GRE iusse北美范文

24 The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.The speaker suggests that the most effective way to teach others is to praise positive actions while ignoring negative ones. In my view, this statement is too extreme. It overlooks circumstances under which praise might be inappropriate, as well as ignoring the beneficialvalue of constructive criticism, and sometimes even punishment.The recommendation that parents, teachers, and employers praise positive actions is generally good advice. For young children positive reinforcement is critical in the development of healthy self-esteem and self-confidence. For students appropriate positive feedback serves as a motivating force, which spurs them on to greater academic achievement. For employees, appropriately administered praise enhances productivity and employee loyalty, and makes for a more congenial and pleasant work environment overall.While recommending praise for positive actions is fundamentally sound advice, this advice should carry with it certain caveats. First, some employees and older students might fred excessive praise to be patronizing or paternalistic. Secondly, some individuals need and respond more appropriately to praise than others; those administering the praise should be sensitive to the individual's need for positive reinforcement in the fzrst place. Thirdly, praiseshould be administered fairly and evenhandedly. By issuing more praise to one student than to others, a teacher might cause one recipient to be labeled by classmates as teacher's pet, even if the praise is well deserved or badly needed. If the result is to alienate other students, then the praise might not be justified. Similarly, at the workplace a supervisor must be careful to issue praise fairly and evenhandedly, or risk accusations of undue favoritism, or even discrimination.As for ignoring negative actions, I agree that minor peccadilloes can, and in many cases should, be overlooked. Mistakes and other negative actions are often part of the natural learning process. Young children are naturally curious, and parents should not scold their children for every broken plate or precocious act. Otherwise, children do not develop a healthy sense of wonder and curiosity, and will not learn what they must in order to make their own way in the world. Teachers should avoid rebuking or punishing students for faulty reasoning, incorrect responses to questions, and so forth. Otherwise, students might stop trying to learn altogether. And employees who know they are being monitored closely for any sign of errant behavior are likely to be less productive, more resentful of their supervisors, and less loyal to their employers.At the same time, some measure of constructive criticism and critique, and sometimes even punishment, is appropriate. Parents must not turn a blind eye to their child's behavior if it jeopardizes the child's physical safety or the safety of others. Teachers should not ignore behavior that unduly disrupts the learning process; and of course teachers should correct and critique students' class work, homework and tests as needed to help the students learn from their mistakes and avoid repeating them. Finally, employers must not permit employee behavior that amounts to harassment or that otherwise undermines the overall productivity at the workplace. Acquiescence in these sorts of behaviors only serves to sanction them.To sum up, the speaker's dual recommendation is too extreme. Both praise and criticism serve useful purposes in promoting a child's development, a student's education, and an employee's loyalty and productivity. Yet both must be appropriately and evenhandedly 整体评价：1. 文章逻辑清晰，观点鲜明2. 中心段落有4段，稍微有点多，大家在考试场建议3段就可以了；重点是每段的论述内容是否清晰在introduction段，作者改写的题目内容并作出 了清晰的评价主语和谓语相隔太远，大家不要这样写在理论说明阶段，作者列举了3种不同的人，很好，增强了文章的立体感这段话的单词用的很好 尤其是这个patronizing强调了高人一等这样 严重的后果first单词拼写错误思路很好，先说积极行为；再说消极行为；逻辑很清晰 大家可以学习这里有个小问题，就是坐着连续用了两个otherwise，这个逻辑有一些问题；因为这两句话之间并没有转折的关系，改为并列会更好这段内容写的非常好 上面一段说不惩罚的坏处；这段说具体的方式 但是，如果时间有限，这段内容可以不写；文章逻辑已经完整administered; otherwise, they might serve instead to defeat these purposes. 语法点评：1. 整篇文章语法流畅，没有明显的语法失误2. 文章里多次使用了并列结构 -- 结构很好，但是次数有点多3. 单词的使用是本篇文章的亮点。

GRE官方钦定北美GRE满分范文下面是一篇GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文，我们来一起赏析，看看它为何能scored six (先读文章，再看我的点评)The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.北美GRE范文首段This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn\'t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.北美GRE作文范文中间段1The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.北美GRE范文中间段2the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.北美GRE写作范文中间段3Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.北美GRE范文末端In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。

63 There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts —especially at a great cost in money and jobs —to save endangered animal or plant species.What are the limits of our duty to save endangered species from extinction? The statement raises a variety of issues about morality, conscience, self-preservation, and economics. On balance, however, I fundamentally agree with the notion that humans neednot make "extraordinary" efforts--at the expense of money and jobs--to ensure the preservation of any endangered species. As I see it, there are three fundamental arguments for imposing on ourselves at least some responsibility to preserve endangered species. The first has to do culpability. According as dear-cutting of forests or polluting of lakes and streams, we humans have a duty to take affirmative measures to protect the species whose survival we've placed in jeopardy.The second argument has to do with capability. This argument disregards the extent to which we humans might have contributed to the endangerment of a species. Instead, the argument goes, if we are aware of the danger, know what steps are needed to prevent extinction, and can take those steps, then we are morally obligated to help prevent extinction. This argument would place a very high affirmative duty on humans to protect endangered species.The third argument is an appeal to self-preservation. The animal kingdom is an intricatematrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival. Severing certain relationships, such as that between a predator and its natural prey, can set into motion a series of extinctions that ultimately might endanger our own survival asa species. While this claim might sound far-fetched to some, environmental experts assure us that in the long run it is very real possibility. On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is essentially the Darwinian argument that extinctionresults from the inexorable process of so-called “natural selection” in which stronger species survive while weaker ones do not. Moreover, we humans are not exempt from the process. Accordingly, if we see fit to eradicate other species in order to facilitate our survival, then so be it. We are only behaving as animal must, Darwin would no doubt assert.The second argument, and the one that I find most compelling, is an appeal to logic over emotion. It is a scientific fact that thousands of animal species become extinct every year. Many such extinctions are due to natural forces, while others are due to anthropogenic factors.In any event, it is far beyond our ability to save them all. By what standard, then, should we decide which species are worth saving and which ones are not? In my observation, we tend to favor animals with human-like physical characteristics and behaviors. This preference is understandable; after all, dolphins are far more endearing than bugs. But there is no logical justification for such a standard. Accordingly, what makes more sense is to decide based on our own economic self-interest. In other words, the more money and jobs it would cost to save a certain species, the lower priority we should place on doing do.In sum, the issue of endangered-species protection is a complex one, requiring subjective judgments about moral duty and the comparative value of various life forms. Thus, there are no easy or certain answers. Yet it is for this very reason I agree that economic self-作者明确表明论述 的重点是“过多的”这是一个让步段落，来承认确实应该保护濒危物种让步段说的有道理，但是内容太多了，所以大家在考试中不需要写这么多，一段让步内容就够了这个用的很好这段话没有展开具体论述这个用词很到位这段话内容很多，这样说太泛泛on the other hand, 这个词组误用率太高了它是表转折的这段是攻击题目的可行性这句话不够严谨，因为题目里并没有说我们应该牺牲一部分动物来保护其他的物种interest should take precedence over vague notions about moral duty when it comes tosaving endangered species. In the final analysis, at a point when it becomes critical for ourown survival as a species to save certain others, then we humans will do so if we are fit – inaccordance with Darwin’s observed process of natural selection.这篇文章整体观点比较清晰但是一下问题需要注意：1. 让步段篇幅过大2. economic - interests 等这样的抽象名词并没有展开深刻的论述，因此整篇的论点不够insightful3. 没有具体事例的体现 -- 对大部分同学的压力比较大，不要全篇理论论述。

GRE北美Issue范文:知识进步某个程度上体现了政治权威下面为大家介绍了新GRE北美写作范文，主要关于知识进步某个程度上体现了政治权威的相关内容，同学们可适当进行参考，以便更充分地准备GRE考试！更多GRE考试资料，请咨询小马过河GRE频道电话400-0123-267！"Great advances in knowledge necessarily involve the rejection of authority."The speaker claims that great advances in knowledge necessarily involve rejection of authority. To the extent that political authority impedes such advances, I agree with this claim. Otherwise, in my view most advances in knowledge actually embrace certain forms of authority, rather than rejecting authority out of hand.One striking example of how political authority can impede the advancement of knowledge involves what we know about the age and evolution of planet Earth. In earlier centuries the official Church of England called for a literal interpretation of the Bible, according to which the Earth's age is determined to be about 6,000 years. IfWestern thinkers had continued to yield to the ostensible authority of the Church, the fields of structural and historical geology would never have advanced beyond the blind acceptance of this contention as fact.A more modern example of how yielding to political authority can impede the advancement of knowledge involves the Soviet Refusenik movement of the 1920s. During this time period the Soviet government attempted not only to control the direction and the goals of its scientists' research but also to distort the outcome of that research. During the 1920s the Soviet government quashed certain areas of scientific inquiry, destroyed entire research facilities and libraries, and caused the sudden disappearance of many scientists who were engaged in research that the state viewed as a potential threat to its power and authority. Not surprisingly, during this time period no significant advances in scientific knowledge occurred under the auspices of the Soviet government.However, given a political climate that facilitates free thought and honest intellectual inquiry, great advances in knowledge can be made by actually embracing certain forms of "authority." A good example involves modern computer technology. Only by building on, or embracing, certain well-established laws of physics were engineers able to develop silicon-based semi-conductor technology. Although new biotechnology research suggests that organic, biochemical processors will replace artificial semi-conductors as the computers of the future, it would be inappropriate to characterize this leap in knowledge as a rejection of authority.In sum, to the extent that political authority imposes artificial constraints on knowledge, I agree that advances in knowledge might require rejection of authority. Otherwise, in my observation advances in knowledge more typically embrace and build on authoritative scientific principles and laws, and do not require the rejection of any type of authority.小马过河编辑为大家整理了新GRE考试中写作部分的一些素材，主要是一篇北美GRE作文范文，供各位新GRE考生进行参考。

2024年GRE范文精讲：北美GRE范文精讲GRE作为北美地区研究生入学考试之一，是全球多所顶尖大学的研究生入学申请必备考试之一。

在2024年的GRE考试中，各位考生需要掌握的范围不仅包括基础的数学运算和英语语法知识，还需要对一些热门话题有深刻的了解和思考。

本篇文章将帮助各位考生精讲2024年北美GRE范文，希望能够帮助你顺利通过GRE考试。

Issue Essay2024年GRE考试的Issue Essay题目如下："Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Students should take courses such as philosophy, history and literature, regardless of their majors. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?"这个Issue Essay写作题目，主要是考察考生对高等教育的理解和对多元化知识的重视。

以下是一份优秀范文：Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. While students often enter college with a particular major in mind, they may not have a well-rounded education or the necessary skills to succeed in their future careers if they only take classes in their field. Thus, I strongly agree with the statement that a student’s education and training should encompass a range of disciplines, including such subjects as philosophy, history, and literature.First and foremost, a broad array of course work provides students with a more comprehensive worldview. In college courses, students who hold differing viewpoints are often interacting for the first time. The liberal arts classes provide a platform for them todiscuss differences in a respectful manner and gain a perspective on cultures and viewpoints from instructors and classmates who they may never have otherwise met. This will help a student broaden their perspective and will help create well-rounded individuals.Secondly, courses outside a student’s major often have a strong academic connection to that major. For example, philosophy isclosely tied to the field of computer science. In the area ofartificial intelligence, there are significant debates about the ethics of using such technology. Studying philosophy can help computer students understand the responsible ways of practice for technology. Enrolling in various classes may help build specific skills and provide a wider range of knowledge that will be useful in their future careers.Finally, courses outside the student's field of study may challenge them in ways that they had not previously experienced. When a course is introduced, students have to learn new skills and adapt to newmethods. This may increase their science skills by introducing problem-solving methods that are different from those they have been taught to use before. In this way, they are trained and equipped for tackling difficult challenges in real life situations later on.In conclusion, despite the potential of a narrower focus for a specialised major, mandatory coursework outside of the chosen field of study serves to increase the breadth of knowledge, allow for a more integrated prespective on important academic concepts and to also provide an opportunity for students to challenge themselveswith new experiences. Therefore, each student should mandatory take a variety of diverse courses outside of their declared major. Argument Essay2024年GRE考试的Argument Essay题目如下："According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students. Under that system, teachers reported an average of thirty cases of cheating per year. In the first year that the honor code was in place at Groveton, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey, a majority of Groveton students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without. Thus, all colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's in order to decrease cheating among students."这个Argument Essay写作题目，主要是考察考生对“荣誉制度”对于减少学生作弊的看法和理解。

21 Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Some measure of consistency and stability in the law is critical for any society to function. Otherwise, I strongly agree with the speaker's assertion that laws should be flexible enough to adapt to different circumstances, times and places. The lawproperty aptly illustrates this point.On the one hand, a certain measure of consistency, stability, and predictability in our laws is required in order for us to understand our legal obligations and rights as we go about our day-to-day business as a society. For example, in order for private industry to thrive, businesses must be afforded the security of knowing their legal rights and obligations visi-vis employees, federal regulatory agencies, and tax authorities--as well as their contractual rights and duties visi-vis customers and suppliers. Undue uncertainty in any one of these areas would surely have a chilling effect on business. Moreover, some measure of consistency in the legal environment from place to place promotes business expansion as well as interstate and international commerce, all of which are worthwhile endeavors in an increasingly mobilesociety.On the other hand, rigid laws can result in unfairness if applied inflexibly in all places at all times. The framers of the U.S. Constitution recognized the need both for a flexible legal system and for flexible laws--by affording each state legal jurisdiction over all but interstate matters. The framers understood that social and economic problems, as well as standards of equity and fairness, can legitimately change over time and vary from region to region----even from town to town. And our nation's founders would be pleased to see their flexible system that promotes equity and fairness as it operates today. Consider, for example, marital property rights, which vary considerably from state to state, and which have evolved considerably over time as inflexible, and unfair, systems have given way to more flexible, fairer ones. In earlier times husbands owned all property acquired during marriage as well as property brought into the marriage by either spouse. Understandably, this rigid and unfair system ultimately gave way to separate-property systems, which acknowledged property rights of both spouses. More recently certain progressive states have adopted even more flexible, and fairer, "community property" systems, under which eachspouse owns half of all property acquired during the marriage, while each spouse retains a separate-property interest in his or her other property. Yet even these more egalitarian community-property systems can operate unfairly whenever spouses contribute unequally; accordingly, some community-property states are now modifying their systems for even greater flexibility and fairness.Thus, the evolution of state marital-property laws aptly illustrates the virtue of a legal system that allows laws to evolve to keep pace with changing mores, attitudes, and our collective sense of equity. This same example also underscores the point that inflexible laws tend to operate unfairly, and properly give way to more flexible ones--as our nation'sfounders intended.整体评价：1. 作者态度明显 -- 整体同意题目的观点2. 但是在中心段落中有一个段落仅仅是对例子进行了分析；建议大家在写的时候可以添加一个具有总结性的中心句Introduction 的内容比较全面 但是没有必要提及婚姻法，这样和后面的段落内容 会有重复这个内容建议删去这个地方可以写的更加 明确 -- 用下定义的 方式解释：法律约束个人和集体的行为， 规定彼此的义务； 可以有效的维持经济 的平稳发展；同时避免不必要的麻烦由于法律比较抽象，这段内容又没有举例子，所以会影响段落的说服力，建议大家可以举例子，并加以说明 -- 劳动法、妇女权益保护法都可以这个中心句说的很好，但是后面的这个表述 有一定的局限性，仅仅 可以当做一个例子 我们可以说如果过于 僵化，就不能解决 modern society的问题这段可以使用范围拆分 对社会这段可以写对个人 -- 婚姻法是解决人们之间问题的刑法 -- 惩罚新式犯罪大家切记 在考试中，不建议大家例子单独成段，会有失分的风险词汇比较好可以改成values 推荐大家使用语法点评：1. 整篇文章没有使用高大上的句式结构，但是句子长度合理；逻辑表达流畅2. 文章中的单词使用的很到位，尤其是动词和副词，如underscore, aptly; 大家在平时练习中，也可以尝试使用一些描述更为精准的单词。

更多GRE考试培训资料请访问：/gre/页面查看gre作文范文精讲以上即是小编为大家搜索整理的有关gre北美范文总结之科学研究类文章要点知识，希望对大家的gre issue备考有所帮助。

fundamental objectivesand nature of research 研究的基本目标和本性research is the exploration of the unknownfor true answers to our questions, and for lasting solutions to our enduringproblems. Research is also the chief means by which we humans attempt to satisfyour insatiable appetite for knowledge, and our craving to understand ourselvesand the world around us.explore unchartedand unpredictable territory 探索未知和不可预见的领域Indisputably不可否认的 , the many complex technological marvels 科学奇迹 that are significant of our lives are the result ofthe extraordinary cumulative累积的 efforts of ourengineers, entrepreneurs, and others . and such achievements always call forthe courage to risk failing in a large way.A number ofentrepreneurs and engineers today are making the effort to create far simple ,yet more elegant , technologies and applications , which will surely make ourlives far more convenientThe statementbrings immediately to mind the ever-growing and increasingly complex digitalworld.数字世界科学家的研究和科学的进步 401. 贡献取决于? Who is to decidewhich areas of academic inquiry are worthwhile? Scholars cannot be left todecide. nor can regulators and legislators , who would bring to bear their ownquirky notions about what would be worthwhile, and whose susceptibility to influencerenders them untrustworthy in any event.人都擅长自己喜欢的事情By human nature weare motivated to pursue those activities in which we excel. To compel scholarsto focus only on certain areas would waste their true/intellectual talents.Besides , lackinggenuine interest or motivation, a scholar would be unlikely to contributemeaningfully to his or her “assigned ” field of study.History is ladenwith充满 unusual claims by scholars and searchersthat turned out stunningly 极富魅力的 significant –that the sun lies at the center of out universe, thattime and space are relative concepts, that matter consists if discreteparticles, that humans evolved from other life-forms, to name a few.可更换例子当时可能没有用,但是长久以后却有用了The unusualresearch area does not immediately address society’s pressing socialproblems. Yet in the long term, it mightbe necessary to …一定程度上浪费了纳税人的钱Should not allowtheir faculty to indulge their personal intellectual fantasies at taxpayerexpense.Earnest study inthe humanities affords us to know what is best for society, and helps usunderstand and approach societal problems more critically, creatively, andeffectively.科学的发展在于不同的思想Throughout thehuman intellectual history , it is always the different schools of thought thatboost the human scientific and technological progress.科学技术对人类的影响Nowadays ,incredible change in vehicles for transportation and road improvement have madetravel mot only safer but faster and more comfortable as well. High-speed magnetic levitation trains(高速磁悬浮列车) cantransport people safely at speeds of up to 300 miles an hour in parts of Europeand Japan. The Concorde jet can transport people from New York to Londonin less than four hours in luxurious comfort. There have even been spacetourists who have traveled into outer space to the International Space Stationand returned safely to Earth. Not only have the transportation vehiclesthemselves been greatly enhanced, but the highways and railways that thevehicles use have also been tremendously improved. To be in a nutshell, moreplaces than ever befored are now accessible by rapid and reliabletransportation.机器与人类We have devised machines that perform number-crunching and other rote cerebral tasks withgreater accuracy and speed than human minds ever could.Machines have no capacityfor independent thought, for making judgmen ts based on normative considerations,or for developing emotional responses to intellectual problems.Up until now, the notion of human-mademachines that develop the ability to think on their own, and to developso-called "emotional intelligence," has been pure fiction.凭空虚造Yet it seems presumptuousto assert with confidence that humans will alwaysmaintain their superior status over their machines.Recent advances in biotechnology,particularly in the area of human genome research,suggest that within the 21st Century we'll witness machines that can learnto think on their own, to repair and nurture themselves, to experience visceralsensations本体感觉, and soforth.Humans havethe unique capacity for independent thought, subjectivejudgment, and emotional response科学的双面性for every new research breakthrough thathelps reduces human suffering is another that serves to add to that sufferingFor example, while somemight argue that physics researchers who harnessed thepower of the atom have provided us with an alternativesource of energy and invaluable "peace-keepers," thisargument ignored the face that hundreds ofthousands of innocent people murdered and maimedby atomic blasts, and by nuclear meltdowns核泄露. 美军对广岛[Hiroshima]原子弹轰炸Hiroshimawas destroyed in World War II by the first atomic bomb used in warfarein fulfilling the promise of "betterliving through chemistry" research has given uschemical weapons for human slaughter.. Chemical warfare & biologicalwarfare& biochemical warfare研究与投资 31money spent on researchis generally a sound investment because it is an investment in the advancementof human knowledge and in human imagination and spirit.While we must invest in research irrespective ofwhether the results might be controversial, at the same time we should becircumspect about research whoseobjectives are too vague and whose potential benefits are too speculative.比如 moneymight spent toward addressing society's more immediateproblems, such as enhance AIDSawareness and education, and so forth科学”theory” and “fact”when it comes to scienceour wishes and desires ultimately yield to the stubbornness of facts--by whichI mean empirical scientific evidenceand the laws and principles of the physical world. Admittedly,in many cases it is difficult to distinguish between scientific"fact" and mere "theory." History is replete with examples of whatwere considered at one time to be facts, but later disproved as incorrecttheories. Yet it is telling that many such obsolete theories were based on thesubjective inclinations, desires, and wishes of theorists and of the societiesin which the theorists lived. For example, the notions of an Earth-centereduniverse and of linear time and space were both influenced by religiousnotions--that is, by human wishes and passions. As our factual knowledge increased, such theories ultimately giveway.以上即是有关gre issue写作相关知识，大家在备考gre issue写作时可以根据以上内容进行适当的备考。

gre北美范文满分范文下面是一篇GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文，我们来一起赏析，看看它为何能scored six (先读文章，再看我的点评)The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.北美GRE范文首段This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn\'t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.北美GRE作文范文中间段1The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefitanalysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.北美GRE范文中间段2This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.北美GRE写作范文中间段3Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.北美GRE范文末端In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。

57 The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.I concede that basic human nature has not changed over recorded history, and that coming to appreciate this fact by studying history can be beneficial in how we live as a society. However, I disagree with the statement in two respects. First, in other ways there are marked differences between people of different time periods, and learning about those differences can be just as beneficial. Second, studying history carries other equally important benefits aswell.I agree with the statement insofar as through the earnest study of human history we learn that basic human nature---our desires and motives, as well as our fears and foibles---has remained constant over recorded time. And through this realization we can benefit as a society in dealing more effectively with our enduring social problems. History teaches us, for example, that it is a mistake to attempt to legislate morality, because humans by nature resist having their moral choices forced upon them. History also teaches us that our major social ills are here to stay, because they spring from human nature. For instance, crime and violence have troubled almost every society; all manner of reform, prevention, and punishment have been tried with only partial success. Today, the trend appears to be away from reform toward a "tough-on-crime" approach, to no avail. However beneficial it might be to appreciate the unchanging nature of humankind, it is equally beneficial to understand and appreciate significant differences between peoples of different time periods----in terms of cultural mores, customs, values, and ideals. For example, the ways in which societies have treated women, ethnic minorities, animals, and the environment have evolved over the course of human history. Society's attitudes toward artistic expression, literature, and scientific and intellectual inquiry are also in a continual state ofevolution. And, perhaps the most significant sort of cultural evolution involves spiritual beliefs, which have always spun themselves out, albeit uneasily, through clashes between established traditions and more enlightened viewpoints. A heightened awareness of all these aspects of cultural evolution help us formulate informed, reflective, and enlightened values and idealsfor ourselves; and our society dearly benefits as a result.Another problem with the statement is that it undervalues other, equally important benefits of studying history. Learning about the courage and tenacity of history's great explorers, leaders, and other achievers inspires us to similar accomplishments, or at least to face own fears as we travel through life. Learning about the mistakes of past societies helpsus avoid repeating them. For instance, the world is slowly coming to learn by studying history that political states whose authority stems from suppression of individual freedoms invariably fall of their own oppressive weight. And, learning about one's cultural heritage, or roots, fosters a healthy sense of self and cultivates an interest in preserving art, literature, and other cultural artifacts--all of which serve to enrich society.To sum up, history informs us that basic human nature has not changed, and this history lesson can help us understand and be more tolerant of one another, as well as develop compassionate responses to the problems and failings of others. Yet, history has other lessons to offer us as well. It helps us formulate informed values and ideals for ourselves, inspires us to great achievements, points out mistakes to avoid, and helps us appreciate our cultural heritage.这两句话说明 作者要论述的内容重点 是学习历史的好处而不是人们到底有 没有变化这篇文章有两个切入点：1. 过去和现在的人们到底一样还是不一样2. 学习历史的好处是不是仅仅是这个虽然理论上讲，这两个方面都可以，但是我建议大家可以侧重论述过去和现在的人们是不是一样的这段是范围拆分，证明从人性和社会两个方面 来讲，过去和现在都 没有什么区别点名了学习历史的其他 好处：认识到不同这段大部分内容都是 在讨论不同，但是没有涉及知道这些不同的 意义；如果中心句可以 写成学习历史可以让我们感受到社会的 进步会更好一点的 增强的意识，这个词组用的很好学习历史不仅可以 了解别人的成就，还 可以激励自己，这个中心句最好位于句首这个句式很简单，但是表意很清晰整体看这篇文章思路非常流畅，并且有很充分的理论说明但是在我们实际的考试过程中，这么缜密的理论推理不是每个人都可以做到的；那我们就可以使用一些具体的名人事例来支持自己的观点。