考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死

考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死范文（八）Writi ng （图画提纲式议论文）Directio ns: Study the followi ng picture carefully and write an essay of 160 -200 words in which you should1）describe the picture.2）state differe nt views on mercy killi ng, and3）give your opinion on it.晚期癌症病人请求安乐死。

我们怎么办？范文Mercy killi ng is one of the most con troversial issues in the world of medici ne. As the picture give n above depicts, a late-stage cancer patie nt is term in ally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinkin g. It implies that people differ in theirattitudes towards the mercy killi ng. Some people think that physicia n-assistedsuicide can relieve dying patie nts of un bearable pain and sufferi ng. They maintainthat as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he hasdone nothing illegal even if the patie nt uses the drug to haste n death. Others arestron gly opposed to physicia n-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has noright to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I'm concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if theyprolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am infavor of mercy killing. (207 words)译文：安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。

对安乐死的看法英语作文Title: Contemplating Euthanasia: A Moral Exploration。

Euthanasia, commonly referred to as "assisted suicide" or "mercy killing," is a topic that evokes strong emotions and moral dilemmas. Advocates argue for the right to end suffering with dignity, while opponents raise concerns about the sanctity of life and the potential for abuse. In this essay, we will delve into the multifaceted aspects of euthanasia, examining its ethical implications and societal impacts.First and foremost, proponents of euthanasia advocate for individual autonomy and the right to die with dignity. They argue that individuals facing terminal illness or unbearable suffering should have the choice to end their lives peacefully, rather than enduring prolonged agony. From a utilitarian perspective, euthanasia can be seen as a compassionate act that minimizes overall suffering, bothfor the patient and their loved ones. Moreover, proponentsemphasize the importance of respecting patients' autonomy and their right to make decisions about their own bodies and lives.However, the ethical complexities of euthanasia cannot be overlooked. Opponents raise valid concerns about the potential for abuse and coercion, particularly in vulnerable populations such as the elderly or disabled. There is a risk that legalizing euthanasia could create a slippery slope, where the practice becomes increasingly normalized and vulnerable individuals may feel pressured to end their lives prematurely. Additionally, there are moral and religious arguments that emphasize the sanctity of life and the inherent value of every human being, regardless of their circumstances. From this perspective, intentionally ending a life, even to alleviate suffering, is considered morally wrong.Furthermore, the legalization of euthanasia raises questions about the role of healthcare professionals and the Hippocratic Oath, which traditionally emphasizes the duty to preserve life. While some argue that physiciansshould prioritize relieving suffering and respectingpatient autonomy, others believe that participating in euthanasia contradicts the fundamental principles of medical ethics. The potential emotional burden on healthcare providers who may be asked to assist in ending a patient's life is also a significant concern.From a societal standpoint, legalizing euthanasia could have far-reaching implications for healthcare systems, end-of-life care practices, and societal attitudes towards death and dying. It may influence how we approach discussions about death with patients and families, as well as the allocation of resources for palliative care and support services. Additionally, the legalization of euthanasia could prompt broader conversations about the quality of life, the meaning of suffering, and the boundaries of medical intervention.In conclusion, euthanasia is a complex and contentious issue that touches upon fundamental questions of ethics, autonomy, and the value of human life. While proponents argue for the right to die with dignity and compassion,opponents raise concerns about abuse, coercion, and the sanctity of life. As society grapples with these moral dilemmas, it is essential to engage in thoughtful dialogue and consider the far-reaching implications of euthanasia on individuals, healthcare systems, and societal norms. Ultimately, any decision regarding euthanasia should be guided by compassion, respect for human dignity, and a commitment to uphold the values that define our shared humanity.。

The euthanasiaThe fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged.The euthanasia has been becoming the hot topic around the world, and questioned discussion about its legalization occurs at home and abroad. In my opinion, the euthanasia is mercy.It can help hopeless ill patients to dead qucikly，relieve them from the pain , For these people，the quality of life is the foundation value of life .For these patients who can never be cured, death is unavoidable to them, so the euthanasia is the best way to let them away from great pain. And these patients have to suffer from the pain, at the same time, their family members have to stand the expensive medical expenses and the great hurt mentally,"We mustn't delay any longer …swallowing is difficult …and breathing, that's also difficult. Those muscles are weakening too …we mustn't delay any longer."the words from a Dutchman asked his doctor to help him die. At that time ,he was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly get worse.Therefore,it's merciful for the doctors to help these patience come to an end of their life with the euthanasia. In addition, to reduce the pain of the patients is one of the doctors' duty, so euthanasia. is moral. To be frank, everyone has the right and freedom to manage their own final destiny, such as refuse any cure. And thus right also includes the freedom of choosing to die as well as the ways of death, even when it's necessary to ask somebody else to end their life.In a word .I want to call on the legitimization of the euthanasia.let the patients get rid of the struggle between life and death as soon as possible.。

安乐死的英文作文英文：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people believe that individuals who are terminally ill or suffering from unbearable pain should have the right to choose to end their own lives with the help of a physician. Others argue that euthanasia goes against the sanctity of life and can lead to abuse.Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized under certain circumstances. For example, if a patient has a terminal illness and is in constant pain, they should have the right to end their suffering. However, strict regulations and guidelines must be put in place to prevent abuse and ensure that the patient is making an informed decision.In my opinion, the decision to end one's own life is adeeply personal one and should not be made lightly. It is important for the patient to have access to counseling and support to help them make an informed decision. Additionally, the physician who assists with the euthanasia should be well-trained and experienced in end-of-life care.中文：安乐死，也称为协助自杀或慈悲杀死，是一个备受争议的话题，已经争论了几十年。

支持安乐死英语作文Title: The Case for Euthanasia: A Moral Imperative。

Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, has long been a topic of ethical debate worldwide. Proponents argue that it is a compassionate choice for individuals suffering from incurable illnesses or unbearable pain, granting them the dignity of a peaceful death. I firmly support euthanasia as a fundamental human right and a morally justifiable act for several reasons.Firstly, euthanasia respects individual autonomy and self-determination. Every person has the right to make decisions about their own life, including the right to end it if they are facing terminal illness or intolerable suffering. Denying individuals the option of euthanasia deprives them of their autonomy and forces them to endure unnecessary pain and indignity against their will.Secondly, euthanasia is a manifestation of compassionand empathy towards those who are suffering. It offers a humane way to alleviate the physical and emotional distress of patients who have exhausted all treatment options and face a grim prognosis. Allowing them to end their lives with dignity and without prolonged agony is an act of kindness and mercy.Moreover, euthanasia can prevent unnecessary financial and emotional burdens on both patients and their families. Terminal illnesses often require extensive medical care and resources, placing a significant strain on healthcare systems and exhausting the savings of individuals and families. By opting for euthanasia, patients can avoid prolonged hospital stays and expensive treatments, freeing up resources for others in need and sparing their loved ones from witnessing their prolonged suffering.Critics of euthanasia often raise concerns about the potential for abuse and the slippery slope towards involuntary euthanasia. However, strict safeguards and regulations can be implemented to ensure that euthanasia is only carried out with the explicit consent of mentallycompetent patients who are facing unbearable suffering with no hope of improvement. Medical professionals can be involved in the decision-making process to verify the patient's condition and ensure that all other options, such as palliative care, have been explored.Furthermore, legalizing euthanasia can lead to greater transparency and accountability in end-of-life care. Currently, patients may resort to clandestine methods or unregulated practices to end their suffering, putting themselves at risk of botched attempts or inadequate pain management. Legalizing euthanasia allows for proper oversight and regulation, ensuring that patients receive the necessary support and guidance in making their end-of-life decisions.In conclusion, euthanasia is a compassionate andethical choice that respects the autonomy, dignity, and suffering of individuals facing terminal illness or unbearable pain. By legalizing euthanasia and implementing appropriate safeguards, society can uphold the principles of compassion, autonomy, and dignity in end-of-life care.It is time to recognize euthanasia as a fundamental human right and provide individuals with the option of a peaceful and dignified death when faced with unbearable suffering.。

安乐死Die With Pleasure大学英语作文Mercy killling has been the hot issue and some animals were accepted this way of death. In some countries, mercy killing is legal for human being. When people are badly ill and have given up life, they wished to die with pleasure. Betsy Davis made her choice.安乐死一直是一个热点话题，一些动物接受了这种方式离去。

在一些国家，安乐死是合法的。

当人们病得很严重的时候，对生命已经放弃了希望，他们就希望快乐地死去。

贝特西·戴维斯就做出了自己的选择。

Betsy Davis was an artist and she suffered from ALS. After being treated for some time, she still got sick worse and worse and she had big trouble in moving, so she decided to accept mercy killing. But she was not going to die sadly, instead, she emailed her families and friends to join her good-bye party for two days, and she told them not to be sad but only with pleasure.贝特西·戴维斯是一个艺术家，她患有肌萎缩性侧索硬化症，接受一段时间治疗后，病情仍然恶化了，她难以移动，所以她决定接受安乐死。

安乐死英语作文Euthanasia is a highly controversial topic that has sparked heated debates and discussions around the world. Also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, euthanasia is the act of intentionally ending a person's life to relieve them from suffering. While some argue that euthanasia is a compassionate and humane act, others believe that it goes against the sanctity of life and raises ethical and moral concerns.Proponents of euthanasia argue that it is a compassionate way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients who are in unbearable pain. They believe that individuals should have the right to die with dignity and that euthanasia provides a peaceful and painless way to end their suffering. Furthermore, they argue that allowing euthanasia gives individuals the autonomy to make decisions about their own lives and deaths, and that it can provide comfort to both the patients and their families.On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia argue thatit goes against the fundamental principle of the sanctityof life. They believe that every human life is valuable and should be protected, and that euthanasia undermines the value of life. Additionally, they raise concerns about the potential for abuse and coercion in euthanasia cases, and the slippery slope that could lead to the devaluation of human life.In many countries, euthanasia is illegal and considered a criminal act. However, there are some countries andstates that have legalized euthanasia under certain circumstances. For example, in the Netherlands and Belgium, euthanasia is legal under strict regulations and guidelines, and patients must meet specific criteria in order toqualify for euthanasia. In the United States, severalstates have also legalized euthanasia, with Oregon beingthe first to do so in 1997.The legalization of euthanasia has sparked intense debates and discussions about the ethical, moral, and legal implications of this controversial practice. While someargue that euthanasia provides a compassionate and humane way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients, others believe that it goes against the sanctity of life and raises concerns about potential abuse and coercion.In conclusion, euthanasia is a complex and contentious issue that raises important ethical, moral, and legal questions. While proponents argue that it provides a compassionate way to end the suffering of terminally ill patients, opponents raise concerns about the value of life and the potential for abuse. As the debate over euthanasia continues, it is important to consider the perspectives of all stakeholders and carefully weigh the ethical, moral, and legal implications of this controversial practice.。

Euthanasia should be illegalSubmitted by: XxxxxxEnglish WritingDecember 15, 2009OutlineThesis: Euthanasia should be illegal.(1)Introduction: the definition and general introduction of euthanasia is broughtabout.(2)The legality of euthanasia differs in different countries and more importanceshould be attached to ethics and moral principles.(3)From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for fourreasons.A.Some patients choose euthanasia just because of poverty.B.Some doctors may give up the efforts to save the sufferers if euthanasia ispermitted.C.The euthanasia may be used to murder the patients.D.No one should be denied the right to live.(4)A survey is introduced about people‟s attitude toward euthanasia.(5)Conclusion: euthanasia should be made illegal.Euthanasia should be illegalThe term …euthanasia‟ derives from the ancient Greek word euthanatos, meaning …easy death,‟ which combines eu …good‟ and thanatos …death‟. In Webster‟s dictionary euthan asia is defined as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy”（Pestalozzi 263）. Generally speaking, euthanasia is not a new problem, and until now, it is still a controversial issue. The euthanasia itself is a complex problem which covers so many fields, such as law, ethics, medical principle and so on.As to the legality of euthanasia, although euthanasia law was legalized in some west countries, such as Netherlands, which is the first country to make euthanasia legal, there is no definite legal provision to allow euthanasia in our country. To many of us, to perform euthanasia on the sufferer is no less than murdering. Of course, we have to admit that euthanasia can lessen the pain of the sufferer to a certain extent so that the patient can die without enduring so much pain. But, we should also realize that there are surely ethics and moral principles which we should attach more importance to.From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for four reasons. First, some sufferers, especially those in poverty, choose euthanasia just because they do not want the family to get involved into financial problems. As their family members, should we give up and see the one who are intimate to us die in desperate? The answer is of course not. What we should do is just to back them andencourage them. Second, if euthanasia is permitted, then some doctors may just give up the efforts to save the sufferer and abandon the patients to euthanasia, which may insult the essence and mission of the doctor. Third, in order to get the estates of the patients, the relatives of the sufferer and the doctor may take advantage of euthanasia to murder the patients. Fourth, life is given to us only once, thus, no one should be denied the right to die. Here, I would like to mention the euthanasia issue happened in Florida America. That is the story about Terri Schindler-Schiavo, who was in a condition of diminished consciousness since 1990. Although at last, she was disconnected from life support at the request of her husband, this event still drew much public attention and even the US government was involved (Wikipedia). Schindler-Schiavo has died, but the argumentation of her death and the argumentation about moral principles have not stopped.As to the attitudes towards euthanasia in general and attitudes towards legalization of euthanasia, doctor Radulovic and Mojsilovic had once made a survey among oncologists, home care physicians (family doctors), third-year medical students and lawyers. The result showed that more than half of the individuals (57%) were against euthanasia, and 61% are against the legalization of euthanasia (Radulovic and Mojsilovic 400-412). So, making efforts to reduce the pains of sufferer, trying our best to save the patient, showing more care to the patient, and improving the service of the hospital are really something more important than euthanasia.As to the legality of euthanasia, different people may have different opinions. But we should always believe that medical problems today may be solved tomorrow. Sothe sufferer should not be given up. As long as we have confidence, then everything is possible. Besides, euthanasia is to some extent against the ethics and is not widely accepted. So, euthanasia should be made illegal.Works cited:Pestalozzi, “Euthanasia: do we know it and do we need it?”, Support Care Cancer, no.10 (April 2002):263-264.Radulovic, Mojsilovic, “Attitudes of oncologists, family doctors, medical students and lawyers to euthanasia”, Support Care Cancer, no.6 (1998):410-415Terri Schiavo case, Wikipedia, /wiki/Terri_Schiavo: Accessed December 18, 2009。

Euthanasia: A Means, Not the End Summary:Euthanasia means "happy death" or "mercy killing", which is sometimes used to help patients die without suffering too much pain. The purpose of euthanasia is kind and benevolent, but as it is related to death, the result may not seem so kind or benevolent when we see anyone die. This is why euthanasia becomes one of the most widely and hotly debated issues in society. Do we have "the right to die"? Should euthanasia be legalized? In what kind of situation will euthanasia be put into practice?(words:87)With the high-speed development of medicine, our life become much longer and more comfortable. Though medicine can usually prevent us from death, we cannot avoid dying throughout life. If your disease were incurable, of course high-level medicine could extend your life more or less, but it would also extend your pain at the same time. In this situation, as death is visible and unavoidable while pain is hard for you to stand, euthanasia is used.Many people around the world are in favor of the idea of euthanasia, the core concept they invoke is "the right to die", which means anyone who has incurable disease with pain beyond suffering can choose to die when they or their family is determined to. People supporting the idea "the right to die" believe that euthanasia is humane, because it helps hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients, relieving them from the fierce pain, which is good for not only the dying patients but their families.Of course, the use of euthanasia has rationality. It's necessary to permit euthanasia in some special situations.However, there are also many disadvantages of euthanasia. First, euthanasia can be abused when doctors is treating disabled people and old people, which leads to crime. Second, when a seriously-ill patient is determined to take euthanasia, he may not make clear-headed decision because his consciousness is probably muddled. Third, too many examples of euthanasia may result in social moral crisis and doctors may not try their best to cure a dying patient once they have the power to practice euthanasia. This conduct is nothing less than murdering.In order to prevent the abuse of euthanasia, we must strictly standard ize the application of euthanasia. So, when can doctor use euthanasia legally? I think it depends on several conditions.First of all, euthanasia can be only practiced on terminally ill patients, when the practice of euthanasia serves only to hasten death. Secondly, we should guarantee the earnest and strictness of euthanasia, so taking euthanasia need the permission of patient himself or his family, the acceptance of doctors and the certificate from court. Thirdly, the method to practice euthanasia must conform to humanitarianism, and only professional and qualified doctor can practice euthanasia. Finally, legal euthanasia can't betray its original purpose. Euthanasia is a merciful way to end patients' life. Doctors practice euthanasia in order that the patients will no longer suffer a fierce pain. Euthanasia can make the patients die peacefully. To some extent, it is a kind of respect to human life.Euthanasia has come into being for a long time, it's impossible and groundless to forbid it completely. I think it won't be long to legalize euthanasia in China, what we should do is to make the law on euthanasia as perfect as possible.Anyhow, we shouldn't regard euthanasia as a painless way to commit suicide, and there is no reason for us to take it for granted that euthanasia is a good way to terminate our life. Y ou cannot expect euthanasia to bring you any relief as it seems, the only thing euthanasia can do is take your pain with your life. After all, life is the most precious treasure we have.In fact, to terminate one's life by taking euthanasia is not only a legal issue but also a moral issue because it refers to a choice between painfully liv ing and comfortably dying. Which one would you choose? Just like what Confucius said: "It's useless talking about death before you understand life clearly."[1]According to Confucius's words, it's useless talking about choosing how to die while we haven't settled the problems of life. So should we pay too much attention on "the right of death" while we still can't guarantee the rights of life? Is it the time for us to focus more on those people who are alive?(words:655) [1] 出自《论语·先进》:孔子云：“未知生，焉知死？”Reference:1.Y e Gaofeng. "A Law View on Euthanasia",The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law . 1(2001): 3992.Zhang Yutang. "Do We Have right to die?" Law. 5(2001): 333.Wu Jing. "Euthanasia Is Not Crime", The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law. 1(2000): 1134.Wang Xiaohui. To Discuss Euthanasia. Jilin People's Press5.Chu Dongping. Euthanasia. Shanghai. Culture Press, 1988。