《亚洲两爬动物研究》(SCI,英文)投稿指南

论文投稿邮件,模板篇一：科学杂志投稿邮件格式尊敬的编辑先生/女士：您好！本人受所有作者委托，在此提交完整的论文《低铝硅比铝土矿降铁、脱硅试验研究》，希望能够在《化工矿物与加工》杂志发表，并且代表所有作者郑重申明：（1）论文成果属于原创，享有自主知识产权，不涉及保密问题；（2）相关内容未曾以任何语种在国内外公开发表过，没有一稿多投行为；（3）今后关于论文内容及作者的任何修改，均由本人负责通知其他作者知晓。

本人对上述各项负完全责任。

论文的主要内容简介：以某地铝土矿为研究对象，为了实现低铝硅比铝土矿降铁、降硅的目的，通过试验研究确定采用磁选和浮选联合工艺流程，试验研究获得较好的工艺指标。

原矿铝硅比为，磁选和浮选联合工艺流程获得的选矿指标为铝土矿精矿铝硅比为，Al2O3的回收率为%，精矿中铁的含量为%。

本论文的创新点在于：采用磁选和浮选联合工艺流程，试验研究获得较好的工艺指标，实现低铝硅比铝土矿降铁、降硅的目的非常感谢您审阅本论文，期待早日收到专家的审查意见。

若对于本论文有任何疑问，请及时与我联系。

遵照《中华人民共和国著作权法》，作者同意将该文版权（含各种介质的版权）转让给《化工矿物与加工》编辑部。

编辑部一次性向作者付清稿酬。

此致敬礼！投稿人：xx身份证号：所有作者姓名：xx ，出生年月：1990-06-20 ，学历：硕士生，研究方向：矿物分选，联系电话 xx，E-mail：xx篇二：投稿信投稿信尊敬的编辑先生/女士：您好！本人受所有作者委托，在此提交完整的论文《基于改进粒子群优化算法和混沌神经网络的电力系统负荷预测》，希望能够在《电网技术》杂志发表，并且代表所有作者郑重申明：（1）关于该论文，所有作者均已通读并同意投往贵刊，对作者排序没有异议，不存在利益冲突及署名纠纷；（2）论文成果属于原创，享有自主知识产权，不涉及保密问题；（3）相关内容未曾以任何语种在国内外公开发表过，没有一稿多投行为；（4）今后关于论文内容及作者的任何修改，均由本人负责通知其他作者知晓。

分享到QQ空间新浪微博腾讯微博人人网小木虫 | 考研考博题库 | SCI期刊点评 | 中文期刊点评 | 论文范文 | 每日热点新闻设为首页 | 加入收藏我的短消息 我的主页 我的淘贴 我的话题 我的记事本 我的研究方向 | 站内搜索 找人 有奖邀请好友 个人设置 退出 kingwei (金币: 19 , 铜虫 升级)硕博家园 教师之家 博后之家 找工作交流 招聘布告栏 考研 考博 公务员考试 外语学习 English Cafe | 文献求助 外文书籍求助 标准与专利 检索知识 代理Proxy资源 论文投稿 SCI期刊点评 中文期刊点评 论文道贺 基金申请 会议交流 会议布告 科研经验 翻译 | 海外院所 留学生活 公派出国 访问学者 海外博后 留学DIY 签证指南 出国考试 有机交流 有机资源 SciFinder/Reaxys 高分子 分析 电化学 催化 环境 工艺技术 化工设备 石油化工 精细化工 无机/物化 | 读书频道 人文学科 财经 管理 法学 | 小木虫故事 微米和纳米 晶体 功能材料 复合材料 金属 无机非金属 生物材料 材料工程师 材料综合 | 生物科学 分子生物 微生物 动植物 药学 新药研发 医学 | 帖子排行热榜 用户排行热榜 机械 物理 数学 农林 食品 地学 能源 信息科学 土木建筑 | 第一性原理 量子化学 分子模拟 仿真模拟 计算模拟 程序语言 | 我的个性化订阅 精彩淘贴 领取今日金币红包 休闲灌水 有奖问答 虫友互识 家有宝宝 影音娱乐 游戏玩家 健康生活 文学芳草园 跳蚤市场 | 电子书资源 软件下载 科研工具 课件资源 科研资料 试题资源 资源求助 电脑求助 科研市场： 创业与合作 | 布告栏： 求购信息 试剂耗材 仪器设备 测试/定制/合成 技术服务 | 我的科研家族 QQ群专版 彩蛋幸运星 木虫之家 | 站务公告 我来提意见 版主交流 SW论文三审翻译 SW英文论文修改 SW留学文书润色 ES英文论文修改 | 去旅游吧 | 超值优惠大学酒店 | 美团每日大抽奖哦 | 捐助我们 木虫名人堂 木虫VIP荣誉小木虫论坛 » 材料区 » 微米和纳米 » 资源交流 » 查看主题内容广告19 1/2 返回列表 1 2 下一页全部1.前沿热点2.学术讨论3.合成表征4.性能应用5.微纳加工6.微纳器件7.资源交流8.文献赏析9.综合其他 10.版内事务 11.资源区12.精华区13.材料综合材料工程师微米和纳米晶体金属无机非金属生物材料功能材料复合材料>> 搜索本版搜索本版 [热点] 《科学的旅程》 【原创】 科研人必读的一本书 (更多)通知他人查看此贴 | 推广此贴 | 新回复通知我(取消) | 浏览器收藏 | 论坛收藏【奖励】 本帖被会员评价7次，作者bnuxin增加金币 6.8 个bnuxin铜虫 (小有名气)金币: 290.5帖子: 134[资源]【资源】施一公谈学生如何阅读和写作论文 已有7人参与 ★ ★ ★ ★小木虫(金币+1):奖励一下，鼓励发有价值的话题mhwu514(金币+3):感谢分享~！改成资源帖吧 2010-08-11 09:38:44虫号: 712813注册: 2009-03-02活跃: 2011-12-02状态: 离线专业: 无机纳米化学施一公先生写的学生如何阅读论文和提高写作能力我感觉很好，欢迎大家讨论，呵呵/m/user_content.aspx?id=350496【 序：此文针对本科生和一、二年级的博士、硕士生，对高年级的博士生和博士后也应该有参考价值。

Author GuidelinesEditorial Office contact detailsGCB BioenergyUniversity of Illinois144 Institute for Genomic Biology1206 West Gregory DriveUrbana, IL 61801-3838USATel. +1-217-333-9651Fax +1-217-244-3637E-mail: gcb-bioenergy@Online manuscript submissionSubmit your manuscript electronically to GCB Bioenergy through ScholarOne Manuscripts.Overview of the Editorial ProcessAll submitted manuscripts will be processed through plagiarism detection software. In submitting your manuscript you accept that it may be screened against previously published literature. Plagiarized manuscripts will be rejected immediately.GCB Bioenergy is committed to rapid evaluation and publication of submitted papers. To this end, we strive to return the Editor's decision and reviewer comments within 30 days of submission and to publish papers online within 30 days of receipt of the final version of the manuscript and all necessary files and forms.In order to achieve this, manuscript review is now based on a two-stage process.•During the first stage, manuscripts are assigned to appropriate members of the Editorial Board who determine if the manuscript should be sent for peer-review. This decision is based on the submission questions andabstract. In 2013, the average time for this stage was 5 days and 78% of manuscript progressed to the second stage.•During second stage, manuscripts are assessed by two or three independent reviewers. The final decision is made by the Subject Editor.In 2013, the average time for stage two was 35 days. In 2013, 42% ofsubmitted manuscripts were accepted for publication.• A decision letter will be emailed to the corresponding author once the Subject Editor has made his or her decision.•If at any time during the review process the corresponding author has a question regarding the status of a manuscript or the nature of the peerreview process, he or she should contact the Editorial Office.The typesetter will notify the corresponding author via e-mail to electronically retrieve page proofs approximately 4 weeks after the final version of the manuscript and all necessary files and forms are received by the Editorial Office. After the proofs are corrected, the article will appear on EarlyView until it is assigned to an issue.Types of papersGCB Bioenergy will consider the following manuscript types:Original ResearchOriginal Research Articles present the results of a completed research project and are up to 8000 words in length. Word limits apply to the main body of the text (Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Acknowledgements). Formatting is standard (see Formatting Instructions, below). These are peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors.Technical Advances present exciting new research tools, methods, and techniques, including new modeling approaches, and should include a detailed description of the methodological design and discussion of how this technique improves the study of global change biology. GCB has a wide readership; accordingly the technical advance broadly applicable. Papers describing methods that apply to one species or system are unlikely to meet our criteria unless authors are able to show that their methods can be generalized. The abstract must be less than 150 words and the main body word limit is 4000 words (Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results & Discussion, and Acknowledgements). Formatting is standard (see Formatting Instructions, below) except that Results and Discussion may be combined. These are peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors.Comment and ReviewResearch Reviews examine a defined specialist subject that is of topical interest. Reviews should begin with an introduction, followed by up to 10 headings following a logically developed plan, and end with a Conclusion, tables, figure legends and figures. Reviews should be no more than 8000words (count includes Introduction, body, Conclusions and Acknowledgements). These are peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors.Opinions are usually a review or re-analysis that challenges prevailing views on a topical issue. These may include emerging frameworks arising from a synthesis of recent research, alternative interpretations of a field of research, controversial perspectives on current areas of research of high interest, or reason the need for a new direction in research. This list is not exclusive and the Editors are interested to hear of other ideas. While this category of article is designed to allow expression of viewpoints that may run counter to established viewpoints, articles must be anchored in sound reasoning developed from the peer-reviewed literature. The article must be sufficiently complete to convince reviewers of the value of the contribution. Articles that are essentially reviewing a topic, a statement of opinion not reasoned from the peer-reviewed literature, arguing for redirection of government funding for research and those primarily discussing the authors’ own work will not be considered. Opinions articles should begin with an Introduction, followed by a body with up to 6 headings, and end with a Conclusion, tables, figure legends and figures. Opinion articles should be no more than 4000 words and have no more than 8 tables and figures. These are peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors. Authors interested in submitting an Opinion should first send a one-paragraph proposal (300 words) to the Editorial Office.Reports are expert scientific reports which outline the direction of a relevant research area, integrated experimental network, etc. Reports should begin with an abstract and introduction, followed by up to 20 headings, and end with a Conclusion and/or Recommendations, table, figure legends and figures. Reports should be no more than 8000 words (count includes Introduction, body, Conclusions and Acknowledgements). These are peer reviewed at the Editor’s discretion. Decisions are made by the Editors.Authors interested in submitting a Report should first send a one-paragraph proposal (300 words) to the Editorial Office.Platforms are structured authoritative reviews of a specific feedstock , e.g. switchgrass, Jatropha, or algae. These will describe the organism being used or potentially used by the biofuels industry, its origin, culture, issues, sources of genomic information, genetic resources, transformation systems, environmental risk assessment and environmental benefits, and in the case of crops, where they may be grown and what yields may be expected. There is an urgent demand for information on a range of organisms that have been little used in the past, but appear to have large potential. Platforms should begin with an introduction, followed by up to 10 headings following a logically developed plan, and end with a Conclusion, tables, figure legends and figures. Platforms should be no more than 8000 words (count includesIntroduction, body, Conclusions and Acknowledgements). These are peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors.Legislative Issues and Policy Developments are authoritative reviews that deal with existing, proposed legislation or voluntary compliance with agreed codes of conduction (e.g. Green Certificates) affecting the development of biological R&D and deployment of biofuel systems. For example: How does the Biodiversity Convention affect use of novel organisms and genes in making better biofuels? How will proposed EU or US Farm Bills affect the development of new crops? What are the implications of widespread deployment of different biofuels systems for the IPCC? Policy commentaries should begin with an introduction, followed by up to 10 headings and end with a Conclusion, tables, figure legends and figures. They should be no more than 8000 words long.Editorial and Front MaterialEditorials are a commentary from an Editor or Guest Editor on an important development in the Journal or background to a SI or VSI. They have the following sections: body, references, tables, figure legends and figures. They should include no more than 2 tables and figures, 10 references, and be no more than 500 words. These are not peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors. Editorials may be submitted by invitation only.Editorial Commentaries are a discussion of recent exciting research or in-depth analysis of topic issues including meetings. Opinions are welcome as long as they are factually based. Commentaries only have the following sections: body, references, tables, figure legends and figures. They should include no more than 2 tables and figures and 10 references, and be no more than 1000 words (count includes body and Acknowledgements). These are not peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors.Letters to the Editor are a short discussion of articles recently published articles or topical issues presenting an alternative or well-reasoned challenge to an article of relevance to the journal. Opinions are welcome as long as they are factually based. Letters only have the following sections: body, reference, tables, figure legends and figures. They should include no more than 2 tables and figures and 10 references, and be no more than 800 words (count includes body and Acknowledgements). If a letter is accepted for publication it will be provided to the authors of the original article (when appropriate) so that they may have an opportunity to provide a Response to the Editor. These are not peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors.Response to the Editor is a response to a Letter to the Editor. Opinions are welcome as long as they are factually based. Responses only have the following sections: body, reference, tables, figure legends and figures. Theyshould include no more than 2 tables and figures and 10 references, and be no more than 500 words (count includes body and Acknowledgements). These are not peer reviewed. Decisions are made by the Editors.Pre-submission English-language editingAuthors for whom English is a second language may choose to have their manuscript professionally edited before submission to improve its grammar, spelling, punctuation, and clarity. Visit Wiley-Blackwell's site to learn about the options. All services are paid for and arranged by the author, and use of one of these services does not guarantee acceptance or preference for publication.Conflict of InterestWiley-Blackwell requires that all authors disclose any potential sources of conflict of interest. Any interest or relationship, financial or otherwise, that might be perceived as influencing an author’s objectivity is considered a potential source of conflict of interest. These must be disclosed when directly relevant or indirectly related to the work that the authors describe in their manuscript. Potential sources of conflict of interest include but are not limited to patent or stock ownership, membership of a company board of directors, membership of an advisory board or committee for a company, and consultancy for or receipt of speaker’s fees from a company. The existence of a conflict of interest does not preclude publication in this journal. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to review this policy with all authors and to collectively list in the manuscript (under the Acknowledgments section), and in the online submission system ALL pertinent commercial and other relationships. Corresponding authors will be asked to confirm whether or not a conflict of interest exists as part of the submission process.Instructions for Authors1. Compile the electronic version of your manuscript according to the instructions below.2. Gather the following information which will be necessary to complete your submission:Contact information for all authors• First name, middle initial and last name• Postal address• E-mail addressName and e-mail address of 3-5 suggested reviewers. While these selections may be taken into account, the final selection is subject to the Editor'sdiscretion. These suggestions must be without a conflict of interest with the authors including former or current coauthors (within the past 4 years), students, mentors and members of the same academic institution. Authors may also indicate up to three non-preferred referees.Answers to the following questions (max 50 words per answer). Please take time to prepare your answers to these questions; this information may be used to determine if the manuscript should progress to stage two of the review process.• What is the scientific question you are addressing?• What is/are the key finding(s) that answers this question?• What are the three most recently published papers that are relevant to this question?• Why is this work important and timely?• Does your paper fall within the scope of GCBB; what biological AND bioenergy aspects does it address? Policy papers do not need to contain biological aspects.• Provide information about suggested and non-preferred reviewers including their area of research and how it relates to your paper. Also provide justification for why you do not prefer certain reviewers.• Provide justification for any non-conformance to author guidelines and/or formatting3. Use the submission checklist as a guide to ensure that files are correctly prepared for submission.4. Submit your manuscript and cover letter electronically through the GCB Bioenergy ScholarOne Manuscripts site. Enter the Author Center and click'Click here to submit a new manuscript'. The instructions at the top of the screens will guide you through the submission process.FormatManuscripts may be submitted in the following file formats: Microsoft Word or Corel WordPerfect, Rich Text Format or Post Script (NOT a pdf).All pages should be numbered consecutively, starting with 1 for the title page and including those containing acknowledgements, references, tables and figure legends. Manuscripts must be page size letter (8.5 x 11 inch) or A4 (210 x 297 mm) with margins of at least 2.5 cm. Lines must be double-spaced and text must be in Times New Roman font, 12 point. English spelling should conform to The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Both American and British English are acceptable, but must be consistent.SectionsPrimary Research Articles should be arranged as follows, with each section beginning on a separate page. Manuscripts in other categories should be modified appropriately.1. Title pagei. Title: this should be concise and informativeii. Running title: no more than 45 characters, including spacesiii. List of authorsiv. Institute or laboratory of origin: Where authors have different addresses, use numbered superscripts to refer to each address providedv. Corresponding author: include their telephone, fax and email detailsvi. Keywords: 6 – 10 key words or short phrases to enable retrieval and indexing by searching techniques. Authors are encouraged to include scientific names, common names, and pseudonyms that are not mentioned in the title.vii. Type of Paper2. AbstractThis should provide a concise statement of the motivation for the work done, the scope of the work and the principal findings. The abstract should be less than 300 words for Primary Research Articles and Reviews, and 150 words for Technical Advances and Opinion. Commentaries and Letters do not contain abstracts.3. IntroductionThis should argue the case for your study, outlining only essential background, but should not include either the findings or the conclusions. It should not be a review of the subject area, but should finish with a clear statement of the question being addressed.4. Materials and methodsThis should allow replication of all experiments described and demonstrate the validity of those experiments for the research being conducted.5. ResultsThis should not include material appropriate to the Discussion section. Platforms, Reviews, Commentaries and Letters do not have Results sections.6. DiscussionThis should highlight the significance of the results and place them in the context of other work. It should not introduce new material, be over-speculative, reiterate the results, or exceed 20% of the total length. The Results and Discussion sections may be combined for Technical Advances papers. A Conclusion replaces the Results and Discussion section for Reviews and Platforms.7. ConclusionsOnly Reviews and Platforms may have conclusions sections. All other article types should incorporate any conclusions into the Discussion section, and should not include a "Conclusions" subheading.8. Acknowledgements9. ReferencesThe number of references is limited for Commentaries and Letters (max 10). The reference list should be in alphabetical order and include the full title with the name of the journal given in full. When there are eight or more authors only the first three should be listed, following the et al.Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M et al. (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Global Change Biology, 16, 3304–3313.George DG, Hewitt DP (1998) The influence of year-to-year changes in position of the Atlantic Gulf Stream on the biomass of zooplankton in Windermere North Basin, UK. In: Management of Lakes and Reservoirs During Global Climate Change (eds George DG, Jones JG, Puncochar P, Reynolds CS, Sutcliffe DW), pp. 223–244, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE), PP.81–82. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Rotter RP (1993) Simulation of the biophysical limitations to maize production under rainfed conditions in Kenya: evaluation and application of the model WOFOST. PhD Thesis. University of Trier, Germany.When there are more than two authors, use the first author followed by "et al". Use commas between the author and date of publication, and to separate different publications by the same author. Semicolons separate citations of different authors. Cite two or more publications by different authors in chronological sequence, from the earliest to latest. For example:(Cramer et al., 2012)(Shanley & Chalmers, 2012; Marchard, 2013)(Lindroth et al., 2012, 2013)(Duran et al., 2012; Robertson et al., 2013)We recommend to visit the following hyperlink / for reference management and formatting.10. Supporting Information legendsShort legend for each supporting information file.11. TablesEach table should be on a separate page, numbered, and accompanied by an explanatory caption. Each table must be referred to in the text. Tables must be in editable Word or Excel format (NOT embedded in picture format). Data must not be presented in both tabular and graphical form.12. Figure legendsLegends should be typed on a separate sheet. Enough detail should be given so that the figure can be understood without reference to the text. In the full-text online edition of the journal. figure legends may be truncated in abbreviated links to the full screen version. Therefore, the first 100 characters of any legend should inform the reader of key aspects of the figure. If you wish to publish figures in color online and grayscale in print, figure legends should be appropriate for both color and grayscale versions; do not refer to colors in the figure.13. FiguresAll figures should be uploaded as separate files, with the figure number incorporated in the file name. Graphics/figures of accepted manuscripts must be 300dpi or above and in pdf, tiff or eps format. Figures should be cropped or scaled to the size intended for publication. Most figures should fit within a single (80 mm) or double column width (169 mm). Figure panels should be labeled with lower case, bold letters in parentheses (e.g. (a), (b)) and referred to in the text in the form Fig. 1a, Fig. 1a,b.Figures can be published (1) in color both in the online journal and in the printed journal, (2) in color online and grayscale in print, or (3) grayscale both in the online journal and in the printed journal. Online color is free; authors will be charged for color in print (currently £150 for the first figure, £50 thereafter). The Color Work Agreement Form should be completed in all instances where authors require color, whether in print or online. The form is not required for color figures that are part of online Supporting Information. If you wish to publish figures in color online and grayscale in print, you are responsible for ensuring that color figures are understandable when converted to grayscaleand that text references and captions and figure legends are appropriate for both online and print versions.Diagrams and graphs should appear on a white background, with black axis lines 0.25 mm thick enclosing the graph. Axes should be clearly marked with units in parentheses after the axis title. Scale/tick marks on graphs should be inside the axes. Only 5-7 ticks should be labeled per axis. Font should be black, Times, Times New Roman, Arial or Helvetica type, and 8-11 pt when scaled to print size.The preferred symbols are open and closed circles, squares, triangles. Symbols should be 3 mm across. Data lines should be 0.5 mm thick. The same symbol and color should be used for the same entity in different figures. Legends may be used and should be overlayed on the graph when possible. The legend should have a white background and no outline. Please consult the submission checklist(/pdf/GCBB_Submission_Checklist.pdf) or Wiley-Blackwell's Illustration Guidelines(/bauthor/illustration.asp) for more information.14. Supporting informationAppendices will not be published in print, but may be submitted as Supporting Information to be published in the online version of the article. These files are not included in the typeset manuscript, but are downloadable and fully searchable from the HTML version of the article. This material should be submitted with the original manuscript in order that it can be included in the review process. The conclusions of an Author's manuscripts should not depend on the material supplied in Supporting Information. Supporting information will be made available in exactly the same form as originally provided; it will not be copyedited or typeset.All supporting information must be referred to in the manuscript with a leading capital S (e.g., fig. S2 for the second supporting information figure). Authors should include a Supporting Information section after the references in the main article. This section consists of short captions for each supporting information file. Full captions should be included within the online supporting information file. Please see Wiley-Blackwell's Supporting Information Guidelines for more information.15. Cover imageImages suitable for the cover of the journal are particularly welcomed and should be accompanied by a suggested caption and photocredit (when appropriate). See Wiley-Blackwell's Graphics Resources for Authors for guidelines and tips.OffprintsFree access to the final PDF offprint of your article will be available via author services only. Please therefore sign up for author services if you would like to access your article PDF offprint and enjoy the many other benefits the service offers. Printed copies can be obtained at additional cost to the author. Please click on the following link, /blackwell to order online. Fill in the necessary details and ensure that you type information in all of the required fields. If you have queries about offprints, please emailoffprint@ for details.Colour Work AgreementIf you have submitted a manuscript that contains colour figures, it is the policy of the journal for authors to meet the full cost of colour reproduction (please see form for more details). Once completed, please return the form (hard copy with original signature) via regular mail to the address:Customer Services (OPI)John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Distribution CentreNew Era EstateOldlands WayBognor RegisWest SussexPO22 9NQEmail: Opi-cs@OnlineOpenOnlineOpen is available to authors of primary research articles who wish to make their article available to non-subscribers on publication, or whose funding agency requires grantees to archive the final version of their article. With OnlineOpen the author, the author's funding agency, or the author's institution pays a fee to ensure that the article is made available to non-subscribers upon publication via Wiley Online Library, as well as deposited in the funding agency's preferred archive. For the full list of terms and conditions, see /onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms.“If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the Wiley Author Licensing Service (WALS) they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.For authors signing the copyright transfer agreementIf the OnlineOpen option is not selected the corresponding author will be presented with the copyright transfer agreement (CTA) to sign. The terms and conditions of the CTA can be previewed in the samples associated with the Copyright FAQs below:CTA Terms and Conditions/bauthor/faqs_copyright.aspFor authors choosing OnlineOpenIf the OnlineOpen option is selected the corresponding author will have a choice of the following Creative Commons License Open Access Agreements (OAA):Creative Commons Attribution License OAACreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License OAACreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial -NoDerivs License OAATo preview the terms and conditions of these open access agreements please visit the Copyright FAQs hosted on Wiley Author Services/bauthor/faqs_copyright.asp and visit/details/content/12f25db4c87/Copyright--License.html.If you select the OnlineOpen option and your research is funded by The Wellcome Trust and members of the Research Councils UK (RCUK) you will be given the opportunity to publish your article under a CC-BY license supporting you in complying with Wellcome Trust and Research Councils UK requirements. For more information on this policy and the Journal’s compliant self-archiving policy pleasevisit: /go/funderstatement.”Online production tracking is now available for your article through Wiley-Blackwell's Author Services at /bauthor/. Author services enables authors to track their article - once it has been accepted - through the production process to publication online and in print. Authors can check the status of their articles online and choose to receive automated e-mails at key stages of production. The author will receive an e-mail with a unique link that enables them to register and have their title automatically added to the system.Special issuesOur page budget does not allow for the publication of special issues. However, we will consider sponsored special issues with costs of publication covered by third party sponsors. All submissions to sponsored issues will undergo peer review and the final publication decision will be made by appropriate members of the editorial board. If you are interested in publishing a sponsored special issue please contact the Editorial Office.。

international journal of biological markers投稿指南1. 引言1.1 概述本篇长文旨在为作者们提供投稿指南，以便他们参与《International Journal of Biological Markers》杂志的投稿。

该杂志专注于生物标志物领域的研究，涵盖了生物分子、细胞活性和功能参数等多个方面。

1.2 文章结构本文将按照以下顺序进行阐述：引言、正文、研究方法、结果与讨论、结论。

其中，引言部分旨在提供对文章内容的总体概述，让读者对研究主题和目的有一个清晰的认识。

1.3 目的本文的目的在于向作者们解释并指导他们如何撰写适合投稿到《International Journal of Biological Markers》杂志的文章。

我们将详细介绍每个章节应包括哪些内容，并提供相应的写作建议和格式要求。

注：接下来是正文部分，请回答“2. 正文”的内容。

2. 正文2.1 背景介绍在这一部分，我们将对生物标记物的概念和意义进行介绍。

生物标记物是指可以确认某种生物过程、疾病状态或药物反应的具体分子、基因、代谢产物等特征性指标。

它们在临床诊断、疾病预测和治疗方面有重要的作用，因此对于生物标记物的研究和开发具有重要意义。

2.2 目标市场调研在本节中，我们将进行目标市场调研，以确定我们所关注的生物标记物领域的市场规模、趋势和需求。

通过调查已有文献以及行业报告，收集相关数据并进行分析，以了解该领域的发展方向和未来发展趋势。

2.3 竞争分析本节中将进行竞争分析，评估当前市场上已有的生物标记物相关产品和服务。

我们将对竞争对手的优势和劣势进行评估，并分析他们在技术、产品特点、市场份额等方面与我们的区别。

通过这一步骤，我们可以更好地了解市场上存在的机会和挑战，并为进一步的研究和发展做出合理的决策。

以上是“2. 正文”部分的内容，希望对您的撰写有所帮助。

3. 研究方法:3.1 数据收集:在本研究中，我们采用了多种数据收集方法来获取所需的信息。

爬行类动物研究进展前言爬行动物是第一批真正摆脱对水依赖的变温脊椎动物，可以适应各种不同的陆地生活环境。

爬行动物与人类的活动密切相关。

其种类的繁多，生理结构的复杂，存在很高的生态和经济价值，已然成为科学家研究的理想对象[1]。

我国最早的甲骨文中就有爬行动物的象形文字出现，李时珍的《本草纲目》也有可以用药的爬行动物出现。

在林奈的双命名法被世人接收后，爬行动物才有了更系统的分类[2]。

爬行动物的皮肤干燥且表面覆盖着保护性的鳞片或坚硬的外壳，这使它们能离水登陆，在干燥的陆地上生活。

目前，世界上的爬行动物共有6000多种，主要有4 大类群, 即: 龟鳖目、有鳞目、鳄目和楔齿目[3]。

大多数爬行动物生活在温暖的地方，因为它们需要太阳和地热来取暖。

很多爬行动物栖居在陆地上，但是海龟、海蛇、水蛇和鳄鱼等都生活在水里。

因为爬行动物是变温动物，迁徙性小，受环境影响大，从而成为生物地理学，生物区域多样性的代表群或只是群[4]。

然而由于人类频繁的活动和自然环境的破坏，爬行动物的生存环境受到严重的威胁，大量物种濒临灭绝。

所以为了进一步保护这些动物，全球各个地方都作出来了一定的措施，如建立保护区等等。

这不仅仅是帮助爬行动物重建家园，更是关乎到人类自己的未来。

1.爬行动物的概念与特征爬行动物或称爬行类或爬虫类是一类脊椎动物，属于四目总纲的羊膜动物。

是对蜥蜴纲及合弓纲除鸟类及哺乳类以外的所有物种的通称。

包括了龟、蛇、蜥蜴、鳄及已灭绝的恐龙与似哺乳爬行动物等等。

在生物进化史上，爬行动物是最早出现的真正意义上的陆生动物。

爬行动物出现可以完全摆脱水生生活的特征，诸如：有效防止体内水分蒸发的鳞片类的角质化的皮肤；为保护内部器官和利于陆地活动，爬行动物的骨骼结构致密化和复杂化；完全使用肺部呼吸，同时出现了双循环，动静脉血分开，有效提高了代谢效率；以及神经系统、感官系统的进化。

爬行动物更关键进化是它们的生殖方式完全的改变，出现了“羊膜”这才使得爬行动物彻底拍拖对水生环境的依赖[1]。

第41卷 第5期 渔 业 科 学 进 展Vol.41, No.5 2020年10月Oct., 2020* 科技部国际创新合作专项“基于生态系统的水产养殖空间规划研究”(2016YFE0112600)和“欧盟地平线2020项目”(633476-H2020-SFS-2014-2015)共同资助 [This work was supported by the Key Programme for International Cooperation onScientific and Technological Innovation, Ministry of Science and Technology (2016YFE0112600), and Optimizing Space Available for European Aquaculture (AquaSpace) (633476-H2020-SFS-2014-2015)]. 段娇阳，E-mail:*******************① 通讯作者：刘 慧，研究员，E-mail:***************.cn 收稿日期: 2019-07-22, 收修改稿日期: 2019-08-02DOI: 10.19663/j.issn2095-9869.20190722001 /段娇阳, 刘慧, 陈四清, 蒋增杰, 蔺凡, 常丽荣, 卢龙飞. 基于DEB 理论的皱纹盘鲍个体生长模型参数的测定. 渔业科学进展, 2020, 41(5): 110–117Duan JY, Liu H, Chen SQ, Jiang ZJ, Lin F, Chang LR, Lu LF. The measurement of parameters for the dynamic energy budget (DEB) model in Haliotis discus hannai (disk abalone). Progress in Fishery Sciences, 2020, 41(5): 110–117基于DEB 理论的皱纹盘鲍个体生长模型参数的测定*段娇阳1,2 刘 慧2①陈四清2 蒋增杰2 蔺 凡2 常丽荣3 卢龙飞3(1. 上海海洋大学水产科学国家级实验教学示范中心 水产动物遗传育种中心上海市协同创新中心上海水产养殖工程技术研究中心 上海 201306；2. 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所农业农村部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室 青岛 266071；3. 威海长青海洋科技股份有限公司 荣成 264316)摘要 为获取皱纹盘鲍(Haliotis discus hannai )个体生长模型所需的6个关键参数，设计了饥饿耗能、温度对耗氧的影响等相关生理实验，计算得到各项参数值。

Table of Contents:I.General Editorial, Ethical and Legal Issues一般编辑、伦理、法律问题A.AuthorshipB.Group Authorship团体作者C.Group Collaborators合作者D.Copyright 版权E.Duplicate, Prior or Divided Publications重复的、优先的、分开的出版物F.Scientific Misconduct科学不端行为G.Human Studies: IRB Approval and Consent人体研究H.Animal Studies: Animal Care Approval动物研究：动物伦理批准I.Conflicts of Interest利益冲突pliance with NIH and Other Research Funding AgencyAccessibility Requirements符合美国国立卫生研究院和其他研究资助机构的可达性要求K.Study Design Issues实验设计1.PreClinical Trials2.Surveys调查3.Observational Studies观察性研究4.Clinical Trials临床试验II.Types of Papers论文类型A.Original Investigations原始调查B.Clinical Concepts and Commentary (CCC) Articles临床概念和评论文章C.Review Articles review文章D.Special Articles特殊文章E.Correspondence对应F.Mind to MindG.Clinical Practice Guidelines 临床指南H.Images in Anesthesiology (IiA) 图像I.Other Items其他项目III.Manuscript PreparationA.General Arrangement Information on electronic documents电子文件一般资料整理B.Title Page标题页C.Abstract (when required) 摘要D.Body Text正文E.References参考文献F.Tables表G.Appendices附录H.Figure Legends图I.Figures图1.Color Images彩图2.Preparation of Electronic Figures3.Journal Cover Figures杂志封面彩图J.Manuscripts "In Press"K.Supplemental Digital Content补充数字内容L.Additional Information附加信息1.Units of Measurement测量单位2.Abbreviations缩写3.Drug Names and Equipment药品名称和设备4.Data Reporting and Statistics数据报告和统计5.Patient Identification患者识别M.Permissions权限nguage Editing Services语言编辑服务IV.Submission of Electronic Documents提交电子文件A.File Formats, Text文件格式，B.File Formats, Fonts文本文件格式，字体C.File Formats, Graphics and Images图像和图形D.File Sizes文件大小I.General Editorial, Legal and Ethical IssuesA.AuthorshipEach manuscript must have one "Corresponding Author." Anesthesiology follows the ICMJERecommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work inMedical Journals to define the criteria required for authorship. All authors must have participated in the design, execution, and/or analysis of the work presented, and attest to the accuracy andvalidity of the contents. All persons or organizations involved in the work must be listed asauthors or acknowledged. Manuscripts are received with the understanding that they have beenwritten by the authors; ghostwritten papers are unacceptable. See Cullen D: Ghostwriting inscientific anesthesia journals. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 195-6..每个手稿都必须有相应的作者。