将不适当的人力配对不适当的职位，资源效益不但全无，或可能有损耗。现代经济讲求平衡及配合，提升管理效能和质素，就要人力资源配合以作平衡，其中的内容是设立人力资源架构框架，用最适合的人做最适合的工作。建立人力资源平台，作为沟通及搜集信息管道，将各方意见综合，舍短取长，以处理薪酬、福利等事宜。人力资源最重要是培训及发展，人力资源发展必须投资在培训方面，以发挥各阶层的人力资源潜能。 发展简史 Generally say, the academic circles development of human resource experience: Personal management, human resource management be recently till now rise of manpower capital management. The main dissimilarity namely lay in the principle that company and business enterprise treat an employee of variety and development. 一般说来，人力资源在学术界的发展经历了：人事管理，人力资源管理，到现在新近兴起的人力资本管理。其主要不同即在于公司和企业对待职员的理念的变化和发展。
营销策略外文翻译文献 (文档含中英文对照即英文原文和中文翻译)
译文: 营销策略 内容提要：为了组织的销售能是成功的，它需要根据一个营销策略计划来帮助保证其努力的目标和宗旨与市场的需要想吻合。营销策略审查市场以确定潜在顾客的需要，竞争者的战略和市场地位，并且尝试制定出一套能使组织在市场上获取或维护竞争优势的相关战略。有一些因素会对营销策略计划的发展造成冲击性的影响，它包括内部因素例如组织的财产、技能和组织文化，外在因素例如各种各样的市场驱动者、市场或产业运作方式、战略窗口和竞争的本质。一个优选的营销策略计划也需具备一套意外情况防备策略以应对市场治理及组织生产能力的不确定性。 关键词：竞争优势竞争策略市场地位市场份额营销销售计划组织文化营销策略 营销策略简述 无论组织的产品或服务多么好，除非它们的价值能被传达给潜在的顾客，否则组织依然无法实现它的使命。这种传达和交流是组织内市场营销功能的职责。根据美国市场协会，营销是“一个组织效能和一套创造过程、交流和传达产品价值给顾客、处理与顾客关系的有益于组织和它的利益共享者的方式”。营销作用包括相辅相成的两方面。营销策略在市场上审查市场来确定潜在顾客和竞争者本质的需要，并且试图开发
出在市场上将使组织获取或维护竞争优势的战略。操作的营销被建立在营销策略作用和贯彻各种各样的计划和策略(包括适当的混合营销的发展)吸引顾客和促进顾客忠实的基础之上的。 产品和服务营销的方法 有很多的方式能用来销售你的产品或服务包括做广告，直接响应、推销活动和宣传。然而，除非你能了解顾客、市场和产业的需要并且竞争的优势和劣势，否则这些方法是不太可能成功的。营销策略帮助一个组织尖化它的焦点和在市场顺利地竞争。营销策略与二个组分有关：目标市场和用最佳的方式传达你的产品价值或服务到那个市场。一个可实行的销售方针的发展取决于几个关键维度。首先，与组织之内的所有全球性战略一样，一个成功的销售方针需要由在组织之内的最高管理层签名。销售方针本质上也具有政治性的色彩：在组织之内的强有力的单位在最佳的销售方针也许不同意，并且协议也许需要谈判达成。销售方针也许受组织文化的也影响，并且那得假定这发生。例如，如果组织总是销售它的装饰物给商业主管，它也许就看不到组织之内的低层人员甚至是成人或少年的个人消费潜力。 实施战略销售计划发展的因素 存在一些能冲击战略销售计划发展的因素，这些因素首先包括组织已经拥有或它可能欣然获取的财产和技能。例如，如果组织拥有一个重大编程的部门，就为它能做和销售应用软件提供了可行性的条件。然而，如果这些人员已经在其他工作介入并且不能自由研究一个新的软件项目，并且组织没能力聘用另外的程序员，起始一条新的软件线是不妥当
全球领导力文献综述与分析 2014年02月25日17:53 来源：《领导科学》(郑州)2012年11(中)期作者：李云飞字号 打印纠错分享推荐浏览量【作者简介】李云飞，天津商业大学F2U合作学院。 一、全球领导力的定义 全球领导力在世界范围内是个热门话题，同传统的领导力一样，始终没有一个被所有人认可的定义。研究全球领导力的专家学者根据各自的经验、不同的文化背景从不同的视角给出了不同的定义。 最初全球领导力的概念是借鉴进而延伸传统的国内领导力而来的(Yeung and Ready，1995)，但是学者们很快意识到由于全球竞争的不定性和多种压力，全球领导力远比国内领导力复杂，这种不定性和压力增加了领导者的工作范围(Weber，1998)。Adler(2001)阐明了这个问题：“全球领导力不同于国内领导力，它涉及人与人之间的相互作用和不同文化之间的观念，而不仅仅是指领导者在本国特定的领导风格的有效性，也不是比较不同国家的不同领导方式……” 有些学者是从跨文化视角定义全球领导力的。Dorfman(2003)将全球领导力定义为一种跨越地理和文化边界的影响，并且这种影响不局限于全球化事物，也不局限于个人及其知识、技能和能力，也不局限于组织中的CEO。Carey等(2004)提出，全球领导力能够跨越地理和文化的边界以激发组织成员共同的愿景、促进合作的决策、适应全球变化浪潮、激励和授权多样化的员工队伍。 Mendenhall(2011)对全球领导者和领导力做了广义的界定：全球领导者是指那些通过建立在相互信任基础上的有效沟通而在组织中产生重大正量改变，在跨界利益相关者、外部权力机构的不同来源，以及在当时复杂的地理和文化条件下建立有效的组织结构和程序的领导者。 基于以上不同的定义，笔者认为，全球领导力概念的核心就是多元化，包括文化、人力资源、地理等。不同范畴的多样化增加了领导力环境的复杂性，因此，有效性成为全球领导力的终极目标。 二、研究历史回顾 领导力的研究在国际上可以追溯到1900年，距今已有100多年的历史了。在1900年至1940年期间，领导力研究致力于挖掘领导者独特的素质，最有代表性的是伟人理论，这个理论强调领袖是天生的，而不是制造的。根据Toyne和Nigh(1997)的研究，20世纪五六十年代国际商务的出现促使学者着手研究不同文化背景下的领导力以及不同文化对领导力的影响，然而这些研究并非当时国际商务研究的主流。 20世纪60年代，有些研究商业管理的学者开始关注管理跨国公司的相关问题，他们的研究促使人们对民族文化本质以及这些文化本质的不同对管理不同国家员工带来的影响有了更深刻的理解，这个研究量规被称作“比较管理”。这些学者把人类学文化框架扩展至商业应用领域，起到了开创性作用(Redding 1997；Schollhammer 1969)。
员工激励机制外文文献 员工激励机制外文文献 有一个国外民意调查组织在研究以往二十年的数据后发现：在所有的工作分类中，员工们都将工资与收益视为最重要或次重要的指标。工资能极大地影响员工行为--在何处工作及是否好好干。 因此，如何让员工从薪酬上得到最大的满意，成为现代企业组织应当努力把握的课题。应该从以下方面把握： 一、为员工提供有竞争力的薪酬，使他们一进门便珍惜这份工作，竭尽全力，把自己的本领都使出来。 支付最高工资的企业最能吸引并且留住人才，尤其是那些出类拔萃的员工。这对于行业内的领先公司，尤其必要。较高的报酬会带来更高的满意度，与之俱来的还有较低的离职率。一个结构合理、管理良好的绩效付酬制度，应能留住优秀的员工，淘汰表现较差的员工。 二、重视内在报酬。 实际上，报酬可以划分为两类：外在的与内在的。外在报酬主要指：组织提供的金钱、津贴和晋升机会，以及来自于同事和上级的认同。而内在报酬是和外在报酬相对而言的，它是基于工作任务本身的报酬，如对工作的胜任感、成就感、责任感、受重视、有影响力、个人成长和富有价值的贡献等。事实上，对于知识型的员工，内在报酬和员工的工作满意感有相当之大的关系。因此，企业组织可以通过工作制度、员工影响力、人力资本流动政策来执行内在报酬，让员工从工作本身中得到最大的满足。 三、把收入和技能挂钩。
建立个人技能评估制度，以雇员的能力为基础确定其薪水，工资标准由技能最低直到最高划分出不同级别。基于技能的制度能在调 换岗位和引入新技术方面带来较大的灵活性，当员工证明自己能够 胜任更高一级工作时，他们所获的报酬也会顺理成章地提高。此外，基于技能的薪资制度还改变了管理的导向，实行按技能付酬后，管 理的重点不再是限制任务指派使其与岗位级别一致，相反，最大限 度地利用员工已有技能将成为新的着重点。这种评估制度最大的好 处是能传递信息使员工关注自身的发展。 四、增强沟通交流。 现在许多公司采用秘密工资制，提薪或奖金发放不公开，使得员工很难判断在报酬与绩效之间是否存在着联系。人们既看不到别人 的报酬，也不了解自己对公司的贡献价值的倾向，这样自然会削弱 制度的激励和满足功能，一种封闭式制度会伤害人们平等的感觉。 而平等，是实现报酬制度满足与激励机制的重要成分之一。 五、参与报酬制度的设计与管理。 国外公司在这方面的实践结果表明：与没有员工参加的绩效付酬制度相比，让员工参与报酬制度的设计与管理常令人满意且能长期 有效。员工对报酬制度设计与管理更多的参与，无疑有助于一个更 适合员工的需要和更符合实际的报酬制度的形成。在参与制度设计 的过程中，针对报酬政策及目的进行沟通、促进管理者与员工之间 的相互信任，这样能使带有缺陷的薪资系统变得更加有效。 六、增加意外性工资收入。 那什么时候你会感到手头宽松、阔绰?拿红包，还是突然得到一 笔奖金，或是股票赚了?--当你有了”额外″或″意外”收入的时候。 员工对薪酬的感觉同样如此。也就是说，当有了″正常收入以外”收入的时候，他们的满意度最高。 因此，管理者千万不要以为付出了一笔高薪就万事大吉，因为规律性不会提高员工对薪酬的满意度--这钱本来就是我该得的!
战略管理研究参考文献 （总目录） 项保华2003-5-31 重要说明：本目录经过多届博士生的共同努力，于2003年5月整理完成，主要提供本人指导的战略管理研究方向的博士生学习参考之用。可以认为，只要通读了本目录的大部分文献，必将能够对战略管理领域的当前及经典理论、方法有比较系统的把握。若能在此基础上潜心感悟，加强与同行的交流探索，定可具备解决具体战略理论与实践问题的创新思路与实用技能，从而顺利完成博士学位论文的选题与撰写。作为战略管理研究方向博士生培养的业务目标定位为，通过对战略理论与实践的系统学习，达到胜任国内重点高等院校战略领域的教学、研究、咨询工作之要求。所以，对于硕士生以及非战略管理研究方向的博士生而言，不作全面通读本目录文献之要求，各位可以根据自己的兴趣，从本目录中选取部分文献阅读，以作为参与战略课程学习之补充。 学习建议：以具体老师为师的范围终有限，而以文献为师则可延请古今中外名家赐教，广泛借鉴吸收多方面的见解。多读、多思、多写，书山无路勤为径，以学为乐恒则成！谨以此与各位共勉！ 1、中文部分 为人经世 ?孔子, 论语（网上下载） ?老子, 道德经（网上下载） ?孙子, 孙子兵法（网上下载） ?马基雅维里（1469-1527）, 君主论, 中国社会出版社, 1999 ?葛拉西安（1601-1658）, 智慧书——永恒的处世经典（网上下载） ?何兆武, 西方哲学精神, 清华大学出版社, 2002 ?墨顿·亨特, 心理学的故事, 海南人民出版社, 1999 ?维克托·E.弗兰克尔, 人生的真谛, 中国对外翻译出版公司, 1994
? E. 迈尔, 生物学思想发展的历史, 四川教育人民出版社, 1990（网上下载） ?威尔逊, 新的综合：社会生物学（李昆峰编译）, 四川人民出版社, 1985（网上下载） 战略总论 ?项保华, 战略管理——艺术与实务（第3版）, 华夏出版社, 2003 ?明茨伯格等, 战略历程：纵览战略管理学派, 机械工业出版社, 2002 ?拜瑞·J·内勒巴夫；亚当·M·布兰登勃格, 合作竞争（Co-Opetition）, 安徽人民出版社, 2000 ?迈克尔·波特, 竞争战略（原著1980年出版）, 华夏出版社, 2003 ?迈克尔·波特, 竞争优势（原著1985年出版）, 华夏出版社, 2003 ?迈克尔·波特, 国家竞争优势（原著1990年出版）, 华夏出版社, 2002 ?迈克尔·波特等, 未来的战略, 四川人民出版社, 2000 ?格里·约翰逊；凯万·斯科尔斯, 公司战略教程, 华夏出版社, 1998 ?小乔治·斯托尔克等, 企业成长战略, 中国人民大学出版社、哈佛商学院出版社, 1999 专题探讨 ?保罗·索尔曼、托马斯·弗利德曼, 企业竞争战略, 中国友谊出版公司, 1985 ?罗伯特·艾克斯罗德, 对策中的制胜之道：合作的进化, 上海人民出版社, 1996 ?约瑟夫·巴达拉克, 界定时刻——两难境地的选择, 经济日报出版社、哈佛商学院出版社, 1998 ?芝加哥大学商学院、欧洲管理学院、密歇根大学商学院、牛津大学赛德商学院, 把握战略：MBA战略精要, 北京大学出版社, 2003 ?哈默尔、普拉哈拉德, 竞争大未来, 昆仑出版社, 1998 ?尼尔·瑞克曼, 合作竞争大未来, 经济管理出版社, 1998 ?卡尔·W.斯特恩、小乔治·斯托克, 公司战略透视, 上海远东出版社, 1999 ?乔尔·布利克、戴维·厄恩斯特, 协作型竞争, 中国大百科全书出版社, 1998
xxxxxxxxx 毕业设计（论文）外文文献翻译 （本科学生用） 题目：Poduct Line Engineering: The State of the Practice 生产线工程：实践的形态 学生姓名：学号： 学部（系）: 专业年级: 指导教师：职称或学位： 2011年3月10日
外文文献翻译（译成中文1000字左右）： 【主要阅读文献不少于5篇，译文后附注文献信息，包括：作者、书名（或论文题目）、出版社（或刊物名称）、出版时间（或刊号）、页码。提供所译外文资料附件（印刷类含封面、封底、目录、翻译部分的复印件等，网站类的请附网址及原文】 Requirements engineering practices A precise requirements engineering process— a main driver for successful software development —is even more important for product line engineering. Usually, the product line’s scope addresses various domains simultaneously. This makes requirements engineering more complex. Furthermore, SPL development involves more tasks than single-product development. Many product line requirements are complex, interlinked, and divided into common and product-specific requirements. So, several requirements engineering practices are important specifically in SPL development: ? Domain identification and modeling, as well as commonalities and variations across product instances Separate specification and verification for platform and product requirements ? Management of integrating future requirements into the platform and products ? Identification, modeling, and management of requirement dependencies The first two practices are specific to SPL engineering. The latter two are common to software development but have much higher importance for SPLs. Issues with performing these additional activities can severely affect the product line’s long-term success. During the investigation, we found that most organizations today apply organizational and procedural measures to master these challenges. The applicability of more formal requirements engineering techniques and tools appeared rather limited, partly because such techniques are not yet designed to cope with product line evelopment’s inherent complexities. The investigation determined that the following three SPL requirements engineering practices were most important to SPL success. Domain analysis and domain description. Before starting SPL development, organizations should perform a thorough domain analysis. A well-understood domain is a prerequisite for defining a suitable scope for the product line. It’s the foundation for efficiently identifying and distinguishing platform and product requirements. Among the five participants in our investigation, three explicitly modeled the product line requirements. The others used experienced architects and domain experts to develop the SPL core assets without extensive requirements elicitation. Two organizations from the first group established a continuous requirements management that maintained links between product line and product instance requirements. The three other organizations managed their core assets’ evolution using change management procedures and versioning concepts. Their business did not force them to maintain more detailed links between the requirements on core assets and product instances. The impact of architectural decisions on requirements negotiations. A stable but flexible architecture is important for SPL development. However, focusing SPL evolution too much on architectural issues will lead to shallow or even incorrect specifications. It can cause core assets to ignore important SPL requirements so that the core assets lose relevance for SPL development. Organizations can avoid this problem by establishing clear responsibilities for requirements management in addition to architectural roles. The work group participants reported that a suitable organizational tool for balancing requirements and architecture is roundtable meetings in which requirements engineers,
一、激励理论的背景 在经济发展的过程中,劳动分工与交易的出现带来了激励问题。激励理论是行为科学中用于处理需要，动机，目标和行为四者之间关系的核心理论。行为科学认为人的动机来自需要，由需要确定人们的行为目标，激励则作用于人内心活动，激发，驱动和强化人的行为。哈佛大学维廉詹姆士研究表明：在没有激励措施下,下属一般仅能发挥工作能力的20%～30%，而当他受到激励后,其工作能力可以提升到80%～90%，所发挥的作用相当于激励前的3到4倍。日本丰田公司采取激励措施鼓励员工提建议，结果仅1983年一年，员工提了165万条建议，平均每人31条，它为公司带来900亿日元利润，相当于当年总利润的18%。由于激励的效果明显，所以各种组织为了提高生产效率，有些专家学者就开始了对激励理论的研究之中，探索激励的无穷潜力。 二、国外研究现状 国外对于激励理论有了大量的研究并获得了丰硕的成果。总体来说，可以分为两类激励理论。一类是以人的心理需求和动机为主要研究对象的激励理论，熟称“内容型激励理论”。另一类是以人的心理过程和行为过程相互作用的动态系统为研究对象的激励过程理论,它也被称作是“行为型激励理论”。 1 内容型激励理论 1.1 奠瑞的人类人格理论 这种理论认为，在面临着动态且不断变化的环境时，人们都是自适应的。它把需求分成了两种类型，即生理需求和心理需求。前者与人体基本生理过程的满足感有关，而后者所关注的是情绪上和精神上的满足感。 1.2 马斯洛的“需要层次”理论 美国心理学家马斯洛(A.H.Maslow)进一步发展了莫瑞的研究，在1954年出版的《动机与人格》一书中对该理论作了进一步的阐释。马斯洛认为人的需要可以划分为五个层次，从低到高依次为生理需要，安全需要，社交需要，尊熏需要，自我实现需要，且这五个层次的顺序，对每个人都是相同的。只有当较低层次的需要获得了基本满足后，下一个较高层次的需要才能成为主导需要。 1.3 赫茨伯格的激励—保健双因素理论 美国心理学家赫茨伯格因素理论打破了这一假设。他于1959年在《工作的激励》一书中提出了保健——激励因素理论，简称双因素理论。即保健因素和激励因素。保健因素可以用来体现高水平员工的不满意，激励因素可以用来体现高水平员工的满意度。他认为只有激励因素才能促发员工积极性,提高生产效率。 2 行为型激励理论 2.1 洛克的目标设置理论 2O世纪6O年代末，埃德温·A·洛克和他的同事们花了许多年的时间研究目标对于人类行为和绩效的效果。他们的研究导致了目标设置理论的创立并不断地得到验证，提出：指向一共同目标的工作意向是工作效率的主要源泉。他还提出了具体的设置目标的步骤。 2.2 亚当斯的公平理论 美国心理学家亚当斯(J.s.Adams)对员工受激励程度的大小与他人之间的关系进行研究，并在《工人关于工资不公平的内心冲突同其生产率的关系》(1962年与罗森合写)，《工