Translation Studies and Practice

Thetheoryandpracticeoftranslation奈达的翻译理论与实践The theory and practice of translationEugene A. Nida and Charles R. Taber 1974Contents1.A new concept of translation2.The nature of translating3.Grammatical analysis4.Referential meaning5.Connotative meaning6.Transfer7.Restructuring8.Testing the translationChapter One The old focus and the new focusThe older focus in translating was the form of the message, and the translator too particular delight in being able to reproduce stylistic specialties, ., rhythms, rhymes, plays on words, chiasmus, parallelism, and usual grammatical structures. The new focus, however, has shifted from teh form of the message to the response of the receptor. Therefore, what one must determine is the response of the receptor to te translated message, this response must be compared with the way in which the original receptors presumably reacted to the message when it was given in its original setting.Chapter Two Translating consists in reproducing in the receptor language the closest natural equivalent of the source-language message, first in terms of meaning and secondly in terms of style. But this relatively simple statement requires careful evaluation of several seeminglycontradictory elements.Reproducing the messageTranslating must aim primarily at “reproducing the message.” To do anything else is essentially false to one’s task as a translator. But to reproduce the message one must make a good many grammatical and lexical adjustments. Equivalence rather than identityThe translator must strive for the equivalence rather than identity. In a sense, this is just another way of emphasizing the reproduction of the message rather than the conversation of the form of the utterance, but it reinforces the need for radical alteration of a phrase, which may be quiet meaningless.A natural equivalentThe best translation does not sound like a translation. In other words, a good translation of the Bible must not be “cultural translation”. Rather, it is a “linguistic translation”. That is to say, it should studiously avoid “translationese”--formal fidelity, with resulting unfaithfulness to the content and the impact of the message.The priority of meaningAs has already been indicted in the definition of translating, meaning must be given priority, for it os the content of the message which is of prime importance for Bible translating.The significance of styleThough style is secondary to content, it is nevertheless important, one should not translate poetry as though it were prose, nor expository material as though it were straight narrative.In trying to reproduce the style of the original one must beware, however, of producing something which is not functionally equivalent.A system of prioritiesAs a a basis for judging what should be done in specific instances of translating, it is essential to establish certain fundamental sets of priorities: (1) contextual consistency has priority over verbal consistency ( or word-for-word concordance), (2) dynamic equivalence has priority over formal correspondence, (3) the aural form of language has priority over the written form, (4) forms that are used by and acceptable to the audience for which a translation is intended have priority over forms that may be traditionally more perspectives.The priority of dynamic equivalence over formal correspondenceIf we look at the translations in terms of the receptors, rather than in terms of their respective forms, then we introduce another point of view; the intelligibility of the translation. Such intelligibility is not, however, to be measured merely in terms of whether the words are understandable, and the sentences grammatically constructed, but in terms of the total impact, the message has on the one who receives it.Dynamic equivalence is therefore to be defined in terms of the degree to which the receptors of the message in the receptor language respond to it in substantially the same manner as the receptor in the sourcelanguage. This response can never be identical, fro the culture and historical settings are too different, but there should be a high degree of equivalence of response, or the translation will have failed to accomplish its purpose.It would be wrong to think, however, that the response of the receptors in the second language is merely in terms of comprehension of the information, for communication is not merely informative. It must also be expressive and imperative if it is to serve the principal purposes of communications.Of course, persons may insist that by its very nature a dynamic equivalent translation is a less “accurate” translation, for it departs further from the forms of the original. To argue in this manner, however, is to use “accurate”in a formal sense, whereas accuracy can only be rightly determined by judging the extent to which the response of the receptor is substantially equivalent to the respond of the original receptors. In other words, does the dynamic equivalent translation succeed more completely in evoking in the receptors responses which are substantially equivalent to those experienced by the original receptors If “accuracy”is to be judged in this light, then certainly the dynamic equivalent translation is not only moe meaningful to the receptors but also more accurate. This assumes, of course, that both the formal correspondence translation and the dynamic equivalent translation do not contain any overt errors of exegesis.Grammatical analysisThere are three major steps in analysis: (1) determining the mining themeaningful relationships between the words and combinations of words, (2) the referential meaning of the words and special combinations of words, idioms, (3) the connotative meaning.Kernel sentencesWe soon discover that we have simply recast the expressions so that events are expressed as verbs, objects as nouns, abstracts (quantities and qualities) as adjectives or adverbs. The only other terms are relationals, ., the prepositions and conjunctions.These restructures expressions are basically what many linguistics call “kernels”; that is to say, they are the basic structural elements out of which the language builds its elaborate surface structures. In fact, one of the most important insights coming from “transformational grammar” is the fact that in all languages there are half a dozen to a dozen basic structures out of which all the more elaborate formations are constructed by means of so called “transformations”. In contrast, back transformation, then, is the analytic process of reducing the surface structure to its underlying kernels.Semantic adjustments made in transferIn transferring the message from one language to another, it is the content which must be preserved at any cost; the form, except in special cases, such as poetry, is largely secondary, since within each language, the rules for relating content to form are highly complex, arbitrary, and variable.Of course, if by coincidence it is possible to convey the same contentin the receptor language in a form which closely resembles that of the source, so much the better; we preserve the form when we can, but more than the form has to be transformed precisely in order to preserve the content. An expressive effort topreserve the form inevitably results in a serious loss or distortion of the message.Obviously in any translation there will be a type of “loss”of semantic content, but the process should be so designed as to keep this to a minimum. The commonest problems of the content transfer arise in the following areas: (1) idioms, (2) figurative meanings, (3) shifts in central components of meaning, (4) generic and specific meanings, (5) pleonastic expressions, (6) special formulas, (7) redistribution of semantic components, (8) provision for contextual conditioning.(8)In other instances one may find it important to employ a descriptive phrase so as to provide some basis for comprehending the significance of the original.It must be further emphasized that one is not free to make in the text any and all kinds of explanatory additions and/or expansions.Testing the translationOnce the process of restructuring has been completed, the next essential step is th e testing of the translation. This should cover the entire range of possible problems: accuracy of rendering, intelligibility, stylistic equivalence, etc. But to do this, one must focus attention not upon the extent of verbal correspondence but upon the amount of dynamic equivalence. This does not mean, of course, that the translation isjudged merely on the extent to which people like the contents. Some people may object strongly to the themes and the concepts which are communicated, but there should not be anything in the translation itself which is stylistically awkward, structurally burdensome, linguistically unnatural, and semantically misleading or incomprehensible, unless, of course, the message in the source language has these characteristics ( the task of the translator is to produce the closest natural equivalent, not to edit or to rewrite). But to judge these qualities one must look to the potential users.The problem of overall lengthIt only means that in the process of transfer from one linguistic and cultural structure to another, it is almost inevitable that the resulting translation will turn out to be longer.This tendency to greater length is due essentially to the fact that one wishes to state everything that is in the original communication but is also obliged to amke explicit in the receptor language what could very well remain implicit in the source language text, since te original receivers of this communication presumably had all the necessary background to understand the contents of the message.He analyzes its components builds in proper redundancy by making explicit what is implicit in the original, and then produces something the readers in the receptor language will be able to understand.Types of expansionsThe expansions may perhaps be most conveniently divided between syntactic(or formal) expansions and lexical (or semantic) ones.Lexical expansions in marginal helpsIn making explicit what is fully implicit in the original translation, one can ofter insert material in the text itself without imposing undue strains upon the process of translation.Such information may only be part of the general cultural background shared by the participants in the source language. This type of information cannot be legitimately introduced into the text of a translation, but should be placed in marginal helps, either in the form of glossaries, where information about recurring terms is gathered together in summary fashion, or in marginal notes on the page where the difficulty in understanding occurs.Practical textsTherefore, if a translator really wants to obtain satisfactory replies to direct questions on specific problems, the only way to do so is by supplying people with alternatives. This means that one must read a sentence in two or more ways, ofter repeating such alternatives slowly (and , of course, in context). And then ask such questions as: “which way sounds thesweetest”“which is planner”...Explaining the contentsA secondary very important way of testing a translation is to have someone read a passage to someone else and then to get this individual to explain the contents to other persons, who did not hear the reading.Reading the text aloudPublication of sample materialThe ultimate basis for judging a translation。

(完整)《翻译理论与实践》课程阅读书目编辑整理：尊敬的读者朋友们：这里是精品文档编辑中心，本文档内容是由我和我的同事精心编辑整理后发布的，发布之前我们对文中内容进行仔细校对，但是难免会有疏漏的地方，但是任然希望（(完整)《翻译理论与实践》课程阅读书目）的内容能够给您的工作和学习带来便利。

同时也真诚的希望收到您的建议和反馈，这将是我们进步的源泉，前进的动力。

本文可编辑可修改，如果觉得对您有帮助请收藏以便随时查阅，最后祝您生活愉快业绩进步，以下为(完整)《翻译理论与实践》课程阅读书目的全部内容。

闽江学院《翻译理论与实践》课程（学生课外阅读参考书目）1、 Bell, Roger. T。

1991， 2001. Translation and Translating： Theory and Practice [M］. London：Longman Group UK Ltd.；Beijing：Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.2、 Benjamin， W。

1993。

The Task of the Translator［A]。

In: L。

Venuti ed. 2000. The TranslationStudies Reader［C]. London ＆ New York: Routledge。

3、 Davis, K. 2004。

Deconstruction and Translation ［M]. Shanghai: ShanghaiForeignLanguage Education Press。

4、 Hatim, Basil and Mason, Ian. 1990, 2001。

Discourse and the Translator［M］。

London:Longman Group UK Ltd.； Shanghai： Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press。

你买点什么翻译英语作文Title: What to Buy: Exploring the Art of Translation。

In the realm of translation, the choices one makes can significantly impact the final outcome. From selecting the right words to capturing the essence of the original text, each decision shapes the journey from one language to another. So, when faced with the question, "What to buy?" in the context of translation, the considerations are vast and nuanced.Firstly, investing in language resources is paramount. High-quality dictionaries, both bilingual and monolingual, serve as the bedrock of translation. They provide not only translations of words but also nuanced meanings, idiomatic expressions, and cultural insights. Online platforms like Oxford Languages and Cambridge Dictionary offer comprehensive resources for various languages, aiding translators in their quest for precision and fluency.Additionally, acquiring specialized glossaries and terminology databases can elevate the quality of technical translations. In fields such as medicine, law, and engineering, accuracy is non-negotiable. Therefore, purchasing access to industry-specific terminologyresources ensures that translations meet professional standards and effectively communicate complex concepts across language barriers.Furthermore, subscribing to translation software and tools can streamline the translation process and enhance productivity. Programs like SDL Trados and MemoQ offer features such as translation memory, terminology management, and machine translation integration. While human expertise remains irreplaceable in translation, these tools serve as invaluable aids, especially for large-scale projects and repetitive texts.Investing in language courses and professional development opportunities is another wise purchase for translators. Continuous learning not only improveslinguistic proficiency but also deepens culturalunderstanding and expands subject matter expertise. Workshops, seminars, and online courses conducted by reputable institutions and industry experts provide valuable insights into translation theory, practice, and emerging trends.Moreover, building a personal library of translated works and reference materials can enrich one's translation practice. Studying translations by renowned translators offers valuable lessons in style, tone, and creative adaptation. Additionally, reference books on translation theory and practice, such as "The Translator's Handbook" by Morry Sofer and "Translation Studies" by Susan Bassnett, provide theoretical frameworks and practical guidance for aspiring translators.In the digital age, investing in an ergonomic workstation equipped with high-speed internet, dual monitors, and ergonomic furniture is essential for translators. A comfortable and efficient workspace minimizes distractions and maximizes productivity, allowing translators to focus their energy on the intricacies oflanguage and meaning.Lastly, networking and collaboration are invaluable investments for translators. Joining professional associations like the American Translators Association (ATA) or the International Federation of Translators (FIT) provides access to a supportive community of fellow translators, mentors, and potential clients. Collaborating with other linguists on projects fosters mutual learningand growth, expanding one's skill set and professional network.In conclusion, the art of translation encompasses a myriad of choices and investments. From language resources and software tools to professional development and networking, each purchase contributes to the translator's journey towards excellence. By carefully selecting and investing in the right resources, translators can navigate the complexities of language and culture with confidenceand precision, enriching the world with the beauty of multilingual communication.。

对The Theory and Practice of Translation书中翻译理论的理解概括尤金・奈达是美国当代著名的语言学家、翻译家,也是西方语言学派翻译理论的主要代表之一,他发展了英国著名翻译理论家纽马克提出的交际翻译理论。

交际法的翻译理论不仅照顾到语言意义的传递,也考虑到功能的对应,解决了原来的翻译理论从语言本身解决不了的问题。

上世纪80年代初,奈达的翻译理论传到中国并备受推崇。

奈达的翻译理论使我国大多数翻译工作者开始接触西方系统的翻译理论,对中国的翻译理论研究影响非常大,以致在当时中国的翻译界形成了言必称奈达的局面。

80年代末90年代初,对奈达的翻译理论的质颖之声开始出现,90年代中期以后,进而出现了“言必称奈达理论之缺陷”的风潮,大有对其全盘否定之势。

近几年,译界开始了对奈达的翻译理论的冷静反思。

在中国翻译界舆有巨大影响力的翻译理论除了严复的“信、达、雅”外，想必就是奈达的理论ｒ。

自从它传人中图以来，沉寂多年的巾国译坛开始活跃起来，中国的翻译王作者感受羁了一黢算竣翡蘩译瑾沦豹春弧，菝享孛免之一振。

眼界也开阕了，此后的翻泽理沦与实践便出现了畜必称奈达的现象，可见奈达理论的影响之大：奈达的理论属于科学的翻译理论体系，它之所以会在世界范同内有如此大的影响就在于它的科学性。

奈选的翻译思想体现在｛也不同时期的薯住巾，两最能充分体现缝主要，也是较袋熬豹秘译愚怒的怒《赣泽瑾论与实践》一书。

该书获潺裔学的角度对麟译的过程进行了全丽、系统的分析，为翻译实践提供了理沦指导。

全书共分为八章，前两章主要从火体上概述了翻译中常见的同题，剩下的章节具体论述了翻译的过程，即分援、转换、重组、检测。

筹一章楚要套缨了一些关于翻译豹耨观点，如酾译的羹点放语言形式转囱读者反应，这楚奈达翻泽思想的核心内容。

此外．他还认为语言是有共住的．尽管各种语言都有各自的特点，一种语言能表达的枣情也能用另一种讲辫表达。

他在第二章提出了动态对镲的观点，认为翻译怒在译语中爆最切邀丽又最自然的对等渗霉臻源语的傣患，善壳是意义。

Translation Studies in Theory and PracticeThesis: After half-year study of translation, I have grabbed comprehensive knowledge in this field, which has greatly changed my previous attitude, now I realized that translation is not a simple work every English learner could undertake. In this paper, I demonstrate my understanding towards translation that I have learned from many relative resources, not only my knowledge of translation, but also the translation skills cultivated by those resources. The main purpose is to demonstrate the application of these learning resources to my study and to analyze my understanding of translation by learning these resources.I. Introduction (300w)Good theory is based on information gained from practice. Good practice is based on carefully worked-out theory. The two are interdependent. This perfectly reflects the relationship between translation theory and translation practice.The ideal translation will be accurate as to meaning and natural as to the target language forms used. The reader who is unfamiliar with the source text will understand it well. The success of a translation is measured by how closely you translate to the measurement.The ideal translation should be:1: Accurate: reproducing as exactly as possible the meaning of the source text.2 Natural: using natural forms of the receptor language in a way that is appropriate to the kind of text being translated.3 Communicative: expressing all aspects of the meaning in a way that is readily understandable to the intended audience.Translation is a process based on the theory that it is possible to abstract the meaning of a text from its forms and reproduce that meaning with the very different forms of a second language.Translation, then, consists of studying the lexicon, grammatical structure, communication situation, and cultural context of the source language text, analyzing it in order to determine its meaning, and then reconstructing this same meaning using the lexicon and grammatical structure which are appropriate in the receptor language and its cultural context.In practice, there is considerable variation in the types of translations produced by translators. Some translators work only in two languages and are competent in both. Others work from their first language to their second language, and still others from their second language to their first language.In the era of information explosion, everyone is faced up with a plethora of resources, from the most traditional media such as books, academic conferences, to the online dictionaries and onlinetranslation software. In this thesis, we will roughly study how these resources influence will be applied to improve our translation.II. The Application of the Translation Resources (800w)A. Application of Theoretic ResourceB. Application of Practical Resourcea. The Understanding of Bilingual Translation Strategyb. The Understanding of Bicultural Translation StrategyC. Application of Translation SoftwareIII. Evaluation of the Influence (500w)A. Influence of Language AbilityB. Influence of Translation SkillC. Influence of Cultural AwarenessIV. ConclusionReferenceEdwin, Gentzler, Contemporary Translation Theories, Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press, China, 2004Feng, Qinghua, The Research in the Art of Translation of ‘The Dream of Red Mansion’, Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press, China, 2006Munday, Jeremy, Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications, Routledge, USA and Canada, 2001Sakai, Naoki, ‘Translation’ in T heory, Culture & Society, Vol. 23, Issue 2,3, Middlesbrough Yorkshire, London, 2006Ye, Zinan, Advanced English-Chinese Translation Theory and Practice, Tsinghua University Press, China, 2001Zhang, Peiji, A Course in English-Chinese Translation, Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press China, 2003Zhu, Jifang, An English-Chinese Translation Method and Practice, Beijing University Press, China, 2004论点：经过半年多对翻译的研究，我已经获得了这一领域的全面知识，而这极大地改变了我以前的态度，对每一个英语学习者来说它都不是一项可以承担的简单的工作。

翻译理论与实践（汉译英）Translation Theories and Practice (Chinese-English Translation )Teaching Notes for Senior College Students（2005年9月）刘国忠2578706*************.cnTopics at first:1. 解读汉译英《教学大纲》2. 解读汉译英《考试大纲》3. 汉译英学习指导①重要性②特性③实践性汉译英精典教材：1. 《英汉翻译教程》张培基喻天根《汉英翻译教程》吕瑞昌喻天根上海外语教育出版社 1980.92.《汉英翻译基础》陈宏薇上海外语教育出版社 1998/23.《英汉互译实用教程》宋天锡等国防工业出版社2000/14.《实用翻译教程》（英汉互译）增订本冯庆华上海外语教育出版社2002/55.《实用汉英翻译教程》曾诚外语教学与研究出版社2002/46.《翻译教学：实务与理论》刘宓庆中国对外翻译出版公司2003/1•汉译英主要内容：•一、汉译英实务教学•二、历届TEM8汉译英试卷评析•三、汉译英练习与评析•—汉英翻译强化训练汉译英实务教学主要内容一、汉英词语对比二、汉英句法基本差异（一）汉英句子的主语比较三、汉英句法基本差异（二）汉语谓语动词的分析和翻译四、被动语态的翻译五、汉译英中的主谓定位六、汉译英中的句子整合问题增补内容：七、如何避免翻译中的Chinglish八、汉英翻译中的文化传递九、公示语的翻译十、历届TEM8汉译英试卷评析十一、汉译英练习与评析—汉英翻译强化训练汉译英学习指导（一）如何保证翻译课的教学效果1.以―正当程序‖保证翻译质量无论英译汉，还是汉译英，译文都需要准确、通顺，这是翻译的基本要求。

表达准确的基础是对原文的准确理解：译者必须准确地理解原文的每个词、每句话和作者的意图。

表达通顺的基础是对译入语的熟练运用。

我们在做汉译英时，存在一个天然的劣势：由于英语不是我们的母语，做到表达的准确和通顺相当困难。

理论与实践方向参考书目1. 中文部分《口译技巧》＜法＞达尼卡．塞莱斯科伟奇著，孙慧双译．北京：北京出版社，１９７９年１２月第一版．《英汉翻译手册》钟述孔。

北京：商务印书馆，１９８０年３月第一版。

《翻译理论与技巧论文集》。

本公司选编，中国对外翻译出版公司，１９８３年８月第一版。

《外国翻译理论评介文集》本公司选编，中国对外翻译出版公司，１９８３年８月第一版。

《意态山来画不成？―――文学翻译丛谈》翁显良，北京：中国对外翻译出版公司，１９８３年１２月第一版。

《翻译研究论文集》（１８９４－１９４８）中国翻译工作者协会《翻译通讯》编辑部编，北京：外语教学与研究出版社，１９８４年２月第一版。

《翻译研究论文集》（１９４９－１９８３）中国翻译工作者协会《翻译通讯》编辑部编，北京：外语教学与研究出版社，１９８４年１１月第一版。

《翻译论集》罗新璋编，北京：商务印书馆，１９８４年５月第一版。

《新编奈达论翻译》谭载喜编，北京：中国对外翻译出版公司，１９９９年１０月第一版。

《翻译的艺术》许渊冲，北京：中国对外翻译出版公司，１９８４年１０月第一版。

《七缀集》钱钟书，上海：上海古籍出版社，１９８５年第一版。

《文体与翻译》刘宓庆，北京：中国对外翻译出版公司，１９８６年３月第一版。

《文学翻译原理》张今。

开封：河南大学出版社，１９８７年９月第一版。

《等效翻译探索》金隄，北京：中国对外翻译出版公司。

１９８９年４月第一版，１９９８年７月第二版。

《翻译：思考与试笔》王佐良，北京：外语教学与研究出版社。

《中国翻译文学史稿》陈玉刚，北京：中国对外翻译出版公司，１９８９年８月第一版。

《当代翻译理论》刘宓庆，北京：中国对外翻译出版公司，１９９９年８月第一版。

《西方翻译简史》谭载喜，北京：商务印书馆１９９１年５月第一版。

《中国译学理论史稿》陈福康，上海：上海外语教育出版社，１９９２年１１月第一版，２０００年６月第二版。

《中国当代翻译百论》杜承南、文军主编。

翻译理论与实践研究参考文献一、外语教学与研究出版社：1. Baker, M. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation 换言之：翻译教程2. Bell, R. T. Translation and Translating : Theory and Practice译文与翻译：理论与实践3.申雨平、戴宁、范仲英实用翻译教程4. 王克非从翻译史看文化差异5. 王佐良、丁往道英语文体学引论二、上海外语教育出版社：1. 王克非翻译文化史论2. 谢天振翻译的理论建构与文化透视3. Newmark, Peter: Approaches to Translation翻译问题探讨4. Steiner, George: After Babel—Aspects of Language and Translation(3rd ed. )通天塔之后――语言与翻译面面观5. Toury, Gideon: Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyon 描述翻译学及其它6. Hatin, Basil and Ian Mason: Discourse and the Translator语篇与译者7. Newmark, Peter: textbook of Translation 翻译教程8. Nord, Christiane: Translating as a Purposeful Activity—Functionalist Approaches Explained目的性行为――析功能翻译理论9. Bassnett, Susan and Andre Lefevere: Constructing Cultures—Essays on Literary Translation文化构建――文学翻译论集10. Hickey, Leo (ed.): The Pragmatics of Translation语用学与翻译11. Hatim, Basil: Communication Across Cultures: Translation Theory and Contrastive Text Linguistics跨文化交际：翻译理论与对比篇章语言学12. Wilss, Wolfram: The Science of Translation: Problems and Methods 翻译学：问题与方法13. Nida, Eugene A.:Language and Culture: Contexts in Translating语言与文化：翻译中的语境14. SnelI-Hornby, Mary: Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach翻译研究：综合法15. Davis, Kathleen: Deconstruction and Translation 解构主义与翻译16. Hermans, Thee: Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System Oriented Approaches Explained 系统中的翻译：描写和系统理论解说17. Gull, Ernst-August: Translation and Relevance Cognition and Context翻译与关联：认知与语境18. Gentzler, Edwin: Contemporary Translation Theories (revised 2nd editio)当代翻译理论（第二版）19. Baker, Mona (ed.): Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies翻译研究百科全书20. Nida, Eugene A.: Toward a Science of Translating 翻译科学探索21. Nida, Eugene A. & Charles R.:The Theory and Practice of Translation翻译理论与实践22. Lefevere, Andre (ed.): Translation/History/Culture: A Sourcebook 翻译、历史与文化论集23. Reiss, Katharina: Translation Criticism: The Potentials and Limitations翻译批评：潜力与制约24. Venuti, Lawrence:The Translator's Invisibility: A History of Translation译者的隐身：一部翻译史25. Bassnett, Susan: Translation Studies (3rd edition) 翻译研究（第三版）26. Williams, Jenny & Andrew Chesterman:The Map: A Beginner's Guide to Doing Research in Translation Studies 路线图：翻译研究方法入门27. Shullleworth, Mark & Moira: Dictionary of Translation Studies翻译学词典三、中国对外翻译出版公司：翻译理论与实务丛书（罗进德主编）1. 马祖毅著中国翻译简史——五四以前部分（增订版）2. 金 著等效翻译探索 (增订版)3. 刘宓庆著文体与翻译 (增订版)4. 金圣华、黄国彬主编困难见巧——名家翻译经验谈5.周兆祥著翻译与人生6.陈生保编著英汉科技翻译指要7. 冯志杰著汉英科技翻译指要8. 陈忠诚著法窗译话9. 刘重德编著文学翻译十讲10. 陈定安编著英汉比较与翻译11. 谭载喜编著新编奈达论翻译12. 刘宓庆著当代翻译理论13. 郭建中编文化与翻译14. 陈忠诚著词语翻译丛谈15. 陈忠诚、吴幼娟著词语翻译丛谈续编16. 贾文波著汉英时文翻译17. 黄忠廉著翻译变体研究18. 马红军著翻译批评散论19.思果著翻译新究20. 李运兴著语篇翻译引论21. 包惠南著文化语境与语言翻译22. 刘宓庆著翻译与语言哲学23. 萧立明著新译学论稿四、其它：1. 《翻译论集》罗新璋编，商务印书馆，1984年版2. 《中国翻译史》(上卷) 马祖毅著，湖北教育出版社，1999年版3. 《西方翻译简史》谭载喜著，商务印书馆，1991年版4. 《外国翻译理论评介文集》中国对外翻译出版公司编印，1984年版5. 《奈达论翻译》谭载喜编译，中国对外翻译出版公司，1984年版6. 《语言与翻译》[苏]巴尔胡达罗夫著，蔡毅、虞杰、段京华编译，中国对外翻译出版公司，1985年版7. 《文体与翻译》刘宓庆著，中国对外翻译出版公司，1986年版8. 《习语汉译英研究》张培基编，商务印书馆，1979年版9. 《英汉翻译教程》张培基等编著，上海外语教育出版社，1980年版10. 《英汉翻译手册》钟述孔著，商务印书馆，1980年版11. 《翻译的技巧》钱歌川著，台湾开明书店印行，1972年版12. 《翻译漫谈》钱歌川著，中国对外翻译出版公司，1980年版13. 《科技翻译工作手册》李维颐等编，天津科学技术出版社，1986年版14. 《长安译论》王宏印主编，陕西旅游出版社，2000年版15. 《跨语交际》谭载喜编译，漓江出版社，1993年版16. 《语言论——言语研究导论》[美]爱德华·萨丕尔著，陆卓元译，商务印书馆，1997年版17. 《句法理论的若干问题》[美]诺姆·乔姆斯基著，黄长著、林书武、沈家煊译，中国社会科学出版社，1986年版18. 《意义的探究——当代西方释义学》张汝伦著，辽宁人民出版社，1986年版英汉翻译常用工具书（一）英汉类1．《新英汉词典》(增补本) 《新英汉词典》编写组编，上海译文出版社，1986年版2．《英华大辞典》(修订第二版) 郑易里等编并修订，商务印书馆，1984年版3．《英汉大辞典》(缩印本) 陆谷孙主编，上海译文出版社，1993年版4．《远东英汉大辞典》梁实秋主编，远东图书公司印行，1977年版5．《最新高级英汉词典》蔡文萦主编，李赋宁审校，商务印书馆国际有限公司，1994年版（二）汉英类1．《汉英词典》(修订版)、北京外国语大学英语系词典组编，外语教学与研究出版社，l 995年版2．《汉英大辞典》(上、下卷) 吴光华主编，上海交通大学出版社，1993年版3．《远东汉英大辞典》梁实秋原主编，张芳杰主编，新华出版社，远东图书公司，1995年版（三）英语类1．Longman Dicitonary of Contemporary Englis h，Longman Group Limited．19782．Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary，new ed．，Edinburgh & London，1972.3．The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language，New York．19754．Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language，Springfield，Mass．，1961(Addenda 1966)，19715．6,000 words：A Supplement to Webster’s Third New International Dictionary，Springfield，Mass．，19766．ORIGINS An Etymological Dictionary of Modern Englis h，by Eric Partridge，London，1990（四）汉语类1．《现代汉语词典》商务印书馆，1970年版2．《现代汉语词林》(正反序编排) 福建人民出版社，1986年版3．《汉语大字典》（缩印本）《汉语大字典》编委会，四川辞书出版社、湖北辞书出版社，1993年版4．《古代汉语词典》《古代汉语词典》编写组，商务印书馆，1998年版（五）专名类1．《英语姓名译名手册》(第二次修订本) 新华通讯社译名资料组编，商务印书馆，1985年版2．《世界姓名译名手册》《世界姓名译名手册》编译组编，化学工业出版社，1987年版3．《外国地名译名手册》中国地名委员会编，商务印书馆，1983年版4．《世界地名译名手册》辛华编，商务印书馆，1978年版5．《世界报刊、通讯社、电台译名手册》(修订本) 辛华编，商务印书馆；1978年版（六）略语类1．《英汉缩略语词典》西安外国语学院英语系《英汉缩略语词典》编写组，陕西人民出版社，1980年版2．《英语缩略词词典》史群编，商务印书馆，1979年版（七）科技类1．《英汉技术词典》清华大学《英汉技术词典》编写组编，国防工业出版社，1978年版2．《英汉科技缩写词汇》阎庆甲编，冶金工业出版社，1981年版3．《科技翻译工作手册》李维颐等编，天津科学技术出版社，1986年版（八）史地类1．《世界历史词典》勒文翰、郭圣铭、孙道天主编，上海辞书出版社，1985年版2．《外国历史大事年表》(公元前4500年一公元1945年) 王治邦、曲培洛、唐承运、于庆和、王永本编，辽宁人民出版社，1985年版3．《世界现代史大事记》吴成平编著，知识出版社，1984年版4．《美国两百年大事记》[美]加尔文·D·林顿编著，谢延光、储复耘、容再光、李祥荣译，上海译文出版社，1984年版5．《各国概况》(1979年版) 《各国概况》编辑组编，世界知识出版社，1979年版（九）百科类1．《辞海》(缩印本) 《辞海》编辑委员会编，上海辞书出版社，1989年版2．《辞源》(修订本) (1—4合订本)商务印书馆，1989年版3．《简明不列颠百科全书》(十卷本) 《简明不列颠百科全书》编辑部译编，中国大百科全书出版社，1986年版4．《中国大百科全书》(多卷本) 中国大百科全书出版社，1982年版。