GRE北美范文 人类生存条件

人类生存的根本英语作文英文：The fundamental of human survival is a topic that has been debated and discussed for centuries. In my opinion, the root of human survival lies in our ability to adapt and innovate. Throughout history, humans have faced countless challenges and obstacles, from harsh environments to deadly diseases, and yet we have always found a way to overcome them.One of the key factors in human survival is our adaptability. We have the ability to adjust to new environments, learn new skills, and develop new technologies. For example, when early humans migrated to different regions of the world, they had to adapt to new climates, food sources, and predators. Through trial and error, they learned how to build shelters, make tools, and hunt for food, allowing them to thrive in diverse environments.Another crucial aspect of human survival is ourcapacity for innovation. We are constantly seeking new ways to improve our lives and overcome challenges. For instance, the invention of agriculture revolutionized human societyby providing a stable food supply, allowing populations to grow and civilizations to flourish. Similarly, the development of medicine and healthcare has significantly increased our life expectancy and quality of life.In addition to adaptability and innovation, human connection and cooperation are also essential for survival. We are social beings who thrive in communities and rely on each other for support. Throughout history, humans have formed tribes, villages, and nations to work together for common goals, such as hunting, farming, and defense. Our ability to collaborate and communicate has been crucial in overcoming adversity and building thriving societies.In conclusion, the root of human survival lies in our adaptability, innovation, and social connections. These qualities have allowed us to thrive in diverse environments,overcome challenges, and build civilizations. As wecontinue to face new challenges in the future, it is essential that we continue to adapt, innovate, and work together to ensure our survival and prosperity.中文：人类生存的根本在于我们的适应能力和创新能力。

GRE官方钦定北美GRE满分范文下面是一篇GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文，我们来一起赏析，看看它为何能scored six (先读文章，再看我的点评)The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.北美GRE范文首段This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn\'t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.北美GRE作文范文中间段1The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.北美GRE范文中间段2the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.北美GRE写作范文中间段3Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.北美GRE范文末端In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。

人类生存简介英文作文英文：Human survival is a complex and multifaceted topic. Asa species, we have managed to adapt and thrive in a wide range of environments, from the frozen tundra of the Arctic to the scorching deserts of the Sahara. However, oursuccess has come at a cost, and we now face a number of challenges that threaten our continued existence.One of the biggest challenges we face is climate change. Our reliance on fossil fuels and other unsustainable practices has led to a rapid increase in global temperatures, which is causing sea levels to rise and weather patterns to become more extreme. This is already having a significant impact on our food supplies, water resources, and overall quality of life.Another major challenge is overpopulation. As ourglobal population continues to grow, we are puttingincreasing pressure on our planet's resources. This is leading to deforestation, desertification, and other forms of environmental degradation, which in turn are exacerbating the effects of climate change.Despite these challenges, I believe that humans have the capacity to adapt and overcome. We have a long history of innovation and problem-solving, and I am confident that we can find solutions to the challenges we face. For example, we are already seeing a shift towards renewable energy sources like solar and wind power, which could help to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. We are also developing new technologies and methods for sustainable agriculture and water management.Ultimately, the key to our survival as a species will be our ability to work together and make collective decisions that prioritize the long-term health of our planet. We need to recognize that our actions have consequences, and that we have a responsibility to future generations to ensure that they have the same opportunities for survival and prosperity that we have enjoyed.中文：人类的生存是一个复杂而多方面的话题。

While nearly everyone would agree in principle that certain efforts to preserve the natural environment are in humankind's best interests,exclusive reliance on volunteerism would be naive and imprudent, especially considering the stakes involved .For this reason, and because serious environmental problems are generally large in scale,I agree that government participation is needed to ensure environmental preservations is needed to ensure environmental preservation.Experience tells usthatindividuals and private corporations tend to act in their oen shot-term economic and political interest, not on behalf of the environment or the public at large .For example ,current technology makes possible the complete elimination of polluting emissions from automobiles.Admittedly,government penalties do not guarantee compliance with environmental regulations.Businesses often attemptto avoid compliance by concealing their activities, lobbying legislators to modify regulations, or moving operations to jurisdictions that allow their environmentally harmful activities.Others calculate the cost of polluting ,in terms of punishment, then budget in advance for anticipated penalties and openly violate the law. However, this behavior only serves to underscore the need for government intervention,because left unfettered this type of behavior would only exacerbate environmental problems.One must admit as well that government regulation,environmental or otherwise,is fraught with bureaucratic and enforcement problems.Regulatory systems inherently call for legislative committees,investigations, and enforcement agencies,all of which add to the tax burden on the citizens whom these regulations are designed to protect .Also ,delays typically associated with bureaucratic regulation seems necessary .Finally, environmental issues inherently involve public health and are far too pandemic in nature for individuals to solve on their own.Many of the most egregious environmental violations traverse state and sometimes national borders.Individuals have neither the power nor the resources to address these widespread hazards.In the final analysis, only the authority and scope of power that a government possesses can ensure the attainment of agreed-upon environmental goals. Because individuals are unable and businesses are by nature unwilling to assume this responsibility, government must do so.。

54、Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, because there is no evidence that the humans had any significant contact with the mammals. Further, archaeologists have discovered numerous sites where the bones of fish had been discarded, but they found no such areas containing the bones of large mammals, so the humans cannot have hunted the mammals. Therefore, some climate change or other environmental factor must have caused the species' extinctions. In this argument the speaker concludes that humans could not have been a factor in the extinction of large mammal species in the Kaliko islands 3,000 years ago. To justify this conclusion, the speaker points out that no evidence exists that humans hunted or had other significant contact with these mammals. The speaker also points out that while archeologists have found bones of discarded fish in the islands, they have not found any discarded mammal bones there. For three reasons, this evidence lends little credibility to the speaker's argument. First, the argument concludes too hastily that humans could not have had any significant contact with these mammals. In relying on the lack of physical evidence such as bones, the speaker overlooks the possibility that humans exported mammals--particularly their bones--during this time period. Without ruling out this alternative explanation for the disappearance of these species from the islands, the speaker cannot justify the conclusion that humans were not a factor in their extinction from the islands. Secondly, the argument relies on the assumption that without significant contact with these other species humans could not have been a factor in their extinction. But the speaker provides no evidence that this is the case. Moreover, perhaps humans drove these other species away from their natural habitat not by significant contact but merely by intruding on their territory. Or perhaps humans consumed the plants and animals on which these species relied for their subsistence. Either scenario would explain how humans could have been a factor in the extinction of these species despite a lack of significant contact. Thirdly, the speaker assumes that the bones of fish that archeologists have found discarded on the island were discarded by humans, and not by some other large mammal. However, the speaker provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Given other possible explanations for these discarded fish bones, this evidence in itself lends little credible support to the speaker's theory about the extinction of large species of mammals.In conclusion, the argument is unconvincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the speakermust rule out the possibility that humans exported the bones of these other species. To betterevaluate the argument, we would need more information about the diet of humans and ofthe now-extinct mammals during that time period; particularly, we would need to knowwhether those other mammals also fed on the fish whose discarded bones have been foundon the islands. introduction部分有这两句话就够了这段的攻击不够清晰 作者其实想攻击的是因果关系 因为猎杀，所以没有关系这段是攻击偷换概念，没有明显的联系，不代表没有联系这两个理由都比较合理这个是因果错误鱼骨头不一定是人丢弃的，所以没有找到大型哺乳动物的骨头说明不了任何问题文章整体语言表达流畅但是对逻辑错误的攻击不是特别到位 - 建议大家要从两个细节上来证明作者的逻辑不够清晰同时，对逻辑错误的选择也不是最优的，与其攻击鱼骨头的来源，不如攻击鱼骨头和大型哺乳动物的比较错误：由于骨头特点的不一样，所以人们可能会丢弃鱼骨头，但是会拿大型动物的骨头做武器，或盖房子，所以找不到这篇文章结构是大家需要学习的重点，但是正如我们上课讲到的，逻辑是大家需要提升的重点，所以我们会找出文章中所以的逻辑有点和缺点。

人类与环境的英文作文英文：As a human being, I believe that we have aresponsibility to protect the environment. We need to take care of the planet we live on and ensure that it remains habitable for future generations. There are many ways in which we can do this, such as reducing our carbon footprint, conserving water, and recycling.One of the biggest threats to the environment isclimate change. We need to take action to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and slow down the rate of global warming. This can be achieved through a combination of individual and collective efforts, such as using renewable energy sources and supporting policies that promote sustainability.Another important issue is the conservation of biodiversity. We need to protect endangered species andtheir habitats, as well as preserve the natural resources that sustain life on Earth. This requires a commitment to sustainable development and responsible stewardship of the environment.Overall, I believe that our relationship with the environment is one of interdependence. We rely on thenatural world for our survival and well-being, and in turn, we have a responsibility to ensure its health and vitality. By working together to protect the environment, we can create a better future for ourselves and for generations to come.中文：作为一个人类，我认为我们有责任保护环境。

2024年GRE范文精讲：北美GRE范文精讲GRE作为北美地区研究生入学考试之一，是全球多所顶尖大学的研究生入学申请必备考试之一。

在2024年的GRE考试中，各位考生需要掌握的范围不仅包括基础的数学运算和英语语法知识，还需要对一些热门话题有深刻的了解和思考。

本篇文章将帮助各位考生精讲2024年北美GRE范文，希望能够帮助你顺利通过GRE考试。

Issue Essay2024年GRE考试的Issue Essay题目如下："Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Students should take courses such as philosophy, history and literature, regardless of their majors. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?"这个Issue Essay写作题目，主要是考察考生对高等教育的理解和对多元化知识的重视。

以下是一份优秀范文：Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. While students often enter college with a particular major in mind, they may not have a well-rounded education or the necessary skills to succeed in their future careers if they only take classes in their field. Thus, I strongly agree with the statement that a student’s education and training should encompass a range of disciplines, including such subjects as philosophy, history, and literature.First and foremost, a broad array of course work provides students with a more comprehensive worldview. In college courses, students who hold differing viewpoints are often interacting for the first time. The liberal arts classes provide a platform for them todiscuss differences in a respectful manner and gain a perspective on cultures and viewpoints from instructors and classmates who they may never have otherwise met. This will help a student broaden their perspective and will help create well-rounded individuals.Secondly, courses outside a student’s major often have a strong academic connection to that major. For example, philosophy isclosely tied to the field of computer science. In the area ofartificial intelligence, there are significant debates about the ethics of using such technology. Studying philosophy can help computer students understand the responsible ways of practice for technology. Enrolling in various classes may help build specific skills and provide a wider range of knowledge that will be useful in their future careers.Finally, courses outside the student's field of study may challenge them in ways that they had not previously experienced. When a course is introduced, students have to learn new skills and adapt to newmethods. This may increase their science skills by introducing problem-solving methods that are different from those they have been taught to use before. In this way, they are trained and equipped for tackling difficult challenges in real life situations later on.In conclusion, despite the potential of a narrower focus for a specialised major, mandatory coursework outside of the chosen field of study serves to increase the breadth of knowledge, allow for a more integrated prespective on important academic concepts and to also provide an opportunity for students to challenge themselveswith new experiences. Therefore, each student should mandatory take a variety of diverse courses outside of their declared major. Argument Essay2024年GRE考试的Argument Essay题目如下："According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced a system in which teachers closely monitored students. Under that system, teachers reported an average of thirty cases of cheating per year. In the first year that the honor code was in place at Groveton, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey, a majority of Groveton students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without. Thus, all colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's in order to decrease cheating among students."这个Argument Essay写作题目，主要是考察考生对“荣誉制度”对于减少学生作弊的看法和理解。

英语考试作文GRE写作Issue部分精品素材分享之自然生存状态想要在GRE作文部分的考试中写出优秀的文章，论据素材是重要的一环。

好的论据不仅能帮助你支撑观点，加强说服力，还能体现出考生在阅读量上的积累和深厚扎实的语言功底基础。

特别是ISSUE作文，更是需要大量好素材作为储备，才能保证考生无论遭遇那种题目，都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的写作。

为大家整理了GRE ISSUE作文各类题目的精品优质素材，一起来看吧。

卢梭观点：自然生存状态Rousseau maintained that human beings were essentially good and equal in the State of Nature, but were corrupted by the introduction of property, agriculture, science, and commerce. People entered into a social contract among themselves, establishing governments and educational systems to correct the inequalities brought about by the rise of civilization.All of the differences in Rousseau‟s theories, when compared to Locke, begin with different interpretations of the State of Nature. Locke believed that most people got along pretty well for the most part by rational intuition, but there were always a few bad apples in the group that forced others to give up their natural rights in a law system in order to be able to punish the exceptions in the society. Rousseau criticizes Locke by saying that he wasn‟t really looking at the real State of Nature and that all of the negative qualities of human beings that he had mentioned to be present in the State of Nature were, in fact, a quality brought on by the state of his time.Rousseau‟s version of the State of Nature differs greatly from Locke‟s, in which he made no mention of the constant fear which would control man‟s life in the state of Nature. Rather, he described the State of Nature as pleasant and peaceful. He described the people in this primitive state as living free, healthy, honest and happy lives, and felt that man was timid, and would always avoid conflict, rather than seek it out. So why a form of social organization? Rousseau asked. He recognized simply, that it would be impossible for man to shake the society and return to a State of Nature.无政府主义观点：自然生存状态Now for the least popular view of all, the anarchist view. It is the most optimistic view of all because it simply states that the State of Nature would be the best state to live in, and that a state would not be necessary. Anarchists view that there are no rotten apples. So far as there are rotten apples in the society, they are the a creation of the government. Anarchists propose that governments are a cause of anti-social behavior, even though they are created in order to remedy it. In the anarchist‟s system, the anti-social person will be abandoned, in a sense left out of the cooperative society. In the anarchist‟s view, people become perfected because they become cooperative and non-aggressive. But if there were bad apples in a state of anarchism, wouldn‟t they become a threat to the society if their anti-social behaviors lead to violence? And it leads to even more questions of insecurity like: without coercion or authority, would people obey the law or does the threat of punishment work to promote more crimes? Would you want to live in a society where there were no punishments for crimes? Maybe public opinion would be enough to keep the society in line. There is always a lot to think about and the arguments go around in circles forever, just because no systemworks out to be perfect because, there are arguments for every gap or flaw in every rule or theory.But anyhow, in the State of Nature, people generally become cooperative, and smart enough to try and keep the peace and order. Sure, people are concerned with their own interests, but they are rational enough to think of ways for reaching their interests without causing conflict with others. After all, keeping peace with people would be a self interest.苏格拉底观点：民主是有缺陷的体系Socrates held highly critical view of the democracy. Socrates believed that democracy was a flawed system, because it left the state in the hands of the unenlightened and it valued all opinions as equal.Socrates believed it was his duty to stand for the law and justice despite the wishes of The Assembly, and this could cost him his life. Socrates stated to obey the laws of the State, only if they are just. It could be said that Socrates ‟s views on democracy and justice is what ultimately led to his death. Socrates believed poor leaders were chosen, simply on their basis of their rhetoric ability, not on their ethics or character.He opposed the efforts of the Sophists to teach their students virtue, knowledge and rhetoric as practical subjects needed by citizens to participate in the institutions of Athenian democracy. Hisbelief on knowledge and virtue was that these required absolute definitions were to be attained through exhaustive philosophical dialogue and debate. He seemed to offend many Athenians with his negative dialectic method, revealing people‟s ignorance and inability to give definitions of truth and virtue. He believed the citizen‟s lack of knowledge made it impossible for the citizens to vote properly for their leaders or for the leaders themselves to even run.。

关于居住条件的英语作文Living Conditions。

Living conditions play a crucial role in determining the quality of life. A good living environment not only provides physical comfort but also promotes mental well-being. In this essay, we will discuss the importance of living conditions and how it affects individuals and society as a whole.Firstly, a good living condition ensures the physical health of individuals. This includes access to clean water, proper sanitation, and adequate housing. Without these basic necessities, people are at risk of contracting diseases and suffering from poor health. In addition, a safe and secure living environment is essential for the overall well-being of individuals. This includes living in a neighborhood with low crime rates and having access to emergency services in case of any unforeseen circumstances.Furthermore, a good living condition promotes mental well-being. A clean and organized living space can have a positive impact on an individual's mental health. It provides a sense of comfort and security, which isessential for reducing stress and anxiety. In addition, access to green spaces and recreational facilities can also contribute to a healthier lifestyle and overall happiness.Moreover, living conditions can have a significant impact on society as a whole. A well-maintained and vibrant community can foster a sense of belonging and social cohesion. This can lead to stronger social ties and a more cohesive society. On the other hand, poor living conditions can lead to social isolation and a breakdown of community spirit. This can have negative consequences for the overall well-being of society.In conclusion, living conditions are of utmost importance for individuals and society as a whole. It is essential to ensure that everyone has access to a safe, clean, and comfortable living environment. This can have a positive impact on physical health, mental well-being, andsocial cohesion. Therefore, it is crucial for governments and communities to prioritize improving living conditions for all. Only by doing so can we create a healthier and happier society for everyone.。

生存环境的英语作文The Importance of Preserving Our Living Environment.Our living environment is crucial to our existence and well-being. It encompasses not only the physical spaces where we reside but also the natural resources that sustain us. Preserving our living environment is essential for maintaining a healthy, sustainable, and prosperous life for future generations.The health of our environment directly affects our health. Clean air, pure water, and fertile soil are essential for human life. However, anthropogenic activities such as industrialization, urbanization, and deforestation have taken a heavy toll on our environment. Air pollution, water pollution, and soil degradation are some of the major consequences of these activities. These environmental issues not only affect our health but also contribute to climate change and global warming.Climate change is one of the most pressing issues ofour time. Rising temperatures, melting ice caps, extreme weather events, and sea level rise are just some of the consequences of climate change. These changes not onlyaffect our environment but also have profound implications for our economy and society. For instance, agricultural production may be affected by changing climate patterns, leading to food scarcity and price fluctuations. Coastal cities may be inundated by rising sea levels, displacing millions of people.Preserving our living environment is crucial for mitigating the impacts of climate change. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting renewable energy, and adopting sustainable practices are some of the key steps we need to take. We must also protect our natural resources by conserving forests, protecting wildlife habitats, and managing our water resources responsibly.In addition to mitigating the impacts of climate change, preserving our living environment is also essential for promoting sustainable development. Sustainable developmentensures that our economic, social, and environmental needs are met without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It involves adopting practices that are environmentally friendly, socially equitable, and economically viable.For instance, promoting green technologies and renewable energy can help reduce our dependency on fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Investing in public transportation and infrastructure for walking and cycling can reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. Encouraging waste reduction, recycling, and composting can help conserve our resources and reduce waste.Preserving our living environment also involves promoting environmental education and awareness. Educating people about the importance of protecting our environment and encouraging them to adopt sustainable practices can help create a more environmentally conscious society. It is only through collective effort and action that we can preserve our living environment and ensure a sustainable future for ourselves and our planet.In conclusion, preserving our living environment is crucial for our health, well-being, and future prosperity. It involves addressing environmental issues such as pollution and climate change, promoting sustainable practices, and educating people about the importance of protecting our environment. By taking these steps, we can mitigate the impacts of climate change, promote sustainable development, and ensure a healthy, prosperous, and sustainable future for ourselves and our planet.。