Argumentation议论文
- 格式:ppt
- 大小:304.00 KB
- 文档页数:20


论证方法英语作文六百字英文回答:Argumentation is a crucial aspect of academic writing that involves presenting evidence and constructing logical arguments to support a specific claim. There are various methods of argumentation, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here are some common argumentation methods:Deductive Arguments:Deductive arguments follow a logical structure wherethe conclusion is necessarily true if the premises are true. The premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion, and the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises.Inductive Arguments:Inductive arguments provide evidence that supports a general claim or conclusion. The premises are specificobservations or examples, and the conclusion is a generalization drawn from these premises. Inductive arguments are based on the assumption that what is true in the observed cases is also true in other similar cases.Analogical Arguments:Analogical arguments compare two situations or cases to draw a conclusion about one of them. The two situations are similar in relevant ways, and the conclusion is based on the assumption that what is true of one situation is also true of the other.Causal Arguments:Causal arguments establish a relationship between a cause and its effect. The evidence provided demonstrates that one event (the cause) led to another event (the effect). Causal arguments are based on the assumption that causation occurs in a regular and consistent manner.Ethical Arguments:Ethical arguments appeal to moral principles or valuesto support a position. The evidence provided consists of ethical considerations, such as fairness, justice, or human rights. Ethical arguments are based on the assumption that moral values are universally applicable.The choice of argumentation method depends on thenature of the claim, the available evidence, and the intended audience. Effective argumentation requires careful consideration of the logical structure, clarity of evidence, and persuasive presentation.中文回答:论证方法。
Chinese university students should not have a curfew In order to defend human rights, the curfew imposed on Chinese university students should be abolished because university students are adults in law and should not be treated as prisoners in jail.Some might think as a student, we’d better obey the rules, which were made by school. But what if the rules are against the elementary human rights? If so, even the United States Constitution will be modified, let alone the lovely university curfew rule. Meanwhile, our society is becoming freer and freer. So the curfew, which limits university students’freedom, is a kind of regress without doubt.Besides, the life of university students is neither a state of siege or wartime, nor prisoner in jail. So I can’t figure out a valid reason to stay in our dormitories, where mice dance happily and lights blink occasionally, for the whole night.The universities may have their own reason to make such a rule. But as far as I am concerned, we, university students, are adults in law. It is heaven-born rights to arrange our own time and activities freely. And we have sanity to handle it. That is, the curfew is unnecessary, to be exact, redundant.As we mentioned above, I believe the curfew imposed on Chinese university students need to be cancelled, because it is unnecessary and unreasonable or even limits our human rights.。