Adaptability evaluation of transportation system and urban development

  • 格式:pdf
  • 大小:265.03 KB
  • 文档页数:5

Journal ofHarbin Institute of Technology(New Series),Vo1.16,No.6,2009 

Adaptability evaluation of transportation system and urban development 

PEl Yu—long.GAO Han 

裴玉龙, 高晗 

(School of Transportation Science and Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China,yulongp@263.net) 

Abstract:Sixty indexes,ranging from social development and economy increasing to ecological protection and transportation system construction,are chosen to construct an index system of adaptability evaluation on trans- portation system and urban development.A synthesis model with nonlinear characteristic is proposed.and the corresponding procedure is presented based on an improved AHP mode1.which utilizes the SVD method to im— prove the required precision of matrix with acceptable consistency weight and detect and amend the significant elements via distance and proximity so as to improve the whole consistency.Taking Shandong Province for the case study,experimental results indicate that the adaptability degree of the system is in an increasing state, which provides robust and effective support for decision—makers working on a range of problems and in various circumstances. Key words:adaptability degree;adaptability evaluation;AHP model;SVD method;significant element CLC number:U491 Document code:A Artiele ID:1005—9113(2009)06 884-05 

Transportation system is an important carrier of ur— ban development.The relationship between transporta 

tion and urban development is mutually reinforeins and 

checking each other.Simply put,urban development 

will inerease the traffic demand.In return.traffic and 

transportation construction would change the city g posi— 

tion.resulting in the effective exploitation of urban land 

resources.AHP.as a useful tool in multifaetor analy— 

sis,complex condition evaluation and decision making, 

has been widely used in different fields.As a systemat— 

ic investigation method combining qualitive analysis, 

there are several faetors that make AHP distingui8hable 

from its alternatives such as 

ble sort,binary search tree 

gie,2001). spanning tree matrix,bub- 

and priority groups(Mag— 

However,our efforts in preparing these square matrices made us realize that iudgment CR≤0.1 is not 

always consistent with each other and the strengths and 

weaknesses of the AHP have been the subieet of sub. stantial debate on the theoretical foundations of the 

AHP and about some of its properties among special— 

ists.On the contrary.inconsistencies with higher per— 

centages would lead to severe problems in the hieratical 

process.This paper uses SVD method to improve its 

consistency so as to investigate the adaptability degree 

of transportation system and urban development. 

1 Evaluation Model 

1.1 Establishment of Index System 

Taking social development,economic growth,re— sources and environment and COOrdinated transportation 

system into consideration,qualitative and multivariate 

statistical analysis methods are employed to 60 inde. 

pendent,measurable,comparable and representative 

index variables.in which the choice of transportation 

system indexes are based on the”City Traffic Planning 

and Design Standards”in the 2002 version of”Urban Traffic Management Evaluation System”.The proposed 

variables and indexes are shown in Tabs.1—4. 

Tab.1 Index of social development subsystem 

Inspection field/C Evaluation index/D Symbol 

Societv/C Gini toemcient 

Urbanization/eveI/% 

Criminal rate per ten thousand persons/% 

Natural population growth rate/%o 

Population/C2 Population density/(P・km一 ) 

Public education to GDP/% 

Engels coefficient of residents consumption/% 

Living/C3 Housing area of urban residents per capita/m 

Subscriptions per capita/piece 

Received 2007—07—3O. Sponsored by the Key Projects of the National Science&Technology Pillar Program in the Eleventh Five—year Plan Period(Grant No.2006BAJI8B01) 

・884・

 Jo ̄rnal ofHarbin Institute of Technology(New Series),Vo1.16,No.6,2009 

Tab.2 Index of economical condition subsystem 

Tab.3 Evaluation index of natural resource and environ- ment subsystem 

Tab.4 Index of transportation system 

Inspection field/C Evaluation index/D Svmbol 

Emciencv /C8 Average travel fad/min 

Bus ̄cupaney per ten thousand capita/Vehicle D26 

Bus trip ratio/%D27 

Average speed of arterial highway/(km-h ) d“ 一c rans叫ation investment coe ent 

Traffic and transportation cost coefficient 

Traffic and transportation safety coefficient/% Function . /Cl。 R。 d p 。p 印ita/ 

E and F services ratio of intersection 

Public transit density/(km・km ) 

Supply—demand ratio of central urban parking space 

Traffic signs installed ratio/(Block・km ) D28 

D29 

D30 

D3l 

D32 

D” 

D34 

D35