中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则2012

最新中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会《仲裁规则》的解读作者：寇立耘2014年11月18日，中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会（“贸仲”或“CIETAC”）正式颁布了其最新修订的仲裁规则，并将于2015年1月1日开始正式实施。

贸仲自2014年上半年开始酝酿此次修订，主要背景是近年来国内和国际仲裁实践均有不同程度的发展，而贸仲自身也有深化程序改革和进一步满足当事人日趋多样化的争议解决意愿的需求。

比较目前正在施行的2012版规则，我们可以发现新规则主要有以下变化：1、在仲裁委员会内部增设仲裁院，取代之前秘书局所承担的管理仲裁程序的职责；2、增加“香港仲裁的特别规定”专章，凸显贸仲作为国内首屈一指的国际仲裁机构为境内外当事人提供国际仲裁服务的能力；3、总结国内仲裁实践，有针对性地对相关条文作出明确和调整：如列举送达方式、明确合并仲裁的具体适用、更换仲裁员情况下的选定期限、首席仲裁员经授权单独决定程序安排的权力、视情况聘请速录人员记录笔录；提高简易程序的争议金额等等；4、根据国际仲裁实践，顺应最新发展趋势，规定多份合同仲裁、追加当事人和紧急仲裁员程序等。

下面从仲裁案件当事人和代理律师的角度具体讨论几个问题。

一、关于“仲裁院”新规则中的“仲裁院”取代了2012版规则中的“秘书局”，但贸仲“仲裁院”并不等同于国际商会（ICC）下设的仲裁院（International Court of Arbitration），而是相当于其秘书处（Secretariat of the Court）。

对于当事人来说，这一点只是内部机构设置的调整，贸仲自身名称没有变化，起草仲裁协议时无须因此对仲裁机构的名称进行任何调整。

二、关于“香港仲裁的特别规定”贸仲2012年设立香港仲裁中心，为选择香港作为仲裁地的当事人提供了新的选择。

毫无疑问，对于那些因与合同对方就争议解决条款争执不下最后被迫让步选择香港作为仲裁地，同时又希望在相对熟悉和了解的环境和模式下进行仲裁程序的内地当事人来讲，选择贸仲香港仲裁中心是再合适不过了。

中国国际贸易促进委员会对外贸易仲裁委员会仲裁程序暂行规则文章属性•【制定机关】中国国际贸易促进委员会•【公布日期】1956.03.31•【文号】•【施行日期】1956.03.31•【效力等级】行业规定•【时效性】已被修改•【主题分类】仲裁正文*注：本篇法规已被修订，新法规名称为《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》（发布日期：1988年9月12日实施日期：1989年1月1日）中国国际贸易促进委员会对外贸易仲裁委员会仲裁程序暂行规则（一九五六年三月三十一日中国国际贸易促进委员会第四次委员会议通过）第一条本规则根据前政务院一九五四年五月六日第二百一十五次政务会议通过的关于在中国国际贸易促进委员会内设立对外贸易仲裁委员会的决定第十二条的规定制定。

第二条对外贸易仲裁委员会（以下简称仲裁委员会）受理对外贸易契约和交易中所发生的争议，特别是外国商号、公司或者其他经济组织同中国商号、公司或者其他经济组织间的争议，但是也可以受理外国商号、公司或者其他经济组织间，以及中国商号、公司或者其他经济组织间有关对外贸易契约和交易中所发生的争议。

前项争议包括一切由于在国外购买、销售商品契约或者委托买卖契约所发生的，由于有关商品的运输、保险、保管、发送所发生的，和其他对外贸易业务上所发生的争议。

第三条仲裁委员会对于前条争议根据双方当事人订定提请仲裁委员会解决的书面协议，并依一方当事人的书面申请予以受理。

前项协议指在原贸易合同或者贸易协议内规定的仲裁条款或者以其他形式（例如特别协议、往来函件、其他有关文件内的特别约定）规定的仲裁协议。

第四条仲裁申请书应当叙明下列各项：一、申诉人和被诉人的名称和地址；二、申诉人的要求和所根据的事实和证据；三、就仲裁委员会委员中选定仲裁员一人的姓名，或者委托仲裁委员会主席代为指定的声明。

第五条仲裁申请书应当附具同申请有关的证件（契约、仲裁协议、当事人往来函件等）原本或者经过证明的副本或者抄本。

第六条申诉人在提出仲裁申请书的时候，应当缴纳为补偿仲裁费用的手续费的预付金，金额是争议金额的百分之零点五。

《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》随着全球经济的不断发展，国际贸易的规模和范围不断扩大。

然而，国际贸易中难免会出现纠纷，这些纠纷可能涉及到不同国家、不同文化背景和不同法律制度。

为了解决这些纠纷，国际仲裁成为了一种重要的解决方式。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会（以下简称“CIETAC”）是中国最具代表性的仲裁机构之一，其仲裁规则是国际商事仲裁中的重要法规之一。

一、CIETAC的概述CIETAC是中国政府主管的国际商事仲裁机构，成立于1956年。

其总部位于北京，设有分支机构和代表处。

CIETAC的仲裁规则被广泛应用于国际商事仲裁中，特别是在与中国有关的商事纠纷中。

CIETAC的仲裁裁决得到国际认可，其仲裁机构的专业性、高效性和公正性备受赞誉。

CIETAC的仲裁规则不仅适用于中国国内的仲裁案件，也适用于国际仲裁案件。

二、CIETAC的仲裁规则CIETAC的仲裁规则是指CIETAC用于处理纠纷的一套规则，包括仲裁程序、仲裁庭的组成和程序、证据的提交和审查、裁决的形式和效力等方面的规定。

CIETAC的仲裁规则是一份完整的文书，是CIETAC 仲裁程序中的基本法律文件。

1. 适用范围CIETAC的仲裁规则适用于国际商事仲裁案件和国内商事仲裁案件。

国际商事仲裁案件是指仲裁当事人或仲裁事项涉及两个或两个以上国家或地区的商事活动。

国内商事仲裁案件是指仲裁当事人或仲裁事项均在中国境内的商事活动。

2. 仲裁程序CIETAC的仲裁程序分为四个阶段：仲裁申请、仲裁答辩、听证和裁决。

仲裁申请是仲裁当事人向CIETAC提交仲裁申请书的过程。

仲裁答辩是被申请人向CIETAC提交答辩书的过程。

听证是仲裁庭组成后，召开听证会进行证据交换和辩论的过程。

裁决是仲裁庭根据听证会的结果，最终作出的仲裁裁决。

3. 仲裁庭的组成和程序CIETAC的仲裁庭由仲裁员组成，仲裁员可以由当事人共同提名，也可以由CIETAC指定。

仲裁庭的程序包括仲裁庭组成、仲裁庭的职权和义务、仲裁庭的裁决程序等方面的规定。

第一条中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会（原名中国国际贸易促进委员会对外贸易仲裁委员会，后名中国国际贸易促进委员会对外经济贸易仲裁委员会，现名中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会，以下简称仲裁委员会）是中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会依法组织设立的处理契约性或非契约性的经济贸易等争议的仲裁机构。

仲裁委员会同时使用“中国国际商会仲裁院”名称。

第二条仲裁委员会的主要业务是：（一）受理平等主体的公民、法人和其他组织之间的国际/涉外仲裁案件及国内仲裁案件，包括香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区或台湾地区的仲裁案件；（二）受理由政府或其它国内外组织授权仲裁委员会处理的争议案件；（三）提供当事人约定由仲裁委员会处理的其它争议解决服务；（四）根据当事人的约定和请求，为在境外进行的非机构仲裁指定仲裁员；（五）宣传推广和研究仲裁及其它非诉讼解决争议的方式方法；（六）开展国内外业务交流，参加相关的国内外组织。

第三条仲裁委员会由主任一人、副主任若干人及委员若干人组成。

仲裁委员会设秘书长一人及副秘书长若干人。

主任、副主任和委员由中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会聘请有关方面的专家和知名人士担任，每届任期三年；如有必要，任期可做适当调整。

秘书长和副秘书长由仲裁委员会主任聘任。

秘书长和副秘书长人选的年龄不应超过五十五岁。

第四条仲裁委员会设名誉主任一人、名誉副主任一至三名及顾问若干人，由中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会邀请有关知名人士担任。

第五条仲裁委员会委员会议每年召开一次；如有需要，可以召开临时会议。

仲裁委员会委员会议，由仲裁委员会主任或主任授权的副主任主持召开。

每次会议须有半数以上委员包括主任及/或副主任出席，方能举行。

会议的决议须经出席会议的半数以上的委员包括主任及/或副主任通过，方为有效。

第六条仲裁委员会委员会议的主要任务是：（一）讨论有关仲裁委员会工作的方针、原则等重要事项并作出相应的决议；（二）制定和修改仲裁委员会的章程；（三）审议、通过关于制定和修改仲裁委员会仲裁规则的草案，报中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会核准公布；（四）审议、通过仲裁委员会主任提出的年度工作报告。

关于中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会裁决书的法律意见书（二）国律函2012-046号广东三茂铁路实业发展有限公司：针对珠海经济特区香洲金都房产开发有限公司（下称“金都公司”）和佳建亚洲有限公司（下称“佳建公司”）、广东三茂铁路实业发展有限公司（下称“三茂公司”）合作经营合同争议仲裁案的裁决书，补充意见如下：一、裁决结果的利弊分析仲裁委对于金都公司的仲裁请求部分支持，部分驳回。

应当全面对裁决结果分析，以便确定下步工作。

仲裁裁决对三茂公司有利方面表现在以下几点：1.三茂公司在本案中无需承担任何赔偿责任。

其他两股东不可能再以其他方式要求三茂公司承担责任。

2.佳建公司独自承担分割土地的巨额赔偿责任，佳建公司可能因此出局，有利于解决合作项目僵局。

在仲裁审理阶段，三茂公司与金都公司进行了长达一年的和解协商，但均因金都公司无法与佳建公司达成一致，和解未成。

由于金都公司与佳建公司关系彻底破裂，只有其中一家出局，僵局才能打破，否则该项目无法盘活。

3.合作合同解除，合作企业进入清算程序，有利于推动各方股东解决矛盾，避免久拖不决。

4.合作企业有两项巨额的财产来源，在佳建公司需承担赔偿责任的情况下，三茂公司作为最大投资股东，可能获得金额不菲的清算财产。

仲裁裁决对三茂公司不利方面表现在土地使用权的置换权益由金都公司获得，该置换权益的价值高过金都公司应退还的8793万元。

另外，由法院主持的强制清算程序启动后，会造成清算费用加大，现股东对清算程序没有控制权等。

综合以上分析，本律师认为本案裁决结果对三茂公司利大于弊，即使通过法院撤销仲裁裁决，得以免除赔偿责任的佳建公司是最大得益方，可能又会阻碍合作项目盘活，合作企业重回僵局，三茂公司退出遥遥无期。

况且本案的裁决程序不存在违法情形，法院撤销仲裁裁决的可能性极微。

因此，对该裁决应客观分析，不能全面否定，应从三茂公司的根本利益出发，选择最有利的应对措施。

二、对目前工作的建议由于裁决书已生效，在裁决书没有被撤销之前，建议按裁决书的要求开展相关的工作。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则根据《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》第二条的规定，贸仲委受案范围是：(一)国际的或涉外的争议;(二)涉及香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区或台湾地区的争议;(三)外商投资企业相互之间以及外商投资企业与中国其他法人、自然人及/或经济组织之间的争议;(四)涉及中国法人、自然人及/或其他经济组织利用外国的、国际组织的或香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区、台湾地区的资金、技术或服务进行项目融资、招标投标、工程建筑等活动的争议;(五)中华人民共和国法律、行政法规特别规定或特别授权由仲裁委员会受理的争议;(六)当事人协议由仲裁委员会仲裁的其它国内争议。

上述仲裁规则将原来只受理涉外经贸争议调整为国内外经贸争议，扩大了贸仲在国内的服务领域，得到了国内企业界的广泛欢迎。

根据《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会金融争议仲裁规则》第二条的规定，贸仲委受理金融争议的范围是：当事人之间因金融交易发生的或与此有关的争议均可以提交贸仲委仲裁。

规则所指金融交易，是指金融机构之间以及金融机构与其他法人和自然人之间在货币市场、资本市场、外汇市场、黄金市场和保险市场上所发生的本外币资金融通、本外币各项金融工具和单据的转让、买卖等金融交易,包括但不限于下列交易:1、贷款；2、存单；3、担保；4、信用证；5、票据；6、基金交易和基金托管；7、债券；8、托收和外汇汇款；9、保理；10、银行间的偿付约定。

域名争议解决中心，经中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC)的授权，解决中文域名争议、通用网址争议、.CN域名争议。

此外，域名争议解决中心还作为国际通用顶级域名(gTLDs)管理机构美国互联网络名称和数码分配公司( ICANN)授权的国际通用顶级域名争议解决机构—亚洲域名争议解决中心之北京秘书处，负责解决国际通用顶级域名争议。

贸仲委实行仲裁员名册制度，当事人应在《仲裁员名册》中指定仲裁员。

仲裁员均是从法律、经济贸易、科学技术等方面具有专门知识和实际经验的中外人士中聘任的。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会上海分会仲裁规则（中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会上海分会第二届委员会第一次会议修订并通过，自2012年5月1日起施行）第一章总则第一条规则的制定根据《中华人民共和国仲裁法》和有关法律的规定制定本规则。

第二条名称和组织（一）中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会上海分会（以下简称本会）系解决平等主体的自然人、法人、其他经济组织之间发生的合同争议和其他财产权益争议的仲裁机构。

（二）当事人在仲裁协议中订明由中国国际贸易促进委员会上海市分会/上海国际商会仲裁，或由中国国际贸易促进委员会上海市分会/上海国际商会的仲裁委员会或仲裁院仲裁的，或由上海国际经济贸易仲裁委员会/上海涉外经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁的，均应视为同意由本会仲裁。

（三）本会主任履行本规则赋予的职责，副主任受主任的委托履行主任的职责。

（四）本会设秘书处，在本会秘书长的领导下负责处理本会的日常事务，履行本规则赋予的职责。

（五）本会设在中国上海。

（六）本会设立仲裁员名册。

第三条管辖范围本会受理下列争议案件：（一）国际的或涉外的争议案件；（二）涉及香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区或台湾地区的争议案件；（三）国内争议案件。

第四条规则的适用（一）凡当事人协议将争议提交本会仲裁的，适用本规则进行仲裁。

（二）当事人约定将争议提交本会仲裁但适用其他仲裁规则，或约定对本规则有关内容进行变更的，从其约定，但其约定无法实施或与仲裁地强制性法律规定相抵触者除外。

（三）凡当事人约定按照本规则进行仲裁但未约定仲裁机构的，均视为同意将争议提交本会仲裁。

第五条仲裁协议（一）本会根据当事人在争议发生之前或者在争议发生之后达成的将争议提交本会仲裁的仲裁协议和一方当事人的书面申请，受理案件。

（二）仲裁协议系指当事人在合同中订明的仲裁条款，或者以其他方式达成的提交仲裁的书面协议。

（三）仲裁协议应当采取书面形式。

书面形式包括合同书、信件、电报、电传、传真、电子数据交换和电子邮件等可以有形地表现所载内容的形式。

仲裁法司法考试真题(2011——2014)2011年49.甲不履行仲裁裁决，乙向法院申请执行。

甲拟提出不予执行的申请并提出下列证据证明仲裁裁决应不予执行。

针对下列哪一选项，法院可裁定驳回甲的申请？A.甲、乙没有订立仲裁条款或达成仲裁协议B.仲裁庭组成违反法定程序C.裁决事项超出仲裁机构权限范围D.仲裁裁决没有根据经当事人质证的证据认定事实50.根据《仲裁法》，仲裁庭作出的裁决书生效后，在下列哪一情形下仲裁庭不可进行补正？A.裁决书认定的事实错误B.裁决书中的文字错误C.裁决书中的计算错误D.裁决书遗漏了仲裁评议中记录的仲裁庭已经裁决的事项72.中国海天公司与某国小宇公司准备成立一家中外合资经营企业，并签署了合资合同与章程，但海天公司迟迟未向主管机关报批。

数月后，小宇公司因报批无望准备退出，但其为此次投资事宜已经花费70万元。

根据中外合资经营企业法律的相关规定，下列哪些表述是正确的？A.如最终未能获得审批机关的批准，则双方之间的合资合同为无效合同B.拟成立的合资企业的组织形式可以是有限责任公司或有限合伙企业C.小宇公司有权通过仲裁或者诉讼，请求海天公司按照合同约定履行报批义务D.小宇公司可以请求海天公司赔偿其70万元的损失邓某系K制药公司技术主管。

2008年2月，邓某私自接受Y制药公司聘请担任其技术顾问。

5月，K公司得知后质问邓某。

邓某表示自愿退出K公司，并承诺5年内不以任何直接或间接方式在任何一家制药公司任职或提供服务，否则将向K公司支付50万元违约金。

2009年，K公司发现邓某已担任Y公司的副总经理，并持有Y公司20%股份，而且Y公司新产品已采用K公司研发的配方。

K 公司以Y公司和邓某为被告提起侵犯商业秘密的诉讼。

请回答第95—96题。

95.关于Y公司和邓某的行为，下列说法正确的是：A.Y公司的行为构成侵犯他人商业秘密B.邓某的行为构成侵犯他人商业秘密C.Y公司的行为构成违反竞业禁止义务D.邓某的行为构成违反竞业禁止义务96.案件审理期间邓某提出，本案纠纷起因于自己与K公司的劳动关系，应属劳动争议案件，故K公司应向劳动争议仲裁机构提起仲裁申请，遂请求法院裁定驳回起诉。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则正文：---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则（１９８８年９月１２日中国国际贸易促进委员会第一届第三次委员会会议通过）第一章总则第一节管辖第一条中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会（以下简称仲裁委员会）以仲裁的方式，独立、公正地解决产生于国际经济贸易中的争议，以保护当事人的正当权益，促进国际经济贸易的发展。

第二条仲裁委员会根据当事人在争议发生之前或者在争议发生之后达成的将争议提交仲裁委员会仲裁的仲裁协议和一方当事人的书面申请，受理产生于国际经济贸易中的争议案件。

仲裁协议系指当事人在合同中订立的仲裁条款，或者以其他方式达成的提交仲裁的书面协议。

仲裁委员会有权就仲裁协议的有效性和仲裁案件的管辖权作出决定。

第二节组织第三条仲裁委员会由主席一人、副主席若干人和委员若干人组成。

主席履行本仲裁规则赋予的职责，副主席受主席委托可以履行主席的职责。

仲裁委员会设秘书处，负责处理仲裁委员会的日常事务。

第四条仲裁委员会设立仲裁员名册，仲裁员由中国国际贸易促进委员会从对国际经济贸易、科学技术和法律等方面具有专门知识和实际经验的中外人士中聘任。

第五条仲裁委员会设在北京。

根据仲裁业务发展的需要，仲裁委员会可以在中国境内其他地方设立仲裁委员会分会。

第二章仲裁程序第一节仲裁申请、答辩和反诉第六条申诉人必须按照下列要求向仲裁委员会提出仲裁申请：（一）向仲裁委员会提交仲裁申请书。

仲裁申请书应当写明：１、申诉人和被诉人的名称、地址；２、申诉人所依据的仲裁协议；３、申诉人的要求及所依据的事实和证据。

仲裁申请书应当由申诉人及／或申诉人授权的代理人签名。

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration CommissionCIETACArbitration Rules(Revised and adopted by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce on February 3, 2012. Effective as of May 1, 2012.)Chapter I General ProvisionsArticle 1 The Arbitration Commission1. The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CIETAC”), originally named the Foreign Trade Arbitration Commission of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade and later renamed the Foreign Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, concurrently uses as its name the “Court of Arb itration of the China Chamber of International Commerce”.2. Where an arbitration agreement provides for arbitration by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce, or by the Arbitration Commission or the Court of Arbitration of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce, or refers to CIETAC’s previous names, it shall be deemed that the parties have agreed to arbitration by CIETAC.Article 2 The Structure and Duties1. The Chairman of CIETAC shall perform the functions and duties vested in him/her by these Rules while a Vice Chairman may perform the Chairman’s functions and duties with the Chairman’s authorization.2. CIETAC has a Secretariat, which handles its day-to-day work and performs the functions in accordance with these Rules under the direction of the Secretary General.3. CIETAC is based in Beijing. It has sub-commissions or centers in Shenzhen, Shanghai, Tianjin and Chongqing. The sub-commissions/centers areCIETAC’s branches, which accept arbitration applications and administer arbitration cases with CIETAC’s authorization.4. A sub-commission/center has a secretariat, which handles the day-to-day work of the sub-commission/center and performs the functions of the Secretariat of CIETAC in accordance with these Rules under the direction of the secretary general of the sub-commission/center.5. Where a case is administered by a sub-commission/center, the functions and duties vested in the Secretary General of CIETAC under these Rules may, by his/her authorization, be performed by the secretary general of the relevant sub-commission/center.6. The parties may agree to submit their disputes to CIETAC or a sub-commission/center of CIETAC for arbitration. Where the parties have agreed to arbitration by CIETAC, the Secretariat of CIETAC shall accept the arbitration application and administer the case. Where the parties have agreed to arbitration by a sub-commission/center, the secretariat of the sub-commission/center agreed upon by the parties shall accept the arbitration application and administer the case. Where the sub-commission/center agreed upon by the parties does not exist, or where the agreement is ambiguous, the Secretariat of CIETAC shall accept the arbitration application and administer the case. In the event of any dispute, a decision shall be made by CIETAC.7. CIETAC sets up liaison offices in cities and industries where appropriate. The liaison offices are branches of CIETAC, and may perform the relevant functions in accordance with the written authorization of CIETAC.Article 3 Jurisdiction1. CIETAC accepts cases involving economic, trade and other disputes of a contractual or non-contractual nature, based on an agreement of the parties.2. The cases referred to in the preceding paragraph include:(a) international or foreign-related disputes;(b) disputes related to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region and the Taiwan region; and(c) domestic disputes.Article 4 Scope of Application1. These Rules uniformly apply to CIETAC and its sub-commissions/centers.2. The parties shall be deemed to have agreed to arbitration in accordance with these Rules if they have agreed to arbitration by CIETAC.3. Where the parties agree to refer their dispute to CIETAC for arbitration but have agreed on a modification of these Rules or have agreed on the application of other arbitration rules, the parties’ agreement shall prevail unless such agreement is inoperative or in conflict with a mandatory provision of the law as it applies to the arbitration proceedings. Where the parties have agreed on the application of other arbitration rules, CIETAC shall perform the relevant administrative duties.4. Where the parties agree to refer their dispute to arbitration under these Rules without providing the name of the arbitration institution, they shall be deemed to have agreed to refer the dispute to arbitration by CIETAC.5. Where the parties agree to ref er their disputes to arbitration under CIETAC’s customized arbitration rules for a specific trade or profession, the parties’ agreement shall prevail. However, if the dispute falls outside the scope of the specific rules, these Rules shall apply.Article 5 Arbitration Agreement1. An arbitration agreement means an arbitration clause in a contract or any other form of a written agreement concluded between the parties providing for the settlement of disputes by arbitration.2. The arbitration agreement shall be in writing. An arbitration agreement is in writing if it is contained in the tangible form of a document such as a contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, EDI, or email. An arbitration agreement shall be deemed to exist where its existence is asserted by one party and not denied by the other during the exchange of the Request for Arbitration and the Statement of Defense.3. Where the law as it applies to an arbitration agreement has different provisions as to the form and validity of the arbitration agreement, those provisions shall prevail.4. An arbitration clause contained in a contract shall be treated as a clause independent and separate from all other clauses of the contract, and an arbitration agreement attached to a contract shall also be treated as independent and separate from all other clauses of the contract. The validity of an arbitration clause or an arbitration agreement shall not be affected by any modification, cancellation, termination, transfer, expiry, invalidity, ineffectiveness, rescission or non-existence of the contract.Article 6 Objection to Arbitration Agreement and/or Jurisdiction1. CIETAC shall have the power to determine the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and its jurisdiction over an arbitration case. CIETAC may, where necessary, delegate such power to the arbitral tribunal.2. Where CIETAC is satisfied by prima facie evidence that an arbitration agreement providing for arbitration by CIETAC exists, it may make a decision based on such evidence that it has jurisdiction over the arbitration case, and the arbitration shall proceed. Such a decision shall not prevent CIETAC from making a new decision on jurisdiction based on facts and/or evidence found by the arbitral tribunal during the arbitration proceedings that are inconsistent with the prima facie evidence.3. Where CIETAC has delegated the power to determine jurisdiction to the arbitral tribunal, the arbitral tribunal may either make a separate decision on jurisdiction during the arbitration proceedings or incorporate the decision in the final arbitral award.4. An objection to an arbitration agreement and/or jurisdiction over an arbitration case shall be raised in writing before the first oral hearing is held by the arbitral tribunal. Where a case is to be decided on the basis of documents only, such an objection shall be raised before the submission of the first substantive defense.5. The arbitration shall proceed notwithstanding an objection to the arbitration agreement and/or jurisdiction over the arbitration case.6. The aforesaid objections to and/or decisions on jurisdiction by CIETAC shall include objections to and/or decisions on a party’s standing to participate in the arbitration.7. Where CIETAC or the authorized arbitral tribunal decides that CIETAC has no jurisdiction over an arbitration case, a decision to dismiss the case shall be made. Where a case is to be dismissed before the formation of the arbitral tribunal, the decision shall be made by the Secretary General of CIETAC. Where the case is to be dismissed after the formation of the arbitral tribunal, the decision shall be made by the arbitral tribunal.Article 7 Place of Arbitration1. Where the parties have agreed on the place of arbitration, the parties’ agreement shall prevail.2. Where the parties have not agreed on the place of arbitration or their agreement is ambiguous, the place of arbitration shall be the domicile of CIETAC or its sub-commission/center administering the case. CIETAC may also determine the place of arbitration to be another location having regard to the circumstances of the case.3. The arbitral award shall be deemed as having been made at the place of arbitration.Article 8 Service of Documents and Periods of Time1. All documents, notices and written materials in relation to the arbitration may be delivered in person or sent by registered mail or express mail, fax, or by any other means considered proper by the Secretariat of CIETAC or the arbitral tribunal.2. The arbitration documents referred to in the preceding Paragraph 1 shall be sent to the address provided by the party itself or by its representative(s), or to an address agreed by the parties. Where a party or its representative(s) has not provided an address or the parties have not agreed on an address, the arbitration documents shall be sent to such party’s address as provided by the other party or its representative(s).3. Any arbitration correspondence to a party or its representative(s) shall be deemed to have been properly served on the party if delivered to the addressee or sent to the addressee’s place of business, registration, domicile, habitual residence or mailing address, or where, after reasonable inquiries by the other party, none of the aforesaid addresses can be found, the arbitration。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则（2012年修订）目录第一章总则第二章仲裁程序第一节仲裁申请、答辩、反请求第二节仲裁员及仲裁庭第三节审理第三章裁决第四章简易程序第五章国内仲裁的特别规定第六章附则第一章总则第一条仲裁委员会(一)中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会(以下简称“仲裁委员会”)，原名中国国际贸易促进委员会对外贸易仲裁委员会、中国国际贸易促进委员会对外经济贸易仲裁委员会，同时使用“中国国际商会仲裁院”名称。

(二)当事人在仲裁协议中订明由中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会仲裁，或由中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会的仲裁委员会或仲裁院仲裁的，或使用仲裁委员会原名称为仲裁机构的，均应视为同意由中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁。

第二条机构及职责(一)仲裁委员会主任履行本规则赋予的职责。

副主任根据主任的授权可以履行主任的职责。

(二)仲裁委员会设秘书局，在秘书长的领导下负责处理仲裁委员会的日常事务并履行本规则规定的职责。

(三)仲裁委员会设在北京。

仲裁委员会在深圳、上海、天津和重庆设有分会或中心。

仲裁委员会的分会/中心是仲裁委员会的派出机构，根据仲裁委员会的授权接受仲裁申请并管理仲裁案件。

(四)仲裁委员会分会/中心设秘书处，在仲裁委员会分会/中心秘书长的领导下，负责处理分会/中心的日常事务并履行本规则规定由仲裁委员会秘书局履行的职责。

(五)案件由分会/中心管理的，本规则规定由仲裁委员会秘书长履行的职责，由仲裁委员会秘书长授权的分会/中心秘书长履行。

(六)当事人可以约定将争议提交仲裁委员会或仲裁委员会分会/中心进行仲裁；约定由仲裁委员会进行仲裁的，由仲裁委员会秘书局接受仲裁申请并管理案件；约定由分会/中心仲裁的，由所约定的分会/中心秘书处接受仲裁申请并管理案件；约定的分会/中心不存在或约定不明的，由仲裁委员会秘书局接受仲裁申请并管理案件。

如有争议，由仲裁委员会作出决定。

(七)仲裁委员会在具备条件的城市和行业设立办事处。

中国国际贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则改革开放以来，随着中国国际贸易规模的不断扩大，国际贸易争端日益频繁。

为此，中外贸易双方逐渐倾向于采用仲裁方式解决争端，以保持贸易关系的稳定和发展。

有关仲裁的法律规定已经列入《中华人民共和国国际贸易仲裁法》（以下简称《仲裁法》），《仲裁法》第九条规定，中国国际贸易仲裁委员会（以下简称中仲会）由国务院设立。

中仲会是中国专业的、具有法律地位的国际贸易仲裁机构。

它在中外贸易争端中承担起维护和保护两国人民合法权益的重要职责，是中国国际贸易秩序稳定的重要基础。

中仲会受国务院领导，运用国际贸易仲裁的国际规则和我国有关法律法规，调处和解决中外贸易争端，实行独立，公正和有效的仲裁活动，保证中外贸易关系的稳定发展。

既然中仲会肩负着如此重要的职责，且它的工作也受到全国人民的充分关注，以及相关仲裁机构的及时关注。

为此，中仲会制定了《中国国际贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则（以下简称《规则》）》，以指导其在仲裁活动中的操作行为，并确保仲裁工作的准确和有效执行。

一、规则的作用规则的主要作用是指导中仲会的仲裁活动，维护中仲会的权威和独立性，保证仲裁行政的准确，有序和有效。

它赋予中仲会实行独立，公正，有效的仲裁活动的权力，符合中国国际贸易仲裁法的规定，遵守中外贸易规则的规定，并依据国际惯例和有关国际贸易法律法规确定和实施中外贸易仲裁活动。

二、规则的内容《规则》主要包括以下内容：1、仲裁程序：该规则针对以合同争端、违约责任、知识产权、投资纠纷等主要仲裁事项，结合实际情况，规定了中国国际贸易仲裁委员会仲裁活动的具体程序，包括申请仲裁、组建仲裁庭、审理仲裁、裁决书执行等程序。

2、仲裁费用：本规则已经明确规定的仲裁费用，并在此表示，中仲会将根据中外贸易双方洽谈并签订的仲裁协议，根据有关规定交纳仲裁费用。

3、仲裁结果：中仲会将在仲裁结束后，根据仲裁程序规定，及时公布仲裁结果，以确保申请人的合法权益。

三、规则的实施中仲会将根据《中国国际贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》的具体规定，制定完善相关操作规范。

《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》一、前言随着全球化的发展，国际贸易和投资的规模不断扩大，各国间的经济联系日益紧密。

然而，在跨国经济交往中，由于涉及的国家、地区、文化、法律等因素不同，往往会涌现出一些纠纷。

针对此类纠纷，常常需要采取仲裁等非诉讼方式来解决。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会（下称“CIETAC”）作为中国知名的、非政府性质的国际商事仲裁机构，具有公正、独立、高效等优势，其仲裁规则也日益广受赞誉。

二、CIETAC简介CIETAC成立于1956年，是中国唯一的由司法部授权、独立运作的对外经济贸易仲裁机构，总部设在北京。

CIETAC每年受理的仲裁案件超过2000件，涉及面广泛，包括商业合同、出口合同、技术合同、股权纠纷、投资争议等等。

CIETAC在国内外的仲裁裁决都具有法律效力。

三、CIETAC仲裁规则为有效维护仲裁的公正性和效力，CIETAC制定了《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》（下称“规则”），并不断根据实践经验进行修改和完善。

该规则包含了仲裁债权、章程、仲裁程序、临时仲裁以及监督程序等内容，旨在确保仲裁的公正、公正和效力。

（一）仲裁程序CIETAC规则明确了仲裁程序的重要环节，包括仲裁通知、仲裁答辩，仲裁程序和仲裁裁决等。

仲裁通知以及答辩是仲裁程序的重要开端，要求仲裁当事人通知对方仲裁事项，并提供相关证据等。

仲裁程序包括了仲裁庭组成、仲裁庭听证、口头审理等，以确保对当事人的权益保护。

仲裁裁决则是仲裁程序的最终结果，规定仲裁委员会需要签发仲裁裁决书，并按照仲裁裁决的内容执行最终判决。

（二）远程仲裁当事人因地域、时间等原因无法到达仲裁机构进行仲裁时，CIETAC完善了远程仲裁制度。

即采取视频、邮件等方式进行仲裁，实现了更加高效、便捷的仲裁方式。

（三）保全措施在仲裁过程中，为了保护当事人的财产权益，规定了一些保全措施。

例如，可以向法院申请冻结被告的银行账户、股票账户等措施，确保最终判决能够得到执行。

对国际商事仲裁中的临时措施2008年以来，禁令（injunction）逐渐成为与仲裁相关的热门议题。

在国际民商事纠纷中，大量平行程序的出现严重干扰了仲裁的进行。

仲裁作为一种民间性的争议解决方式，具有高度自治性，当事人完全由其意思支配达成仲裁协议，如果一项有效仲裁协议受到禁止或违背，显然是违背正义的举动。

而国际商事仲裁经常遭遇一国法院签发的禁诉令，甚至直接针对仲裁员。

也时常面临仲裁协议一方当事人违背仲裁协议去外国法院起诉的状况。

仲裁的民间性集中了私人自治的理念，私人的这种权利应该得到司法的支持和保护，因此应该赋予仲裁庭更多的权力去维护当事人的利益和仲裁的权威。

在国际商事仲裁中，仲裁协议依然是仲裁庭权力的主要来源。

若当事人在协议中约定，争议发生后一方违背协议去法院起诉，仲裁庭可根据协议的约定向其发出禁诉令。

意味着当事人合意授权仲裁庭此项权利，仲裁庭可在必要时向一方当事人作出禁诉令。

仲裁庭直接享有作出禁诉令的权力可能比向仲裁地法院申请禁诉令要快捷方便，各国仲裁法直接规定仲裁庭享有发布禁诉令的现象并不多见，但从相关国际立法和国内立法的变化来看，赋予仲裁庭更多作出临时措施的权利将成为趋势。

二、发布禁诉令的主体和对象（一）法院作出的禁诉令1、针对外国诉讼的禁诉令禁诉令是禁令的一种，一般是指在国际平行诉讼中，一国法院对系属该国法院管辖的当事人发出的，阻止他在外国法院提起或者继续进行已提起的、与在该国法院未决的诉讼相同或者相似的诉讼的限制性命令。

还有一种情况是为了保护国内仲裁，一方当事人通过仲裁庭向仲裁地法院申请向外国起诉一方发出禁诉令。

比较典型和常见的就是英国法院的禁诉令，因为大量国际租船合约都约定了伦敦仲裁，而经常在判断先后起诉是否是同一诉因上，英国法与其他国家的法律会出现冲突，这时英国法院往往会向外国一方当事人签发禁诉令。

2、针对外国仲裁的禁诉令仲裁是ADR的一种，因其高效性、自治性和仲裁员的专业性越来越受到商人的青睐和尊重。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则(2012年修订) 文章属性•【制定机关】中国国际贸易促进委员会,中国国际商会•【公布日期】2012.02.03•【文号】•【施行日期】2012.05.01•【效力等级】行业规定•【时效性】现行有效•【主题分类】仲裁正文中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则（中国国际贸易促进委员会、中国国际商会2012年2月3日修订并通过，2012年5月1日起施行）第一章总则第一条仲裁委员会（一）中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会（以下简称“仲裁委员会”），原名中国国际贸易促进委员会对外贸易仲裁委员会、中国国际贸易促进委员会对外经济贸易仲裁委员会，同时使用“中国国际商会仲裁院”名称。

（二）当事人在仲裁协议中订明由中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会仲裁，或由中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会的仲裁委员会或仲裁院仲裁的，或使用仲裁委员会原名称为仲裁机构的，均应视为同意由中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁。

第二条机构及职责（一）仲裁委员会主任履行本规则赋予的职责。

副主任根据主任的授权可以履行主任的职责。

（二）仲裁委员会设秘书局，在秘书长的领导下负责处理仲裁委员会的日常事务并履行本规则规定的职责。

（三）仲裁委员会设在北京。

仲裁委员会在深圳、上海、天津和重庆设有分会或中心。

仲裁委员会的分会/中心是仲裁委员会的派出机构，根据仲裁委员会的授权接受仲裁申请并管理仲裁案件。

（四）仲裁委员会分会/中心设秘书处，在仲裁委员会分会/中心秘书长的领导下，负责处理分会/中心的日常事务并履行本规则规定由仲裁委员会秘书局履行的职责。

（五）案件由分会/中心管理的，本规则规定由仲裁委员会秘书长履行的职责，由仲裁委员会秘书长授权的分会/中心秘书长履行。

（六）当事人可以约定将争议提交仲裁委员会或仲裁委员会分会/中心进行仲裁；约定由仲裁委员会进行仲裁的，由仲裁委员会秘书局接受仲裁申请并管理案件；约定由分会/中心仲裁的，由所约定的分会/中心秘书处接受仲裁申请并管理案件；约定的分会/中心不存在或约定不明的，由仲裁委员会秘书局接受仲裁申请并管理案件。

China International Economic and Trade Arbitration CommissionCIETACArbitration Rules(Revised and adopted by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce on February 3, 2012. Effective as of May 1, 2012.)Chapter I General ProvisionsArticle 1 The Arbitration Commission1. The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CIETAC”), originally named the Foreign Trade Arbitration Commission of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade and later renamed the Foreign Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, concurrently uses as its name the “Court of Arb itration of the China Chamber of International Commerce”.2. Where an arbitration agreement provides for arbitration by the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce, or by the Arbitration Commission or the Court of Arbitration of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade/China Chamber of International Commerce, or refers to CIETAC’s previous names, it shall be deemed that the parties have agreed to arbitration by CIETAC.Article 2 The Structure and Duties1. The Chairman of CIETAC shall perform the functions and duties vested in him/her by these Rules while a Vice Chairman may perform the Chairman’s functions and duties with the Chairman’s authorization.2. CIETAC has a Secretariat, which handles its day-to-day work and performs the functions in accordance with these Rules under the direction of the Secretary General.3. CIETAC is based in Beijing. It has sub-commissions or centers in Shenzhen, Shanghai, Tianjin and Chongqing. The sub-commissions/centers areCIETAC’s branches, which accept arbitration applications and administer arbitration cases with CIETAC’s authorization.4. A sub-commission/center has a secretariat, which handles the day-to-day work of the sub-commission/center and performs the functions of the Secretariat of CIETAC in accordance with these Rules under the direction of the secretary general of the sub-commission/center.5. Where a case is administered by a sub-commission/center, the functions and duties vested in the Secretary General of CIETAC under these Rules may, by his/her authorization, be performed by the secretary general of the relevant sub-commission/center.6. The parties may agree to submit their disputes to CIETAC or a sub-commission/center of CIETAC for arbitration. Where the parties have agreed to arbitration by CIETAC, the Secretariat of CIETAC shall accept the arbitration application and administer the case. Where the parties have agreed to arbitration by a sub-commission/center, the secretariat of the sub-commission/center agreed upon by the parties shall accept the arbitration application and administer the case. Where the sub-commission/center agreed upon by the parties does not exist, or where the agreement is ambiguous, the Secretariat of CIETAC shall accept the arbitration application and administer the case. In the event of any dispute, a decision shall be made by CIETAC.7. CIETAC sets up liaison offices in cities and industries where appropriate. The liaison offices are branches of CIETAC, and may perform the relevant functions in accordance with the written authorization of CIETAC.Article 3 Jurisdiction1. CIETAC accepts cases involving economic, trade and other disputes of a contractual or non-contractual nature, based on an agreement of the parties.2. The cases referred to in the preceding paragraph include:(a) international or foreign-related disputes;(b) disputes related to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region and the Taiwan region; and(c) domestic disputes.Article 4 Scope of Application1. These Rules uniformly apply to CIETAC and its sub-commissions/centers.2. The parties shall be deemed to have agreed to arbitration in accordance with these Rules if they have agreed to arbitration by CIETAC.3. Where the parties agree to refer their dispute to CIETAC for arbitration but have agreed on a modification of these Rules or have agreed on the application of other arbitration rules, the parties’ agreement shall prevail unless such agreement is inoperative or in conflict with a mandatory provision of the law as it applies to the arbitration proceedings. Where the parties have agreed on the application of other arbitration rules, CIETAC shall perform the relevant administrative duties.4. Where the parties agree to refer their dispute to arbitration under these Rules without providing the name of the arbitration institution, they shall be deemed to have agreed to refer the dispute to arbitration by CIETAC.5. Where the parties agree to ref er their disputes to arbitration under CIETAC’s customized arbitration rules for a specific trade or profession, the parties’ agreement shall prevail. However, if the dispute falls outside the scope of the specific rules, these Rules shall apply.Article 5 Arbitration Agreement1. An arbitration agreement means an arbitration clause in a contract or any other form of a written agreement concluded between the parties providing for the settlement of disputes by arbitration.2. The arbitration agreement shall be in writing. An arbitration agreement is in writing if it is contained in the tangible form of a document such as a contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, EDI, or email. An arbitration agreement shall be deemed to exist where its existence is asserted by one party and not denied by the other during the exchange of the Request for Arbitration and the Statement of Defense.3. Where the law as it applies to an arbitration agreement has different provisions as to the form and validity of the arbitration agreement, those provisions shall prevail.4. An arbitration clause contained in a contract shall be treated as a clause independent and separate from all other clauses of the contract, and an arbitration agreement attached to a contract shall also be treated as independent and separate from all other clauses of the contract. The validity of an arbitration clause or an arbitration agreement shall not be affected by any modification, cancellation, termination, transfer, expiry, invalidity, ineffectiveness, rescission or non-existence of the contract.Article 6 Objection to Arbitration Agreement and/or Jurisdiction1. CIETAC shall have the power to determine the existence and validity of an arbitration agreement and its jurisdiction over an arbitration case. CIETAC may, where necessary, delegate such power to the arbitral tribunal.2. Where CIETAC is satisfied by prima facie evidence that an arbitration agreement providing for arbitration by CIETAC exists, it may make a decision based on such evidence that it has jurisdiction over the arbitration case, and the arbitration shall proceed. Such a decision shall not prevent CIETAC from making a new decision on jurisdiction based on facts and/or evidence found by the arbitral tribunal during the arbitration proceedings that are inconsistent with the prima facie evidence.3. Where CIETAC has delegated the power to determine jurisdiction to the arbitral tribunal, the arbitral tribunal may either make a separate decision on jurisdiction during the arbitration proceedings or incorporate the decision in the final arbitral award.4. An objection to an arbitration agreement and/or jurisdiction over an arbitration case shall be raised in writing before the first oral hearing is held by the arbitral tribunal. Where a case is to be decided on the basis of documents only, such an objection shall be raised before the submission of the first substantive defense.5. The arbitration shall proceed notwithstanding an objection to the arbitration agreement and/or jurisdiction over the arbitration case.6. The aforesaid objections to and/or decisions on jurisdiction by CIETAC shall include objections to and/or decisions on a party’s standing to participate in the arbitration.7. Where CIETAC or the authorized arbitral tribunal decides that CIETAC has no jurisdiction over an arbitration case, a decision to dismiss the case shall be made. Where a case is to be dismissed before the formation of the arbitral tribunal, the decision shall be made by the Secretary General of CIETAC. Where the case is to be dismissed after the formation of the arbitral tribunal, the decision shall be made by the arbitral tribunal.Article 7 Place of Arbitration1. Where the parties have agreed on the place of arbitration, the parties’ agreement shall prevail.2. Where the parties have not agreed on the place of arbitration or their agreement is ambiguous, the place of arbitration shall be the domicile of CIETAC or its sub-commission/center administering the case. CIETAC may also determine the place of arbitration to be another location having regard to the circumstances of the case.3. The arbitral award shall be deemed as having been made at the place of arbitration.Article 8 Service of Documents and Periods of Time1. All documents, notices and written materials in relation to the arbitration may be delivered in person or sent by registered mail or express mail, fax, or by any other means considered proper by the Secretariat of CIETAC or the arbitral tribunal.2. The arbitration documents referred to in the preceding Paragraph 1 shall be sent to the address provided by the party itself or by its representative(s), or to an address agreed by the parties. Where a party or its representative(s) has not provided an address or the parties have not agreed on an address, the arbitration documents shall be sent to such party’s address as provided by the other party or its representative(s).3. Any arbitration correspondence to a party or its representative(s) shall be deemed to have been properly served on the party if delivered to the addressee or sent to the addressee’s place of business, registration, domicile, habitual residence or mailing address, or where, after reasonable inquiries by the other party, none of the aforesaid addresses can be found, the arbitrationcorrespondence is sent by the Secretariat of CIETAC to the addressee’s last known place of business, registration, domicile, habitual residence or mailing address by registered or express mail, or by any other means that can provide a record of the attempt at delivery.4. The periods of time specified in these Rules shall begin on the day following the day when the party receives or should have received the arbitration correspondence, notices or written materials sent by the Secretariat of CIETAC.Article 9 Bona Fide CooperationThe parties and their representatives shall proceed with the arbitration in bona fide cooperation.Article 10 Waiver of Right to ObjectA party shall be deemed to have waived its right to object where it knows or should have known that any provision of, or requirement under, these Rules has not been complied with and yet participates in or proceeds with the arbitration proceedings without promptly and explicitly submitting its objection in writing to such non-compliance.Chapter II Arbitration ProceedingsSection 1 Request for Arbitration, Defense and CounterclaimArticle 11 Commencement of ArbitrationThe arbitration proceedings shall commence on the day on which the Secretariat of CIETAC receives a Request for Arbitration.Article 12 Application for ArbitrationA party applying for arbitration under these Rules shall:1. Submit a Request for Arbitration in writing signed and/or sealed by the Claimant or its authorized representative(s), which shall, inter alia, include:(a) the names and addresses of the Claimant and the Respondent, including the zip code, telephone, fax, email, or any other means of electronic telecommunications;(b) a reference to the arbitration agreement that is invoked;(c) a statement of the facts of the case and the main issues in dispute;(d) the claim of the Claimant; and(e) the facts and grounds on which the claim is based.2. Attach to the Request for Arbitration the relevant documentary and other evidence on which the Claimant’s claim is based.3. Pay the arbitration fee in advance to CIETAC according to its Arbitration Fee Schedule.Article 13 Acceptance of a Case1. Upon a written application of a party, CIETAC shall accept a case in accordance with an arbitration agreement concluded between the parties either before or after the occurrence of the dispute, in which it is provided that disputes are to be referred to arbitration by CIETAC.2. Upon receipt of a Request for Arbitration and its attachments, if after examination, the Secretariat of CIETAC finds the formalities required for arbitration application to be complete, it shall send a Notice of Arbitration to both parties together with one copy each of these Rules and CIETAC’s Panel of Arbitrators. The Request for Arbitration and its attachments submitted by the Claimant shall be sent to the Respondent under the same cover.3. Where after examination the Secretariat of CIETAC finds the formalities required for the arbitration application to be incomplete, it may request the Claimant to complete them within a specified time period. The Claimant shall be deemed not to have submitted a Request for Arbitration if it fails to complete the required formalities within the specified time period. In such a case, the Claimant’s Request for Arbitration and its attachments shall not be kept on file by the Secretariat of CIETAC.4. After CIETAC accepts a case, its Secretariat shall designate a Case Manager to assist with the procedural administration of the case.Article 14 Statement of Defense1. The Respondent shall file a Statement of Defense in writing within forty-five (45) days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration. If the Respondent has justified reasons to request an extension of the time period, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to grant an extension. Where the arbitral tribunal has not yet been formed, the decision on whether to grant the extension of the time period shall be made by the Secretariat of CIETAC.2. The Statement of Defense shall be signed and/or sealed by the Respondent or its authorized representative(s), and shall, inter alia, include the following contents and attachments:(a) the name and address of the Respondent, including the zip code, telephone, fax, email, or any other means of electronic telecommunications;(b) the defense to the Request for Arbitration setting forth the facts and grounds on which the defense is based; and(c) the relevant documentary and other evidence on which the defense is based.3. The arbitral tribunal has the power to decide whether to accept a Statement of Defense submitted after the expiration of the above time limit.4. Failure by the Respondent to file a Statement of Defense shall not affect the conduct of the arbitration proceedings.Article 15 Counterclaim1. The Respondent shall file a counterclaim, if any, in writing within forty-five (45) days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration. If the Respondent has justified reasons to request an extension of the time period, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to grant an extension. Where the arbitral tribunal has not yet been formed, the decision on whether to grant the extension of the time period shall be made by the Secretariat of CIETAC.2. When filing its counterclaim, the Respondent shall specify its counterclaim in its Statement of Counterclaim and state the facts and grounds on which its counterclaim is based with the relevant documentary and other evidence attached thereto.3. When filing its counterclaim, the Respondent shall pay an arbitration fee in advance according to the Arbitration Fee Schedule of CIETAC within a specified time period, failing which the Respondent shall be deemed not to have filed any counterclaim.4. Where the formalities required for filing a counterclaim are found to be complete, the Secretariat of CIETAC shall send a Notice of Acceptance of Counterclaim to the parties. The Claimant shall submit its Statement of Defense in writing within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the Notice. If the Claimant has justified reasons to request an extension of the time period, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to grant such an extension. Where the arbitral tribunal has not yet been formed, the decision on whether to grant the extension of the time period shall be made by the Secretariat of CIETAC.5. The arbitral tribunal has the power to decide whether to accept a Statement of Defense submitted after the expiration of the above time limit.6. Failure of the Claimant to file a Statement of Defense to the Respondent’s counterclaim shall not affect the conduct of the arbitration proceedings.Article 16 Amendment to the Claim or CounterclaimThe Claimant may apply to amend its claim and the Respondent may apply to amend its counterclaim. However, the arbitral tribunal may not permit any such amendment if it considers that the amendment is too late and may delay the arbitration proceedings.Article 17 Consolidation of Arbitrations1. At the request of a party and with the agreement of all the other parties, or where CIETAC believes it necessary and all the parties have agreed, CIETAC may consolidate two or more arbitrations pending under these Rules into a single arbitration.2. In deciding whether to consolidate the arbitrations in accordance with the preceding Paragraph 1, CIETAC may take into account any factors it considers relevant in respect of the different arbitrations, including whether all of the claims in the different arbitrations are made under the same arbitration agreement, whether the different arbitrations are between the same parties, or whether one or more arbitrators have been nominated or appointed in the different arbitrations.3. Unless otherwise agreed by all the parties, the arbitrations shall be consolidated into the arbitration that was first commenced.Article 18 Submissions and Exchange of Arbitration Documents1. All arbitration documents from the parties shall be submitted to the Secretariat of CIETAC.2. All arbitration documents to be exchanged during the arbitration proceedings shall be exchanged among the arbitral tribunal and the parties by the Secretariat of CIETAC unless otherwise agreed by the parties and with the consent of the arbitral tribunal or otherwise decided by the arbitral tribunal.Article 19 Copies of SubmissionsWhen submitting the Request for Arbitration, the Statement of Defense, the Statement of Counterclaim, evidence, and other arbitration documents, the parties shall make their submissions in quintuplicate. Where there are multiple parties, additional copies shall be provided accordingly. Where preservation of property or protection of evidence is applied for, the party shall also provide additional copies accordingly. Where the arbitral tribunal is composed of a sole arbitrator, the number of copies submitted may be reduced by two.Article 20 RepresentationA party may be represented by its authorized Chinese and/or foreign representative(s) in handling matters relating to the arbitration. In such a case, a Power of Attorney shall be forwarded to the Secretariat of CIETAC by the party or its authorized representative(s).Article 21 Conservatory and Interim Measures1. Where a party applies for conservatory measures pursuant to the laws of the P eople’s Republic of China, the secretariat of CIETAC shall forward the party’s application to the competent court designated by that party in accordance with the law.2. At the request of a party, the arbitral tribunal may order any interim measure it deems necessary or proper in accordance with the applicable law, and may require the requesting party to provide appropriate security in connection with the measure. The order of an interim measure by the arbitral tribunal may take the form of a procedural order or an interlocutory award.Section 2 Arbitrators and the Arbitral TribunalArticle 22 Duties of ArbitratorAn arbitrator shall not represent either party, and shall be and remain independent of the parties and treat them equally.Article 23 Number of Arbitrators1. The arbitral tribunal shall be composed of one or three arbitrators.2. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties or provided by these Rules, the arbitral tribunal shall be composed of three arbitrators.Article 24 Nomination or Appointment of Arbitrator1. CIETAC establishes a Panel of Arbitrators which uniformly applies to itself and all its sub-commissions/centers. The parties shall nominate arbitrators from the Panel of Arbitrators provided by CIETAC.2. Where the parties have agreed to nominate arbitrators from outside CIETAC’s Panel of Arbitrators, an arbitrator so nominated by the parties or nominated according to the agreement of the parties may act as arbitrator subject to the confirmation by the Chairman of CIETAC in accordance with the law.Article 25 Three-Arbitrator Tribunal1. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, the Claimant and the Respondent shall each nominate, or entrust theChairman of CIETAC to appoint, an arbitrator, failing which the arbitrator shall be appointed by the Chairman of CIETAC.2. Within fifteen (15) days from the date of the Respondent’s receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, the parties shall jointly nominate, or entrust the Chairman of CIETAC to appoint, the third arbitrator, who shall act as the presiding arbitrator.3. The parties may each recommend one to five arbitrators as candidates for presiding arbitrator and shall each submit a list of recommended candidates within the time period specified in the preceding Paragraph 2. Where there is only one common candidate on the lists, such candidate shall be the presiding arbitrator jointly nominated by the parties. Where there is more than one common candidate on the lists, the Chairman of CIETAC shall choose a presiding arbitrator from among the common candidates having regard to the circumstances of the case, and he/she shall act as the presiding arbitrator jointly nominated by the parties. Where there is no common candidate on the lists, the presiding arbitrator shall be appointed by the Chairman of CIETAC.4. Where the parties have failed to jointly nominate the presiding arbitrator according to the above provisions, the presiding arbitrator shall be appointed by the Chairman of CIETAC.Article 26 Sole-Arbitrator TribunalWhere the arbitral tribunal is composed of one arbitrator, the sole arbitrator shall be nominated pursuant to the procedures stipulated in Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of Article 25 of these Rules.Article 27 Multiple-Party Tribunal1. Where there are two or more Claimants and/or Respondents in an arbitration case, the Claimant side and/or the Respondent side, following consultations, shall each jointly nominate or jointly entrust the Chairman of CIETAC to appoint one arbitrator.2. The presiding arbitrator or the sole arbitrator shall be nominated in accordance with the procedures stipulated in Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of Article 25 of these Rules. When making such nomination pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 25 of these Rules, the Claimant side and/or the Respondent side,following consultations, shall each submit a list of their jointly agreed candidates.3. Where either the Claimant side or the Respondent side fails to jointly nominate or jointly entrust the Chairman of CIETAC with appointing one arbitrator within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, the Chairman of CIETAC shall appoint all three members of the arbitral tribunal and designate one of them to act as the presiding arbitrator.Article 28 Considerations in Appointing ArbitratorsWhen appointing arbitrators pursuant to these Rules, the Chairman of CIETAC shall take into consideration the law as it applies to the dispute, the place of arbitration, the language of arbitration, the nationalities of the parties, and any other factor(s) the Chairman considers relevant.Article 29 Disclosure1. An arbitrator nominated by the parties or appointed by the Chairman of CIETAC shall sign a Declaration and disclose any facts or circumstances likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his/her impartiality or independence.2. If circumstances that need to be disclosed arise during the arbitration proceedings, the arbitrator shall promptly disclose such circumstances in writing.3. The Declaration and/or the disclosure of the arbitrator shall be submitted to the Secretariat of CIETAC and communicated to the parties by the Secretariat of CIETAC.Article 30 Challenge to the Arbitrator1. Upon receipt of the Declaration and/or the written disclosure of an arbitrator,a party which intends to challenge the arbitrator on the grounds of the facts or circumstances disclosed by the arbitrator shall forward the challenge in writing within ten (10) days from the date of such receipt. If a party fails to file a challenge within the above time period, it may not subsequently challenge the arbitrator on the basis of the matters disclosed by the arbitrator.2. A party which has justifiable doubts as to the impartiality or independence of an arbitrator may challenge that arbitrator in writing and shall state the facts and reasons on which the challenge is based with supporting evidence.3. A party may challenge an arbitrator in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date it receives the Notice of Formation of the Arbitral tribunal. Where a party becomes aware of a reason for a challenge after such receipt, the party may challenge the arbitrator in writing within fifteen (15) days after such reason has become known, but no later than the conclusion of the last oral hearing.4. The challenge by one party shall be promptly communicated to the other party, the arbitrator being challenged and the other members of the arbitral tribunal.5. Where an arbitrator is challenged by one party and the other party agrees to the challenge, or the arbitrator being challenged voluntarily withdraws from his/her office, such arbitrator shall no longer be a member of the arbitral tribunal. However, in neither case shall it be implied that the reasons for the challenge are sustained.6. In circumstances other than those specified in the preceding Paragraph 5, the Chairman of CIETAC shall make a final decision on the challenge with or without stating the reasons.7. An arbitrator who has been challenged shall continue to serve on the arbitral tribunal until a final decision on the challenge has been made by the Chairman of CIETAC.Article 31 Replacement of Arbitrator1. In the event that an arbitrator is prevented de jure or de facto from fulfilling his/her functions, or fails to fulfill his/her functions in accordance with the requirements of these Rules or within the time period specified in these Rules, the Chairman of CIETAC shall have the power to decide to replace the arbitrator. Such arbitrator may also voluntarily withdraw from his/her office.2. The Chairman of CIETAC shall make a final decision on whether or not an arbitrator should be replaced with or without stating the reasons.3. In the event that an arbitrator is unable to fulfill his/her functions due to being challenged or replaced, a substitute arbitrator shall be nominated according to the same procedure and time period that applied to the nomination of the arbitrator being challended or replaced. If a party fails to nominate a substitute arbitrator accordingly, the substitute arbitrator shall be appointed by the Chairman of CIETAC.4. After the replacement of an arbitrator, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether and to what extent the previous proceedings in the case shall be repeated.Article 32 Majority Continuation of ArbitrationAfter the conclusion of the last oral hearing, if an arbitrator on a three-member tribunal is unable to participate in the deliberations and/or to render the award owing to his/her demise or to his/her removal from CI ETAC’s Panel of Arbitrators, or for any other reason, the other two arbitrators may request the Chairman of CIETAC to replace that arbitrator pursuant to Article 31 of these Rules. After consulting with the parties and upon the approval of the Chairman of CIETAC, the other two arbitrators may also continue the arbitration proceedings and make decisions, rulings, or render the award. The Secretariat of CIETAC shall notify the parties of the above circumstances.Section 3 HearingArticle 33 Conduct of Hearing1. The arbitral tribunal shall examine the case in any way it deems appropriate unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Under all circumstances, the arbitral tribunal shall act impartially and fairly and shall afford a reasonable opportunity to all parties to make submissions and arguments.2. The arbitral tribunal shall hold oral hearings when examining the case. However, the arbitral tribunal may examine the case on the basis of documents only if the parties so agree and the arbitral tribunal consents or the arbitral tribunal deems that oral hearings are unnecessary and the parties so agree.。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则(《仲裁规则》)，为各方解决国际经济贸易纠纷提供快捷、高效、公平义利的仲裁机制。

《仲裁规则》收集、整理和运用国际仲裁的普遍原则、准则和国际惯例，完善中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会的仲裁机制，以实现中国对经济贸易仲裁的更加高效、更加及时的执行。

《仲裁规则》经历了数次修订，目前正式实施的版本为2013年修订的第九次版本。

新版《仲裁规则》包括实施细则和实施方案，旨在以多种方式调和仲裁的过程，以降低仲裁费用，减少仲裁期限，提高仲裁效率。

《仲裁规则》的主要内容《仲裁规则》的主要内容包括：（1）仲裁受理与裁决：根据当事人的意愿，仲裁委员会仲裁受理仲裁时应注意的原则；关于仲裁裁决的内容、形式和有效性；仲裁裁决的履行及其终止；仲裁无效性或无可履行性的裁定；关于仲裁程序等有关规定。

（2）仲裁庭：对仲裁庭的成员以及仲裁庭决定的原则；仲裁庭决定的有效性和执行以及变更、终止的规定等。

（3）仲裁程序：包括庭外审理程序；法定仲裁期限；开庭审理程序；付款要求程序；仲裁庭决定审查程序；仲裁庭成员更换程序等。

（4）其他事项：关于国际仲裁会议会场的召开；仲裁机构可享受的特殊权利及免除的义务；仲裁费用收取及其管理等。

《仲裁规则》的重要性《仲裁规则》既促进了仲裁机制的发展，也促进了国际经济贸易仲裁的社会性效应，起到了良好的社会效益。

首先，《仲裁规则》旨在促进司法问责，把法律制度融入仲裁程序，提高仲裁精确性和及时性，促进仲裁结果的执行。

其次，《仲裁规则》将仲裁程序与中国传统文化及现代仲裁技术等元素相结合，构建了一套同时融入中国文化特色的仲裁机制，使仲裁在传统的中国文化框架内展开，对国内社会发展非常有益。

最后，《仲裁规则》改善和完善了国际仲裁的仲裁机制，为国家提供了一种有效的促进国际经济贸易秩序的有效措施。

综上所述，中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则(《仲裁规则》)对中国社会发展具有重要意义，对国际经济贸易秩序也有着独特的作用。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁程序1、、答辩与反诉申请人应向提交仲裁申请书，附具有关证明文件;在名册中指定一名仲裁员，或者委托仲裁委员会主任指定;预缴费。

仲裁委员会秘书局收到仲裁申请及。

附件后，经审查认为申请手续完备，应将仲裁申请书及其附件，连同和仲裁员名册各一份，寄送给被申请人。

被申请人应在收到仲裁申请书之日起20天内在仲裁员名册中指定一名仲裁员，或者委托仲裁委员会主任指定，并应在收到仲裁申请书之日起45天内向仲裁委员会秘书局提交答辩书及有关证明文件。

被申请人如有反诉，最迟应在收到仲裁通知之日起60天内以书面提交仲裁委员会秘书局;在反诉中应写明具体的反诉请求，反诉理由以及所依据的事实和理由，并附上有关证据文件;预缴仲裁费。

2、的组成双方应各在仲裁员名册中指定和委托仲裁委员会主任指定一名仲裁员，第三名仲裁员由双方当事人共同选定或共同委托仲裁委员会主任指定。

若双方当事人在被申请人收到仲裁通知之日起20天内未能共同选定或者共同委托仲裁委员会主任指定第三名仲裁员，则由仲裁委员会主任指定。

第三名仲裁员担任首席仲裁员。

双方当事人可在仲裁员名册同指定或委托仲裁委员会主任指定一名仲裁员为独任仲裁员，成立仲裁庭，单独审理案件。

若双方当事人约定由一名仲裁员审理案件，但在被申请人收到仲裁通知之日起20天内未能就独任仲裁员的人选达成一致意见，则由仲裁委员会主任指定。

3、审理仲裁庭应开庭审理案件。

但经双方当事人申请或者征得双方当事人同意，仲裁庭也认为不必开庭审理的，仲裁庭可以只依据书面文件进行审理并做出裁决。

仲裁案件第一次开庭审理的日期，经仲裁庭商仲裁委员会秘书局决定后，由秘书局于开庭前30天通知双方当事人。

当事人有正当理由的，可请求延期，但应在开庭前12天以书面形式向秘书局提出;是否延期，由仲裁庭决定。

仲裁庭开庭审理案件不公开进行，如果双方当事人要求公开审理，由仲裁庭决定是否公开审理。

4、仲裁庭应在组庭后九个月内做出仲裁裁决书。

中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会网上仲裁规则（中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会2009年1月8日通过，2009年5月1日施行）第一章总则第一条为以在线方式独立公正、高效经济地仲裁契约性或非契约性的经济贸易等争议，特制定本规则。

本规则适用于解决电子商务争议，也可适用于解决当事人约定适用本规则的其他经济贸易争议。

第二条本规则下列术语的含义是：1、仲裁委员会：指中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会（又名中国国际商会仲裁院）；2、仲裁委员会仲裁规则：指由中国国际贸易促进委员会/中国国际商会于2005年1月11日修订并通过，于2005年5月1日起施行的《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》及其以后的修订本；3、仲裁委员会仲裁员名册：指中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会于2008年5月1日起施行的《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员仲裁员名册》及其以后的修订本；4、仲裁委员会网上争议解决中心：指中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会下设的、专门以网上争议解决方式解决网络域名、电子商务等争议的机构。

5、仲裁委员会网上争议解决中心网站：指仲裁委员会网上争议解决中心建立的、主要从事网上争议解决的专门网站。

仲裁委员会网上争议解决中心目前的网址是。

6、书面形式：指合同书、信件和数据电文（包括电报、电1传、传真、电子数据交换和电子邮件）等能够有形地表现所载内容并可以随时调取查用的信息记载形式；7、电子证据：指以电子、光学、磁或者类似手段生成、发送、接收或者储存的数据电文；8、电子签名：指数据电文中以电子形式所含、所附用于识别签名人身份并表明签名人认可其中内容的数据。

9、网上开庭：指利用互联网以网络视频会议及其他电子或者计算机通讯形式所进行的庭审活动；10、网上调解：指利用互联网以网络视频会议及其他电子或者计算机通讯形式所进行的调解活动。

第三条仲裁委员会受理的案件，当事人约定适用本规则的，适用本规则；当事人未约定适用本规则的，适用《中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会仲裁规则》或当事人约定的其他规则。