下载文档原格式
医疗辅助队薄板，带和板块-退火- 70,000防扩散产量4901医疗辅助队板，损伤容限级- 6AI 4V电压，测试退火4905医疗辅助队板带材- 8Mn退火- 110,000防扩散产量4908医疗辅助队板材，片材和带- 5Al 2.5Sn合金，退火4910医疗辅助队板带材- 15V的3Cr 3Sn＃人工智能-解决方案热处理4914医疗辅助队板材，片材和带- 8Al 1Mo钢1V的-双面退火4916医疗辅助队板，板带材，钛合金6V的2Sn -退火4918医疗辅助队锻件-钛合金4V -阿尔法测试版或Beta加工-退火4920医疗辅助队酒吧，锻件及戒指- 5Al 2.5Sn合金-超低间隙，退火- 90,000防扩散产量4924医疗辅助队酒吧及锻件-钛合金4V -退火- 120,000防扩散产量4928医疗辅助队酒吧，锻件及环- 6Al - 4V合金ELI的，双相退火，断裂韧性4931医疗辅助队挤出和闪光焊接戒指-钛合金4V -解决热处理及老年4934医疗辅助队挤出和闪光焊接戒指-钛合金4V -测试加工4936医疗辅助队管，无缝-退火- 40,000防扩散产量4942医疗辅助队管，无缝-液压- 3.0Al为2.5V -冷加工，应力松了一口气4944医疗辅助队丝，焊接- 5Al 2.5Sn合金4953医疗辅助队丝，焊接- 8Al 1Mo钢1V的4955医疗辅助队酒吧及丝，3Al - 8V的- 6Cr - 4Mo - 4Zr，耗材电极融化，冷拔4957医疗辅助队丝- 13.5V 11Cr 3Al -回火弹簧4959医疗辅助队锻件- 5Al 2.5Sn合金-退火- 110,000防扩散产量4966医疗辅助队酒吧及锻件- 7Al 4Mo -解决方案与沉淀热处理4970医疗辅助队酒吧与戒指- 8Al 1Mo钢1V的-解决方案及热处理稳定4972医疗辅助队酒吧及锻件- 11Sn 5.0Zr 2.3Al 1.0Mo 0.21Si -解决方案与沉淀热处理4974医疗辅助队锻件-钛合金2Sn 4Zr 2Mo减振-解决方案与沉淀热处理4976医疗辅助队酒吧及锻件钛合金2Sn 4Zr 6Mo -解决方案与沉淀热处理4981明康的T 9046H钛和钛合金薄板，带和钢板第二类-阿尔法合金：组成阿- 5Al - 2.5Sn合金B炸药- 5Al - 2.5Sn合金ELI的组成前锋- 8Al - 1Mo钢- 1V的组成后卫-钛合金- 2Cb - 1Ta - .8MoIV型-测试合金组成阿- 13Al - 11Cr - 3AlB炸药- 11.5Mo - 6Zr - 4.5Sn（三版）成分C - 3Al - 8V的- 6Cr - 4Mo - 4Zr（测试版荤™）（10）军用- T的- 9046J钛和钛合金薄板，带和钢板阿尔法合金（甲）阿- 1 - 5Al - 2.5Sn合金阿- 2 - 5Al - 2.5Sn合金（ELI的）阿- 3 -钛合金- 2Cb - 1Ta - .8Mo的A - 4 - 8Al - 1Mo钢- 1V的测试合金（乙） B - 1载- 13V的- 11Cr - 3AlB - 2号- 11.5Mo - 6Zr - 4.5Sn（三版）B区3 - 3Al - 8V的- 6Cr - $钼$锆（测试版荤™）（10）乙- 4 - 8Mo - 8V的- 1023 - 3Al军用- T的- 9047E钛及钛合金棒材及再造股票α-β合金组成6 - 6Al - 4V合金组成7 - 6Al - 4V合金ELI的组成8 -钛合金到6V - 2Sn组成9 - 7Al - 4Mo组成10 - 11Sn - 5Zr - 2〃- 1Mo钢组成11 -钛合金- 2Sn - 4Zr - 2Mo减振组成14 -钛合金- 2Sn - 4Zr - 6Mo军用- T的- 9047G钛及钛合金棒材及再造股票，飞机质量阿尔法合金钛- 5Al - 2.5Sn合金钛- 5Al - 2.5Sn合金（ELI的）钛合金- 2Cb - 1Ta - .8Mo8Al - 1Mo钢- 1V的测试合金钛- 8Mo - 8V的- 1023 - 3Al钛- 11.5Mo - 6Zr - 4.5Sn（三版）钛- 3Al - 8V的- 6Cr - 4Mo - 4Zr（测试版荤™）（10）钛- 13V的- 11Cr - 3Al。
航空航天材料标准规范AMS 4911L 退火钛合金6Al-4V 薄板、带材和中厚板原理AMS 4911L产生于节的SI转换值。
AMS 4911K产生于包括报告要求修订和表2 标题修正的考查和更新。
1. 范围规格本规范涵盖了各种规格的薄板、带材和中厚板钛合金。
应用此类产品主要应用于750。
F (399E)温度下需要较大强度的零件，但是其应用不仅仅限于此类应用。
1.2.1一些加工方法和服役条件可能造成此类产品对应力一腐蚀裂纹；ARP82推荐了减小这些条件的习惯做法。
2. 参考资料下述文件在购买订单签订之日起生效，这里列出了部分标准的指定要求。
供货商需按照标准规范的最新修订版加工，除非指定专门标准要求。
当参考标准取消且替换标准没有指定，最新修订版的标准需要提供。
2.1 SAE 规范SAEt、会授权，协会地址：400 Com mon wealth Drive, Warre ndale, PA 15096-0001, Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USAand Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside USA), or 2242 高强，耐蚀和耐热钢，铁合金，钛，钛合金薄板、带材和中厚板AMS 2249 钛和钛合金化学成分分析AMS 2631 钛和钛合金棒材和坯段超声波探伤AMS 2750 高温测定法AMS 2809 钛和钛合金锻件成品标识ARP982 减小钛合金锻件成品的应力—腐蚀裂纹的方法2.2 ASTM规范AST协会授权，协会地址：100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Con shohocke n,PA 19428-2959,Tel: 6, or E8 金属材料拉伸试验方法ASTM E290 材料韧性弯曲试验方法ASTM E384 材料微米探测压痕硬度方法ASTM E539 6Al-4V钛合金的x射线发射光谱测定法ASTM E1409 惰性气体中熔化方法测定钛和钛合金中氧与氮含量ASTM E1447 惰性气体中熔化导热率/红外线探测方法测定钛和钛合金中氢含量ASTM E1941 难熔活性金属及其合金的碳测定方法ASTM E2371基于原子发射等离子体光谱法的钛和钛合金分析3. 技术要求成分成分需要符合表1中所示的质量分数要求；碳含量按照ASTM E194测定，氢含量按照ASTM E44确定，氧、氮含量按照ASTM E140测定，其它元素测定方法符合ASTM E53或者ASTM E2371如购买方同意，可以使用其它分析方法。
航空航天首件检验要求前言1998年12月，航空航天行业本着通过价值流显著改进质量和降低成本的目的，成立了国际航空航天质量组织（IAQG）。
该组织由SAE、SJAC、AECMA主办，由来自美国、亚洲和欧洲航空航天公司的代表组成，一致同意负责本标准的技术内容。
目录1. 介绍………………………………………………………………………………1.1 范围……………………………………………………………………………………………1.2 目的……………………………………………………………………………………………1.3 约定……………………………………………………………………………………………2. 参考文献…………………………………………………………………………3. 定义………………………………………………………………………………4. 适用范围…………………………………………………………………………5.要求………………………………………………………………………………6.表格………………………………………………………………………………6.1 表1：部件号说明……………………………………………………………………………6.2 填写“表1-部件号说明”的指导说明………………………………………………………6.3 表2：产品说明——原材料、特殊过程、功能试验………………………………………6.4 填写“表2-产品说明——原材料、特殊过程、功能试验”的指导说明…………………6.5 表3：特性说明、验证和符合性评价………………………………………………………6.6 表3-续表：特性说明、验证和符合性评价…………………………………………………6.7 填写“表3和表3-续表：特性说明、验证和符合性评价”的指导说明…………………1. 介绍：1.1 范围：本SAE航空航天标准（AS）规定了进行首件检验（FAI）的文件要求。
1.2 目的：首件检验的目的是为正确理解、说明、验证和文件化所有工程设计和规范的要求提供客观证据。
AMS2759宇航材料规范宇航材料规范(AMS2759)是由美国国防部和国际宇航材料技术委员会(IAQG)共同制定的国际标准，用于指导和规范宇航材料的质量控制和热处理过程。
该规范的目的是确保宇航材料的性能和可靠性，以满足航天器和航空器在极端环境下的安全运行要求。
AMS2759规范适用于铝合金、钛合金、镍基合金和钢等常用于航空航天行业的材料。
它涵盖了热处理、淬火、回火、冷处理、时效等热处理工艺，以及表面处理，如酸洗、阳极处理和电镀等。
该规范还包括了检验、测试和认证方面的要求，确保材料的质量和性能符合标准。
AMS2759规范对热处理工艺进行了详细的规定，包括工艺参数、温度控制、保温时间和冷却速度等。
根据材料的不同性质和用途，可以选择不同的热处理过程，以达到理想的材料性能。
规范还明确了热处理过程中的监控和记录要求，以便对热处理过程进行追溯和分析。
除热处理外，AMS2759规范还对材料的表面处理进行了要求。
表面处理可以改善材料的耐腐蚀性能、附着力和美观度。
规范规定了不同表面处理方法的工艺参数和要求，以确保表面处理的质量和一致性。
在质量控制方面，AMS2759规范要求对材料进行严格的检验和测试。
规范列出了一系列的检验项目，包括化学成分分析、金相组织观察、硬度测试和力学性能测试等。
这些测试项目可以帮助确认材料的质量和性能是否符合标准要求。
最后，AMS2759规范还对质量认证和供应链管理提出了要求。
它要求供应商必须具备一定的质量管理体系，并通过第三方认证机构的审核和认证。
这样可以确保宇航材料的质量和可靠性，降低供应链风险。
总之，AMS2759宇航材料规范是一个广泛使用的国际标准，用于指导和规范宇航材料的质量控制和热处理过程。
通过遵循该规范的要求，可以确保宇航材料在极端条件下的安全运行，提高航天器和航空器的性能和可靠性。
同时，规范还对宇航材料的表面处理、检验和质量认证等方面提出了具体要求，进一步提高了宇航材料的质量和一致性。
航空材料规范AMS 2700 E出版 2000.03修订 2011.11替换 AMS 2700DAMS-QQ-P-35QQ-P-35耐蚀钢的钝化理由AMS2700E的发行是为了合并截止2011年6月14日经过AMS B委员会批准的所有的更改，这些更改本来计划要加入AMS2700D中去的，但由于疏忽遗漏了。
所有更改均列在8.17节。
1. 范围1.1 目的本规范包含的操作要求是用以规范从耐蚀钢零件表面去除游离铁或其它少量贵金属污染物。
1.2 应用在本规范中详述的操作的典型应用是溶解位于耐蚀钢表面的杂质金属元素，以提高钢的耐蚀性，但并不仅仅限于此类应用。
1.3 分类1.3.1 方法本规范包含的钝化方法如下：方法1 - 硝酸钝化方法2 - 柠檬酸钝化应使用方法1，除非方法2得到工程认可。
1.3.2 类型：使用方法1，可以选用以下类型：1型添加重铬酸钠的低温硝酸溶液2型添加重铬酸钠的中温硝酸溶液3型添加重铬酸钠的高温硝酸溶液4型对于易切削钢，40％硝酸溶液5型对于高碳马氏体钢，阳极化6型低温硝酸溶液7型中温硝酸溶液8型中温高浓度硝酸溶液当没有指定类型时，操作者可以使用下列任何一个满足此处要求的类型。
1.3.3 级别钝化检验的级别如下：1.3.3.1 1级以下类型的零件应该依据章节4.3.1的要求进行测试。
1.3.3.1.1 在采购文件中没有确定检验频率的紧固件，包括螺母、螺栓、垫圈、铆钉和相关部件。
1.3.3.1.2 图纸上标有AN、MS、NAS或类似标识的且没有规定检验频率的标准件。
1.3.3.1.3 采购方指定要求进行测试的。
1.3.3.2 2级腐蚀试验的频率是每一批抽取一个零件。
1.3.3.3 3级按试验周期进行试验。
1.3.3.4 4级引用AMS-QQ-P-35或QQ-P-35的零件，按照4.3.4节要求进行接收检验。
1.3.3.5 当没有指定级别且没有采用1.3.3.1（1级）和1.3.3.4（4级）时，将采用2级。
PART NAME:COOLANT HOSES AND CLAMPS PART NUMBER: ESDG93-8260-AALETFRLETFRDATE REV SECT REVISION DR CK PREPARED BY: 14 DEC 2010 A Initial Release - WPTS E 11505891 182 N/A22 Oct 2013 B1 3.18Added High Flow Coolant Erosion Test andrenumbered sectionsCHECKED BY: B2 3.2 Added Degas Bottle staining test N/AB3 3.17Modify unclamped blow-off test to record maxblow off pressureDETAILED BY: B4 3.13 Updated sample length to 150mm max N/AReleasedAC00-E-12322631-066REFERENCE:23 Sept 2014 C1C23.133.15.3Revised insertion effort testing method andreportingAdded inspection of joints to PVT testReleasedAC00-E12322631-078N/AAPPROVALRELEASED BY:KATIE GRABSTANDARD NOTES:FOR CURRENT RELEASE STATUS, SEE WERS ENGINEERING NOTICE.CONTROL ITEM –IDENTIFIES CRITICAL CHARACTERISTICS DESIGNATED BY THE CROSS FUNCTIONAL1. GENERALThe purpose of this specification is to define the functional engineering requirements of a rubber hose assembly.This specification is a supplement to the released drawing, and all requirements must be met. Exceptions to this specification are not permitted.SAFETY NOTE: The test procedures in this specification are specifically designed to evaluate rubber hoseassembly performance and durability failure mechanisms. Temperature and pressure extremes, mechanical loading, and chemical exposure are all used to create simulated hose assembly failures. The testing facility is responsible to ensure all required laboratory safety precautions are followed.2. SUMMARY OF DESIGN VERIFICATION, PRODUCTION VALIDATION, AND IN-PROCESS TESTINGDesign Verification (DV) tests verify the design meets functional engineering requirements. DV testing completion, and Ford Product Development Engineering approval of Design Verification Plan and Report (DVPR), is required prior to any design being approved for production tooling.Production Validation (PV) tests validate the production manufacturing process produces parts as designed. PV testing completion, and Ford Product Development Engineering approval of Production Validation Plan and Report (PVPR), is required prior to any manufacturing process being approved for production.In-Process (IP) tests ensure the production manufacturing process remains capable and stable. Ford Product Development Engineering approval of manufacturing process control plan, and associated In-Process Testing Plan, is required prior to any manufacturing process being approved for production. IP testing is also commonly known as Continuing Conformance (CC) testing.All sample sizes defined in this specification are minimum required per part number. Ford may require increased PV quantity, and / or increased IP quantity, and / or increased IP frequency after manufacturing process and control plan review. Any test plan, including use of surrogate data or additional test quantities to ensure statisticalconformance, must be approved by Ford Product Development Engineering. Any sample size identified as"Testing not required", only implies conformance testing demonstration is not required. "Testing not required" does not permit acceptance criteria nonconformance. Ford reserves the right to require acceptance criteriaconformance demonstration testing at any time.DV, PV, and IP sample size, acceptance criteria, and statistical conformance are summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Test summary provided as reference only. See specific test for complete details and requirements.Test NameDVSampleSizePVSampleSizeIPSampleSizeAcceptance CriteriaStatisticalConformance SECTION A: HOSE CONSTRUCTION – REINFORCED HOSES3.1Burst, Swell, and ImpulseTesting per WSE-M96D34- A2/A3/A46 for anyinternalrequirements6 for anyinternalrequirements(For Burst and Swell,DV may besubmitted for PV withapproval from FordEngineering)NR•See Specification for acceptancecriteria.See specification forconformance criteria.3.2Physical Properties and Staining Potential – Hose per WSE-M96D34- A2/A3/A46 for anyinternalrequirements6 for anyinternalrequirements(DV may besubmitted for PV withapproval from FordEngineering)NR•See Specification for acceptancecriteria.See specification forconformance criteria.3.3Physical Properties – Wire perASTM A-2276 for anyinternalrequirements6 for anyinternalrequirementsNR•See Specification for acceptancecriteria.See specification forconformance criteria.3.4Corrosion Resistance – Wireper ASTM B-1176 for anyinternalrequirements6 for anyinternalrequirementsNR•See Specification for acceptancecriteria.See specification forconformance criteria.SECTION B: CLAMPS3.5Clamp dimensions, material, heat treat, and performance per WK902 Worldwide Fastener Standard6 for anyinternalrequirements6 for anyinternalrequirementsNR•See Specification for acceptancecriteria.See specification forconformance criteria.3.6Clamp Corrosion Protection perWSS-M21P45-A1/A26 for anyinternalrequirements6 for anyinternalrequirementsNR •See Specification for acceptancecriteria.See specification forconformance criteria.3.7 Horizontal Clamp Adhesion tothe Hose with Pull Off Test 630 per clampdiameter perglue stationNR•The clamp must withstand333N without de-bondingthe glue and degrading thehose material.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.8 Radial Clamp Adhesion ReturnTest6 6 NR•Clamp must return to theoriginal position within +/-10 degrees.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.9 Clamp Glue Strength- HighTemperature 6 6 NR •Insertion efforts to lessthan those defined withinprovided Ford Hose JointMatrix.•No visible leaks duringtesting.•No visible damage ofhoses.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.10 Clamp Glue Dissociation- HighTemperature 6 6 NR•Inspect hoses for anydamage (pitting) after hosehas been removed.•Glue, plating and rubberresidue permissible.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.11 Clamp Glue De-bonding 6 6 NR •Clamp must de-bond withno degradation of the hosematerial.•Glue, plating and rubberresidue permissible.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteriaSECTION C: COMPLETE HOSE ASSEMBLIES3.12 Hose DimensionalRequirements 6 30 6 parts per startof each run (tobe captured inControl Plan)•All ID, OD, wall thickness,and wall variabilitydimensions must adhereto the tolerances as shownon the drawing and have acpk of at least 1.33.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.13 Hose Insertion Efforts 15 15 NR •The force required toinsert the hose onto a tubemust not exceed ERGOtargets.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.14 Wet Leak / Blow Off Test 6 (+1) 6 NR•The coolant hoseassembly must not leak atless than 1.2 times themaximum operatingpressure or 248kPa,whichever is greater. Thecoolant hose must notblow-off or separate atless than 1.5 times themaximum operatingpressure.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.15 PVT/Durability(Pressure, Vibrations &Temperature)6 6 NR•Test assemblies mustcomplete 28,000 pressurecycles with no noticeablecoolant leakage.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.16 Air Under Water Test 6 6 NR •The coolant hoseassembly must not leak orseparate at less than 248kPa.•Failure is visible airbubbles under the water orseparation of the hosefrom tube.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.17 Unclamped Air Blow-off TestNR 3 NR •For information only•Record maximium blow-offpressure on HJOINTtemplate.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.18 High Flow Coolant Erosion Test(Glass fiber reinforced nyloncomponents with orifice smallerthan 10mm diameter) 3 3 NR•The coolant hoseassembly must not leak orseparate at less than 248kPa (36 psi). Failure isvisible air bubbles underthe water.•The change in pressuredrop may not vary by morethan 5% or by the amountcalled out on theengineering drawing.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteriaSECTION D: COMPLETE HOSE ASSEMBLIES WITH BRANCHED PORTIONS3.19 Pullout Test(Branched Hose assembly)6 per eachbranch of hose6 per eachbranch of hoseNR•The minimum applied loadshould be no less than102 kg.•The hose should pass thistest without any failures.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteria3.20 Pressure Cycling(Branched Hose assembly) 6 per cavity 6 per cavityNR•50,000 cycles minimummust be achieved withoutfailure, where failure isdefined as burst, visibleleak or deformation.All samplesmeet theacceptancecriteriaSECTION E: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS3.21 Hose Requirements NR NR NR •To be included within thePPAP packaged. All samples meet the acceptance criteria3.22 Identification NR NR NR •To be included within thePPAP package. All samples meet the acceptance criteria3. SECTION A: HOSE CONSTRUCTION TEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA3.2.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.3. Physical Properties – Wire per ASTM A-2273.3.1. Instrumentation•Refer to instrumentation required within specification ASTM A-227.3.3.2. Procedure•Refer to procedure within specification ASTM A-227.X3.3.3. Acceptance Criteria•Refer to the acceptance criteria required within specification ASTM A-227.3.3.4. Sample Size•DV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification ASTM A-227.•PV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification ASTM A-227.•IP: Not required.3.3.5. Statistical Conformance•Refer to conformance criteria within the specification ASTM A-227.3.3.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.4. Corrosion Resistance – Wire per ASTM B-1173.4.1. Instrumentation•Refer to instrumentation required within specification ASTM B-117.3.4.2. Procedure•Refer to procedure within the specification ASTM B-117.3.4.3. Acceptance Criteria•Refer to the acceptance criteria within the specification ASTM B-117.X3.4.4. Sample Size•DV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification ASTM B-117.•PV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification ASTM B-117.•IP: Not required.3.4.5. Statistical Conformance•Refer to conformance criteria within the specification ASTM B-117.3.4.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3. SECTION B: CLAMP TEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIAClamp Retention Method – GluingGluing is the only approved method of clamp retention for pre-opened pre-positioned constant tensionhose clamps (POPP-CTHC). A glued POPP clamp must meet, at a minimum, the followingperformance specifications.The POPP clamp must be glued on the hose at the final assembly position. Glue location is 180degrees opposite the installation tangs of the clamps, as shown below. Clamp location to the end ofthe hose must be specified on the assembly drawing.3.5. Clamp Dimensions, Material, Heat Treat, and Performance per WK9023.5.1. Instrumentation•Refer to instrumentation required within specification WK902.3.5.2. Procedure•Refer to procedure within specification WK902.3.5.3. Acceptance Criteria•Refer to acceptance criteria required within specification WK902.3.5.4. Sample Size•DV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification WK902.•PV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification WK902.•IP: Not required.3.5.5. Statistical Conformance•Refer to conformance criteria within the specification WK902.3.5.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.6. Clamp Corrosion Protection per WSS-M21P45-A1/A23.6.1. Instrumentation•Refer to instrumentation required within specification WSS-M21P45-A1/A2.3.6.2. Procedure•Refer to procedure within specification WSS-M21P45-A1/A2.3.6.3. Acceptance Criteria•Refer to acceptance criteria within specification WSS-M21P45-A1/A2.•DV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification WSS-M21P45-A1/A2.•PV: (6) for any internal requirements within the specification WSS-M21P45-A1/A2.•IP: Not required.3.6.5. Statistical Conformance•Refer to conformance criteria within the specification WSS-M21P45-A1/A2.3.6.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.7. Horizontal Clamp Adhesion to the Hose with Pull Off Test (Destructive)3.7.1. Instrumentation•Fixture to properly secure sample during test procedure.•Must be capable of measuring the pull off force of at least 445N (100 lbf).•The clamps must be production representative and glued onto the hose per the Engineering drawing.3.7.2. Procedure•Install hose assembly in a vise from 100 to 150mm (4 to 6 inches) of the hose end.•Attach force test equipment 180 degrees from the glued surface.•Pull clamp parallel to the hose centerline with a rate of 100 – 130 mm/minute (4 – 5 inches/minute).•Apply force until at least 333N (75lbf) without de-bonding the glue and degrading the hose material.•Continue to apply force until de-bonding occurs. Note force value at which this event occurs.3.7.3. Acceptance Criteria•The clamp must withstand 333N without de-bonding the glue and/or degrading the hose material.•DV: 6•PV: 30 per diameter per glue station•IP: Not required.3.7.5. Statistical Conformance•There is no statistical conformance for this requirement. All samples must meet the acceptance criteria.3.7.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.8. Radial Clamp Adhesion Return Test (non-Destructive)3.8.1. Instrumentation•Fixture to properly secure sample during test procedure.•Force gauges capable of measuring the full of force of at least 445N (100 lbf).•The clamps must be production representative and glued onto the hose per the Engineering drawing.3.8.2. Procedure•Install hose assembly in a vise from 100 to 150mm (4 to 6 inches) of the hose end.•Attach force test equipment 180 degrees from the glued surface.•Rotate clamp radially in either direction 45 degrees and hold for one minute.•Remove test equipment from clamp and allow clamp to recover to its natural position for one minute.3.8.3. Acceptance Criteria•Clamp must return to the original position within +/- 10 degrees.•DV: 6•PV: 6•IP: Not required.3.8.5. Statistical Conformance•There is no statistical conformance for this requirement. All samples must meet the acceptance criteria.3.8.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.9. Clamp Glue Strength– High Temperature (Destructive)3.9.1. Instrumentation•Production intent ports required for each hose joint as defined in Ford Hose Joint Matrix.•Oven capable of reaching temperatures of 70±3°C.•Force gauges to measure maximum insertion efforts for hose installation.•The clamps must be production representative and glued onto the hose per the drawing.3.9.2. Procedure•Heat oven to 70±3°C.•Place hoses within oven for a minimum of 24 hrs.•Remove the hoses from the oven and allow them to cool to ambient 23±3C.•Mark a visible line along the clamp and hose, parallel to the center line of the hose over the middle of the glue patch. This line will be used as reference to determine if the clamp has moved relative to thehose during the release process.•Install heat aged hoses onto production intent ports, and release the clamps with a standard screwdriver with a tip width of 5±1mm and force applied a distance of 17±4 cm.3.9.3. Acceptance Criteria•Clamp must not de-bond (spin freely) from hose during the hose assembly and clamp release process.The reference line on the hose relative to the reference line on the clamp must be within 15 degrees.•No visible damage of hoses.3.9.4. Sample Size•DV: 6•PV: 6•IP: Not required.3.9.5. Statistical Conformance•There is no statistical conformance for this requirement. All samples must meet the acceptance criteria.3.9.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.10. Clamp Glue Dissociation – High Temperature (Destructive)3.10.1. Instrumentation•Oven capable of reaching temperatures of 85±3°C.•Tools capable to removing the clamps without damaging hoses.•The clamps must be production representative and glued onto the hose per the drawing.3.10.2. Procedure•Heat oven to 85±3°C.•Place coolant hoses within oven for 6 hours ± 30 minutes.•Remove the hoses from the oven and allow to cool to ambient.•Remove clamps from hoses.3.10.3. Acceptance Criteria•The adhesion must dissociate to a level where the clamp can be removed without damaging (delamination / pitting) greater than 0.5mm from the surface of the hose material.•Glue, plating, and/or minor rubber residue is permissible.3.10.4. Sample Size•DV: 6•PV: 6•IP: Not required.3.10.5. Statistical Conformance•There is no statistical conformance for this requirement. All samples must meet the acceptance criteria.3.10.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.11. Clamp Glue De-bonding (Destructive)3.11.1. Instrumentation•Heat gun capable of temperatures of at least 218°C.•The clamps must be production representative and glued onto the hose per the drawing.3.11.2. Procedure•Apply heated air 204-218°C to glued area of clamp for maximum of 2 minutes.•Manually remove clamp(s) from hose.3.11.3. Acceptance Criteria•Clamp must de-bond with no degradation of the hose material.•No rubber residue on the clamp is permissible.•No clamp coating residue on the hose is permissible.3.11.4. Sample Size•DV: 6•PV: 6•IP: Not required.3.11.5. Statistical Conformance•There is no statistical conformance for this requirement. All samples must meet the acceptance criteria.3.11.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3. SECTION C: TEST PROCEDURES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA (COMPLETE HOSEASSEMBLIES)3.12. Hose Dimensional Requirements (Non-Destructive)3.12.1. Instrumentation•To determine acceptability of the hose I.D., hose O.D. and wall thickness, wall variability and groove depth dimensions. Measurements are to be made on all PV and IP samples.•Lotis QC-20 (or equivalent) non-contact measurement device3.12.2. Procedure•Measurements are to be taken within 25mm (1 inch) distance from end of hose and after forming processes and prior to gluing clamps to hoses.•Record ID, OD, wall thickness, wall variability, and groove depth for each end of the hose samples.NOTE: ID measurements taken using a non-contact method of measurement will typically yield smallervalues than traditional contact measurement methods (ie, plug gages). As a result, opticalmeasurement data for hose ID should be divided by a correction factor of 0.9894 prior to reportingresults.Alternative process for In-Process measurements of ID, OD, wall thickness, and wall variabilityonly: if non-contact measurement equipment is not available (or for diameters that fall outsideof the capabilities of the non-contact measurement device) for on-going IP measurements,traditional measurement devices (plug gages, pi tape, calipers) may be used. The preferredcontact method of measurement is as follows:•Use a pin / plug gage to determine the actual I.D. of the hose.•Leaving the (actual I.D.) plug gage inserted, use a pi tape to measure the (average) O.D. of the hose.•With the plug gage still inserted, use calipers to determine the maximum and minimum (local) O.D. of the hose.•Remove the plug gage and use a snap gage (or equivalent) to measure the wall thickness in at least six different areas around the perimeter of the hose. Use care to include the apparent thickest andthinnest areas of the hose wall.•Subtract the smallest reading from the largest - the difference to determine the range of wall thickness variability.3.12.3. Acceptance Criteria•All ID, OD, wall thickness, and wall variability dimensions must adhere to the tolerances as shown on the drawing and have a cpk of at least 1.33.•Axial groove depth due to reinforcement material on the ID must not exceed an average of 0.16mm AND no individual measurement shall exceed 0.26mm at any time.3.12.4. Sample Size•DV: 6•PV: 30•IP: 6 parts per start of each run.3.12.5. Statistical Conformance•DV: 15•PV: 15•IP: Not required.3.13.5. Statistical Conformance•No individual peak force measurement shall exceed 1.2 times the maximum acceptable insertion targets cascaded by the appropriate Ford Ergonomics Engineer.3.13.6. Reporting•Record the push-on force for each hose on the Hose Joint Matrix.•Retain the insertion Force curves for each sample.•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•Report results generated from universal testing machine (tensile / compression). Report must include bench test values as well as values corrected for application of wiggle method.•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.14. Wet Leak / Blow Off Test (Destructive)3.14.1. Instrumentation•Test Fixture must be capable of pressures of at least 1034 kPag (150 psig) at a rate of 34.5 kPag/sec(5 psig/sec).•Test assemblies should be evaluated in an enclosed test stand.•The spigot / fitting(s) must be production representative.•The clamps must be production representative and glued onto the hose per the drawing.3.14.2. Procedure•Measure all hose samples per 3.12 Hose Dimensional Requirements prior to test.•Measure the spigot / fitting used at the bead and 3 locations along the land length: (1) immediately behind the bead, (2) at the center of the land length, and (3) immediately in front of the hose stop.Sufficient measurements shall be taken around the spigot at each location in order to determine theminimum and maximum diameters at each location. If the land length is not smooth (ie ridges orriblets present) then both major and minor diameters must be measured at each of the three locationsalong the land length.•The resulting interference fit (connector land OD – hose ID) for the parts being used for testing must be within +/-0.1mm of the intended nominal dimension per the hose and spigot drawings. If thecalculated interference stack-up resides outside of the +/- 0.1mm window, then the appropriate FordEngineer shall be contacted for further direction.•The samples shall be allowed to stabilize at standard laboratory test temperature for 1 hour after assembly.•Using either water or 50/50 engine coolant/water mixture, apply pressure at a rate not to Exceed 34.5 kPa/sec (5 psi/sec) up to a maximum of 1034 kPa (150 psi).•Observe and document any movement or leakage of the joint along with corresponding pressures during the test.•After all hoses have been tested with production intent clamps, secure one of the hoses to the production representative connectors with a slotted screw clamp (as used in service). Apply torqueuntil visible damage to the hose / clamp occurs or 5.7Nm (~50in-lbs), whichever is less. Then repeatthe pressure test and re-measure the connector and report any damage to the connector due to theclamp load applied to the joint.3.14.3. Acceptance Criteria•The coolant hose assembly must not leak (ie, no visible fluid) at less than 1.2 times the maximum operating pressure or 248kPag (36psig), whichever is greater. The coolant hose must not blow-off orseparate at less than 1.5 times the maximum operating pressure.•The single hose joint secured with a screw clamp must not leak or separate at less than 1.5 times the maximum operating pressure. The tube shall not be dimensionally distorted enough to cause failure ofthe joint (leakage or blow-off).3.14.4. Sample Size•DV: 6 (+1 for screw clamp)•PV: 6•IP: Not required.3.14.5. Statistical Conformance•There is no statistical conformance for this requirement. All samples must meet the acceptance criteria.3.14.6. Reporting•All test reports must include all measurements, photographs, and data files as defined in procedure.•All test reports must include all laboratory notes and test observation log sheets.•If no leakage occurs below 1034 kPag (150 psig), then state "pass at 1034 kPag (150 psig)".•If leakage and/or blow-off occurs below 1034 kPag (150 psig), note the actual pressures of the events.•Note any damage with either the hoses, clamps, or connector(s)•DV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with DVPR submission.•PV test report must be provided to Ford in electronic format with PVPR submission.•IP test reports not required.3.15. Pressure, Vibrations & Temperature (PVT) Durability3.15.1. Instrumentation•Test assemblies must be evaluated in a controlled environmental chamber with a vibration table.•The spigot / fitting(s) must be production representative.•The clamps must be production representative and glued onto the hose as shown in the drawing.3.15.2. Procedure。
型号TYPE：T版次ISSUE： EAC7102Nadcap热处理审核标准（共 171页）AC7102 E 发文单位 DESIGN DEPARTMENT：编制 DESIGN：审校 CHECK：审定 EXAMINE：标审 STANDARD：总师 CHIEF OF DEPT.：批准 APPROVAL：会签单位 JOINT SIGNATURE DEPARTMENT：首版日期 1993-06换版日期 2008-09替代 AC7102D2009年2月1日起执行执行性审查学会（PRI）工作程序，特声明：“执行性审查学会PRI出版本报告是为提高技术、工程、和质量科学水平。
本报告的使用完全自愿的，使用者应对它的适用性及在特定条件下使用的合理性，包括因此出现的任何专利侵权承担全部责任。
”执行性审查学会（PRI）欢迎你的书面意见和建议。
版权2007 执行性审查学会版权所有 t-frm-15, 07-01-22161号 Thorn Hill路，Warrendale市，美国宾夕法尼亚州 15086-7527在美国印制Nadcap热处理审核标准1. 给被审查供应商的指导1.1 在正式审查之前1.1.1 供应商应完成如下一系列自查（与之相关的）：●AC7102●AC7102/1(如果寻求钎焊认证)●AC7102/2(如果寻求铝合金热处理认证)●AC7102/3(如果寻求渗碳认证)●AC7102/4(如果寻求渗氮认证)●AC7102/5(如果为检验热处理质量，进行硬度试验)●AC7101/3(如果为检验热处理质量，进行抗拉试验)●AC7101/4(如果为检验热处理质量，进行金相试验)●AC7102/S(如果寻求主要的特性认证)正式的审查之前，所有的不符合项应采取纠正行动来纠正完毕。
在正式的审查中，由工作团判定的技术特性不符合项，需要进行后续审查，所需要费用由供应商支付。
自查应由供应商进行并经过审核员复审。
1.1.2 在自查中，供应商应记录每个程序，按照程序，检查表中各页各段的每个问题都需要一个答案。
1.1.3 准备好Nadcap审核员所需的所有文件资料，将会大大加速审查工作的进程。
1.1.4 供应商应在审查30天之前提交下列各项（以英文形式，除非经过审核员和供应商协商同意）:a. 设备列表（气氛发生器，常规测试设备，试验室设备，无损检测设备，电镀设备，涂层设备，清洗设备，高温测量设备和高温测量校验设备等）b. 采购服务列表，包括计量、加工和测试等在内的供应商的名称，校准时间表，炉温均匀性测试时间表，系统精度测试时间表，硬度机校准时间表等，周期测试（拉伸，脱碳等）时间表c. 人员资质列表，每轮班经批准的热处理人员列表d. 客户列表，包括被客户批准的实施规范的热处理人员e. 供应商执行的热处理规范列表[美军标，国标，工业标准(AMS等)及企标]f. 供应商的通用热处理规程副本，通用高温测量规程副本，通用热处理产品试验/检测规程副本g. 组织结构图1.2 在正式审查期间1.2.1 供应商应提供一份简报给审核员。
供应商的关键人员应参加简介，以便于双方讨论审查目的，方法和评估程序。
1.2.2 提供审核员工作间，应带有桌，椅，电话，办事员，打字机，如需要还应提供复印设备。
1.2.3 审核员应查验委托审核的范围，如果需要，会与供应商协商同意后，在eAuditNet 网站上更改审核范围。
1.2.4 在审查结束时，发布最后简报。
每项不符合报告(NCR)将会被复审，而且供应商将会被给予澄清的机会。
注意: 热处理工作团可能在复审的基础上，改变审核员的决定。
在进行审核后，供应商有21个历日在eAuditNet网站上进行纠正。
供应商应使用适当的形式/媒体(参见eAuditNet-公用文件-eAuditNet供应商指引)回应每个NCR，支持文件应与NCR具有可追踪性。
回应中必须说明与系统管理方式相违背的的不符合项的根源，以及采取或将要采取的纠正行动，以避免再次发生。
1.3 定义和解释参见热处理工作组审核员手册1.3.1 (INFO) : 当在是或否选项的后面跟随着(INFO)标志时, (INFO)符号表明该问题仅作为参考信息，由于相应的要求。
在这些问题上回答“否”不会导致不符合报告或任何解释。
1.4 给供应商的附加信息1.4.1 除了这些审核单以外，还有其它相关信息，例如审核员手册、附件及为完成审核所进行的必要的预指导。
这些资料可以在eAuditNet的公用文件中查找和下载。
2. 供应商信息公司: 审查日期: 区域: 电话: 地址: 传真: 城市/州/邮递区号: 商业性质: 仅用于内部产品: 接受外部工作：总人数: 热处理人员：工作区域的面积（英尺2）: 轮班工作制度：联络人职位电子邮件备注:如需要可附上附页首次审查: 追踪审查: 重评估审查: 审核员的签字: 日期: 先前的纠正行动查证: 日期:审核员:3. 通用质量系统不适用下面带有星号的问题应做出回答，以作为热处理审核的一部分：3.3.13.3.23.4.23.5.13.5.23.5.33.6.2(全部)3.6.43.7.23.9.1如果供应商已经通过了AS9100或AC7004认证并处于有效期限，那么3.1.1～3.11.4的回答,除了带有星号的问题以外，回答均为“是”，除非在本特种工艺审查中发现了其它问题。
3.1 文件控制3.1.1 下列各项文件(无论书面或电子版)投入到车间使用之前，其适用性/完备性是否经过供应商的技术和质量部门审核批准：a.图纸和/或规范是否是否b.外购/外转包材料和工作文件?例如电镀，测试,高温测试,外表处理, 热电偶,采购供应等。
是否c. 工艺控制文件/程序。
例如热处理工艺，硬度测试，校验，高温测试等3.1.2 相应车间是否应用了相应文件的相应版本? 是否3.1.3 所使用的文件版本是否符合雇主清单要求或遵从相是否应的文件控制程序?3.1.4 作废的或难辨认的文件是否被及时地清除掉和[或]是否在出版处或使用地被作了相应标记?3.2 合同评审是否3.2.1 合同文件是否由经过合同评审培训的人员来编制，以确保该合同能完全满足任务要求？3.2.2 是否对合同及采购单进行审核以确保如下要求：a.质量和技术上的要求, 包括客户的任何特殊要求,是否是否被充分地定义和说明?b.是否具有足够的能力，经客户批准且来源于制造是否方，以满足要求？c.与提议/合同的任何偏离是否经过人员/负责人/供是否应商的书面认可?是否d. 对工作状态的陈述是否适当，是否明确了将实施的特种工艺编号，应用类型，等级，级别？e. 对有设计权利的主要航空客户的鉴定是否是否f. 是否明确了飞机模型或零件的编号适用于哪个机型(例如波音)g. 供应商是否将合同要求贯彻到公司内部以及外部是否的分供应商?3.3 不合格品的控制是否3.3.1* 不合格材料是否受到控制，是否按照合同要求将每个不合格品的处理情况通报给了客户?是否3.3.2* 当需要进行重复热处理时,是否被规范所允许，是否有记录，是否重新进行了检测，是否符合客户要求?3.4 纠正行动3.4.1 供应商是否明确了不符合项的根本原因，需要进行纠是否正的行动以避免再次发生？3.4.2* 是否先前在Nadcap审查中采取的纠正行动仍然在继是否不适用续实施(检查最近的2项)?3.5 内部审核是否3.5.1* 计划的和文件规定的内部质量审核是否由不直接对该工作负责的且有资质的人员按照审核时间表来进行审核的？是否3.5.2* 在内部审核中是否包含了供应商申请审核范围内的所有的Nadcap元素?是否3.5.3* 在内部审核后，是否有证据显示进行了纠正的行动并且制定了改进措施？3.6 质量计划3.6.1 供应商是否编制了符合图纸和[或]规范要求的检验是否测试文件，包括接受/拒收标准?3.6.2* 在车间流程卡或其它的工作指令中是否包含:a.零件编号和/或足够的对材料的描述? 是否是否b.零件数量,材料类型,状态，规格，如果有的话还应包括测试样品?c. 工艺操作的次序? 是否d. 完整的和清晰的数据? 是否e.修改，附加和删除由批准的人员来完成？是否f. 记录检验状态的位置？是否g. 记录测试要求和结果的位置？是否h. 记录操作者的位置？是否i. 记录操作日期的位置？是否是否3.6.3 是否只有符合关于仪器使用和温度均匀性要求的热处理设备才能被使用？是否3.6.4* 为完成热处理需要的工艺参数，并不仅限于此：保温时间、保温温度、淬火介质、淬火介质温度（如果适用）、保护气氛或真空要求、炉子等级、仪表类型等，极其上述参数的公差，是否列出在相应零件工作计划中或在控制系统中很容易的参考？是否3.6.5 对应零件厚度不同，是否有相应的热处理时间，或者符合应用规范的其它要求。
3.6.6 当需要时，是否带拉伸试样或其它的测试样品随炉处是否理？是否3.6.7 当规范或用户要求时，是否程序文件规定负载热电偶的使用及放置要求？3.7 更改控制是否3.7.1 对现存工艺计划的更改，按照程序，是否由经过批准的人员来进行？是否不适用3.7.2* 对于需要经过客户核准的特定的工艺，供应商按照批准的工艺进行生产，是否将相应的证据进行存档保管？3.8 首件要求不适用3.8.1 当客户需要，是否对首件检验及批准进行技术文件管是否理?是否3.8.2 对首件检验，当规范要求时，是否对夹具及挂具图纸进行存档管理?3.9 采购是否3.9.1* 全部的分包商测试及处理用设备是否经过了用户的批准?是否3.9.2 是否依据内部文件或专用标准来订购和验收消耗品，例如工艺用气氛，淬火剂，盐浴用盐，热电偶测试用材料？3.10 校验3.10.1 供应商进行工艺和产品生产的全部设备是否进行校是否验并可追踪到国家标准？3.10.2 如果不存在相应国家标准，供应商是否按照设备制造是否商推荐的或按照内部的符合客户要求的校验程序来校验。
是否3.10.3 校验用的参考标准和其它装置是否被维护以防止被损伤？3.11 计算机程序控制和数据获得不适用3.11.1 是否有程序文件明确了用软件来控制和记录热处理是否设备（程序控制器，电子图表等），并且是如何用软件来管理和控制的？3.11.2 是否有程序文件明确了如何来控制软件的访问和数是否据备份和恢复？备份的数据必须保存在安全的地方。
是否3.11.3 是否有程序文件明确了如何来储存, 取回而且确保不能被修改？3.11.4 程序是否被遵守？是否4. 人员4.1 培训4.1.1 是否有培训程序，以确保人员能够进行热处理及相关是否质量和测试，能够完成给定任务？4.1.2 是否有符合程序和文件的培训记录？是否4.2 人员的评估是否4.2.1 是否有程序要求对人员资格进行周期性评估，以确定他们能够熟练完成所分配的热处理及相关任务?4.2.2 是否有评估记录，而且评估结果经过雇员复审？是否4.2.3 按照程序进行的历次评估中，是否可以观察到人员能是否力的提高和进步？5. 材料控制和跟踪5.1 入厂材料5.1.1 在加工成零件前，材料是否被标识，计数，并且对存是否在的质量问题进行解决？5.1.2 程序是否能确保客户文件要求，在整个生产过程中都是否具有可追踪性？5.2 通用清洗5.2.1 内部程序是否要求零件在装炉处理前要进行清洗？是否5.2.2 是否有记录证明程序被正确执行？是否5.3 耐蚀钢的清洗不适用是否5.3.1 内部程序是否要求所有的精加工的沉淀硬化钢零件在装炉处理前要进行清洗且处理完要戴干净的手套搬运？（U11）5.3.2 是否有记录证明程序被正确执行？是否5.4 钛合金清洗和处置不适用是否5.4.1 内部程序是否规定清洗钛合金表面不得使用卤化物？5.4.2 内部程序是否规定处理完要戴干净的手套搬运？是否5.4.3 是否有记录证明程序被正确执行？是否6. 检验不适用6.1 工艺验证6.1.1 是否对每个热处理炉批进行了可追踪性、温度、时间是否准确性及其它相关参数的审查？是否6.1.2 审查是否由质量保证（QA）或其他指定人员进行的，审查结果是否有记录？是否6.1.3 车间书面记录和保管的接收状态及全部的测试数据是否是在操作完成之后进行的？6.2 取样不适用是否6.2.1 当为检验或测试抽取样品的时候，没有相关的取样规定时，是否选择如下的统计取样方法：99%的产品合格的置信度为95%（举例来说，AQL 1.0时为ASQC Z1.4）6.2.2 所有的供应商取样计划是否包含：a. 是否有程序来确定一批零件的取样数量？是否b. 程序中是否确定了取样的周期和方法？是否6.2.3 经过验证后，是否可以减少抽取样品？是否6.2.4 取样是否符合相关的取样方案？是否是否6.2.5 是否进行了关于取样的培训，包括取样的尺寸和部位，怎样加强或减少取样，何种情况下进行加强或减少取样等7. 冷藏及钢的冰冷处理不适用是否7.1 是否有程序规定冷处理，并能符合用户的要求吗，或者当用户无详细要求时，供应商有默认的程序规定吗？7.2 是否有程序规定冷处理的时间和温度限制？是7.3 是否有相关证明记录？是否8 测试不适用Nadcap热处理鉴定程序应用相关的Nadcap材料测试试验审查标准，下列各项例外:8.1 硬度测试不适用a. 对于热处理Nadcap鉴定，不强制进行内部的和外部的交叉测试程序。
