8、What drives environmental practices of SMEs_
- 格式:pdf
- 大小:304.00 KB
- 文档页数:23
WhatdrivesenvironmentalpracticesofSMEs?
BrigitteHoogendoorn•DanielaGuerra•PetervanderZwan
Accepted:11November2014/Publishedonline:22November2014ÓSpringerScience+BusinessMediaNewYork2014
AbstractTheobjectiveofthispaperistodevelopa
betterunderstandingofwhatdrivessmalland
medium-sizedenterprises(SMEs)toengageinenvi-
ronmentalpractices,andwhetherthedriversdiffer
acrosstypesofpractices.Twotypesofenvironmental
practicesaredistinguished:practicesrelatedtopro-
ductionprocesses(greeningprocesses)andpractices
relatedtoproductsandservices(greeningproductand
serviceofferings).Despiteagrowingliteratureon
sociallyresponsiblebehavioroflargefirms,theroleof
SMEsremainsunderexposed.Thisneglectisremark-
ablegiventhesubstantialimpactofSMEsonthe
economyandthenaturalenvironment.Byusing
uniquedataforalmost8,000SMEsacross12sectors
in36countries,westudytheinfluenceoffirm
characteristicsonSMEs’environmentalbehavior.
Ourresultssuggestthatdifferentcharacteristicshave
dissimilarinfluencesonbothtypesofenvironmental
practicessuchasthetypeofcustomersserved.
Stringentenvironmentallegislationencouragesfirms
toactivelytakeonenvironmentalactivities,butonlyincaseofgreenproductsandservices.Moreover,the
dominantideathatsmallfirmsarereluctanttoinvestin
environmentalpracticesisclearlymorenuanced:firm
sizemattersmostforengagementingreeningpro-
cesses.Finally,SMEsactiveintangiblesectorsand
thatreceivefinancialsupportaremoreinvolvedin
eithertypeofenvironmentalpractices.
KeywordsSMEÁEnvironmentalpracticeÁ
StakeholdertheoryÁCorporatesocialresponsibilityÁ
Eurobarometer
JELClassificationsL26ÁM13ÁO31ÁQ56
1Introduction
Therehasbeenagrowingfocusontherolethat
businessesplaypreservingtheenvironmentsincethe
sixties(BansalandHoffman2012;VanMarrewijk
2003).Despiteanemergingliteratureontheroleof
largefirms,theroleofsmallandmedium-sized
enterprises(SMEs)remainsunderexposed(Bansal
andHoffman2012;Arago´n-Correaetal.2008;
Pachecoetal.2010).Thisneglectisremarkablegiven
thesubstantialimpactofSMEsonthenaturalenvi-
ronmentwithestimatesof60–70%oftotalpollution
beingproducedbySMEs(Arago´n-Correaetal.2008;
EuropeanCommission2010).Addressingtheenvi-
ronmentalimpactofSMEsrequiresasolidunder-
standingofwhatdrivesindividualSMEstoengage
inB.Hoogendoorn(&)ÁP.vanderZwanErasmusSchoolofEconomics,ErasmusUniversityRotterdam,P.O.Box1738,3000DRRotterdam,TheNetherlandse-mail:bhoogendoorn@ese.eur.nl
D.GuerraCenterforInnovation,TechnologyandPolicyResearch,InstitutoSuperiorTe´cnico,UniversidadedeLisboa,AvenidaRoviscoPais,1,Lisbon1049-001,Portugal
123SmallBusEcon(2015)44:759–781DOI10.1007/s11187-014-9618-9environmentalpractices.Toooften,policiesarebased
oninsightsfromlargefirmsassumingthatSMEsare
miniaturizedversionsofcorporatefirms(Arago´n-
Correaetal.2008;Perrinietal.2007).
Theobjectiveofthispaperwastodevelopabetter
understandingofwhatdrivesSMEstoengagein
environmentalpractices,andwhetherthedrivers
differacrosstypesofenvironmentalpractices.Two
typesofenvironmentalpracticesaredistinguished:
engagementingreeningprocessesandingreening
productandserviceofferings.
Weaddresstwoimportantgapsintheliterature.
Fromapracticalperspective,weaddressthecallfrom
themarketandpolicymakersonSMEstolowerthe
environmentalimpactoftheirproductsandprocesses
(EuropeanCommission2010).Fromaresearchper-
spective,wemovebeyondthepredominantfocuson
largecorporatefirmsfocusingonsmallfirmsin
‘‘dirty’’industries(BansalandHoffman2012)and
addressthelackofdifferentiationbetweentypesof
environmentallyfriendlyactivities(HalmeandLaur-
ila2009;Uhlaneretal.2012).
WeinvestigatedifferencesacrossSMEsregarding
theirengagementinenvironmentalbehavior.Large-
scaleharmonizeddataforalmost8,000SMEsacross
12sectorsin36countriesareusedtotestthe
hypotheses.Thesedataareretrievedfromthe2012
FlashEurobarometersurveyon‘‘SMEs,resource
efficiency,andgreenmarkets’’(no.342)thatwas
conductedonbehalfoftheEuropeanCommission.
Thisstudymakesseveralcontributions.First,our
multi-countryandmulti-sectorsetupisanextensionof
existingstudiesthatarelimitedtoasinglecountry
(Perrinietal.2007;Uhlaneretal.2012)and/orasingle
industry(LepoutreandValente2012;SineandLee
2009).WeinvestigatehowdifferencesbetweenSMEs
regardingtheirenvironmentalbehaviordependon
severalfirm-levelcharacteristics,thetangibilityofthe
businesssector,andthestringencyofenvironmental
legislationatthecountrylevel.Ourresearchdesign,
hence,allowsfortakingnovelfactorsintoconsider-
ationsuchasenvironmentallegislation.Inaddition,
ourresultsarelesshamperedbysamplespecificity
comparedtoexistingempiricalstudies.
Second,bytakingtwotypesofenvironmental
behaviorintoaccount,weinvestigatewhetherthe
conditionsunderwhichSMEsengageinenvironmen-
talpracticesdifferacrosstypesofenvironmental
practices.Weaddressthecalltoconsidermultipleenvironmentalpracticeswhenassessingfirmbehavior